Transcript
  • 5/24/2018

    1/11

    AHC2014-A-11-203-1

    21

    1 - [email protected] [email protected]

    . . .

    .

    . . . RMS. . .

    .

    . .

    :

  • 5/24/2018

    2/11

    71392

    2

    -1 . . . . . . .

    . .

    ]12[.

    5060 . . . .

    . . 1 2 . . .

    3 .

    1 WindFloat2Principle Power Inc. (PPI)

    3 Heave Plates

  • 5/24/2018

    3/11

    71392

    3

    4 5 6 7.2009 2010]3[ . . ]]42011 .

    2009 8 5]5[

    NREL. 9 10 . .

    OC3 ]6[. ]]7 .

    . . .]7[. .

    .. . .

    . ]4[.

    4 Added Mass

    5 Heave

    6Roll7 Pitch

    8 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)

    9International Energy Agency (IEA)

    10The Offshore Code Comparsion Collaboration (OC3, OC4)

  • 5/24/2018

    4/11

    71392

    4

    -2 (1) ]46[ .

    ( .1 ) .(1)

    90

    (1) NREL

    6/7746/3475/6

    110240 126

    4/1125

    1011 15

    46 10 1/2

    5/117

    124640

    3-

    11 Airgap

    12 Displacement

  • 5/24/2018

    5/11

    71392

    5

    ]12[. ]]3 .50 13 ]8[. BMO14

    5/6 .5095/6 -4

    . .

    . . -

    . - . - ]9[ - -. :

    (1) 3 33ma

    aF m u t ma3Fa33m u t.

    15.- ]10[ .

    : (2) 1

    1

    2D w D PF C A u t u t

    D1F PA DCw u t . x t

    :(3) 2

    1

    2 D w D P

    ViscF C A x t x t B x t

    Visc

    B .]11[ 5/7 .

    13 JONSWAP14British Meteorological Office

    15 Keulegan-Carpenter parameter

  • 5/24/2018

    6/11

    71392

    6

    . )(2 (3( ]12[ .

    . ]9[ 16-

    .]17]13 :]]14(4)

    3 3

    33

    8 4

    3 3a w h wm R R

    hR R . 9/0. .]]15

    ) (4 Y. :(5)33 w wpC gA

    (6) 55 wpAw yy B GC g I z mgz 33C55C wpA

    Bz wpAyyIgGz Y.

    . :]]16(7)

    2 2

    33 30

    ,8

    H

    w g

    KB Q d

    gV

    K H33B g gV2

    . 3Q ,

    . X . . (( .( )3 7( )

    (8).

    16 McCamy & Fuchs17Weggel, 1994

  • 5/24/2018

    7/11

    71392

    7

    (8) 3333 333333

    2 ,C aC

    BB M m C

    B

    33

    BC33B a 33M m .

    ( 9( :10( )(9)

    2

    2 2 2

    , , 3,5 , 0

    -

    j

    j

    jj a jjjj

    QRAO j

    C M m B

    (10) 2

    R j jS RAO S (S( jRAO R jS j.: (11)

    0 R jj dM SR S

    5- RMS .

    .RMS . . ..(2 )RMS

    .

    RMS((2

  • 5/24/2018

    8/11

    71392

    8

    95/9 . . .. .( 3 )RMS .

    RMS((3 .

    . . 52/0 . . 52/0 .

    ( 4 )RMS . D . 15. . (3)

  • 5/24/2018

    9/11

    71392

    9

    )52/0 4 ) . . . ((4 3/10 .

    ((4 ( 5) RMS

    .RMS .

    (5)

  • 5/24/2018

    10/11

    71392

    10

    . . ( .3 ( . Y . . 86 .

    6-RMS . 95/9 . . . . . .

    . . - .

    7- 1. Mostafaeipour, A., 2010. Feasibility Study of Offshore Wind Turbine Installation in Iran Compared with the

    World. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, pp. 17221743.

    2. Reiszadeh, M., and Motaha, S., 2011. The Wind Energy Potential in the Coasts of Persian Gulf Used in Designand Analysis of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine. World Renewable Congress, Sweden.

    3. Roddier, D., Cermelli, C., Aubault, A., and Weinstein, A., 2010. Windfloat: a Floating Foundation forOffshore Wind Turbines. Journal Of Renewable And Sustainable Energy 2, .pp. 033104103310434.

    4. Roddier, D., Antoine, P., Alexia, A., and Joshua, W., 2011. A Generic 5 MW Windfloat for Numerical ToolValidation & Comparison Against a Generic Spar. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Ocean,

    Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rotterdam, OMAE2011-50278.

  • 5/24/2018

    11/11

    71392

    11

    5. Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., and Scott, G., 2009. Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbinefor Offshore System Development. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.

    6. Jonkman, J., 2010. Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3. National Renewable EnergyLaboratory, Report No. NREL/TP-500-47535.

    .7 1392. .

    .8 1392. .9. Chakrabarti, S., 1994. Hydrodynamics of Offshor Structures. Computational Mechanics Publications.

    Southampton, Boston.

    10. Sadeghi, K., Incecik, A., and Downie, M.J., 2004. Response analysis of a truss spar in the frequency domain.Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 8, pp. 126-137.

    11. PPI, 2010. WWF Concept Design Deliverable #2. Principle Power Inc., 2nd Quarter Reporting, DOEGRANT DEEE0002652.

    12. Borgman, L. E., 1967. Ocean Wave Simulation For Engineering Design. Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory,Berkeley, California, Report No. HEL-9-13.

    13. Weggel, D. C., 1994. Hydrodynamic Forces on TruncatedCylinders. OffshoreTechnology Research Centre,Texas, USA, Report No. NSF # CDR-8721512.

    14. Brennen, C. E., 1981. A Review o f Added Mass and Fluid Inertial Forces. Naval Civil EngineeringLaboratory, California, Report No. CR 82.010.

    15. Kvittema, M. I., Bachynskib, E. E., and Torgeir, M., 2012. Effects of hydrodynamic modelling in fully coupledsimulations of a semi-submersible wind turbine. Energy Procedia, 24, pp. 351-362.

    16.Newman, J. N., 1977. Marine Hydrodynamic. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Top Related