corporate information transparency index (citi)

of 46 /46
CITI 指指指 147 指指指指指指指 CITI Index and the Initial Assessment of 147 Brands Greening the Global Supply Chain 指指指指激激激激激激

Upload: ipe-institute-of-public-environmental-affairs

Post on 21-Aug-2014

224 views

Category:

Environment


19 download

DESCRIPTION

The Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) is a new quantitative evaluation system designed to measure a brand’s performance in managing the environmental impacts of their supply chains in China.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 指数及 147 个品牌首次评价CITI Index and the Initial Assessment of 147 Brands

Greening the Global Supply Chain绿色采购激发污染减排

Page 2: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Authors

Institute of Public Environmental Affairs (IPE)(公众环境研究中心):马军,马莹莹, Matthew Collins ,袁言,李杰,畅子葳,郭美岑,苑媛Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)(自然资源保护协会): Linda Greer, Joseph Luk

Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) and the Initial Assessment of 147 Brands

Page 3: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Pollution in China

Page 4: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Pollution in China

Page 5: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Purpose of Report

• Why a new index?• Existing sustainability indices fail to assess

supply chain impacts adequately.

Page 6: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Current Sustainability Indices Fail to Assess Supply Chain Impacts

• Over 100 codes and certifications on how to reduce environmental impact, but most corporate social responsibility programs focus inadequate attention on pollution from supply chains.

• Supply chain activities count for too small of a component of the overall sustainability score in existing indices.

Page 7: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Voluntary Certification and Standards are of Limited Use

Page 8: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

The CITI Addresses This Gap

Performance assessment based on supply chain management

Page 9: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI : Scope of evaluation

Assessed 147 Brands

Page 10: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI : Areas of evaluation

1. Communication and Follow-up

2. Compliance and Corrective Actions

3. Extending Green Supply Chains Practices

4. Target Setting and Data Disclosure

5. Recycling and Reuse

Page 11: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI : Areas of evaluation

Page 12: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI : Roadmap for Greening Supply Chain

Page 13: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Communication and Follow-Up

• Partner with NGOs to engage brands to green their supply chains• Began with 21 NGOs, now increased to 51

Page 15: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

March 2012 - the GCA moved into the Textile Industry

Page 16: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Several IT and textile industry reports released

自然之友 公众环境研究中心 环友科技 自然大学 南京绿石自然之友 公众环境研究中心 环友科技 自然大学 南京绿石

Page 17: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

IPE database can be used to screen suppliers for violations

Compliance and Corrective Actions

Over 150,000 environmental

violations recorded

Page 18: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Public explanations about violations and corrective actions

Compliance and Corrective Actions

Page 19: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Real Time Disclosure of Data

在线平台公开自行监测数据 / Online monitoring platforms to disclose self-monitoring data

Page 20: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Compliance and Corrective Action

Page 21: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

IPE Pollution Map database + Field Investigations with NGOs

Compliance and Corrective Actions

Page 22: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

IPE Pollution Map Database

Page 23: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brands should identify the heavily polluting sectors of their supply chain and put particular focus on suppliers in these areas

Extend Green Supply Chain Practices

Page 24: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brands push their suppliers to screen their suppliers, so tier one suppliers screen tier 2, and tier 2 screen tier 3 etc.

Extend Green Supply Chain Practices

Page 25: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

IPE in 2013 created a prototype pollution release transfer register (PRTR) system for companies to self-report their environmental data.

Data Disclosure

Page 26: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brands should publish a requirement for suppliers to disclose PRTR data

Data Disclosure

Page 27: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brands should push suppliers to disclose energy and emission targets and how well they have met these targets

Data Disclosure

Page 28: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brands should take part in or establish a recycling program in China

Should also track waste products to recycling facility and ensure that facilities are all in compliance

Responsible Recycling

Page 29: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brand RankingsNo. 品牌 总分

(100)No. 品牌 总分

(100)No. 品牌 总分

(100)No. 品牌 总分

(100)No. 品牌 总分

(100)1 Apple 65.5 31 联想 34.5 61 P&G 13.5 91 Seiko Epson 6.5 115 上海家化 0

2 H&M 61.5 31 Philips 34.5 61 青岛 13.5 92 统一 5.5 115 燕京啤酒 03 Esquel 61 33 IKEA 33.5 61 立白 13.5 92 康师傅 5.5 115 奇瑞 0

4 GAP 55.5 34 雅戈尔 32 64 Volkswagen 13 92 中粮 5.5 115 茅台啤酒 0

4 C&A 55.5 34 Ann Taylor 32 65 Lafuma 12.5 92 Colgate-Palmolive 5.5 115 CHANEL 0

6 HP 55 36 Sony 31.5 65 Tommy Hilfiger 12.5 96 Hyundai 5 115 COACH 0

7 Microsoft 53.5 36 Canon 31.5 65 Calvin Klein 12.5 96 SABMiller 5 115 SAMSONITE 0

7 Puma 53.5 38 Stora Enso 30 65 Mars 12.5 96 IBM 5 115 Belle 09 Panasonic 52.5 39 The North Face 28.5 65 Sharp 12.5 96 RIM 5 115 奥康 0

10 M&S 50.5 39 Timberland 28.5 70 ABinBev 11.5 96 海尔 5 115 农夫山泉 0

11 Adidas 49 39 Lee Jeans 28.5 70 International Paper 11.5 96 UPM 5 115 正大 0

12 Burberry 48.5 42 Alcatel 26 72 Carlsberg 11 96 Sears 5 115 HUGO BOSS 0

12 Siemens 48.5 42 Vodafone 26 73 Tesco 10 103 McDonald's 3 115 Abercrombie & Fitch 0

14 Coca-Cola 47 44 Toyota 22.5 73 长城 10 104 Armani 2.5 115 361 度 015 Samsung 46.5 45 KAO 22 73 Singtel 10 104 Fifth and Pacific 2.5 115 Kappa 016 Walmart 45.5 45 Oji Paper 22 73 Benetton 10 104 Next 2.5 115 Guess 016 Nike 45.5 47 Mizuno 21 73 Carrefour 10 104 GUCCI 2.5 115 安踏 018 Target 45 47 Ford 21 73 Ericsson 10 104 AVON 2.5 115 Cortefiel 018 华为 45 47 Honda 21 73 Motorola 10 104 KFC 2.5 115 DKNY 0

18 富士康 45 50 Disney 20.5 73 BT 10 104 Tiffany 2.5 115 Victoria's Secret 0

21 Uniqlo 43 50 SCA 20.5 73 比亚迪 10 111 光明 2 115 Macy's 0

21 Esprit 43 52 Mercedes-Benz 19.5 73 TCL 10 111 双汇 2 115 Kmart 0

23 Unilever 41 53 探路者 19 73 BMW 10 111 蒙牛 2 115 J.C. Penney 0

24 Hitachi 40 54 Sanyo 18 84 中兴 9.5 114 理文造纸 1.5 115 Giordano 0

24 ZARA 40 55 LG 17.5 84 伊利 9.5 115 长安汽车 0 115 Meters/bonwe 0

26 李宁 37.5 56 Cisco 16.5 86 Johnson&Johnson 8 115 小米 0 115 Nine Dragons Paper 0

26 Levi's 37.5 56 Dell 16.5 86 Nestlé 8 115 HTC 0 115 Polo Ralph Lauren 0

28 Nokia 37 58 GM 16 88 Heineken 7.5 115 白猫 0  29 Toshiba 36.5 58 Pepsi 16 88 L'Oréal 7.5 115 两面针 0  30 GE 35.5 60 Intel 15 88 SC Johnson 7.5 115 纳爱斯 0  

Page 30: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果IT Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标 沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收 总分回复跟进 行业污染状况 建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行监测数据

识别主要污染环节 向上游检索 节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品回收

No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 1001 Apple 10 10 12 12 2 7.5 5 2.5 3 1.5 65.52 HP 10 10 6 6 0 5 5 10 0 3 553 Microsoft 10 10 6 12 0 7.5 5 0 3 0 53.54 Panasonic 10 10 6 12 0 5 0 5 0 4.5 52.55 Siemens 10 10 9 12 0 5 2.5 0 0 0 48.56 Samsung 10 10 9 9 0 2.5 0 0 6 0 46.57 华为 10 10 9 6 0 5 5 0 0 0 458 Hitachi 10 10 6 9 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 409 富士康 10 7.5 6 6 0 5 0 5 0 0 39.510 Nokia 10 10 3 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 3711 Toshiba 7.5 7.5 6 9 0 0 0 5 0 1.5 36.512 GE 10 7.5 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.513 联想 10 10 6 3 0 2.5 0 0 0 3 34.513 Philips 10 7.5 9 3 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 34.515 Sony 10 10 3 6 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 31.515 Canon 10 10 3 6 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 31.517 Alcatel 10 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2617 Vodafone 10 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2619 Sanyo 7.5 7.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1820 LG 7.5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.521 Cisco 7.5 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 16.521 Dell 7.5 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 16.523 Intel 7.5 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1524 Sharp 7.5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.525 Singtel 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1025 Ericsson 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1025 Motorola 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1025 BT 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1025 比亚迪 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1025 TCL 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1031 中兴 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 9.532 Seiko Epson 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 6.533 IBM 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

33 RIM-Blackberry 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

33 Haier 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 536 小米 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 HTC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 31: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Textile Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标 沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收 总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 1001 H&M 10 10 12 9 0 5 5 0 9 1.5 61.52 溢达 10 10 12 12 0 7.5 2.5 2.5 3 1.5 613 GAP 10 10 12 9 2 5 5 2.5 0 0 55.53 C&A 10 10 12 6 0 10 5 2.5 0 0 55.55 Puma 10 10 9 6 0 7.5 0 5 6 0 53.56 M&S 10 10 12 6 0 5 0 0 6 1.5 50.57 Adidas 10 10 9 9 0 5 0 0 6 0 498 Burberry 10 10 9 9 0 2.5 2.5 2.5 3 0 48.59 Walmart 10 10 9 9 0 2.5 5 0 0 0 45.59 Nike 10 10 9 9 0 5 2.5 0 0 0 45.511 Target 10 10 12 3 0 5 5 0 0 0 4512 Uniqlo 10 10 12 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 4312 Esprit 10 10 9 9 0 5 0 0 0 0 4314 ZARA 10 10 9 6 0 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 4015 李宁 10 7.5 9 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 37.515 Levi's 10 10 9 6 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 37.517 IKEA 7.5 7.5 9 3 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 1.5 33.518 雅戈尔 10 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 3218 Ann Taylor 7.5 7.5 6 6 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 3220 The North Face 10 10 6 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 28.520 Timberland 10 10 6 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 28.520 Lee Jeans 10 10 6 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 28.523 Mizuno 7.5 7.5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2124 Disney 10 7.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.525 探路者 7.5 2.5 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1926 Lafuma 7.5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.526 Tommy Hilfiger 5 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.526 Calvin Klein 5 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5

Page 32: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Textile Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标 沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收 总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 10029 Tesco 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1029 Benetton 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1029 Carrefour 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1032 Sears 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 533 Armani 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.533 Fifth and Pacific 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.533 Next 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.536 HUGO BOSS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Abercrombie & Fitch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 361° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Kappa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Guess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 安踏 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Cortefiel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 DKNY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Victoria's Secret 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Macy's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Kmart 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 J.C. Penney 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 佐丹奴 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 美特斯邦威 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 036 Polo Ralph Lauren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 33: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Food & Beverage Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标 沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收 总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 1001 CocaCola 10 7.5 9 9 0 5 2.5 2.5 0 1.5 472 Unilever 10 7.5 6 6 0 5 2.5 2.5 0 1.5 413 Pepsi 7.5 0 0 6 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 164 Mars 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 12.55 伊利 5 2.5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 9.56 Nestlé 2.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 87 统一 2.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.57 康师傅 2.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.57 中粮 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 5.510 McDonald's 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 311 KFC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 2.512 光明 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 212 双汇 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 212 蒙牛 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 215 农夫山泉 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 015 正大 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 34: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Household & Personal Care Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收

总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 1001 Unilever 10 7.5 6 6 0 5 2.5 2.5 0 1.5 412 KAO 5 0 3 6 0 0 0 5 3 0 223 P&G 0 0 3 0 0 2.5 0 5 3 0 13.53 立白 7.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.55 Johnson & Johnson 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 3 0 86 L'Oréal 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 7.56 SC Johnson 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 7.58 Colgate-Palmolive 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 5.59 AVON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 2.510 白猫 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 两面针 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 纳爱斯 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 上海家化 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 35: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Automobile Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收

总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 100

1 Toyota 5 5 3 3 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 1.5 22.5

2 Ford 5 5 0 6 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 21

2 Honda 5 5 0 6 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 21

4 Mercedes-Benz 5 5 3 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 1.5 19.5

5 GM 2.5 2.5 0 6 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 16

6 Volkswagen 2.5 2.5 3 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 13

7 长城汽车 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

7 BMW 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 10

9 Hyundai 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 5

10 长安汽车 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 奇瑞 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 36: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Brewery Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收

总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 100

1 青岛啤酒 5 2.5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5

2 ABinBev 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 1.5 11.5

3 Carlsberg 0 0 0 6 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 11

4 Heineken 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 7.5

5 SABMiller 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 5

6 燕京啤酒 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 茅台啤酒 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 37: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Paper Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收

总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 100

1 Stora Enso 7.5 7.5 0 3 2 2.5 2.5 5 0 0 30

2 Oji Paper 7.5 5 0 3 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 1.5 22

3 SCA 5 5 3 0 0 2.5 2.5 2.5 0 0 20.5

4 International Paper 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 1.5 11.5

5 UPM 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 0 5

6 理文造纸 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 1.5

7 玖龙造纸 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 38: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Leather Industry Brand Performance

CITI 评价指标沟通与跟进 合规性与整改行动 延伸绿色供应链 数据披露 责任回收

总分回复跟进 行业污染状况

建立检索机制 推动整改 公布自行

监测数据识别主要污染环节

向上游检索

节能减排目标 PRTR 废弃产品

回收No. 品牌 10 10 12 12 8 10 10 10 12 6 100

1 Puma 10 10 9 6 0 7.5 0 5 6 0 53.5

2 Adidas 10 10 9 9 0 5 0 0 6 0 49

3 Burberry 10 10 9 9 0 2.5 2.5 2.5 3 0 48.5

4 Nike 10 10 9 9 0 5 2.5 0 0 0 45.5

5 李宁 10 7.5 9 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 37.5

6 Timberland 10 10 6 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 28.5

7 Armani 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5

7 GUCCI 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5

7 Tiffany 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5

10 CHANEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 COACH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 SAMSONITE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 Kappa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 安踏 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 361° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 百丽 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 奥康 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 39: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Brand Performance Analysis by Region

长安汽车HTC

两面针上海家化

奇瑞百丽

农夫山泉361 度佐丹奴

玖龙造纸光明蒙牛统一中粮伊利

比亚迪青岛啤酒

探路者联想

富士康华为满分

GreatER china region brand rankings

The performance of brands in the greater China region varies wildly. A few specific brands have outstanding performance but many still haven’t done anything or are only just starting to take action.

Page 40: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Brand Performance Analysis by Region

S A M S O N I T E

A b e r c r o m b i e & F i t c h

G u e s s

D K N Y

V i c t o r i a ' s S e c r e t

M a c y ' s

K m a r t

J . C . P e n n e y

P o l o R a l p h L a u r e n

F i ft h a n d P a c i fi c

A V O N

K F C

T i ff a n y

M c D o n a l d ' s

I B M

R I M - B l a c k b e r r y

S e a r s

C o l g a t e - P a l m o l i v e

S C J o h n s o n

J o h n s o n & J o h n s o n

M o t o r o l a

I n t e r n a ti o n a l P a p e r

T o m m y H i l fi g e r

C a l v i n K l e i n

M a r s

P & G

I n t e l

G M

P e p s i

C i s c o

D e l l

D i s n e y

F o r d

T h e N o r t h F a c e

T i m b e r l a n d

L e e J e a n s

A n n T a y l o r

G E

L e v i ' s

T a r g e t

W a l m a r t

N i k e

C o c a C o l a

M i c r o s o ft

H P

G A P

A p p l e

满 分North American Brand rankings

• A decent proportion of European and American brands have performed particularly well and green procurement in leading industries is making good progress. However, many brands from the food and beverage, household and personal care products, and automobile industries have still failed to actively respond to questions about problems in their supply chains in China.

Page 41: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Brand Performance Analysis by Region

C H A N E LC O A C H

H U G O B O S SK a p p a

C o r t e fi e lA r m a n i

N e x tG U C C I

S A B M i l l e rU P M

H e i n e k e nL ' O r é a lN e s t l é

T e s c oB e n e tt o n

C a r r e f o u rE r i c s s o n

B TB M W

C a r l s b e r gA B i n B e v

L a f u m aV o l k s w a g e n

M e r c e d e s - B e n zS C A

A l c a t e lV o d a f o n e

S t o r a E n s oI K E A

P h i l i p sN o k i aZ A R A

U n i l e v e rB u r b e r r yS i e m e n s

A d i d a sM & S

P u m aC & A

H & M满 分

European brand rankings

• A decent proportion of European and American brands have performed particularly well and green procurement in leading industries is making good progress. However, many brands from the food and beverage, household and personal care products, and automobile industries have still failed to actively respond to questions about problems in their supply chains in China.

Page 42: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

CITI 评价结果Brand Performance Analysis by Region

H y u n d a i

S e i k o E p s o n

S h a r p

L G

S a n y o

M i z u n o

H o n d a

K A O

O j i P a p e r

T o y o t a

S o n y

C a n o n

T o s h i b a

H i t a c h i

U n i q l o

S a m s u n g

P a n a s o n i c

满 分

Japanese & South Korean brand rankings

• Japanese and Korean brands are basically able to answer initial inquiries into supply chain problems in China but many have still yet to go much further.

Page 43: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

• CITI is a quantifiable index and roadmap to help companies green their supply chains.• The CITI is based on collected data and

publicly disclosed information.• Brands need use the power of public

supervision to ensure that their supply chains can meet environmental standards.

Conclusion

Page 44: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

• The government should expand information disclosure and use market oriented measures to push for environmental protection.

• Leverage consumer purchasing power to encourage brands to address environmental pollution problems in their supply chains, thus helping to address some of the environmental challenges faced by China and the wider world.

Conclusion

Page 45: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Pollution Map App

Search up brand scores, environmental

violations, and pollution data

Page 46: Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI)

Thank You! Questions / Comments?