Download - CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT
1
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT
Date(s)
Educational Program or SponsorFaculty
2.5 Day Toolbox
2
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PURPOSES OF COURTS
• To do individual justice in individual cases• To appear to do justice in individual cases• To provide a forum for the resolution of legal disputes• To protect citizens against arbitrary use of Government
power• To make a formal record of legal status• To deter criminal behavior• To help rehabilitate persons convicted of crimes• To separate persons convicted of serious offenses from
society
Time destroys the purposes of courts. The purpose underlying CFM is not faster and faster and more and more, it is justice. CFM is a justice not an efficiency driven activity.
3
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LOCAL LEGAL CULTURE INDEPENDENT DEPENDENT
Size of Court
Judges/Caseload Ratio
Trial/Settlement Practice
Calendaring SystemIndividual/Master
Civil/CriminalTIME TO DISPOSITION
Strength of Case ManagementCivil/Criminal
Changing ProcessIndictment/Information
Speedy Trial Rule
Source: Thomas Church et al, Justice Delayed, NCSC, 1978.
4
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Proven Case Management Principles And Practices
5
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THE COURT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING CASE PROGRESS.
SIN QUO NON
6
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
ABA STANDARDS RELATING TO COURT DELAY REDUCTION
Standard 2.50Case flow Management and Delay Reduction: General Principle
From the commencement of litigation to its resolution, whether by trial or settlement, any elapsed time other than reasonably required for pleadings, discovery, and court events, is unacceptable and should be eliminated. To enable just and efficient resolution of cases, the court, not the lawyers or litigants, should control the pace of litigation. A strong judicial commitment is essential to reducing delay and, once achieved, maintaining a current docket.
7
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THREE THINGS THAT COURTS MUST HAVE
• Leadership• Standards• Information Related to Standards
– Timely– Accurate– Clearly Presented– Used for Continuous Improvement
8
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
JUDICIAL COMMITMENT AND LEADERSHIP
• This is the key element• The chief judge sets the tone• Judges must:
– Manage judges– Be committed and show commitment– Involve other judges, other agencies, staff, court
administrators, and others– Establish courtwide policy– Establish partnership with court administrator
and the clerk
9
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CHARACTERISTICS OF SUCCESSFULLY MANAGED COURTS
• Accountability
• Persistence
• Willingness to initiate change
• Continuity – Pet projects do not survive
10
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
WHY MANY COURTS HAVE LEADERSHIP FAILURES
• Lack of leadership skills
• Lack of willingness to lead
• Frequent changes of leadership
11
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
STANDARDS
• For the system as a whole
• For parts of the system
• For individual cases
12
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
TYPES OF STANDARDS
• Filing to disposition all case types• Pending cases all case types
MACRO
MICRO• Time between events• Individual cases
RELATED GOALS• Continuances• Cases over standard
13
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Maryland Case flow Time StandardsCase Type Definition of Terms Time Standard Additional
MeasurementsCase Time Start Case Time Suspension Case Time Stop
Suspend Re-Start
Criminal First Appearance of defendant or entry of appearance by counsel (Rule 4-213)
Bench Warrant, Failure to Appear (FTA), Mistrial, NCR evaluation, petition for reverse waiver, competency evaluation, PSI ordered, pre-sentencing treatment program, interlocutory appeal
Reappearance, Retrial, determined to be criminally responsible, denial of reverse waiver, finding of competency, receipt of PSI, unsuccessful completion of pre-sentencing treatment program, appellate decision
Disposition · Verdict/PSI ordered · PBJ · Stet · NP · NG · Sentencing
6 months (98%)
1.Arrest/Service of Summons or Citation Date to Filing in Circuit Court2.Filing to First Appearance3.Verdict to Sentence Date
Civil Service on First Defendant or First Answer, whichever comes first
Bankruptcy Court stay, interlocutory appeal. Demand for arbitration, body attachment
Discharge of bankruptcy, reinstatement, appellate decision, reappearance
Disposition, Dismissal or Judgment, Court-ordered arbitration
18 months (98%)
Circuit Court Filing to Service or Answer, whichever comes first
Domestic Relations (Including Child Access)
Service on Defendant or First Answer, whichever comes first
Bankruptcy Court stay, interlocutory appeal, body attachment
Discharge of bankruptcy, appellate decision, reappearance
Disposition, Dismissal or Judgment
12 months (90%)24 months (98%)
Circuit Court Filing to Service or Answer, whichever comes first
14
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Maryland Case flow Time Standards(continued)
Case Type Definition of Terms Time Standard Additional Measurements
Case Time Start Case Time Suspension Case Time Stop
Suspend Re-Start
Juvenile Delinquency
First Appearance of respondent or entry of appearance by counsel
Bench Warrant, Failure to Appear, Mistrial, NCR evaluation, petition for waiver, competency evaluation, Pre-Disposition Investigation Report ordered, pre-disposition treatment program, interlocutory appeal
Reappearance, Retrial, determination of NCR, finding of competency, decision on waiver, receipt of Pre-Disposition Investigation Report, unsuccessful completion of pre-disposition treatment program, appellate decision
Disposition · Jurisdiction Waived · Dismissal · Stet · Probation · Facts Sustained · Facts Not Sustained · NP
90 days (98%) 1. Original Offense date to Filing2. Petition Filing date to first appearance
15
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
SAMPLE CASE-SPECIFIC TIME STANDARDS
Table 2AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION TIME STANDARDS*
Time Within Which Cases Should be Adjudicated or Otherwise Concluded
Case Type 90% 98% 100%
Civil 12 months 18 months 24 months
Criminal Felony 120 days 6 months 365 days
Criminal Misdemeanor
30 days --- 90 days
Domestic Relations 3 months 6 months 12 months
16
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
New Jersey Civil Time Standards
TrackTime Standard
Discovery
ACMS* Notice(Days before discovery ends)
Caveats
Track I 12 months 150 days 60 days Various
Track II 18 months 300 days 60 days Various
Track III
24 months 450 days 60 days Various
Track IV
24 months 450 days 60 daysManaging judge responsible
*ACMS is the automated case management system, which provides notices based on elapsed time in individual cases.
17
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
New Jersey Special Civil Time Standards
Case Type Time Standard Caveats
Auto Negligence 4 months Various
Contract 4 months Various
Small Claims 2 months Various
Tenancy 2 months Various
18
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
WHY STANDARDS ARE HELPFUL
• Promote Expedition and Timeliness• Motivation• Organize CFM software and MIS• Stimulate new programs and procedures• Internal and External Accountability:
cCourt systems, courts and their leaders, management, programs and individuals
19
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
INFORMATION
• Timely
• Accurate
• Clearly Presented
• Used for Continuous Improvement
20
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS: MONITORING LEVELS
Level IBasic Information
Level IBasic Information
Level IIFor Efficient Information
Level IIFor Efficient Information
Level IIIFor Top Management
Efficiency
Level IIIFor Top Management
Efficiency
21
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEVEL I
• How many cases are filed each year?
• How many cases are pending?
• How many cases are pending on each judge team and each judge’s docket?
• How old are the pending cases?
Questions you must be able to answer for basic CFM and docket management
22
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEVEL I(Continued)
• What is the status of each case? What was the last event? When did it occur? What is the next event? When is it scheduled?
• How many cases are disposed each year? How many cases do each judge dispose each year, month, week, and day?
• How do the cases reach disposition, i.e., how many by jury, bench trial, settlement/plea, dismissal, etc.?
• How old are the cases when they reach disposition?
23
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEVEL II
• How old are all pending cases and how old are cases at disposition? When do dispositions occur? How many cases settle on the day of trial? How many settle before a trial date is set? How many events are set? How many are held? How many events are adjourned/ continued/dismissed? What is the continuance rate for events other than trials? What is the trial rate? How many cases are scheduled for trial that never result in a trial?
24
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEVEL II(Continued)
• How many appearances are there per case?
• How many appearances per case would there be if continuances were eliminated?
25
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
COMPARISON:CASELOAD VS. WORKLOAD
130,000 120,000 110,000 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1985 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 Filings: _________________ Appearances: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
26
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
• How do the flow chart and the reverse telescope compare with court perceptions of the system?
• What are the trial probability rates for each type of case? • Is judge time being efficiently utilized?• What are the short- and long-term trends? Based on the
data, what problems can be anticipated? What steps can be taken now to avoid future problems?
LEVEL IIIQuestions you must be able to answer for top docket management efficiency
27
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
• What are system strengths and weaknesses? What can be done to improve the system?
• What is the source of docket problems? Which cases are getting old? Why? Who is responsible?
LEVEL III(Continued)
28
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
5% Trial2% Trial
CIVIL
REVERSE TELESCOPE
80% Answered
60% At Issue
45% to ADR35% Settlement Conference
15% Pretrial 5% Trial Starts
97% Arraignment80% First Appearance/Preliminary Hearing
60% Pretrial Conference/Motions Hearing50% Begin Trial
15% Pleas On Trial Setting(s)
CRIMINAL
Cases Filed 100%
10% Trial Starts
29
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THREE AXIOMS
1. Lawyers settle cases, not judges
2. Lawyers settle cases when prepared
3. Lawyers prepare for significant events
30
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
FIVE PRINCIPLES
1. Early control
2. Continuous control
3. On a short schedule
4. Be reasonably arbitrary
5. Create the expectation and reality that events happen when scheduled
31
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
GROUP EXERCISE: EARLY AND CONTINUOUS CONTROL
RULE 2.507
32
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CALENDARING SYSTEMS:THE BASICS
• Individual
• Master
• Team
• Hybrid
Types of Case Assignment Systems
33
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
INDIVIDUAL CALENDAR SYSTEM
Motions
PretrialConferences
Dispositions
Motions
PretrialConferences
Dispositions
Motions
PretrialConferences
Dispositions
Motions
PretrialConferences
Dispositions
Motions
PretrialConferences
Dispositions
Judge Judge Judge Judge Judge
Cases Filed
34
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
INDIVIDUAL CALENDAR ALLEGED STRENGTHS
• Autonomy and Responsibility
• Accountability
• Competition
• Motions Practice
• Continuity and Familiarity
• Eliminate Judge ShoppingSource: Maureen Solomon, Case flow Management in the Trial Court, ABA, 1973.
35
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
MASTER CALENDAR SYSTEM
Disposition
Judge Judge Judge Judge Judge
Cases Filed
Disposition Disposition Disposition Disposition
Master Calendar JudgePretrials
ArraignmentsMotions
Continuances
36
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
MASTER CALENDAR ALLEGED STRENGTHS
• Use of Time• Trial Date Certainty• Uniform Disposition Rates• Central Control• Team Spirit• Specialization• Pre Trial Continuity Court Wide• Less Expensive
Source: Maureen Solomon, Case flow Management in the Trial Court, ABA, 1973.
37
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Team Calendar System
Team 1
Team 2 Team 3
Assigned to Team
Cases Filed
Master Calendar Judge Master Arraignment(Rotating)
TrialJudge
TrialJudge
Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3
TrialJudge 3
TrialJudge 2
TrialJudge 1
38
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
TEAM CALENDAR STRENGTHS
• Same as Individual Calendar: Accountability, Consistency and Competition
• More Cooperation to achieve goals, shape the work so no courtrooms fall behind
• Reduce Judicial isolation• More willingness to attempt change; change is
less threatening, more shared risk• Everyone looking at the same problems, seeking
common solutions
39
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
WEAKNESSES
• Difficult to make groups function as teams
• Difficult system to maintain over time, keep the teams meeting and working as a team
• Difficult to recruit or appoint effective team leaders
40
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
HYBRID CALENDAR SYSTEM - 1
Motions Judge
Cases Filed
PRETRIAL EXAMINER
READY-FOR-TRIAL STATUS
Disposition Disposition Disposition Disposition Disposition
Motions Motions Motions Motions Motions
Pretrial Conference If
Not Held Earlier*
Pretrial Conference If
Not Held Earlier*
Pretrial Conference If
Not Held Earlier*
Pretrial Conference If
Not Held Earlier*
Pretrial Conference If
Not Held Earlier*
Motions Filed
Pretrial Conference Requested
Notice of Issue Filed
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
41
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
HYBRID CALENDAR SYSTEM - 2
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
Cases Filed
CENTRAL TRIAL POOL
Ready-for-Trial Status
Ready-for-Trial Status
Ready-for-Trial Status
Ready-for-Trial Status
Ready-for-Trial Status
Motions Motions Motions Motions
Pretrial Conference
Pretrial Conference
Pretrial Conference
Pretrial Conference
Trial Date
RandomAssignment
Assigned by Assignment
Office
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
To Judge
Disposition Disposition Disposition Disposition Disposition
Motions
Pretrial Conference
42
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
HYBRID CALENDAR STRENGTHS
• Allows judges and administrators to use the most effective and efficient calendar type for various types of cases
• Provides greatest flexibility. Can use different calendar types for difference DCM tracks
• Allows managers to take advantage of the strengths of individual judges
• Various parts of the system can be changed without changing the entire system
43
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
HYBRID CALENDAR WEAKNESSES
• More complex therefore more difficult to monitor
• Requires an effective automated information system because so much monitoring is required
44
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
COMMON ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS
• Collective Responsibility Court Control• Continuing Consultation• Standard Procedures• Restrictive Continuance Policy• Central Control and Coordination• Time Standards Filing to Disposition• Measurement of Performance• Change
Source: Maureen Solomon, Case flow Management in the Trial Court, ABA, 1973.
45
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELECTING A CASE ASSIGNMENT SYSTEM
• State mandates• Number of judges• Judges’ management skill levels and
personalities• Number and types of cases being managed• Degree of cooperation among judges• Preferences of most judges• Available and likely staff and information
resources
46
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
EARLY COURT INTERVENTION AND
EARLY DISPOSITIONS
TrialNon-trial
47
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CAMDEN CIVIL DISPOSITIONS
2%
Trial
All other Dispositions 98%
Dismissals 27%
Default & Summary Judgments 9%Other 10%
Settlements 52%
48
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
OUR MANTRA
THE SAME
OR BETTER
JUSTICE
SOONER
49
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
GUIDELINES FOR EARLYNON-TRIAL DISPOSITIONS
(THE OTHER 98%)
• Obtain dispositions before trial dates are scheduled
• Provide information necessary for lawyer preparation and all other decision makers to make decisions as early as possible
• Create an early disposition climate• Create special early disposition tracks and
programs for certain types of cases (DCM)
50
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CONTROLLING CONTINUANCES
No system will work if continuances are allowed.
51
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THE CONTINUANCE CONUNDRUM
When low on list attorneys may not
prepare case & have witness
present
Usually cases low on list are not
reached for trial
Court schedules unrealistically high number of cases
Too few ready cases to keep judges busy
Due to unreadinessAttorneys request
continuance
Court routinely grants continuance
Source: Maureen Solomon, Case flow Management in the Trial Court, ABA, 1973.
52
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
WORKLOAD EXPANSION DUE TO CONTINUANCES
Filings9,171
45,855 Appearancesif 5 per filing
9,622 Dispositions
119,223 Appearances if13 Appearancesper filing
53
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
IMPACT OF DECREASED APPEARANCES PER CASE
• Better use of judicial resources and time• Less work for court personnel• Reduced attorney load• Reduced litigant inconvenience• Reduced costs
119,223 Appearances @ 13 / case45,855 Appearances @ 5 / case73,368 Fewer Appearances Mean . . .
54
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
How to Multiply Your Workload
1stTRIAL DATE
2ndTRIAL DATE
3rdTRIAL DATE
THESE CONTINUANCES AFFECT … Files Prisoner TransportationComputer Entries Jail PopulationForms ProsecutorScheduling JudgeDefense Staff
55
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
REASONS WHY TRIALS DO NOT OCCUR ON SCHEDULED DATES
• Poorly trained attorneys• Too few early and too many late dispositions • Calendars overset and set too early • Poor use of DCM and ADR• Jury management problems• Parties not prepared
56
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
REASONS WHY TRIALS DO NOT OCCUR ON SCHEDULED DATES
(continued)
• Attorney conflicts• Adjournments• Cut-off dates for motions, evidentiary
hearings• Commitment to estimated trial length• Scheduling backup trials• Trial backup systems
57
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
MORE REASONS WHY TRIALS DO NOT OCCUR ON SCHEDULED
DATES
Is this for participants to make suggestions?
58
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
GUIDELINES FOR SETTING FIRM TRIAL DATES
• Schedule as few cases for trial as possibleGoal: Percentage of cases scheduled for trial not more than twice the actual trial rate.
• Set firm trial dates. Set Trial date when case is trial-ready after all pretrial matters have been resolved.Goal:15% continuances or less.
• Do it once• Consider every event a disposition opportunity
59
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
GUIDELINES FOR ACHIEVING FIRM TRIAL DATES
• Schedule as few trials as possible
• Schedule trials late in the process*
• Have backup systems
• Gather and review monitoring information
60
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CONTINUANCES AND TRIAL RESETS
• Sample jurisdiction
26,612 filings
532 trials• 26,612 x 3 people = 79,836 people
Continue once - 79,836 x 2 = 159,672
Continue twice - 79,836 x 3 = 239,503
Continue 3 times - 79,386 x 4 = 319,344• Trial - average appearances per case = 5
61
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CONTROLLING CONTINUANCES AND TRIAL RESETS
• Strict written court policy to limit continuances
• Track continuance rate to see if policy is enforced– Who continued– Reasons for continuance
62
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CONTINUANCES RULES
• Continuances breed continuances
If attorneys believe case will proceed as scheduled, they will prepare
Preparation minimizes the need for continuances
• Cannot establish trial date certainty if you allow continuances
63
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
TARGET CONTINUANCES RATE
Goal: Continuance rate of 15% or less per scheduled court event including trial settings
64
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PROVEN TECHNIQUES FOR BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES
• Court attention to cases at earliest possible moment• Early and continuous case control• Event deadlines• Restriction of continuances• Smaller trial calendars• Firm trial dates• Trial management• For all but the most complex court cases, do not
schedule trials until all other settlement options have been tried
65
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PROVEN TECHNIQUES SPECIFICALLY FORCIVIL CASES
• Control time from filing to service• Monitor receipt of answer or responsive pleading• Case differentiation for track assignment and
management• Early case scheduling conferences• Trial date selected after all settlement options
explored for all but the most complex cases (1-2% max)
66
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PROVEN TECHNIQUES SPECIFICALLY FOR CRIMINAL CASES
• Realistic Charging• More Dispositions at or before arraignment in
general jurisdiction court• DA, PD, Court Consultation on appropriate
processing track• Every event meaningful
67
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
• Early disposition of motions• Plea cut off dates• Trial dates scheduled only if needed, after all
settlement options explored
PROVEN TECHNIQUES SPECIFICALLY FOR CRIMINAL CASES
(continued)
68
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PROVEN TECHNIQUES FORMOTIVATING AND HELPING JUDGES
• Chief judge should serve as role model• Structure - policies, meetings, involvement• System climate• Provide good information• Use peer and system pressure
69
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PROVEN TECHNIQUES FORMOTIVATING AND HELPING JUDGES
• Provide orientation for new judges• Employ positive motivation• Include judges in staff meetings• Include lead and other staff in judge’s meetings• Do not waste time in meetings, provide staffing
and information• Build team approach - regular meetings• Hold meetings off-site
70
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
GROUP EXERCISE:
THE SAME OR BETTER JUSTICE SOONER: DESIGNING COURT INTERVENTION
71
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
MANAGING TRIAL TIME*
• 65-75% of a judge’s time is spent in trial• Trial time includes time scheduling, continuing,
and re-scheduling trials• Judge and courtroom based staff time is the
most expensive resource in the court (about $2,500 per day per courtroom)
• Trial time can be reduced by careful management
•All material adapted from Dale Sipes et al, On Trial: The Lengths of Criminal and Civil Trials, National Center for State Courts, 1989
72
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THE MATH
10 minutes per hour saved by each judge in trial4.5 hours per day on bench in trial on average40.5 minutes per day saved per judge8 judges324 minutes per day5.4 hours per dayEquals more than one new judge!
73
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PROFILE OF A TRIAL - 1
1. Selection of the jury in jury trials2. Plaintiff’s/prosecution’s opening statement3. Defense’s opening statement 4. Plaintiff’s/prosecution’s evidence5. Defense’s evidence6. Plaintiff’s/prosecution’s rebuttal7. Plaintiff’s/prosecution’s closing argument8. Defense’s closing argument9. Charge to the jury in jury trials10. Submission of case to judge in a bench or jury trial
74
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
MEAN LENGTH FOR ALL TRIALS*
• Civil Jury 13 hours 13 minutes• Criminal Jury 11 hours 7 minutes• Civil Non Jury 4 hours 54 minutes• Criminal Non Jury 3 hours 29 minutes• Plaintiff/prosecution from 2 to 2.7 times longer
than defense• Capital cases and jury deliberation excluded
75
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CIVIL JURY TRIALS
76
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CAN TRIAL LENGTH BE CONTROLLED?
Judges and attorneys overwhelmingly believe that trial length can and should be controlled
77
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
TECHNIQUES
• Prevent repetitive questioning
• Define areas of dispute before trial
• Set time limits during trial
78
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CONTROLLING TRIAL LENGTH • Pre-trial atmosphere• Trial continuity and length of trial day• Larger trials - more of everything• Examination of jurors• Witnesses• Exhibits• Length of testimony• Breaks• Interruptions
79
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LONG TRIALS
Long trials result when judges allow:
• More witnesses, exhibits, breaks, and interruptions• Loss of trial momentum• Trials and trial segments that go over breaks in morning,
afternoon, days, and weekends
80
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM PRINCIPLES
WHY NOT TREAT ALL CASES A LIKE?
• CASES ARE DIFFERENT• SOME CASES MAY BE SLOWED TO THE
PACE OF ALL,WHILE OTHERS ARE PUSHED MORE QUICKLY THAN JUSTICE REQUIRES
• CASES NEEDING A JUDGE’S MAY NOT GET IT, WHILE CASES NOT NEEDING IT MAY BE BROUGHT BEFORE A JUDGE
81
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM
Objective: • Same or better justice sooner• Eliminate waste and delay• Reduce costs time and otherwise
Definition: Determination of the appropriate level of court and attorneyattention that will move each case to disposition in a just and efficient manner
82
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM AS TRIAGECRIMINAL EXAMPLE
Band Aid Stitches X-Rays Surgery,Long hospital
Stay, ICU
Diversion
Probation
Motions, bench trial
Jury trial
Compare welfare fraud to first degree murder
83
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM ELEMENTS
• Early case screening for complexity based on established criteria
• Assignment to unique case tracks• Different procedures for each case track• Base assignment system on need by track
84
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BENEFITS OF DCM
• Optimum use of ADR• Attorney required to give early attention to cases• Potential for reduced motion practice• Facilitates accurate trial scheduling by reducing
the number of cases not reached on trial day
85
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THREE GENERIC CASE TRACKS
Basic/Expedited• Proceed to disposition w/ little or no court
oversight• Monitorable non labor intensive events• 20 – 25% of cases
86
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THREE GENERIC CASE TRACKS
Standard
• Contested issues with only modest need for court or judicial hearings
• 65 – 70 % of cases
87
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THREE GENERIC CASE TRACKS
Complex
• Continuous and extensive judicial and court oversight due to: – Seriousness, size and complexity of issues, – Visibility, identity and number of parties, and others
involved,– Difficulty or novelty of legal and factual issues
• 0 – 5% of cases
88
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CRITERIA FOR CLASSIFYING CASES AS:
BASIC/SIMPLE/EXPEDITED
STANDARD
COMPLEX
89
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM MODEL APPLICATION
OLD: Designed for complex cases; no firm trial dates; master calendar for 28 judges, minimal accountability, continuances freely given; usually set six trial dates then settle/disposed; no discovery or other cut offs; all cases given 2 – 5 years to ripen
90
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM MODEL APPLICATION
NEW: New cases assigned to 7 of 28 judges using individual calendar;Accurate count of active pending cases; old cases assigned to 21 judges with non complex cases assigned to efficient judge; take control of all other w/ special attention to backlog cases and scheduling orders for all cases, set time limits for response, expedite mediation, final settlement conference
91
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DCM MODEL APPLICATION
New Cases: 7 Judge Pilot w/ 4 Tracks:SHORT: 3 months discoveryREGULAR: 6 months discoveryLONG: 9 months discoveryEXCEPTION: Custom design for each case
Results
• Of all cases 60 months or older only 18 went to trial• Reduced pending caseload from 31,000 to 21,000 in three years• As current pending cases were reduced the 21 judges assigned to the
“day backward” calendar were assigned to the new “day forward” dockets and teams
• In three years there were only 3,200 cases over 2 years old
92
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
NEEDED CRIMINAL INFORMATION
• Bail recommendation• Sentence guideline score based on current
offense and criminal history• Urinalysis results• Addiction severity index result• Sanction guideline recommendation
93
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
GROUP EXERCISE: DCM
94
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
DEFININGANALYZING
ANDATTACKINGBACKLOG
ANDSTATISTICS
95
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CLEARANCE RATEFILINGS/DISPOSITIONS
DEFINITION OF BACKLOG
The backlog is the number of cases in the inventory that are older than the time standard set by the court.
96
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 1
Court A – CRIMINAL• Annual Filings: 9,171• Dispositions Last Year: 10,380• Current Pending: 4,780• Time Standard: 6 months• Cases over 1 year old: 2,480• Pending Goal
97
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THE MATH100 Filings
100 Pending CasesMedian Time to Disposition 12 months100% Case 24 months
50 Pending CasesMedian Case 6 months100 % Case 12 months
25 Pending CasesMedian Case 3 months
100 % Case 6 months
Pending Goal = Filings x .25 for each six months4 Month Time Standard Filings x ______2 month Time Standard Filings x ______
98
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 2
Court B – CRIMINAL
Annual Filings: 9,171
Dispositions Last Year: 8,048
Current Pending: 1,841
Time Standard: 6 months
Median age: 81 days
99
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 3
Court C – CRIMINAL
Annual Filings: 9,171
Dispositions Last Year: 12,590
Current Pending: 3,450
Time Standard: 6 monthsMedian age at disposition: 628 days
100
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 4
Court D – CRIMINAL
Annual Filings: 9,171
Dispositions Last Year: 9,180
Current Pending: 2,140
Time Standard: 6 months
Median age at disposition: 94 days
Median age pending 84 days
101
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 5
Court E – CIVIL
Annual Filings: 28,100
Terminations Last Year: 22,380
Current Pending: 42,740
Time Standard 98% in 18 months
Number of judges 20
102
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 6
Court F – CIVIL
Annual Filings: 8,254
Terminations Last Year: 8,221
Current Pending: 7,537
103
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 7
Court G – CIVIL TRACK I
Annual Filings: 4,058
Terminations Last Year: 3,823
Current Pending: 3,277
104
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 8
Court H – ALL TRACKS
Annual Filings: 98,675
Terminations Last Year: 108,533
Current Pending: 97,876
105
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 9
Court I – CIVIL TRACK II
Annual Filings: 4,734Terminations Last Year: 4,590Current Pending: 3,866Time Standard 100% 18 monthsBacklog 465
106
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 10
Court J – CIVIL TRACKS III and IV
Annual Filings: 563Terminations Last Year: 534Current Pending: 817Time Standard 100% 24 monthsBacklog 145
107
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 11
Court 11 – SPECIAL CIVIL AUTO AND CONTRACT
Annual Filings: 16,866Terminations Last Year: 15,750Current Pending: 2,574Time Standard 100% 4 monthsBacklog 80
108
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Court I2 – SPECIAL CIVIL SMALL CLAIMS and TENANCY
Annual Filings: 13,801Terminations Last Year: 13,702Current Pending: 921Time Standard 100% 2 monthsBacklog 11
BACKLOG ANALYSIS - 11
109
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
ATTACKING AN EXISTING BACKLOG -
Determine the active pending caseload• Administratively review all cases• Formally close “dead” cases• Announce the results
Determine status of remaining cases• Send notices and determine if still active• Case review by highly efficient judge
110
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
ATTACKING AN EXISTING BACKLOG - 2
• Formulate plan for remaining cases
– Settlement conference and early disposition– Deadlines and short schedules for intense judicial
attention– Mediation and arbitration– Extra resources for conducting trials in old cases– Other staff requirements– System for monitoring progress
• Implement effective docket management plan
111
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
SYSTEMS APPROACH AND VISION
• Case flow management is not just the court; it’s the whole system
• Everyone has to work together• Include all individuals and agencies involved• Obtain buy-in of all involved
112
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
SYSTEMS APPROACH
Techniques• Cooperation• Commitment• Feedback• Program modifications• Small, continuous improvements
Result• Maintain the docket without backlog
113
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
ANTICIPATORY CASEFLOW MANAGEMENT
• Develop a vision of the future• Develop a mission and goals statement• Establish objectives• Set performance targets and indicators• Formulate implementation plans and
strategies
114
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAMWORK
• No single person can make the system work
• One person can cause the system to fail
115
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
WHY A TEAM APPROACH IS MORE EFFICIENT
• More motivation
• More commitment
• Team can withstand more stress
• Team generates and sustains energy
• More excitement and enthusiasm
• Different perspectives in problem solving
116
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
COURT PURPOSES AND VISION
Court leaders must understand court purposes and promote vision and action throughout the court and justice community organized around the impact caseflow management has on justice. Acceptable court performance is impossible without effective caseflow management.
117
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
COURT PURPOSES AND VISION
Knowledge, Skills and AbilitiesA Knowledge of he Purposes and Responsibilities of the Courts
Curriculum Guidelines and how to apply them to caseflow management;
B Knowledge of the Trial Court Performance Standards, particularly the Expedition and Timeliness and Equality, Fairness, and Integrity Standards;
C Knowledge of the inherent powers of the court, which give courts the authority to set and enforce rules, including rules designed to improve case processing;
D Knowledge of the adversarial system and the values it supports;
E Knowledge of judicial and court manager ethics and their relevance to day-to-day caseflow management;
118
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
F Knowledge of the independent responsibilities of the three branches of government and how interactions among the branches impact funding of caseflow management, timely pretrial, trial, and post-disposition case processing, and the enforcement of court orders.
G Ability to conceive, build, communicate, and implement a clear vision and sense of purpose for the court and the justice system that incorporates caseflow and trial management;
H Skill in developing, communicating, and using caseflow and trial management goals that flow from a court- and justice system-wide vision and mission;
I Ability to translate vision into effective public communications, promotional material, procedural memoranda, and court rules to inform the public and the justice community about how caseflow management improves the quality of justice.
COURT PURPOSES AND VISION
119
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals include the relationship between the purposes of courts and effective caseflow and trial management, leadership, time standards, alternative case scheduling and assignment systems, and case management techniques, including differentiated case management (DCM) and alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
120
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (Fundamentals)
A Ability to link the broad purposes of courts to the goals of accessible, equal, fair, prompt, and economical resolution of disputes and effective caseflow and trial management;
B Knowledge of how the organization, jurisdiction, and funding of courts impact day-to-day caseflow management;
C Knowledge of how core management functions impact caseflow management including human resources, budget and finance, information technology, records, and facilities;
D Knowledge of case processing time standards and other caseflow management performance indicators;
E Skill in tying time standards to the number and types of cases that must be processed to meet time to disposition goals for all case types -- by year, month, week, day, and judicial division, team and judge;
F Knowledge of basic caseflow axioms and principles such as early and continuous judicial control and how they produce timely and fair dispositions through staff and lawyer preparation and meaningful events;
FUNDAMENTALS
121
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (Fundamentals)
G Knowledge of all case processing steps, sequences, and dynamics for all case types, including how lawyers, their clients, and pro se litigants make decisions concerning filing, case processing, and settlement; and the economics of the practice of law for criminal, civil, domestic relations, juvenile, traffic, administrative, and appellate cases;
H Knowledge of alternative case assignment and scheduling systems and how to set up and manage daily court calendars by judge, type of case and hearing, day of the week, and time of the day;
I Knowledge of differentiated case management (DCM) and its application to all case types;
J Knowledge of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and how to integrate ADR into the court’s case management system(s);
K Knowledge of psychological factors that impact case processing and scheduling, and active judicial management of pre-trial conferences, trials, and post-dispositional activity;
L Ability to learn from others CFM successes and failures, to keep current with research findings about effective CFM and the causes and cures for delay, and to leverage available external resources to improve caseflow management.
FUNDAMENTALS
122
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEADERSHIP TEAMS AND SYSTEM-WIDE EFFECTIVENESS
Court managers and the judge(s) in charge of the court (including the judges who head specialized court divisions) must work together to improve case processing and jointly lead the court and justice system. Understanding that while caseflow management requires early and continuous court control of individual cases, system-wide caseflow effectiveness is a cooperative effort of public and private litigants and lawyers, law enforcement, social services, health, detention and correctional organizations, and judges and court staff.
123
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEADERSHIP TEAMS AND SYSTEM-WIDE EFFECTIVENESS
Knowledge, Skills and AbilitiesA Ability to create and maintain a court executive leadership team that
effectively addresses caseflow management;
B Ability to develop effective CFM teams consisting of judges, court staff, and others throughout the court and the justice system;
C Knowledge of differing leadership styles and skills and how to build caseflow management executive teams around judges and court managers with diverse administrative experiences, interests, and capabilities;
D Knowledge of the agencies and individuals, both inside and outside the court, with whom the court must work successfully to bring about effective CFM and their independent CFM responsibilities and objectives;
124
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
LEADERSHIP TEAMS AND SYSTEM-WIDE EFFECTIVENESS
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
E Skill in establishing and maintaining effective working relationships and finding the right balance between oversight of others with independent case management responsibilities, delegating authority to them, and micro-management;
F Ability to help court officials and others understand their roles in the larger justice system and how they affect others, and to tie CFM to system-wide benefits, costs, and consequences;
G Skill and political acumen when working with funding authorities and the executive branch to improve case processing;
H Skill in allocating available resources and in preparing, presenting, lobbying, and negotiating realistic budgets to improve caseflow management;
I Knowledge of how to ensure the integrity of judicial orders, particularly processes that enhance revenue (fee and fine) collection;
J Ability to maintain effective partnerships among courts, the public and private bar, community groups, and the executive and legislative branches, without a loss of either the required tension between the branches or the adversarial system.
125
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CHANGE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Courts must skillfully and continuously evaluate caseflow with qualitative information and data and statistics, identify problems, and successfully build support for implementing and managing change.
126
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
A Ability to forecast and anticipate societal and justice system changes and trends that will impact filings and case processing;
B Knowledge of data needed for both continuous systemic evaluation and day-to-day caseflow management, and how to acquire and analyze needed data;
C Skill in using statistics and objective data as well as anecdotal information when assessing CFM, drawing appropriate conclusions, and differentiating between causes and effects when identifying and diagnosing CFM problems and challenges;
D Knowledge of basic strategic planning techniques including how to use statistics to draw appropriate conclusions about the current status and the future of the court’s caseflow and trial management system;
E Ability to use data to inform and, as appropriate, to influence judges and others about what is and is not working, and to persuade the bench, staff, and justice system partners, when appropriate, of the need to make changes and the feasibility of proposed solutions;
CHANGE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
127
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
CHANGE AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
F Skill in mediation, conflict resolution, and creative problem solving when addressing caseflow management challenges and needed change;
G Ability to stimulate action and funding support through appropriate comparisons and analyses, and to present data for maximum CFM impact, education, and information;
H Knowledge of the change process, how to plan change, and how to apply sound project management principles and techniques to caseflow management;
I Skill in managing CFM projects personally and through others, including those under and outside direct court control and supervision;
J Ability to conceptualize, to gain funding, and to oversee court construction, court renovation, and office and office furniture upgrades which enhance caseflow management;
K Skill in bringing about continuous evaluation with the understanding that caseflow problems are never solved once and for all.
128
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
TECHNOLOGY
Technology supports caseflow management through creation and maintenance of records concerning case processing and schedules, structuring management of pre-trial, trial, and post-dispositional events, conferences, and hearings; monitoring case progress; flagging cases for staff and judge attention; enabling verbatim records of court proceedings; and providing needed management information and statistics.
129
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
A Knowledge of the caseflow functions to which technology can be applied and which caseflow problems can and cannot be solved through technology;
B Ability to translate user information and experience into effective caseflow technology applications and systems and to prepare succinct and focused caseflow functional requirements;
C Knowledge of the case management functional standards being developed by the National Consortium on Court Automation Standards through NACM and the Conference of State Court Administrators;
D Ability to distinguish between fads and unstable hardware and software and reliable caseflow technology;
E Ability to lead technical people supporting caseflow management, whether in-house, central judicial (e.g., administrative office), executive branch, or outsourced and contractual;
F Ability to evaluate contractor responses to caseflow technology RFIs (Requests for Information) and RFPs (Requests for Proposals) and to get the right answers to the right questions before signing a contract;
G Knowledge of the uses and misuses of the Internet and web pages for caseflow management;
TECHNOLOGY
130
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
H Knowledge of telecommunication options and their practical impacts on caseflow management;
I Skill in conveying the reasons for changes and technical information to insiders and outsiders, including higher judicial authorities, funding authorities and those who actually process and manage cases;
J Knowledge of alternative methods to produce verbatim records of court hearings, and their potential to expedite trial and appellate processes;
K Knowledge of technology to store, index and access archival and active court records;
L Ability to convince funding authorities of the need for caseflow technology applications based on cost-benefit or other analysis, and to complete funded projects on time and within budget;
M Ability to stay current with the state of art and to update the court’s application of hardware and software, to caseflow management and to respect the fact that today’s technology innovation is inevitability tomorrow’s tired solution.
TECHNOLOGY
131
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
PERSONAL INTERVENTION
Court leaders need to personally intervene, communicate, and negotiate to bring about just and efficient case processing for all case types from filing to closure and court event to court event.
132
Case flow ManagementCase flow Management
National Association for Court Management
Knowledge, Skills and Abilities
A Ability to think strategically about caseflow challenges and to act proactively to address them by intervening at the right time with the right people;
B Ability to inspire the trust and cooperation that is absolutely necessary to improve caseflow management;
C Ability to assess the needs, demands, desires, skills, and performance of individual judges and to implement caseflow plans and programs that are understood and supported by the judges;
D Ability to model desired behaviors, particularly listening and teamwork with judges, court staff, and justice system caseflow partners;
E Ability to communicate CFM issues and goals clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing;
F Knowledge of the print and electronic media and what they need to cover court processes, cases, and decisions fairly and effectively without interfering with the process itself;
G Skill in gaining positive media coverage of exemplary CFM projects and achievements, and rewarding reporters for positive CFM coverage;
H Ability to make decisions, to act decisively, and to exert leadership with respect to caseflow management.
PERSONAL INTERVENTION