Transcript
Page 1: The measurement of the average shower development profile

The measurement of the average shower development profile

高能所:张丙开

导师:曹臻、王焕玉

南京 Apr. 28, 2008

Page 2: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Contents

Introduction Measurement method Data sample Average development profile Uncertainty analysis Discussion and Conclusion

Page 3: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Introduction : EAS

Anatomy of an air shower initiated by a high energy proton

Nmax

Xmax

A simulated shower longitudinal development profile

To measure shower longitudinal development profile with HiRes stereo data

Page 4: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Introduction: Motivation• The shower shape of development profile is very important

for energy reconstruction

• Empirical shower development function are based on data at lower energy or based on theoretical electromagnetic cascade calculation

• None of them has been experimentally tested at these energies in the atmosphere (above 1018eV)

• The profile with energy between 1017-1018eV has been tested by HiRes/MIA experiment

• It is necessary to measure the profile at higher energy with HiRes stereo data

Page 5: The measurement of the average shower development profile

The HiRes experiment

HiRes1 & HiRes: 22 (42) Mirrors azimuth angle: 0-3600, elevation angle: 3-17 (3-3

1) electronics: H&S (FADC) began operation in June, 1

997 (Dec 1999). End : Apr. 2006

HiRes experiment:

– located at the U.S. Army Dugway proving grounds in Utah

– A fluorescence detector

– Two sites: HiRes1 & HiRe2

– Data analysis mode: • Monocular and stereo

Page 6: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Method• So, Cerenkov light is not proportional

to the number of charge particles in each step

• Subtract the Cerenkov light, convert the signals into shower sizes (correction).

• Measured signals: – Fluorescence light

• proportional to the number of charge particles & isotropy

– Direct Cerenkov light• Mainly along with shower direction• Accumulated

– Scattered Cerenkov light (Cerenkov beam)• Rayleigh scatter• Mie scatter

Page 7: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Measurement method

• Determine Xmax and Nmax by a local fit

• Normalize showers & align them together according to shower ages

• Average shower sizes in age bins

Size(X) = size(X) / Nmax

s = 3X/(X+2Xmax)

Page 8: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Data sample

HiRes stereo data:– 1999.12-2005.11

• Cuts are used as following: – ψ angle: ψ> 135o – Zenith angle: θ > 60o – Shower slant depth span: Δdepth < 250g/cm2

– Shower Xmax is not seen by the detector

• 2095 events are survived with clear profiles & minimum Cherenkov light contaminations

Page 9: The measurement of the average shower development profile

The average profile

The average shower longitudinal development profile (the dots) and fitting functions.

Page 10: The measurement of the average shower development profile

X0 is the initial point, Nm is the shower maximum,Xm is shower maximum location,λ is the shower decay length

Tm = Xm/ λ, T0 = X0/ λ

Where y = Xm/L0, T = X/L0, L0 is the radiation length, about 36.66g/cm2

2 3(1 ln )

3 20.31( )

sy s

sn s k ey

2

2

( 1)

2( )s

n s k e

Gaisser-Hillas function

Greisen function

Gaussian-in-Age function

where σ is the width of shower

X sN/Nm n

Page 11: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Uncertainty analysis

• Cherenkov light subtraction: – assuming a Cherenkov light

contamination of 4.0% and 8.0% in the first bin

• Atmospheric condition: – average atmospheric condition

– Daily atmospheric parameters

The shape of profile has no noticeable change

Page 12: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Discussion: shower width vs. Xmax

Shower widths dependence on shower Xmax

DATAMC

Sigma=-0.021*xmax/100+0.356Sigma=-0.018*xmax/100+0.339

Sigma=-0.015*xmax/100+0.312

Correlation coefficient: 88%

Correlation coefficient: 27% Correlation coefficient: 50%

Page 13: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Discussion: energy resolution

Energy resolution has improvement, especially the big tail vanished

Page 14: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Discussion: shower width vs. Energy

Page 15: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Conclusion Conclusion

• Gaisser-Hillas, Greisen and Gaussian-in-Age functions describe the average profile equally well.

• The integrals of three functions are all lower than that of data by about 1.5%.

• The widths of showers have dependence on their Xmax

Page 16: The measurement of the average shower development profile
Page 17: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Gaisser-Hillas function

Where X0 is the initial point, Nm is the shower maximumXm is shower maximum locationλ is the shower decay length

X sN/Nm n

Tm = Xm/ λ, T0 = X0/ λ

Page 18: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Greisen function

Greisen function describes the development of a pure electromagnetic air shower

Where y = Xm/L0, T = X/L0, L0 is the radiation length, about 36.66g/cm2

2 3(1 ln )

3 20.31( )

sy s

sn s k ey

Page 19: The measurement of the average shower development profile

Gaussian-in-Age function

2

2

( 1)

2( )s

n s k e

where σ is the width of shower


Top Related