cred carbon reduction 1 energy science director: hsbc director of low carbon innovation school of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
CRedCarbon Reduction
Energy Science Director: HSBC Director of Low Carbon Innovation
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia
A Stern Warning
24th May 2007
Keith Tovey (杜伟贤 ) M.A., PhD, CEng, MICE, CEnvCRed
The Zicer building, its construction and performance and other Low Carbon Strategies at UEA.
4
Low Energy Educational Buildings
Elizabeth Fry Building
ZICER
Nursing and Midwifery
School
Medical School
Medical School Phase 2
5
The Elizabeth Fry Building 1994
8
Cost ~6% more but has heating requirement ~25% of average building at time.
Building Regulations have been updated: 1994, 2002, 2006, but building outperforms all of these.
Runs on a single domestic sized central heating boiler.
Would have scored 13 out of 10 on the Carbon Index Scale.
6
Conservation: management improvements –
Careful Monitoring and Analysis can reduce energy consumption.
0
50
100
150
200
250
Elizabeth Fry Low Average
kWh/
m2/
yr
gas
electricity
thermal comfort +28%User Satisfaction
noise +26%
lighting +25%
air quality +36%
A Low Energy Building is also a better place to work in
7
ZICER Building
Heating Energy consumption as new in 2003 was reduced by further 57% by careful record keeping, management techniques and an adaptive approach to control.
Incorporates 34 kW of Solar Panels on top floor
Low Energy Building of the Year Award 2005 awarded by the Carbon Trust.
8
The ZICER Building - Description
• Four storeys high and a basement• Total floor area of 2860 sq.m• Two construction types
Main part of the building
• High in thermal mass • Air tight• High insulation standards • Triple glazing with low emissivity
~ U – value ~ 1.0 W m2 K-1
9
The ground floor open plan office
The first floor open plan office
The first floor cellular offices
10
• Top floor is an exhibition area – also to promote PV
• Windows are semi transparent
• Mono-crystalline PV on roof ~ 27 kW in 10 arrays
• Poly- crystalline on façade ~ 6/7 kW in 3 arrays
ZICER Building
Photo shows only part of top
Floor
11Air enters the internal
occupied space
Return stale air is extracted from each floor
Incoming air into
the AHU
Regenerative heat exchanger
Filter Heater
The air passes through hollow
cores in the ceiling slabs
The return air passes through the heat
exchanger
Out of the building
Operation of the Main Building• Mechanically ventilated that utilizes hollow core ceiling slabs as supply air ducts to the space
Space for future chilling
Recovers 87% of Ventilation Heat Requirement.
12
Importance of the Hollow Core Ceiling Slabs
The concrete hollow core ceiling slabs are used to store heat and coolness at different times of the year to provide comfortable and stable temperatures
Cold air
Cold air
Draws out the heat accumulated during
the dayCools the slabs to act as a cool store the following day
Summer night
night ventilation/ free cooling
13
Importance of the Hollow Core Ceiling Slabs
The concrete hollow core ceiling slabs are used to store heat and coolness at different times of the year to provide comfortable and stable temperatures
Warm air
Warm air
Pre-cools the air before entering the
occupied space
The concrete absorbs and stores
the heat – like a radiator in reverse
Summer day
14
Importance of the Hollow Core Ceiling Slabs
The concrete hollow core ceiling slabs are used to store heat and coolness at different times of the year to provide comfortable and stable temperatures
Winter Day
The concrete slabs absorbs and
store heat
Heat is transferred to the air before entering
the room
Winter day
15
Importance of the Hollow Core Ceiling Slabs
The concrete hollow core ceiling slabs are used to store heat and coolness at different times of the year to provide comfortable and stable temperatures
Winter NightWhen the internal air temperature drops, heat stored in the
concrete is emitted back into the room
Winter night
16
Performance of ZICER Building
• Initially performance was poor• Performance improved with new Management Strategy
20052004
EFry
ZICER
New Management
17
The Energy Signature from the Old and the New Heating Strategies
0
200
400
600
800
1000
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Mean external temperature over a 24 hour period (degrees C)
Hea
tin
g an
d h
ot-w
ater
co
nsu
mp
tion
(k
Wh
/day
)
New Heating Strategy Original Heating Strategy
The space heating consumption has reduced by 57%
800
350
Acknowledgement: Charlotte Turner
Good Management has reduced Energy Requirements
18
Effect of New Control Strategies on Thermal Comfort
Number Mean Vote Number Mean Vote
2004 224 0.10 352 0.12
2005 256 0.12 273 0.44
Winter Summer
Only data for relevant Metabolic Rates included in above table
0
10
20
30
40
50
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Actual Vote
Per
cen
tage
Year 2
Year 1
Winter
0
10
20
30
40
50
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Actual Vote
Per
cent
age
Year 1
Year 2
Summer
19
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
(Jan ) 1 (Mar) 11 (May) 21 (Aug) 31 (Oct) 41 (Dec) 51
Time (week number)
Ele
ctri
city
use
d/ge
nera
ted
(kW
h)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
PV
per
cent
age
of th
e to
tal e
lect
rici
ty u
sage
Electricity from conventional sources PV electricity PV % of total
Performance of PV cells on ZICER
20
Arrangement of Cells on Facade
Individual cells are connected horizontally
As shadow covers one column all cells are inactive
If individual cells are connected vertically, only those cells actually in shadow are affected.
21
Use of PV generated energy
Sometimes electricity is exportedInverters are only 91% efficient
Most use is for computers
DC power packs are inefficient typically less than 60% efficientNeed an integrated approach
Peak output is 34 kW
22
Actual Situation excluding Grant
Actual Situation with Grant
Discount rate 3% 5% 7% 3% 5% 7%
Unit energy cost per kWh (£) 1.29 1.58 1.88 0.84 1.02 1.22
Avoided cost exc. the Grant
Avoided Costs with Grant
Discount rate 3% 5% 7% 3% 5% 7%
Unit energy cost per kWh (£) 0.57 0.70 0.83 0.12 0.14 0.16
Grant was ~ £172 000 out of a total of ~ £480 000
Performance of PV cells on ZICER
Cost of Generated Electricity
23
EngineGenerator
36% Electricity
50% Heat
GAS
Engine heat Exchanger
Exhaust Heat
Exchanger
11% Flue Losses3% Radiation Losses
86%
efficient
Localised generation makes use of waste heat.
Reduces conversion losses significantly
Conversion efficiency improvements – Building Scale CHP
61% Flue Losses
36%
efficient
24
Conversion efficiency improvements
1997/98 electricity gas oil Total
MWh 19895 35148 33
Emission factor kg/kWh 0.46 0.186 0.277
Carbon dioxide Tonnes 9152 6538 9 15699
Electricity Heat
1999/2000
Total site
CHP generation
export import boilers CHP oil total
MWh 20437 15630 977 5783 14510 28263 923Emission
factorkg/kWh -0.46 0.46 0.186 0.186 0.277
CO2 Tonnes -449 2660 2699 5257 256 10422
Before installation
After installation
This represents a 33% saving in carbon dioxide
25
Energy Conversion efficiency improvements
Load Factor of CHP Plant at UEA
Demand for Heat is low in summer: plant cannot be used effectively
More electricity could be generated in summer
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000CHP
Import
Export
1999 - 00 2000 - 01 2001 - 02 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05
Performance of UEA CHP plant
26
Compressor
Conversion efficiency improvements
Condenser
Evaporator
Throttle Valve
Heat rejected
Heat extracted for cooling
High TemperatureHigh Pressure
Low TemperatureLow Pressure
Heat from external source
Absorber
Desorber
Heat Exchanger
W ~ 0
Normal ChillingAdsorption Chilling
27
A 1 MW Adsorption chiller
1 MW 吸附冷却器
• Adsorption Heat pump uses Waste Heat from CHP
• Will provide most of chilling requirements in summer
• Will reduce electricity demand in summer
• Will increase electricity generated locally
• Save 500 – 700 tonnes Carbon Dioxide annually
28
As Built 209441GJ
Air Conditioned 384967GJ
Naturally Ventilated 221508GJ
Life Cycle Energy Requirements of ZICER as built compared to other buildings of same size and design
Materials Production
Materials Transport
On site construction energy
Workforce Transport
Intrinsic Heating / Cooling energy
Functional Energy
Refurbishment Energy
Demolition Energy
28%54%
34%51%
61%
29%
Main TermoDeck Building only
29
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Years
GJ
ZICER
Naturally Ventilated
Air Conditrioned
Life Cycle Energy Requirements of ZICER compared to other buildings
Compared to the Air-conditioned office, ZICER as built recovers extra energy required in construction in under 1 year.
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Years
GJ
ZICER
Naturally Ventilated
Air Conditrioned
30
Conclusions• Buildings built to low energy standards have cost ~ 5% more,
but savings have recouped extra costs in around 5 years.
• Ventilation heat requirements can be large and efficient heat recovery is important.
• Effective adaptive energy management can reduce heating energy requirements in a low energy building by 50% or more.
• Photovoltaic cells need to take account of intended use of electricity use in building to get the optimum value.
• Building scale CHP can reduce carbon emissions significantly
• Adsorption chilling should be included to ensure optimum utilisation of CHP plant, to reduce electricity demand, and allow increased generation of electricity locally.
• Promoting Awareness can result in up to 25% savings
• The Future for UEA: Biomass CHP? Wind Turbines?
Lao Tzu (604-531 BC) Chinese Artist and Taoist philosopher
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading."
31
A Stern Warning 24th May 2007
The Zicer building, its construction and performance and other Low Carbon Strategies at UEA.
Keith Tovey (杜伟贤 ) Energy Science Director HSBC Director of Low Carbon Innovation
Acknowledgement: Charlotte TurnerCRed
Carbon Reduction
CRed
This presentation is now accessible on the WEB at:
www2.env.uea.ac.uk/cred/creduea.htm
see also www.cred-uk.org