1
Scotland 26. – 27. April 2015
Helge Ramsdal
Østfold University College
Never-ending Reforms - Collaboration in Health and Social Care in Norway
2
«Collaboration in mental health care»
«The health and social care system»
20 % of work force in health and social services
Scandinavian traditions: «the profession state»
Modernisation: quality, cost efficiency, equality – from NPM to NPG
Challenges:
- Demographic changes
- Complexity – wicked problems (mental health, addiction, poor immigrants, …..
•
3
The Norwegian welfare state
• Pop.: 5 mill.
• A «municipal» welfare state: – 430 local authorities, «general» municipalities in charge of medical services,
elderly care, mental health, social services incl. housing (and much more).
• 19 counties: – Reduced role in health and social policies. Since 2002: public health issues
• State: – In charge of specialised services/hospitals since 2002, co-funding local
services, national guidelines etc.
4
Norway health and social policies - the context
The steering problem no. 1: Vertical coordination
– State and municipalities - state funding, local implementation.
But: 400 to 400.000 pop.
The steering problem no. 2: Horizontal integration
- Coordination of sectors, services, agencies, professionals at local levels.
But: local authority organisation models vary substantially
5
Never-ending reforms to obtain better integration and coordination:
1) NAV reform 2000: Labour, Insurance, Social services, integrating state and municipal social welfare services.
«One door» to all welfare services.
2) The Mental Health reform: 1999 – 2009: «A failure in all services» - focus on coordination of hospital and municipal services.
3) The Hospital Reform 2002:
Specialised health services/hospitals transfered from counties to state responsibility, regional and hospital authorities – the «NHS» NPM design.
6
3) The Coordination Reform: «Proper treatment at the right place and right time» - 2009 – 2017
Problems:
•More people are falling ill,
•population is ageing,
•more people need help for longer periods,
•more diseases are treatable with new technology, and the queues are lengthening for specialist health care services.
Challenges:
•Patients’ needs for coordinated services are not being sufficiently met.
•In the services there is too little initiative aimed at limiting and preventing disease.
•Population development and the changing range of illnesses among the population.
7
Measures - Key steps for proper treatment
Key step 1: A clearer role for the patient
•Patient pathways to «permeate» all services
•Contact point for the patient
•Review of the statutory framework –patients’ rights
Key step 2: New role for municipalities in future
•Future municipal tasks
•Binding system of agreements between municipalities and health authorities
•Reinforcing preventative health work
•Better medical services in the municipalities
8
Measures cont.
Key step 3: Financial incentives
•Municipal co-financing
•Municipal responsibility for patients ready for discharge
•Increased financial framework of the specialist health care services
Key step 4: Enabling the specialist health care services to apply their specialised competence more
•Administrative systems
•Competence
•Pilot hospitals
Key step 5: Facilitating better-defined priorities
•National Health Plan
9
3) The Coordination Reform – steering instruments
• Legal measures – «The idea of the new municipality» - e.g. abandoning the «professions’ protocol» and organization of local services – local «medical centres».
• Formal agreements between hospitals and municipalities on coordination related to e.g. diagnosis groups – patient pathways.
• Financial – municipal co-funding of hospital services
10
Four issues:
1. The Collaboration reform as a political steering innovation: - «new governance», or?...
2. «Patient pathways» - «scientific-bureaucratic medicine», or?...
3. Welfare technology (municipal care) – an «innovation journey», or?...
4. Preventive health care/public health - new methodologies for implementing well-known policies, or?...
11
1. The Collaboration reform as a political steering innovation: - «new governance», or?...
• The traditional reform design models of the Scandinavian welfare states (1945 – ca.1990) – mix of hierachic, detailed steering instruments
• A transition period: centralization and de-centralization – «the new municipality» (mental health reform and the hospital reform) (1990- 2000)
• The Collaboration reform – new governance/WOG? A «direction» reform – indirect steering instruments - dialogues
• Empirical studies on reform design (mix of steering instruments)
12
Collaboration reform - a «new governance» reform ?
Four research topics:
1) The Reform design – mix of steering instruments – will «new governance» approaches improve vertical coordination or will we see new schisms between municipal and hospital services?
2) The «process perspective» on coordination – what are the consequences of implementing patient pathways?
3) The introduction of welfare technologies in municipalties – will it reduce the need for care personell – more need for collaboration and coordination?
4) The strengthening of public health strategies - will new social engineering methodologies work?
13
14
«Hierarchical design» «Dialogic design»
Clearly defined operational goals ambiguous and non-operational goals
Clearly defined target group No clearly defined target group
based on legislation based on circulars, memos, etc.
earmarked funding funding through block grants
vertical management structures horizontal management structures
Unambiguous knowledge of cause-effect uncertain knowledge base
profession maintains knowledge no profession or many professions
state requirements for local implementation no local implementation agency specified
agencies by the state
Comparing four health reforms
15
Health Centre HVPU Psych. Coordination
Legislation yes yes no yes
Clearly defined goals yes yes no no
Ideological basis yes yes no no
Scientific-professional
basis yes no no no
Prof. compentence
required yes no no no
Earmarked funding yes yes yes no
Local design of actions
and services required yes no no no
Unambiguous
knowledge base yes yes no no
Vertical manage-
ment structures yes yes yes no
Local polit/admin imple-
mentation agencies yes no no no
Planning required no yes yes no
References
Ramsdal, Helge: From hierarchical steering to dialogic governance? An analysis of four welfare state reforms in Norway, in: Barroso, J. and L.M. Carvalho (eds.): Knowledge and Regulatory Processes in Health and Education Policies. EDUCA, Lisbon 2012. (Ch. 3, pp. 89 – 131).
Ramsdal, Helge and Mona. J. Fineide: Les défis de la réforme de la santé mentale. L’expérience de la Norvège (The Challenge of Mental Health Reform – Experiences from Norway). Revue de Sociologie de la Sante nr. 34, 2011 Autumn
Ramsdal, Helge, Mona J. Fineide: Clinical Pathways as regulatory tool in Mental Health Policies. Report on Regulations in Health Policies in Norway, KnowandPol, Project n° 0288848-2 co funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Program, October 2010, www.knowandpol.eu
The Coordination reform, English version:
http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/HOD/Dokumenter%20INFO/Samhandling%20engelsk_PDFS.pdf
16