28-1-2016 AFSLUITINGSBIJEENKOMST Minor Oil & Gas
enMinor (offshore) Windenergie
Lichting 2015/ 2016
www.maritimecampus.nl
PROGRAMMA
15.15 uur: Welkomstwoord
- Jan Treffers – MCN, lid Werkveld Advies Commissie
- coördinatoren minoren
15.20 uur: Presentatie projecten door
- studenten minor (offshore) windenergie
- studenten minor olie en gas
17.00 uur: Afsluiting door Betty Johanns
17.15 uur: Netwerken met een drankje – hapje
18.00 uur: Einde bijeenkomst
www.maritimecampus.nl
PRESENTATIES
15.20 EEM Analyse Turbineblad
15.30 epoMAT Bladontwerp
15.40 ONEBV Protection dome Placement
15.50 testwagen kleine turbine
16.00 ENGIE Nogepa standaard 43
16.10 Base case offshore windfarm
16.20 OMRIN Power 2 Gas
16.30 NAM digitizing archive
16.40 VECTOR MM Reliable centered maintenance
16.50 ENGIE Egrid
www.maritimecampus.nl
Presentatie 1
Dia <nr> van 12
EEM analyse groep
Een EEM analyse toegepast op een windturbine blad
28-01-2016
Dia <nr> van 12
Projectleden
• Oemar Nanhekhan Petrochemie
• Mishel Barri Petrochemie
• Sjoerd Hettinga WTB
• Albert Siebering WTB
• Begeleider: Bauke Kuiper
Dia <nr> van 12
Inhoud
• Opdracht
• Wat is EEM
• Krachten op het blad
• Analyse in Solidworks
• Vergelijking tussen Solidworks en FOCUS6
• Vragen
Dia <nr> van 12
Opdracht
• Theoretische benadering
• EEM analyse in Solidworks
• Vergelijking tussen Solidworks en FOCUS6
• Walkthrough voor Solidworks EEM analyse
Dia <nr> van 12
Wat is EEM
• EEM = Eindige Elementen Methode
• Sterkte berekeningen
• Ingewikkelde constructies
Dia <nr> van 12
Krachten op het blad
• FLIFT
• FZ
• FMPZ
• FWIND
Dia <nr> van 12
Momenten op het blad
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Mo
me
nt
[kN
m]
graden [°]
Fz moment [kNm]
Lifmoment [kNm]
Totaalmoment [kNm]
• Lift grijpt aan op 2/3e deel van het blad• Fz grijpt aan op 1/3e deel van het blad• Shear• Blad 0°hoek
Dia <nr> van 12
Analyse in Solidworks
• Hoekverdraaiing 45°
• Vier krachten aangebracht
• Reactie krachten
Dia <nr> van 12
Vervolg analyse in Solidworks
1 5
0°Fx 102 kN
180°Fx -57 kN
Fy 270 kN Fy 270 kN
2 6
45°Fx 81 kN
225°Fx -30 kN
Fy 321 kN Fy 220 kN
3 7
90°Fx 29 kN
270°Fx 29 kN
Fy 343 kN Fy 199 kN
4 8
135°Fx -32 kN
315°Fx 81 kN
Fy 321 kN Fy 220 kN
1 5
0°
Fx 94 kN
180°
Fx -49 kN
Fy 268 kN Fy 268 kN
M0 1517 kNm M0 -331 kNm
2 6
45°
Fx 74 kN
225°
Fx -28 kN
Fy 318 kN Fy 217 kN
M0 1246 kNm M0 -60 kNm
3 7
90°
Fx 23 kN
270°
Fx 23 kN
Fy 340 kN Fy 196 kN
M0 593 kNm M0 593 kNm
4 8
135°
Fx -28 kN
315°
Fx 74 kN
Fy 319 kN Fy 217 kN
M0 -60 kNm M0 1246 kNmWaarden Solidworks
Waarden theorie
Dia <nr> van 12
Vergelijking tussen Solidworks en FOCUS6
• Resultaten van Solidworks en FOCUS6 vergelijken
– Niet gelukt
– Foutmelding
– Ingewikkeld
– Veel tijd in gestoken
Dia <nr> van 12
Vervolg vergelijking
• Wat was de bedoeling
– Zelfde blad
– Zelfde krachten
– Zelfde oriëntatie
– Vergelijken van inwendige spanningen
Dia <nr> van 12
Vragen?
Presentatie 2
Designing efficiënt small-size turbine
blades
Stefan Wilkens | Rutger Loerts | Pieter de Jong | Cornelis de Jong
Inhoud
• Opdrachtgever en opdracht
• Het Blad ontwerp en parameters
• Conclusie & aanbevelingen
• Vragen
Situatie schets
• epoMAT
– Composites
– Roping
• Kleine windturbine
– Full pitch
Opdracht
“Ontwerp een zo efficiënt mogelijk rotorblad dat geschikt is
voor toepassing op kleine, full pitch, windturbines.”
Wat is bladontwerp
Windsnelheid
Tip Speed Ratio
AirfoilsKoorde
distributie
Bladtwist
Soliditeit
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Freq
uen
tie
[-]
Windsnelheid [m/s]
Weibull
Energie in de wind?
Tip Speed Ratio
Koorde verdeling
Airfoil keuze
Airfoil keuze
Software is ook niet alles…
Soliditeit
Tool
Alternatieven
CAD Impressie
Afsluitend
Uitdagend, vooral aerodynamica
Veel onzekerheden in de theorie
Real-world resultaten onzeker
Vragen?
Presentatie 3
Subsea well preparation
Thursday January 28th , 2016
Team:
• Jeffry Dijkuis
• Nanne Post
• Danny van Driel
• Maurits van Gemert
• Hidde van Beekum
Thanks to:
Joan Horbeek, ONE drilling manager
Driss J Costa, Sr. Drilling engineer
42(42)
The assignment
Subsea well preparation:
• Location research – rig positioning
• Drill a 36”hole
• Run a 30” conductor
• Prepare a lift/ installation plan for a 90MT dome placement on the seabed
43(43)
In cooperation with:
L\/DE
44(44)
Contents
• Location
• Drill a 36”hole
• Run a 30” conductor
• Cement conductor
• Dome lifting and installation
• QHSE
• Conclusion
• Questions
45(45)
Location
• Military zone
• Pipeline
• Water depth
• Wildlife
46(46)
Operational working window
• High tide Dover
• Around slack tide
– Start drilling 36”hole
– Entering 36”hole
– Placing dome
47(47)
Drilling 36”hole
• Lithology: Upper North Sea group
• 36” diameter hole
• +/- 70 m below seabed
• 0 degrees inclination
48(48)
Bottom Hole Assembly
49(49)
30” Conductor/environmental riser
• 30” Run safe Dril-Quip conductor
– Yield strength 65.000psi
– collapse pressure:
– Burst pressure:
• Entering 36”hole
– White paint for ROV observation
• Cementing
– Collapse pressure considered with selection of conductor
50(50)
Cement operation
• Conductor support
• Prevent of fluid migration
• Stab-in shoe cement method
– Drillpipe
– Bow spring centralizers
– Cement dart plugs
51(51)
Cement slurry selection
• Tuned® Light XL-NL
– Low density to prevent formation fracks
– Rapid hardening
• Excess volume of 300%
– 50 tons of dry Tuned® Light XL-NL
– 34,5 cubic meters of fresh water
– 25 L of chemical Defoamer
52(52)
Dome
• Dome specs
Surface: 13,30m x 13,80mHeight: 6,80mWeight: 90MtProducer: NAMI B.V.Year of construction: 2008
53(53)
Dome transportation
• Vroon-Vos Paradise
– Clear deck Area: 850m²
– Breadth Moulded 18,00m
– Deck Loading 5t/m²
– Dome Area ±180m²
– Dome width 13,3m
– Dome Loading 0,5t/m²
54(54)
Dome placing
• Paragon C461 Rig Crane
– Lifting capacity 54Mt
• Top drive Vargo TDS-4S
– Lifting capacity 750Mt
Slings
Top Drive HWDP
Hoisting Eye
55(55)
Lift plan explained
56(56)
QHSE
• Ship moving.
• Bad use of instruments.
• Drilling of 36” open hole
• Drilling of 36” open hole
• Hanging-off of 20”extended conductor
• Hoisting of heavy equipment.
57(57)
QHSE BowTie
• Hoisting of dome
58(58)
QHSE Risk Assessment Matrix
• Hoisting of dome
59(59)
Conclusions/Recommendations
• Most suitable, practical and safest way for the operations
• Lifting & placement operations
during slack tide and calm winds
• QHSE models: visualisation operation risks
• Recommendations to ONE b.v. to make use of described barriers
60(60)
Questions?
Presentatie 4
Eindopdracht minor windenergie:
Ontwerpen testwagen kleine windturbine
Sion Bleker
Mark Kiewied
Dylan Possel
Marco Veensma
Inhoud
• Inleiding
• Opdracht
• Doel
• Onderzoeksfase
• Ontwerpfase
• Materiaalkeuze
• Eindontwerp
• Aanbeveling
Inleiding
• Kleine windturbines
• Testen van kleine windturbines
• Windtunnels
Opdracht
• `Ontwerp een testwagen voor de kleine
windturbine’
Doel:
• Een ontwerprapport schrijven, waarin een
omschrijving wordt gegeven voor een
realiseerbare testwagen voor het testen
van kleine windturbines, als alternatief
voor een windtunnel.
Onderzoeksfase
• Inzetbaarheid testwagen
• Metingen en verwerking
• Bevestiging testwagen
• Resultaten
Ontwerpfase
• Functie analyse
• Morfologische overzicht
Schetsen
Materiaalkeuze
Eindontwerp
Aanbeveling
• Elektrische componenten
• Testen van eindontwerp
Vragen?
Presentatie 5
Review of NOGEPA std. 43
Client: Henk WierengaStudents:Jens HorbeekJasper MoonenJohn de VosJoey Wolven 75
Content of the presentation
• Introduction
• Example of ambiguity in Dutch legislation
• Health Safety and Environmental
• Findings of the research
• Conclusion
• Recommendation
76
• Macondo, Deepwater Horizon
“everybody was reminded to the need of procedures andstandards”
“learned lessons from the accident where implemented intoindustrial guidelines and standards”
Introduction
77
Example of ambiguity in Dutch legislation
• Article 8.3.1.11
“The protection mechanism is constructed in a way that fluids can be pumped into the borehole without using the drilling equipment, while at the same time gas or liquids can be discharged through a choke manifold “
78
Blowout preventer
79
• Engie prefers not to circulate below the lowest ram becausethe lowest ram is the last resort to seal the well.
• State Supervision of Mines says, based on the article 8.3.1.11, you must build in the opportunity to circulate below the lowest ram.
• Main problem, legislation lacks clarity
80
Health, Safety, Environment & Quality
• Used Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) and Bowtie method
• Risk 1, Wrong information taken into the NOGEPA 43 standard 43, causing operational hazards
• Risk 2, Slackness in testing Blowout preventer
• Risk 3, Not enough pressure from accumulator unit
• After adding barriers, acceptable risks81
Before adding barriers After adding barriers
Risk 1 Risk 1
Risk 2 Risk 2
Risk 3 Risk 3
Findings of the research
• Dutch Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Association is working on a new version• Implementing “shall, should and could method”
• Shall, Means that such method or practice reflects a mandatory provision of law
• Should, Means that such method or practice reflects a Good Operating Practice
• Could, Means that such method or practice is of an advisory nature or mentioned by way of example
• Operating companies are not in one line with State Supervision of Mines
• Current legislation and Standard 43 are insufficient 82
Conclusion
• Current standard 43 needs improvements.
• Clarification is needed for a good collaboration between SodM and the operating companies
• Implement new layout
• “Shall, should and could” method
83
Recommendations
• Determine the ambiguities in the Dutch legislation and NOGEPA standard 43
• Share thoughts and information about operating safely with regard to the BOP.
• Use the “shall, should and could” build up in the new standard 43.
• Develop an application that contains legislation, API standard 53 and NOGEPA standard 43
• Don’t circulate below the lowest ram 84
“We can take the horse to the water,
but we can not make the horse drink”
- Jens Horbeek, 7 January 2016 -
85
Presentatie 6
Base Case Offshore Windfarm
Minor: Windenergie
Door
Vincent van der Kooi en Leon Mulder
Inhoudsopgave
• Achtergrond en opdracht
• Vooronderzoek
• Enquête
• Tool
• Response
• Eindconclusie en aanbevelingen
• Vragen
Achtergrond
• Topconsortium Kenniscentrum Wind op Zee
– Fase windpark
– Opleidingen
– Rijksoverheid doelstelling
Opdracht
• Beschrijving base case offshore windpark
– Fasen van een project offshore windpark
– Partijen/werkzaamheden/kwalificaties
– Aantallen medewerkers in diverse functies beschrijven
– Beschrijven van opleidingen van die medewerkers
Vooronderzoek
• Vincent:
– Onderzoekfase & Constructiefase
– Deskresearch
– Offshore energy 2015
• Leon:
– O&Mfase & Ontmantelingsfase
– Deskresearch
– Offshore energy 2015
Vooronderzoek
• Bestaande onderzoeken gevonden
• Vacaturen bekeken van onderhoudsmonteurs/installatie
monteurs/administratieve medewerkers
• TKI Windopzee Supplychain tool
• 4coffshore.com
– Alle offshore windparken
– Betrokken ondernemingen
– Betrokken logistiek
Enquête
Enquête
Tool
Tool
Tool
Tool
Tool
Tool
Response
Response Ingevuld
• Operations en Maintenance 3 1
• Construction 1 0
• Ontwikkelingsfase 0 0
Eindconclusie, aanbevelingen en
resultaten
• Resultaten
– Opzet onderzoeksrapport met aanbevelingen
– Fasen van een windpark uiteengezet
– Overzicht beschikbare opleidingen
Eindconclusie, aanbevelingen en
resultaten
Vragen?
Presentatie 7
Power-To-Gas
25-2-2016 106
Banaz Al Jaff
Alexander Tieman
Maziar Hosseini
Hassan Bakry
Jeroen Bogers
Minor Oil & Gas
2015-2016
OMRIN
• Waste Collection and
separation
• 172.000 Households
• 7.000 companies
• Energy
25-2-2016 107
Introduction• 3 Situation
• H2 injection into the
fermenter
25-2-2016108
The process at OMRIN
• Questions
• Yield
• Electrolyzer
• Problems
• Gas separation
25-2-2016109
Methanogens
• Biochemistry
4 H2 + CO2 CH4 + 2 H2O +131 kJ mol-1
25-2-2016110
Electrolyser
Splits water into H2 and O2
2 configurations
Uniform
Bipolar
25-2-2016111
Injection of Gas
Side Sparger
• Pros
• Easy to instal
• Good mixing
• Tested in industry
• Cons
• Dead zone
• Possible to clog
Bubbling sticks
• Pros
• No Dead zone
• Easy to mount
• Less lightly to clog
• Cons
• bending
• Presure
25-2-2016112
Methane Increase
• Maximum temperature
rise
• Temp rise of 0,11 °C
25-2-2016113
• With H2 injection
• Methane increase
60% 66%
• Carbon dioxide
Decrease
40% 32,4%
Separation of gasses
• Filtration
25-2-2016114
Cost-Benefit Analysis
25-2-2016115
• Methane
• € 481.600 annualy
• € 1.444.800 annualy with subsidy
biomethane
• Electrolyser
• 10 MWh (40,05 euros for 1 MWh)
• € 10.000.000
Risk analysis
• Risk
H2 under pressure
• Cause
Lack of Maintenance
• Event
Leakage
25-2-2016 116
Recommendations
• Sulphate seperation, in the reactor or after te
filtration step
• A pilot plant for testing hydrogen injection with
the side sparger method or the bubbling stick
method.
• Electricity is cheaper at night, so that is the
most efficient time to produce hydrogen.
25-2-2016117
25-2-2016118
Any questions
Presentatie 8
Digitizing archives to SAPBy: Jelle Dijkstra, Siebe Fennema, Richard Hamelijnck, Maureen Radstok, Bas Roosken
120
Table of contents
Introduction
The assignment
Results
Templates
QHSE
Recommendation
BIM (Building Information Management)
121
Introduction
• Background NAM plant Den Helder
• LoCal, HiCal and Nogat
• The assignment• Digitizing archive to SAP
122
Methods
• Interviews• Six employees
• Template
• Select key data from interviews
• Pumps and compressors
• Searching the archive
• Strategy
• Sap System123
Results
• Templates
• Ten templates for pumps
• Five templates for compressors
• QHSE
• Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
124
Template pump
125
• Pump information
• Type of seal
• Driver
• Pump curves
• Technical drawings
126
QHSE
Quality, Health, Safety and Environment
K-9100 LoCal compressor
• Risk assessment matrix
• Bowtie
127
Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
Risk assessment matrix without barriers
128
Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
Bowtie
129
Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
Bowtie
130
Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
Bowtie
131
Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
Bowtie
132
Wrong input data K-9100 compressor
Risk assessment matrix with barriers
133
Conclusion
• Templates
1. Ten different pumps;
2. Five different compressors;
3. One template for a valve
• QHSE
1. Risk assessment matrix
2. Bowtie
134
Recommendations
One system for all data:
• BIM (Building Information Model)
• Possibility to link with SAP
135
136
137
Questions?
138
Thanks!
To the NAM
And to you for your attention!
139
Presentatie 9
Reliability Centered MaintenanceI N AS S O C IATIO N W I TH V E C TO R M AI N TE N AN C E M AN AG E ME N T AN D N HL U N I V E R SITY O F AP P L IE D S C I E N CES
Barry Slort Merchant Navy School (Maritime Officer)Eren Uslu Mechanical EngineeringJordy D`hondt Mechanical EngineeringLonneke Weel Chemical EngineeringMartijn Looman Merchant Navy School (Maritime Officer)
Date: 28-01-2016
Table of Contents
• Introduction
• RCM Methodology
• Qualitative Analysis
• Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)
• Diesel Engine
• Generator
• Quantitative Analysis
• RCM Simulations
• Software
142
RCM Methodology
143
• RCM (Reliability Centered Maintenance)
• Qualitative analysis
• Quantative analysis
Qualitative analysis
• FMECA (Failure mode, effect and criticality analysis)
• 1. What are the functions and performance standards of the asset?
• 2. In what way can the asset fail to fulfil his function?
• 3. What causes each functional failure?
• 4. What happens when each failure occurs?
• 5. What are the consequences of each failure?
• 6. What should (or can) be done to prevent or predict the (unacceptable) failure?
• 7. What should be done if a suitable preventive task cannot be found?
144
Qualitative Analysis
• Two different assets:
- The diesel engine
- The generator
• Seven questions used for this analysis (FMECA)
• Data used of 18 different diesel engines.
• Time frame of 5 years (320,037 hours).
145
Qualitative AnalysisFailure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) DIESEL ENGINE
146
Sub systems
Asset Diesel engine
Fuelsystem
Lub. oilsystem
Coolingsystem
Scavenging air system
Exhaustgas
system
Startingsystem
Control and
monitoring
system
Maincompone
nts
1. Function (fuel system) Supply of diesel oil to the engine
2. Failure mode Restricted fuel supply
3. Cause Fuel injector failure
4. Consequence Decreasing RPM’s
5. Failure priority Cannot comply with demanded power
6. How to prevent this failure Exchanging of the injectors after certain running hours
7. What if there is no preventive task? Not applicable
Quantitative Analysis
• Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)
• Mean Repair Time (MRT)
• Mean Time To Restore (MTR)
147
RCM Simulations
RCM clogging of fuel filters
• MTBF: 3000 hours
• Cost per uptime €0,04
• Average availability 99,93%
148
Questions?
149
Presentatie 10
Project E-grid
Irfan Bontje
Rik Brouwer
Noud van Brummelen
Quincy Garia
151
INTRODUCTION
Minor wind energy
Minor Olie & Gas
152
INTRODUCTION
220 Kv connection to G17, L5, F17, F3 en haze
220 kV – 6 kV transformer
reactive power compensator
153
WHY?
Sell fuel gas instead of using it
Safety
Longer profitable exploration opportunity
Small future discoveries are faster profitable
BEMS
Decrease CO2 emissions
Abandonment postponed if platforms are used as substations
154
Alternating current Direct current
Distance 0-80 km 80+ km
Losses Higher Lower
Instalation costs Lower Higher
Compensation coils Essential DNA
Coverter DNA Essential
Cables costs Higher Lower
155
CABLE ON COMPENSATION COIL
Spreadsheet setup Different capacity’s
Different situations
Compensation coil
Cable behaviour
Price estimate Koper vs aluminium
Cable estimate
156
SPREADSHEET SETUP
compensatie op situatie
Configuration Gemini G17 F17 L5 F3 Hanze
1
2
3
4
5
cos phi=1
cos phi=0,52
cos phi=0,8
157
PRICE ESTIMATE
gas € 34.796.034,00per year
electricity € 46.394.712,00per year
Co2 rights € 1.667.533,01per year
Difference in power -€ 11.598.678,00per year
Sub total € 36.463.567,01per year
total € 24.864.889,01per year
158
€ 210.000.000,00
€ 230.000.000,00
€ 250.000.000,00
€ 270.000.000,00
€ 290.000.000,00
0 50 100 150 200 250
cost
pri
ce [€]
Power in [MW]
copper cable and compensation coil
1
2
3
4
5
€ 210.000.000,00
€ 230.000.000,00
€ 250.000.000,00
€ 270.000.000,00
€ 290.000.000,00
0 50 100 150 200 250
cost
pri
ce
Power in MW
Aluminium cable and componsation coil
1
2
3
4
5
LAW SURROUNDING THE NORTH SEAPOWER CABLE
-Wind Energy Law at Sea:
. Realization and exploitation
-generate more sustainable energy
-ensure a share of renewable sources by
atleast 14 percent in 2020
-To realise this law is essential
159
LAW AND REGULATIONS
(kavel besluit) decided where, which conditions built, exploited
Lot decision doesn’t give right to establish and exploit windfarms
-Electricity and Gas Law (Stroom wet)
Energy Agreement can’t be fulfilled without it
Old Gas and Electricy Law still applies.
160
HSE
161
GRID OPERATIONAL (MECHANICAL FORCES)
162
CONCLUSION
• A lot more details are needed.
• Recommendations Technical research
Economical research
Potential grants
Business continuity (decision making)
• First step to a brighter emission free future.
163
ANY QUESTIONS?
164
Maritime Campus Netherlands
www.maritimecampus.nl