copyright © 2011 by the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. all rights reserved. slide 7-1 chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Slide 7-1
Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7Trust, Justice and Ethics
Slide 7-2
Learning Goals What is trust, and how does it relate to justice
and ethics? In what three sources can trust be rooted? What dimensions can be used to describe the
trustworthiness of an authority? What dimensions can be used to describe the
fairness of an authority’s decision making?
Slide 7-3
Learning Goals, Cont’d
What is the four-component model of ethical decision making?
How does trust affect job performance and organizational commitment?
What steps can organizations take to become more trustworthy?
Slide 7-4
Trust, Justice, and Ethics
Reputation
Trust
Justice
Ethics
Slide 7-5
“World’s Most Admired Companies”Ta
ble
7-1
Slide 7-6
Discussion Questions
Why are some authorities more trusted than others?
Would you be willing to let that person have significant influence over your professional or educational future?
Slide 7-7
Trust
Disposition-based trust
Cognition-based trust
Affect-based trust
Slide 7-8
Disposition-Based Trust
Has less to do with the authority and more to do with the trustor. Some trustors are high in trust propensity Trust propensity levels are actually relatively high
in the United States, especially in relation to countries in Europe and South America.
Slide 7-9
Trust Propensities by NationFi
gure
7-2
Slide 7-10
Cognition-Based Trust
Our trust begins to be based on cognitions we‘ve developed about the authority, as opposed to our own personality or disposition.TrustworthinessDriven by the authority’s “track record.”
Slide 7-11
The Track Record
Ability
Benevolence
Integrity
Slide 7-12
Affect-Based Trust
Often more emotional than rational. We trust because we have feelings for the person in
question; we really like them and have a fondness for them.
Affect-based trust sometimes acts as a supplement to the types of trust discussed previously.
An emotional bond develops, and our feelings for the trustee further increase our willingness to accept vulnerability.
Slide 7-13
Types of Trust Over TimeFi
gure
7-3
Slide 7-14
Factors that
Influence Trust
Levels
Figu
re 7
-1
Slide 7-15
Justice
Distributive justice
Procedural justice
Slide 7-16
Procedural Justice Rules Voice
Correctability
Consistency, bias suppression, representativeness, and accuracy
Slide 7-17
Some of the 50 Best Companies for Minorities
Tabl
e 7-
3
Slide 7-18
Procedural Justice
Does procedural justice really matter—don’t people just care about the outcomes that they
receive?
Distributive justice and procedural justice combine to influence employee reactions.When outcomes are bad, procedural justice
becomes enormously important.Procedural justice tends to be a stronger driver of
reactions to authorities than distributive justice.
Slide 7-19
Combined Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice
Figu
re 7
-4
Slide 7-20
Justice, Cont’d
Interpersonal justice Interpersonal justice is fostered when authorities
adhere to two particular rules.Respect rulePropriety rule
When taken to the extremes, interpersonally unjust actions create abusive supervision.
Slide 7-21
Justice, Cont’d
Informational justiceInformational justice is fostered when
authorities adhere to two particular rules.Justification ruleTruthfulness rule
Slide 7-22
The Effects of Justice on Theft During a Pay Cut
Figu
re 7
-5
Slide 7-23
The Four Dimensions of JusticeTa
ble
7-2
Slide 7-24
Ethics Research on ethics seeks to explain why
people behave in a manner consistent with generally accepted norms of morality, and why they sometimes violate those norms. Two primary threads
PrescriptiveDescriptive
Whistle-blowing
Slide 7-25
The Four-Component Model of Ethical Decision Making
Figu
re 7
-6
INSERT ONCE REVISED
Slide 7-26
The Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making
Moral awareness Moral intensity Moral attentiveness
Moral judgment Cognitive moral development theory
Preconventional stageConventional stagePrincipled (or postconventional) stage
Moral principles
Slide 7-27
The Dimensions of Moral IntensityTa
ble
7-4
Slide 7-28
Ethical Dilemma Used to Assess Moral Development
Tabl
e 7-
5
Slide 7-29
Moral Principles Used in the Principled Stage
Tabl
e 7-
6
Slide 7-30
The Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making, Cont’d
Moral intent The distinction between awareness or judgment
on the one hand and intent on the other is important, because many unethical people know and understand that what they’re doing is wrong—they just choose to do it anyway.
One driver of moral intent is moral identity
Slide 7-31
Why Are Some Authorities
More Trusted Than Others?
Figu
re 7
-7
Slide 7-32
How Important Is Trust? Trust relates to performance because it
increases an employees ability to focus. Trust also influences citizenship behavior and
counterproductive behavior because it allows employees to develop social exchange relationships instead of economic exchange relationships with their employers.Economic exchange Social exchange
Slide 7-33
Effects of Trust on Performance and Commitment
Figu
re 7
-8
Slide 7-34
Application: Social Responsibility
Corporate social responsibility
A company’s obligations do not end with profit maximization.
Organizations have an obligation to do what is right, just, and fair and to avoid harm.
Slide 7-35
Takeaways Trust is the willingness to be vulnerable to an authority based on positive
expectations about the authority’s actions and intentions. Justice reflects the perceived fairness of an authority’s decision making and can be used to explain why employees judge some authorities as more trustworthy than others. Ethics reflects the degree to which the behaviors of an authority are in accordance with generally accepted moral norms and can be used to explain why authorities choose to act in a trustworthy manner.
Trust can be disposition-based, meaning that one’s personality includes a general propensity to trust others. Trust can also be cognition-based, meaning that it’s rooted in a rational assessment of the authority’s trustworthiness. Finally, trust can be affect-based, meaning that it’s rooted in feelings toward the authority that go beyond any rational assessment of trustworthiness.
Slide 7-36
Takeaways, Cont’d Trustworthiness is judged along three dimensions. Ability reflects the
skills, competencies, and areas of expertise that an authority possesses. Benevolence is the degree to which an authority wants to do good for the trustor, apart from any selfish or profit-centered motives. Integrity is the degree to which an authority adheres to a set of values and principles that the trustor finds acceptable.
The fairness of an authority’s decision making can be judged along four dimensions. Distributive justice reflects the perceived fairness of decision-making outcomes. Procedural justice reflects the perceived fairness of decision-making processes. Interpersonal justice reflects the perceived fairness of the treatment received by employees from authorities. Informational justice reflects the perceived fairness of the communications provided to employees from authorities.
Slide 7-37
Takeaways, Cont’d The four-component model of ethical decision making argues that ethical
behavior depends on three concepts. Moral awareness reflects whether an authority recognizes that a moral issue exists in a situation. Moral judgment reflects whether the authority can accurately identify the “right” course of action. Moral intent reflects an authority’s degree of commitment to the moral course of action.
Trust has a moderate positive relationship with job performance and a strong positive relationship with organizational commitment.
Organizations can become more trustworthy by emphasizing corporate social responsibility, a perspective that acknowledges that the responsibilities of a business encompass the economic, legal, ethical, and citizenship expectations of society.