docs 7383
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
1/14
GGrreeeennBBuuiillddiinngg&&HHuummaannEExxppeerriieenncceeTTeessttiinnggGGrreeeennBBuuiillddiinnggSSttrraatteeggiieesswwiitthhVVoolluunntteeeerreeddGGeeooggrraapphhiiccIInnffoorrmmaattiioonn
ChrisPyke1,SeanMcMahon,TomDietsche
U.S.GreenBuildingCouncil
ResearchProgramWhitePaper
June10,
2010
1Correspondingauthor:Dr.ChrisPyke,Director,Research,2101LSt,NW,Suite500,Washington,DC20037.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
2/14
1
UUSSGGBBCCRReesseeaarrcchhPPrrooggrraammTheUSGBCResearchProgramadvancesgreenbuildingpracticethroughappliedresearchandinnovation. It
servicesasabridgebetweenprimaryindustry,academic,andgovernmentandgreenbuildingpractitioners.
RReesseeaarrcchhPPrrooggrraammWWhhiitteePPaappeerrTheResearchProgramperiodicallyproduceswhitepapersaddressingtopicsofinteresttostaff. These
documentsreflectonlytheideasandobservationsoftheauthors. Theydonotnecessarilyreflectpoliciesor
prioritiesof
the
USGBC.
They
are
intended
to
promote
intellectual
discussion
of
specific
issues.
Readers
are
encouragedtocontactthecorrespondingauthorwithquestionsorcomments.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
3/14
2
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonnBuiltenvironmentsoftendefinethefabricofourcommunitiesandplayacentralroleinphysicaland
psychologicalhealth. Today,themajorityofempiricaldatacollectioninbuiltenvironmentsfocusesonphysical
attributesandenvironmentalperformance,suchasenergyorwaterconsumption. Wearebuildingincreasingly
sophisticatedsystemstocollect,analyze,anduseinformationonbuildingenergyconsumption;information
networksthat
soon
will
stretch
from
the
power
plant
to
aSmart
Meter
and,
in
some
cases,
to
aSmart
Phone.
Thiscreatesunprecedentedopportunitiestomanageenergyuseandimproveenergyefficiency. Whilethe
volumeofinformationaboutenergyand,toalesserdegreewater,isgrowingrapidly,informationaboutthe
experienceofpeopleinandaroundbuiltenvironmentslagsfarbehind.
Therelevantdimensionsofhumanexperienceencompasstraditionalnotionsofoccupantproductivity,comfort,
andsatisfaction,aswellasrelatedconceptsofwalkability,wellbeing,connectivity,community,andsocial
capital(Dearry2004). Inanattempttobetterunderstandtheseconcepts,anddevelopaframeworkforthe
sustainedcollectionofdataonactualhumanexperiencewithinthebuiltenvironmentthispaperexploresthe
intersectionbetweenthreeimportantconcepts:
Humanexperience; VolunteeredGeographicInformation(VGI);and Greenbuilding.
Ourgoalistoexploreopportunitiestoteststrategieswithpracticebasedexperiments. Webelievethatthisis
partofalargerefforttoadvancethegreenbuildingcommunitytowardevidencebasedpracticebasedon
practicebasedevidence(Simonsetal.2003).
HHuummaannEExxppeerriieenncceeOurbasisforunderstandingtheseaspectsofhumanexperiencelargelyremainstiedtotraditionalsurvey
methods. Weusepaperorwebpageformstoaskpeoplewhattheythinkandhowtheyfeel. Withskilland
properexperimentdesign,thisapproachyieldsimportantinsights. However,thisapproachrequiressubstantial
investmentineachnewdatapoint,anditoffersfewopportunitiestocreatethekindofpervasive,readily
scalabletypesofdatawewillsoonusetounderstandphenomenasuchasenergyandwateruse. Forexample,
industryandacademicresearchershavebeguntoenvisionanenergyecosystemdrivenbypervasive
informationaboutenergysupplyanddemand(ArnoldandCochrane2009). Majortechnologycompaniesare
rushingtoprovideresidentialandcommercialconsumerswithnewtypesofinformationsystems,manyofwhich
providethefoundationofacominggenerationofenergysavingsapplicationsandproducts(e.g.,Microsoft
Hohm,
Google
PowerMeter,
and
Apples
Smart
Home
Energy
Management
System).
A
similar
vision
has
yet
to
emergeforunderstandingtheexperienceofhumansinandaroundbuiltenvironments.
Asymmetriesbetweenourunderstandingofhumanexperienceandissuessuchasenergyarenottheresultof
chanceorintrinsicvalue. Theyreflectlongstandingpatternsofattentionandinvestmentinresearchand
development. Areviewoffederalresearchanddevelopmentfundingrelatedtogreenbuildingfortheperiod
20022005foundthatenergyrelatedresearchreceived72%ofavailablefunding,whileindoorenvironmental
qualityrelatedresearchreceivedonly2%offunding(Baum2007). Thisallocationofresourcesbeliestheactual
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
4/14
3
driversofoperationalcostsandbusinessvalueassociatedwithbuildings. Studiesrepeatedlyfindthathuman
resourcescomprisethemajorityoftotalexpensesassociatedwithofficebuildings. Forexample,Romm(1994)
foundthatpersonnelconstitute92%ofoperatingexpenses,whileCalifornasDepartmentofGeneralServices
(2002)estimated89%. Aslowlygrowingbodyofcasestudiesoverthepast20yearsillustratesthepotential
benefitstoourhumanresources(individualandsocietal,financialandotherwise)frombetterbuildingsand
communities(e.g.Kaplan1989,Browning1994,Milton2000,Fisk2000,Kats2003,Kats2010,CarnegieMellon
University).Even
modest
improvements
in
productivity,
absenteeism,
and/or
employee
retention
can
substantiallyoutweighthetraditionallysoughtafterefficiencybenefitssuchasenergysavings. Theseare
mirroredbysignificantpotentialhealthandwellnessbenefits,suchasreductionsinexposuretotoxic
substancesandimprovementsinphysicalactivitylevels.
Thesepersistenttrendscontributetoasituationwhereinformationonenergyandenvironmentalperformance
dwarfrelevantinformationaboutfactorsrelatedtooccupantexperienceandhealthoutcomes. Thisimbalance
undermineseffortstoestablishevidencebasedfeedbackstoimprovegreenbuildingguidelinesand,ultimately,
advancegreenbuildingpractice. Recognizingthisimbalancedoesnotquestionthecriticalimportanceof
energyandwater;however,itdoescallforaconsciousefforttoestablishamorebalancedfoundationof
informationonbuildingperformancethatreflectsbothpeopleandtheenvironment.
Thebottomlineonhumanexperienceisthatwearesystematicallyunderinvestinginthemostvaluableaspect
ofbuildings,occupantexperience. Asaresult,weknowlessthanweshouldabouthumanexperienceinand
aroundbuiltenvironments. Inturn,wehavelessevidencetodemonstratethatgreenbuildingpractices
enhancehumanexperience. Thisfeedsacyclewhereweunderinvestinhighperformanceprojects,because
welackdataontheperformanceofhighperformanceprojects(Nelson2010).
ImportanceofHumanExperienceHuman
experience
is
one
of
the
most
critical
barometers
of
the
success
of
a
built
environment.
Traditionally,
humanexperienceinandaroundbuiltenvironmentshasbeenevaluatedthroughsurveys,interviews,and,in
somecases,directobservations. Thesetriedandtruemethodsyieldimportantinsights,buttheyarenotreadily
scalableorspatiallyextensible. Everyobservationrequiressubstantialinvestmentsintimeandenergyandis
difficulttogeneralizeanditerate. Weneednew,scalablesourcesofinformationandsystematicfeedback
processestohelpadvanceconsiderationforoccupantexperienceasapartofevidencebasedgreenbuilding
practice.
VVoolluunntteeeerreeddGGeeooggrraapphhiiccIInnffoorrmmaattiioonnVolunteeredGeographicInformation(VGI)isatermpopularizedinthegeographicinformationscience
community2
.It
encompasses
concepts,
methods,
and
technologies
that
allow
individuals
to
collect
and
convey
dataaboutspatiallyandtemporallydistributedphenomena. Ithasbeenenabledbyongoingadvancesinboth
mobilecomputinghardware,suchassensorsandhandhelddevices,andsoftware,suchcommunications
protocols,middleware,andadvancedservertechnology. Itisnowpossibletouseofftheshelftechnologyto
createmobiledevicesthattracklocation,measurephysicalactivity,monitorphysiologicalconditions(e.g.,heart
rate),andallowforsynchronousandasynchronouscommunication.
2http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
5/14
4
SuccessfulexamplesofVGIincludecitizenscienceprogramssuchasthelongrunningChristmasBirdCount3or
theschoolbased,environmentalscienceprogramProjectGLOBE4. Inbothexamples,volunteersfollowexplicit
protocolstomakerepeatedmeasuresofenvironmentalorecologicalconditions. Thesespatiallyandtemporally
specificdataarecombinedincentralrepositoriesandusedforawidevarietyofscientificresearch. Both
programshaveyieldedsignificantscientificfindings. Advancesinsensors,informationtechnology,andsocial
networkinghave
led
some
to
suggest
that
we
are
ready
for
abreakthrough
in
the
scale
and
impact
of
such
efforts(Goodchild2007).
VGIisparticularlycompellingforthebuildingsectorwherelongrunningdebatesaboutdataconfidentialityhave
stifledprogresstowardscreatinglarge,accessibledatasets. Aswehavediscussedintheprecedingsection,this
contributestoapervasivelackofinformation,particularlyabouthumanexperience. VGIillustratesitispossible
tomakesignificantscientificprogressbyfocusingonactionsthatwillingindividualscantaketocontributedata
thataddressesimportantscientificquestions. Themostsuccessfulapplicationsbringtogetheraccessibleand
robusttechnology,effectiveformsofinterpersonalengagementandreward,andthoughtfulexperimentdesign.
VGIoffersthepotentialto,atleasttemporarily,putasidelongrunningargumentsaboutdatadisclosure
mandates(McNeillandWilkie1979)andmakesignificantprogressthroughsystematicallyorganizednetworks
ofselfmotivateddataproviders. Inconcept,asimilarprincipleunderliesUSGBCsongoingBuilding
PerformancePartnership5. IntheBPPprogram,projectteamsvolunteertoprovideinformationonenergyand
waterperformanceforLEEDcertifiedfacilities. Thisfurtherdemonstratestheirleadershipandcommitmentto
greenbuilding,whilecontributingasmallpieceofdatathatadvancesthevisionofeffectivemarket
transformation. AswithmostVGIbasedefforts,theBPPprogramcombinesaccessibleinformationtechnology
(USEPAsPortfolioManager),socialnetworkingandpeerrecognition,withasystematicstrategytocollect
relevantdataacrossatargetpopulation. Thereisanuntappedopportunitytocomplementthisworkwitha
focusonhumanexperience,includingoutcomeslinkedtohealth,comfort,andsatisfaction.
ImportanceofVolunteeredGeographicInformationInthepast,geographicinformationwasscarceandexpensive. Itrequiredinvestmentsbygovernmentsand
otherlargeinstitutionstocollect,compile,anddistributeinformationsuchasmapsand,later,imagery. Over
thepastdecade,wehavewitnessedtheemergenceofnewtechnologiesthatempowerindividualsacting
togethertoreadilycreatevaluableinformationabouttheworld. Thisrepresentsadramaticshiftinhow
informationisproducedand,ultimately,howitinformspractice.
GGrreeeennBBuuiillddiinnggGreen
building
is
asystematic
effort
to
create,
sustain,
and
accelerate
changes
in
practice,
technology,
and
behaviortoreducebuildingrelatedenvironmentalimpactswhilecreatingplacesthatarehealthierandmore
satisfyingforpeople. IntheUnitedStates,greenbuildinghaslargelyemergedfromcommunitiesof
practitionersworkingtodefinebeneficialprocessesandpracticesandcreatemechanismstorecognizeand
3http://www.audubon.org/bird/cbc/
4www.globe.gov
5http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=2201
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
6/14
5
encouragetheiruse. Today,theU.S.GreenBuildingCouncilrealizesthisvisionwithacombinationofprocesses
andtools,includingconsensusbasedratingsystems,rigorousthirdpartyreviewandcertification,and
educationalresources. OneofthemostimportanttoolsistheLeadershipinEnergyandEnvironmentalDesign
(LEED)greenbuildingcertificationprogram. LEEDratingsystemsincludeacombinationofrequiredprerequisitesandelectivecredits. Herewerefertotheseelementscollectivelyasgreenbuildingstrategies.
Eachstrategyhasaclearlydefinedintentthatdescribesthedesiredoutcome. Eachintentiscraftedbyteamsof
volunteersand
subjected
to
multiple
rounds
of
public
review
and
comment.
Each
credit
provides
one
or
more
optionsforspecificstrategiesthatcanachieveitsintent,andeachoptionisassociatedwithspecificrequired
documentation. Duringthecertificationprocess,documentationisprovidedtoanindependentreviewbody
whichultimatelydetermineswhethereachstrategymeetsLEEDrequirements.
RequirementsforLEEDcertificationarenotstatic. Rather,theyreflectanexplicitcommitmenttoraisingthe
bartowardanultimategoalofregenerativebuiltenvironmentsbuildingsandcommunitiesthatactually
improveconditionsforpeopleandtheenvironment. Changeisoftenmanifestedinthedetailsoftherating
systemwithnewdocumentationrequirementsorsocalledalternativecompliancepaths. Creditintents
representthemoststableaspectofthesystem;theyreflectahighlevelaspirationthat,inpractice,maybe
fulfilledinmanydifferentways.
Currentgreenbuildingprocessesandpracticeshavebeensuccessfulinpromotingtheuseofspecificstrategies
duringplanning,design,construction,andoperationofneighborhoods,newconstruction,andexistingbuildings.
Thissuccessisreflectedinover130,000trained,accreditedprofessionalsandnearly5,000certifiedprojects
withanother20,000intheprocessofpursuingcertification. Eachoftheseprojectscontainsadistinct,
sometimesunique,combinationofgreenbuildingstrategies. Eachstrategyachievedbyeverycertifiedprojectis
recordedwithUSGBCandpotentiallyavailableforanalysis. Eachprojectisalsoassociatedwithaprojectteam,
typicallyincludingaLEEDAccreditedProfessional. EachLEEDAPhasdemonstratedafamiliaritywithgreen
buildingconceptsand,atminimum,possessesaworkingvocabularytodescribeimportantaspectsofbuilding
performanceandexperience.
Ultimately,LEEDprovidesanumberofimportantelementstotheconfluenceofhumanexperienceandVGI.
LEEDbringsexplicitaspirationsorintentsforindividualgreenbuildingstrategies,verificationofthe
implementationstrategiesonspecificprojects,andacadreoftrainedprofessionals.
ImportanceofGreenBuildingGreenbuildingisamovementdedicatedtothetransformationofpracticeinthedesign,construction,and
operationofbuiltenvironments. Theobjectiveistoreducethenegativeimpactsofbuiltenvironmentswhile
creatinghealthy,
comfortable,
and
economically
prosperous
places
for
people
to
live,
work,
and
play.
The
populartermgreenbuildingencompassesthecollectionofprocesses,institutions,andindividualsthatserve
toassesscurrentpractice,identifyopportunitiesforimprovement,developanddeploytools,andprovide
independentreviewandrecognitionofresults. Thegreenbuildingcommunityhasdiversifiedfromitsoriginsin
thearchitectureandengineeringprofessionstoencompassthefullrangeofprofessionalsinvolvedinlifecycleof
builtenvironments.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
7/14
6
AAppppllyyiinnggVVGGIIttooEEvvaalluuaatteeGGrreeeennBBuuiillddiinnggSSttrraatteeggiieessrreellaatteeddttooHHuummaannEExxppeerriieenncceeWebelievethatitispossibletoappreciatethecurrentstateofpracticeanddevelopresearchprogramsthat
strivetoaddresstheseissuesandcreaterealandsystematicconnectionsbetweenconcepts,greenbuilding
practice,andevidencebasedevaluation. Thisinvolvescreatingthefoundationofdataneededtocritically
evaluategreenbuildingstrategiesastestablehypotheses. Eachprojecthasthepotentialtocontributeasample
toalargescaleexperimentintheefficacyofgreenbuildingstrategies. Withover5,000certifiedprojectsand
tensofthousandsmoreontheway,thepotentialexistsforpowerful,realworldtests.
Realizingthisvisionrequiresintegratinggreenbuildingratingcertificationprocesseswithsystemstocombine
data,analyzeresults,andultimatelycreateusefulinformationabouttheeffectivenessofdifferentstrategies.
Suchiterativeprocessesofcontinuousimprovementunderliemanysuccessfulenterprises(e.g.,theDeming
Cycleofplan,do,study,act). Inthehealthsciences,suchprocessesmaybedescribedasevidencebased
practice. Intheenvironmentalsciences,theymightbereferredtoasadaptivemanagement. Thegreenbuilding
communityhasbeguntheprocessofcreatingandoperationalizingsuchsystemsforkeyenvironmentalimpacts,
particularlyenergyandwaterconsumption. However,systematicattentiontohumanexperienceandhealth
outcomesasexplicitlytestablephenomenalagsbehind.
Webelievetheconvergenceoffactorsdescribedabovecreatesthepotentialforbuildingoccupantstoliterally
actassensorswiththeirpersonalexperiencesprovidingdatathatcanbeusedtoevaluatethesuccessofgreen
buildingstrategies. Wenowhavetheabilitytoturntheexperienceofspaceintodataontheconsequencesof
thatexperience,suchasphysicalactivity,chemicalexposures,comfort,evenhappiness. Thechallengeisto
developtheconceptsandmethodsneededtoturntheseemerginginformationtechnologiesintosystematic
toolstoinformandimprovegreenbuildingpractice.
IntegrationUnderstanding
human
experience
in
built
environments
is
a
complex
business.
New
sensors
and
information
technologiescreateunprecedentedopportunities,buttheyarenotsufficientinandofthemselves. Thereal
challengeistocreateanddeployascalablehierarchyofmethodsthatincludetimelyandrelevantquestions,
rigorousexperimentaldesign,traditionalsurvey andinterviewbasedmethods,existingandemergingsensors,
andcuttingedgeinformationtechnology. Inthiscontext,thescienceoftechnologyisenabled(orconstrained)
bytheartsofsystemsarchitectureandexperimentaldesign.
GGrreeeennBBuuiillddiinnggSSttrraatteeggiieessRReellaatteeddttooHHuummaannEExxppeerriieenncceeAswebegintoconsidertheopportunitiescreatedbythesenewapproachesandtechnologies,itisimportantto
askwhatkindsofquestionscanbeansweredaboutoccupantexperience. Apreliminaryanalysis6ofthree
widelyused
LEED
rating
systems
suggests
that
from
aquarter
to
almost
half
of
credits
can
potentially
be
evaluatedusinginformationaboutoccupantexperience. Inotherwords,forthesecreditswebelievethatis
possible,andinsomecasesnecessary,touseinformationonhumanexperiencetodeterminewhether
implementationofastrategyfulfillstheintentofthecredit.
6Allfiguresarebasedonapreliminarybutthoroughanalysis.InnovationinDesign,InnovationinOperations,Innovation
andDesignProcess,andRegionalPrioritycreditsarenotincludedincalculations.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
8/14
7
Thefractionofcreditintentsthatcanbeaddressedwithinformationonhumanexperiencevariesbetween
ratingsystems. Thisistobeexpectedsincethesystemsfocusondifferentmarketsegmentsanddifferent
periodsinthelifecycleofbuiltenvironments. Surprisingly,thesmallestfractionoftestablecreditswasfoundin
theLEEDforExistingBuildings:Operations&Maintenanceratingsystemwithonly25%ofcreditintents
directlyrelatedtohumanexperience. Conversely,42%ofcreditintentsinLEEDforNeighborhood
Developmentcouldbeevaluatedusinginformationonhumanexperience.
Opportunitiestotestcreditintentsalsovarybycreditcategory. InLEEDforNewConstructionandLEEDfor
ExistingBuildings:O&M,themajorityoftestableopportunitiesrelatedtoIndoorEnvironmentalQuality(IEQ).
Thisincludes82%ofIEQcreditsinLEEDforNewConstructionand67%ofIEQcreditsinLEEDforExisting
Buildings:O&M. TheseIEQstrategiesrelatetooccupantcontrol,comfort,andsatisfaction. LEEDfor
NeighborhoodDevelopmentsNeighborhoodPattern&Design(NPD)creditcategoryhadthegreatestfractionof
potentiallytestablestrategiesrepresentingapproximately89%ofcredits. TheseLEEDforNeighborhood
Developmentstrategiesrelatedirectlytoexperienceinandaroundneighborhoods,suchastheprovisionofsafe
andcomfortablestreetsandaccesstoadiverserangeofcommunityservices,includingschools,shops,parks
andpublictransport.
Figure1(a):PreliminaryanalysisofthedistributionoftestingmethodsforLEEDforNewConstruction(NC),LEED
forExistingBuildings:O&M(EB),andLEEDforNeighborhoodDevelopment(ND)credits. Yaxisrepresentsthe
fractionofLEEDcreditintentthatmaybeaddressedbyVolunteeredGeographicInformation(VGI),building
performanceinformation(BPI),nottestablebyeitherVGIorBPI.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
9/14
8
Figure1(b):LEEDforNeighborhoodDevelopment.YaxisrepresentsthefractionofLEEDcreditintentthatmaybe
addressedbyVolunteeredGeographicInformation(darkblue),buildingperformanceinformation(purple),not
testablebyeitherVGIorBPI(green). XaxiscategoriesincludeSmartLocationandLinkage(SLL),Neighborhood
PatternandDesign(NPD),andGreenConstructionandTechnology(GCT).
Figure1(c):LEEDforNewConstruction.YaxisrepresentsthefractionofLEEDcreditintentthatmaybe
addressedbyVolunteeredGeographicInformation(darkblue),buildingperformanceinformation(purple),not
testablebyeitherVGIorBPI(green). XaxiscategoriesincludeSustainableSites(SS),WaterEfficiency(WE),
EnergyandAtmosphere(EA),MaterialsandResources(MR),andIndoorEnvironmentalQuality(IEQ).
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
10/14
9
Figure1(d):LEEDforExistingBuildings.YaxisrepresentsthefractionofLEEDcreditintentthatmaybeaddressed
byVolunteeredGeographicInformation(darkblue),buildingperformanceinformation(purple),nottestableby
eitherVGIorBPI(green). XaxiscategoriesincludeSustainableSites(SS),WaterEfficiency(WE),Energyand
Atmosphere(EA),MaterialsandResources(MR),andIndoorEnvironmentalQuality(IEQ).
Wealsonotethatinformationbasedonhumanexperiencespecificallyaddressesstrategiesthatarenot
currentlycapturedbymonitoringenergyorwateruse. Asillustratedabove,nearly70%ofEnergy&Atmosphere
(EA)and100%ofWaterEfficiency(WE)creditscanbeevaluatedtosomedegreebyanalyzingutilitybills,or
throughtheuseoftechnologysuchasSmartMeters. ThesamecannotbesaidoftheSustainableSites(SS),
IndoorEnvironmentalQuality(IEQ),orNeighborhoodPattern&Design(NPD)creditcategoriesforwhichno
analogousmethodofscalabledatacollectionandevaluationiscurrentlyinpractice. Whileasteadystreamof
informationonbuildingenergyandwateruseisunquestionablyvaluable,thesestrategiesrepresentonly11%
(LEEDforNeighborhoodDevelopment),19%(LEEDforNewConstruction),and24%(LEEDforExistingBuildings:
O&M)ofavailablecredits. Intotal,thisrepresentsapproximately18%ofthecreditsacrossthethreesurveyed
LEEDratingsystems. Conversely,nearly33%ofcreditsarepotentiallytestableusingVGItocollectinformation
relatingtooccupantexperience(Figure2).
Thisillustratesthatsustainable,scalableflowsofinformationaboutoccupantexperienceareanessential
complementtootherdataonbuildingperformance. TheuseofVGItorecordactualhumanexperiencewithin
thebuiltenvironmentoffersatremendousopportunitytofillthisgap,whilealsoevaluatingtheeffectivenessof
greenbuildingstrategiesinimprovingthehealth,safety,andwellbeingofoccupants.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
11/14
10
Figure2(a):CumulativeTotals LEEDforNewConstruction,LEEDforExistingBuildings,andLEEDfor
NeighborhoodDevelopmentTestableCredits. YaxisrepresentsthefractionofLEEDcreditintentthatmaybe
addressedbyVolunteeredGeographicInformation(blue),buildingperformanceinformation(red),nottestable
byeitherVGIorBPI(green).
NNeexxttSStteeppssThispaperdescribessomeoftheelementsofanewvisionforbroad,spatiallyandtemporallyextensivedataon
humanexperienceinbuiltenvironmentscoupledwithiterativeprocessestodriveimprovementingreen
buildingpractice. Webelievethatwecanmakeimmediateprogressbytargetingspecificgreenbuilding
strategieswhichlendthemselvestodemonstrationoftheseconcepts,suchas:
Walkability.Strategies
in
LEED
for
Neighborhood
Development
include
detailed
prescriptions
for
street
and
sidewalkdesigntopromotewalkability. Theserequirementsarebasedonsignificantscientificliterature;
however,theseformbasedpredictionsessentiallyrepresenttestablehypothesesabouthowpeoplewill
experiencethesestreetscapes.
Question: Dopeopleactuallyexperiencestreetsaswalkable?
Greenbuildingintent: Promotewalkingasamodeoftransportation.
Humanexperiences: Perceivespaceaswalkable;increasewalking;higherlevelsofphysicalactivity
VGIstrategy: Queryoccupantaboutperceptionsandactivitylevelswhiletheyareinand
aroundthearea.
Diverselanduses. EveryLEEDratingsystemhassomeversionofstrategiestorecognizeandrewardstrategies
thatpromotelandusediversity. Theintentistypicallytoencouragepedestrianaccesstoservicesandreduce
useofautomobiles. Forexample,LEEDrewardsprojectsforhavingacertainnumberoflanduseswithina
certaindistanceofaproject.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
12/14
11
Questions: DopeopleactuallyexperienceareasaroundLEEDprojectsthatachievethese
creditsasdiverseandconnected? Dotheyusetheseservices? Dotheywalkto
them?
Greenbuildingintent: Promotedense,connectedcommunities;promotewalkingasamodeof
transportation.
Humanexperiences: Perceivecommunitiesasdiverse,vibrant,andconnected;uselocalservicesto
meettheir
needs.
VGIstrategy: Queryoccupantaboutperceptionsandactivitylevelswhiletheyareinand
aroundthearea.
OccupantComfort.Greenbuildingincludesanumberofstrategiesthatareintendedtoworktogethertocreate
andsustainhealthy,comfortableindoorenvironments. Aswithneighborhoods,thesegreenbuildingstrategies
aremostoftenprescriptiveorformbasedmetrics,suchasmeasuresofaccesstodaylightorventilationrates.
Thetraditionalmethodofdatacollectionistheoccupantsurvey. Surveyshavebeenusedeffectivelyto
understandoccupantexperience;however,thisdevicetypicallylackstheabilitytoprovidespatialandtemporal
detail.
Questions: Dooccupantsofprojectsthatutilizestrategiestopromoteindoor
environmentalqualityactuallyexperiencethatspaceashealthierandmore
comfortable?
Greenbuildingintent: Providecomfortable,satisfying,andproductivespacesforoccupants.
Humanexperiences: Perceivespacesascomfortableandhealthy;increaseproductivity,reduce
complaints,andimprovehealthoutcomes.
VGIstrategy: Queryoccupantaboutperceptionsandactivitylevelswhiletheyareinand
aroundthearea.
CCoonncclluussiioonnWehaveanopportunitytoshiftgreenbuildingfromtheimplementationofBestPracticestowardanevidence
basedpracticebasedonpracticebasedevidence. Thistransitionwillrequireustoidentifyopportunitiesto
adapttechnologytobetterservethepurposeofunderstandinghumanexperienceinwaysthatcreate
systematicinformationthatcanbecombinedwithtraditionallycollecteddataandemergingsensortechnology.
Takentogether,asustained,integrativeapproachtounderstandingpeople,information,analytics,andpractice
canhelpdrivemarkettransformationinwaysthatincreasetheprevalenceofpracticesthatdemonstrably
improvehumanexperienceinbuiltenvironments.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
13/14
12
RReeffeerreenncceessAbbaszadeh,S.,Zagreus,L.,Lehrer,D.,Huizenga,C.2006.Occupantsatisfactionwithindoorenvironmental
qualityingreenbuildings.ProceedingsofHealthyBuildings,Lisbon.VolumeIII:365370.
Arnold,J,Cochrane,L.2009.Futureopportunitiesfortheenergyecosystem.PowerEngineeringJuly2009.2
pages.
Baum,M.2007.GreenBuildingResearchFunding:AnAssessmentofCurrentActivityintheUnitedStates.U.S.
GreenBuildingCouncil.37pages.
Boulos,M.N.K.,Wheeler,S.2007.TheemergingWeb2.0socialsoftware:anenablingsuiteofsociable
technologiesinhealthandhealthcareeducation.HealthInformationandLibrariesJournal.24(1):223.
Brager,G.S.,Paliaga,G.,anddeDear,R.2004.Operablewindows,personalcontrol,andoccupantcomfort.
ASHRAETransactions:Research.RP1161:1735.
Browning,W.D.,Romm,J.J.1994.GreeningtheBuildingandtheBottomLine.15pages.
CaliforniaDepartmentofGeneralServices.2002.RealEstateServicesDivision.
CarnegieMellonUniversity,CenterforBuildingPerformanceDiagnostics.eBIDS.http://cbpd.arc.cmu.edu/ebids.
Dannenberg,A.L.,Jackson,R.J.,Frumkin,H.,Scieber,R.A.,Pratt,M.Kochtitzky,C.,Tilson,H.H.2003.Theimpact
ofcommunitydesignandlandusechoicesonpublichealth:ascientificresearchagenda.AmericanJournal
ofPublicHealth93(9):15001508.
Dearry,A.2004.Impactsofourbuiltenvironmentonpublichealth.EnvironmentalHealthPerspectives
112(11):A600A601.
Ewing,R.,Kreutzer,R.2006.UnderstandingtheRelationshipbetweenPublicHealthandtheBuiltEnvironment.
137pages.
Fisk,W.J.2000.ReviewofHealthandProductivityGainsFromBetterIEQ.14pages.
Goodchild,M.F.2007.CitizensasVoluntarySensors:SpatialdatainfrastructureintheWorldofWeb2.0.
InternationalJournalofSpatialDataInfrastructuresResearch.2:2432.
Green,L.W.2006.Publichealthasksforsystemsscience:toadvanceourevidencebasedpractice,canyouhelp
usgetmorepracticebasedevidence.AmericanJournalofPublicHealth96(3):406409.
Kaplan,R.Kaplan,S.1989.Theexperienceofnature:Apsychologicalperspective.CambridgeUniversityPress.
Kats,G.2003.TheCostsandFinancialBenefitsofGreenBuildings,AReporttoCaliforniasSustainableBuilding
TaskForce.
Kats,G.2010.GreeningourBuiltWorld:Costs,Benefits,andStrategies.IslandPress.258pages.
KettelKahn,L.,etal.2009.RecommendedCommunityStrategiesandMeasurementstoPreventObesityinthe
UnitedStates.MorbidityandMortalityWeeklyReport58(RR07):126.
McGinnis,J.M.,Foege,W.H.1993.ActualcausesofdeathintheUnitedStates.JournaloftheAmericanMedical
Association270:22072012.
McGrawHillConstruction.2006.GreenBuildingSmartMarketReport.42pages.
McGraw
Hill
Construction.
2008.
The
Green
Home
Consumer:
Driving
Demand
for
Green
Homes.
33
pages.
McNeill,D.L.,Wilkie,W.L.1979.Publicpolicyandconsumerinformation:impactofnewenergylabels.The
JournalofConsumerResearch6(1):111.
Milton,D.P.et.al.2000.RiskofSickLeaveAssociatedwithOutdoorAirSupplyRate,Humidification,and
OccupantComplaints.IndoorAir10(4):pp.21221.
Nelson,A.,Rakau,O.,Dorrenberg,P.2010.Greenbuildings:anichebecomesmainstream.DuetscheBank
Research.April12,2010.24pages.
-
7/28/2019 Docs 7383
14/14
13
OReilly,T.2007.WhatisWeb2.0:Designpatternsandbusinessmodelsforthenextgenerationofsoftware.
Communications&Strategies1:17.
Peuquet,D.J.1994.ItsAboutTime:Aconceptualframeworkfortherepresentationoftemporaldynamicsin
GeographicInformationSystems.AnnalsoftheAssociationofAmericanGeographers.84(3):441461.
Simons,H.,Kushner,S.,Jones,K.,James,D.2003.Fromevidencebasedpracticetopracticebasedevidence:the
ideaofsituatedgeneralization.ResearchPapersinEducation18(4):347364.
Romm,J.J.
1994.
Lean
and
Clean
Management.
Troped,P.J.,Wilson,J.S.,Matthews,C.E.,Cromley,E.K.,Melly,S.J.2010.Thebuildenvironmentandlocation
basedphysicalactivity.AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine38(4):429438.
TrowbridgeM.J.,McDonaldN.2008.UrbanSprawlandDailyMilesDrivenbyTeenagersintheUnitedStates.
AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine.34(3):202206.
U.S.GreenBuildingCouncil,2009.PresentationsentitledAboutUSGBCandAboutLEED.