Download - Maquetacion Final
-
7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final
1/4
FLOW MOVEMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
+
ECONOMIC OUTPUT PER SURFACE AREA
=
ECONOMIC SECTIONS WITH INFRASTRUCTURES DIVISIONS
The analysis deals with the following topics:Infrastructure-told within its flows.
Spot-The territory through its economicoutput. By this way we differentiate between
areas of high economic production thatdiffer with areas of low production witch we
have seen it seems the same as some envi-
ronments that have in it a radical economicchange. In most cases these infrastructures
and economic production elements verylow had ritched to be limits between the city
and the different predominating uses.
INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE
ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ
PABLO APARICIO
JAIME MONGE
JUANJO AIZCORBE
BORJA FERNANDEZ 01/04
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND USES
USES
INFRAESTRUCTURE
TRAMWAY
TRAIN
ROADS
CITY
RIVER ANDCANALS
INDUSTRY
AGRICULTURE
A
B
C
DE
FG H I
JK
A
L
M
N
OPQ
R
S
T
U
V
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
+ 10000000
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
10000000
+
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
+ 10000000
INDUSTRIA
F. VE HI CU LO F. TR EN
AGRICULTURA VIVIENDA
MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC SECTIONS
F.MARITIMO
t e r r it or ia l t igh t en up
D
B E
C F G
G7
AGRIC
ULTURE
ROTTERDA
MCITY
INDUSTR
Y
CONECTIONS DIAGRAM
-
7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final
2/4
10.000.000 /AO
1.000.000
100.000
10.0001.000100
ROADS FLOW
BOATS FLOW
TRAINS FLOW
unbalance the economy and the flows through:1-intensifing all industrial production at higthperformance / / bust the industry -> witch willincreased flows -> reactivation surrounding
areas -> green areas that are adjacent to currentindustry will become industrial landfills.2 - areas converted to intensive agricultureindustrial-> flows will decrease and the econo-my, part of the infrastructure will be unused. Toproduce an economy equal to the industryshould multiply by 6 the current surface of theAgriculture -> Agricultural production plants 6heights? Will produce new agricultural land-scape!3 - tolls on hight used infrastructure (if economicvariable introduced in the flow) -> unuse of thesepathways with the direct consequence of the useof secondary (linked to green spaces and zeroproduction) -> these pathways become obso-lete? Does it become the new economic gaps?We will produce cross relationships between thehight producing gaps and zero productionones?4 - set nodes where there is no flow -?5 - put all the intensive farming -> redirection offlows sometimes leading to overwork infrastruc-ture.6 huge economic endowents and recreationalgreen ring. -> increased flow at certain spots ofthe boundaries surrounding green cities. ->Reactivation surrounding areas.
-We have been working by giving them
a way to stich between the differentparts, whether industrial or agricultural.
- Reuse roads with low flow to generatemore tourism or agricultural activities.
-Reconnect the urban and rural areastaking advantage of Green zones witch
are around infrastructure.- Dispelling saturated industrial nodes
to win prominence in agricultural envi-
ronments that had been forgotten.
MOST IMPORTANT MEETING POINTSWITCH TOOK PLACE ON THEANALYSI
1 - Areas of economic output limits arearticulated as limits
2 - industrial areas and business parks
in lower economic output .3 - Infrastructure as separation or
boundary between strong economiccontrasts.
VARIABLES
1.economic production of surface area
2.economic production of surface area3.economic output per surface area +
movement of infrastructure
ROAD STRUCTURE NIGHT 21.00
INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE
ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ
PABLO APARICIO
JAIME MONGE
JUANJO AIZCORBE
BORJA FERNANDEZ
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
+ 10000000
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
+ 10000000
FLOW THIKNESS
TRAFFIC CONGESTIONS
ECONOMIC PRODUCTION
LINES OF ACTION
02/04 t e r r it or ia l t igh t en up
A20 A20
A12
A15
A15
A16
A4
MORNING 08.00 LUNCH TIME 13.00 AFTERNOON 18.00
DAY TRAFIC MERGE
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
+ 10000000
I
K U
VQ
S
G7
INTERSTICIAL DRAIN
-
7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final
3/4
INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE
ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ
PABLO APARICIO
JAIME MONGE
JUANJO AIZCORBE
BORJA FERNANDEZ 03/04t e r r it or ia l t igh t en upG7
1
1
AREA: 216 HA
5,4 KM POBLATION8,0 KM AGRICULTURE
AREA: 576 HA
2.8 KM POBLATION
3.4 KM INDUSTRY
22 KM AGRICULTURE
AREA: 440 HA
16 KM POBLATION
1,6 KM AGRICULTURE
AREA: 158 HA
4,9 KM POBLATION
3,15 KM AGRICULTURE
AREA: 658HA
14 KM POBLATION
8000KM AGRICULTURE
A13/E19
E25/A20
E25/A20
E25/A20
E25/A20
A4
A15
A29
A16/E19
E25/A20 A4
FUTURA A4
E25/A20
E30
A13
NORTH SEA
NORTH SEA
MONUTA TEBBENHOFF
NIEUWLANDSEPARK
HOEK VAN
HOLLAND HAVEN
MAASSLUIS
HEMPARK
VLAARDINGEN
CENTRUM
SCHIEDAM NIEUWLAND
SURFPLAS
DE LICKEBAERT
3
7 8 9
4 6
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
HOEK VAN
HOLLAND STRAND
FOPPENPLAS
INFRAESTRUCTURE
ECONOMIC
USES
SPORT
NAUTIC
GREEN AREA
WILD
BEACH
+++ POSITIVE
++ POSITIVE
+ POSITIVE
0 POSITIVE
NEGATIVE
ROADS
CANALS
RAILS
POBLATION
INDUSTRY
ROADS FLOW
AGRICULTURE
FLUVIAL FLOW
TRAINS FLOW
ROTTERDAM
NOORD
ROTTERDAM
CENTRAAL
PRINSES BEATRIXPARK
KETHEL
ORANGEPARK
VOLKSPARK
VOLKSPARK
KRIMPENHERHOUT
WETERINGBOS
ZWANENEILAND
DE VEERPLAAT
KLEIN PROFIJT
DE JOHANNAPOLDER
OEDEVLIETSEPARK
ZWANENEILAND
PARK MOLENVLIET
MIDDENWETERINGPARK
PARK
ZESTIENHOVEN
VROESENPARK
WIJKPARK
VLAARDINGENOEST
VLAARDINGEN CENTRUM
NIEUWEKERK A/D IJSSEL
ROTTERDAM ALEXANDER
A20/E25
A20/E25
N15
N57
A13/E19
A16/E19
N471
N209N209 N219
5
BERGEN
BROEKPARK
BERGEN
BROEKPARK
MELANCHTONPARK
PLASWIJCKPARK
PRINSENMOLENPARK
KRALINGSE BOS
KOOLSTEEBOS
BERNISTE
BERGSE
ACHTERPLAS
ZWANENMEER
ROTTEMEREN
ZEVENHUIZERPLAS
KRALINGSE PLAS
BERGSE
ACHTERPLAS
/VOORPLAS
ARGONAUTENPARK
ARGONAUTENPARK
SCHIIEBROEKSEPARK
SCHIIEBROEKSEPARK
ENDRAGTSPOLDER
ROTTEMEREN
WOLLEFOPPENPARK
WIJKTUIN
HET LAGE
BERGSCHE BOS
WILGENPLASPARK
PLASWIJCKPARK
CAPELLE SCHOLLEVAAR
DE MUNNIKENDEVEL
DE HOGE DEVEL
RUIGEPLAATBOS
OUDELANDSEPARK
ROTTERDAM STADION
BARENDRECHT
10
BREEDEWATER
QUACKJESWATER
OOSTVOOMSE MEER
OOSTVOOMSE MEERBRIELSE MEERSLUFTER
BRIELSE MEER
HARTE
PARK
PARK
VOGELENZANG
PUT VAN
HEENVLIET
LAKES
ROADS
TRAINS
FLUVIALS
TRAIN S TATIONS
INDUSTRY
NATURAL
POBLATION
2.5 KM INDUSTRY 2,2 KM INDUSTRY
7,3 KM INDUSTRY
AREA: 823HA
27,2 KM POBLATION
12,1 KM AGRICULTURE
AREA:871HA
21 KM POBLATION
14,5 KM AGRICULTURE
AREA: 1428 HA
15,7 KM
58,5 KM AGRICULTURE 10,8 KM INDUSTRY
AREA: 1413 HA
8,15 KM POBLATION
25,8 KM AGRICULTURE 30,6 KM INDUSTRY
AREA: 922 HA
8,6 KM POBLATION
27,5 KM AGRICULTURE
CBA D
A
B D
C
BThe B strategy, think interms of population densityhas rotterdam and, as inzero environments econo-my, housing could createelements in height, todensify it promptly, andthus, change the conceptof raised low density hous-ing, and thus in the futureleave the possibility of
releasing the current livingspaces.
NEW REARRANGEMENTOF HOUSING AREA IN
TOWER TYPOLOGY
D The strategy D, is differentfrom the rest, since in thiscase we do not tighten anyvariable, but, reaprovecha-mos an existing industrythat are all those obsolete,giving the average user, ascenario in which you cancreate from trade to parksor recreation, to free choiceof the population of rotter-dam that will transform yourtaste.
REACTIVATION OF
UNUSED INDUSTRIAL
AREAS THROUGH NATURE
AND AGRICULTURE
The A strategy is based oncreating intensive agricul-tural production in all areasof zero output chosen tovary both the direction of theflow, as the amount offinance led to that area, tosee how far he can rotter-dam even change if thesame power.
A
NEW HIGH PRODUCTION
FARMLAND
The C Strategy, has beendesigned based on pre-ex-isting industry already had,which was irregularproduction. Introducingintense production industryin those spaces with highrelation thereto, so that varyfrom the main variablessuch as flow and economyto rotterdam facade itself,creating an element in itsmost industrial.
C
NEW HIGH PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIAL SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A+B+C A+B+C+D B+D B+D A+B+C+D B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D B
STRATEGY SCHEMES
-
7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final
4/4
PROPOSAL SCHEME:
This infrastructure is a limit and we want tobreak it, but above all, we want to weave withadjacent.
Our proposal aims to create a series of
actions, a number of provisions, a numberof spaces, and join them by railway and a
highway underground, to hide the traffic carsand motorcycles, in turn also attach a set of
rails bike.
DISTANCE SCHEME:
This green line is physically contained in
1,600 m, and in this corridor, in the middlethere is a green band, which is going to act
in large part, to the sides of this line are twosmall channels, which are to generate a
series of allocations for the generation of
different water sports activities such ascanoeing and kayaking.
They also say that the width of this corridor isbetween 144 m wide.
CONCEPT SCHEME:What we propose in this proposal is to link twocities, the city of Rotterdam, city to study, and
the town of Delft, we seem to have generateda great opportunity with this green line, and so
we act on this site, would generate one greenenvelopes in this corridor.
Importantly, these two locations fail to touchand this is due to agriculture, so we aim to
unite these two locations with a green corridor,and unite the towns to agriculture.
ROAD SCHEME:
Studying the economic composition ofRotterdam we have realized that there is aneconomic vacuum long wingspan, is the A4,a planned road, now is a green corridor is aroad that is cut and leave this space.
It's really an infrastructure, but unoccupied.And linking the cities of Rotterdam andDelft.
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE
ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ
PABLO APARICIO
JAIME MONGE
JUANJO AIZCORBE
BORJA FERNANDEZ 04/04t e r r it or ia l t igh t en upG7