8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 1/21
fur trade legacy workshop 127
AbstractFeathers are amongst the most complex epidermal derivatives found in vertebrates.
They have complex branched structures, grow from their bases by a unique mecha-
nism, and come in a wide variety of sizes, shapes, structures, and colours. Not
only do feathers impart cover, insulation, waterproofing of the body, contribute to
flight, tactile sensations or protection of sensory organs, even storing water, they
are also involved in myriad aspects of communication and display in birds, and
characteristically rather ornately. Underlying this diversity of colours and patterns
found in birds is a variety of pigments (melanins, carotenoids, psittacofulvins, por-phyrins, etc.), pigment-bearing structures and molecules, and complex micro- and
macrostructures.
Given the great structural and functional diversity of feathers it should come as
no surprise that their conservation should require a multifaceted approach. Accord-
ingly, a brief review of feather anatomy, including the arrangement of feathers on
the skin (pterylosis), chemical composition, even the native fauna of feathers (e.g.,
lice, mites, bacteria)will be provided, emphasizing aspects of feathers that may be of
relevance to conservators.
Since cleaning methods are well covered by other speakers, my focus will be on
the preventive conservation of feather and fur colour from light. I will show howeven pigment systems that seem biochemically homogenous—like the melanins of
mammals—show surprisingly complex and species-specific responses to light. For
example, in pilot fading experiments, mink, but not marten, fur darkened initially
upon exposure to light. Attempts to quench free radicals likely generated by light
irradiation did not appear to slow fading down.
Considerations in the Conservation of Feathers and Hair, Particularly their Pigments
Jocelyn Hudon
Introduction
Feathers are among the most complex integumentary appendages foundin any vertebrate (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972). They have complex
branched structures, grow from their bases by a unique mechanism
(Prum and Brush, 2002), and come in an astonishing variety of shapes,
sizes, structures, and colours.Feather follicles can alternatively form feathers of different types in
each skin area in an arrangement that is precisely determined to form a
coherent plumage that conveys information about the bearer’s species,age, sex, and, sometimes, even condition.
From their humble origins as structures that probably functioned in
defence, thermal insulation or water repellency (Prum and Brush, 2002),
feathers diversified into structures that provided cover, permitted activeflight, carried tactile sensation, protected sensory organs, produced
sound, and, even, stored water. More importantly, feathers became highly
patterned and ornate, involved in myriad aspects of display and commu-nication in birds, a highly visual group of vertebrates.
Perhaps not surprisingly, feathers have been repeatedly borrowed as
ornaments by another highly visual species, Homo sapiens, in countlesscultural settings and periods, at times incorporated into headdresses, dia-dems, cloaks, capes, wristbands, earrings, and sceptres, even European
fashion, notably millinery. Feathers have also been used in the fletching
of arrows, bedding, ornamentation in millinery, as quill pens, powder-
puffs, even the making of artificial flies for fishing.Feathers still attached to skin, like whole birds, whole skins and parts
of skins and bird’s bodies, are also represented in various collections
(Rae and Wills, 2002). However, the use of bird skins for practical pur-poses is less common, being strongest in cultures that were more reliant
on birds for their survival, like people of the Arctic, where the skins of
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 2/21
128 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
marine birds were used to make parkas, overslippers, stockings, bonnets
and bags (Oakes and Riewe, 1996). In those instances where mammalian
skins were available, they were usually preferred as more durable (Raeand Wills, 2002).
For an exposition on the conservation of feathered skins, as opposed
to the feathers themselves, the reader is referred to Rae and Wills(2002). Feathered skins are also of course widespread in natural history
collections.
Although, in a museum context, attack by insects, deposition of dust
and soiling, and poor storage conditions are the most damaging to arti-facts incorporating feathers, these topics are largely covered by other
speakers. My focus here will be to provide information on the “natural
history” of feathers and on the effect of light of these brightly-colouredintegumentary derivatives.
Feather Composition
Like the epidermal appendages of other amniotes (reptiles, birds andmammals), feathers are composed mostly of keratin(s), an intermediate
filament protein produced by epidermal cells that forms a hard, flex-
ible, and insoluble polymer (Brush, 1978a). Unlike the α-keratins of the
epidermis and the hairs of mammals, which naturally form α-helices,the keratins of feathers, scutate scales, claws and beak, rather adopt a
beta-pleated sheet structure, where hydrogen bonds are formed betweenadjacent parallel or antiparallel polypeptide strands, yielding a markedly different high angle X-ray diffraction pattern (Brush, 1978a).
The feathers, scutate scales, claws and beak of birds (and a few reptiles)
are composed of a subclass of β-keratins that are referred to as feather
keratins, orφ-keratins (Brush, 1978a). The keratins of feathers are poly-peptides of about 100 amino acid residues (Presland et al., 1989a, 1989b;
Takahashi et al., 2003), with a molecular weight of approximately 10.4
kD [one Dalton (D) is the mass of an atom of hydrogen]. Avian scutatescales, beak, and claw are composed of another subclass of filament-
formingφ-keratins that are slightly larger (13.4 kD). Theα-keratins arecomparatively much larger at about 56.5 to 60 kD.
Feather keratins are relatively high in glycine, serine, proline, leucine,
and glutamic acid. Acidic amino acids exceed the basis residues, and the
overall pattern differs quantitatively from other fibrous proteins (Brush,1978a). When compared to mammalian hair keratins, feathers have
relatively lower methionine and lysine and a higher proline content
(Brush, 1978a).
Feather keratins are produced by several families of closely relatedgenes, occurring as tandem repeats throughout the bird genome. It has
been estimated that there may be as many as 100-240φ-keratin genes in
the chick genome alone (Kemp, 1975).
The flexural stiffness of the rachis does not appear to be controlledby the material properties of feather keratins, but rather by their cross-
sectional morphology (Bonser and Purslow, 1995). The X-ray diffraction
pattern of the intact feather calamus indicates a high degree of crystal-linity which can be deformed by stretching and is affected by heating in
water or aqueous butanol (Brush, 1978a). Crooks in feathers can usually
be removed with a stream of water vapour (steam).Much of the following information about types, structures and
arrangement of feathers—including several illustrations—is taken from
Lucas and Stettenheim (1972).
Pterylosis
In most birds, but excluding ratite birds (kiwis, cassowaries, emu, rheas,
and ostrich) and penguins, feathers are not distributed uniformly over a
bird’s body, but rather segregated into tracts or groups, interspersed withfeatherless spaces over the body (Fig. 1).
The areas covered by contour feathers, which are visible on the exter-
nal surface of the plumage, are called pterylae (Fig. 1). The areas of theskin without feathers, or with only down or semiplume feathers, are
called apteria.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 3/21
fur trade legacy workshop 129
Pterylography, or more commonly pterylosis, describes the pattern
of feather tracts (or feather follicles) in birds, while ptilosis is used to
describe the plumage associated with these follicles.
Moult
From the time a bird hatches until it becomes an adult, its featheringpasses through several changes in appearance. These changes are due
largely to a periodic replacement of feathers. In most birds, the shape of
each feather is established during its growth and does not change there-after except through wear. All feathers of fully-grown birds are replaced
at least once annually by moulting, in a stereotypical manner and
following a rather strict schedule of feather replacement, which may
vary from species to species, even populations of a single species. Thesingle generation of feathers that is brought in by each moult is known
as a plumage.
Feathers may change in appearance as they are replaced as a functionof the bird’s age, gender, and seasonal changes. In birds of temperate
locales, feathers grown in the Fall (the Basic plumage) may differ mark-
edly from those grown in the Spring (the Alternate plumage) just before
the breeding season.The quantity and quality of nutrition and other factors affecting the
health of a bird can affect the appearance of growing feathers, especially
the flight feathers. Malnutrition, for example, may result in the presenceof a series of V-shaped grooves across the vane. These grooves are causedby the poor development of the barbules and are known as growth bars
(Pyle, 1997).
Feather Structure
The main parts of a body contour feather, which form the outer cover of
feathers, are the shaft, the plates or vanes on either side of it and, in most birds, an aftershaft on the undersurface (Fig. 2).
Figure 1. Pterylosis of a male Single Comb White Leghorn Chicken.From Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 4/21
130 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
The shaft (or quill) is the longitudinal axis, and it is composed of two
segments, the barb-less calamus and the rachis. The calamus (or barrel)
is the short, unpigmented tubular base, largely implanted into the featherfollicle. It is approximately circular in cross-section and often tapered
toward the end. The rachis is the long, essentially solid portion of the
shaft above the skin.On each side of the shaft is a set of closely knit, fine branches that are
known individually as barbs and collectively as a vane. Proximally (closest
to the body) each vane is fluffy, while distally (away from the body) it is
firm and flat. The shaft serves as the scaffold, while the vanes provide thesurface for an airfoil or for covering and insulating the body.
The aftershaft is a structure attached to the underside of a feather at
the base of the feather, including featherlike structures composed of anaxis with barbs on each side.
Vane
The vane provides the surface for an airfoil or for covering and insulatingthe body. It consists of barbs (Fig. 2).
The vane of contour feathers varies in texture from base to tip as a
function of the structure of the barbs (and function of the feather). The
proximal portion of the vanes has a soft, loose, fluffy texture designated asplumulaceous or downy. This portion, concealed by other feathers, gives a
feather its property of insulation. The remaining portion of the vanes hasfirm, compact, closely knit texture designated pennaceous. It is a thin sheet of barbs that covers the body, and gives the feather its airfoil. The propor-
tion of downy and pennaceous texture varies and is one of the criteria for
defining certain types of feathers. Remiges and rectrices have entirely pen-
naceous vanes, whereas semiplumes are entirely plumulaceous.Barbs do not attach to opposite sides of the shaft at exactly the same
level, yet the total number of barbs is very nearly equal in both vanes. The
bare primary branch of barbs is called the ramus, the term barb beingreserved for the ramus and its vanules, the barbules on one side of a barb.
Figure 2. Main parts of a typical contour feather, exemplified by a
feather from the middle of the dorsal tract of a Single Comb WhiteLeghorn Chicken. From Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 5/21
fur trade legacy workshop 131
Figure 3 (above). Plumulaceous barbules of a Common Pigeon. From
Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972.
Figure 4 (right). Pennaceous barbules from the middle of a secondary remix of a Single Comb White Leghorn Chicken. Both have been turned
on their long axes so that they can be shown in side view. From Lucas
and Stettenheim, 1972.
Figure 5 (below). Segments of two pennaceous barbs from a contour
feather of a Single Comb White Leghorn Chicken, showing the inter-
locking mechanism. The barbs are seen obliquely from the distal endto show interlocking of parts. From Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 6/21
132 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
The ramus has the shape of a somewhat compressed filament that tapers
in height from base to tip. The branches of a barb are the barbules, also
known as radii.Plumulaceous barbules are characterized by a relatively short, strap-
like base and long, slender pennulum (Fig. 3). In spite of their simplicity,
plumulaceous barbules have distinctive characteristics in many orders orbirds, even lower taxonomic groups of birds, and are very useful to iden-
tify feathers.
Because plumulaceous barbules are less variable than those on the
pennaceous portion of a vane (particularly the barbules on the inner por-tion of the distal vanule of the basal barbs), they are very useful to identify
isolated feathers. Identification keys have been produced based strictly
on the characteristics of plumulaceous barbules [see Chandler (1916) andDay (1966)].
The dimensions of a feather (length, width, calamus length, downy
part, aftershaft length) as well as its curvature (including lateral cur-
vature) can assist identifying from which species of bird or tract they originated. A feather’s outer surface can always be told by the smooth side
of the shaft, which faces away from the body except in certain coverts on
the underside of the wings. One of the most distinctive features of a
feather is its coloration and patterning. Of course, this characteristic is of little utility when the feather is white or has been dyed.
Pennaceous barbules make up the flat, closely knit portions of the vanes. They are differentiated on both sides of a barb; even the ramusis asymmetrical (Fig. 4). The side of a ramus facing the distal end (tip)
of a feather is flatter than the side facing the proximal end (base),
and may even be concave (Fig. 5). Pennaceous barbs are held together by a
flexible, self-adjusting mechanism that is complex in details yet simple inessence. The distal barbules of one barb cross over the proximal barbules
of the next barb on the distal side. Hooklets of the former grasp the dor-
sal flanges of the latter, thereby interlocking them (Fig. 5). Dishevelled vanes with intact barbules can usually be straightened by running fingers
through the vane. One has to look no further for the origin of Velcro!
Feather Types
A single bird bears a wide variety of feathers, including (1) large, stiff
remiges and rectrices; (2) moderate-sized, partly-firm feathers that coverthe body (contour feathers); (3) small, fluffy down feathers; (4) hair-like
filoplumes; and (5) tiny bristles on the face.
Contour feathers
These are the main feathers on a bird’s body, which have already been de-
scribed above. Contour feathers are also known as pennae (singular: penna).
Remiges and rectrices
Remiges and rectrices are characterized by large size, stiffness, asym-
metry, vanes that are almost entirely pennaceous, and the absence of anaftershaft. Remiges and rectrices comprise most of the airfoil necessary for flying, often referred to as flight feathers.
Semiplumes
Semiplumes are sometimes combined with the downs, but they are
considered by Lucas and Stettenheim (1972) as a category between the
contour feathers and the downs, combining features of both rather
than any unique feature. Semiplumes have a long rachis (exceeding thelongest barbs) and have entirely plumulaceous vanes. Semiplumes are
distributed along the margins of tracts of contour feathers and in thetracts themselves.
Down feathers
There are two main categories of down feathers: natal down and definite
down. The natal down is present on a bird when it hatches or shortly afterward, while the definite down occurs in later generations of feath-
ers. Down feathers are wholly plumulaceous, the rachis being either
absent or relatively short. The texture of down feathers results primarily
from their slender flexible rami that bear long, segmented, filamentous
barbules without hooklets. Down feathers occur at various places on the
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 7/21
fur trade legacy workshop 133
body, as a function of the need for insulation. The patterns of distribution
of definite down feathers vary between groups of birds.
Powder down
Feathers of many birds are dusted with a very fine substance that resem-
bles talcum powder. Small amounts of this powder are shed by ordinary plumules and contour feathers. However, the powder is chiefly produced
by special feathers, the powder downs which are commonly dispersed
over the body among the ordinary downs and contour feathers. The pow-
der is composed entirely of keratin. The powder down is derived fromcells on the surface and in the middle of each of the many ridges of barb-
forming tissue within a feather germ, not normally incorporated in the
barbs but lost.
Bristles
Bristles are characterized by stiff, tapered rachis and the absence of barbs
except at the proximal end. They are virtually all found on the head.
Filoplumes
Filoplumes are hair-like, consisting of a very fine shaft with a tuft of
short barbs or barbules at its tip. Filoplumes do not have a tapered rachisand have barbs only at the tip when fully grown. They are always situ-
ated beside other feathers, and may serve as an indirect yet very sensitivemeans for recording slight movements of the larger feathers nearby.
Coloration
Birds show an exquisite variety of colours and patterns of coloration,
including many bold and showy ones. The patterns are often species-specific and may vary within a species with gender, age and season.
All colours are produced by one of two physical processes: the absorp-
tion of specific wavelengths of light by natural pigments (pigmentation),or the interference of light reflected by biological nanostructures of con-
trasting refractive indices (structural colours) (Frank, 1939).
Pigments
Biochemicals deposited in feathers during their elaboration are varied
and include melanins, carotenoids, psittacofulvins, porphyrins, and afew unknown pigments (Frank, 1939; Völker, 1944; Brush, 1978b). Col-
oration may also be acquired by grown feathers from the environment,
like ferrous oxides present in mud or sand. Finally, a wide variety of natu-
ral or artificial dyes may be applied by humans to light-coloured feathers.The emphasis here will be on pigments in native feathers.
Pigments (also called biochromes) differ in their chemical make-up,
absorption properties (colours), mode of formation, mode of incor-poration and display in feathers, as well as in their response to various
physico-chemical treatments.
Melanins
Melanins are the most common and widely distributed class of pigments
in bird feathers, and almost the only one in mammals. Melanins also
occur widely among plants, animals, fungi, and bacteria.Melanins give the feather a black, reddish-brown, brown or yel-
low colour (Frank, 1939; Lubnow, 1963; Brush, 1978b). Generally the
colours produced by melanins lack saturation (i.e., are relatively dull)
because most wavelengths of visible light are absorbed, at least to someextent. Still, when combined with other pigments or structural modifica-
tions melanins can create bright, even stunning colours (see StructuralColours below).
Melanin is a heterogenous polymer synthesized through the oxida-tion of the amino acid tyrosine by a process that is in part autocatalytic
involving free radicals, but initially requiring the enzymatic activity of the
copper-containing oxidase tyrosinase. Tyrosinase catalyzes the conver-sion of the amino acid tyrosine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (dopa),
then to dopaquinone, and so on (Brush, 1978b; Körner and Pawelek,
1982). Eumelanin is formed through subsequent intramolecular
rearrangements and polymerizations (Fig. 6). In the presence of sulfhy-
dryl compounds such as cysteine and glutathione there is production of
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 8/21
134 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
cysteinyldopas which oxidize, cyclize and polymerise to form another
type of melanin, phaeomelanin (Fig.6; Brush, 1978b). Most melanins are
insoluble and chemically intractable, though some are somewhat solublein alkali.
Melanin is synthesized in specific cytoplasmic organelles, known as
melanin granules, by specialized stellate pigment cells called melano-phores (melanocytes, when they lack organelle motility). Melanophores
do not develop in the growing feather per se, but rather lie at the base
of the growing feather (epithelial layer), actively producing and transfer-
ring melanin granules to the keratinocytes that will make up the featherproper. These pigment cells ultimately derive from neural crest cells that
form beside the neural tube early in development, which have migrated
to those parts of the body that are to be pigmented (Le Douarin, 1982).Melanin granules deposited on the surface of the keratinocytes enter the
deeper layers of the cytoplasm. With subsequent keratinization the pig-
ment granules become embedded in the horny substance of the epithelial
cells (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972).The colours produced by melanins depend on the type of melanin
involved, and secondarily on the number of granules laid down. Four
types of melanins are known in birds:
(1) the eumelanins produce black or dark brown; eumelanin granulesare typically rod-shaped (0.5-1.2 µm).
(2) the phaeomelanins produce light brown, reddish-brown, or yel-low granules. Granules of phaeomelanin are spheroid or ovoidand smaller than those of eumelanin, the smallest granules giving
rise to rusty-brown to pale yellow colours (Lucas and Stettenheim,
1972). Phaeomelanins differ in solubility, as well as spectrally and
chemically, from eumelanins (Lubnow, 1963). Unlike eumelanins,phaeomelanins are soluble in alkali and can be extracted with cold
0.25 % NaOH solution (Lubnow, 1963).
(3) An iron pigment closely related to, or possibly identical to, tri-chosiderin—the iron pigment of human red hair—has also been
Figure 6. Presumed pathways of melanin biosynthesis. From Brush,
1978b.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 9/21
fur trade legacy workshop 135
isolated from red, brown and buff feathers of chickens, turkeys,
junglefowl and Bobwhites (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972).
(4) Erythromelanins produce chestnut red, and have been hypoth-esized to occur in birds mainly on genetic grounds, but have never
been characterized adequately chemically.
Feathers, or parts of feathers, that contain melanin are usually moreresilient and less subject to wear than the unpigmented feathers or parts
of feathers (Burtt, 1986).
Carotenoids
Carotenoids are found in the feathers of birds from at least 10 orders (and
19 families) (Brush, 1981). Carotenoids produce most of the bright red,
orange and yellow hues of feathers, though not those seen in parrots, where psittacofulvins are involved instead (see below). When combined
with structural elements, especially blue, carotenoids also produce
shades of green.
Carotenoids are highly unsaturated hydrocarbons that are readily soluble in fats and organic solvents. For many years carotenoids were
labelled as lipochromes, a designation which no longer is desirable as
other groups of pigments (like the psittacofulvins) are also fat-soluble.
Birds, as all animals, cannot synthesize carotenoid pigments de novo and ultimately must obtain these pigments from their diet, directly or
indirectly from plants (Goodwin, 1984). However, many organisms, likebirds, can modify the ingested pigment to some extent (Goodwin, 1984).Both carotenes, made up of only carbon and hydrogen, and xantho-
phylls, which also contain oxygen, can be obtained in the diet, though
birds tend to absorb xanthophylls preferentially (one exception being the
flamingoes which absorb preferentially dietary carotenes) (Fox, 1976;Brush, 1981). Though carotenes turn up in feathers only rarely, they can
act as precursors of pigments that are deposited in feathers.
Several carotenoids have now been identified in the feathers of birds(Völker, 1944; Fox, 1976; Brush, 1981; Hudon, 1991). Feather colour usu-
ally correlates with the types of carotenoids deposited, particularly the
number of conjugated double bonds that they bear. It is not uncommon
for feathers to contain mixtures of several related carotenoids (Hudonand Brush, 1990; Hudon, 1991).
Feather carotenoids include:(1) dietary carotenoids: lutein, zeaxanthin, sometimes deposited
unaltered in feathers to produce orange-yellow to orange colours
(Fig. 7).
(2) red 4-oxo-carotenoids, produced through the enzymatic additionof one or two oxo (=O) functions at carbon 4 of the carotenoid
end-rings, extending the central chain of double bonds of dietary
carotenoids and shifting the colour toward red. Examples: astax-anthin, canthaxanthin, adonirubin, etc. (Fig.7).
(3) yellow carotene-3-ones produced through the migration of a
double bond on the carotenoid end-rings from position 5,6 to
4,5, shortening the chain of double bonds by one or two doublebonds yielding bright yellow pigments. Examples: canary xantho-
phylls (Fig.7; Goodwin, 1980; Hudon, 1991).
(4) light yellow picofulvins produced through hydrogenation of the
double bond 7,8 to produce 7,8-dihydro-carotenoids, in several woodpeckers (Stradi et al., 1998).
(5) an unusual, bright red, retrodehydro carotenoid, rhodoxanthin,presumed to be acquired directly from the diet, responsible forblue, violet and red feather colours in several fruit pigeons, and
dark red colours of cotingas (Völker, 1952, 1953).
During feather development the carotenoids are dissolved in lipoiddroplets. In the first stage of keratinisation the fat droplets disappear,
and the carotenoids are absorbed by the viscous keratin substance;
sometimes they are precipitated in the shape of fine particles which laterdissolve in the keratin (Desselberger, 1930).
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 10/21
136 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
The colorfastness of feather displays involving carotenoids varies
tremendously between taxa, from vanishing quickly after the death of
a bird, even in complete darkness [e.g., the pink or yellow blush, alsocalled flush, wash, tint, etc. of white feathers of several gulls, terns,
ducks, pelicans and ptarmigans (Stresemann, 1927; Höhn and Singer,
1980; Hudon and Brush, 1990)], to disappearing under filtered naturallight over a period of several months [e.g., the red feathers of Crested
Quetzal (Pharomachrus antisianus)], to being able to withstand display in
museum exhibits for extended periods of time, and retain their colour
almost indefinitely in darkness (e.g., Northern Cardinal, Cardinalis cardi-
nalis) (Völker, 1964).
Feathers containing carotenoids also differ markedly in the ease with
which they release their carotenoids to organic solvents, from being eas-ily washed away by organic solvents with little penetrating power, like
petroleum ethers, hexane, acetone (Hudon and Brush, 1990), to quickly
(in a few minutes) releasing them almost completely to a solution of
methanol at room temperature (Crested Quetzal), to even being resistant to organic solvents like methanol (most birds, including the Cardinal)
(Völker, 1964; Hudon and Brush, 1992).
Since the same carotenoids are involved in many of these examples,
the variation in colourfastness and binding strength must be related tothe strength and specificity of binding of the pigments to feather pro-
teins, and not to the nature of the carotenoids themselves (Völker, 1964):
it has been suggested that some blushes may be applied to the surface asa component of the preen gland secretion (Stegmann, 1954), while carot-
enoids in feathers may be bound more or less strongly and specifically to
feather proteins (Hudon, unpublished observation.).
Carotenoids in the Northern Cardinal (and the psittacofulvins of par-rots; see below) are bound to feather proteins of large size (> 200 kD)
different from feather keratins (Hudon, unpublished obs.). These pro-
teins alter the absorption properties of the pigments, shifting their peak of absorption to longer, less energetic wavelengths (which can be dem-
onstrated by heating the feathers in an oven), and dramatically extending
Figure 7. Examples of carotenoids found in the diet (top four) and feath-
ers of birds (all except β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin).
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 11/21
fur trade legacy workshop 137
the pigment’s stability and half-life, which would only be a few hours in
solution at room temperature (Hudon, unpublished obs.).
Traditionally, carotenoids in feathers have been extracted in strongbases like alkaline ethanol (e.g., 10% NaOH) over a steam bath, because
of the relative stability of most carotenoids in bases (though acido-
genic carotenoids, like astaxanthin, are often oxidized to respective acidderivatives in these conditions), but these methods lead to the complete
dissolution of the feather matrix. Extraction without feather destruction
is effected using acidified pyridine (Hudon and Brush, 1990), permitting
an examination of the remaining pigments (e.g., eumelanins), struc-tural colours and other morphological features. This method has proved
useful to remove pigments from fresh feathers (including those of par-
rots) to match badly faded ethnographic artifacts (Hudon, unpublishedobs.). Extraction with acidified pyridine also provides an easy and con-
venient means to determine whether carotenoids are involved (McGraw
et al., 2005).
Where carotenoid pigments are heavily concentrated, the ramus orrachis is frequently swollen, there is no differentiation into cortex and
pith, and the barbules are much reduced or altogether absent (Dessel-
berger, 1930).
Psittacofulvins
The bright red, orange, and yellow colours in the plumage of parrots are
produced by a class of pigment altogether different from carotenoids, which parrots also circulate in their blood, but seemingly do not use
for pigmentary purposes (McGraw and Nogare, 2004). Parrots instead
deposit psittacofulvins, until recently a structurally unelucidated fam-
ily of pigments (Völker, 1936, 1937; Hudon and Brush, 1992). Like thecarotenoids, the psittacofulvins are hydrophobic molecules. Unlike
carotenoids, however, they are synthesized endogenously by parrots and
do not appear first in lipoid droplets in growing feathers but are dis-solved directly in the keratinising cytoplasm of the cells (Völker, 1937;
Driesen, 1953).
Amerindians of the Amazon drainage and the Guianas apparently had
developed a means to reprogram the feather follicles of live parrots to
produce yellow or red feathers instead of the normal green ones by a pro-cess of “tapirage” which involved rubbing plucked areas of the skin with
a concoction containing the blood or skin toxin of Dendrobates tinctorius, a
member of the group of poison-arrow frogs (Métraux, 1944).Recently, the psittacofulvins found in the red feathers of the Scarlet
Macaw ( Ara macao) were chemically identified as consisting of four linear
polyenal structures:
tetradecahexenal, hexadecaheptenal, octadecaoctonal andeicosanonenal
CH3 - (CH + CH)n - CHO, where n varies from 6 to 9 (Stradi et al.,
2001).
Psittacofulvins can be extracted with acidified pyridine (Völker, 1936,
1937; Hudon and Brush, 1992). They change colour dramatically upon
initial exposure to this solvent, though the colour change is reversible if heating is not applied (Völker, 1937; Hudon, personal obs.).
It is not known how these pigments are synthesized by parrots.
Porphyrins
Unconjugated porphyrins are present in red and brown feathers of birds
from 13 orders, notably in the downy plumage and adult feathers of owls
and bustards (Völker, 1938; With, 1978). Porphyrins also occur in the hairof mammals.
Porphyrins characteristically produce an intense red fluorescence
under ultraviolet light.
Porphyrins are unstable and fade rapidly upon exposure to light, andthus tend to be restricted to those areas of the body protected from direct
sunlight (Völker, 1964; Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972).
Porphyrins are derived from the catabolism of the heme moiety of hemoglobin by the liver (which is another pigment used for the pigmen-
tation of the skin of birds, though not of their feathers) (Thiel, 1968).
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 12/21
138 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
Pigmentary porphyrins consist of four pyrrole rings united by methane
bridges into a super-ring. Feather porphyrins consist mainly in copro-
porphyrin III, but include also protoporphyrin IX and uroporphyrin I, which also appear in the eggshells of birds (Völker, 1938; With, 1978).
Members of the family of touracos (Musophagidae) deposit a unique
porphyrin, turacin, a copper-containing derivative of uroporphyrinIII, responsible for the rich red to purple-red colour of their remiges
and head feathers (Moreau, 1958; With, 1957). Turacin changes colour
(turns blue) upon exposure to rain, but reverses to its former colour
upon drying. Turacin is soluble in a weak alkaline solution and caneasily leach out of feathers. Considerable care should be taken when
washing these feathers to prevent leaching of the pigment. Yet turacin
is considerably more stable to light exposure than the free porphyrinsdiscussed above.
The green feathers of touracos and species from several orders of birds
[Blood Pheasant (Ithaginis cruentus), Roulroul (Rollulus roulroul), Jaçanas
( Jacana spp.), etc.] contain a porphyrin whose chemical relationship toturacin is not well understood, called turacoverdin (Dyck, 1992).
An unknown green pigment is found in the green feathers of eider
ducks (Somateria spp.) (Dyck, 1992; Hudon, unpublished obs.).
Adventitious coloration
Red and yellow colours in several species of waterfowl and some birds
of prey (e.g., the Bearded Vulture, Gypaetus barbatus) are the result of thedeposition of ferrous oxides picked up from the environment (mud,
sand) (Kennard, 1918; Höhn, 1955; Berthold, 1967). These colours are
relatively stable as they are an integral part of the plumage coloration.
The same could probably be said of pigments like ochre that are appliedby indigenous cultures.
Structural Colours
Structural colours in feathers are broadly classified as either iridescent
or non-iridescent, based on whether they change with the angle of view-
ing or illumination, or not. Until recently, these two classes of structural
colours were believed to arise from distinct physical processes, coherent
or incoherent scattering, respectively.In coherent scattering, colour production is described in terms of the
phase relationships among light waves scattered by multiple scatter-
ers, for example the interfaces afforded by rows of melanin granules ina keratinised matrix. Scattered waves that are out of phase destructively
interfere and cancel each other, whereas scattered waves that are in phase
constructively reinforce one another.
In incoherent scattering, in contrast, colour production arises as aresult of the differential scattering of wavelengths of light by the individ-
ual light-scattering elements, through Rayleigh scattering (erroneously
known as Tyndall scattering) or Mie scattering, with no relation to thephase relationships between the scattered waves.
It has become apparent in recent years that quasi-ordered arrays of
light-scattering elements in non-iridescent feathers also produce biologi-
cal structural colours through coherent scattering and interference (Dyck,1971, 1976; Prum et al., 1998, 1999; Osorio and Ham, 2002). The scatter-
ers are sufficiently spatially ordered at the nanoscale level to produce the
observed hues by coherent scattering but are not ordered enough at larger
spatial scales to be strongly or at all iridescent (Prum et al., 1998).
Iridescent colours
Iridescent colours are produced overwhelmingly in the barbules of feath-ers. Iridescent colours are always associated with melanin granules, the
granules being deposited in highly ordered layers parallel to the upper
surface of a barbule or one of its sections, keratin/melanin granule or
air-vacuoles in melanin granules affording interfaces of contrastingrefractive indices for reflection (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972).
The colour of the iridescence will vary as a function of the thickness of
the granules, intervening keratin layers, and/or air-filled cavities, numberof layers and spacing of light-scattering interfaces, as well as with the
angle of viewing and light incidence on the feather (Dyck, 1976).
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 13/21
fur trade legacy workshop 139
Figure 8. Coloured barbules in the pennaceous
part of a humeral feather from a Bronze Turkey.From Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 14/21
140 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
In some species, like the wild turkey, the pennula of iridescent bar-
bules become highly modified: broadened, flattened, and twisted so that
they lie in the plane of the vane (instead of perpendicular to it). As a result,
the vane presents a very smooth surface, not unlike a closed venetianblind (Fig. 8). Barbs in the iridescent zone contain such a large amount
of melanin that separate granules can no longer be made out (Lucas and
Stettenheim, 1972).In hummingbirds, the melanin granules instead contain gas-filled
air vacuoles in single or multiple layers, causing iridescence through
interference of light reflected from the upper and lower surfaces of the
vacuoles (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972; Dyck, 1976).
Non-iridescent Colours
Non-iridescent colours (most blues and violets, many greens) are pro-duced by modified rami or shafts, except in blue fruit pigeons ( Alectroenas
spp.), crowned pigeons (Goura
spp.) and a few other taxa, where they are
produced in the barbules (Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972; Dyck, 1976).In these systems the reflections responsible for colour-production
occur at keratin-air interfaces, in the spongy structure of large, polygo-
nal medullary cells of the barbs and shafts (Fig. 9). Electron microscopic
studies show the spongy structure to be a complicated network of inter-connected keratin rods of fairly constant diameter separated by air-filled
channels (Dyck, 1971, 1976), where colour is determined by the diame-
ters of the rods, which vary from 200 to 400 nm. Melanin granules, whenpresent, function primarily to absorb the transmitted light, not reflect
light as in iridescent colours (Dyck, 1976).
In white feathers, there is no underlying pigment and the rods of
keratin are of a larger diameter and reflect all wavelengths of light about equally. In structurally coloured rami, the cortex is unpigmented and
generally thin, usually referred to as cuticle. Combined with the presence
of yellow carotenoids or psittacofulvins the cortical layer will appeargreen (Fig. 9).
Figure 9. Rami that are coloured entirely or
partly by interference in cloudy cells. These
cells are shown in blue because they arethe source of this colour in whole feathers,
although they do not actually appear blue in
cross-section, i.e., without a background of
melanin.A and B, Green Magpie (Cissa chinensis),
head
feathers;
C, Vulturine Guineafowl ( Acryllium vulturi-
num) outer vane of remix;
D, Red-rumped Paradise Tanager ( Tangara
chilensis), abdominal feathers;E, Gouldian Finch (Poephilia gouldiae), dor-
sal feather;F, Masked Tanager ( Tangara nigrocincta ),
head feather. From Lucas and Stetten-heim, 1972; redrawn after Frank, 1939.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 15/21
fur trade legacy workshop 141
Feather Fauna
The feathers of live birds provide cover and food for a wide variety of
organisms, besides the clothes moths that are the bane of museum col-lections.
Chewing feather lice (Mallophaga)
Chewing feather lice are small (mostly less than 5 mm long) wingless,flattened insects, armed with chewing mandibles that are ectoparasites of
birds, feeding on the feathers (or hair) of their host. Chewing lice spend
their entire life on their host. Transmission from one host to another usu-ally occurs when hosts come in contact, since lice are unable to survive
long off a host. Each species attacks one or a few related species of hosts,
and lives on a particular part of a host’s body. Eggs are laid on the host,
usually attached to hair and feathers. Chewing lice can be quite irritatingto their hosts. Heavily infested animals are often emaciated (Borror and
Delong, 1989).
Mites
Mites are very small. Their small bodies allow them to exploit habitats
too cramped and food sources too meager for insects, and their life his-
tories are often many times more rapid. Not all bird-associated mites areparasitic; some may even be beneficial.
At least 2500 species of mites from 40 families are closely associated with birds, occupying all conceivable habitats on the bodies and nests of
their hosts (Proctor and Owens, 2000).Even taxa that lack feather mites, such as penguins, are attacked by
ticks. Feathers provide a habitat for the greatest diversity of bird-associ-
ated mites, some of which live on feather surfaces (plumicoles), whileothers live inside the quills (syringicoles) (Proctor and Owens, 2000).
Unlike feather lice, which consume feathers, plumicolous mites con-
sume mainly uropygial-gland oil (predominantly waxes and fatty acids)
and scurf, pollen and fungi that adhere to the feather barbs. The mites’
mouthparts are designed for scraping not chewing.
Bacteria
A soil bacterium, Bacillus licheniformis, was described recently as capable
of degrading feathers in poultry waste (Williams et al., 1990), and foundto be present in the plumage of many North American birds (Burtt and
Ichida, 1999).
Burtt and Ichida (2004) hypothesized that Gloger’s rule of ecogeo-graphic variation, whereby populations living in climates with high
relative humidity tend to be darker than those living in climates with low
relative humidity, might find an explanation in the increased resistance
to bacterial degradation of feathers laden with melanin pigmentation(Burtt, 1986).
However, even when applied liberally to the plumage of live birds
housed outdoors, even in humid conditions, B. licheniformis does not appear to degrade feathers (Cristol et al., 2005), raising the question as
to whether this and other keratin-degrading microbes have any effect on
the feathers of live birds.
Effect of Light on the Colour of Integumentary
Derivatives
There have been surprisingly few studies of the effect of light on the epi-
dermal appendages of wild species of vertebrates, e.g., range of naturalpigments and packages (scales, feathers, fur) (Cato et al., 2001), and
there are no published data about fading rates and acceptable exposure
levels for different types of feathers (Solajic et al., 2002).Moreover, studies carried out so far, and some currently in progress
at the British Museum, have been concerned mainly with the feathers of
parrots (Horie, 1990; Solajic et al., 2002), which contain an unusual suite
of pigments, the psittacofulvins, and so cannot be generalized to othermore common pigment systems, though they might be some of the most
susceptible to fading (Solajic et al., 2002).
Unfortunately, the small size of feathers, complex patterning and dif-ficulty to acquire large amounts of material greatly impede a systematic
study of the effect of light on a wide range of feathers. By contrast, furs
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 16/21
142 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
are often readily available and often of large enough size to allow for a
study, with controls and replicates. Moreover, furs also come in a vari-
ety of colours, including colour morphs or variants, which might permit
evaluation of the effect of pigment composition on rates of fading. Withthat in mind I set out to compare the effect of light on the fur of three spe-
cies of carnivorous mammals (the marten, mink and otter); specifically Iset out to:
1) gather quantitative data on rates of fading of furs known to be
sensitive to light in museum displays;
2) compare fading in species of different colours and mane structures;3) evaluate the remedial effects of an antioxidant (butylated hydroxy-
toluene) on fading.
Methods
Tanned skins of Mink (Mustela vison), Marten (Martes americana) and River
Otter (Lutra canadensis) were acquired from Halford Hide & Leather Co.
Ltd, Edmonton and cut into many 6.2 cm-long strips spanning the areabetween the dorsal and ventral midlines (except for the otter strips which
ran along the dorsal midline).
Strips that differed noticeably in appearance were set aside. The
remaining (similar) strips were drawn randomly and subjected to differ-ent treatments or used as controls. Most experiments were represented
by at least two strips, except for the methanol control, and the otter sam-
ples, where there was only one sample for each treatment.One set of samples was treated with an antioxidant, butylated hydroxy-
toluene (Sigma Chemical Co.; 1% in methanol), for 50 or 100 hours; a
control strip was bathed in methanol for 100 hours.
The fur strips were stapled on individual Atlas Electric Devices Fade-ometer test masks (No. SL-8A-3T) with a 6 cm x 6 cm window, ensuring
that the samples from a single skin visually matched in appearance (the
hair always pointed in the same direction). AATCC Blue Wool Light-fastness Standards (L2 to L7) were also mounted and run concurrently
to monitor light exposure levels. All samples were exposed to light in
an Atlas Weather-O-meter, Model Ci35 equipped with a continuous
water-cooled xenon-arc lamp shielded by a Soda Lime outer filter and
borosilicate inner filter (Option E in AATCC Test Method 16-1993; AATCCTechnical Manual, 1998).
Colorimetric and spectral readings were taken of all samples (N = 26)after 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 hours in the weatherometer. Colorimetric
determinations were made with a HunterLab ScanLab XE spectrocol-
orimeter (0°/45° geometry; 50 mm diameter aperture) connected to a
Dell Latitude C800 laptop (and driven by HunterLab Universal software v. 4.10). Each sample was read twice. An Ocean Optics USB2000 spectro-
photometer operated with OOIBase32 v. 2.0.1.4 was used to obtain visible
spectra of smaller areas of each sample (10.32 mm diameter) using a ISP-REF illuminated integrating sphere; sampling was done at the centre of
the plate, as well as at 15 mm above, below and to the left and right of the
centre. By the end of the experiment, 364 readings had been taken on the
colorimeter and more than 1092 spectra were acquired. Fading was esti-mated by determining ∆ECIELAB and ∆L* for CIELAB illuminant D65 and
10° observer data.
Results and Discussion
The three furs examined differed significantly in their reaction to expo-
sure to light in a fade-ometer. Both mink and otter fur darkened initially
(L* decreased) upon exposure to light, then slowly lightened. The martenfur, in contrast, lightened rather monotonously through that time inter-
val (Fig. 10). After 160 hours of light exposure in the fade-ometer, the
lightness of the mink fur, but not of the otter, had returned to near the
level when the experiment started. The otter fur gained only about half the lightness it had lost on initial exposure to light (Fig. 10).
The fur coloration also changed in a species-specific way, reddening
in the otter and mink, but initially becoming less red in the marten beforegetting redder as in the other species (Fig. 10).
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 17/21
fur trade legacy workshop 143
Figure 10. Fading rate curves for tanned marten, mink and otter fur (one
example each; colour and lightness variables are CIELAB units; error
bars are ±SD). Exposed to light in an Atlas Weather-O-meter, Model Ci35
equipped with a continuous water-cooled xenon-arc lamp shielded by aSoda Lime outer filter and borosilicate inner filter (Option E in AATCC
Test Method 16-1993; AATCC Technical Manual 1998).
Figure 11. Fading rate curves for otter fur with and without 1% BHT,an antioxidant (and methanol wash control). AFU’s are AATCC Fading
Units or hours of exposure calibrated using AATCC blue wool standards
(AATCC Technical Manual 1998).
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 18/21
144 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
Unfortunately, the species differ in hair length, pigment arrangement,
concentration and presumably composition; so the source of the species-
specificity of reaction to light cannot be completely ascertained.
In another experiment we tested whether scavenging free radicals,generated either directly from exposure to light, or indirectly from pho-
tochemical processes set afoot by light irradiation (Feller, 1994), usingan antioxidant (1% butylated hydroxytoluene), might impede or slow
down the photo-oxidation of pigments, particularly since melanins can
sometimes act as free radical traps (Geremia et al., 1984). Surprisingly,
however, addition of an anti-oxidant did not affect the direction nor therate of change of coloration, for example in the otter skin (Fig. 11).
In conclusion, conservators need to be aware that integumentary
colour systems, even those with only a single pigmentary or structuralsystem, may vary markedly in sensitivity and response to exposure to light
from one species to another. Future efforts should attempt to document
the effects of light on a wide variety of sources of colours and types of
feathers and to carry out controlled fading experiments on a wide variety of organic materials (feather, fur, scales, etc.).
Literature Cited
American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. (1998).
Colorfastness to light. Pp. 24-35 in: AATCC Technical Manual, Volume73. AATCC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Berthold, P. (1967). Über Haftfarben bei Vögeln: Rostfärbung durch
Eisenoxid beim Bartgeier (Gypaetus barbatus) und bei anderen Arten. Zoologisches Jahrbuch, Abteilung für Systematik 93: 507-595.
Bonser, R.H.C., and P.P. Purslow. (1995). The Young’s modulus of
feather keratin. J. Experimental Biology 198: 1029-1033.
Borror, D.J., and D.M. Delong. (1989). An introduction to the study
of insects. Sixth Edition. Saunders College Publishing.
Brush, A.H. (1978a). Feather keratins (Chapter 4). Pp. 117-139 in:
M. Florkin and B.T. Scheer (eds.), Chemical Zoology. Volume 10.
Aves. Academic Press, New York.
———. (1978b). Avian pigmentation (Chapter 5). Pp. 141-164 in:M. Florkin and B.T. Scheer (eds.), Chemical Zoology. Volume 10.
Aves. Academic Press, New York.———. (1981). Carotenoids in wild and captive birds. Pp. 539-562
in: J.C. Bauernfeind (ed.), Carotenoids as Colorants and Vitamin A
Precursors. Academic Press, New York.
Burtt, E.H., Jr. (1986). An analysis of physical, physiological and opticalaspects of avian coloration with emphasis on wood warblers. AOUOrnithological Monographs 38: 1-126.
———, and J.M. Ichida. (1999). Occurrence of feather-degrading bacilliin the plumage of birds. Auk 116: 364-372.
———, and J.M. Ichida. (2004). Gloger’s rule, feather-degrading bacte-
ria, and color variation among Song Sparrows. Condor 106: 681-686.
Cato, P.S., D.H. Dicus, and D. von Endt. (2001). Priorities for naturalhistory collections conservation research: results of a survey of the
SPNHC membership. Collection Forum 15: 1-25.
Chandler, A.C. (1916). A study of the structure of feathers, with refer-
ence to their taxonomic significance. Univ. California Publications
in Zoology 13: 243-446.
Cristol, D.A., J.L. Armstrong, J.M. Whitaker, and M.H. Forsyth. (2005).
Feather-degrading bacteria do not affect feathers on captive birds. Auk 122: 222-230.
Day, M.G. (1966). Identification of hair and feather remains in the gut
and faeces of stoats and weasels. J. Zoology 148: 201-217.
Desselberger, H. (1930). Ueber das Lipochrom der Vogelfeder. J. für Ornithologie 78: 328-376.
Driesen, H.H. (1953). Untersuchungen über die Einwanderung diffuser
Pigmente in die Federanlage, insbesondere beim Wellensittich(Melopsittacus undulatus [Shaw]). Zeitschrift für Zellforschung 39:
121-151.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 19/21
fur trade legacy workshop 145
Dyck, J. (1971). Structure and colour-production of the blue barbs of
Agapornis roseicollis and Cotinga maynana. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung
115: 17-29.
———. (1976). Structural colours. Pp. 426-437 in: Proceedings of the16th International Ornithological Congress. Australian Academy of
Science, Canberra City.———. (1992). Reflectance spectra of plumage areas colored by green
feather pigments. Auk 109: 293-301.
Frank, F. (1939). Die Färbung der Vogelfeder durch Pigment und
Struktur. J. für Ornithologie 87: 426-523.Feller, R.L. (1994). Accelerated Aging. Photochemical and Thermal
Aspects. Research in Conservation. Getty Conservation Institute.
Fox, D. (1976). Animal Biochromes and Structural Colours. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Geremia, E., C. Corsaro, R. Bonomo, R. Giardinelli, P. Pappalardo, A.
Vanelle and G. Sichel. (1984). Eumelanins as free radicals trap and
superoxide dismutase activities in amphibia. Comparative Biochemistry
and Physiology 79B: 67-19.
Goodwin, T. W. (1984). The Biochemistry of Carotenoids. Volume II.
Animals. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Höhn, E.O. (1955). Evidence of iron staining as the cause of rusty discol-oration of normally white feathers in anserine birds. Auk 72: 414.
———, and P. Singer. (1980). Über die Rostfärbung bei Schneehühnern. J. für Ornithologie 121: 282-286.
Horie, C.V. (1990). Fading of feathers by light. ICOM-CC 9 th Triennal
Meeting, 26-31 August, 1990, Dresden. pp. 431-435.
Hudon, J. (1991). Unusual carotenoid use by the Western Tanager
(Piranga ludoviciana) and its evolutionary implications. Canadian
J. Zoology 69: 2311-2320.
———, and Brush, A.H. (1990). Carotenoids produce flush in the
Elegant Tern plumage. Condor 92: 798-801.———, and Brush, A.H. (1992). Identification of carotenoid pigments
in birds. Methods in Enzymology 213: 312-321.
Kemp, D.J. (1975). Unique and repetitive sequences in multiple genes
for feather keratin. Nature 254: 573-577.
Kennard, F.H. (1918). Ferruginous stains on waterfowl. Auk 35: 123-132.
Körner, A., and J. Pawelek. (1982). Mammalian tyrosinase catalyzes threereactions in the biosynthesis of melanin. Science 217: 1163-1165.
Le Douarin, N. (1982). The Neural Crest . Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.
Lubnow, E. (1963). Melanine bei Vögeln und Säugetieren. J. für
Ornithologie 104: 69-81.
Lucas, A.M., and Stettenheim, P.R. (1972). Avian Anatomy.Integument. Agriculture Handbook 362. US Department of Agriculture,
Washington, D.C.
McGraw, K.J., J. Hudon, G.E. Hill and R.S. Parker. (2005). A simple andinexpensive chemical test for behavioural ecologists to determine the
presence of carotenoid pigments in animal tissues. Behavioural Ecology
and Sociobiology 57: 391-397.
McGraw, K.J., and M.C. Nogare. (2004). Carotenoid pigments andthe selectivity of psittacofulvin-based coloration systems in parrots.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 138B: 229-233.
Métraux, A. (1944). “Tapirage” a biological discovery of South American
Indians. Proc. Washington Academy of Science 34: 252-254.Moreau, R.E. (1958). Some aspects of the Musophagidae. Part 3. Ibis
100: 238-270.
Oakes, J., and R. Riewe. (1996). Our Boots: An Inuit Woman’s Art. Thamesand Hudson, London and New York.
Osorio, D., and A.D. Ham. (2002). Spectral reflectance and directional
properties of structural coloration in bird plumage. J. Experimental
Biology 205: 2017-2027.Presland, R.B., K. Gregg, P.L. Molloy, C.P. Morris, L.A. Crocker and
G.E. Rogers. (1989a). Avian keratin genes. I. A molecular analysis of
the structure and expression of a group of feather keratin genes. J. Molecular Biology 209: 549-559.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 20/21
146 cac / accr 31st annual conference, jasper 2005
Presland, R.B., L.A. Whitbread and G.E. Rogers. (1989b). Avian keratin
genes. II. Chromosomal arrangement and close linkage of three gene
families. J. Molecular Biology 209: 561-576.
Proctor, H., and I. Owens. (2000). Mites and birds: diversity, parasitismand coevolution. TREE 15: 358-364.
Prum, R.O., and A.H. Brush. (2002). The evolutionary origin and diver-sification of feathers. Quarterly Review of Biology 77: 261-295.
Prum, R.O., R.H. Torres, S. Williamson and J. Dyck. (1998). Coherent
light scattering by blue feather barbs. Nature 396: 28-29.
———, R.H. Torres, S. Williamson and J. Dyck. (1999). Two-dimensionalFourier analysis of the spongy medullary keratin of structurally
coloured feather barbs. Proc. Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological
Sciences 266:13-22.Pyle, P. (1997). Identification Guide to North American Birds. Part 1.
Columbidae to Ploceidae. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas, California.
Rae, A., and B. Wills. (2002). Love a duck: the conservation of feathered
skins. Pp. 43-61 in: M.M. Wright (ed.), The Conservation of Fur, Feather
and Skin. Archetype Publications Ltd., London.
Solajic, M.R., M. Cooper, T. Seddon, J. Ruppel, J. Ostapkowicz and T.
Parker. (2002). Colourful feathers. Pp. 69- 78 in: M.M. Wright (ed.), The Conservation of Fur, Feather and Skin . Archetype PublicationsLtd., London.
Stegmann, B. (1956). Über die Herkunft des flüchtigen rosenroten
Federpigments. J. für Ornithologie 97: 204-205.Stradi, R., J. Hudon, G. Celentano and E. Pini. (1998). Carotenoids in
bird plumage: the complement of yellow and red pigments in true
woodpeckers (Picinae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 120B:
223-230.Stradi, R., E. Pini, and G. Celentano. (2001). The chemical structure
of the pigments in Ara macao plumage. Comparative Biochemistry and
Physiology B 130: 57-63.
Stresemann, E. (1927-1934). Aves.–Vögel. in: W. Kükenthal and
T. Krumbach (eds.), Handbuch der Zoologie. Vol. 7. Part 2. Walter
de Gruyter, Berlin.
Takahashi, R., K. Akahane and K. Arai. (2003). Nucleotide sequences of pigeon feather keratin genes. DNA Sequence 14: 205-210.
Thiel, H. (1968). Die Porphyrine der Vogelfeder. Untersuchungen überihre Herkunft und Einlagerung. Zoologisches Jahrbuch, Abteilung für
Systematik . 95: 147-188.
Völker, O. (1936). Ueber den gelben Federfarbstoff des Wellensittichs
(Melopsittacus undulatus [Shaw]). J. für Ornithologie 84: 618-630.———. (1937). Ueber Fluoreszierende, gelbe Federpigmente bei
Papageien, eine neue Klasse von Federfarbstoffen. J. für Ornithologie
85: 136-146.———. (1938). Porphyrin in Vogelfedern. J. für Ornithologie 86: 436-456.
———. (1944). Die Stofflichen Grundlagen der Pigmentierung der
Vögel. Biologisches Zentralblat 64: 184-235.
———. (1952). Die Lipochrome in der Federn der Cotingiden. J. für
Ornithologie 93: 122-129.
———. (1953). Das Farbkleid der Flaumfußtauben (Ptilinopodinae). J. für Ornithologie 94: 263-273.
———. (1964). Federn, die am Licht ausbleichen. Natur und Museum 94: 10-14.
Williams, C.M., C.S. Richter, J.M. Mackenzie, Jr., and J.C.H. Shih.
(1990). Isolation, identification, and characterization of a feather-degrading bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56:
1509-1515.
With, T.K. (1957). Turacin is a copper compound of uroporphyrin III.Nature 179: 824.
———. (1978). On porphyrins in feathers of owls and bustards.International J. Biochemistry 9: 893-895.
8/3/2019 Consideraciones Sobre Conserv. de Pluma y Pelo
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/consideraciones-sobre-conserv-de-pluma-y-pelo 21/21
fur trade legacy workshop 147
AuthorJocelyn Hudon PhD
Curator of Ornithology Provincial Museum of Alberta
12845 – 102 Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta T5N 0M6
Tel: (780) 453-9179Fax: (780) 454-6629