Download - LabReport Style Guide
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
1/76
1©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
STYLE GUIDEUNIT OPERATIONS/BIOPROCESS UNIT OPERATIONS:
ChBE 4200/4210
Summer 2016
Table of Contents
Background ...................................................................................................................... 2
Format, Font, and Word Limits ....................................................................................... 4
Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 5
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 8
Theory ............................................................................................................................ 11
Experimental Apparatus and Procedure ........................................................................ 14
Results and Discussion .................................................................................................. 17
Conclusions & Recommendations................................................................................. 21
References ..................................................................................................................... 24
Nomenclature................................................................................................................. 29
Appendices .................................................................................................................... 31
Lab Report Examples .................................................................................................... 32
Appendix A: Scientific Writing & Format Specs ......................................................... 47
Appendix B: In-Text Citations ..................................................................................... 53
Appendix C: Writing - Style & Grammar .................................................................... 54
Appendix D: Other Standard Writing Conventions ..................................................... 56
Appendix E: Tables and Figures ................................................................................... 64
Appendix F: Transitional Words and Phrases ............................................................... 69
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
2/76
2©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Background
As a chemical engineer, communicating the process and results of your experimental
work is as important as the work itself. In fact, if you do not share your process and results with
the larger community (i.e., your co-workers, your boss, your professional peers), the work itself
ceases to have value. A written lab report is one way of documenting and disseminating the
details of your research (oral reports are, of course, another). However, just “writing up” an
experiment is not adequate; the quality of the writing matters, as does the style of the prose and
the format and design of the report.
Although format and design specifics can vary from organization to organization within
the field of chemical engineering, this manual guides you through the specifics of formatting,
structuring, writing, and editing your lab reports for this course. It also offers some handy tips
for improving the overall quality of your prose.
Audience & Lab Reports (generally)
In telling any story, what you tell, as well as how much context and detail you include,
depends on who the listener is. For example, if you ask a friend to meet you at Tech Tower
before a football game, you do not have to describe what Tech Tower looks like and where it is if
your friend is a Tech student, but if he or she isn’t, you would need to include more detail and
direction. In writing your lab report, you need to consider such issues. Who would read a lab
report? Why? And how much do they already know about the subject?
In general, people would read a report such as the ones you will write because they may
find it necessary to undertake a similar study OR they may want to use your findings to help
make design or purchase decisions. Given this information, you can assume that your readers
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
3/76
3©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
have a basic understanding of general chemical engineering principles — for example, fluid,
mass, and heat transfer; thermodynamics; reactor design; process control; and so on. In short,
any individual with an average knowledge of chemical engineering concepts should be able to
read and understand your report without difficulty (Imagine a ChBE or other engineering
graduate or an MBA working in a ChBE industry). However, you should recall that even a
qualified chemical engineer may have forgotten the specifics of some area of this field. Thus,
you may need to remind them of some of the details or clarify the operation of specific units.
Rhetorical Context for ChBE 4200/4210 (your specific audience & purpose)
What is rhetorical context? It is simply the situation that surrounds your act of writing.
What are you writing? Why? For the purposes of this course, you are not a student when you
write your lab reports. Instead, you are to assume that you are an engineer working for a
company that has just purchased several experimental set-ups. Each set-up was designed to
measure the physical or chemical properties of a system or characterize a unit operation, reaction
process, or transport process. A manual of suggested experiments was provided. Your boss has
asked you to work in a team of three (or two) to evaluate the performance of each set-up by
conducting an experimental study in each over a range of specified conditions. You are then to
report back on the behavior of the system studied and analyze and characterize the phenomena as
directed by the lab manual. You should also convey the “bottom line,” or overall conclusion,
reached from your experiment(s), as well as one or two relevant recommendations.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
4/76
4©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Format, Font, and Word Limi ts
FORMAT: Two columns, justified, 1.5 line spacing, Page numbers at bottom center
FONT:Main text: 11 or 12 pt Times New Roman fontTable titles and figure captions: 10 pt Times New Roman
SECTIONS WORD LIMIT
( No title page — just put title page info at top of the first page — see the first Lab Report Example in the Style Guide for details.)( No table of contents)Abstract 275 words
Introduction 170 words
Theory 275 words
Apparatus and Procedure 150 words
Results & Discussion 550 words (no more than 4 tables or figures in R&D)Conclusions & Recommendations 160 words
(combined)References At least THREE outside references (not including Safety Data
Sheets [SDS] or lab manual) are required. Two-column formatrequired.
Nomenclature Nomenclature does not have to be in 2-column formatAppendix A: Title of Appendix Appendices do not have to be in 2-column formatAppendix B: Title of Appendix
(other appendices as needed)
Note: Word limits do NOT include table titles or figure captions.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
5/76
5©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Abstract
The Abstract is a focused summary of the report; it provides readers with a glimpse of the entire
report in a shortened form. In this, it is one of the most important parts. It helps a reader decide
whether to read, skim, or skip the document or to pass it along to others. To accomplish these
goals, the abstract must answer these questions:
- What was done, and why? ( should include one introductory sentence putting the
experiment and its field in perspective, thus motivating the study; a brief description
of apparatus; statement of objective(s); and a brief description of methods, including
range of conditions if appropriate)
- What were the results, and what conclusions were drawn from them? (includes
significant results with some level of quantification, comparison to theory/model
expectations, error analysis, and key conclusions)
Abstracts are typically single-paragraph discussions, and they stand completely alone.
This means they would be understandable even if published by themselves, as they often are in
databases of abstracts. Given this constraint, the abstract never specifically refers to any figure
or item in the report, but contains its own independent quantification of the results.
The first part of the abstract provides motivation for the study and gives the experimental
objectives as well as a brief overview of the apparatus and procedure. It should also mention any
critically important issues, such as any difficulties that prevented meaningful interpretation of
some of the results. The abstract should begin with an orienting sentence (one that provides
some perspective on the significance or motivation behind the work). This sentence should be
informative: a good opener clearly explains significance and motivates the study. Generic
sentences such as “Packed-bed absorption is important in chemical engineering” should be
avoided. A more effective example would give a specific feature or benefit that explains WHY
packed-bed absorption is important in a particular field or process. See sample reports for
examples.The second, and most important, part of the abstract discusses the results and conclusions
of the experiments. Appropriate levels of quantification vary depending on the experiment. For
example, if the goal of the lab was to determine one or two quantities, then these may be placed
in the abstract with their statistical confidence intervals. If several experiments are performed, a
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
6/76
6©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
general description of the observed trends in the data or of how the results compared to a model
or theory should be included. However, even this general description can be quantitative.
For example, phrases like “…the data were similar to the model.” should be avoided in place of
more quantitative phrases such as “… all data points were within 5% of the model predictions.”
or “…the root mean square average of the difference between the data points and the same points
predicted by the model was 7.4%.”. Finally, the abstract should end with one or two key
conclusions that indicate what was learned from the experiment and give the “bottom line.”
Generally, recommendations do not belong in the abstract.
* * Whi le thi s section provides a summary of the enti re report, i t cannot exceed 275 words.
Therefore, you must spend your words wisely and make sur e each one counts. Be sur e to
answer WHAT, WHY, HOW, and SO WHAT?. See abstracts in the Lab Report Examples or
in technical journals for examples.
Below is a good example of an abstract. (This example has 275 words.)
Abstract
A fin is a surface that extends from an object, creating additional surface area that
promotes heat transfer. One common application is in gas turbine engines, which often use pin
fin channels for internal cooling. In this experiment, three cylindrical pin fins were studied: two
aluminum fins of varying diameters and a stainless steel fin. The objective was to determine the
effects of fin geometry and composition on the heat transfer from the fin to its surroundings. A
mathematical model, based on Fourier’s law and energy balances, was evaluated by determining
the heat-transfer coefficient (h) of the two aluminum fins as well as the thermal conductivity (k)
of the stainless steel fin. The objective was accomplished by taking temperature readings as a
function of distance from a heat source. The convective heat transfer coefficients of the ½ in.
aluminum fin and the 1 in. aluminum fin were determined to be 13.43 2w
m k and 9.410 2w
m k ,
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
7/76
7©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
respectively, indicating h is inversely proportional to D. Using these h values, the k of the
stainless steel fin was calculated to be 16.79 mk
w
, which differed by 11.2% from the k value
reported in the literature for stainless steel. The 1 in. diameter aluminum fin transferred four
times more heat to the surroundings than the ½ in. diameter aluminum fin, indicating that greater
surface area increases heat transfer. Thermal conductivity of a material was also proportional to
the amount of heat transferred. Since the results generally agreed with expectations based on
theory, we concluded that Fourier’s law and energy balances accurately describe fins. The
11.2% error in calculation of thermal conductivity can be attributed to the assumption of
indefinitely long fins.
Note: you should use SI units throughout the whole report.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
8/76
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
9/76
9©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
distillation is very important in separating chemical substances” is generic because the term
“Fractional distillation” can be replaced by a variety of unit operations.
In the second paragraph, you need to:
o briefly describe the key physical and chemical characteristics of the
operation, focusing on those that are particularly relevant to your analysis;
o state your objective(s) clearly and thoroughly; and
o briefly indicate how you met those objectives.
If you used your first paragraph to lead subtly up to your objectives, this next paragraph should
come as no surprise to the reader. Make the wording of your objective as specific as
possible — and remember that a good objective must be measurable. (Hint: “the objective
was to characterize/study/observe the performance of [xxx apparatus]” is neither specific nor
measurable). Beware of copying the objective as stated in the lab manual — in most cases this isa general goal, and it is your job to whittle it down to a specific, measurable objective. You also
need to provide one or two sentences to very briefly describe the methods used to meet your
objective(s). You should NOT present any results in this section.
** Information in this section should be organized from general => specific, like an inverted
triangle. This section should be no more than 170 words long.
**The purpose of the Intro is to give perspective and background on why the objectives and the
study are important. In other words, it needs to motivate the study.
Below is a good example of an introduction.
Introduction (word count = 170)
In the chemical industry, distillation is often used to separate species with different
relative volatilities. However, when two liquid species have similar volatilities, distillation is not
feasible; instead, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) can be used for separation. LLE relies on
differing solubilities for separation1 and is particularly useful to separate petroleum products that
have different structures but similar volatilities.2 One limitation of LLE is that the columns
require a large number of stages to achieve an effective separation.3
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
10/76
10©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
The objective of this experiment was to investigate the effect of oscillation rate of a Karr
plate column on the separation of propionic acid from diesel fuel. Water was a suitable solvent to
use because the acid exited in the water stream, leaving the kerosene acid-free. To achieve the
objective, the column was run at four different oscillation rates. At each rate, the extract and
raffinate streams were titrated to determine acid concentration. These data were used to
determine the percentage of acid transferred to the water. Experimental results were then
compared to published correlations.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
11/76
11©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Theory
The Theory section presents the models (usually one or more equation/s) used to analyze
your experimental data. The purpose of this section is to lay out an interpretive model; it tells
your reader what theories and equations are important to interpret data from the experiment
(specifically, what theories and equations are being used). When you write this section, be sure
to move logically from one equation to the next — use transitional words and phrases.
Here are some key guidelines to follow in the theory section:
Because this section is devoted to theory, it is written in the PRESENT TENSE.
You should also avoid using the general “we” in this section, in the sense of
“we need to examine,” “Here, we can see,” and so forth.
As with the introduction and abstract, economy of prose dictates that obvious or
generic sentences should be avoided. Sentences like “In order to understand
reactive distillation, one must first understand the theory behind reactive
distillation” are generic and do not add value to the section.
Avoid repeating much of what is in the laboratory manual. Simply include
the important final equations, along with a clear yet concise explanation of the
main theory or model being used and any important assumptions or limitations.
Any additional equations that are needed should be detailed in an
appendix — be sure to reference (“call out”) this appendix in your main Theory
section.
If an equation only has a few terms, you can define them in the Theory section as well as
in the Nomenclature section. However, if your equation has more than three or four terms, you
might not have room to define them all in the Theory section. In this case, simply refer the reader
to the Nomenclature section for definition of all terms in the equations. Either way, you will
always need to have a Nomenclature section in each lab report.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
12/76
12©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
To achieve its purpose, the Theory section needs to
briefly clarify engineering concepts and show the development of the model include all assumptions, previous work that supports the model, and any limitations if they
are known.
cite sources (including the lab manual) for all equations.
The Theory section should NOT be a carbon copy of the lab manual. Your goal is toshow an understanding of the theory or model, not just to copy a bunch of equations.
The word limit for the Theory section is 275 words.
As for each section in the lab, this section should begin with a sentence that lends perspective
to the Theory section relative to the lab report as a whole. This opening matter should be as
specific and informative as possible. Do NOT use generic statements such as “In order to
understand this lab, it is necessary to understand the theory behind it.”
Here is an example of a good opening passage for the Theory section:
Many processes that involve phase changes, such as evaporative cooling, are governed
by the balance between the heat loss due to evaporation and the convective heating caused by
the evaporative cooling. This experiment studies this balance in the evaporative cooling of water
on a copper cylinder. The energy balance for such a process is written as…..
Final note: If you took any equations from the lab manual or any other source, be sure to
include an in-text citation and a corresponding entry in your References. Failure to do so may
constitute plagiarism.
THEORY – (good example — about 268 words)
The steady-state temperature of the gauze-covered copper cylinder is governed by the
balance of evaporative cooling and convective heating. This energy balance is written as
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
13/76
13©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
vair
xair H x
x-x Ak -T T hA
dt
dT C M ˆ
1
(1)
The term on the left-hand side is the net energy accumulation of the system, and the left and right
terms on the right-hand side are the convective heating and evaporative cooling, respectively.
The specific terms in all equations are defined in the Nomenclature section.
Assuming that the heat capacity of gauze is equal to that of water, all parameters are
constant with temperature, the interfacial mole fraction of water is at its equilibrium value, and
the temperature variations in the rod are negligible, Equation 1 is integrated to obtain the transient
energy balance, Equation 2:
t C D
h
T T
T T
ccciair
air
4ln
(2)
The value of h determined from Equation 2 is then used to estimate the mass transfer coefficient
by invoking the Chilton – Colburn analogy between heat and mass transfer.3
Once the heat and mass transfer coefficients are determined, the other constants in
Equation 2 are determined by direct measurement or obtained from the literature. Finding theseconstants allows Equation 1 to be numerically integrated to obtain a model of the transient mass
and energy transfer. Raoult’s law and the Antoine equation for vapor pressure are used to
determine this equilibrium value of the water fraction at the interface.
Finally, the steady-state value from this model is obtained by setting the left-hand side of
Equation 1 to zero. This steady-state temperature should be comparable to the wet bulb
temperature, which can be determined from a psychometric chart for the conditions of
temperature and humidity in the surrounding air.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
14/76
14©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Experimental Apparatus and Procedure
This section describes the apparatus you used to conduct the experiment and explains
how you used the equipment to do the experiment. This section can be broken down into two
main paragraphs: description of apparatus, and description of procedure and key safety issues.Please note: The entire Apparatus and Procedure section should not exceed 150 words. You
should use SI units through the whole report.
Paragraph 1:
Description of the apparatus. Give a BRIEF, general description, no more than one short
paragraph in length.
Verb Tense for Apparatus Description:
Description of apparatus can be in either PRESENT or PAST tense, depending on
the context.
Example of apparatus description: (92 words)
In this experiment, we used a countercurrent Karr column with reciprocating sieve plates.
The column was 1 in. in diameter and 6 ft in length, and each end of the column had a 2-in.
diameter disengagement section. The water and diesel were pumped from storage tanks through
calibrated flowmeters. A needle valve was used to maintain a constant interface between the
organic and aqueous phases. The extract flowed from the bottom of the column while the
raffinate flowed from the top of the column. Figure 2A in Appendix A details the apparatus.
Note: You must include a clearly labeled schematic diagram of the apparatus (or therelevant portion thereof) in this section, or in the appendix (but you need to call out theappendix). You may use a photo of the lab equipment to supplement, but not replace, thediagram! Be sure to include a citation for the picture or diagram, even if it is from the labmanual.
Paragraph 2: References the procedure and describes key safety issues.
This paragraph should begin with some version of this sentence: The experimental
procedure was taken from the UO Lab Manual1 and followed without any deviations / followed
with the exception of several deviations. Be sure to reference the lab manual. If there were any
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
15/76
15©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
significant deviations, those should be described next. You should also include any key variables
not specified in the lab manual, such as the experimental conditions used, flow rates, space time,
and so on. Finally, any relevant safety issues should be briefly discussed, and you should cite the
SDS for any chemicals you used in the experiment. You also must include a sentence
referencing standard safety protocol — see the example below. (NOTE: the SDS references do
not count towards the requirement for three outside references!)
Verb Tense for Procedure Description:
Procedure description should be mainly past tense, with the possibility of present
tense when discussing chemical hazards, etc.
Experimental Apparatus and Procedure (good example)
(Note: the main goal was to investigate a process of mass and convective heat transfer occurring simultaneously)
The equipment for the simultaneous heat and mass transfer experiment consisted of a
stand outfitted with a clamp placed in front of a small wind tunnel. Other equipment included a
bare copper cylinder, a gauze-wrapped copper cylinder with a smaller diameter, a thermocouple,
a stopwatch, an ice water bath, and a room-temperature water bath. The copper cylinders had
small holes in the end where the probe of the thermocouple was placed. The experimentalapparatus is shown in Figure 1.
[Figure 1. Diagram of apparatus goes here, or in an appendix (must call out the appendix).
Remember to include citation at the end of the caption if taken from an outside source, including
the lab manual!]
To meet the experimental objective, we followed the procedure as outlined in the UO Lab
Manual1 but with several deviations:
(describe first deviation)
(describe second deviation)
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
16/76
16©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
(etc., etc.)
This experiment presented no significant safety hazards, and no chemicals were used. Standard
safety protocol, including the use of safety glasses, closed-toe shoes, lab coats, and gloves, was
followed.
Note: For a lab in which chemicals are used, the safety paragraph should follow the basic
structure below:
The main safety concerns in this experiment were that sodium hydroxide is a strong base and is
corrosive, and ethyl acetate is flammable.2 For other potential chemical hazards, refer to the
safety data sheets (SDS) listed in the References section.3,4 Standard safety protocol, including
the use of safety glasses, closed-toe shoes, lab coats, and gloves, was followed.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
17/76
17©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Resul ts and Discussion
The purpose of this section is to convey what you found in doing the experiment and to
explain the significance of those findings. This section also compares the results you obtained
with those you expected (per theory or literature). It also explains error — it should discuss the
source of errors and should also quantify and characterize their impact on the experiment. To
reach these goals, this section needs to:
present and explain your results in a clear, well-organized, and concise manner
(use figures and tables to present information efficiently; make sure that you
provide all results that are requested in the lab manual, as well as any others that
you feel are appropriate and relevant); and
discuss and analyze the significance of those results, including how they relate
and compare to your theory/model, sources of error, and the effect those errors
had on the experimental results.
Organizing information in the Results and Discussion section can be tricky. Generally,
you begin by briefly summarizing your overall goal (or the first part of it) and briefly reviewing
the first step of the experiment. Then, you may wish to present a figure or table of the raw data
(or a typical subset) to convey information about scatter, the range over which data were taken,magnitudes, and so on. However, please avoid large tables with tons of data — these are best
placed in the appendix, not here. Then, you break this information into its significant component
parts and focus on each part individually. Your discussion/analysis should occur at the same
time. The section may conclude with some discussion of err or to clarify the “big picture”
(although it often makes more sense to discuss error as you go along). For example, if you find
that your results generally are not what you expected — or are not ideal — you must discuss the
discrepancies. What could account for them? What caused you to suspect these sources? How
exactly did these discrepancies affect your results? Provide evidence to support your claims,
quantify the impact of various sources of error, and characterize the impact of any erroneous
assumptions.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
18/76
18©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
In working through each part of your data, each figure or table must be briefly introduced
before the reader sees it (e.g., “Table II shows the relationship between time and temperature.”).
After presenting the figure or table, it must then be explained--point out significant features or
trends; tell your readers what you want them to see in the figure or table (e.g., “Figur e 4 shows
that as time increased, temperature decreased.”) and discuss the trends that are shown. If you fit
your curve to a specific subset of your data points, explain your reasoning. Also, indicate your
reasoning behind any corrected data.
You are limited to no more than FOUR tables and figures (total) in the Results &
Discussion section. We do want you to use tables and figures (usually, you should have at least
two in this section), but we don’t want you to go overboard in such a short report. The trick is to
decide which tables and figures do the best job of illustrating the key points you wish to convey.All other relevant tables and figures may be placed in an appendix and called out in the main
text.
Finally, you need to discuss the importance of your findings — both generally AND in
relation to your theory or model (e.g., “The reciprocal relationship between time and temperature
reveals . . .This relationship between time and temperature was expected based on…. It shows .
. .”). Be sure to discuss any specific error and the effect that such error might have had on the
particular part of the data on which you are focusing. Quantifying the impact of error on your
results is quite helpful to the reader as well.
Use significant figures in all of your results (to review the conventions of significant
figures, see Felder and Rousseau, 2000). You should know how precise your data are; the
significant figures must reflect the precision of the data. Also, in reporting the average of
repeated data, include the confidence interval, and where possible apply propagation of error
analysis. You should use SI units through the whole report.
Note: Before you can write the Results and Discussion section, you must complete the sample
calculations (include in an appendix). You will need to mention any data that were rejected in
the calculations and any data that may be erroneous. However, you do not want to inundate
readers with numbers and figures; rather, escort them carefully through the logic of the
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
19/76
19©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
calculations. It is much easier to grade a report that presents sample calculations clearly,
thoroughly, and logically.
Here are examples of opening sentences for the Results and Discussion section:
To determine the effect of horsepower on the performance of the laboratory pump, thefirst step was…
The first experimental objective was to calculate the oxygen permeance and
oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of the membrane; to meet this objective, …
Again, the general format of this section is as follows:
1 - To determine ……, we measured / calculated / etc. …
2 - Figure 1 below illustrates the relationship between….
3 - [Insert Figure 1]
4 - As Figure 1 shows,…
5 - These results suggest/indicate that…
6- The results were expected per theory/model, OR, the results were unexpected, and
here’s what we think caused the discrepancy
You will follow this general format for each result you present.
Again, you should thoroughly analyze and explain your results, possible sources of error,
the degree of confidence, and the implication of your observations. Even if your results are poor,if you can explain them well and account for discrepancies, you can still get a good grade.
Conversely, good results, particularly if presented poorly, do not guarantee a good grade.
Transitions
The skillful use of transitional words, phrases, and sentences will make the difference
between a report that is easy to follow and a report that is not. Thus, you should try to lead your
reader through the discussion of results with sentences like “After determining that flow rate
increased with….., we next analyzed the relationship between…”…. For example:
Once the heat transfer coefficient was calculated, the next step in creating a model forthe simultaneous heat and mass transfer cooling of a copper rod was to determine the mass-transfer coefficient. This determination was accomplished by…..
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
20/76
20©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Determining the mass transfer coefficient provided the data necessary to formulate amodel of the cooling process seen in Figure 3. To derive the model, …
After deriving the model, we then compared the model with our experimental data.Figure 5 shows this comparison.
** These transitions make reading through the analysis and discussion of the results mucheasier. They are like road signs telling you where you’ve been, where you are , and where you’re
going, and how the individual results are related to and build upon each other.
**See Appendix F: Transitional Words and Phrases for examples of transitions.
The length of the Results and Discussion section will vary per experiment (aim for around 450-550 words). It should be the longest and richest section of the report.
In Results & Discussion, you should keep procedural and calculation details to a minimum as
much as possible. The main focus should be on your results and what they mean — spending
more time on the most important results. You can also use appendices to explain how you
calculated certain values — just be sure to “call out” the appendix in the main body of the report.
Please see Lab Report Examples for good examples of Results & Discussion.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
21/76
21©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Conclusions & Recommendations
The Conclusions & Recommendations section presents a final assessment of the
experiment and results. The purpose of this section is to give your reader a final, broader sense
of the experiment and its success or problems. Here, you are presenting “bottom-line”conclusions that are supported by your results and analysis. Ultimately, how well did the
experiment perform? Did the results compare well with expected or ideal results? How reliable
were your data? In this section, keep your rhetorical context in mind. What would you want to
tell your boss about this particular experimental set-up? Is it a good one? Should it be returned?
Will it save the company time or money? Remember, the goal here is to state conclusions
based on your key results and to provide a broader context, NOT to simply repeat your
results! No brand new results should be presented in this section. In other words, don’t “save”
results for this section, and don’t bring ideas up out of the blue.
The final sentence of your Conclusions paragraph should address the “big picture”— it should
answer the question “so what?” about your results. Why would these results be relevant or
applicable to industry? This “overall conclusion” is something that could also appear in your
abstract, but would not be mentioned explicitly in any other section. It should, however, flow
naturally from the results that you obtained. You may also try to link this “overall conclusion” to
the motivation that you brought up in the Introduction, thus “closing the circle.”
You should also include two or three relevant recommendations in this section. These may offer
relevant, non-generic suggestions for improving the experimental set-up or procedure, as well as
suggesting what the next stage of experimentation might be. For example, statements like “we
recommend XX repetitions of the entire experiment XX for greater statistical accuracy” are too
generic and therefore not suitable as recommendations. On the other hand, it is appropriate to
identify specific aspects of the experiments where improvements would be particularly beneficial
(e.g., “Use of a digital thermometer with more accurate temperature readings in the outlet
stream of the heat exchanger would enable more precise determination of the heat transfer
coefficient.”).
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
22/76
22©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
For example:
This experiment was successful in showing that efficiency of a laboratory centrifugal
pump was directly related to…. We discovered that…..The data demonstrated internal
consistency since…….. Furthermore, the data were shown to be accurate based
on……However, a calibration error caused…..Overall, the experiment indicated that this pump
would / would not be useful in an industrial process with ….requirements.
For the future, we recommend improving this experiment by…..An additional
recommendation to reduce error is to….
** What did you find? What did you learn? What are the sources of error? Degree of
confidence? What are the implications of your observations? What’s your OVERALL
conclusion? Don’t forget to provide evidence (quanti tative, if possible) for your claims
** In this section, you should draw conclusions based on key resul ts . What did you learn from
this experiment and, more specifically, these results regarding this process / mechanism?
*Aim for around 160 words for your Conclusions & Recommendations section.
Below is a good example of a Conclusions & Recommendations section.
Conclusions & Recommendations (about 160 words)
In this experiment, the effect of oscillation rate on the separation of propionic acid and
diesel through liquid-liquid extraction was successfully determined. The percent of propionic
acid removed increased with increasing plate oscillation rate, despite discrepancies in the mass
balance equations. Increases in the oscillation rates also correlated directly with the number of
equilibrium stages. Additionally, as the oscillation rate increased, the HETP and H0y values
decreased. However, experimental trends did not agree with published correlations because of
differences in operating conditions. Overall, results indicated that higher oscillation rates in an
industrial LLE process would increase mass transfer.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
23/76
23©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Recommendations for this lab include allowing longer trial durations to ensure steady
state operation is maintained, as well as performing the experiment at higher oscillation rates to
determine an optimal rate for mass transfer efficiency. Additionally, a device that could
mechanically count and report the oscillation rate of the column would greatly reduce the human
error involved in counting items moving at such a great velocity.
Brief note about recommendations: * * Be careful of “whining” or sounding too
student-y (remember your rhetorical situation). You should not complain about the TA, or about
directions in the lab manual or problems you had doing the experiment because of the directions,
or about the experiment taking too long. Instead, offer your colleagues recommendations for
doing the experiment more efficiently or safely so as to achieve more accurate or conclusive
results. You can also suggest other methods of experimentation or analysis for the future, as
long as you tell us why you’re making the suggestion. As always, avoid generic and vague
statements.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
24/76
24©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
References
Because good research is a key part of any report, it is required that you include at least THREE
outside references in your report (i.e., references other than the lab manual and SDS). The SDS
websites should be cited in the Procedure section and included as references in your References
section, but they do NOT count towards this requirement. These outside references may include
textbooks, journal articles, books, online scholarly articles, academic websites, and so on. Just
make sure that you cite them properly, both within the text and in the References section. Citing
Wikipedia or About.com (or other such encyclopedic, non-peer-reviewed sites) is NOT
permitted. However, Wikipedia can be an excellent starting point in finding more credible
sources.
In this class, we will follow the ACS Reference style as explained in detail in The ACS
Style Guide (3rd
edition). In organizing the information in the References section, please use the
following “templates” to organize and punctuate the standard bibliographic information. If some
standard information is not available (e.g., an author), you should omit that category (see
examples under “Article in an anthology,” which has no author , and “On-line Article or Web
Site,” which has no author).
Note that each reference entry should end with a period.
Number your entries in the order in which they are first cited in the text.
The entire list of references should be in two-column format, and should have 1.5 line spacing
(see examples below).
For a book written or edited by one or more persons:
First author’s last name, first and middle initials; second author’s last name, first and middle
initials; etc. Title of Book, ed number .; Editor 1, Editor 2, Eds. (if an edited book); Publisher:
Place of Publication, Year; Page number(s) used.
EX.Coulson, J.M.; Richardson, J.F. Chemical Engineering , 4th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2005; p 34.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bk-2006-STYG.ch014http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bk-2006-STYG.ch014http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bk-2006-STYG.ch014http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/isbn/9780841239999http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bk-2006-STYG.ch014
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
25/76
25©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
OR (for multiple pages):
Coulson, J.M.; Richardson, J.F. Chemical Engineering , 4th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2005; pp 1; 7;34.
OR (for a page range):
Coulson, J.M.; Richardson, J.F. Chemical Engineering , 4th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2005; pp 34-40.
NOTE: if authored by more than one person, list names in the order in which the names appear
on the book’s title page. Names of authors and editors should be listed as last name, first and
middle initials (skip the middle initial if not provided). Authors’ names are separated by a semi-
colon. Editors’ names are separated by commas. Be sure to include each author or editor, even if
there are more than three. For an article in an anthology/book ( note that the UO lab manual is considered to be an
anthology):
Author’s last name, first and middle initials. Title of Article. In Title of Book , edition number (if
there is one); Publishing company: Place of publication, Year; Volume number, page number(s).
EX.Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactors. In Unit Operations Lab Manual ; Georgia Tech: Atlanta, GA,
2016; p 4.
Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactors. In Unit Operations Lab Manual ; Georgia Tech: Atlanta, GA,
2016; pp 4-6.
*Note that in the above examples, no author was listed for the article; therefore, this part of the
entry is omitted. Any time you cite the lab manual, you omit the author’s name.
For an article in a journal:
First author’s last name, first initial and middle initial; second author’s last name, first and
middle initials; etc. Title of Article. Journal Title (or Abbreviation) Year , Volume (Issue number
or Month and date) , Inclusive Pagination.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
26/76
26©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
(The journal title should be italicized and may contain approved library abbreviations. When in
doubt, use the full journal title. The year should be in bold. The volume number should be in
italics.)
EX.Taveira, P.; Cruz, P.; Mendes, A. A Maxwell-Stefan Experiment. Chem. Eng. Educ. 2000
34 (1), 90-93.
For a general web site:(although your source may not offer all of the following, include as much as possible.)
First author’s last name, first and middle initials; second author’s last name, first and middle
initials; etc. Title of Article/Document. Title of Site. URL (accessed Month, Day, Year), other
identifying information, if any.
For title of site, use the title found on the Web site itself. Add the words “Home Page” for
clarification when needed.
EX.Smith, J.S; Floating Point Unit Operations. MIPS Technologies, Inc.
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi/ hdwr/bks/SGI_Developer/books/
R10K_UM/sgi_html/t5.Ver.2.0.book_313.html (accessed June 10, 2016).
For a document retrieved from an agency or university web site:
First author’s last name, first and middle initials; second author’s last name, first and middle
initials; etc. Title of Document, Year. Title of Site. URL (accessed Month, Day, Year), other
identifying information, if any.
If an article is contained within a large and complex Web site, such as that for a university orgovernment agency, the host organization and the relevant program or department should be
identified BEFORE giving the URL and access date.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
27/76
27©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
EX.
Technology integration and publishing, 2001. Columbia University for Learning Technologies.
http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/tech-and-pub-past-projects/ (accessed June 10, 2016).
For PowerPoint slides or handouts from a class or presentation:
Presenter ’s last name, first and middle initials. Title of Presentation. Presented in
Course/Conference Title, Place, Date.
EX.
Henderson, C. Statistical Modeling. Presented in ChBE 2120, Georgia Tech, May 25, 2014.
Jones, J.M. Developments in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Presented at the 10th International
Conference on Drug Delivery, Montreal, Canada, June 12, 2012.
For your own lecture notes from a course:
Instructor’s last name, first initial. Course title lecture. Place, Date.
EX:Breedveld, V. ChBE 3200 lecture. Georgia Tech, May 15, 2013.
In-text Citations
For information on citing material within the text, please see Appendix B of the Style Guide.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
28/76
28©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Sample References section
Number your references in the order
in which they are first cited in the text.
Please use 1.5 line spacing.
1. Taveira, P.; Cruz, P.; Mendes, A. A
Maxwell-Stefan Experiment. Chem.
Eng. Educ. 2000 34 (1), 90-93.
2. Geankoplis, C.J. Transport Processes
and Unit Operations, 3rd ed.; PTR
Prentice Hall: Princeton, NJ, 2003; pp
27-30.
3. Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactors. In
Unit Operations Lab Manual ; Georgia
Tech: Atlanta, GA, 2016; p 4.
4. Floating Point Unit Operations. MIPS
Technologies, Inc.
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-
bin/getdoc.cgi/hdwr/bks/SGI_Developer
/books/R10K_UM/sgi_html/t5.Ver.2.0.b
ook_313.html (accessed June 4, 2016).
5. Felder, R.; Rousseau, R.W. Elementary
Principles of Chemical Processes, 3rd
ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York,
2000; pp 4, 21.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
29/76
29©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Nomenclature
The Nomenclature section provides a “key” to the symbols and units used in the lab report.
Please note that SI units should be used here, as well as throughout the report.
Items should be listed in alphabetical order, putting all English symbols first, then Greek.
Note: EVERY report MUST have a Nomenclature section (even the Gummy Bear report!)
The Nomenclature section does not need to be written in 2-column format.
Sample Nomenclature
Symbol Definition Units
A surface area m2
C pair heat capacity of air J/kg/K
C pc heat capacity of copper J/kg/K
C pw heat capacity of water J/kg/K
DAB diffusivity of an air water system m2/s
Eacc energy accumulated in a system J
Eg energy generated in a system J
Ein energy entering a system J
Eout energy leaving a system Jh convective heat transfer coefficient W/K/m2
Hfg mole heat of vaporization of water J/kg
Jix molal flux relative to molal average velocity -
K air thermal conductivity of air W/K/m2
K c thermal conductivity of copper W/K/m2
K w thermal conductivity of water W/K/m2
Lc Length of copper cylinder m
M molecular weight g/mol
N pr Prandtl number -
Nsc Schmidt number -
Nw molal flux of water relative to stationary coordinates J/m2/s
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
30/76
30©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
P atmospheric pressure mmHg
pw partial pressure of water mmHg
Pw vapor pressure of water mmHg
T temperature of cylinder at time t oC
TAir air temperatureoC
Tdb dry bulb temperatureoC
T1 initial temperature of copperoC
U molal average velocity -
V volume m2
x mole fraction of water vapor at surface of gauze -
xAir mole fraction of water vapor in room air -
yAir mole fraction of air -ρc density of copper kg/m
3
ρw density of water kg/m3
μair viscosity of air kg/m/s
μw viscosity of water kg/m/s
Δx characteristic length m
Δxw concentration gradient -
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
31/76
31©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Appendices
The Appendices include the following:
Complete sample calculations with tables of intermediate results. Since only the finalcalculations are included in the body of the report, the intermediate and samplecalculations must be detailed enough for the grader to check for errors . They must beadequately introduced and explained by text so that the grader can easily understand them.Equations should be referenced to the Theory section or literature. Physical and chemical properties used in the calculations should be referenced to literature. Units should always beincluded and conversions shown. The calculations may be neatly handwritten in ink .You must cite every source from which equations/literature data were drawn.Appendices do NOT need to be written in 2-column format.
NOTE: Even if spreadsheet calculations are attached, you must include
handwritten sample calculations to show how each column/row of the spreadsheetwas obtained. Be sure to define each column and row of the spreadsheet, as wellas the units.
Sample Calculation Rules:
a. Arrange them in a logical order. b. Define all terms.c. Show all units/unit balances and conversions.d. Lead the reader through the work by putting a sentence or two preceding each
calculation explaining what is being done. Work that is easily understood ismore easily graded.
e. Use one set of conditions, wherever possible, to show the logical progression
of the calculations.f. Any equation used from the Theory section of the lab manual must be cited.g. Any data from the literature must be cited.h. Any data table generated by computer calculations must be briefly explained.i. Numerical values should have the correct number of significant digits (less
than 4) even for the spreadsheet calculations.
A photocopy or scan of your original data sheet(s), signed by either the TA or the labcoordinator, is to be included as an appendix (called Raw Data) in your lab report. Nochanges should be made to the original data sheet once the lab session is complete.
Any other pertinent information that does not belong in the body of the report (such as long
derivations or supplemental figures and tables) can be included as an appendix. Each appendix should start on a NEW page.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
32/76
32©2016 School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology
Lab Report Examples
What follows are two examples you may use when developing your lab report. Note that these
are not perfect examples; their purpose is to provide general guidelines as to the proper
organization and style of a lab report.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
33/76
33
CHBE 4200 – Unit OperationsDr. Yonathan Thio – Ms. Jacqueline Snedeker
Lab 5: Liquid-Liquid ExtractionGroup 1: Hillary Clinton, *John Kerry, and Donald Trump
Date Performed: June 7, 2016 – Date Submitted: June 13, 2016
ABSTRACT
Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is
important in separations where distillation is
unfeasible due to low volatility differences.
The objective of this experiment was to
investigate the performance of a Karr
reciprocating plate extraction column for
separating propionic acid from diesel using
water as a solvent. This objective was
achieved by performing mass balances and
exploring the effects of plate oscillation rate
on mass transfer efficiency. A 0.02 M
solution of NaOH was used to titrate the
extract and raffinate at three different
frequencies (144, 174, and 210 min-1) to
obtain the fraction of propionic acid in each
stream. The percent of propionic acid
removed through the extract was calculated
for each frequency as 71.9, 73.0, and 79.4%
for 144, 174, and 210 min-1, respectively.
This increasing trend was due to higher
oscillation rates that generated more surface
area for mass transfer. The number of
equilibrium stages (N) was then calculated
using the Kremser equation as 0.569, 0.659,
and 0.908 for 144, 174, and 210 min-1,
respectively, indicating higher oscillation
rates resulted in a better separation. Based
on these N values, the height equivalent to a
transfer plate (HETP) values were calculated
as 321, 278, and 201 cm, for 144, 174, and
210 min-1, respectively. When these
numbers were compared to HETP values
from Bensalem and Tawfik correlations, a
significant amount of discrepancy was
evident. This error can be attributed to the
correlations being derived from systemscomposed of different compounds than
those used in this experiment. Finally, the
mass transfer coefficients were found to
increase with increasing oscillation rate.
These results again showed improved mass
transfer efficiency with at higher oscillation
rates.
INTRODUCTIONLiquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is an
important method for separating compounds
of similar volatility and boiling points that is
commonly used in the production of
petroleum and organic solvents.
Additionally, no phase change occurs during
LLE, making it preferable when a mixture’s
components are temperature sensitive.
The objective of this experiment was to
characterize and investigate the performance
of a Karr reciprocating plate extraction
column for separating propionic acid from
diesel using water as a solvent. This
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
34/76
34
objective was achieved by performing mass
balances and exploring the effects of plate
oscillation rate on mass transfer efficiency.
Flow and composition samples were taken
from the raffinate and extract under the
varying oscillation rates. Each sample was
then titrated to yield the degree of separation
achieved, which allowed height equivalent
to a transfer plate (HETP) to be calculated.
These values along with height of an overall
raffinate transfer unit values allowed the
relative mass transfer efficiency to be
calculated for each trial.
THEORY
In this experiment, a dilute system with
low solubility between the diesel fuel and
water exists; therefore, the operating and
equilibrium lines are assumed to be linear.
This linearity allows for continuous contact
behavior.For the operation, a variation of the
Kremser equation that operates under the
assumption of linear operating and
equilibrium lines can be used to calculate
the number of stages:1
N
ln yb yb
*
ya ya*
ln yb ya
yb* ya
*
(1)
where N is the number of equilibrium
stages, and the compositions are shown in
Figure 1 below.
Figure 1. Extraction column analysis.2
The mass transfer rate between the two
fluids is determined by the absorption factor,
A:
A L
mV yb ya yb
* ya*
(2)
This equation represents a ratio of the slope
of the operating line to the slope of the
equilibrium line. If these lines are linear,then the water flow rate, L; diesel flow rate,
V; and equilibrium factor, m, are all
considered constant.1
Due to the difference between propionic
acid’s solubility in water and diesel, the
continuous contact mass transfer is
expressed in terms of an overall mass
transfer coefficient, which is based on thecompositions in the raffinate phase and the
corresponding height of a transfer unit:
Z H 0 y N 0 y (3)
where Z is the height of the column, and
0 is the height of an equivalent raffinate
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
35/76
35
transfer unit.1 This height is described by
the following equation:
H 0 y
V
K ya (4)
whereV
K ya represents the height of a
transfer unit (HTU).1 K ya is the overall
mass transfer coefficient, and
N 0 y
A
A 1ln
yb ya
A 1 1
A
(5)
Substituting Equation 4 into Equation 3
yields
Z V
K ya N
0 y (6)
A correlation found by Bensalem can be
used to calculate the height equivalent to a
theoretical plate,
HETP 24.3 Af 0.81
U c0.21
U d 0.7
0.3
(7)
where A is the amplitude of the
reciprocating cycle, f is the reciprocating
frequency, Uc and Ud are the superficial
velocities of continuous or dispersed phases,
and φ is the holdup of the dispersed phase in
the column.1 A second correlation was
discovered by Tawfik, where HETP is
described as1
HETP Af 1.15 U c U d 0.235
(8)
APPARATUS & PROCEDURE
The experimental apparatus used in this
procedure consisted of a 1 in. in diameter by
6 ft long Karr reciprocating plate extraction
column with a variable speed motor, two
feed pumps, and two calibrated flowmeters.
A diagram of the apparatus is shown in
Figure 2.
Figure 2. LLE apparatus schematic.1
A 250 mL graduated cylinder and burette
were used to collect and titrate samples. The
procedure was taken from the UnitOperations Lab Manual1 and performed with
the following deviation: Three oscillation
rates were tested rather than four.
Flow rate and composition data
were used to determine the HTU and mass
transfer coefficient for each operating
condition. Diesel is combustible, so care was
taken to prevent ignition. Additionally, propionic acid and diesel are both irritants,
so direct contact with skin and eyes was
avoided.2 Standard safety protocol,
including the use of safety goggles, closed-
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
36/76
36
toe shoes, lab coats, and gloves, was
employed.
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The objective of this experiment was to
determine how oscillation rate affected the
performance of a Karr reciprocating plate
extraction column by calculating the percent
acid removed, the number of required
equilibrium plates, and the mass transfer
coefficients. Three oscillation rates (144,
174, and 210 min-1) were observed, with
composition and flow samples from the
extract and raffinate taken at each. The
samples were titrated with NaOH to
determine the propionic acid content. The
diesel and water inlet flow rates were held
constant throughout the experiment, while
the raffinate and extract flow rates were
measured using a stop watch for three trials
(Appendix A). Table I shows the propionic
acid content in each stream.
Table I. Material Balance Closure and PercentPropionic Acid Removed.
The material balances do not equate,
as the amount in should equal the amount
out. Inaccuracies in the flowmeters and
difficulties in titrations are likely sources of
this discrepancy. This inequality may also
be due to unsteady-state operation of the
column. The percent propionic acid removed
increased with increased plate oscillation
rate. This trend was caused by higher
oscillation rates creating more surface area
for mass transfer to occur.
The number of equilibrium stages, N, for
the separation was then determined for each
trial. Titration data were used to find x b, the
fraction of the propionic acid in the extract,
and ya, the fraction of the propionic acid in
the raffinate (see Appendix A for
calculations). Resulting operating lines were plotted along with equilibrium data as
shown in Figure 3 (Appendix B contains
raw equilibrium data). Diesel typically
consists of 65% aliphatic and 35% aromatic
compounds3 with molecular weights ranging
from 140 to 165 g/mol. In this lab, diesel
was modeled in ASPEN as a mixture of 30
wt% heptane, 35 wt% octane, and 35 wt% benzene.
Figure 3. Experimental operating lines fordifferent oscillation rates and an equilibrium linefor a propionic acid-diesel system.
Freq(min-1)
Feed(g/min)
Extract(g/min)
Raff(g/min)
PercentRemoved
144 0.877 0.141 0.0546 71.9%
174 0.877 0.0162 0.00599 73.0%
210 0.877 0.0557 0.0144 79.4%
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
37/76
37
By evaluating the equilibrium lines
at each xa and x b values, values for ya* and
y b* were obtained. The number of
equilibrium plates (N) was calculated for
each trial using a version of Kremser
equation. The resulting N values were 0.569,
0.660, and 0.908 for frequencies of 144,
174, and 210 min-1, respectively (Appendix
C contains calculations). The number of
equilibrium stages increases with the
increasing oscillation. This correlation arose
because higher oscillation rates result in a
better separation.The equilibrium number of stages
for each trial was then used to obtain values
for the HETP, and these values were
compared against HETP values from
different correlations (Appendix D). The
HETP values were plotted against
oscillation rate as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. HETP values from continuous,Bensalem, and Tawfik correlation methods.
The HETP decreases with increasing
oscillation frequency because the
equilibrium number of stages increases
while the column height remains unchanged,
resulting in a smaller transfer unit height.
The trends for the Bensalem and Tawfik
correlations correspond with theory, yet
there is a large degree of difference between
all three methods. This discrepancy could
originate because the correlations were
derived for systems that were different than
the system used in this experiment.
The heights of an overall raffinatetransfer unit, H0y, were then calculated and
used to obtain mass transfer coefficients for
each trial. N0y values were calculated and
H0y and K ya values were related using
Equation 4 (see Appendix E for these
calculations). Figure 5 shows the
relationship between the mass transfer
coefficient and oscillation rate.
Figure 5. Mass transfer coefficients plottedagainst plate oscillation rate on a log-log scale.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
38/76
38
As Figure 5 shows, there is a degree of
correlation between the mass transfer
coefficient and the plate oscillation rate, as
seen before in other parameters. These
results indicate that the mass transfer
coefficient for the separation increases with
increasing plate oscillation rate.
CONCLUSIONS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
In this experiment, the separation of
propionic acid and diesel through liquid-
liquid extraction was successfully
characterized. The percentage of propionic
acid removed was shown to increase with
increasing plate oscillation rate, despite
discrepancies in the mass balance equations.
Increases in the oscillation rates also
correlated directly with the number of
equilibrium stages. Additionally, as theoscillation rate increased, the HETP, N0y,
and H0y values decreased. Taken together,
these observations indicated that larger
oscillation rates in industry could result in
better mass transfer.
Recommendations for this lab include
allowing longer trial durations to ensure
steady-state operation is maintained as well
as performing the experiment at more
oscillation rates to increase the validity of
observed trends. Additionally, a device thatcould mechanically count and report the
oscillation rate of the column would greatly
reduce the human error involved in counting
items moving at such a great velocity.
REFERENCES (Should have two more
refs)
1. Liquid-Liquid Extraction. In Unit
Operations Lab Manual ; Georgia
Tech: Atlanta, GA, 2011; p 1-11.
2. “Chemical Information - Safety
Data Sheets
SDS),” ”, Environment Safety and
Health Online, 2010 (Observed
November 2011).
3. Ott, L., & Bruno, T. Variability of
Biodiesel Fuel and Comparison to
Petroleum-Derived Diesel Fuel:
Application of a Composition and
Enthalpy Explicit Distillation Curve
Method. Energy & Fuels, 22 (4),
2008; p 2861-2868.
http://www.ehso.com/sds.phphttp://www.ehso.com/sds.phphttp://www.ehso.com/sds.phphttp://www.ehso.com/sds.php
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
39/76
39
Nomenclature
Symbol Definition Units
a interfacial area m2
A amplitude cmf reciprocating frequency s-1
H0y height of an overall raffinate transfer unit -
HETP height equivalent to a theoretical plate cm
K y mass transfer unit -
L extract flow rate m3/s
m equilibrium factor -
N number of trays -
Uc superficial velocity of continuous phase cm/sUd superficial velocity of dispersed phase cm/s
V raffinate flow rate m3/s
xi concentration kg/m3
ya propionic acid concentration in feed -
ya* equilibrium propionic acid concentration in feed -
y b propionic acid concentration in raffinate -
y b* equilibrium propionic acid concentration in raffinate -
yi concentration kg/m3
Z height of column cm
holdup of the dispersed phase in the column
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
40/76
40
Appendix A. Experimental Data and Calculations
Table A1. Feed Properties.
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 AverageStandardDeviation
M (g) 3.975 4.0098 3.989 - -
V (mL) 5 5 5 - -
Ρ (g/mL) 0.795 0.80196 0.7978 0.79825 0.00350
Sample Calculation for mol of NaOH
of NaOH 5.5 0.02 NaOH 0.000110
1000 1000
mL NaOH mLmol
(A1)
Sample Calculation for propionic acid concentration
of acid 0.000110
0.000011mL of sample 10
mol mol mol Acid
mL (A2)
Sample Calculation for propionic acid mass flow rate
1.165 74.1
mass of acid= flow rate 0.000011 0.000949 /sec
mol mL g Acid g s
mL mol (A3)
Sample Calculation for volume of propionic acid
volume of acid = volume×molecular weight×density
74.1 990.000011 100 0.0823
Acid
mol g g mL mLmL mol mL
(A4)
Sample Calculation for volume of diesel
volume of diesel = total volume - volume of acid = 100mL - 0.0823mL = 99.9 mL (A5)
Sample Calculation for mass flow rate of diesel
volume of diesel 99.9 mL 0.798 density of feed =
time of sample 94sec mL
g (A6)
Sample Calculation for YA
mass of acid 0.000949 / = 0.00111
mass of diesel 0.849 / A
g sY
g s (A7)
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
41/76
41
Oscillation #1 – 144 oscillations/minute – 0.7cm amplitude
Table A2. Raffinate flow properties for Oscillation #1.Raffinate
Trial Volume (mL) Time (seconds) Flow rate (mL/sec)1 100 94 1.064
2 100 75 1.3333 100 91 1.099Average - - 1.165StandardDeviation
- -0.147
Table A3. Extract flow properties for Oscillation #1.Extract
Trial Volume (mL) Time (seconds) Flow rate (mL/sec)1 100 73 1.3702 100 70 1.4293 100 70 1.429
Average - - 1.409StandardDeviation
- -0.0339
Titration – Raffinate
Table A4. Titration raffinate properties for Oscillation #1.Trial Volume
Raffinate (mL)
Volume NaOH
(mL)
mol NaOH mol propionic
acid
Propionic acid
concentration
(mol/mL)1 10 5.5 0.000110 0.000110 0.0000112 10 5.2 0.000104 0.000104 0.00001043 10 5.1 0.000102 0.000102 0.0000102
Table A5. Titration raffinate properties for Oscillation #1 continued.
mass Acid (g/s) Vacid (mL) Vdiesel (mL) mass Diesel (g/s) YA ya*
0.000949 0.0823 99.9 0.849 0.00112 0
0.000898 0.0778 99.9 1.06 0.000844 0
0.000881 0.0763 99.9 0.877 0.00101 0Average
0.0546 g/min
- -Average
55.8 g/min
Average
0.000989
Average
0StandardDeviation
0.00216 g/min- -
StandardDeviation7.01 g/min
StandardDeviation0.000138
StandardDeviation
0
(More appendices followed in the original report…)
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
42/76
42
CHBE 4210 – Bioprocess Unit OperationsDr. Yonathan Thio – Ms. Jacqueline Snedeker Lab 6: Novel Transdermal Drug Delivery
(NOTE: This is not the same as the Transdermal delivery lab that we are doing in 4210!)Group 14: Larry Brown and *Moe Green
Dates Performed: July 6, 2016 – Date Submitted: July 13, 2015ABSTRACT
(See Abstract section in Style Guide for an
example. 275 word limit.)
INTRODUCTION Drug delivery has two important criteria: drug
concentration in blood plasma and effective
period. Oral medication usually fails to
achieve a steady and extended drug
concentration in the body. It requires periodic
administration ranging from several hours to a
couple of days due to rapid drug elimination in
the body. Furthermore, it experiences “first-
pass” effects in the liver, in which the drugs are
typically degraded or metabolized before
reaching the blood plasma, reducing the drug
concentration.1
To overcome such limitations, we
developed a novel transdermal drug delivery that
administers drugs across the skin. In this case
study, we designed an estradiol patch and
compared it to traditional oral medication. The
objective of the study was to determine the
effectiveness of transdermal delivery of estradiol
compared to other methods. Estradiol, a major
form of estrogen secreted by the human ovary, is
typically administered to treat menopause
symptoms. To meet our objective, we compared
the drug concentration in blood plasma between
an estradiol patch and an estradiol pill. (165
words. Limit is 170)
THEORY
(Here, you would lay out the key equations and
models used to analyze your data. 275 wordlimit. See Theory section in Style Guide for an
example.)
APPARATUS AND PROCEDURE ( Here, you would briefly describe yourapparatus and insert a diagram of theapparatus. You would also briefly describe the
procedure, noting in particular any deviations
from the lab manual.) Studies were conducted on 40
postmenopausal women. They were divided into
four groups of ten: three groups receiving
estradiol patches containing different amount of
estradiol (2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mg), and one group
receiving pills every 24 hours. We took blood
samples from the women every two hours for
three days (=72 hours), and the concentration of
serum estradiol was measured by
radioimmunoassay with respect to base-line
studies performed on the women prior to
estradiol administration.2 Key safety issues were
as follows: (list any key safety issues here, as
well as standard safety protocol.)
(Word limit is 150 words.)
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
43/76
43
RESULTS & DISCUSSION ( Note: this R&Dexample is only 350 words. Yours will be closer
to 450-550 words because in most cases youhave multiple objectives.) To determine the effectiveness of transdermal
drug delivery, the collected data were graphedwith respect to the baseline estradiol level in
blood plasma, as shown in Figure 1. (note:
Format of figure is incorrect — see Style Guide
for instructions on formatting figures/tables.)
Figure 1. Comparison of drug concentrations of 2.0,
4.0, and 8.0 mg of estradiol patch and 2.0 mg oral
medication.
The result shows that among women
receiving the estradiol patch, the concentration
of serum estradiol achieved steady state after 4
hours (as shown in Figure 1). The mean
concentrations of serum estradiol for the 2.0,
4.0, and 8.0 mg patches increased by 32, 67, and
81 pg per ml above baseline, respectively, at
steady state. By comparison, the group
receiving estradiol pill had a mean serum
concentration of estradiol 59 pg per ml above
baseline.
Transdermal drug delivery achieved a higher
concentration of estradiol in the blood plasma,
with less of the drug, than the oral medication.
When using the estradiol patch containing 4.0mg
of estradiol, the mean concentration of serum
estradiol increased by 67 pg per ml, while for
three estradiol pills each containing 2.0mg of
estradiol, concentration increased by 59 pg per
ml. Therefore, transdermal drug delivery is
more cost-effective by requiring less estradiol.
We also observed steadier estradiol
concentration from the group receiving the
estradiol patch than from the group with oral
medication. Using the estradiol patch, a steady
concentration of estradiol in blood plasma was
achieved over 62 hours. In contrast, the oralmedication yielded a sharp decline of the drug
concentration and required daily administrations
to be therapeutically effective.
The steady concentration of estradiol was due
to the constant driving force in estradiol flux
into skin. Once the stratum corneum (the
outermost skin layer) is saturated with drug, the
patch provides a steady influx of drug driven bythe concentration difference of drug between
skin and drug reservoir in the patch.
The results suggest that the estradiol patch can
be a substitute for estradiol pill, and may even
be a better method for estradiol delivery. The
estradiol patch achieved a steadier and longer
drug concentration than the estradiol pill.
Furthermore, the estradiol patch avoided highinitial spikes shown in the estradiol pills, which
possibly cause side effects.
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Our study accomplished the objectives by
illustrating the advantages that transdermal drug
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
44/76
44
delivery has over oral administration. First, it
minimized degradation or metabolization of
drug, yielding higher concentration in blood
plasma. Second, it provided sustained release of
drugs for several days to a week. Furthermore,
results showed that tight regulations on the
dosage can be accomplished due to ease of
control.
Despite these advantages, transdermal drug
delivery can be only applied to drugs that meet
certain criteria. Drugs must have low molecular
mass, less than 500 DA, high lipophilicity, and
low required dose due to the low permeability ofthe stratum corneum. Overcoming this low
permeability is a major challenge in transdermal
drug delivery.
Recommendations to improve this lab
include testing transdermal delivery of other
drugs such as caffeine and nicotine in order to
expand the application of this novel patch. We
also recommend expanding the clinical trials inorder to obtain more reliable data. (155 words)
REFERENCES 1. Shah, V. P. Topical Drug Bioavailability,
Bioequivalence, and Penetration; Springer:
Washington, DC, 1993; pp 71-88.
2. Guy, R. H.; Hadgraft, J. Transdermal Drug
Delivery, Informa Health Care: Seattle, WA,
2003; pp 1; 5; 72.
3. Prausnitz, M. R.; Mitragotri, S.; Langer, R.,
Current Status and Future Potential of
Transdermal Drug Delivery. Nature Reviews
2004, 3, 115-124.
4. Henzl, M. R.,; Loomba P. K. Transdermal
Delivery of Sex Steroids for Hormone
Replacement Therapy and Contraception: A
Review of Principles and Practice. The
Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2003, 7 ,
525-540.
5. Physician’s Desk Reference, 48th ed. Thomson
PDR: Montvale, NJ, 1994; p 822.
Note: Nomenclature and Appendices would follow on the subsequent pages. Nomenclatureand Appendices do not need to be presented in
two-column format.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
45/76
45
Nomenclature
Symbol Definition Units
A surface area m2
C pair heat capacity of air J/kg/K
C pc heat capacity of copper J/kg/K
C pw heat capacity of water J/kg/K
DAB diffusivity of an air water system m2/s
Eacc energy accumulated in a system J
Eg energy generated in a system J
Ein energy entering a system J
Eout energy leaving a system Jh convective heat transfer coefficient W/K/m2
Hfg mole heat of vaporization of water J/kg
Jix molal flux relative to molal average velocity -
K air thermal conductivity of air W/K/m2
K c thermal conductivity of copper W/K/m2
K w thermal conductivity of water W/K/m2
Lc Length of copper cylinder m
M molecular weight g/mol
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
46/76
46
Appendix A: Concentration Data
Table I A. Blah blah blah blah.
- - -
Table II A. Blah blah blah blah.
SLOPEINTERCEPT
R 2
Appendix B: ANOVA calculations
Table I B. Blah blah blah
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.000205
Within Groups 0.000155
Total 0.00036
ANOVA shows that results are significant (Fcalc>Fcrit) at a 90% confidence level.
-
8/16/2019 LabReport Style Guide
47/76
47
Appendix A: Scientif ic Wri ting & Format Specs
The “Grammar” of Scientific Writing & Format Specifics of the ChBE Lab
Report
Every field has its own “language”— that is, its own specific, standardized, conventionalways of using language and formatting text. One could call this the “grammar of a profession”
or the discourse conventions of a community. This section outlines aspects of the “grammar” ofchemical engineering that are significant to lab report writing.
1. Verb Tense: In your lab report, things that occurred in the past should be written about in the past tense.Everything in the experiment occurred in the past. There are two exceptions:
a. Use the present tense when writing about current events (industrial applications, forexample).This use of the present tense will occur mainly in the Introduction.
b. Use the present tense when writing about things that are eternally in the present, thingsthat are unaffected by time (equations, figures, tables, and theoretical ideas). Equation 9always “yields”; Figure 3 always “shows.” To clarify: if you used the past tense in thesesituations, you would be suggesting that something different holds true now: “Equation 9
yielded Equation 10 (at one time), but now Equation 9 yields something else (because ofnew research, theory, etc.).”
This “rule” applies mainly in the Theory section, but it will also come into play in the Results and Discussion section when you are explaining your graphs and tables. (e.g., “Figure 3 shows that when time increased, temperature decreased.” NOTE: the verbtied to the “thing” in the perpetual present is in the present tense (“shows”), but the verbs thatrelate to the actual experiment are in the past tense (“increased” and “decreased”)).
2. Passive vs. Active Voice:Although you should avoid passive voice as much as possible in all types of writing, thereare situations when passive constructions are appropriate in scientific writing.
NOTE: Passive voice, passive verbs, or passive constructions occur when there is no agent
in the sentence — that is, there is no one or thing doing the action (EX. “A bomb was droppedon Hiroshima.” This is passive voice because the sentence doesn’t indicate WHO or WHAT“dropped the bomb.”