corporate social responsibility and international framework agreement
TRANSCRIPT
Siwen Song| Adeoti Adesanya | Haider Bukhari| Yashodhara Rajaraman | Fengqiong Lu | Yiping Gao | Caoxi He
Distinction between CSR and IFA
Corporate Social Responsibility• Definition • Delivery • Critiques
International Framework Agreement• Background • Definition• Implementation
Definition• Carroll’s Four Part Definition
Philanthropic ResponsibilitiesBe a good corporate citizen.
Ethical ResponsibilitiesBe ethical.
Legal ResponsibilitiesObey the law.
Economic ResponsibilitiesBe profitable.
• CSR encompasses the economic, legal, ethical and discretionary (philanthropic) expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time
Determinants of Effective Delivery
• employees responsiveness
• how it is embedded in organization
• organizational ethics policy
Critiques
•Restricts the free market goal of profit maximization•Business is not equipped to handle social activities•Dilutes the primary aim of business•Increase business power•Limits the ability to compete in a global marketplace
Arguments Against
•Addresses social issues business caused and allows business to be part of the solution•Protects business self-interest•Limits future government intervention•Addresses issues by using business resources and expertise •Addresses issues by being proactive
Arguments For
Background• Mid-1980s / Dnone & the International Union of Food Workers (IUF). • IFAs developed slowly throughout the 1980s and 1990s, but proliferated after 2000.
• $1,015,550,100,000• 3.3 millions
Definition
global agreement
Global Union
Federation
the ILOSix KeySix KeyPointsPoints
Suppliers
Trade Union
complaints
• IFAs are agreements on minimum labor standards negotiated between Global Union Federations and MNEs (Lone, 2005).
• Six key points by IUF/Danone agreements
The Implementation Issue
• Problems 1) deficient dissemination of and knowledge about the agreement 2) hard to influence the suppliers• Achievements1) Forming new union at the Buenos Amigos plantation 2) Improved union-employer relations on Chiquita-owned plantation
Case:
Chiquita COLSIBA
& (Lone,2005)
IFA’s potential has only been exploited to a low degree, and it has a promising future.
Welcome Haider !
Just Listen : )
• Collier, J. and Esteban, R. 2007. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Commitment’, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 19-33.
• Hammer, N. 2005. ‘International Framework Agreements between Rights and Bargaining’, Transfer, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 511-530.
• Herrnstadt, O. 2007.‘Are International Framework Agreements A Path to Corporate Social Responsibility?’ The Journal of Business Law, Vol.10, No. 1, pp187-224.
• Riisgaard, L. 2005. ‘International Framework Agreements: A New Model for Securing Workers’ Rights?’, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 707-737.
• Windsor, D. 2006. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 93-114.