-
B/C
*
B/C 0.22~0.29 3.71()
-
. *
-
, *
-
, ,
CVM , B/C
B/C
*
-
*
1,1561,1561,1502,268()(1,118)B/C 1.02B/C 0.51
-
. -
*
B/C 1.020.51
-
( )
-
!
, : , , 1996. , , , 1997.
() ! (Unish) 2001
*
-
( 1)
( 2) 10
( 3) B/C 5.44~11.97*
-
*
(), , , , , , , , , , , , ,
-
*
, , , , , , , ,
-
*
, , , , ,
-
1996 MB ( ) 1998 : ~
*
-
*
B/C5.44~11.971.145
-
(1996)
*
()72, 1( )1
-
( )
-
, , , , 2007, 617~644.
B/C 0.63
*
B/C 0.05~0.205.44~11.971.1452.3
-
, . : 11 .
( ) : 68 2 .
*
-
, . , B/C 2.3.
B/C .
*
-
*
14 2,335/ 11 7,000( 1) 1 6,843( 2) 1 4,488( 2) 8 4,323/ ( 3) 37 4,999 1 14 1,000 2 (7 5,000)( 4) 1 1,000 1 863( 2) 16 2,863
-
11 7
, , () (?) *
-
= + (import)
( )
= =
83%
*
()1010
-
, 2000 , 2004. 0.856. 0.83 .
B/C 1 0.83 0.144 .
*
-
: 2007 6~ 2008 1 .
(Contingent Valuation Method: CVM) : , ?
*
-
: , , , : , , : , , *
-
2 (-)
*
901459453387110 86WTP11,90910,2507,687(15,988,247)1,9041,6931,22830 1 6,8431 4,4981 863
-
.
*
CVM 50%(?)+ 1 6,84350%(?)+ 3,635- + 2 478
-
7 3
,
*
(A)-700,000 TEU700,000 TEU(B)1,129,149106,641(2006)-9,152864
-
? ?
:
: , .
*
-
? ()
*
USDT(1994)tow boatHC, CO, NOX
OECD(2001)(SO2 )CO, CO2, HC, NOX, SO2
(1997)CO, NOX
DHV(2007)CO, NOX
CO2
-
()
U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, Environmental Advantage of Inland Barge Transportation, 1994.
Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Control Lab, 1994
C. Jake Haulk, "Inland Waterways as Vital National Infrastructure: Refuting Corporate Welfare Attacks" AlleghenyInstitute for Public Policy. ()
*
-
. . , . .
*
-
: 7 3 ( : 1 1)
: (2001)
*
-
*
(2001)2 4,3171 222 6,0628,271-km 26430- (1TEU)4,480516(2007)- (1TEU) 2,6491949,152864
-
*
(2007) (2012)(, , , )9,152864(2001),,,, , , 2 4,3171 222(2007),, ,,,,4,3222,703
-
2 75 2 2020 2 2 2
*
-
*
14 2,335/ 11 7,000( 1) 1 6,843( 2) 1 4,488( 2) 8 4,323/ ( 3) 37 4,99914 2,335(a) 1 14 1,000 2 (7 5,000)( 4) 1 1,000 1 863( 2) 16 2,86322 7,000(b) (a)/(b)=.63
-
, , .
*
-
B/C 5.44~11.97
B/C 0.2 0.63 0.2 2.3 *
-
(): () ()
() () () () ()
() () () () 15 ()
*
-
:
.
.*
*