crew foia 2014-006851-0000765

Upload: crew

Post on 01-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    1/19

    Correspondence Management System

    Control Number: AX-14-000-8367

    Printing Date: April 22 2014 08:14:10

    Citizen Information

    Citizen/Originator: Plaza John

    Organization: lmperium Renewables, Inc.

    Address: 17

    41

    First Avenue South, Third Floor, Seattle,

    WA

    98134

    Phillips Jonathan

    Organization: Renewable Biofuels Incorporated

    Address: 4601 Washington Avenue, 260, Houston, TX 77007-5471

    Beirne Martin D

    Organization:

    Address:

    Green Earth Fuels

    of

    Houston

    550 Clinton Drive, Galena Park, TX 77547

    Van

    Heuvelen Robert

    Organization: VH Strategies, LLC

    Address: 300 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001

    Constituent: N/A

    Committee: N/A

    Sub-Committee:

    N/A

    Control Information

    Control Number:

    Status:

    Due Date:

    Letter Date:

    Addressee:

    Contact Type:

    Signature:

    File Code:

    Subject:

    Instructions:

    Instruction Note:

    General Notes:

    CC:

    AX-14-000-8367

    Pending

    May 6 2014

    Apr18 2014

    AD-Administrator

    Alternate Number:

    Closed Date:

    of

    Extensions:

    Received Date:

    Addressee Org:

    N/A

    N/A

    Apr 21, 2014

    EPA

    EML (E-Mail)

    Priority Code:

    Normal

    DX-Direct Reply Signature Date: N/A

    404-141-02-01_141 _b Controlled and Major Corr. Record copy

    of

    the offices

    of

    Division

    Directors and other personnel.

    ORF - Daily Reading File -Application by CARBIO, et al. on behalf of biodiesel companies

    from Argentina related to the Alternative Renewable Biomass Tracking Requirement

    DX-Respond directly to this citizen's questions, statements, or concerns

    N/A

    N/A

    OEAEE - Office

    of

    External Affairs and Environmental Education

    OECA - OECA -- Immediate Office

    R1 - Region 1 -- Immediate Office

    R10 - Region 10 -- Immediate Office

    R6 - Region 6 -- Immediate Office

    Lead Information

    Lead Author: N/A

    Lead Assignments:

    Assigner

    Office Assignee

    Assigned Date Due Date Complete Date

    Brenda Salvador OEX OAR

    Apr22 2014

    May 6 2014 N/A

    Instruction:

    DX-Respond directly to this citizen's questions, statements, or concerns

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    2/19

    April 18, 2014

    The Honorable Gina McCarthy

    Administrator

    Environmental Protection Agency

    1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,

    W

    Room 3000

    Washington, DC 20460

    Re: Application by CARBIO, et al. on behalf ofbiodiesel companies from Argentina related

    to

    the Alternative Renewable Biomass Tracking Requirement (40 C.F.R. §80.1454(h))

    Dear Administrator McCarthy:

    As the three largest independent biodiesel producers in the United States, we are writing to

    express our deep concern about the process by which the Environmental Protection Agency is

    evaluating a petition submitted by CARBIO, the trade association representing Argentine

    biodiesel producers, which seeks approval ofArgentine biodiesel as a qualifying fuel under the

    RFS2. Our three companies alone have a combined annual name-plate production capacity

    of

    over 325 million gallons, inclusive

    of

    the Renewable Biofuels facility in Port Neches, Texas,

    Imperium Grays Harbor in Washington State, and Green Earth Fuels ofHouston facility in

    Galena Park, Texas.

    Approval ofArgentine biodiesel under the RFS2 could have devastating impacts on the

    environment and the domestic biodiesel industry. We strongly believe that the CARBIO

    application needs

    to

    undergo a thorough and transparent review process, including a public

    comment period, before any determination EPA would make on this new feedstock approval.

    We believe that this transparency

    s

    vital to ensure that the domestic biodiesel industry is not

    negatively impacted by foreign producers who are heavily subsidized and not subject to as

    stringent regulations in their home countries. We also have grave concerns about foreign

    biodiesel producers ' ability to meet the more stringent U.S. recordkeeping requirements

    presently required for domestic and Canadian feedstocks under the RFS2. These recordkeeping

    requirements are, as you know, the essential element to make sure that the rules are enforceable

    and that the RFS2 GHG reductions are met. Further, we do not believe that EPA has the ability,

    the resources, or the capacity to inspect and enforce compliance

    of

    these foreign entities. Just a

    few of our concerns are included herein:

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000076

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    3/19

    • The direct and indirect land use impacts o Argentine biodiesel production need to be

    examined, particularly

    i

    CARBIO is seeking approval

    o

    an alternative tracking

    requirement;

    • The ability o CARBIO producers

    to

    properly segregate soy beans that are grown along

    the Parami River in Brazil and Paraguay from Argentinean soy beans at the crushing

    facilities located in Argentina used for qualifying RIN generation;

    • Argentine biodiesel is being heavily subsidized by the Argentine government for export,

    with a Differential Export T ax that encourages the export

    o

    finished biodiesel rather

    than soybean oil, which threatens to significantly undercut U.

    effectively undermine the viability

    o

    the domestic biodiesel industry;

    S

    production and

    • The Quality Assurance Program has not been finalized, leaving it unclear how EPA

    intends to address RFS2 compliance by foreign producers; and,

    • The potential impact

    o

    large volumes

    o

    subsidized Argentine biodiesel is not being

    adequately factored into the proposed RVO

    o

    1.28 billion gallons for biomass-based

    biodiesel in 2014 and 2015.

    The land use conversion issues are

    o

    great concern to us, and should receive a thorough vetting

    by the EPA. t is our understanding that the Argentine producers use soybean feedstock from not

    only Argentina, but also from Paraguay, Brazil, and other countries as well. CARBIO and the

    Argentine government are not in a position to monitor, let alone regulate, land use in other

    nations, and deforestation

    o

    tropical rainforests in South America continues

    to

    be a major

    environmental problem with global impacts.

    This is no small matter: the Argentine biodiesel industry produces up to one billion gallons o

    biodiesel each year, and we anticipate that up to 600 million gallons or more ofbiodiesel from

    Argentina will make its way to the U.S.

    i

    this application

    is

    approved, displacing U.S.

    production that has met the more stringent RFS2 feedstock requirements.

    Additionally,

    i

    EPA approves the application, we know that import volumes would be

    significant because Argentina supports its domestic biodiesel program with a cost-distorting

    Differential Export Tax program that would allow each gallon ofbiodiesel from Argentina

    to

    enter the United States at prices lower than biodiesel produced in the U.S. Out

    o

    concern for its

    own domestic biodiesel producers, the European

    Union has already imposed anti-dumping duties

    on Argentine biodiesel as a result

    o

    this Differential Export Tax, effectively shutting Argentine

    biodiesel out

    o

    the EU market and leaving the U.S. market open

    to

    a flood

    o

    subsidized

    Argentine biodiesel imports.

    U.S. biodiesel producers deserve an even playing field, and we urge the EPA to provide the

    public with notice and an opportunity

    to comment prior to approving any such major

    modification

    o

    the RFS2 rules. This is particularly important in light

    o

    recent events that may

    not have been contemplated under the RFS2 proposed rule, and the lack o meaningful guidance

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000076

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    4/19

    provided

    to

    the public

    as

    to how EPA might implement a consortium approach overseas. We

    believe that the implementation and enforcement

    o

    the program must be transparent to ensure

    compliance. The public, in addition to EPA, should be able to monitor compliance. We also

    believe the EPA must ensure that any survey plan approved under Section 80.1454(h) is

    designed to achieve at least the same level

    o

    quality assurance required under the individual

    tracking program and the aggregate compliance approach.

    In addition, EPA needs to factor in the impact

    o

    this potential approval on the existing biodiesel

    industry, particularly since EPA is proposing to maintain the

    2013 RVO

    o

    1.28 billion gallons

    for biomass-based diesel through both 2014 and 2015. t is our estimate that approval o

    Argentine biodiesel could result in the annual import

    o

    almost 6 00 million gallons ofbiomass

    based diesel from Argentina. The challenge to domestic biodiesel producers is already mounting:

    (i) a carry-over o approximately 300 million D-4 RINs from 2013; (ii) a proposed, stagnant

    RVO for biodiesel in 2014 and 2015; and, a proposed reduction in the advanced biofuels RVO.

    Add to these a flood o imports from Argentina, and the continued viability o the domestic

    biodiesel industry is put into serious question. With the allowance o these Argentine imports,

    the U.S. will effectively be trading dependence on foreign fossil fuels for dependence on foreign

    and unfairly subsidized renewable fuels.

    Again, we urge the EPA

    to

    take a comprehensive look at the potential impact

    o

    the Argentine

    petition,

    to allow for public comment on the petition and land use impacts, and to ensure that

    compliance with the stringent standards o the RFS2

    is

    upheld. Otherwise, support for the entire

    program will be undermined, which we know is not the EPA' s intent.

    We appreciate your leadership on this issue, and on efforts to help the United States lower its

    carbon footprint and move to a more sustainable future.

    Sincerely,

    John Plaza Jonathan Phillips Martin D Beirne, III

    CEO, Imperium Renewables COO, Renewable Biofuels Inc. CEO, Green Earth

    Fuels o Houston

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000076

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    5/19

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    6/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    7/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    8/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    9/19

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    10/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    11/19

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    12/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    13/19

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    14/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    15/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000077

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    16/19

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    17/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000078

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    18/19

    CREW FOIA 2014 006851 000078

  • 8/9/2019 CREW FOIA 2014-006851-0000765

    19/19