-
15 1(2014): pp.87-128
1)
*
50 .
. , 1970 1970 , () . 1970 , , , , 1980 , , , , , , , , , .IMF 21 , , . , .
, , , .
: , , , , , ,
, , , ,
-
88 15 1(2014)
. : ?
50
.
(, 1976; , 1984;
, 1996; , 2012) , 1970
1970
, ()
.
1970 , , ,
, 1980
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
,
.
IMF 21
, ,
.
,
.
, ()
(gendered) .
,
-
89
. =
.
,
.
(, 1949; 1969; , 1970; , 1983)
,
.
1945 1960
. ,
,
(, 1991).
,
.
(, 1980).
.
(
, 1988). ,
,
( , 1993).
,
-
90 15 1(2014)
.
?
? (family strategy)
? ,
.
.
.
,
(relevancy)
.
.
() ,
.
.
1960 .1) 1961 1990
-
91
50 2) 3)
.
, ,
, . 1960
,
, ,
(, 1961; 1962; 1963),
( , 1968)
.
1970
1) 1960 . (1949) . 1960 1970 .
2) 50 559, 177, 40 ( , 1996). . 1) 1945 1995 2) , 1990 3) , 1984 18() 4) 5) . , 1960 18, 35 1970 42, 71, 1980 96, 101 1990 196 . 1990 (1964 ) (1996 , 1998 (1979 ) ) (1985 ) .
3) 30, 40, 50 (, 1976; , 1984; , 1996) . , , , , , , , , .
-
92 15 1(2014)
(, 1980)
.
,
(, 1974a; 1974b).
1980
(,
1981; 1982; , 1983) ,
,
.
(, 1981a; 1981b),
, ,
, ,
.
(, 1988; , 1988).
.
,
,
,
(, 1993) .
.
-
93
,
.
,
.
, ,
(, 1965;
, 1985; , 1987). ,
,
,
.
1960, 70 ,
(, 1967; , 1971).
,
.
1980
(, 1985; , 1987),
( ,
-
94 15 1(2014)
1992; , 1994).
(, 2002).
1990
, 1960, 70
.
.
,
(, 1990; ,
1995) .
,
.
.
, 1970
(, 1971;
, 1973) , 1980
(, 1991; , 1992) (, 1992),
, , (, 1986; , 1986;
-
95
, 1992) (, 1987; 1992)
.
,
(institutional) (companionship)
, ,
.
,
,
.
- , 2
(, 1991; , 1992),
- (, 1977; , 1984;
, 1988) . -
, 1990
( , 1991; , 1991) (
, 1993; , 1995) .
, ,
, 3
.
,
,
.
-
96 15 1(2014)
,
1990 .
(, 1994; , 1994; , 1994),
, ,
(, 1992; , 1994).
(
, 1972; 1979). 1980
,
(,
1993).
(, 1992).
,
.
, , ,
,
,
(, 1974; , 1989; , 1989) .
(, 1986;
, 1992) .
-
97
.
1980, 90 1960, 70
,
.
(, 1980)
(, 1991; , 1991).
.
, ,
,
,
.
(, 1988; , 1990).
, ,
.
,
,
.
.
,
-
98 15 1(2014)
,
.
( , 1988;
, 1990) , , ,
, .
4)
.
.
1990
5),
,
, ,
, ,
,
.
4) , . 1980 (, 1977; 1982),
. (, 1991; , 2001; 2009) .
5) 1990 , .
-
99
.
(, 1986; , 1986)
(, 1994)
(, 2000; 2002; 2010) .
.
(, 1988; , 1991)
(, 1996;
, 2001),
(, 1996) (,
1996) ,
(,
1997) .
(,
1999; , 2000) ,
(, 2002)
.
,
, (
, 1990; , 2000), (, 1992),
(, 2001) . (justice)
-
100 15 1(2014)
(, 1995)
.
,
, ,
.
() ,
.
IMF
.
(, 1998) , -
( , 2003; 2009; , 2007; , 2011),
(, 2004; , 2005)
.
(, 2005; , 2009),
(, 2002; 2010; ,
2008), (,
2012) . (, 2004; , 2013)
.
-
101
,
.
.
(, 2001; , 2012; , 2013)
(, 2009; , 2010;
2011) .
(2012) 1980
.
. (
, 1996; , 2000; , 2000; , 2002)
,
(, 2000) .
2000
. (, 2010;
, 2012), ( , 2011),
( , 2009; , 2009; , 2010;
, 2011) ,
.
. , ,
( , 2002;
-
102 15 1(2014)
, 2006; , 2008; , 2010; , 2010),
(, 1996), (
, 2011) .
data
.
,
,
.
.
(, 2007; , 2007; , 2009), (
, 2004) .
1990
,
.
(, 2000; , 1999; 2002),
(, 1999; , 2001)
.
(1996; 1997)
.
,
.
-
103
.
,
(, 1998; , 1998;
, 1999; 2000; , 2001; , 2002),
(, 2000; , 2001) ,
(, 2000),
(, 1995; , 2003),
(ACT) ( , 2003)
.
(, 1995) (, 2000)
.
( , 2012; 2013; ,
2013).
,
.
,
(, 1995; , 1997; , 2000;
, 2003)
.
,
(, 2011; , 2013)
.
-
104 15 1(2014)
(, 1999; 2003),
(, 1996; , 2000; ,
2002; 2013; , 2013) .
. 90
( , 1995; , 2000) (
, 1995; , 1998)
.
( , 1998),
(, 2001),
(,
2002)
(, 2003),
(, 2010)
.
.
1.
.
.
,
,
-
105
,
,
.
,
.
,
. (pluralism)
.
.
(critical)
.
.
.
,
.
,
(, 2000)
(, 2000) .
.
,
6)
.
-
106 15 1(2014)
,
,
.
.
,
,
,
. ,
,
.
,
()
,
.
.
.
,
6) . , (1991: 191) , (1993) .
-
107
,
,
.
, ,
(, 2002)
.
.
. IMF
,
.
(, 2012).
,
.
.
(, 2013),
(,
2012).
-
108 15 1(2014)
.
.
(), , , 1
?
.
,
.
, .
.
,
?
,
.
2.
1) E. Zaretsky(1983)
,
.
.
,
-
109
.
C. (1977; 1997)
.
(intense scrutiny)
. ,
.
(degradation of work) ,
.
( , 1999).
,
. ,
.
. ,
,
, , , ,
.
,
.
,
-
110 15 1(2014)
( , 1993) .
.
.
,
.
,
.
2)
,
. (uncertainty)
.
,
,
,
.
? ? ?
? ?
? .
-
111
.
,
, .
. , , , , ,
,
.
,
3
.
,
. , , ,
, 10 , agenda
, ,
.
3
.
, ,
.
,
. 3
,
.
,
-
112 15 1(2014)
.
,
, , , , ,
.
.
.
,
. .
. .
,
.
.
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
.
, ,
.
,
-
113
.
,
.
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
.
.
, ,
( , 2012).
,
.
2014 6 17 2014 6 27 2014 6 29
-
114 15 1(2014)
. 2011. . 23(4): 123-145.
. 2005. . 65: 155-178.. 2002. .
17(2): 134-164.. 2010.
. 22(2): 95-120.. 2012. .
24(2): 39-63.. 1999. , :
. 15(2): 82-112.. 2001. .
49: 124-148.______. 2009. .
81: 131-168.. 2002. () -
? 55: 93-118.. 1995. .
29(3): 48-71.. 2000. -
. 34(1): 63-82.
. 2012.
. 24(2): 64-100. . 2000. (3):
. 34(4): 226-256.
-
115
. 2008. . 20(4): 143-182.
. 2003. ' ' -
'' '' -. 59: 193-223.______. 2004. .
38(5): 209-233.. 2011. . 23(3):
63-91.
. 2007. , ,
: -
. 41(5): 134-162.. 2006. . 70:
10-37.
. 2001. . .______. 2007.
. 41(6): 51-78.. 2012.
: . 25(3): 54-96.. 2013.
: . 47(4): 35-65.
. 1999. : 1920-30 .
15(1): 146-177.______. 2000. -,
. 58: 71-105.______. 2012. 1980 :
. 24(4): 166-195.______. 2013. ?: IMF
-
116 15 1(2014)
. 47(2): 101-141.. 2009. () :
. 43(4): 180-220.. 1992.
. 3: 278-314.. 2001. :
. 35(4): 213-244.. 2008. :
. 42(2): 36-71.. 1995. . 46:
182-212.
. 2002. /
. 61: 250-277.. 2000. :
. 34(3): 119-146.______. 2012. , , .
21: 327-375.. 2005.
. 68: 133-160. . 2002. - .
36(2): 181-212.. 1999. 17 .
33(4): 1-15.
______. 2002. 16 () () : []
. 18(1): 1-32.
______. 2004. -
. 65: 205-234.
-
117
______. 2005. ()
. 68: 137-166.______. 2006. ().
70: 179-208.
______. 2007.
. 75: 187-218.. 2003. : .
2: 293-325.
. 2002. ,
. 36(2): 149-180.. 2001. .
17(2): 65-94.
. 1999. :
. 33(1): 1-40.______. 2003. : .
37(3): 1-24.. 1990. . 6: 153-182.. 2001. :
. 5(1): 1-31.. 2005. -1960~70
''. 67: 260-299.. 1991. ? 3: 55-68.. 2011. . 91: 99-131.. 2007. . 73: 107-141. . 2005. .
39(4): 198-230.. 2005. :
. 39(1): 111-136.
-
118 15 1(2014)
______. 2013.
. 25(3): 31-53.. 2001. , -
. 51: 97-122.______. 2010. .
22(4): 63-94.______. 2011. :
. 45(4): 64-96.. 1996. :
, , . 12(2): 1-41.. 2000. . .. 2009. . 15:
331-349.
______. 2010. . 17: 257-277.. 2006. , : ,
. 40(6): 56-91.. 1996. . 50: 68-95.. 2006. . 72:
131-167.
. 2000. . 3: 89-132.
. 1995. . 46: 106-140.
______. 2000a. -
. 58: 35-70.______. 2000b. : .
16(1): 61-89.______. 2002. :
-
119
. 36(5): 201-229.______. 2010.
. 88: 215-255.. 2001. . 49:
72-101.
. 2013. :
. 47(4): 67-106.. 2012. .
20: 265-306.. 2011. - . 23(3):
127-160.
. 2009. . 15: 297-329.
. 1995. -, ,
. 46: 141-181. ______. 2001a. :
. 35(6): 105-139.
______. 2001b. -
. 60: 130-165. . 2000. . .. 1993.
. 62(2): 5-28.______________. 1996. 50 .
1: 1-58. . 2000. : .
34(2): 85-112.. 2001. 40 : .
-
120 15 1(2014)
35(4): 195-220.______. 2003. :
. 37(3): 25-57.______. 2008. :
30 . 42(6): 38-67.______. 2012. :
. 46(4): 176-204.. 1998. . 32(1):
61-95.
. 2010. . 44(4): 32-62.
______. 2013. :
. 47(2): 143-176.. 2001. :
. 35(5): 181-208.. 2007. .
11: 123-167.______. 2012. : 1995-2010.
24(3): 34-64.
. 2002.
: . 36(6): 137-164.
. 1995. : .
29(2): 24-40.. 2009.
. 21(1): 1-28.. 2013. .
25(3): 128-158.
-
121
. 2011.
. 91: 269-308.. 2009. .
21(4): 63-94.. 1996. , , .
30(3): 48-75.______. 1997. : []
. 31(3): 130-135.. 2011. . 23(1): 41-76.______. 2012. . 24(1):
31-70.
. 2012.
. 25(1): 39-76.. 2007. . 75:
5-38.
. 1996. . 12(2): 42-76.. 1995. . 46:
11-70.
. 1995. . 11: 41-65.______. 1999. .
15(2): 50-81.______. 2000. . 58:
11-34.
______. 2002. . .. 2004.
. 64: 172-208.. 2005. -
. 7: 7-48.
-
122 15 1(2014)
. 1996. -
. 48: 133-164.. 2002. , , . 36(6): 195-213.. 2003. 11 .
64: 47-67.
. 1995. 19 -
. 46: 71-105.______. 2002. -
. 62: 204-226.______. 2006. () . 71:
251-280.
. 1996. . 30(4): 44-70.
. 1996. . 30(4): 25-43.
. 2006.
: . 40(5): 258-298. . 1988. . .______. 2003. . .. 1998. . 40: 167-190.______. 2000.
34(4): 293-315.
. 2010.
. 22(1): 35-63.. 1992. - .
15: 173-204.______. 2011. . 23(3):
1-23.
-
123
. 2001. . 35(1): 52-84.______. 2002. :
. 36(4): 223-262.. 1999. .
33(1): 158-189.______. 2000. :
. 34(3): 169-208.______. 2007. . 41(2):
118-146.
______. 2008. , , . 42(3): 63-85.. 1993. .
3: 191-195.. 1999.
. . . 2001. , -
. 51: 38-67. . 2011. . 89:
105-145.
. 2004. - . 65: 6-42.
. 1996. - . 50: 96-133.
. 1986. . 2: 4-33.. 1986. :
. 2: 90-121.____. 1997. - ' '
. 51: 109-141.____. 1999. :
-
124 15 1(2014)
' '. 55: 73-102.____. 2000a. :
. 16(2):116-145.____. 2000b. .
58: 107-158.____. 2004. -
. 64: 148-173.____. 2006. . 71: 72-101.. 2004. -
. 65: 74-102.. 1992. . .. 1995. .
29(3): 72-95.
. 1993. . . . 1997 :
. 13(2): 189-230.. 2002. : .
36(1): 149-154.______. 2003. : , ,
. 37(1): 93-118.______. 2003. : , ,
. 37(1): 91-115.. 1985. . 17:
79-96.
______. 1986. : . 2: 131-200.
. 2001. . 60: 240-251.
-
125
. 1999.
: . 55: 145-193.
. 2003. :
(ACT) . 37(5): 1-30.
. 2012.
: . 46(2): 203-230.
. 2012.
. 24(4): 1-44.. 2011.
. 23(2): 1-40.. 1965. . .______. 1976. . .. 2009. :
." 43(4): 107-146.______. 2010. 2 :
. 8: 128-173.. 2008. .
4: 147-205.. 2010.
. 44(4): 1-31.. 2003. :
. 37(3): 57-81.. 2000. , :
. 34(3): 147-168.. 2009. .
-
126 15 1(2014)
21(1): 85-115.. 1984. . .______. 1997. . .. 1992. . 8: 72-95.. 1999. .
11(2): 47-72.
______. 2006. , . 9: 159-189.
______. 2012. :
. 25(2): 1-28.. 2007. () .
75: 151-186.. 2008.
. 79: 161-195.. 2011. /
? 90: 363-386.
Kim, Cheong-Seok. 2012. Intergenerational Living Arrangements of Young
Married Women in Korea, Japan and China. Korean Journal of
Sociology 46(3): 59-72.
Park, Hyunjoon, Jae Kyung, Lee & Inkyung Jo. 2013. Changing
Relationships between Education and Marriage among Korean
Women. Korean Journal of Sociology 47(3): 51-76.
Song, Min-Young. 2011. From Demographic to Normative Individualization:
A comparative study of family values in Korea and Japan. Korean
Journal of Sociology 45(6): 153-174.
-
127
Comprehensive and critical review of the sociology of family
Hahm, In-hee.Prof. Dept. of Sociology, Ewha Womans Univ.
Abstract
This paper intends to review the academic achievements for the last 50 years of the sociology of family, and to suggest the future research agenda. Chapter briefly outlines the flows of the research topics during the specific periods, and chapter tries to propose how to enrich the family studies from the interdisciplinary perspective.First, the number of the articles and the books of sociology of family areas showed the slow growth until 1970's, since then recorded significant developments. Until 1970's, main research agenda were mainly limited to the such topics as the family function, traditional kinship system, and the family of Shinla, Korea, and Yi dynasty. However, after the 1980s research subjects moved toward more diverse interests such as the feminist critic of the patriarchy, familism, sex and love, conjugal family's distinguishing features, full-time housewifery, family's class background, family problems and family policy, relations between the social structure and family life, family theories and methodologies, and the North Korean family etc..Beginning of the 21C, family studies embrace more broad concerns like crisis of the low fertility and the rapid ageing, increment of the multicultural families, the relationship between family and the state, and the market etc.. Also the outstanding developments of family history area should be noted.Recently a couple of debate topics emerged from the academic community. The family disruption vs. family restructuring debate is a typical example, and the collision between traditional familism and postmodern privatization, and the meaning of alternative life style are another examples.
-
128 15 1(2014)
Interdisciplinary approaches to the family studies, focusing on the family policy issues and the transnational aspects of families, and digging up new type of research data and methodology are suggested as the future research agenda.
Key words: sociology of family, kinship, familism, family problem, family policy, migration for marriage, family disruption, family reconstruction, post-modern privatization, transnationality of family
