(consumer psychology and behavior on financial...
TRANSCRIPT
金融科技FinTech:FinancialTechnology
1
1052FinTech06MISEMBA(M2263)(8595)
Fri,12,13,14(19:20-22:10)(D409)
金融服務消費者心理與行為(ConsumerPsychologyandBehavior
onFinancialServices)
Min-Yuh Day戴敏育
Assistant Professor專任助理教授
Dept. of Information Management, Tamkang University淡江大學資訊管理學系
http://mail. tku.edu.tw/myday/2017-03-31
TamkangUniversity
週次 (Week)日期 (Date)內容 (Subject/Topics)12017/02/17Fintech金融科技課程介紹
(CourseOrientationforFintech:FinancialTechnology)22017/02/24Fintech金融科技的演進:貨幣與金融服務
(EvolutionofFintech:MoneyandFinancialServices)32017/03/03Fintech金融科技:金融服務科技創新
(Fintech:TechnologyInnovationinFinancialServices)42017/03/10Fintech金融科技與金融服務價值鏈
(FintechandFinancialServicesValueChain)52017/03/17Fintech金融科技商業模式創新
(FintechBusinessModelsInnovation)62017/03/24Fintech金融科技個案研究 I
(CaseStudyonFintech I)
課程大綱 (Syllabus)
2
週次 (Week)日期 (Date)內容 (Subject/Topics)72017/03/31金融服務消費者心理與行為
(ConsumerPsychologyandBehavioronFinancialServices)
82017/04/07教學行政觀摩日 (Off-campusstudy)92017/04/14區塊鏈技術
(Blockchain Technology)[InvitedSpeaker:Dr.Raymund Lin,IBM(林俊叡博士,IBM)]
102017/04/21期中報告 (MidtermProjectReport)112017/04/28PythonPandas財務大數據分析
(FinanceBigDataAnalyticswithPandasinPython)122017/05/05人工智慧與深度學習金融科技
(ArtificialIntelligenceandDeepLearningforFintech)
課程大綱 (Syllabus)
3
週次 (Week)日期 (Date)內容 (Subject/Topics)132017/05/12Fintech金融科技個案研究 II
(CaseStudyonFintechII)142017/05/19金融科技財富管理:機器人理財顧問
(Robo-AdvisorsforWealthManagementinFintech)152017/05/26投資組合最佳化與程式交易
(PortfolioOptimizationandAlgorithmicTrading)162017/06/02金融科技智慧問答系統
(IntelligentQuestionAnsweringSystemforFintech)172017/06/09期末報告 I(FinalProjectPresentationI)182017/06/16期末報告 II(FinalProjectPresentationII)
課程大綱 (Syllabus)
4
Howconsumersthink,feel,andact
7Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
FintechImpactonConsumerBehavior
9Source: http://bitcoinist.com/fintech-impact-consumer-behavior-mobile-payments/
Hersh Shefrin (2007),BeyondGreedandFear:
UnderstandingBehavioralFinanceandthePsychologyofInvesting,OxfordUniversityPress
11Source: https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Greed-Fear-Understanding-Association/dp/0195304217
AndreiShleifer(2000),InefficientMarkets:AnIntroductiontoBehavioralFinance,
OxfordUniversityPress
12Source: https://www.amazon.com/Inefficient-Markets-Introduction-Behavioral-Clarendon/dp/0198292279
LucyAckert andRichardDeaves (2009),BehavioralFinance:Psychology,Decision-Making,andMarkets,
South-WesternCollegePub
13Source: https://www.amazon.com/Behavioral-Finance-Psychology-Decision-Making-Markets/dp/0324661177
EdwinBurtonandSunit N.Shah(2013)BehavioralFinance:UnderstandingtheSocial,Cognitive,and
EconomicDebates,Wiley
14Source: https://www.amazon.com/Behavioral-Finance-Understanding-Cognitive-Economic/dp/111830019X
H.KentBakerandVictorRicciardi (2014)InvestorBehavior:ThePsychologyofFinancialPlanningand
Investing,Wiley
15Source: https://www.amazon.com/Investor-Behavior-Psychology-Financial-Investing/dp/1118492986
Marketing
“Meetingneeds
profitably”16Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
Valuethesumofthetangibleandintangible
benefitsandcosts17Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
Value
18
Totalcustomer
benefitCustomerperceived
valueTotal
customer
cost
Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
CustomerPerceivedValue
19
Productbenefit
Servicesbenefit
Personnelbenefit
Imagebenefit
Totalcustomer
benefitCustomerperceived
valueTotal
customer
cost
Monetarycost
Timecost
Energycost
Psychologicalcost
Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
ModelofConsumerBehavior
20
MarketingStimuli
OtherStimuli
• Products&Services
• Price• Distribution• Communications
• Economic• Technological• Political• Cultural
Psychology
• Motivation• Perception• Learning• Memory
ConsumerCharacteristics
• Cultural• Social• Personal
BuyingDecisionProcess
PurchaseDecision
• ProblemRecognition
• InformationSearch
• EvaluationofAlternatives
• Purchasedecision
• Post-purchasebehavior
• Productchoice• Brandchoice• Dealerchoice• Purchaseamount• Purchasetiming• Paymentmethod
Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
BuildingCustomerValue,Satisfaction,
andLoyalty
21Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
CustomerPerceivedValue,CustomerSatisfaction,andLoyalty
22
CustomerPerceived
Performance
CustomerExpectations
CustomerPerceivedValue
CustomerSatisfaction
CustomerLoyalty
Source:PhilipKotler &KevinLaneKeller,MarketingManagement,14thed.,Pearson,2012
TheoryofReasonedAction(TRA)
23Source: Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory
and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
TRA(1975)
Source: Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 24
TRA(1989)
Davis,F.D.,R.P.Bagozzi and P.R.Warshaw,“User acceptance of computer technology : A comparison of two theoretical models ”,Management Science,35(8),August 1989,pp.982-1003 25
TheoryofPlannedBehavior(TPB)
26Source: Ajzen, I., (1985) “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann
(Eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to behavior, Springer Verlag, New york, 1985, pp.11-39.
TPB(1985)
Ajzen, I., (1985) “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to behavior, Springer Verlag, New york, 1985, pp.11-39. 27
TPB(1989)
Ajzen, I., (1989) “Attitude Structure and Behavior,” in A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, and A. G. Greenwald(Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989, pp.241-274. 28
TPB(1991)
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. 29
TechnologyAcceptance
Model(TAM)
31Source: Davis,F.D.,R.P.Bagozzi and P.R.Warshaw,“User acceptance of computer technology : A comparison of two theoretical models ”,Management Science,35(8),August 1989,pp.982-1003
TAM(1989)
Davis,F.D.,R.P.Bagozzi and P.R.Warshaw,“User acceptance of computer technology : A comparison of two theoretical models ”,Management Science,35(8),August 1989,pp.982-1003 32
TAM2(2000)
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, 46(2), pp. 186-204. 33
ModernFinancialResearch
• TheoreticalFinance– studyoflogicalrelationshipsamongassets.
• EmpiricalFinance– studyofdata inordertoinferrelationships.
• BehavioralFinance– integratespsychology intotheinvestmentprocess.
37Source: Robert A. Strong (2004), Practical Investment Management, South-Western
PsychologyinBehaviorFinance
• Beliefs• Preferences
–Prospecttheory–Ambiguityaversion
38Source: Barberis, Nicholas, and Richard Thaler. "A survey of behavioral finance." Handbook of the Economics of Finance 1 (2003): 1053-1128.
BehavioralFinanceThemes
• Heuristic-DrivenBias• FramingDependence• InefficientMarkets
39Source: Hersh Shefrin (2007), “Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing”, Oxford University Press.
EfficientMarket
Hypothesis(EMH)
40Source: Hersh Shefrin (2007), “Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing”, Oxford University Press.
ExpectedUtilityTheory(EUT)
41Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Prospecttheory:Ananalysisofdecisionunder
risk42
Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
DecisionMakingunderRisk
44Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Whichofthefollowingwouldyouprefer?
• A:–50%chancetowin1,000,–50%chancetowinnothing;
• B:–450forsure.
45Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
46Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
47Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
48Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
49Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
ExpectedUtility
50Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
51Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
52Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
53Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
54Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
55Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
56Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
PreferencesBetweenPositiveandNegativeProspects
57Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Certainty,Probability,
andPossibility
58Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
ProspecttheoryValueFunction
59Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
ProspecttheoryWeightingFunction
60Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Problem4asadecisiontree(standardformulation)
61Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Problem10asadecisiontree(sequentialformulation)
62Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
63Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
64Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Decision
65Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Prospecttheory
• Peopleunderweightoutcomesthataremerelyprobableincomparisonwithoutcomesthatareobtainedwithcertainty.– Thistendency,calledthecertaintyeffect,contributestoriskaversioninchoicesinvolvingsuregainsandtoriskseekinginchoicesinvolvingsurelosses.
66Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Prospecttheory
• Peoplegenerallydiscardcomponentsthataresharedbyallprospectsunderconsideration.– Thistendency,calledtheisolationeffect,leadstoinconsistentpreferenceswhenthesamechoiceispresentedindifferentform.
67Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Prospecttheory
• Peoplegenerallydiscardcomponentsthataresharedbyallprospectsunderconsideration.– Thistendency,calledtheisolationeffect,leadstoinconsistentpreferenceswhenthesamechoiceispresentedindifferentform.
68Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
Prospecttheory
• Value isassignedtogainsandlossesratherthantofinalassetsandinwhichprobabilitiesarereplacedbydecisionweights.
• Thevaluefunctionisnormallyconcaveforgains,commonlyconvexforlosses,andisgenerallysteeperforlossesthanforgains.
69Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."
Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
• Decisionweightsaregenerallylower thanthecorrespondingprobabilities,exceptintherangeoflowprobabilities.
• Overweighting oflowprobabilitiesmaycontributetotheattractivenessofbothinsuranceandgambling.
70
Prospecttheory
Source: Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk."Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979): 263-291.
BehavioralFinanceAnomalies
• TheRationalMan– ConsumerChoicewithCertainty– ConsumerChoicewithUncertainty– TheAllaisParadox
72Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
ProspectTheory
• TheReferencePoint• TheS-Curve• LossAversion
73Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
• PerceptionBiases• InertialEffects• CausalityandStatistics• Illusions
74Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
BehavioralFinanceAnomalies
• Saliency• Framing• Anchoring• SunkCostBias
75Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
PerceptionBiases
• EndowmentEffect• StatusQuoEffect• DispositionEffect
76Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
InertialEffects
• Representativeness• ConjunctionFallacy• ReadingintoRandomness• SmallSampleBias• ProbabilityNeglect
77Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
CausalityandStatistics
• IllusionofTalent• IllusionofSkill• IllusionofSuperiority• IllusionofValidity
78Source: Edwin Burton and Sunit N. Shah (2013), “Behavioral Finance: Understanding the Social, Cognitive, and Economic Debates”, Wiley.
Illusions
BehavioralFinance:TwoMajorFoundations
• InvestorSentiment– createsdisturbancestoefficientprices.
• Limitedarbitrage– arbitrageisneverriskfree,henceitdoesnotcounterirrationaldisturbances.
• Pricesmaynotreacttoinformationbythe“right”amount.• Pricesmayreacttonon-information.• Marketsmayremainefficient.
79
Arbitrage
80Source: http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/moviemom/2012/09/interview-nicholas-jarecki-of-arbitrage.html
Heuristics• Overconfidence
– peopleoverestimatethereliabilityoftheirknowledge.
• Excessivetrading• FramingEffect
82
Heuristics• RegretAversion
– anticipationofafutureregretcaninfluencecurrentdecision.
• DispositionEffect– sellwinners,holdontothelosers.
• Anchoringandadjustment:cancreateunder-reaction.
83
FashionsandFads
• Peopleareinfluencedbyeachother.Thereisasocialpressuretoconform.
• Herdingbehavior:“safety-in-numbers”.• InformationalCascades• PositiveFeedback• Example:excessivedemandforinternetIPOs.Extremelyhighopeningdayreturns.
84
SocialInfluences
• Socialnorms– Theinformalopinions,rules,andproceduresofagroup.
– Yourpiersandsocialgroupsinfluenceyourinvestmentparticipation
• HerdingBehavior– Themovementintooroutofastockorindustryofcompaniesbylargegroupsofinvestors.
85
86Source: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/confirmation-bias-it-s-not-what-we-think-we-know-that-counts
PsychologyofBeliefConfirmationBias
87
ConfirmationBias
Source: Robert A. Strong (2004), Practical Investment Management, South-Western
TheFacts
YourBeliefs
Overvalued
RepresentativenessHeuristic
88Source: Robert A. Strong (2004), Practical Investment Management, South-Western
A B
P (A & B) < P (A) or P (B)
A & B
HerdingBehavior
• Herdingreferstothelemming-likebehaviorofinvestorsandanalystslookingaround,seeingwhateachotherisdoing,andheadinginthatdirection.
• Theremaynothavebeensafetyinnumbers,butthereprobablywassomecomfortinthem.
89Source: Robert A. Strong (2004), Practical Investment Management, South-Western v
90Source: Van Raaij, W. Fred. "Economic psychology." Journal of Economic Psychology 1, no. 1 (1981): 1-24.
EconomicConditions
(E)
PersonalCharacteristics
(P)
EconomicBehavior(B)
Katona’sEconomicPsychologyModel
References• PaoloSironi (2016),“FinTech Innovation:FromRobo-AdvisorstoGoalBased
InvestingandGamification”,Wiley.• SusanneChishtiandJanosBarberis (2016),“TheFINTECHBook:TheFinancial
TechnologyHandbookforInvestors,EntrepreneursandVisionaries”,Wiley.• LucyAckert andRichardDeaves (2009),“BehavioralFinance:Psychology,
Decision-Making,andMarkets”,South-WesternCollegePub.• Hersh Shefrin (2007),“BeyondGreedandFear:UnderstandingBehavioral
FinanceandthePsychologyofInvesting”,OxfordUniversityPress.• EdwinBurtonandSunit N.Shah(2013),“BehavioralFinance:Understanding
theSocial,Cognitive,andEconomicDebates”,Wiley.• DanielKahneman andAmosTversky (1979),"Prospecttheory:Ananalysisof
decisionunderrisk." Econometrica:Journaloftheeconometricsociety (1979):263-291.
91