Download - Iravati Karve
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
1/58
The Draupadi debate: victim or feminist?
Irawati Karve's Yuganta
eople who tend to be easily offended (and to use this as an excuse for violence) continue to hyperventilate over
mythological holy cows. Yarlagadda Lakshmi Prasad's ahitya !kademi !ward"winning book Draupadihas
been the sub#ect of loud protests (and much shoe"throwing) because the writer allegedly depicted the
Pandavas' $ueen %in a highly ob#ectionable manner and used highly immoral words for her%.
&'ve been privately amusing myself by imagining how these offence"takers would respond to &ravati arve's
classic Yuganta which is one of the most renowned academic studies of the ahabharata and its characters.
arve who took a historical"cum"anthropological perspective on the great epic was dismissive of the idea that
*raupadi was a proto"feminist hakti+goddess figure , she saw her as being #ust as dependent and subservient
as any other woman in a strongly patriarchial society. -er analysis of the crucial episode where the humiliated
$ueen poses a $uestion of *harma to the elders in the aurava assembly is especially scathing she treats
*raupadi as a sort of pretender trying to speak with authority about things that she doesn't know enoughabout and suggests that %she should instead have cried out for decency and pity in the name of the shatriya
code%.
& don't agree with all of arve's assessments but the point is that here is a respected academic (and a woman
herself) engaging closely and intelligently with the text and treating its heroine as well as the other characters
as human beings with strengths and weaknesses. /hat's the best most rewarding approach to
theMahabharata which is first and foremost one of the world's most complex literary works. & wish more
people would appreciate this.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
2/58
Yuganta, by Irawati Karve - Reading The Mahabharata
This short and very readable book of essays on the Mahabharatawas recommended by rparvaaz,
who I believe has a copy for me. (Please e-mail me, and I'll send you my home address.) I read it
via inter-library loan, and am writin it up now as it's due today.
!arve was an anthropoloist, and enerally approaches the source with the concept that it
documents real people and events, but with an overlay of myth and many later and less-accurate
interpolations. (I say mostly because she doesn't entirely discount all of the mythic elements, like
"hishma's boon to live until he chooses to die.) #he likes the uncompromisin harshness of the story,
compared to later (soft and sentimental, in her opinion) stories like Shakuntala, and her readin is
often startlinly harsh itself. $nd very eye-openin. I can't even bein to count the number of times
when I thouht, %I never thouht of that& "ut it makes a lot of sense.%
$s I soon must leave to return the book, this will be more scattered notes than a real review. I'll take
her essays in order.
%The inal ffort.% This is about "hishma, and is full of surprisin (to me, anyway) interpretations.
#he suests that he became trapped in his role as dispassionate uardian, and so could not stir
himself to actually affect events, and that he chose yasa to father children on $mbika and $mbalika
because yasa would do it, then take off, whereas a youner man with a position at court miht ain
power and threaten "hishma.
!arve calculates his ae at the start of the war to be *+-++& Personally, I think that sort of
calculation is bound to be misleadin with a tet that old and that has had so many additions over so
lon, and it makes more sense to estimate people's aes based on what they're actually doin in the
tet and how people react to them. (#he does this in other essays too, such as claimin that !arnamust have been in his mid-twenties when he first challened the teenae $runa, and so he was
bein a bully. I think that even if mathematically that's true, the story never says anythin about it
and instead indicates that they're evenly matched, so it makes more sense to take that as the case.)
It makes more sense to me to think of "hishma as bein in his sities or early seventies-- old, but
still stron and hale. /o way can a ninety-year-old fiht for ten days in a war.
$nyway, she uses this to suest that 0uryodhana only asked him to be eneral as a formality and
courtesy, and was shocked when he accepted. $nd then "hishma kicked out !arna and didn't fiht
very hard in the hope of stoppin the war... with the conse1uence that everyone ot so annoyed with
him that they miht not have tried too hard to protect him in the end. 2h, and she says that
Parasurama was an interpolation, and the oriinal "hishma was no reat shakes as a warrior. I don'tknow that I buy this, but it's interestin to think about.
%3andhari.% 4er life sucked.
%!unti.% 4er life sucked too.
!arve suests that 0urvasa fathered !arna, and the story about the earrins and armor arose from
him havin been abandoned with old to pay for his care. If that was riht, would that mean he
really was a suta, and ineliible for the throne5 "ut !arve later says that idura (a suta) miht have
been 6udhisthira's bioloical father, which I think also makes him a suta. 0oesn't the father have to
be a kshatriya (or a 3od) to make the child of royal birth5 idura was ineliible for the throne
http://rparvaaz.livejournal.com/http://rparvaaz.livejournal.com/ -
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
3/58
because his mother was a maid. "ut yasa was... what, eactly5
I am now totally confused about the lealities of what each parent must be under what circumstance
for their child to be a possibility to inherit the throne. ($nd !arna was iven a kindom, so that's a
possibility too. 7ould idura have ruled 4astinapur if Pandu and 0hritarashtra had both died without
producin heirs5)
!arve theori8es that Pandu was impotent, not cursed, and went to the forest so no one would know
who fathered his children. ("ut I thouht it was leal for someone else to father children on a wife
with the husband's permission, so I'm not sure why that was necessary.)
%ather and #on5% This makes a plausible case for idura bein 6udhisthira9s bio-dad. idura was
supposed to be the incarnation of 6ama, plus there was that weird thin where he lay down on top of
6udhisthira when he was dyin. There's also a nice discussion of sutas in this essay.
%0raupadi.% $ really harsh analysis of her behavior durin the strippin, sayin that she was stupid to
make a leal arument and instead should have thrown herself upon everyone's mercy as a helpless
violated woman. I really don't aree that that would have made the slihtest bit of difference. Plus,however useless it was in such a patriarchal time, I am a person of my time and as such, I think
0raupadi was awesome and had ten times the uts and interity of anyone else there at the time.
There's also a comparison of the ideali8ed #ita with the realistic 0raupadi, and an adorable bit of
0raupadi:"hima fantasy at the end.
%The Palace of ;aya.% This interprets the forest fire at !handavaprastha as the Pandavas attemptin
enocide aainst the /aas, whom !arve suests were tribal people with animal clan names. 6ikes&
I have to say, after all the Pandava haioraphy one comes across, I cracked up when she compared
them to 4itler.
%Paradharmo "hayavaha.% $n analysis of the role of 0rona and $swatthama in terms of how they did
and did not behave as "rahmins.
%!arna.% $ain with the dissin of my favorite characters& #he also says that his relationship with
0uryodhana was one of retainer and patron, not true friendship, as proved by !arna only marryin a
suta and not a !aurava woman. or one thin, my recollection is that the only !aurava woman was
0ussala, and she was taken. Plus, I can't disreard the many times the two of them are weepin in
each other's arms, swearin eternal loyalty, and ust hanin out toether. It seems much more like
the !rishna-$runa relationship to me. Thouh I do aree that !arna was certainly not considered an
e1ual by anyone else, ecept perhaps !rishna.
%!rishna asudeva.% This talks about !rishna's oal of becomin a asudeva, which is apparently a
title and role that can only be borne by one man at a time. (I had assumed it was a patronymic, from
his father asudev.) acinatin stuff. !arve takes the position that !rishna was a brilliant man and a
reat politician, and was only thouht to be a 3od after his death. $s I mentioned in an earlier post,
it eplains the bi8arre massacre of the 6adavas story as a manled account of how the 6adavas ot in
a drunken brawl and were then attacked by enemies wieldin iron-tipped reeds, and that !rishna
chose to fiht to the death rather than be for protection from others (such as the Pandavas.)
%The nd of a 6ua.% This discusses the values and social conditions of the time, and how later Indian
literature displays chanin values.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
4/58
The whole inheritance thin is confusin me, too. I am also reminded of the yptian throne, where
the kinship passed throuh the woman. ypt was not matrilineal in the strict sense, but it was the
royal blood of the woman that authori8ed the kin to rule. 7hich is why the first thin a pharaoh did
when he ained the throne was to find himself a woman with somesort of royal blood to marry, to
leitimi8e his claim. #he miht be the dauhter or widow of the previous pharaoh, or, if he was of
royal blood himself, she miht be his sister or aunt. $t least with the Pandavas, where the fathers
were all different but the mothers were married into the royal family, that sounds vauely similar.
=oincidentally, my Ihopeful>)
2ooh, oooh, so many comments. !arna... unny because the adult challenin a teenaer thin at
the weapons contest was always how I imained that in my mind. I mean, I always ust assumed
that 0rona would want to show off $runa sooner rather than later (while he's still a teenaeheartthrob), and, knowin the chronoloy of the story, well, !arna would haveto have been
somewhat older than $runa at the time. I can't recall ever readin a version that specified their aes
at the time (or was it buried somewhere in the 3anuli mess5), but in my head, that's always how it
was. "ut I never saw it as !arna bullyin $runa because of his ae. /or did anyone else actually
present at the contest. It seemed like of all the issues brouht up in the weapons contest, ae is the
one issue that everyone inored, because it had no bearin on anythin.
And then Bhishma kicked out Karna
I always thouht it was !arna who threw the temper tantrum and refused to fiht if "hisma was on
the field5 2h these many confusin versions.
!o "a# can a ninet#$#ear$old fight for ten da#s in a "ar
6ou never met my reat randmother.
%&ather and Son'% This makes a lausible case for idura being Yudhisthira*s bio$dad idura "as
suosed to be the incarnation of Yama+ lus there "as that "eird thing "here he la# do"n on to of
Yudhisthira "hen he "as d#ing There,s also a nice discussion of sutas in this essa#
I still think that my favorite cracktastic interpretation of idura is the one where he's a futureincarnation of 6udhisthira born in 6udhisthira's past.
2n a more plausible level, but kind of on a tanent, I always kind of bouht the theory that idura
fell in love with !unti at some point. "ut he never touched her, of course. "ecause he's idura and he
doesn't roll like that. $lthouh I thouht that under some circumstances, it was all riht for a man to
accept his brother's widow as his wife5
%-rauadi% A reall# harsh anal#sis of her behavior during the striing+ sa#ing that she "as stuid
to make a legal argument and instead should have thro"n herself uon ever#one,s merc# as a
helless violated "oman . reall# don,t agree that that "ould have made the slightest bit of
difference /lus+ ho"ever useless it "as in such a atriarchal time+ . am a erson of m# time and assuch+ . think -rauadi "as a"esome and had ten times the guts and integrit# of an#one else there
at the time
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
5/58
?uoted for truth.
Karna... Funny because the adult challenging a teenager thing at the weapons contest was always how I
imagined that in my mind. I mean, I always just assumed that Drona would want to show off Arjuna
sooner rather than later (while he's still a teenage heartthrob, and, !nowing the chronology of the story,
well, Karna would ha"e to ha"e been somewhat older than Arjuna at the time.
Yeah, I had pictured him about five years older. I don't know what the difference is canonically and like I
said, I don't really trust a!e"calculations# but I think if $arna was better than %r&una because he was older
and so physically stron!er, that would have been stated.
I always thought it was Karna who threw the temper tantrum and refused to fight if #hisma was on the
field$ %h these many confusing "ersions.
Yeah, I've heard it both ways too. If the latter, it reminds me of %chilles sulkin! in his tent.
I still thin! that my fa"orite crac!tastic interpretation of &idura is the one where he's a future incarnation
of udhisthira born in udhisthira's past.
That is awesome. here did you come across that?
$s for the 6udhisthira@idura thin... It was a lon time ao, when I was searchin on the web for
information about reincarnation. I came across an article written by someone... I want to say that it
was on one of the maor websites like 4indunet or somethin, but I have no bookmark, and my
memory is fu88y. $nyway, the uy was eplainin that reincarnation doesn't happen in linear time,and that a %future% reincarnation of someone could actually be born in the chronoloical past. $nd
then he casually mentioned 6udhisthira and idura as an eample. $s in, by the way, idura was a
future reincarnation of 6udhisthira even thouh he was born before 6udhisthiraA and then he meres
with 6udhisthira at tne end. 2r somethin. It was a very casual mention, but I still remember it very
clearly because I remember thinkin, %That's pretty awesome.%
%Karna% Again "ith the dissing of m# favorite characters0 She(.ravati Karve) also sa#s that his
relationshi "ith -ur#odhana "as one of retainer and atron+ not true friendshi
I've seen this arument used by authors who obviously really like !arna but really despise
0uryodhana. #o they rewrite !arna so that he never really %liked% 0uryodhana, or they enerally try
to distance him as far from 0uryodhana as possible. 0inkar's The Sun 1harioteeris the most blatant
eample of this that I can think of off the top of my head.
Beardless of what the motivation or reasonin behind it is, inorin the !arna:0uryodhana
relationship strips away a ood chunk of what makes the ;ahabharata interestin and morally
comple, in my opinion.
I'm assumin that this is the one that also said that 6uddhisthira's father was probably idura,
udin by the practice of niyoa. ;ade sense to me, I mean, I wouldn't procreate with 0hritarashtra
if you paid me a million dollars. idura, on the other hand, had his head screwed on riht.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
6/58
I hated the part about 0raupadi deservin what she ot since she defended herself, and didn't play
the part of a damsel in distress. Perhaps it's ust me, but I think it would be hihly out of character
for a woman born out of fire to be meek.
This reminds me, I have to re-read this. I forot how wonderfully entertainin it can be.
ahem. bhishma did not choose vyasa. satyavati did.
drona was CD at the time of the war *clearly mentioned in tet), and bhishma wsa drona's
contemporary.
duryodhana asked bhishma not 1uite as a formality. he reckoned the pandavas would fiht a little
less valiantly if they saw randad out there. worked fine for aruna, didn't it5
durvasa as karna's father, vidura as yudhishtira's... i've heard these before. but vyasa doesn't strike
me as a person who would shrink from recordin a scandal in the family, heh heh.
vidura was sierd by a brahmin upon a sudra woman, which makes him not a suta, but a paarasava.
totally ineliible. however, caste then depended not ust on birth, but also on upbrinin. so, a born
kshatriya (e.. karna) brouht up as a suta, would remain a suta unless somethin drastic happened(as in the case of krishna - born a kshatriya, brouht up as a opa - which is a vaishya subcaste -
made to wear the mantle of a kshatriya aain).
that fatherin children bit was absolutely leal.
vidura did not lay down on top of yudhishthira... humph. he entered yudi in spirit. no physical contact
is mentioned. he walked away from yudi when yudi tried to touch his feet.
drona and aswatthama5 didn't she analy8e the un-kshatriya characteristics of vishwamitra (he was a
kshatriya, then decided to become a brahmin by penance), or come to that yudhishthira5
vaasudeva is indeed a patronymic. however, you may be iven the name vaasudeva, even if you are
not the son of vasudeva. there was another kin who wanted to be known as vaasudeva as well
(takin the meanin 'lord of the world'), and declared that he was the rtue vaasudeva and krishna a
pretender. hence the battle between him and krishna.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
7/58
Bhishma and Iravati Karves Yuganta
It was only recently that I had the pleasure of reading Iravati Karves tour de force Yuganta,
which I found one of the most brilliant and original studies of the Mahabharata. The rst
essay in the study is on hishma, and in it she tal!s about the futility of the grandsires longlife that spans several generations.
Karve begins the essay by summarising the plot, leading up to hishma bringing home
young "atyavati and presenting her to his old father as his new wife. #ere the scholarly
author ma!es a brilliant comparison of hishmas sacrice for the sa!e of his father
"hantanu with that of his ancestor $urus for the sa!e of his father Yayati and then as!s
what hishma gained by the sacrice in contrast to his ancestor who got his fathers
!ingdom overriding the rights of his elder brothers.
%hen you thin! of it, the sacrices are stri!ingly similar. To begin with, both fathers are old
and both sons young & hishma is perhaps twenty years old when he ma!es his sacrice
and $uru, though we do not !now his e'act age, is the youngest of his fathers sons, all of
them in their youth. In both cases, the sacrice is made by the sons so that their aged
fathers can en(oy sensual, and more specically se'ual, pleasures. In $urus case what he
sacrices is his youth, whereas in hishmas case, it is more than his youth that he
sacrices) he sacrices right to the throne, his whole life, and more.
y ta!ing the vow of urdhvaretatva, celibacy, he puts an end to his pra(atantu & his family
line. Indian culture sees few other sins as greater than that of brea!ing the pra(atantu. In
the famous convocation address in the Taittiriya *panishad, when the *panishadic guru
gives his parting advice to his disciple, the very rst duty he en(oins upon the student after
giving guruda!shina is to see that he does not brea! the family line) ach+ry+ya priyam
dhanam +hrtya pra(+tantum m+ vyavacchetsh.
The Mahabharata itself and the $uranas tell us stories of men whose austerities turned voidbecause they did not full this duty en(oined on them. It is the Mahabharata itself that tells
us the story of the ascetic -arat!aru who was turned bac! from his ascetic life and as!ed to
turn to family life in order to save his ancestors & -arat!aru subseuently begets /sita, who
stops -anama(ayas sarpasatra through which the !ing was trying to e'terminate the 0agas.
The $adma $urana tells us the story of Mahasati "u!ala, whose husband Kri!ala was
similarly turned bac! from the ascetic life and as!ed to go bac! to family life by his
ancestors.
$itr1rna, debt to the manes, is one of the basic debts that each man is born with according
to the ancient Indian tradition. /part from re(ecting the se'ual urge and its e'pression for
himself along with the pleasures and privileges of family life, what hishma did by ta!ing his
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
8/58
vow to remain an urdhvareta, was to fail in this regard. hishma had grown up fully aware of
the tradition that said when a man failed to produce a son, his manes fell from their world.
2oming bac! to Iravati Karves uestion, in contrast to $uru who gains a !ingdom and
becomes the vamsha1vardha!a, the progenitor of the race, what does hishma gain by the
great sacrice he ma!es3 True, the gods shower 4owers upon him at the moment of his vow.True, the world calls him hishma from that moment on. ut apart from that3 The answer is)
futility, emptiness, frustration and lifelong su5ering.
%ell, he did get one solid thing from his father, points out Karve) icchamrtyu, the power to
choose the time of his death. #owever, the author claries this) what he wins in return for
his sacrice is avadhyata, not a(eyata & he cannot be !illed by others, but it does not mean
that he cannot be defeated. /nd avadhyata can be a curse at times, and it mostly is)
through that privilege hishma lost the blessing of being !illed on the spot in a battle, which
privilege all !shatriyas had.
Karve observes that perhaps hishma got carried away by his own oath as a man who falls
into a mighty river gets carried away helplessly by its torrent.
#ow true Karves observation is proved by words in which he refuses "atyavatis subseuent
reuest to brea! his vows, occupy the throne of #astinapura, and marry and beget children.
"atyavati ma!es that reuest because his vows had by then become meaningless. #is vowswere ta!en so that "atyavatis children could inherit the harata throne, but her husband
and children were now dead and the harata throne itself had become without a master.
This is what hishma says in answer to the reuest of his widowed step mother)
6I shall give up the three worlds, I shall give up the empire of the gods, and if there is
anything greater than these, I shall give up that too & but I will not give up my truth. The
ve elements may give up their nature, earth the fragrance it e'udes, water the taste it
brings, light the forms it reveals, air the sense of touch and space its capacity for sound. The
sun may give up its splendour, the moon its coolness, Indra his valour and the lord of(ustice, (ustice itself & but I will not give up my truth. 7et the world end in dissolution, let
everything go up in 4ames & but I shall not give up my truth. Immortality holds no
temptations for me, nor does overlordship of the three worlds.8
True, one should !eep ones vows. ut at what cost3 /nd when they have become totally
meaningless3 %hen !eeping the vow defeats the very purpose for which it is ta!en rather
than brea!ing it3 /nd when the person for whose sa!e you too! that vow reuests it3
Iravati Karve is absolutely right in arguing that hishma is li!e a man fallen into a river. /s I
observe elsewhere 9Krishna) / "tudy in Transformational 7eadership &
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
9/58
http)::www.bolo(i.com:#induism:; hishma becomes obsessed with his vows and
gets helplessly carried away by them. #e becomes narcissistic and lives trapped in his own
self1image. In Karves words, he has become into'icated with his vow, drun! on it.
The essay also uestions the sincerity of hishmas commitment to the throne of
#astinapura because of which he stood by it through thic! and thin, eventually leading itsarmy against the $andavas whom he believed to be virtuous, competent and the rightful
heirs to the throne of #astinapura. "he uses hishmas refusal to brea! his vow and occupy
the throne and beget children to uestion the sincerity of his commitment. If he had such
intense love for the family of the Kurus, she as!s, why did he not brea! his vows and accept
"atyavatis reuest3
Karve sees a dual purpose in hishmas immediate acceptance of the position of the
commander1in1chief of the Kaurava army when ?uryodhana reuests him & that is, a dual
purpose apart from his possible desire to lead such a mighty army as that of ?uryodhana.@ne, to !eep Karna away from ?uryodhanas side, which hishma !new he would so long as
he was ghting, and thus wea!en ?uryodhanaA and two, to persuade ?uryodhana to give
the war even at that stage by frustrating his victory through dilly1dallying, which, through an
analysis of the battle of the rst ten days, the author argues he did.
@B@
%hile Karves essay on hishma is brilliant on the whole, there are details and observations
she ma!es with which one has to disagree, some of minor importance and others uite
signicant.
Cor instance, spea!ing of Dyasas niyoga with the wives of Dichitravirya, the author refers to
the third ueen learning that Dyasa 9Ea terrifying brahmana> is going to come to her and
sending her maid to him. /s we all !now, there is no third ueen & there are only /mbi!a
and /mbali!a. /nd the Mahabharata is uite specic about who was as!ed to receive the
sage again in her bed after /mbali!a gave birth to $andu) /mbi!a, the elder of the twoueens & (yeshFh+m vadhGm.
Karve tal!s of hishma getting Kunti to wed $andu, sort of against her will. The e'pression
she uses in the #indi version is Egale b+ndh diya, clearly meaning it was not according to
her wish. "he then argues that this was an in(ustice done to Kunti because $andu was
incapable of intimacy with women. "he as!s how much her soul must have cursed hishma
for this.
The facts are however di5erent. Though there is a discussion between hishma and Didura
in which hishma tal!s of getting Kunti as a wife for $andu, the Mahabharata tells us that it
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
10/58
is in a swayamvara that she chooses him from an assembly of several princes, all on her
own accord, and impressed by him. The critical edition is brief here, though that too says
she chose him in the swayamvara)
rGpasattvagunopet+ dharm+r+m+ mah+vrat+
duhit+ !untibho(asya !rte pitr+ svayamvare
simhadamshtram ga(as!andham rshabh+!sham mah+balam
bhGmip+lasahasr+n+m madhye p+ndum avindata
$andu, according to the critical edition verse uoted above, is elephant1shouldered, has the
eyes of a bull, and is mighty powerful. 9/ slight aside) The critical edition, praising $andu
here, says he had the fangs of a lion & simhadamshtra. Dery unli!ely. /nother case of the
critical edition getting it wrong. The Hita $ress edition has it right) simhadarpa & with thepride of a lion. ven the e'pression ga(as!andha, elephant1shouldered, is strained. The Hita
$resss mahoras!a in its place is beautiful> /nd Kunti wins 9chooses> him from among
thousands of !ings in her swayamvara.
The Hita $ress edition of the epic describes the swayamvara in greater detail. It describes
how she sees him, the best of the haratas 9bharatasattamam> in the assembly of princes,
loo!ing li!e a tiger among !ings 9r+(ash+rdGla>, with the pride of a lion, a powerful chest
9mahoras!a>, the 9into'icated> eyes of a bull and mighty strong. 7i!e the sun that eclipses
all other celestial luminaries when it rises, he eclipsed all other !ings with his glory. "eated
in the assembly, he loo!s li!e a second Indra and seeing him, Kunti, every limb of hers
tormented by longing 9!+mapart+ngi>, loses all control over her mind 9prachalam+nas+> and
her heart becomes wildly disconcerted 9hrdayena +!ul+>. That is how she chooses $andu
from among the men in the assembly. Karves saying that hishma forced her upon $andu
9against her wish>, thus earning her hearts curses, does not agree with the reality of the
epic at all.
/lso, Karve implies that hishma !new $andu was impotent when he got Kunti and Madrimarried to him. The epic states, though, that $andu receives the curse that ma!es him
impotent while he was living in the (ungle with his two wives. #e had left his !ingdom to his
brother ?hritarashtra, for whatever reasons, and had gone to live in the (ungle and it is
there that he comes across sage Kindama having se' in the form of a deer and !ills him
while the sage is in the middle of the act and receives his curse that he cannot have se'
with his wife and if he did, he would die.
In an article of mine 9The $uJJle of $anduA http)::bolo(i.com:hinduism:;;.htm> I have
argued that $andus impotency is unli!ely to be the result of the curse but is psychologicaland has much earlier origins. #owever, in all probability, hishma had no clue of this and to
imply that he got two wives for $andu in spite of !nowing he was impotent is denitely
wrong.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
11/58
@B@
Karve argues that people of hishmas day did not approve his action of carrying away the
three Kashi princesses, /mba, /mbi!a and /mbali!a, from their swayamvara hall. "he sites"hishupalas words in the La(asooya hall as a proof for this. %ell, when "hishupala abuses
hishme in the La(asooya hall, he is fuming in hatred at hishma and Krishna and if we ta!e
his words to be true or representative of the general feeling of the people, both Krishna and
hishma would me the most hated people of the age. The fact is (ust the reverse. /nd
denitely so in the case of hishma & even when Krishna was controversial, hishma
commanded universal respect in his age.
/s for carrying the princesses away from their swayamvara, this was a perfectly respectable
custom among the !shatriyas of the day. %e must remember here that hishma does not(ust come there, snatch them and run away. #e stands there and e'plains precisely what he
is going to do and challenges the assembled princesses to stop him if they can. /s /mba
says later after she was re(ected by "halva, her swayamvara was not an ordinary one but
one that reuired the suitor to prove his valour and claim her and her sisters & they were
viryashul!as, their Ebride price was valour. /nd as hishma himself e'plains in the assembly
of !ings, of the eight types of marriages practised in the land, what was considered the
most desirable for a !shatriya was swayamvara and even among swayamvaras, what was
considered superior by the virtuous was carrying away the bride:s after defeating the other
!shatriyas through valour)
svayamvaram tu r+(any+h praamsanti upay+nti ca
pramathya tu hrt+m +huh (y+yasm dharmav+dinah.
lsewhere hishma says, he went there after hearing they were to be won over through
valour) vryaul!+ca t+ (N+tv+.
#e challenges them repeatedly, announcing himself by name and informing them again and
again that he is going to carry them away) bhshmah antanavah !any+ haratti punah
punah.
I do not thin! the people of the day considered this action of hishma evil. 0o, what he did
was the most respectable thing for a warrior hero in his days.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
12/58
Incidentally, even in his insane criticism of hishma, "hishupala does not accuse him of
abducting the princesses for another person 9for his half brother and not for himself>.
/pparently there was nothing wrong with it according to the rules of the times. %hat
"hishupala nds fault with hishma is for abducting a princess who was anya!+m+ & who
desired another man. #e is referring e'clusively to /mba.
Karve also ma!es "hishupala say that the whole world !new that /mba had chosen:married
"halva. In the #indi te't, "hishupala tells hishma) 6amb+ ne +lva !+ varan !iy+ th+. s+r
duniy+ is b+t !o (+nt th. phir bh tum ne us!+ haran !ar l+ye.8 The nglish te't is) 6Though
it was !nown to all that /mba had been promised to "halva, you abducted her.8
%ell, here again Karve is wrong. This is how the passage she is referring to appears in the
Mahabharata)
anya!+m+ hi dharma(Na !anya!+ pr+(nam+nin+
amb+ n+meti bhadram te !atham s+pahrt+ tvayi
Translated, this means) #ow was it that you, who thin! you !now dharma, carried away the
virtuous maiden called /mba who desired another man3
*nli!e what Karve says, "hishupala does not say anywhere that the whole world !new /mba
had chosen or married "halva. /ll he says is she was anya!NmN & desired, and:or was
desired by, another man. In the Mahabharata, what happened between /mba and "halva
before she was abducted by hishma was their own secret. /mba herself says her love for
"halva and "halvas love for her was their secret 1 even their father did not !now that. ven
in her most furious moments, /mba does not accuse hishma of carrying her away !nowing
that she belonged to another. True, this is the version of the story that hishma tells on the
eve of the Mahabharata war, e'plaining why he will not ght "hi!handi, who is a
reincarnation of /mba. In spite of this, however, there is no indication anywhere in the
Mahabharata that it was public !nowledge 9s+r duniy+ is b+t !o (+nt th. & it was public!nowledge.> that /mba had chosen:married "halva.
/part from putting the words Ethe whole world !new /mba had chosen:married "halva into
the mouth of "hishupala, the author in her own words asserts this soon after) Eamb+ man se
+lva !i thi (+nte hue bhi bhshma use rath mein baith+!ar !yon l+y+38 9?espite !nowing
that /mba in her heart belonged to "halva, why did hishma carry her away in the chariot3>
@B@
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
13/58
/ccording to Iravati Karve, the reason why other men of the Kuru family were not considered
for the niyoga with /mbi!a is that choosing another male from the royal family would have
given that person the position of the father of the future !ing and much power would have
gone into his hands & and away from hishmas hands. "o, she says, it occurred to "atyavati
and hishma that someone unrelated to the royal family of the Kurus would be the ideal
choice.
%as hishma so power1greedy, li!e a modern politician3 %as the choice made so that
hishmas power would not be reduced3
%hile that certainly is not impossible, I feel a di5erent possibility. The choice, once hishma
re(ected the honour, was made not on the basis of whom to avoid, but on the basis of whom
to select. Dyasa, the person chosen was not e'actly some Eforest1dwelling brahmana, but
"atyavatis own son. /nd it is "atyavati who suggests his name when hishma puts forward
the suggestion that the niyoga be performed by some noble brahmana.
%e !now that when "hantanu wanted to marry "atyavati, then commonly !nown as Kali, her
father ?ashara(a insisted that the marriage would ta!e place only if a promise was made
that the son born to her would inherit "hantanus throne. Hoing beyond this, he also loo!ed
into the possibility that if hishma married, his sons born in the future might ma!e claims
over the throne. To avoid this possibility, hishma ta!es his two well !nown vows) one,
giving up his claim over the throne, and the other, forswearing se' and becoming a lifelong
celibate. %e generallynassume these were the conditions that ?ashara(a set, and Kali
"atyavati had nothing to do with them.
#ow true is this3 2ouldnt ?ashara(a have been e'pressing Kalis desires and ma!ing
demands on her behalf3 Crom what we !now of Kali, she was a hard bargainer. %hen
$arashara, Dyasas father, saw her and desired her, she does not give herself to him straight
away, but sets conditions before him. True, we do not see in the Mahabharata her setting
these conditions & her story is told very brie4y there. #owever, if we go by the ?evi
hagavata $urana, rst she ridicules him for being obsessed with her, a sh1smelling girl,
whose fowl smell spread for miles around. 6?o I not disgust you,8 she as!s him. The sagesresponse is to turn her sh smell into the fragrance of mus!. Then she ob(ects to ma!ing
love in the day light. The sage creates a mist and through it, dar!ness. Then she ob(ects to
ma!ing love while they are in the river & she was ferrying him across the Yamuna. $arashara
agrees to wait until they reach the other ban!. "he then ta!es from him the promise that
her father 9and other people> do not come to !now of what they are going to do, and the
boon that she will retain her virginity even after intercourse. It is only then she gives herself
to him
2ouldnt this Kali1"atyavati have been the one who demanded all those vows from "hantanuand young "atyavrata3 2ouldnt her father ?ashara(a have been merely e'pressing her
wishes3 Isnt it possible that it was Kali who was really power hungry and not ?ashara(a3
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
14/58
I believe it is uite possible that "atyavati had a hunger for power. $erhaps in her there was
the power hunger of a princess brought up as a shergirl and it is that hunger that made her
bargain with "hantanu and "atyavarata 9hishma> in the beginning. /nd it is perhaps the
same power hunger, once she nds an opportunity, that made her choose her son Dyasa as
the man to perform niyoga with her daughters1in1law. That way she could ma!e sure that it
is her blood that inherits the throne. It would be the same, from her standpoint, as2hitrangadas or Dichitraviryas son occupying the throne. /ll three are eually her sons.
It is very possible that it was uite innocently that hishma suggested that the niyoga be
done with a brahmana. It is very possible that "atyavati pounced on this opportunity and
decided to have it done with her son Dyasa.
@B@
/ very minor thing. Karve sees Kunti as E!a moti tagdi8 & uite hefty and fat, implying
unattractiveness. ut that is not how the Mahabharata sees her. "he gives the impression of
being a strong woman, but that is because of her great inner strength. @therwise, the epic
describes her as irresistibly beautiful. #ere are a few descriptions of her physical beauty
from the verses dealing with her swayamvara) prthulalocan+, with large eyes, which in India
have always been a sign of beautyA te(aswin & lustrousA rupayauvana+lini & endowed with
beauty and youth. @ther words used to describe her are adbhutadaran+, wondrous to loo!
at, subhag+, auspicious one, and tanumadhyam+, slender1waisted. "he is far from beingE!a moti tagdi. 9To Karves credit, in the nglish version, done by herself, she alters this
and says that 6she was apparently a large, big1boned girl.8 $erhaps she was, who !nows,
though the Mahabharata says nothing li!e that.>
@B@
@ne of the most interesting uestions Karve as!s in her essay is why hishma chose toaccept the position of the commander1in1chief of the Kaurava army. %hy did he not decide
to go to the forest and spend his old days there, when his stepmother did3 @r if not then, at
least why did he not go on a pilgrimage on the eve of the war, as alarama did, since his
heart too was divided3 Karves answer is interesting) hishma accepted the position of the
commander1in1chief of the Kaurava army so that he could slow down the war in the hope of
the war being called o5 by ?uryodhana seeing that he was not winning. Karve also sees a
second reason behind his acceptance of the postion) to !eep Karna away from battling for
?uryodhana so long as he lived.
In the conte't of this discussion, Karve ma!es this fascinating observation. Tal!ing of
?uryodhanas o5er of the position of the commander1in1chief of his army to hishma, the
author says) $andavon ne use !ulvrddh hone !a (o gaurav nahin diya, us !i !haanapoori
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
15/58
duryodhan ne !i. ?uryodhana gave him the respect that was his due as the eldest of the
!ula, which the $andavas did not give him. "he is referring to the $andavas not o5ering him
the agrapu(a during the ra(asuya, as the nglish te't ma!es clear) 6the honor which had
been denied to him by the $andavas at the sacrice.8
%hen you thin! of it, it is rather strange that the $andavas did not do it. #e was the eldestof the Kuru family 9ahli!a was there, but he was not a dominant gure.> #is reputation as
an indomitable warrior was great & even the redoubtable $arashurama, his guru, had not
been able to defeat him in battle. #e was learned in every branch of !nowledge and he
commanded great respect for his integrity. In every sense of the word, hishma was a living
legend. esides, the $andavas were very close to his heart, and they themselves held him in
great reverence and were indebted to him for so many things. #e seems to be the natural
choice. I doubt if the thought of the agrapu(a being o5ered to Krishna had come to anyones
mind before hishma suggested it. Yet when it comes to the agrapu(a, the $andavas do not
o5er it to him. Instead, Yudhishthira as!s the grandsire to whom it should be o5ered.
/fter hishmas fall in the war, when time comes for the ne't commander1in1chief to be
appointed, ?uryodhana does a very clever thing. Lather than straight away ma!ing ?rona
the ne't commander1in1chief, he as!s Karna, who is the other claimant to the position, who
should be given that position. /s!ed thus, even if Karna desired that position and felt he was
the best choice, it becomes rather delicate for him to do say so. #e suggests that ?rona be
given that position and ?uryodhana happily does so.
It is perhaps the same thing happening here. Lather than o5ering the pu(a to hishma,
Yudhishthira goes and as!s him who should be given the position. hishma naturally does
not claim it for himself but suggests Krishnas name. %as Yudhishthira deliberately denying
that honour to hishma through that uestion3 %as hishmas ready acceptance of the
position of the commander1in1chief of the Kaurava army at least partly in4uenced by
Yudhishthiras not giving him the honour that was his due3 I thin! there is a strong
possibility of this being so, as Karve suggests.
Karves discussion on the age of hishma is one of the most conservative and clear I havecome across. "he argues that hishma should be at least ninety1two and possibly one
hundred and two at the time of the war. In her discussion though, she forgets to add some
years. /fter being appointed yuvara(a, ?evavrata remains as the crown prince for four years
9varsh+ni chatv+ri>. The epic tells as that the battle between the two 2hitrangadas lasted
three years. These years are not added to her calculation.
/ccording to Karve, at the time when he carried away the Kashi princesses from their
swayamvara hall, hishma must be a minimum of thirty1four years old. %ell, in the conte't
of the swayamvara, the Mahabharata uses the word Evrddha meaning an old man todescribe him three times in three consecutive verses and in the third verse it describes him
as valpalitadh+ranah & his s!in is wrin!led from age and his hair is white. The princesses
ta!e one loo! at him, and they turn around and run away seeing how old he is. This is hardly
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
16/58
the description of a thirty1four year old royal warrior. There is no uestion of premature
aging in the case of hishma & his health was perfect until his last days.
There are more years that Karve fails to add. "he says Dichitraveerya died soon immediately
after his marriage. The Mahabharata tells us that he lives a life of indulgence with his two
wives for seven years 9t+bhy+m saha sam+h sapta viharan> after which he falls sic!./ttempts are made to cure him through all !nown means, which too must have ta!en time.
"he gives one year gap between hima and /r(una & the Mahabharata mentions at least two
years. @f course that does not ma!e much di5erence in calculating hishmas age. ut she
also mentions /r(una must have been at least si'teen years of age at the time of his
marriage with ?raupadi. %ell, he has completed his studies in the meantime, completed a
digvi(aya while Yudhishthira was the crown prince 9this maybe an interpolation>, and, after
the house of lac was set re to, lived in the (ungle for some while. "i'teen seems too less.
/lso, there is a passage 9again possibly an interpolation> which very specically mentionsthat $andu died on /r(unas si'teenth birthday & while the birthday celebrations were going
on, while Kunti was busy serving meals to the invited brahmanas, $andu ta!es Madri with
him to the (ungle and there meets with his death. If $andus death happens when /r(una is
si'teen, then all the incidents mentioned earlier are subseuent to this, ma!ing /r(una
much older at the time of his marriage.
@f course, between ninety1two and one hundred and two is very old indeed and adding up
all these years to that will ma!e hishma impossibly old. $erhaps Karve was right in trying
to arrive at a conservative estimate, though the epic di5ers from the gures she gives.
@B@
These problems are there with Yuganta. ut in spite of all these, I want to repeat, Karves
study is brilliant and e'tremely valuable. The stand she ta!es for loo!ing at the epic story is
thoroughly rational and boldly independent and her analytical powers are admirably superb.
?eepu-uly O, BBP at ;)B /M
This is a good and detailed critiue of KarveQs Yuganta. I have been meaning to read this,
and your analysis only ma!es me want it more.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
17/58
Yuganta and the Didura1Yudhishthira Lelationship i...
Mahabharata) Light to the harata Throne
he )u**le of )andu
by +atya haitanya
(ne of the most beautiful si!hts I have ever seen is
a male and a female deer united in coitus. I can still
vividly recall the scene from three decades a!o
because every small detail of it is indelibly etched inmy mind ) so radiant was the si!ht. There was the
deer park, with a tall net fence around it, surrounded
by hu!e trees in verdant !reen. In the distance was a
hillock and nearby, a lar!e lake with branches of
ancient trees bendin! into it, under which I often sat
with a book in my hand as the sun serenely
&ourneyed towards the ocean in the western sky. The
matin! deer couple stood there, the front le!s of the
male over the doe, their bodies united. The female
was absolutely still, not a muscle moved in her
body, her eyes did not blink* and in those eyes, inher entire body you could see total surrender,
http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Writers&WriterID=1345&CategoryID=45http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Writers&WriterID=1345&CategoryID=45 -
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
18/58
surrender to the act that was !oin! on, surrender to
life, surrender to e+istence. he was no more she
then, she had lost her individuality, her identity as
an individual animal, and had become one with her-other, with mother nature, she had ceased to e+ist
as separate from her. It looked as thou!h she was in
some deep trance, a trance that had filled her bein!
with the bliss of surrender to the total. The
movement of life all around the united couple, the
uiet, unhurried movement of the other deer in the
park as they nibbled here and there, the !entle
swin!in! of the trees in the soft bree/e, all seemed
to add to the stillness in which the doe stood. I was
so overwhelmed by the si!ht that after I moved
away from the park it took me hours to come backto the reality of everyday livin!.
The -ahabharata tells us 0andu saw e+actly this same si!ht when he was out huntin! one
day. The ne+t moment he took out five sharp arrows, !olden and shinin!, with beautiful
feathers attached to them, and shot the male and the female. The male, who was a sa!e
who had chan!ed himself into a deer, the epic tells us, cursed 0andu in his moments of
death that 0andu would meet with his death when he made love to his wife because he
had killed him while he was en!a!ed in coitus.
0andu had seen the deer couple was en!a!ed in se+ ) the -ahabharata makes it very
clear. 1e killed them seein! with his eyes that they were makin! love. $indama, the sa!e
who had transformed himself into the deer, tells 0andu what he had done was unthinkable
) not even men totally devoid of all intelli!ence, men who were constantly en!a!ed in
sin, men who had no control over their lusts and an!er, did what he had done. $illin! a
male and a female while they were en!a!ed in coitus is truly unheard of. 1ow could a
kin! of the 2haratas, a royal family so rooted in ri!hteousness, do such a thin!?
The uestion $indama asked 0andu pu//led me for a lon!, lon! time. In my attempt to
understand 0andu and the nature of his action, I read repeatedly all that the -ahabharata
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
19/58
tells us about 0andu. %nd the deeper I delved into his life and his personality, the more
pu//led I became. 3verythin! about 0andu seemed to be a riddle.
4or instance, why would a youn! prince after spendin! thirty ni!hts with his new wife
and with an earlier wife, leave them and !o on a world conuest in which he ruthlessly, to
use the words of the -ahabharata, reduces 5his rival kin!s to ashes6? hy would that
youn! prince, the lon! awaited occupant of the throne of the $uru"2haratas, adored byall, immediately after completin! a world conuest, at the hei!ht of his !lory, leave
everythin! behind and !o to the forest takin! his two wives with him to make huntin! his
full time occupation? The -ahabharata tells us that his wives advised him to do so. hy
would two youn! wives of a lustrous youn! kin! ask him to leave behind his kin!dom
and all its comforts as well as the challen!e and responsibility of rulin! it and !o and live
in the forest, spendin! his time huntin!?
%nd there were other riddles.
0andu had to ask his wives to be!et children for him with the help of other men throu!h
the ancient custom of niyoga, in which a man other than the husband impre!nated
women. hy e+actly did he have to do that? as it because of the curse of $indama? (r
had 0andu been impotent all alon!? 1ow e+actly did he die? %nd the day he chose to die:
the fourteenth birthday of his son %r&una. %nd the time: It is while mantras were bein!
chanted by a section of the brahmanas and a feast was bein! served to other brahmanas by
$unti that 0andu leads -adri away into the uietude of the &un!le where he later makes
love to her and meets with his death.
hy did he do that? as %r&una6s birthday no occasion for celebration for 0andu? as he
re!isterin! his protest a!ainst the celebration, and a!ainst %r&una and $unti, by walkin!
away from the feast of which he was the host and hence shouldn6t have left? If so, what
was he protestin! a!ainst?
-y first clue came from a verse in the epic. %s 0andu lay dead after en!a!in! in se+ with
his youn!er wife -adri, $unti who comes rushin! to the scene blames her for their
husband6s death. %nd then she says: 72lessed are you, -adri, and more fortunate than I
am. 4or, you were able to see the face of the kin! rapturous.??????? DhanyA t"am asi
bAhlee!i matto bhAgyatarA tathA, drshta"atyasi yad "a!tram prahrshtasya maheepateh -Adi /0./#. $unti was referrin! to the ecstasy of a se+ual clima+ that still lin!ered on the
dead 0andu6s face ) an e+pression $unti was familiar with on other men6s faces, on the
faces of the four different men who had fathered her children, but was never lucky to see
on the face of 0andu, her husband.
The -ahabharata tells us specifically that a smile lin!ered on 0andu6s face even in his
death.
$unti had never once in her life seen 0andu6s face lost in the throes of se+ual ecstasy. hehad never once seen on his face that post"coital smile of contentment that was there in his
death. %nd yet nothin! in the -ahabharata tells us that 0andu had re&ected her se+ually.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
20/58
1e was deeply in love with her from the day she chose him for a husband to the last day
of his life. o if this first wife of his, this beautiful woman he had obtained for himself in
aswayam"araand had brou!ht home proudly, the woman he had lived with in re!al
comforts in 1astinapura and in the loneliness of &un!les and mountains, the woman who
was his constant companion all throu!h his lonely, tortured life, hadn6t once seen his face
so in all their life to!ether, and that in spite of 0andu bein! desperate for children, then
the conclusion is clear and inevitable:)andu was impotent all through his married life.
That e+plains a lot of thin!s about 0andu. 4or instance, it e+plains why 2heeshma was in
a hurry to !et a second wife for him. The -ahabharata does not tell us how lon! it was
before 2heeshma went and !ot -adri for 0andu as a wife, payin! a bride price as the
-adra"2ahleeka custom demanded to her brother halya. It &ust tells us a word that
means 5then6 or 5afterwards6 in the be!innin! verse of a new chapter ) this then could be
immediately after the $unti"0andu marria!e, it could be sometime later too. 8ettin!
youn! 0andu a second wife as soon as he had obtained for himself one wife does not
make sense, unless it was meant to be an ur!ent political alliance, which it does not looklike. 2esides, 2heeshma would have been very, very reluctant to offer his nephew two
youn! beautiful wives at the same time ) he had done it with 0andu6s father
9ichitraveerya and the conseuences were disastrous.
9ichitra had been obsessed with his two pretty ueens that he spent his entire time in se+
with them and eventually died of the dreaded royal disease of the day,rajaya!shma, all the
royal physicians from the kin!dom and abroad failin! to save his life. It is this death that
had made necessary the hated niyogaswhich produced Dhritarashtra, 0andu and 9idura.
It is e+tremely unlikely that a once scalded 2heeshma would want to repeat hise+perience.
The second marria!e should have been after some time and there should have been an
important reason behind it. It was not a love marria!e but an arran!ed one, a political
alliance does not seem to have been a desperate necessity, which leaves us one other
stron! possibility. The marria!e had failed to produce what the $uru"2harata family
needed more ur!ently than anythin! else: an heir to 0andu, in case anythin! happened to
the youn! kin!. The $unti"0andu marria!e had failed to produce offsprin!, which would
be the case because 0andu was impotent from the be!innin!. 2heeshma, who had no idea
that $unti was already a mother before her marria!e, must have assumed this could bebecause of some fault with her ) the woman is the first suspect in such cases and !ettin! a
second wife is the easiest solution for the man, particularly for a kin!. 1e mi!ht not even
have considered the possibility that 0andu was impotent. %nd 0andu mi!ht not have
revealed it himself, nor $unti. o 2heeshma !ets -adri as a second wife for 0andu.
It also e+plains why 0andu left on a world conuest thirty ni!hts after his weddin! with
-adri. The -ahabharata tells us it is e+actly after thirty ni!hts that he left on the
conuest ) and the words used are not thirty days, but thirty ni!hts. i!hts of a whole
month. It must have been a terrible whole month for an impotent 0andu. 1e had now two!or!eous wives, each as beautiful as a !oddess, and yet there was nothin! he could do in
their beds since he was impotent. % bitter, frustrated, furious 0andu !athers his army and
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
21/58
leaves on a world conuest. 1e had failed to prove his manhood in his bed, but he had to
prove it somewhere, and now he could prove it in the battlefield. 0andu was sava!e in the
battlefield, as we should e+pect him to be, the -ahabharata tells us. 1e did not &ust win
battles, but burnt his rivals to ashes. 1e then came back victorious brin!in! with him
enormous wealth.
Describin! this, the -ahabharata uses a very unusual e+pression to describe thetriumphant 0andu on his return to1astinapura2 punar3mudita3"ahanah. (n this return
&ourney to 1astinapura, even 5his vehicles were happy ) once a!ain6. That is to say 0andu
was once a!ain happy and even his vehicles, his horses, his elephants all reflected his
happiness. The words once a!ain are si!nificant: they speak of previous unhappiness. It
was not a happy 0andu that had left on the conuest, but an unhappy one. ;nhappy
because he had failed to prove himself a man in his chamber. 1appy because he had now
proved himself a man in the battlefield. The bitterness, the frustration, the fury in him has
been e+hausted ) at least for the time bein!.
hat happened ne+t is also e+plained by the fact that he was impotent from the
be!innin!. 0andu does not add the conuered wealth to the treasury of the $uru"2haratas,
as we would e+pect him to have done. Instead he distributes it all amon! 2heeshma,
atyavati, %mbika, %mbalika, 9idura, his friends and so on. It is as thou!h he wanted
them all to see the amount of wealth he had won, the !lory he had attained ) and certify
how much of a man he was. The wealth is so much that we are told Dhritarashtra later
performed a hundred ashwamedhasacrifices with it.
ow he does one of the stran!est thin!s ever. 4ollowin! the ur!in! of his wives, he
decides to leave the kin!dom and !o to the &un!le with them, to live his life there en!a!ed
in huntin!< 0andu is the ruler of 1astinapura, the lon!"awaited ruler, he has &ust taken
over the rei!ns of the kin!dom in his hands, he has proved himself to be competent as a
kin! by successfully wa!es battles in a conuest of the directions, and immediately after
that he decides to leave the kin!dom behind and !o and live in the &un!le with his wives.
%nd there is no motivation like what %shoka later felt post the $alin!a war.
1is mother, amon! others, who, to brin! him into this world so that the $uru line would
not come to an end and will have a le!itimate ruler, had to submit herself to the
abomination of a niyogawhich she found repulsive and shrank away from with all herbein!, must have been shocked by 0andu6s decision.
hy did 0andu do somethin! like that? % stron! possibility that comes to mind is that he
did not want 2heeshma to brin! him yet another wife. 1e had no answer to the accusin!
!lances of his mother and !randmother, and the man who had brou!ht him up like a son )
his uncle 2heeshma. -aybe others too uestioned him, some in words and some by other
means, enuirin! when the baby princes were comin!. %s it happens in every family. 1e
has no answer to them. 1e must have discussed this with his wives, from whom he could
not have hidden the facts of the matter. They in their wisdom and understandin! advisedhim to leave everythin! and !o to the &un!le and live with them there. o one would
torment him there.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
22/58
=>=
If 0andu had been impotent all alon!, then it is not because of the curse of the sa!e that he
was forced to have his children be!otten by other men. Is the story of the curse by the
sa!e then not real? Did nothin! like that ever take place? Is the story an attempt to cover
up 0andu6s impotence from the be!innin!, to find an 5acceptable6 reason for it?
ell, the entire story need not be a lie. 2ut it looks like part of it definitely is a lie: the
part that says that it is the curse of the sa!e who had chan!ed himself into a deer that
made it impossible for 0andu to have se+ual relations with his wives. That part may be a
later addition to the story of what 0andu actually did to the deer couple. hat could have
happened is that 0andu saw a male and a female deer in coitus in the &un!le and shot them
dead. ust that.
2ut then why would, as we asked earlier, a cultured man like 0andu, a scion of the noble
2harata dynasty, do such a thin! as that?
% possible answer is: for the same reasons that turned him impotent.
There is every reason to believe that 0andu6s impotence was psycholo!ical. 0andu was
physically fit. 1e was a mi!hty warrior who was a terror to his enemies. 3+cept for the
paleness of his skin, there is no mention of any physical deficiency in him. %nd his death
comes while en!a!ed in an act of se+ with his wife. %ll these point at his impotence
havin! been psycholo!ical and not physical.
%re there then psycholo!ical reasons that could have caused impotence in 0andu?
@iterature on the psychopatholo!y of impotence tells us that while impotence may have
physical causes in males over forty, it is almost always of psycholo!ical ori!in in males
under forty* that psychopatholo!ical impotence may be associated with a very restrictive
upbrin!in! concernin! se+, ne!ative attitudes toward se+, ne!ative or traumatic se+ual
e+periences and other deep"seated causal factors such as unconscious feelin!s of hostility,
fear, inadeuacy, or !uilt.
Aould 0andu6s impotence have risen from any of these sources? To answer that uestionwe will have to look into 0andu6s past ) particularly into his early years as a child when
he was most impressionable and into the years when he was an adolescent and his
se+uality was blossomin!. ;nfortunately the -ahabharata !ives us no details of these
years and for that reason all that we can do is con&uncture about them.
%s we all know, 0andu was the son born to 9yasa and %mbalika throu!h the custom
of niyoga. 1is mother had become a widow at the death of 0rince 9ichitra. hen he met
with his early death due, accordin! to the epic, to overindul!ence in se+ with his two
wives, %mbika and %mbalika, he had produced no offsprin!. The illustrious line of the
$uru"2haratas was now without a man ualified to sit on the throne on which such
le!endary kin!s as -anu, 0uroorava, ahusha, Yayati, Dushyanta, 2harata, 1astin,
%&ameedha, $uru, and hantanu had sat, without a head to wear their proud crown.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
23/58
Devavrata 2heeshma was there, of course, but he had taken the vow not to sit on the
throne thou!h he would stand by it. The $urus were desperately in need of a prince.
It was 2heeshma whom atyavati approached first ) she must have felt now that her
father6s !reed had come to nou!ht and 2heeshma6s vows had been rendered meanin!less
by mi!hty time, he should take the rei!ns of the kin!dom into his own hands to which
they ori!inally belon!ed. 2heeshma refused ) vows were vows and he would not breakthem. 0erhaps it was the bitterness in him speakin!, perhaps this is what had become of
him because of that bitterness or maybe he had become really 2heeshma ) the aura
around his vows had imprisoned him in its awesome !lare. hatever the reason,
2heeshma decided his vow and himself were !reater than the desperate need of the $uru"
2harata empire and refused both to marry and be!et children and to perform niyogain
9ichitraveerya6s 5fields6 and produce offsprin!. 3ventually 9yasa had to be called in and
this other half"brother of 9ichitra had to do theniyogain spite of his reluctance.
The niyogawas not a happy incident for 0andu6s mother %mbalika &ust as it was not forher sister %mbika, Dhritarashtra6s mother, either. In spite of knowin! it would be 9yasa
who would be performin! the niyoga, when the sa!e entered her room and approached
her bed, %mbalika was horrified and turned pale. The act of conceivin! 0andu was an act
of indescribable horror and repu!nance to his mother. o !reat was the repu!nance and
horror the sisters felt that they refused to under!o the torture a second time and when
forced, sent a maid in their place. %nd after the conception and !ivin! birth to 0andu,
%mbalika, like her sister after conceivin! and !ivin! birth to Dhritarashtra, withdrew into
a shell from which she never came out.
It is unlikely that 0andu !rew up without hearin! palace rumors about his birth. In a place
packed with maids and slaves as the palace of 1astinapura was, it is impossible that this
did not happen to a child who had no father and was totally ne!lected by his mother. It
should not surprise us if he had heard, or at least overheard, what happened in some
!raphic details. The incident involves niyoga, it involves se+ between a youn! widowed
princess and a sa!e and such stuff is ideal for !ossip. 1ow a youn! sensitive mind would
react to such talk he hears is impossible to predict and 0andu was definitely a very
sensitive child and later a very sensitive man. In 0andu6s case it appears that the result
was an unconscious horror of se+, for what he heard was about his own mother. The
ima!es that the !ossip he heard !enerated must have been played repeatedly over andover a!ain in his mind, renderin! him eventually psycholo!ically impotent. It is not
impossible that every time he approached one of his wives, the ima!e of his mother, of
the horrible e+perience she was sub&ected to, ima!es of his mother6s horror and aversion
at the moment of his conception, all rushed into his mind.
4rom the picture of him that the -ahabharata presents to us, 0andu appears to have been
a man capable of !reat love, at least to be!in with. %s a child he must have loved his
mother deeply, as is shown by his act of offerin! at her feet part of the wealth he had
brou!ht from the conuest. @istenin! to all those stories from palace !ossip, stories thatcould have been very confusin! to a child, he must have felt like countless other children
that se+ was somethin! horrid that men did to women. It wouldn6t be surprisin! if he had
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
24/58
felt he too had a share in sub&ectin! his mother to that horrid act ) partly because he was a
male and partook of the crime of all males towards women and partly because his mother
had to under!o it all for his sake, so that he could be born. The result would have been
!uilt, powerful !uilt.
I wonder what 2heeshma6s effect on the child and adolescent 0andu could have been with
re!ard to his se+ual development. The -ahabharata tells us that it was 2heeshma whomostly brou!ht him up. 1ere was a man who had become a le!end in his own lifetime for
more than anythin! else because he had denied se+ to himself. The whole world looked
up at him with awe. 1e had said no to women once and then, even when be!!ed to break
his vow, stuck to his vow. The -ahabharata does not tell us what his relations with
atyavati were ) when hantanu saw her and fell hopelessly in love with her, Devavrata
had already been officially appointed the crown prince and what she had done was to
snatch away from his head that crown of yuvara&a.
The -ahabharata does not tell us if he hated her for this, if he hated all women because ofthis. It is possible that he did, considerin! how adamantly he stuck to his vow of havin!
nothin! to do with women, thou!h he was always perfectly !entlemanly and chivalrous in
his behavior towards them. 0erhaps his forcin! 8andhari to marry his blind nephew
Dhritarashtra and his capturin! by force and brin!in! to 1astinapura the three $ashi
princesses from theirswayam"arahall speak of his contempt for women, thou!h these
actions were not very rare in his days. The vow that he would never fi!ht a woman too
speaks of his dislike and contempt for women.
%lso relevant to our discussion is 2heeshma6s attitude towards women in !eneral as
e+pressed in a chapter in theAnushasana )ar"aBAh CE, thou!h it is possible that this
discussion does not really represent 2heeshma6s views on women and is a philosophical
discussion added later to the epic in his name. %t the openin! of this chapter, Yudhishthira
tells 2heeshma that women are the root of all evil and it has been said that they are mean"
minded. 1e then asks 2heeshma to tell him about the nature of women. In answer,
2heeshma uotes the answer theApsara0anchachooda had !iven arada who had asked
her the same uestion, approvin! of her words. hat follows is a downri!ht
condemnation of women. e are told that even pretty women with husbands, born in
noble families, do not remain within bounds. (nce they !et an opportunity to meet
outsiders, they do not bother even for husbands who are famous, rich and endowed withunparalleled handsomeness, even when these husbands do everythin! to please them.
omen can !ive themselves to the !reatest sinners, without feelin! any shame about it.
There is no man woman wouldn6t !ive themselves to ) his a!e, his other conditions,
nothin! matters to them* all that is needed is that he be a male. 1e may be a deformed
dwarf, it does not matter* he may be nauseatin!ly repulsive, that does not matter. %ll that
matters to women is that he is male. %nd if men are not available to satisfy their lust,
women will have no hesitation to seek se+ual pleasure from other women. 4or, women
are &ust never satiated se+ually* with them it is as fire is never satiated with wood, the
ocean is never satiated with rivers, death by consumin! mortals.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
25/58
0anchachooda has words to say about the nature of women which I am reluctant to write
here ) so blunt and crude is she in her description of the evil that women are. 0ut death,
fierce storms, the evil world under!round, massive, all consumin! confla!rations, the
sharp ed!es of weapons, poison, fierce snakes, wei!h all these a!ainst &ust woman on the
other side and woman would be no less than all these terrors put to!ether, says
0anchachooda in words that 2heeshma approves of and uotes to Yudhishthira answerin!
his uestion.
Years of almost sin!le"handed upbrin!in! by 2heeshma who held such views on women,
by the man from whom a fishermaid had snatched away the throne of the crown prince of
an empire that was already his because his father in his old a!e had contemptuously fallen
in love with her, the man who for the sake of his father6s lust for her had to take the
terrible vow of life"lon! continence, the man who had the very vicious and distasteful
e+perience with %mba that eventually forced him to en!a!e his own !uru in a fierce
battle, couldn6t have but left its marks on the tender soul of the !rowin! child 0andu.
%nd if that is not enou!h, consider the two references to his linea!e 0andu makes
immediately after killin! the deer in coitus and feelin! !uilty about it: 1e is the son of
the !amatma9ichitraveerya, the prince whose soul itself was lust, born to him in his
kshetra, 5field6, be!otten by 9yasa.
hat is the le!acy of 9ichitraveerya that 0andu considers himself an heir to? @ust. @ust
that brou!ht death. @ust in which 3ros and Thanatos met. The adolescent 9ichitra was so
enamored by the two beautiful princesses whom his half"brother had brou!ht for him that
he spent his days and ni!hts in a sin!le passion ) makin! love to them. 1e became a
victim to the dreaded disease rajaya!shmaand no doctor could pull him back from the
&aws of death. 9ichitra also brou!ht with him the le!acy of an old emperor6s lust for a
youn! maid ) hantanu6s lust for the fishermaid atyavati. %nd atyavati herself is a
product of lust. $in! ;parichara had !one to the &un!le on a huntin! trip re&ectin! his
wife6s invitation to him to !o to bed with her. he had made her desire known to him
throu!h a messa!e she had sent him informin! him she had &ust had her ritual bath after
her monthly periods and was ea!erly waitin! for him in their bedchamber. In the &un!le
the kin! was unable to control his lust ) all around him nature stood bathed in all her
estrous !lory, the matin! calls of birds filled the air around him thick with the scent of
passion. atyavati was the child born to that kin! who had lost control over himself, bornto an apsara livin! as a fish in the Yamuna accordin! to the -ahabharata ) in all
probability a fisher!irl who satisfied the kin!6s lust of the moment.
This is a le!acy of lust ) strai!ht and unmi+ed with anythin! else. The other linea!e he
speaks of is perhaps more confusin!. 9ichitra6s biolo!ical father is 9yasa ) born of sa!e
0arashara6s lust for the fish"smellin! $ali"atyavati, lust that was unwillin! to wait even
so lon! as it takes for $ali and the sa!e to cross the river. Their union took place in the
boat itself, ri!ht in the middle of the river. 9yasa brin!s in his blood the irrepressible lust
of 0arashara and of ;parichara 9asu. 2ut at the same time, 9yasa is an ascetic too ) aman who had his se+uality under control, thou!h he too had slipped once, thus be!ettin!
his son huka. 0andu6s 9yasa linea!e is thus both of lust and asceticism.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
26/58
% very restrictive upbrin!in! concernin! se+, ne!ative attitudes toward se+, ne!ative or
traumatic se+ual e+periences, thou!h at second"hand, other deep"seated factors such as
unconscious feelin!s of hostility, fear, and !uiltF 0andu seems to have had his share of
all these elements that cause psychopatholo!ical impotence ) and a rich share of them at
that.
=>=
In the -ahabharata, and in fewer details in the Gamayana, we have the story of
$almashapada. $almashapada was an ancestor of Gama who had received a curse from
his !uru 9asishtha which transformed him into a Gakshasa. hile livin! his accursed life
as a Gakshasa, $almashapada meets a 2rahman youth and his youn! wife in a forest. The
couple were in the &un!le makin! love and they had not yet completed their act when they
saw the Gakshasa and ran away. $almashapada cau!ht the brahmana, and the brahmani
be!!ed him not to eat him up. he told him of how she was in her ritu, how desperate
they were for a child, how they hadn6t finished their matin! act and therefore he shouldspare her husband. $almashapada did not heed her and went ahead and ate up the
2rahmin youth. %n!irasi, the brahmani, wept bitter tears ) and so deep was her pain that
as each drop of her tears fell on the !round, it became a bla/in! fire and burnt up the
place.
The brahmani then cursed $almashapada. 1e had interrupted her and her husband
makin! love and killed her husband. 1e would not be able to make love to his wife any
more ) if he ever made love to his wife durin! her ritu, the period sanctioned for
lovemakin!, he would die. %lmost the identical curse as 0andu received and for almost
identical reasons. It is this curse that made it impossible for $almashapada to have se+
with his wife -adayanti and forced him to offer her to his !uru 9asishtha forniyoga.
@ike $almashapada, 0andu too carried a curse on him. 1is impotence was the result of
that curse ) but that curse was not !iven by $indama. 0andu was cursed lon! before he
killed the deer. 1is curse was a result of his very restrictive upbrin!in! concernin! se+,
his ne!ative attitudes toward se+, the traumatic se+ual e+perience of his mother the
trauma of which he had internali/ed, unconscious feelin!s of se+ual hostility, fear, !uilt.
Do insi!hts from psycholo!y or psychopatholo!y e+plain why 0andu killed the deeren!a!ed in coitus? They do. %nnals of criminolo!y are full of crimes committed by men
who have ne!ative attitudes towards se+, have deep unconscious feelin!s of se+ual
hostility and !uilt, have been forced to suppress or repress se+ for one reason or other,
have an unsatisfactory se+ual life, whose natural se+ual lon!in!s have remained
unfulfilled. @ust killin!, se+ murder ) these are terms used for acts like what 0andu did,
thou!h crime literature mostly talks about acts committed a!ainst humans.
0erhaps these insi!hts would also e+plain his fury in the battlefields that made 0andu
5reduce his enemies to ashesH, thou!h this could be a very natural thin! to do for akshatriya and a prince in those days. 2ut it is a fact that 0andu derived pleasure from
killin! ) he devoted in entire life after the world conuest to huntin!, which is somethin!
few other kin!s have done, if any.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
27/58
=>=
hy did 0andu choose %r&una6s birthday to take -adri into the uietude of the &un!le and
to make love to her there, meetin! his death in the process? hy did he choose the
precise moment when priests were chantin! sacred incantations invokin! divine blessin!s
on %r&una, the precise moment when brahmana6s were bein! served a feast? as %r&una6s
birthday no occasion for celebration for 0andu? as he re!isterin! his protest a!ainst thecelebration, and a!ainst %r&una and $unti, by walkin! away from the feast of which he
was the host and hence shouldn6t have left? If so, what was he protestin! a!ainst? The
uestions we had asked earlier.
4or those who are not fully conversant with the -ahabharata, the epic describes it was
the uttara phalgunaday on which %r&una had completed fourteen years, the 2rahmins
were chantin! mantras and a feast was bein! offered celebratin! the birthday when 0andu
took the beautiful -adri away into the &un!le and there made love to her. hen he should
have been with his family, when he as the host had an important role to play and shouldhave been receivin! the 2rahmins and &oinin! them in the rituals and the feast, 0andu
uietly slipped out of the place takin! his youn!er wife with him. $unti failed to notice
this because she was busy servin! the meals to the brahmanas.
The Indian tradition forbade se+ durin! the daytime.
The epic tells us he did so because he was overpowered by se+ ) !amamohita. 1e
certainly could have been. 2ut there is also another side to it ) the day and time he chose
speaks of other possibilities. 1e must have been frustrated. It is possible that in spite of
his ur!in! $unti and later -adri to !ive him sons throu!h niyoga, he really hated
the niyogasand felt little affection for them. The niyogasmust definitely have been
humiliatin! for him, as bein! forced to offer his wife to other men for be!ettin! children
would be to any man. Yet he did it for the sake of his afterworlds, so that his ancestors did
not blame him of not payin! back the debt to the manes,pitr3rna, and maybe perhaps
because the eldest of them could inherit the throne. 2ut it is also possible that more than
his desire for children it was his wives6 desire for them that impelled him, thou!h the
-ahabharata does not e+pressly say so. omen6s lon!in! for children is usually lon!er
than men6s ) for while for man children are a need, for women it is the fulfillment of their
bein! women. It is possible that in spite of what the epic tells us and contrary to what weare told by it, it was $unti who was desperate for children rather than 0andu and it was
she who persuaded him to allow her to have children by other men, perhaps Yudhishthira
by 9idura, her de"arbrother"in"law#, traditionally the first choice in case her husband
failed to !ive her a child, and subseuently by two other men. 0andu could have resented
this deeply, thou!h he could not say no to the stron!"willed $unti, and later to -adri
when she sou!ht permission to walk on the path shown by $unti.
That his children are not his children is not somethin! that many men would be able to
tolerate. o 0andu re&ects the birthday celebrations, re&ects the birthday child, re&ects themother of the birthday child, and !oes to the &un!le takin! his softer other wife to the
&un!le with him e+actly when 2rahmins are bein! served at home. %nd on that day, for
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
28/58
the first time in his life, in the passion !iven by his bitterness and loneliness, his
frustration and fury, he succeeds in makin! love to her there, surrounded by nature in
estrus once a!ain. 1is success must have surprised even him, filled him with unspeakable
thrill, uncontrollable rapture. (ne moment he is deep in the abysses of bitterness and fury,
and the ne+t he is in the heavenly hei!hts of the thrill of his first successful lovemakin!.
4rom those hei!hts to which he had soared for the first time in his life, he plun!es strai!ht
into his death.
There was years of bitterness in him. uppressed day after day, week after week, month
after month, year after year, until %r&una has completed fourteen years. %nd then, as the
birthday celebration is !oin! on, violence possesses him, and the e+plosion takes place.
hy %r&una6s birthday? hy not the birthday of 2heema or Yudhishthira, if not of
akula and ahadeva since 0andu seems to have had a softer corner in his heart for
-adri? To answer that uestion we will have to know who %r&una6s father was ) his
human father.
0andu is one of the most tra!ic fi!ures in Indian literature. 1is is the tale of innocence
punished for the crimes of others. 1e carries a curse with him ) the burden of the
knowled!e of the story of his birth, of his linea!e, which makes his life hell. 0andu6s life
elouently portrays how our life is not all in our hands, how so many factors beyond our
control !ive it direction, somethin! we are loath to admit today. (ur past has a stron! say
in makin! us what we are, in makin! our life what it is ) and that past includes our
parents6 past too. e carry on our shoulders the burden, and the honor, of their actions.
ust as our children will do those of ours.
In the spiritual interpretation of the -ahabharata, 9yasa6s four sons are embodiments of
the fourpurusharthas) !oals of human life. huka is the embodiment of the
paramapurushartha, of mo!sha, liberation* 9idura of dharma, ri!hteousness* and
Dhritarashtra of artha, wealth and possessiveness. 0andu, this interpretation tells us, is the
embodiment of !ama, desire. 1e is lust embodied.
Impotent !ama, perhaps.
(r maybe perhaps 9yasa wants to tell us that kama is always impotent in the ultimate
analysis, in spite of the fact all creation sprin!s from it.
Impotent kama, insatiable kama. $ama that can never !ive us ultimate contentment.
4a jAtu !Amah !AmAnAm upabhogena shAmyate,
ha"ishA !rishna"artme"a bhooya e"Abhi"ardhate.
ever indeed is kama satiated by the en&oyment of desired ob&ects* instead, like fire when
offerin!s are made into it, it keeps flarin! up.
;ntil impotent desire consumes the desirer himself.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
29/58
536un3/778-ore by : atya Ahaitanya" ee more at: http:www.bolo&i.cominde+.cfm?
mdJAontentKsdJ%rticlesK%[email protected]
This whole story is written by a dumb guy who has no !nowledge about the
glorious past of India. 0ow pay attention to these points here 1
;. Handhari had ;BB sons and a daughter. 0o matter what but a woman
canQt physically give birth to ;BB children in her lifetime. /nd age
di5erence between ;BB brothers was (ust a few hours. This fact clearly
shows that in ancient times people !new the technology of Test Tube
babies. in Mahabharata itQs clearly mentioned that ;BB children were born
in pots in a cave by the help of Dyasa. Therefore niyoga had nothing to dowith real se'. It was an act of ta!ing dna from woman and ma!e a test tube
baby.
. Handhari too! a vow to blindfold herself for whole life. 0ow this was not
forced on her, infact she too! this vow by her own will because she wanted
to live li!e her husband. 0ow living blindfolded is a very diRcult thing to do
but she did it. it shows that in ancient times people were very !ind, loyal
and honest. They used to stic! to their words unli!e nowadays wherepeople promise only to brea! it. "o this proves that heeshma didnQt brea!
his vow not because of he hated women or some other stupid reason.
bheeshma didnQt brea! his vow because that was a trend those days to
stic! to their words.
-
7/26/2019 Iravati Karve
30/58
the fact that there is indeed another science called spiritual science which
people have forgotten about and which needs to be re1e'plored.
"top demeaning the ancient India and accept the fact that ancient indian
people indeed were very advanced and they were smart too so they used
to hand over this !nowledge only to those with good character and moralvalues to avoid misuse of that !nowledge. they didnQt hand over their
sacred !nowledge to dumb assholes li!e nowadays every other country has
atom bombs and machine guns and we see so many wars.
"top thin!ing from your ass and open your narrow brain and only then you
will understand the history. These literature were not legendary stories
only, itQs real history. ?wari!a city of "hri Krishna has already been found
under the sea near gu(rat. "cientists have also recovered some gold coinsfrom the ruins of drowned city under ocean with printed $eacoc! feathers
on those coins so thatQs also proved that the !ing of that city indeed loved
peacoc! feathers. $retty soon more evidences will also be recovered. 1 "ee
more at) http)::www.bolo(i.com:inde'.cfm3
md2ontentUsd/rticlesU/rticleI?;V=Wsthash.%lollD7.dpuf
Krishna2A +tudy in ransformational 9eadershipby +atya haitanya
There is an old story about a sa!e who was sittin! serenely under a tree in the &un!le, lost
in the immense beauty of the world around him. The trees around him, the vines climbin!
on them, the birds perched on the trees and vines, the animals !ra/in! !ently amon! them
all, the placid