critical design review 02/02/ 2012 project phoenix 2011-2012 the pennsylvania state university
DESCRIPTION
Critical Design Review 02/02/ 2012 Project Phoenix 2011-2012 The Pennsylvania State University. Presenters. Russell Moore – Project Manager Brian Taylor – Systems Engineer Matt Hanna – Structures & Aerodynamics Lead Tony Maurer – Structures & Aerodynamics Lead - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Critical Design Review02/02/ 2012
Project Phoenix 2011-2012The Pennsylvania State University
2
• Russell Moore – Project Manager• Brian Taylor – Systems Engineer• Matt Hanna – Structures & Aerodynamics Lead• Tony Maurer – Structures & Aerodynamics Lead• Heather Dawe – Propulsion Lead• Rob Algazi – Propulsion Lead• Adam Covino – Payload Lead• Brian Lani – Payload Lead• Eric Gilligan – Avionics & Recovery Lead• Lawrence Digirolamo – Avionics & Recovery Lead• Tom Letarte – Safety Officer
Presenters
3
• Overview• Structures & Aerodynamics• Avionics & Recovery• Propulsion• Payload• Safety and Quality Assurance• Outreach• Conclusion
Discussion Topics
4
• Rocket is 92.2” in length, 4.5” in diameter (OD)- 4.375” (ID)- and weighs 29 lbs.
• Uses machined fin brackets, motor retainer and tail cone. • Recovery System is Single Ejection (CO2)/Dual Deployment
Overview (Project/Vehicle)
5
Fin Bracket
• Allows for easy replacement of damaged fins
• Allows experimentation of fin design (to alter the CP and therefore Static Stability)
• CNC machined aluminum– No epoxy or other permanent
bond• Screws into fin and through
body tube
6
Motor Retainer
• Machined Aluminum forward motor retainer
• Attaches to motor casing
• Screwed into airframe– No epoxy or other
permanent bonds• Acts as an Av bay aft
bulk plate
7
Tail Cone
• CNC machined aluminum aft motor retainer
• Reduces drag up to 50% for subsonic flight [1]
• Threads onto aft of booster section– No epoxy or other permanent
bonds• Opens up more room in
airframe
8
Structures
• Rocket Flight Static Stability– 1.4
• Current Simulated Mass: 29.3 pounds
• Mass Margin: 2.6 pounds• Predicted Drift
Predicted drift as a function of wind speed for the current mass estimate (483 ounces).
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 220
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
425
930
1480
2425
Wind Speed (mph)
Pred
icted
Drift
(ft)
9
• Motor choice: AMW L777
• Thrust-to-weight ratio: 5.96 (average)
• Rail exit velocity: 55.25 ft/s
Propulsion
10
Full Scale Motor: Animal Works L777 (75mm)• Determined By Open Rocket Models
Propulsion
11
Sub-Scale Motor: Aerotech J315 (54mm)• Determined By Open Rocket Models
Propulsion
12
Full Scale Contingency Motor: Cesaroni L935
Propulsion
13
Full Scale Contingency Motor: Cesaroni L935
Propulsion
14
– Main Parachute: Fruity Chutes 84” Iris Ultra– Drogue Parachute: Rocketman 3’ Ballistic Mach II Chute– Recovery Harness: 50’ of ½” tubular Kevlar– Altimeters: 2x PerfectFlite StratoLogger– Down-body Camera: PD80– Recovery Aids:• Garmin Astro DC-20 GPS System• BeepX Sonic Beacon
Avionics & Recovery
15
Sled and Bay Design
Avionics & Recovery
BeepX Sonic BeaconAltimeters
BeepX 12V 23A Battery
CO2 Canister
9V BatteryHolders
BP Ejection Canister
CD3 EjectionSystem
Switches
Note: Aft Bulkhead is actually an aluminum bulkhead that interfaces with the motor casing and screws into the airframe
16
–Apogee• CD3 CO2 ejection device• Black powder ejection charge• Drogue is released and main is held within the airframe by the main parachute containment harness.
–750 ft AGL• Tender Descender releases the main and the drogue pulls it out of the airframe and deployment bag
Avionics & Recovery
– Descent Rate• 64 ft/s under drogue• 15 ft/s under main
– Kinetic Energy• Booster Section: 73.8 ft-lbs• Nosecone/Payload: 15.6 ft-lbs
Avionics & Recovery
18
– Altimeter test• Tested functionality of altimeters and ability to fire e-matches
– CD3 independent test• Tested stand-alone functionality of CD3 system
– Sub-scale ground test• Tested the ability of the CD3 system to eject the nosecone
Avionics & Recovery
PayloadNASA SMD Mission Payload:• Measure atmospheric parameters• Will collect following data:– Pressure– Temperature– Relative Humidity– Solar Irradiance– Ultra-violet Radiation
Payload
Name Model QuantityUltra-Violet Light Sensor SU-110 2
Logomatic v2 Serial SD Datalogger WIG-10216 2Arduino Pro 3.3V/ 8Mhz DEV-09221 2
Polymer Lithium Ion Battery - 2000mAh PRT-08483 2XBee Pro 900 XSC Wire Antenna WRL-09085 1
4GB microSD Card SDSDQ-4096-E11M 2High Altitude Sensing Board SEN-09944 2
~Ambient Light Sensor TEMT-6000 2~Humidity Sensor HIH-4030 2~Pressure Sensor BMP-085 2~Accelerometer ADXl345 2
~Temperature Sensor TMP-102 2
Arduino Control
Data Logger
Power Supply
HASB
Light Sensor
Arduino Control
Data Logger
Power Supply
HASB
Light Sensor
900MHz Transmitter
Payload
PayloadScientific Value:• Analyze collected information to
profile atmospheric boundary layer
• Determine stability and depth of atmospheric boundary layer
• Construct a Skew-T diagram of the boundary layer as visual aid to determine weather severity [www.met.psu.edu]
23
• CO2 Canisters for CD3 System– Manufactured to
UL1191 Standard– Burst pressure:
7000psi– 75% Fill– 30 min @ 100 ⁰C,
15min @ 150 ⁰C
Safety & Quality AssurancePressure vs %Fill for varying Temperature
24
Safety & Quality Assurance
Subsystem Component Verification Test
Structures
Shear Pins Ground Testing (Feb.)
Forward Motor Retainer
Static Fire (Feb.)
Avionics & Recovery Recovery System Ground Testing (Feb.)
Propulsion Motor Static Fire (Feb.)
25
• Verification Testing as in explained in Appendix D: Test Matrix (February)
• MDRA Launch (March 10-11)• METRA Launch (March 24)• FRR (March 26)
Upcoming Milestones
26
• Discovery Space Museum Workshops– January 27, February 8 & 22, March 21
• Spikes Fest– February 12
• Park Forest Middle School STEM Fair– March 14
Educational Engagement
27
Section TotalFull Scale $ 4,546.23 Subscale $ 2,612.09 Testing $ 1,040.66 Ground Support Equipment $ 2,461.91 Travel $ 3,815.00 Outreach $ 248.98 Total $ 14,724.87
Expenses
Subsystem TotalStructures & Aerodynamics $ 1,853.99 Avionics & Recovery $ 975.31 Payload $ 1,266.93 Propulsion $ 450.00 Total $ 4,546.23
Overall Club Expenses Full Scale Rocket Expenses by Subsystem
28
Conclusion
• Tests show that rocket is structurally sound and ejection/internal circuitry works.
• Further testing for drogue parachute size, landing radius distance, and motor performance.
29
[1] Fleeman, l.E., Tactical Missile Design – Second Edition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., VA 2006[2] www.fruitychutes.com[3] www.apogeerockets.com[4] www.met.psu.edu[5] www.wildmanrocketry.com[6] www.pro38.com[7] www.giantleaprocketry.com[8] www.eurorocketry.org
References