Download - Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew
![Page 1: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TOPIC
EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION ON SOIL PROPERTIES,
PHYSIOLOGY AND NUTRIENT ASSIMLATION OF SWEET
PEPPER (Capsicum annuum)
BY
TABITHA MENSAH
![Page 2: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Water supplies are limited worldwide (Postel, 1998) and there is an
urgent need to identify and adopt better irrigation management
strategies.
Low moisture in the soil may however lead to problems of reduced
growth rate, metabolic activities, development and yield of crops.
Low soil moisture could also result in total loss of a farmer’s whole
crop or make his crops vulnerable to both biotic and abiotic
complications (Ware and McCollum, 1975).
![Page 3: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTION CONT’D
Deficit irrigation, is a practice of reducing the amount of water
supplied to a crop or reducing the frequency of water application.
It ensures optimum yield in times of drought or make proper use of
irrigation water.
The application of less water reduces the leaching effects of
nutrients from the root-zone and agrochemicals and the groundwater
quality is preserved (Pandey et al., 2000)..
![Page 4: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
BENEFITS OF SWEET PEPPER
SWEET PEPPER
Beautification, taste, flavour
Vitamins(thiamine, carotene, B12)
Spices, sauce, pickles
Phytochemical properties
![Page 5: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Relative abundance or scarcity of water as well as the lack of
irrigation knowledge leads to over irrigation or under irrigation.
This results in leaching of plant nutrients, saturation of soil to create
anaerobic conditions which can result in root damage, reduced root
respiration, and lime hydrolysis as well as denitrification of nitrate
fertilizers.
Therefore, there is the need to consider measuring the amount of
water applied to crop like sweet pepper which has an extensive
shallow root system, and is susceptible to water logging.
![Page 6: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
OBJECTIVE
General objective
To examine the effect of deficit irrigation on soil properties,
physiology and nutrient uptake of sweet pepper.
Specific objective
To assess the effect of deficit irrigation on the harvest index and dry
matter accumulation.
To assess the effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium uptake by
sweet pepper.
To assess the effect of deficit irrigation on soil physical properties.
![Page 7: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
JUSTIFICATION
Several researches have been carried out on deficit irrigation with
resulting indicating 10-15% reduction of crop water requirement had
no significant effect on the yield.
The interest of the research was to investigate the effect of deficit
irrigation on soil physical & chemical properties and physiology of
sweet pepper which have a direct effect of the yield.
![Page 8: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
STUDY AREA
The study was conducted at the engineering field of the School of
Agriculture Teaching and Research Farm at University of Cape Coast.
AREA FEATURES
Annual temperature of 23.2-33.2 ºC with an annual mean of 27.6 ºc
Relative humidity is 81.3-84.4% (Owusu-Sekyere et al 2011).
The annual rainfall is between 650 and 1100 mm (Alhassan, 2009).
![Page 9: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Design
Completely Randomized Block Design (CRBD) with three (3)
treatments (T1-T3) and three (3) replications (R1- R3). Each
replication had 4 (four) plants.
Treatment
T1, 100% of CWR; T2, 90% of CWR; T3, and 80% of CWR.
Planting
Sweet pepper seeds were nursed, and the healthy seedlings were
transplanted into the plastic pots under a rain shed on.
![Page 10: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DATA PARAMETERS
Data was collected on the following parameters Soil physical properties ; bulk density, particle density and
porosity
Soil chemical properties ; Nitrogen %, potassium and
phosphorus content
Vegetative parameters ; dry matter accumulation and harvest
index
![Page 11: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION
Fresh leaves from the top, middle and down part of data plants
randomly selected and weighed.
Samples were oven-dried at 105 ºC to constant weight to determine
their total dry weight.
Dm= Total dry weight of sample ×100
Total fresh weight of sample
(Patel & Rajput, 2013)
![Page 12: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
HARVEST INDEX
Harvest index was calculated by dividing total dry weight of fruit by
total dry weight of plant.
![Page 13: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
BULK DENSITY
Bulk density of soil was determined using the method as described by
(McKenzie et al., 2004).
Bulk density (g/cm3) = ( ( ))/( 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑔 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒( 3)) 𝑐𝑚
Dry soil weight (g) = W2 – W1
Soil volume (cm3) = 3.14 x r2 x ring height.
![Page 14: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PARTICLE DENSITY
Particle density was calculated as follows;
Volume of soil solids = final volume of soil – initial water volume
(50ml)
Particle density = oven-dry soil weight / volume of soil solids
![Page 15: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
POROSITY
Porosity of each sample was calculated by finding the ratio of bulk
density to particle density and multiplying by 100 to give the %
solid space. 100 were then subtracted from the % solid space to
obtain the porosity for each sample.
% solid space = (bulk density / particle density) x 100
% porosity = 100 - (% solid space)
![Page 16: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PERCENTAGE NITROGEN
Micro-Kjedahl method was used for nitrogen determination.
Steps involved in nitrogen determination are;
Digestion, Distillation and Titration
𝑁 (%) = ( − ) )𝑆 𝐵 𝑋 𝑆𝑂𝐿𝑈𝑇𝐼𝑂𝑁 𝑉𝑂𝐿𝑈𝑀𝐸
(100 )𝑋 𝐴𝐿𝐼𝐺𝑈𝑂𝑇 𝑋 𝑆𝐴𝑀𝑃𝐿𝐸𝑊𝐸𝐼𝐺𝐻𝑇
Where
S - sample titre value
B – Blank titre value
![Page 17: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PHOSPHORUS DETERMINATION
Bray No 1 method (with Ascorbic Acid) was used.
![Page 18: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
POTASSIUM CONT’D
Flame photometry was used to determine potassium.
![Page 19: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The various results obtained were subjected to the analysis of
variance (ANOVA) using Genstat statistical software.
Mean comparisons were done using least significance difference
test at a probability level of 5%.
![Page 20: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
RESULTS
Treatment Bulk density (g/cm3) Particle density (g/cm3) Porosity %
T1 1.333 a 2.530 a 45.53 a
T2 1.357 b 2.610 b 47.83 b
T3 1.387 c 2.630 b 49.30 b
Lsd0.05
![Page 21: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Treatment Harvest index Dry matter accumulated
T1 1.333 a 733.7 a
T2 1.357 b 786.8 ab
T3 1.387 c 811.3 c
Lsd0.05
![Page 22: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION ON NITROGEN UPTAKE
NB NA NB NA NB NAT1 T2 T3
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
(Nitr
ogen
leve
l %)
Source; field data 2015
![Page 23: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION ON POTASSIUM UPTAKE
KB KA KB KA KB KAT1 T2 T3
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Pota
ssiu
m le
vels
(K C
mol
/kg
Source; field data 2015
![Page 24: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
EFFECT OF DEFICIT IRRIGATION ON PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE
PB PA PB PA PB PAT1 T2 T3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Phos
phor
us le
vels
(P g
p/g
)
Source; field data 2015
![Page 25: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CONCLUSION
From the results on the study it could be concluded that
Although deficit irrigation affects soil physical properties but its
effect is not significant. However increasing water deficit has
increasing effect on soil physical properties.
Also the higher available moisture content the higher the rate of
nutrient uptake. However excessive application of water could lead to
leaching effect on certain soil nutrients.
![Page 26: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
RECOMMENDATION
From the study it could be recommended that;
A comprehensive study should be carried out on the effect of deficit
irrigation on other micro nutrients uptake in the soil (Ca, Mg)
Also a study on the salinity rate of soil under deficit irrigation must be
carried.
Also other varying levels of water deficit on soil physiochemical
properties can be researched.
![Page 27: Tabitha Mensah presentation pp tnew](https://reader035.vdocuments.pub/reader035/viewer/2022062822/587f5c6c1a28ab0d378b7769/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
END OF PRESENTATION
THANK YOU