court letter sep

Upload: lambourghini

Post on 04-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    1/11

    IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF COURTCHENGALPET

    O.S. No.282/2009

    1. Thiru. Padmanabhan2. Thiru. Prakash3. Thiru. Suresh - Plaintiffs

    - VS-

    1. State of Tamil Nadu representedBy The Secretary to Government

    Transport Department, Saint George Fort,Chennai 9. - Defendants

    and two others

    WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 1ST DEFENDANT

    1. The suit filed by the plaintiffs for declaration to declare the suit properly

    and permanent injunction as against the dependents is not maintainable in

    law and on facts of the case.

    2. The allegations contained in the plaintiff are hereby specifically denied and

    put the plaintiff to strict proof of the same.

    3. This defendant devices, various allegations contain in the plaint and put to

    the plaintiff to strict proof of the same.

    4. The defendant submits that the Highways and Rural works and National

    Highways are controlled by The secretary, Transport Department,Government of Tamil Nadu since 20 years back. Now Highways and

    National Highways are controlled by The secretary, Highways and minor

    ports, Government of Tamil Nadu St. George Fort Chennai 9.

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    2/11

    5. The defendant submits that the plaintiffs unnecessarily included the first

    defendant as a party in this suit and the first defendant is no way

    connected with this suit.

    6. The defendant submits that the suit is without notice under section 80C.P.C which is not maintainable.

    7. The defendant, submits that there is no cause of action for filing the suit as

    frame the 1st dependent as mis jointer and for the reason of mis jointer the

    suit is not correct.

    8. The defendant submits that the Secretary, Highways and Minor ports,

    Government of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai 9 may be included

    as a first Dependent in this suit in lieu of me. Since he is the necessary

    party in the suit and this control the High way, National Highways and

    Minor Ports.

    9. The defendant is not a necessary party to the suit and this suit is not

    properly described in order and not included the necessary party. Hence

    pray that the suit may be dismissed without cost.

    Secretary TransportGovernment of Tamil Nadu

    Chennai 9.

    DECLARATION

    I Thiru. Age The secretary Transport

    Department Government of Tamil Nadu here by declare that the fact

    stated above are true to the best of my knowledge information, behalf and

    sign this at chengalpattu on .09.2012.

    Secretary TransportGovernment of Tamil Nadu

    Chennai 9.

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    3/11

    IN THE COUR8T OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF COURTCHENGALPET

    O.S. No.282/2009

    1. Thiru. Padmanabhan2. Thiru. Prakash3. Thiru. Suresh - Plaintiffs

    - VS-

    1. State of Tamil Nadu represented.

    By Secretary to GovernmentTransport Department, Saint George Fort,Chennai 9. - Defendants

    and two others

    AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 1ST DEFENDANT

    I Thiru. Age The Secretary, Transport

    Department The Government of TamilNadu, Chennai 9 do hereby solemnly

    afford sincerely as follows.

    1. I am petitioner here in and first defendant in the above suit.

    2. I submit that the above suit was filed by the plaintiff and two others here

    in against Transport Department of The Government of TamilNadu for

    getting the relief of declaration. Due to non filling of written statement I

    was set exparte this is neither willfull nor wanted on. Hence by with filing

    the written statement, hereby I pray that to set aside this exparte order

    passed against me on.

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    4/11

    3. I therefore pray that the Honorable court may be pleased to set aside the

    exparte order passed against me on and to pass such other suitable

    order.

    The Secretary, Transport DepartmentGovernment of Tamil Nadu

    Chennai 9.

    Solemnly affirmed and signed before me at Chengalpattu and day

    of September 2012

    Advocate for defendant

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    5/11

    IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF COURTCHENGALPET

    O.S. No.282/2009

    1. State of Tamil Nadu representedBy the Secretary to GovernmentTransport Department, Saint George Fort, - Petitioner Chennai 9.

    1st Defendant

    - VS -

    1. Thiru. Padmanabhan2. Thiru. Prakash3. Thiru. Suresh - Defendants

    PETITION FILLED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 7 AND SECTION 151 C.P.C

    For the reason stated in the accompany affidavit it is prayed that the

    Honorable court may be please of set aside the exparte order passed against

    the petitioner / on and to pass such other suitable order.

    Dated as Chengalpattu on

    Advocate for defendant

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    6/11

    IN THE COURT OF THEHONORABLEDISTRICT MUNISIF COURTCHENGALPATTU

    1. State of Tamil NadurepresentedBy the Secretary toGovernmentTransport Department, SaintGeorge Fort, -PetitionerChennai 9.

    1st Defendant

    - VS -

    1. Thiru. Padmanabhan2. Thiru. Prakash

    3. Thiru. Suresh

    - Defendants

    PETITION FILLED UNDER ORDER9 RULE 7 AND SECTION 151C.P.C.

    COUNCIL PETITION DEFENDANT

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    7/11

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    8/11

    IN THE COURT OF THEHONORABLEDISTRICT MUNISIF COURTCHENGALPATTU

    AFFIDAVIT FILLED BY THE 1ST

    DEFENDANT SECRETAYTRANSPORT GOVERNMENT OFTAMIL NADU

    COUNCIL PETITION DEFENDANT

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    9/11

    IN THE COURT OF THEHONORABLEDISTRICT MUNISIF COURTCHENGALPATTU

    1. Thiru. Padmanabhan2. Thiru. Prakash3. Thiru. Suresh

    - P laintiffs

    - VS-

    1. State of Tamil NadurepresentedBy The Secretary toGovernmentTransport Department, SaintGeorge Fort,Chennai 9.

    -Defendants

    and two others

    WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BYTHE 1ST DEFENDANT SECRETAYTRANSPORT GOVERNMENT OFTAMIL NADU

    COUNCIL PETITION DEFENDANT

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    10/11

  • 7/30/2019 Court Letter Sep

    11/11

    1. Original Suit No. O.S. No.230/2001

    2. Filed in Alanthur Munsif Court by the petitioner M.K. Ramamoorthy, S/o

    Kandan, Hindu Age 60 . Door No.25, V. Lane Indira Nagar,Chennai 20.

    3. Original Suit dismissed 29.06.2010 in Alanthur Munsif Court.

    4. Applied petition No. A.S. No.15/2010

    5. Petitioner Thiru. M.K. Ramamoorthy, Chennai 20

    6. Defendant 1. Minister of Surface Transport No.1, Palimer Street, New

    Delhi 1.

    2. Chief Engineer H & R W, East course Road, Project

    3. Divisional Engineer H & R W. Saidapet Sub division,

    Chennai 16

    4. Collector of Kancheepuram, Collector office Kancheepuram

    5. Commissioner Chitalapakkam, Chennai

    6. Radha Krishnan, Managing Director, Poonga Restaurant

    Hotel (P) Ltd., and Poonga College, Chennai.

    7. Defendant 7 to 11 son and daughters of

    Thiru. Radha Krishnan.

    Reason of the case pray to alow this appeal to the Honourable Sub court

    Tambaram by setting aside the Judgment and degree.