de i g of load bearing brickwork systems

24
.. DE I G OF L OAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS WG KAMARUDIN BIN AWG JAP T Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2000 TA 679 A965 2000

Upload: others

Post on 13-Nov-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

DE I G OF L OAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

WG KAMARUDIN BIN AWG JAP T

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak 2000

TA 679 A965 2000

Pu I KhfdrttJc M ~

DESIG OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK YSTEMS

by

AWG KAMARUDIN AWG JAPOT

A thesis submitted to Faculty of Engineering Univcrsiti MalaysIa amwak

as a partial fulfillment of the reqUirements for the degree of Bachelor or Engineering (T Ions

(CIVtl Engmeenng) 2000

Bonmg Pnyhn Ts IIDiYnii 101) 5 Saraa

RI3a

BORA G PpoundNYERADAN lUIS

Judul DESIGI Of LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYS nMS

SESI PENGMIAN 199712000

Saya ______________~~~W~G4bK~A~~~1~A~R~J~1~)~ns~A~vv~G~IA~rQ~T_______________________ (RURlfF BESAR)

1 mcngnhU mtmbcnarlan liSJS Inl dlSlmpan dJ Pusal KhLdmat Maklumal UnlClSlll Miln~SHl Sanv--a~ dcngun I aratmiddotsy ra kegunan sepfU benllJl

I HkmiliJlt ertas proJek dalah di bah nama pcnullS mcl pcnUllSOl1 bGill projek bcrsllDlJl dan wb oteh IMA~o haklUlhbIa adaJnh kcpun3an UNIMAS

2 Noskah satman dt datam bltntuk kcrus au nukro hM)B bolell dJbuo dcn~Dn elgtltn benuli dlnpada pcIluhs

J Pus Khdm bullbull Mmlum Akademl UNtMAS dJbellarbn mmbWlt salman UDlU JgtC11gJDn mere 4 Ken prolek haD) boleb dllemtkan dellSn IcbenlUllll paIulis aaYMon TO)I adth meng kdAr ong

dt~uJw etak bull S~YI embatarknnludflt ruemben3Jlnn Pcrpusbkuan IllmlbuDt salman Icrta proJd 101 sebagai bnbun penuknran dJ aruara UlSU(U~1 pcngaJlon hnampgl bullbull SII lilndakan ( )

D SulIT 1tllgadunl~ maIJlJIDal ~ 1Itg berdat]l1h 1j~elamDlan Ilt4U Icpcnungan Mf~ cpen yang tcrmaruh d dolam AI1A RAH StA RASMI 1972)

D rfRHAD (MtnampNtdunIP malJumat TERHAD ~ruH Iclah dcmukon olch ofgaJllnllbadan dJ mana penHIJ~811 dJJ~anltl1l

o TlDAk lERIJAD

Disabkan oJeh

poundc C

rrANDATANOAN PENULlS)

AJama Tetap No 76 Kpg Nu p Nama Penyelta fN deg AHYAD KAMAL 94JOQ KOla Samarhan ABO AZl7 Sarawak

Tarikh ___ J1 1 Mei 2000 Tarikh II Me 20Q9 _ ___0

CATAT- rJllf u~ li~k het(t~nbullbull Itb Ktt11$ Prolel IIU S ltIT lltau TERtiAn 118 ~ lIuml Jariplda riha tCrIH~i5ilSl

beihgtr04m lknlol4ll tnctnnlIbu sdllih h1nf~h leI pccJG

This prOject report cnllllcd DE IGJIj 01 LOAD BEARIIG BRICKWORK

SY TEM was prepared b Awg Kamarudin Awg Japot as a partial fulfillment of

the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering with honours ( Civil) IS

hereby read and apprm e bv

Fn Ahmad Kamal Abd ALIZ Dale

( Supervisor)

bull

Special dedlcalionla my beloved alld lIruierslllndmg

aher lind MOlher

Thanh (or Cverylhmg amp may Allah WI hlesyrlll

II

CKNOWLEGMENT

The author wish to cpre~~ sincere appreciation and gralilude to the

supel Isors Mr Ahmad Kama I Abdul Azil and Puar Allda RaSld l for their

invaluab le guidance support encouragement and suggestions throughout the

complctlon nfthis thesIs and course of rudy

Lust but not least the author would like to say thank 10 lecturer tutor

administration staff fellow classmates fn ends for their kind assi~tance corporallon

and encouragement

111

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 2: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Pu I KhfdrttJc M ~

DESIG OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK YSTEMS

by

AWG KAMARUDIN AWG JAPOT

A thesis submitted to Faculty of Engineering Univcrsiti MalaysIa amwak

as a partial fulfillment of the reqUirements for the degree of Bachelor or Engineering (T Ions

(CIVtl Engmeenng) 2000

Bonmg Pnyhn Ts IIDiYnii 101) 5 Saraa

RI3a

BORA G PpoundNYERADAN lUIS

Judul DESIGI Of LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYS nMS

SESI PENGMIAN 199712000

Saya ______________~~~W~G4bK~A~~~1~A~R~J~1~)~ns~A~vv~G~IA~rQ~T_______________________ (RURlfF BESAR)

1 mcngnhU mtmbcnarlan liSJS Inl dlSlmpan dJ Pusal KhLdmat Maklumal UnlClSlll Miln~SHl Sanv--a~ dcngun I aratmiddotsy ra kegunan sepfU benllJl

I HkmiliJlt ertas proJek dalah di bah nama pcnullS mcl pcnUllSOl1 bGill projek bcrsllDlJl dan wb oteh IMA~o haklUlhbIa adaJnh kcpun3an UNIMAS

2 Noskah satman dt datam bltntuk kcrus au nukro hM)B bolell dJbuo dcn~Dn elgtltn benuli dlnpada pcIluhs

J Pus Khdm bullbull Mmlum Akademl UNtMAS dJbellarbn mmbWlt salman UDlU JgtC11gJDn mere 4 Ken prolek haD) boleb dllemtkan dellSn IcbenlUllll paIulis aaYMon TO)I adth meng kdAr ong

dt~uJw etak bull S~YI embatarknnludflt ruemben3Jlnn Pcrpusbkuan IllmlbuDt salman Icrta proJd 101 sebagai bnbun penuknran dJ aruara UlSU(U~1 pcngaJlon hnampgl bullbull SII lilndakan ( )

D SulIT 1tllgadunl~ maIJlJIDal ~ 1Itg berdat]l1h 1j~elamDlan Ilt4U Icpcnungan Mf~ cpen yang tcrmaruh d dolam AI1A RAH StA RASMI 1972)

D rfRHAD (MtnampNtdunIP malJumat TERHAD ~ruH Iclah dcmukon olch ofgaJllnllbadan dJ mana penHIJ~811 dJJ~anltl1l

o TlDAk lERIJAD

Disabkan oJeh

poundc C

rrANDATANOAN PENULlS)

AJama Tetap No 76 Kpg Nu p Nama Penyelta fN deg AHYAD KAMAL 94JOQ KOla Samarhan ABO AZl7 Sarawak

Tarikh ___ J1 1 Mei 2000 Tarikh II Me 20Q9 _ ___0

CATAT- rJllf u~ li~k het(t~nbullbull Itb Ktt11$ Prolel IIU S ltIT lltau TERtiAn 118 ~ lIuml Jariplda riha tCrIH~i5ilSl

beihgtr04m lknlol4ll tnctnnlIbu sdllih h1nf~h leI pccJG

This prOject report cnllllcd DE IGJIj 01 LOAD BEARIIG BRICKWORK

SY TEM was prepared b Awg Kamarudin Awg Japot as a partial fulfillment of

the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering with honours ( Civil) IS

hereby read and apprm e bv

Fn Ahmad Kamal Abd ALIZ Dale

( Supervisor)

bull

Special dedlcalionla my beloved alld lIruierslllndmg

aher lind MOlher

Thanh (or Cverylhmg amp may Allah WI hlesyrlll

II

CKNOWLEGMENT

The author wish to cpre~~ sincere appreciation and gralilude to the

supel Isors Mr Ahmad Kama I Abdul Azil and Puar Allda RaSld l for their

invaluab le guidance support encouragement and suggestions throughout the

complctlon nfthis thesIs and course of rudy

Lust but not least the author would like to say thank 10 lecturer tutor

administration staff fellow classmates fn ends for their kind assi~tance corporallon

and encouragement

111

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 3: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Bonmg Pnyhn Ts IIDiYnii 101) 5 Saraa

RI3a

BORA G PpoundNYERADAN lUIS

Judul DESIGI Of LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYS nMS

SESI PENGMIAN 199712000

Saya ______________~~~W~G4bK~A~~~1~A~R~J~1~)~ns~A~vv~G~IA~rQ~T_______________________ (RURlfF BESAR)

1 mcngnhU mtmbcnarlan liSJS Inl dlSlmpan dJ Pusal KhLdmat Maklumal UnlClSlll Miln~SHl Sanv--a~ dcngun I aratmiddotsy ra kegunan sepfU benllJl

I HkmiliJlt ertas proJek dalah di bah nama pcnullS mcl pcnUllSOl1 bGill projek bcrsllDlJl dan wb oteh IMA~o haklUlhbIa adaJnh kcpun3an UNIMAS

2 Noskah satman dt datam bltntuk kcrus au nukro hM)B bolell dJbuo dcn~Dn elgtltn benuli dlnpada pcIluhs

J Pus Khdm bullbull Mmlum Akademl UNtMAS dJbellarbn mmbWlt salman UDlU JgtC11gJDn mere 4 Ken prolek haD) boleb dllemtkan dellSn IcbenlUllll paIulis aaYMon TO)I adth meng kdAr ong

dt~uJw etak bull S~YI embatarknnludflt ruemben3Jlnn Pcrpusbkuan IllmlbuDt salman Icrta proJd 101 sebagai bnbun penuknran dJ aruara UlSU(U~1 pcngaJlon hnampgl bullbull SII lilndakan ( )

D SulIT 1tllgadunl~ maIJlJIDal ~ 1Itg berdat]l1h 1j~elamDlan Ilt4U Icpcnungan Mf~ cpen yang tcrmaruh d dolam AI1A RAH StA RASMI 1972)

D rfRHAD (MtnampNtdunIP malJumat TERHAD ~ruH Iclah dcmukon olch ofgaJllnllbadan dJ mana penHIJ~811 dJJ~anltl1l

o TlDAk lERIJAD

Disabkan oJeh

poundc C

rrANDATANOAN PENULlS)

AJama Tetap No 76 Kpg Nu p Nama Penyelta fN deg AHYAD KAMAL 94JOQ KOla Samarhan ABO AZl7 Sarawak

Tarikh ___ J1 1 Mei 2000 Tarikh II Me 20Q9 _ ___0

CATAT- rJllf u~ li~k het(t~nbullbull Itb Ktt11$ Prolel IIU S ltIT lltau TERtiAn 118 ~ lIuml Jariplda riha tCrIH~i5ilSl

beihgtr04m lknlol4ll tnctnnlIbu sdllih h1nf~h leI pccJG

This prOject report cnllllcd DE IGJIj 01 LOAD BEARIIG BRICKWORK

SY TEM was prepared b Awg Kamarudin Awg Japot as a partial fulfillment of

the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering with honours ( Civil) IS

hereby read and apprm e bv

Fn Ahmad Kamal Abd ALIZ Dale

( Supervisor)

bull

Special dedlcalionla my beloved alld lIruierslllndmg

aher lind MOlher

Thanh (or Cverylhmg amp may Allah WI hlesyrlll

II

CKNOWLEGMENT

The author wish to cpre~~ sincere appreciation and gralilude to the

supel Isors Mr Ahmad Kama I Abdul Azil and Puar Allda RaSld l for their

invaluab le guidance support encouragement and suggestions throughout the

complctlon nfthis thesIs and course of rudy

Lust but not least the author would like to say thank 10 lecturer tutor

administration staff fellow classmates fn ends for their kind assi~tance corporallon

and encouragement

111

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 4: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

This prOject report cnllllcd DE IGJIj 01 LOAD BEARIIG BRICKWORK

SY TEM was prepared b Awg Kamarudin Awg Japot as a partial fulfillment of

the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering with honours ( Civil) IS

hereby read and apprm e bv

Fn Ahmad Kamal Abd ALIZ Dale

( Supervisor)

bull

Special dedlcalionla my beloved alld lIruierslllndmg

aher lind MOlher

Thanh (or Cverylhmg amp may Allah WI hlesyrlll

II

CKNOWLEGMENT

The author wish to cpre~~ sincere appreciation and gralilude to the

supel Isors Mr Ahmad Kama I Abdul Azil and Puar Allda RaSld l for their

invaluab le guidance support encouragement and suggestions throughout the

complctlon nfthis thesIs and course of rudy

Lust but not least the author would like to say thank 10 lecturer tutor

administration staff fellow classmates fn ends for their kind assi~tance corporallon

and encouragement

111

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 5: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Special dedlcalionla my beloved alld lIruierslllndmg

aher lind MOlher

Thanh (or Cverylhmg amp may Allah WI hlesyrlll

II

CKNOWLEGMENT

The author wish to cpre~~ sincere appreciation and gralilude to the

supel Isors Mr Ahmad Kama I Abdul Azil and Puar Allda RaSld l for their

invaluab le guidance support encouragement and suggestions throughout the

complctlon nfthis thesIs and course of rudy

Lust but not least the author would like to say thank 10 lecturer tutor

administration staff fellow classmates fn ends for their kind assi~tance corporallon

and encouragement

111

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 6: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

CKNOWLEGMENT

The author wish to cpre~~ sincere appreciation and gralilude to the

supel Isors Mr Ahmad Kama I Abdul Azil and Puar Allda RaSld l for their

invaluab le guidance support encouragement and suggestions throughout the

complctlon nfthis thesIs and course of rudy

Lust but not least the author would like to say thank 10 lecturer tutor

administration staff fellow classmates fn ends for their kind assi~tance corporallon

and encouragement

111

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 7: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

ABS RACT

Many low-rise buildings have been constructed using structural steel or

reinforced concrete frames combIned wlth bnck in fill wan Although thIs foml of

eonstructlOn providlts strong durable walls with many desira ble propertIes such as

e~cel1ent fire resistance and sound transmIssion characteristics lise of load-beanng

brick has the potentia l to provide more cost-effective bui ldings Besiues that use of

load beanng wall also have more advantages such as faster construction trength

durabrlity and more fi re resIstance

Purpose of this research to study the desibTl of load bearing wall by using the

common clay bricks The deslgIl according to Brrtish Standard IBS) 5628 Part 1

Unrelnforced masonry

IV

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 8: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

ABSTRAK

Kebanyakkan rumah kos rendah setingkat banyak dibina menggunakkan

O

aedah StrutU1 bcsi atau rang -a stuktur -oohnt bcrtetuJallg oRelnforced concrete

yang dlgabungkan dcngan dtnding hata Walaupun kaedah pcmbinaan ini ada lah

kukuh dan kual sena dtndtng yang tahan dengan banyak cin-cln lain buk kepada

nntangan haba dan pemtndahan bunYI telapi kos pebi naannya ada lah terlalu Ii nggl

Penggunaan -aedah Load Bearing Wall mcmpunyal potellsi lmtuk mcgurangkan 0 0

kos pembtnaan sesuatu bangunano

Selam ltu penlJIlaan kaedah Load Bearing Wall mempunyai banyak

ke lebihan seperti tempoh pel1lbinann yang cepat kukuh tahan dan Sllllgat lahan

kepada rintangan haba berbanding kaedah Reinforced Concrete

Tujuan kajlan ini adalah untu melllpelaJari kaedah rekaan Load Beanng

Wall dengan menggunakan bata lanah lIal blasa berp1ndukan o Bnttsh Standard

5628 Pan 1 Use r unreinforced l1I~onry

v

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 9: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

TABLE OF CO TE T

( -mlltfJi

DEDICA TJO-i

ACK~OWLFJ)GEMENT

A BSTR-CT

ABSTRAK

TABLEOFCO TENTS

I IST OF APPElmrxs

L1ST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGI1RES

CHAPTER 1 IYfRODllCfIOll

11 General

I 2 Objectives

13 Metl1odolobY

Pag

11

III

V

v

V I

1(

Xl

3

3

V I

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 10: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVfEW

21 DIfference bcteen Rei nfortccd Concrete

Frames System and Load Bearing system 4

2 2 Masonry Buildmg Systems

221 lIlgle-gtlltJr I ouJ HtlIrlllg 8111ldmg yeflI

_l Masonry buildmg construct ion

231 l nreinjorceJ Masonry 10

232 IIIwcd 1Ji)IWI) 10

2-+ Bams and Lintels I I

F oundat ions 12

26 The factors etTecting the thickness of the walls 12

CHAPTER J DE IG1 PRl1CllLES

3 I Introduction 14

32 Matenals and specifications

3 21 Clay hrtds

322 AIrlol IS

33 DesiTl Concepts

33 1 80ic odesign 111111 Slute l)eligll 16

332 lL~lgtll oucls 17

333 l)( ~ If1I SrtJgth 19

VII

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 11: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

]A Consideration (If lendemess of walls

3 1 ~(IUJfrnt i rullt) _gt

3-12 Iaeral slppor 24

3-13 tJfeulve Irclghl or length 25

3middotU FOeclrlc IJlIcklle 26

315 Ectll1rtcily m loudmg 26

3 -16 [)eign verlicul re isallce waifs 26

35 Wall subjected to lalemlly Load

351 [ Immg dimenOn 17

352 De~ Igll mr)mlIIS m till panel1 28

CUAPTER4 DESIGN 31

cnAPTEn s TYPICAL LAYOUT BOll l ~ G PLANS FOR DETAn 50

CUAPTER 6 RFCOMMENDA TJONS AIfD CONCLlI ION 56

REfEREICES 5R

APPENDICES 59

vm

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 12: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Ll OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Original plan for single storey terrace hOLLie for RPR Batu Kawa

Km Jalan Batu Kawa kucblng

APPENDIX 2 Support condition for laterally loaded panels

APPENDIX 3 Table 9 Bending moment coefficient

IX

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 13: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

LIST OF TABLES

TuMe PUfe

TABLE 1 WORKS SIZE OF CLA Y BRICKS 15

TABLE 2 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR NORAL LOADS 19

TABLE 3 PARTIAL FACTOR OF SAFETY FOR MATERIAL

STRENGTH 20

fABLE-I CHARACTERISTIC COMPRESS]VE STRENGTH OF

STANDARD fORMAT J3RICK 2

TABLE S CHARACTERISTIC FLEXURAL STRENGTH 22

x

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 14: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

LIST OF FIG RES

FIgures Page

11 House constructed use load beanng systems

21 A comparison of the load transfer between RC frame system and 6

the load bearing walls by the top view

22 Typical load bearing wall and reinforced concrete building 7

element~ by the SIde VICW

2 3 Slructural action of a slogle storey structure 9

3 1 Effective height for typical sections 25

xi

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 15: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Chapter 1

INTROD eTlON

FIgure 11 House constructed use load bearing system

1 I GE ERAL

Load-beanng wall system is one of the type of construction of the strUctures

rhis method is the Idest Conn of construction The old bridges th pyramids are just

same of the examples Almost all the pre war buildmg m Mala)sia uses this method like

the Sultan Ahmad Samad building Wi th the Introduction of concrete and ste l burs 10

Malaysia the reinforced concrete frame system wi th brick inl111 walls become more

Chapler I

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 16: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

popular Is time goes by many of the Englneers became very used to designing RC

frames and lend to eltller forget or feel less confident about load heanng wall

conslrucllon However IOtemallonally load beanng walls conslJUctions arc dely used

In U A- Canada France Gemlany and Ne Zealand and durablt uou I loda~

In Malaysia there has always been a need to construct houses cheaper and fasler

10 meel Ihe growing demand fo r them In the mstances blllldlOg matenals especially steel

and concrete are becoming ore expensive and quite often Ihere IS shonagc of these

materia l ~ In the elTon to overcome this national problem Load Dearing Brickork

construction method are used to change the RC frames system especially for single

storey low-cost housmg Load bearing brickwork system wl1lch has proven 10 be not

only cost and lime elTeclc but also easi ly Implemented and wel l supJXHled hy our

bwlding industrys infraslJUcture Figure 11 shown the example the house constructed

use of load heari ng wall system

hapter I 2

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 17: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

bull

I2 OBJECTIVES

The alms orl hl~ lhe~ls

a) to reintroduce an old building construction method called Load Rearing Brickwork

as a more SUitable alternallve to the conyentiollal melhod

oJ to study how to design single sto rey load bearing building according to BS 5628

Code of practice for use Qf masonry Pan I l1nremrorced maonry

1 3 METHODOLOGY

A case study was redesign a single store~ terrace house for Raneangan Perwnahan

Rafyat (RPR) Batu Kawa Kin lalan Batu Kawa Kuehing Dcgtign arc u~c Qf load

bearing briekworl- method according to BS 5628 Pan I The architectural drawings get

from Jabatan SuruhaTlJaya Ptrurnahan dan Pembangunan Sarawak (SPPS) Besides that

the study also involves a rtseareh about the single load bearing bUilding

Chaple I 3

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 18: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Chapter 2

LlTER CT JR REVIEW

21 Difference between Reinforced Concrete Frame System and Load-

bearing ~stem

Reinforced concrete frame syshm and load-bearing system is two-difTerence

method of construcllOn The method of design for reinforced conerte structun are

genera lly according t BS 8110 (Stn(l1Ira1IIe (If CIIltnll ur 12 and 3) The

method of onstructlon where the load transfer from the roof to the OCam Then the

load from the beam will support by the colLUnn to the fowldation The bridwork in

RC frame structures mere ly acts as nonstructural partitions

Chapter ~ 4

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 19: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

MeanwhIle the load-bearing system ~hcre the brick walis are used to support

all structural loads Imposed by the roof uppr wall and noor slaps and lateral load

such as wind and SO) I pressure The method of desIgn for load-bearmg sy tem is

gnerally according to BS 5628 Part I and 2

In th I oad Beanng system the masonry-walls are designed taking into

account the strength and t~ pc of maso nry to be used hlC h em be concrete block or

clay hrick The factor safety adopted m the design has to exceed the mInImum factor

of safety stipulated in the BritI sh Standard 5628

Raft foundation IS usually used to support the loads from the walls and in

some ase whre Ihe sOils lIl1raonlble pileS Illay stIl i be rqUlred That is differ to

the RC frames systems where Ihe pad footing (squire iJIIlIlg ) are usually used to

support overall bui lding (lIIcudinrlliill) Figure 21 and 22 sh o~s the differentiate

between the RC frame systems and load beanng systems

Chaplel 5

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 20: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

RC beam RC column

beanng wall b) the top veiw

Chapter ~ 6

bull ~

(a) RC frame systems - load from slab I roof 10 beam 10 column 10 foundation

Wal ls

(b) Load beanng walb - load from slab I roof to wall to fo undation

Figure _1 A compan son of load transfer between RC frame system and the load

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 21: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

-- - - -------- - ---------- - ----

Roof beam l lpper blOck Wall reinforced concrete

Floor upper column reinfnfced concrete Floor

Lower hrock wall lower column uppe Aoor beam

Reinforced mneree tloor AClint as Raft foundation

Reinforced concrele noor

Ground heam

Pact fOOling SIIITnc beam

a) Load Bearing wall (b) conventional reinforced concrete

Figure 22 Typica l load beanng wall and rtinforccd concrete hui ldmg elements hy side view

Chapter 2 7

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 22: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

----

22 Masonry Building Systems

22 1 Smgle-stort) Load Rltan ng Buildtng s)~[ems

lOgIe-storey buildings make up the majority of load heanng masonry

construcllon Typical example art) warehou es mdustnal buddJngs bank and

commercial stores Singles fam ily detached hOUSing also emplllYS Single-storey load

beanng walls In these applications load bearing masonry walls the exterior ene lope

walls Figure 23 shows the main features of a one-story masonry building

Thin alls are used for economic reasons and SlnCC unrelnforced free-standing

thin walls have negligible sabili~ they must be laterallv support in some way

Stability is achieved b using end walls intemlediate cross alh support along the

top edge ufthe 311 or 3 combmation of these A lateral support along the top edge of

the all is usuallv prOlded b the roof or ceil ing system

Wind pressure acting on the exterior walls arc transfrred hy them to support

proVided by th~ 1oor roof end walls and cross walls The portion load of load

tranterred to the rooflevel is in tum transferred by the roof or clliJng system actmg

a stilT diaphragm in i ~ 011 plane to cros~ walls and end walls The comf1onenl~ of

load distnbuted to the end walls and cross wall are then tran~millcd through these

walls by sheanng aCllon to the foundation

Chapter 2 8

- -----~--- -shy

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 23: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

Wall A ( Figure 23 ) is likely to be a CrItical clement In resisting wind

pre sure because It IS only supponcd along Ihe top and boltom With Itghtwelghl rOI[

construction and reduced weight of thin alls out-of-plant venlcal bending in tall

walls may produce ten~ i l e tres~e that require the all to be reinforced Axial

comprtsslve loads and horizontal shear are usually small in single-story build ings and

can eaSily be r~ i led e~n lhough thin wall s are lL~ed

Figure 23 Structural action of a single storey structure

Chapter 2 9

- --- - ---shy--- --~

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~

Page 24: DE I G OF LOAD BEARING BRICKWORK SYSTEMS

-

23 Types of masonry construction

Each of the ma onn building ystem~ described until recent lime been

constructed of unreinforced masonry As wall thickness have been reduced and

distances between support increased reinforced and prestressed masonry have been

introduced

1 1 Unreinforced Ma~onry

UrWlnfoned masonry IS the good method can be used in low and medium-rise

bulidlns In areas of 10 se ismic activity P lain ma onry e lementmiddot (()m ref( hlrlltk IIr

clav hrick) are the s imple t to construct as they contain no reinforcement other than

possib le inclusion of light joi nt reinfo rcemelll to control lthnnkagc crack ing

Therefore they rely on thc strength or the masonry alone to resist load Because

ma onry IS strong In compression but weak In tensIOn unrcalnrorced masonry has

Teat resistance tll load cousing tenSile stresscs Therefor ten de stresses in

unnmforccd mason) must be designed to alue be low the tenSile ~trenglh or the

section i~ assumed to crack

l 1 _ J _ Reinforced Masonry

Reinforcement is mainly incorporated in masonry to resist tensile and shear

stresses and to prOvide adequate ductility Initially bending s t res~es due to the lateral

load are less than the ~tTesses due to axial compressIon Tensile stresses develop in

the masonry with increased latera l load and as laternl load 1Jlcrcac fu nher the 10

- --- ---- ---- - ----- - -~