27 – 38-27

: *

1 2

: 13/09/1393 : 19/01/1394

.

.

. .

.

. 4 ×5

. 42/64 % .

.

1. . 2 .

* .

– 9 1394 28 1 -

80 % 2000

4 % .

. 2 )Andrejko, 2008: 10.(

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

) ( ) ( .

. .

)Hasemi, Fayaz and Sarshar, 2010: 1824 .(

. 1903

70

. 1978 1 2 3 .

)Alessi, 2006: 6 .( 1980

)Zhou, Chen, 2010: 1322 .(

90

)Alessi, 2008: 6 .( 1998

. 4 .

1 : )Alessi,

2008: 6.(

29

) : (

.

.

.

.

. 4 ×5

3 .

.

42/64 %

. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

. 2-

.

.

.

.

. 2/0 2

.

.

.

.

. )Dickson, 2006: 8.(

– 9 1394 30

)( ) (

)( )( 2 : ( ( ( (

.

) 2 .(

3 -

.

.

. 4 -

.

. .

.

.

.

:

) . 1384: 120.(

) 1385: 170.(

.

.

.

) 1385 :102 .(

.

31

) : (

.

.

.

.

5 -

) 1389: 39 .(

. .

) 1390: 2 .(

. .

) (

. .

) 1387: 66 .( 1

. 2 .

1 :

2 : ) 1391: 59(

)m2(

)m2(

)m(

)w/m2c(

)w/m2c(

)w/m2c(

72/164 39/60 36% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 13% 64/241 34/77 32% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 9%

26/195 7/53 27% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 14%

1/104 95/21 21% 5/0 63/0- 58/1 - 5 8%

– 9 1394 32

1 2

.

.

.

.

.

. 3 3

.

3 : ) 1391: 59(

3 :

)m2(

)m2(

)w/m2c(

)w/m2c(

)m(

85/101 5/42 41% 63/2 - 8/5 2/0 45/68 83/26 39% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0 25/79 28/24 30% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0 54/61 08/19 31% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0 91/62 4/20 32% 77/2 - 8/5 2/0

2

w/m2c 58/1 63/2 77/2 .

.

w/m2c 5

w/m2c 8/58 .

.

.

.

33

) : (

.

.

.

.

.

. 4 .

)( )(

4 : ( (

.

. . .

.

. 5 6

.

5 : ) ( ) ( )

(

9 )(

9 )(

9 )(

– 9 1394 34

) ( ) ( ) ( 6 : ( ( ( )(

.

.

.

.

) ( ) ( .

) ( ) (

. 7 .

)( )( )( )( 7 : : ( ( : ( (

)(

7

.

.

.

.

. .

. . 8

)Gratia, De Herde, 2006: 200 .(

35

) : (

. )Alessi, 2008:

17 .(

.

.

.

.

. 9 .

8 : )Gratia, De Herde, 2006: 200(

)( )( 9 : )(

6 - ) (

.

4 5 3 .

30 . 70

. 90 210 .

6

. cm10 ) ( .

. cm 70

. .

. 10

.

– 9 1394 36

10 : ) ( ) (

.

. ) (

. . 4 .

4 :

Cooling set point

temperature

Heating set back

temperature

Heating set point

temperatureActivity(metabolic) Occupancy Activity

template

24c 12c 22c Light office work 0.1110 people/m2

Green office area

Zone multiplier

Summer clothing (clo)

Winter clothing (clo)

Office equipment(Gain)

Target luminance (lux)

Control type

Cooling set back

temperature 20.5 1.0015 w/m2300lux-liner 32c

Zone type Lighting control type

Lighting energy Lumiair type Fresh air (l/s-

person) Mech vent

cooling (o C) Cavity Liner 5 w/m2-100lux Suspended 10.000 24c

.

5 11 15 .

5 :

[kwh]

[kwh]

[kwh]

[kwh]

392/1896 986/57 128/700 506/2654 524/1806 630/20 759/761 912/2588

80/8 % .

.

.

.

42/64 % .

.

37

) : (

)(

)(

11 : - - - : ( (

)( )( 12 : : ( (

)( )( 13 : - - : (

(

)( )( 14: : ( (

)( )( 15 : : ( (

7 -

.

.

.

– 9 1394 38

.

. .

.

.

.

.

42/64 %

.

1. Canon 2. Hok 3. Hooker 4. Debis Tower

- Alessi B., (2008), Double Skin Façade & its benefits, Dissertation Report, Copenhagen Technical Academy. - Andrejko DA, (2008), Do not Harm: Preparing the Architecture Profession for the 21 Century, Oxford

Conference 2008, Oxford, UK. - Dickson A., (2006), Modeling Double Skin Façade, A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of msc Energy

Systems & the Environment, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow UK. - Gratia E, De Herde A., (2006), Greenhouse Effect in Double-Skin Façade, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 21, pp.

199-211. - Hashemi N, Fayaz R, Sarshar M., (2010), Thermal Behaviour of a Ventilated Double Skin Facade in Hot Arid

Climate, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42, pp. 1823-1832. - Juan ZH, Youming CH, (2010), A Review on Applying Ventilated Double-Skin Facade to Buildings in Hot-

Summer and Cold-Winter Zone in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, pp. 1321-1328.

- )1390( 3 . 10-1.

- )1391( 7 . 62-53.

- )1387( 18 19 . 64-66. - )1385( . - )1385( ) (

. - )1384( . - )1389( - :

130 . 49-38.