deviance and violence in sport
TRANSCRIPT
“If you can meet with triumph and disasters and treat the two imposters just the same”. Rudyard Kipling – Wimbledon statue
Batting on a sticky wicket
Being on the ropes
The final hurdle
Our culture puts sport on a pedestal and our sporting heroes
are influential role models.
Millions watch sport on the TV – Olympics, World Cup,
Premiership matches, F1
But sometimes are sporting heroes let us down….
Section C – Part 3
Deviance1. Understand the main types of deviance in sport2. Describe the causes of hooliganism and the methods
used to combat it3. Explain the impact of hooliganism and player violence
has on those involved, on sport and on wider society4. Describe violence between players and how it is dealt
with5. Evaluate the relationship between sport and the law
and the effect on performers, officials and spectators
This part of specification also covers drugs in sport and you will need to:
1. Understand why performers take performance enhancing drugs and the arguments for and against their use
2. Explain how the authorities are trying to eliminate drug taking in sport and the associated difficulties
But we’ve already covered this when we looked at drug doping
in Section A!
Deviance could be:
Voluntary e.g. performer
decide
Co-operative e.g. the performer decides to take
drugs because all his friends are doing so
Enforced e.g. a former East German swimmer took drugs because her coach gave them to her
Deviance: behaviour that
falls outside the norms or outside
what is deemed to be acceptable
Also behaviour of spectators,
managers, coaches and officials
Behaviour of players
Breaking the laws of sport
v breaking the laws
of society
Sport can be seen as a subsection of social behaviour
Types of devianceSports sociologist Jay Coakley (1992) considered 3 types of behaviour:
Positive deviance:Behaviour that is
outside the norm but with no intention to
harm or break rules – overconforming to what is expected
Normal
Negative deviance:Behaviour that goes
against the norm and has a detrimental
effect on individuals and on society in
general – underconforming to
what is expected
Normal distribution for this behaviour
Positive deviance:Behaviour that is
outside the norm but with no intention to
harm or break rules – overconforming to what is expected
E.g. oAn individual who trains or plays so hard they injure themselves oBehaviour that can lead to a disruption of normal lifeoPlay when they are injured
Deviance but their actions are for positive reasons:
They are striving to win or to improve within the ethical guidelines of the activity
Although deviant can be seen in a positive light
Could argue that a player who is striving to win within the rules and etiquette of the sport and who accidently and without intent injures another player is also exhibiting
positive deviance
Negative deviance:Behaviour that goes
against the norm and has a detrimental
effect on individuals and on society in
general – underconforming to
what is expected
Behaves in a way that knowingly and intentionally breaks the rules and ethics of sport
e.g.Using performance enhancing drugsCheating within a contest – deliberately fouling another playerBeing bribed to influence the outcome of a match Fan violence or hooliganismIllegal betting on the outcome of a contestFinancial irregularities in the transferring of playersPlayer violence
Relative deviance:Deviant behaviour that is not acceptable in wider
society but may be deemed to acceptable by those
involved in a sub-culture
Some behaviour acceptable in sport
but not in wider society? e.g. use of fists in
rugby (hidden in scrum or
otherwise
Players deem this acceptable as
long as violence doesn’t breach an
unwritten limit
BUT gouging & biting
completely off limits
Sport often likes to deal with
things in house
But police less and less willing to turn a blind eye
Deviance and the
contract to compete
Whether or not the behaviour is viewed within a sporting context is determined by whether or not it breaks the contract to compete.
Don’t strive to win or try to loose –
negative deviance
Not trying to win fairly – cheating or
unacceptable physical contact e.g.
biting – negative deviance
Expected to allow opponent fair and
free change to win – taking drugs or
bribing an official does not allow this –
negative deviance
Using tactics, strategies and skills that you use to stop an opponent within the expectations of
the activity – Relative deviance
Concept of relative deviance and the contract to compete are closely linked
Concept increasingly challenge but the
media and society in general
Both imply that somehow sport exists within its
own moral subculture
Rewards of winning so great that a large
number of individuals may be prepared to
cross the line. (May be particularly true of positive deviance)
Causes of deviant
behaviour
Individual lacks moral restraint to keep to code of
conduct
Individuals may value winning above the loss of respect or
punishment that may occur
Deviant behaviour may be becoming less socially
unacceptable and cause less negative comment than in
the past
NGBs may feel less able to punish due to power of commercial interests or fear
of being taken to court by performer who they punish
Violence in sport
Violence between players
Violence among
spectators
Two ways this generally occurs:
A spontaneous outburst
A premeditated and planned action
Cause of violence between players:
Most violence occurs as an aggressive act – refer to sport psychology notes
In summary, aggressive behaviour may be caused by:
•Innate•Frustration•Loss of identity (follow the actions of the crowd)•Social learning – imitating others
Within some teams they have a well-known characters (enforcers), whose role it is to physically intimidate the opposition or to act in retaliation on behalf of others
Drugs, gamesmanship taken too far,
hyping-up, presence of spectators, unacceptable
aggression, acts against the law
Dealing with violence between players
Responsibility of individual performers, team managers or
coaches and the NGBs
An NGB may take a range of actions:
•Ensuring that match officials and their decisions are supported when dealing with violent behaviour of players•Punishing players post match•Being prepared to use post-match video evidence•Upholding players with a good disciplinary record as role models•Using ‘fair play’ awards to reward clubs with good disciplinary records•Training officials in player management and how to defuse situations between players
NGBs keen to diminish violence – so sport’s
reputation is not damaged
NGBs like to deal with violence themselves but more involvement from
legal system evident
Important that leaders, managers,, coaches, captains set a good example and set the tone for their teams as they have a
great responsibility for player conduct.
To ensure good player behaviour they could:
Set a good example themselves before and during contests
Establish a clear code of conduct and expectations
Criticise or punish players who fail to meet the code of conduct; play substitutes in their place
Praise or promote those players who set a good example
Where possible, ensure that players who have a low flash point are kept away from high stress situations
Stress appropriate behaviour in team talks
Understand each individual player’s level of arousal and try to avoid overarousal
Train players to manage their own level of arousal
Avoid an attitude of winning at all costs.
Hooliganism
Hooliganism: anti-social or aggressive/violent behaviour by people in a group of spectators
Suggested causes:• Fans drink too much alcohol• Local derby/high tension
between rival fans• Pre-match media hype• Poor officiating• Diminished responsibility
within a large crowd/depersonalisation
• The team being supported is losing
• Poor crowd control/poor policing – crowd confinement
• Religion
Solutions:• Control alcohol sales• All seater stadiums• Improve policing (numbers
increase)/segregation of fans• Stewards• Increase family concept• CCTV• Penalties/bans• More responsible media
reporting• Kick racism out of football
campaign