department of education education infrastructure programme of action portfolio committee...
DESCRIPTION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Schools Infrastructure Review Pressure nodes Expansion of Grade R Degradation of school infrastructure assets 2001 – 2003 campaign to eradicate all instances of learners under trees 2004 extension of the provisioning to learners in mud schools, unsafe conditions, water and sanitation Serious non delivery in identified and priority areas in some provincesTRANSCRIPT
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTUREPROGRAMME OF ACTION
Portfolio Committee Presentation Cape Town
15 February 2005
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Schools Infrastructure Review Reduced classroom needs from 57 499 in 1996
to 31254 in 2004 Open the doors of learning , by increasing
access, and ensuring equity through lower learner to educator ratios.
Pressure nodes Equity between provinces Rural province infrastructure “ cost disability”
scenario Migration of learners within and between
provinces.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Schools Infrastructure Review Pressure nodes Expansion of Grade R Degradation of school infrastructure assets 2001 – 2003 campaign to eradicate all instances
of learners under trees 2004 extension of the provisioning to learners in
mud schools, unsafe conditions, water and sanitation
Serious non delivery in identified and priority areas in some provinces
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONFigure : Provincial infrastructure budget allocations * R 000 000.
459 501
1162
3200
1791
2099
481
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Figure : National Overview Classroom Needed
16781
522357863455
31245
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Total needsFeb 05
Planned 04 Planned 05 Planned 06 Backlog
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Classrooms needed and to be built in the MTEF 2004-2007
Total classrooms Needed
2004 Plan
2005 Plan
2006 Plan
Backlog
EC 8953 864 862 1000 6227FS 237 33 25 26 153GP 454 196 66 47 145
KZN 7180 1000 2000 2000 2180LP 8150 940 5500 1133 577MP 3053 477 437 422 1717NC 492 63 87 90 252NW 750 75 110 125 440WC 1976 354 649 200 773
Total 31 245
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Figure : National Overview Basic Services – Water Provision
4771
1023 822 920
2006
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Total schoolswithout w ater
Feb 05
Planned 04/05 Planned 05/06 Planned 06/07 Backlog
Total 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 BacklogTotal 4771 1023 822 920 2006
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Number of schools to be provided with water in 2004-2007 and number remaining
Total 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 BacklogEC 1279 244 100 200 735FS 534 93 118 119 204 not viable
= 0GP 0 0 0 0 0KZN 766 98 250 250 168LP 1477 530 180 200 567MP 520 50 114 91 256NC 0 0 0 0 0NW 195 28 60 60 49WC 0 0 0 0 0Total 4771
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Figure : National Overview Basic Services – Sanitation Provision
979 1005 1164 1078
4226
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Total SchoolsWithout
Sanitation
Planned 2004 Planned 2005 Planned 2006 Backlog
Total 2004 2005 2006 Backlog
Total 4226 979 1005 1164 1078
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONNumber of schools to be provided with sanitation in 2004 and number remaining
Total 2004 2005 2006 BacklogEC 849 244 100 200 305FS 294 130 61 60 43
GP 0 0 0 0 0KZN 1300 120 300 300 580LP 995 225 300 350 120MP 486 178 154 154 0NC 7 7 0 0 0NW 295 75 90 100 30WC 0 0 0 0 0Total 4226 1078
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Maintenance Programme The Department has noted and is concerned with the
absence of the various maintenance programmmes. These programmmes can be categorized into 3 areas:
– Day to day maintenance– Scheduled preventative maintenance– Emergency maintenance
An effective maintenance plan will enhance the asset at the same time it will contribute to effective utilization of infrastructure funding.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONFigure 8: School infrastructure conditionality assessment
1716 1020
9287
3043
1083713232
3177
8095
12002373
02000400060008000
100001200014000
Excellent96
Excellent04
Good 96 Good 04 MinorRep 96
MinorRep 04
Weak 96 Weak 04 Bad 96 Bad 04
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Provincial Education Departments– Planning– Prioritization– Budget estimates– Project manage delivery agents
Provincial Government other Departments– Integration of infrastructure programme
Department of Education– Monitoring and evaluation of infrastructure
delivery
Service delivery responsibilities
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Service Delivery Agents– Provincial public works, and other external private
agencies.– Contract management of the project.
Contractor– Responsible to delivery of the project within time ,
quality and budget.
Service delivery responsibilities
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Provincial Education Departments– Capacity – Human and skills– Systems -
• Factual data• ADHOC Management of information
– Monitoring of delivery agents– Planning– Contracting – No Service level agreements– Location of school for effective utilization– Provincial leadership
Challenges faced by infrastructure delivery
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Provincial Education Departments– Absence of maintenance programme– Inefficient financial resource allocation
Public Works– Capacity– Delivery accountable– Value for money– Procurement modalities
Challenges faced by infrastructure
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Inter departmental integration– Department of Water Affairs – Department of Mineral and Energy– Department of Housing– Department of Local Government– Local Government
Department of Education– Capacity human and skills– Fiscal federalism– Concurrent functions – Norms and standards development
Challenges faced by infrastructure
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Department of Education to set up monitoring and evaluation unit
Capacitation of National and Provincial Departments
Revise procurement process Members of parliament to assist with
monitoring and evaluation of infrastructure development
Provincial MPL to assist with monitoring and evaluation of infrastructure development
Turn around strategy
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Infrastructure process map Process / Description Government Private secIndicative budget allocation Treasury -Needs identification 3 months -Priority list to instruction to action 1 month -Documentation Phase 8 months 1 MonthTender Period 1 month 2- 4 weeksAdjudication 2 months 4 weeksRecommendation of contractor 1 day 1 dayApproval for appointment 3 months 1 weekContract finalization 1 month 2 weeksContract Document Specific Industry NormProfessional quality Bad - fair Good -
Excellent
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Infrastructure process map Process / Des Government Private sec
Completion deadlines 80% over ran Time / Penalties
Quality assurance professional Poor - BEE Good – re do
Professional empowerment role
Time cost minimal
Final completion / Retention 6 – 24 months 3 months
Post completion guarantees ? Contractor close Latent / Pattern
Maintenance plan Nil - limited Ext from comp.
Added costing for time “delay” 15 % - 30 % Nil
Building life span 3 months – 5 years
20 year cycle
Maintenance allocation 10 % immediate 100% over the period cycle
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Strengthen fiscal and governance mechanism in the system
Develop and strengthen systems for monitoring and evaluation
Norms and standards for infrastructure development
Conduct a full infrastructure technical audit per school
Joint meeting with service delivery agents
Turn around stratergy
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Investigate alternative construction methods, building materials and financial packages:– Turn key roll out– Private Public Partnership– Lease buy back– Cluster management contract– Minor works roster system
Department to establish a data base per school that will be updated and monitored
Quarterly reports to be forwarded to Minister, Portfolio committee , Cabinet and President
Skill Provincial Education Departments officials on asset review and community based practices
Turn around strategy
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Monitor to ensure value for money outputs Cluster projects to ensure economy of scale EPWP , active participation by communities in
developing schools, to the required standards and specification
School efficiencies:– Rationalization of schools– Transport strategy– On site accommodation- hostels
School effective planning Sustainable housing development to include schools
development.
Turn around strategy
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Indicative budget allocation per province Needs identification by Physical planners Needs priority list complied Priority list developed into National treasury business
plans Priority list forward to implementing agent for
implementation Education department, monitors, evaluates and reports
to National Department.
Infrastructure delivery process map
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Thank you