cst sum task 2b

8/9/2019 CST SUM Task 2B

1/6

Chris Rose

CST SUM Task 2B

Reasoning and Problem Solving CST1

Western Governors University

CST SUM Task 2B

When it comes to discussing a topic as tough as the one selected, immigration,

opinions and beliefs become a big part of answering the question. Also, with a tough

openended question assumptions can play a big part in the answer. But which factor is

more important when it comes down to finding an answer? That question cannot be

answered until every single factor is talked about. Another simple factor will make its

presence felt in any essay. This factor is the point of view of all the responders to a

chosen topic. Among all of the previously mentioned factors which one tops them all.

With all of these factors coming into play how does somebody able to write an essay

answering a very in-depth subject? In order to relate everything together and make the

topics a strong part of an essay a lot of thought and reflection is required to relate all the

topics together for the paper to become written. With all of these factors and elements to

a subject how can an essay be written to answer a certain question to that subject? It

requires a lot of analyzing and evaluating.

Upon answering an in-depth and tough question a person must use their own brain

and really ponder the question at hand. At the beginning of the process of answering the

question your own assumptions can answer the question easily. But, this really classified

as a real answer? In order to really answer a question a process of thought is required.

This process of thought needs to evolve to also include others. When answering the


2/6

question with your own beliefs, opinions, assumptions, etc., then you are thinking never

really evolves. For this evolution to happen others assumptions must be a part of the

answer. An evolution of my own thinking rose while answering the question. As I work

through the essay I not only read and gathered others assumptions, but I reflected on

them, analyzed them, evaluated them. This is the first essay I found myself sitting down

after working on a peper and go into an in-depth, reflection on the information just

processed. My thinking also evolved by working through all assumptions presented

analyzing and evaluating them as well. At the completion of writing the essay my

thinking evolved from just reading found reserached information and assumptions to

thoroughly analyzing and evaluating that information found. It is amazing how much one

persons thinking can evolve during one analytical essay.

A first glance at any question a response is easily reached, but that response is

not entirely fair due to the observers own poit of view on the subject. With my chosen

subject being immigration my mind was already made up on a solution, because of tmy

own point of view. Py point of view was to eliminate he growing amount of outsiders in

any way possible, including forcing them out of the country one by one. Many other

citizens share this same view, although the view doesnt always change. This rarely

happens, but my point of view had a tweak in the change department in the end. At first,

my opinion was a little on the harsh side with the whole elimination part. When it came

down to it my point of view converted into believing the growing population could be

managed, without having the immigratns leave the country all together. After viewng

different resources and their solutions presented, in my eyes, a guest worker program


3/6

would result in reducing the troubles of immigration. That way anther disaser in this

country is averted. Point of views are extremely important in solving a problem, despite

the fact that thy can change. Someimes a change is for the better rather than the worse. In

this case change is exactly what solving this problem needs.

Once a problem is presented to different opinionated groups a caos of solutions

arises. There are several ways to go about to make sure each solutions and resource

presented is both prepared and thorough. One way to go about this process is to start by

gathering every piece of information on the topic/problem and the solutions. Next, reflect

on your own beliefs, opinions, assumptions, etc., on the subject to come up with your

own point of view. After having a this point of view on the topic the next step is to

analyze every piece of information gathered on the subject. For this process to be

successful every solution, belief, opinion, assumption, etc., must be dissected. Upon

completion of anyalyzing the information picking two fesasible solutions is the next step,

whether it contradicts the previous point of view or not. Reducing the solutions dwn to

two allows a more accurate and meticulous evaluation and solvent. Evaluating both of

those explications is the next step in the resolution method. Every single rock msut be

turned over, not rock is left unturned, to get to the final step in the solution procedure.

This final step is to pick a solution or answer to the question that in your own

point of view would be successful. The proces previously explained is the process use,

was the process used, to formulate a reasoned clarification. Following this standard

procedure allows for the resolution to be both well evaluated and a success. Being asked

if there could be more information needed, there is no such thing as enough information

on a toppic. More information presented to any observer is better, although if the


4/6

previous method of elimination is strictly followed not much more acquired facts is

needed. This way, the person answering the question knows for a fact that they have the

best most thorough answer to the inquiry that could be presented.

Reflecting on the style taken to find the best solution, my point of view changed

but my solution stayed on the same path. After evaluating all the sources that presented

solvents three really stood out to me. Crunching the evidence and knowledge that was

within my mind there was no doubt that tow of those solutions could be combined to

present the ultimate clarification. This explicationwould cover every single outleting

problem bestowed upon us by the obstacle. Every dilemma conferred by the material

would be covered. Just like any great goalie, anything shot at me is deflected away from

the goal. Who can argue with those results?

Upon analyzing and evaluating a problem that needs a solution to be given, most

of the time, that solution brought up is stuck with. Even though, there are times where

solutions are changed during the reduction procedure. This is how it went for my process

of finding a solution. At first the resolution that was backed was eliminating the

immigrants from the country. In reality this solvent seems to be a bit extreme and

unlikely to be a success. There is not possible way of removing every single immigrant

from the country one by one until the problems are reduced to nothing. After further

evaluation my solution changed to a guest worker program and detenion method

combining. With these two combining every problem will be handled. It is also cheaper

than any other clarification presented by all the resources studied. The best part of the

selected solution is the fact that it is very realistic, manageable, affordable and successful.

With all the problems presented by the selected subject it is amazing after all the


5/6

anaylzing and evaluating that a simple act of combining two solutions together would be

the best plausible outlet.

Once again, this is thanks to following the elimination procedure bit by bit

without outleting to another process. If everyone were to follow the strict methods

previously explained than each and every single one of them could find a credible

solution to an underlying problem. The final solution that was bestowed by myself

resulted in being the most successful and feasible answer to the obstacle at hand. It is

amazing how much more rewarding looking thoroughly into a topic can change the entire

outcome of a dilemma.

Obviously every situation has a solution. How you reach each solution is

different. By analyzing the question and investigating each possible answer everyone can

commit to one single resource that has a successful propisition to the underlying

dilemma. As long as they come up with a convenient yet thorough answer than nothing

but success will follow. Putting a little extra thought into a subject will cause nothing but

positives to come raining down. Not one person give any credit to the methods of in-

depth analyzing and evaluating until they do it. After following these simple steps

everything fits into place a lot easier and answering a very difficult question becomes an

easy task. Like the statement that was said before, the more information the better. This

statement should always be in the back of the mind of anybody righting an essay on any

subject. No essay can be written without evidence. Also, no essay can be written without

point of views, opinions, beliefs, etc. Combining all of these separate parts to write an

essay would make it much simpler. It would also make the paper much more organized

and precise. If a paper is very organized and precise the people reading it will be able to


6/6

understand the persons writing a lot easier. The paper is much more clearer if it follows

these guidelines. No matter what the subject is to be written about, following these simple

guidelines and steps will result in anybody being able to write an essay on anything.

Doing what was previously stated I find that I can reahc the best solutions to any single

problem that could be presented to me.

cst sum task 2b

Documents