ASEE 2009: DyKnow 1
Learning Style, Student Motivation and Active Learning
William BirminghamVincent F. DiStasiand Gary Welton
ASEE ConferenceJune, 2009Austin, TX
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 2
Grove City College
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 3
Studied Active Learning Software/Tablet PCs for several years Faculty highly satisfied with software/Tablet PCs Students are neutral about satisfaction compared with other
computer-based technologies Student who like DyKnow are:◦ Motivated to learn◦ Like receiving faculty notes◦ Are active learners
Key points
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 4
1:1 Tablet PC program now in sixth year◦ 16th year for 1:1 laptop/TabletPC program
Ubiquitous computing ◦ Networking (wired & wireless) in all classrooms, most places on
campus Reduced technology costs◦ Retire almost all general computer labs◦ Retain specialized labs
Tablet PC Computing Program
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 5
Study long-term use and satisfaction◦ Dyknow and Classroom Presenter◦ Tablet PCs◦ Impact on learning:
Note taking Active learning
Population: faculty and students across the college◦ Science and Engineering◦ Humanities
Study is in its 3rd year
Research Project: Technology in Classroom
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 6
Active learning: student-faculty engagement in the class◦ Socratic style in a modern setting
Research points to the benefits of active learning◦ Students retain more of the lecture material◦ Students immediately exercise concepts
It can be painful◦ Lecture is no longer a place to surf the web or to sleep◦ Falling can lead to painful experiences in classroom◦ Responsibility more clearly lies with student in learning◦ Some ingrained habits (notetaking) don’t work
Active learning
Software supporting active learning Classroom Presenter, DyKnow Instantly transmit prepared or extemporaneous content
to student screens◦ Progressive disclosure of content.◦ Content can be freehand, PowerPoint, web, etc.
Collaborative note taking Student response tools Content replay Collect, grade and return student work
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 8
Note: DyKnow is a proxy for active learning General evaluation plan◦ Survey students and faculty in “DyKnow classes” in initial
years◦ Survey general population on
Learning style Note taking style Attitudinal: active learning, technology in the classroom,
motivation for learning
Evaluation Plan
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 9
Fall 2006: DyKnow without interactive features. Spring 2007: DyKnow using interactive features.◦ Faculty and students participate in the Index of Learning
Styles© (ILS), created by Felder and Soloman. Spring 2008: General use of DyKnow◦ General population ILS survey
Fall, 2008: General use of DyKnow◦ General population ILS survey◦ General population “personal factors”
Surveys
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 10
Assess preferred learning styles on four dimensions.
◦ Visual: prefer visual representation of material◦ Verbal: prefer written and spoken explanations
◦ Sequential: linear thinking process, learn in incremental steps◦ Global: holistic thinking process, learn in large leaps
◦ Sensing: concrete, practical, oriented toward facts and procedures◦ Intuitive: conceptual, innovative, oriented toward theories and underlying
meanings
◦ Active: learn by trying things out, enjoy working in groups◦ Reflective: learn by thinking things through, prefer working alone or with one or
two familiar partners
Description of ILS
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 11
Student evaluation marginally below midpoint ◦M = 2.63/5; SD= 0.98
Satisfaction rating varied from course to course◦ 2.25 to 3.75◦Most favorable rating where DyKnow use was voluntary
Students rated themselves as proficient with DyKnow (M = 4.61/7) and faculty as proficient (M=4.62/7)
Baseline: Fall 2006 Results
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 12
*To what extent do you think DyKnow enhances your understanding of material and concepts as they are presented in class in comparison to a class that uses …
2007/08 Results
QuestionSpring 2007Mean and sd (N = 154)
Spring 2008Mean and sd (N = 294)
*lecture and chalkboard? M = 4.18, sd = 1.82 M = 4.04, sd = 1.68
*overhead transparencies? M = 4.50, sd = 1.63 M = 4.45, sd = 1.64
*PowerPoint or OneNote? M = 3.71, sd = 1.63 M = 3.66, sd = 1.53
Global Satisfaction M = 4.12, sd = 1.52 M = 4.06, sd = 1.44
1 = DyKnow provides a very significant disadvantage.4 = DyKnow provides neither and advantage nor a disadvantage.7 = DyKnow provides a very significant advantage.
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 13
Question All Students
Using DyKnow enhances my understanding of course material. M = 3.18
Using DyKnow provides me with a better set of notes. M = 3.61
I am more attentive during class because DyKnow is used. M = 2.77
I am more confident during exams when I have studied material from my DyKnow notes as compared to when I have studied from traditional paper notes.
M = 2.97
2007/2008 Student Results
1 = Strongly Disagree4 = Neither Disagree or Agree7 = Strongly Agree
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 14
Data and written comments show large disparity in student satisfaction
Satisfaction of DyKnow versus other technologies How do we explain these things?◦ Technology bias (for or against)◦ Technology learning curve
Student motivation seemed important …
Why the disparity
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 15
Students who completed all three surveys: DyKnow, ILS, personal factors◦ N=166 (students completing all three surveys in Fall, 2009)
Fall 2009 Survey
Mean Stan Dev ScaleTECHBIAS 3.79 1.15 1 to 6Active vs reflective 0.44 4.63 -11 to 11MOTIV8 5.06 0.80 1 to 7NOTETAKING 3.75 1.21 1 to 5GLOBALSAT 4.22 1.24 1 to 7
16
TECHBIAS has little effect◦ Reflected in different bias where CS students are less likely to
be satisfied with DyKnow than general population Students with intrinsic motivation to learn the material
tend to be satisfied with DyKnow Active Learners tend to be more satisfied
ASEE 2009: DyKnow
Discussion
Variable β-weight tobs pTECHBIAS .295 3.89 < .001Active v Reflective -.168 2.25 .03MOTIV8 .178 2.36 .02NOTETAKING -.203 2.74 .01
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 17
The paradox:◦ Too many notes: students loose attention◦ Too few notes: reflective students can’t reflect◦ Students who like lots of notes like DyKnow
Discussion: The notetaking paradox
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 18
The following dimensions showed statistically significant correlations◦ Visual learners more positive reaction toward DyKnow.◦ Sequential learners more positive reaction toward DyKnow.
ILS Correlations
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 19
On average, students are neutral about Dyknow◦ About half of the students are relatively neutral◦ About one quarter like it, and one quarter don’t
Of the students who like Dyknow:◦ Intrinsically motivated to learn◦ Like “delivered” notes◦ Like active learning◦ Tend to like technology in the classroom
On average, faculty are strongly positive about Dyknow
Summary and Conclusions
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 20
Microsoft Corporation for funding through the University Relations Tablet PC and Higher Education.
DyKnow for continued support of this research.
Acknowledgements
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 21
*To what extent do you think DyKnow enhances your teaching of material and concepts as they are presented in class in comparison to a class that uses …
Faculty Results, Spring 2007
QuestionFaculty, (N = 21)Mean and sd
*lecture and chalkboard? M = 6.14, sd = 0.91
*overhead transparencies? M = 6.29, sd = 0.72
*PowerPoint or OneNote? M = 5.57, sd = 0.98
Global Satisfaction M = 6.00, sd = 0.70
1 = DyKnow provides a very significant disadvantage.4 = DyKnow provides neither and advantage nor a disadvantage.7 = DyKnow provides a very significant advantage.
Students, (N = 154)Mean and sd
M = 4.18, sd = 1.82
M = 4.50, sd = 1.63
M = 3.71, sd = 1.63
M = 4.12, sd = 1.52
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 22
Faculty using DyKnowDepartment Fall 06 Spring 07 Spring 08
Biology 1 1 1Business 0 0 2Chemistry 1 2 1Computer Science 2 5 6Economics 1 1 0Electrical Engineering 0 0 1Mechanical Engineering 3 3 4Music 1 0 0Physics 1 1 0Political Science 1 1 1Psychology 1 1 0Religion 0 1 1Sociology 1 0 0Totals 13 16 17
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 23
Courses using DyKnowDepartment Fall 06 Spring 07 Spring 08
Business 1 1 5Chemistry 0 1 1Computer Science 5 8 15Electrical Engineering 0 0 2General Science 3 3 5General Engineering 1 1 1Humanities 0 1 2Mathematics 0 1 2Mechanical Engineering 2 4 6Music 1 0 0Physics 1 1 0Political Science 1 1 1Psychology 2 1 0Religion 0 1 0Sociology 1 0 0Totals 18 24 40
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 24
It gives a false sense of security, you don't have to pay attention because you get the notes straight from DyKnow. This becomes a problem when studying the notes and they are unclear and difficult to understand.
It's the actual TAKING of the notes that helps me the most. When
they are given to me, I am simply an observer, and learn not nearly as much.
I like to take notes actively. I think that the actual act of writing
something down for yourself helps people learn. If anything, I paid attention less because the slides and notes were
given to me. I pay more attention in a class with chalkboard notes.
Student Comments on Notetaking
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 25
It was really nice not having to worry about writing down everything the professor was writing down, and I now have a very detailed set of notes that are fairly easy to study.
I like DyKnow because I can get the outline of a professor's notes and I can add my own notes on top of that. Also, in this class, I didn't need to copy very difficult diagrams and drawings.
DyKnow took notes for me so I could focus on the concepts; not frantically taking notes.
Student Comments on Notetaking
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 26
DyKnow is a very effective tool for teaching Mathematics because it combines the spontaneity of a blackboard lecture with the structure and reproducibility of a PowerPoint lecture. Also, the time-consuming, embarrassing, and inefficient practice of having students work at the blackboard in front of their peers is replaced by an (optionally anonymous) efficient process in which students work individually and the instructor can choose which solution to critique.
DyKnow allows the ability to teach using a multitude of techniques all in one product. The main idea is not to do everything for the students but help them grasp the information.
Faculty Comments
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 27
Polling and panel management are GREAT! I miss animations that PowerPoint support.
DyKnow was great for marking up code segments and explaining what the code accomplished, in some cases line-by-line.
I did not require the students to use DyKnow. About 1/4 to 1/3 of the students chose to use the program.
Faculty Comments
ASEE 2009: DyKnow 28
Test hypothesis that students who are intrinsically motivated to learn the material would respond more favorably to this form of active learning◦ Campus-wide survey of student motivation toward learning.◦ Analyze relationships among this survey data, learning styles and
DyKnow satisfaction measures. Education: the major factor◦ Faculty:
Help students understand the value and process of taking better notes.◦ Students:
Improve proficiency Improve note taking methods
Future Work