drharshpurohi mansi mathur

8/13/2019 Drharshpurohi Mansi Mathur

1/7

1

3

RatDr. Harsh PAssociate prBanasthali

ABSTRThere are

bank busin

where the

HDFC Ba

Quantitati

Qualitativ

collected f

the model

criteria de

By applyicapital Ad

achieved t

Keywords

INTROThe Anal

making m

results of

has been a

The specif

) To identif) To present

criterias.

) To analyzState of AT

T

u

u

t

st

c

q

J

b

a

T

r

d

a

h

ing of Prohitfessor,niversity, Rajast

CTmany bank st

ess segment a

most suitable

nk & Axis B

e factors like

factor like

or the period

The rating of

ision-making.

g the AHPequacy criteri

e highest rati

: Analytic Hie

UCTIONtic Hierarchy

thods in case

he study will

pplied in this s

ic objectives o

the objective

a developed

the results.rt

he application

ihomir Hunj

ing develope

ing Microsoft

ol for decidi

hwanruthai

eps to be fol

nsistency & i

unjak, Dragodel is based

antitative and

valgi, Arma

anagement an

nk selection

major metrop

he AHP is a

lated to the

velopment, p

ea of selectio

s been used i

ivate Secan

keholders, fro

nd each of the

bank has to b

nk have bee

Profit , Capita

orporate Gov

(2000-10) but

banks is done

AHP Model h

odel methoda over other

g, followed b

rarchy Proces

Process that

when the dec

be useful for

tudy using Mi

f this paper ar

s (criteria and

ierarchy struc

of the AHP

k, Nina Begi

AHP model.

Office Excel.

ng which ba

unruamkae

owed. It was

the consisten

Jakovevi

on the AHP

qualitative da

cost and Ho

d analysis of

y consumers f

litan area. Va

ultiple criteri

decision-maki

riority and ran

and evaluati

engineering,

tor Ban

m the govern

m requires sp

chosen. Thr

undertaken

Adequacy ,

rnance. The

an average fig

using Analyti

as been applie

logy, It hasriterias. Aft

Axis Bank

, Banks, Bank

ill be used f

ision is based

ank's clients,

rosoft Excel.

:

sub criteria) re

ure of the AH

as received

evi present

The applicat

It was observ

nk is better

describes h

analyzed by

y ratio is mor

presents a

ethod (Anal

ta.

sseini descri

onsumer ban

or managerial

idya and Ku

a decision-ma

ng: selection,

king. It is obs

n. As far as t

personal and s

s using

ent to ordina

cific informa

e Leading pri

or the study

iquidity & M

ata for Quan

ure of each f

c Hierarchy P

in the study

een found thr compiling

then HDFC

s rating, Quali

r Banks rati

on Qualitativ

partners, and

levant for the

P model for th

onsiderable a

s comparison

ion for comp

ed that AHP

in respect to

ow AHP anal

the authors t

e than 0.10 th

ulticriteria m

tical Hierarch

ed how to

selection de

decision maki

arpresent a

king method t

evaluation,

erved that the

e area of app

ocial categorie

nalytic

ry people. Ea

ion on bank b

vate sector ba

,to rate which

nagement ,w

titative as wel

actor have bee

rocess. It is a

sing Microso

t Researchersll the criteria

ank.

tative & Quan

g is one of t

& Quantitati

investors or ot

ratingof bank

e rating of ba

tention in the

of financial r

ring bank's fi

odel for prio

the criteria/s

ysis can be d

at With AH

n we can revi

del for the

y Process), an

se the Anal

isions. The su

ng is demonst

literature revi

hat has been

enefitcost a

AHP is bein

ication is con

s.

ierarchAnand Co

h of them is i

usiness. There

nks of India n

is the best b

ich are based

l as qualitativ

n considered f

mathematical

t Excel.

have given hs it is obser

titative factors

e most widel

e criterias an

her interested

.

ks using quali

recent literat

atios of 15 lar

nancial ratios

itizing banks t

ub criteria g

ne in Excel

, we can me

se pair wise co

ank performa

d it enables t

tic Hierarch

itability of th

ated using an

w of the appl

sed in almos

alysis, alloca

predominantl

erned, most o

y ProcesMrs. MansiL

lege of Educatio

nterested in s

are many situ

amely ICICI

ank on the b

n financial ra

e factors hav

or the applica

technique for

ighest prefereed that ICICI

.

exploited d

d sub-criteria

parties. AHP

tative & quant

re. Dejan

ge banks of

has been dev

hat can be us

iven in the

explained v

asure the deg

mparisons.Ti

nce evaluatio

e integration

Process for

AHP in exa

mpirical anal

ications of the

all the appli

tions, plannin

y used in the

f the times th

sathur,ecturer,, Agra.

ecific

ations

ank ,

sis of

tios &

been

ion of

multi-

nce tobank

cision

s. The

odel

itative

huli,

roatia

loped

d as a

odel.

arious

ree of

omir

. The

of the

bank

ining

sis in

AHP.

ations

g and

theme

AHP


2/7

Research

There is apeople. Ea

on bank b

source of

synthesize

exploitabl

data prese

report con

Within thi

applicatio

qualitative

priorities

The Anal

The Analsetting pri

be conside

(the select

decision p

which con

The metho

1)The hier

criteria an

2) On eac

the elemen

3) On the

calculated.

are allowe

4) The res

ResearchThe study

purpose of

factors ha

the applica

The goal

quantitativ

Liquidity

quantitativ

Profitabilit

Ratios).M

(Financial

(Financialcriterias fo

On the bot

Bank.

Problem

huge interestch of them is i

siness. There

information is

picture of all

through finan

ted in Annual

ains the corpo

study, the A

through the

and quantita

f the alternati

tic Hierarch

tic Hierarchyrities and ma

red. The AH

ion of given

oblem solvin

sists of the go

d application

archy model o

sub criteria o

h hierarchy st

ts of this level

basis of the p

Numbers of n

to change pr

lts are prioriti

Methodologyhas undertak

rating . Five

e been collect

tion of the mo

f the study is

e criterias.

one qualitat

e criteria are

y Criteria is

anagement C

ratios) & Li

ratios) . Rr Corporate G

tom level of t

in bank businnterested in s

are many sit

annual report

business proc

cial ratios. Fin

reports. Finan

rate governan

P is used to

proposed AH

ive criteria a

es) can greatl

Process

Process (AHing the best

is one of the

alternatives a

, which this

l, the criteria,

an be explain

f the decision

n lower levels

ucture level, t

, starting with

air-wise comp

umerical calc

ferences and

es of the alter

n three major

criterias have

ed for the per

del. AHP Mo

to rate the ba

our quantitati

ive criteria na

ased on sub-

based on t

iteria depend

quidity is ba

searchers havvernance.

e hierarchy a

ss and thereecific bank b

ations where

s of the bank

esses of a ban

ancial ratios a

cial ratios are

e report, whic

evelop and v

model is d

d the results

contribute to

) is a powerf ecision when

most widely

nd their prio

ethod uses, is

the sub criteri

d in four step

problem is de

and finally alt

he pair-wise c

the top of the

arisons, weig

lations are ma

o test the resu

atives in the f

private secto

been underta

iod (2000-10)

el is applied f

ks & on the

ve criterias

ely Corporat

riterias whic

o sub-criteri

on two sub-

sed on two s

e based Capi

e the alternati

are many bansiness segme

the most suit

s. Annual rep

k during the p

re the product

widely used t

h has been use

lidate a mode

veloped. Res

of these com

the higher qu

ul and flexiblboth qualitati

xploited deci

itizing) is ba

based on the

and the alter

:

eloped in suc

ernatives at th

omparisons s

ierarchy and

ts (Priority v

de to get weig

ts if the Incon

rm of a priori

banks of Ind

en for rating

but an averag

r rating the b

asis of results

namely Pr

e Governance

are Financial

as i.e. Retu

criterias i.e.

ub- criterias

al Adequacy

es i.e. three b

! "#

stakeholderst and each of

ble bank has

rts are gener

riod of one y

of Annual rep

analyses a ba

d in the study

for rating of

archers expre

parisons (calc

lity of stakeh

e decision mae and quantit

ion making

ed on severa

roblem deco

atives.

a way that th

bottom of th

ould be done

working this

ctor) of elem

ht for each de

sistency level

ty list of alter

ia namely ICI

. The data fo

figure of ea

nks.

find the best

fitability, Ca

have been ha

Ratios.

rn on Assets

Profit per em

i.e. Cash dep

on Capital A

anks namely I

!!

, from the govthem requires

to be chosen.

ted yearly by

ar. Informati

orts and can b

nk's performa

for banks ratin

banks. Further

ss their prefe

lated weight

lders decision

king processtive aspects

ethods in cas

l criteria (Su

position into

goal is positi

model.

by comparing

ay to the lowe

ents of the hi

ision making

is high.

atives .

CI , HDFC &

quantitative

h factor have

bank on the b

ital Adequac

ve taken for h

& Return

ployee & Bu

osit ratio &

dequacy ratio.

CICI Bank ,

#

ernment to orspecific infor

The most im

bank and pre

n can be eve

calculated fr

ce. Also the

gs.

more, a Excel

ences based

of the criter

s.

which is helf a decision n

s when the d

-criteria). Co

a hierarchy str

oned at the to

all Possible p

st level.

rarchy structu

element.Resea

AXIS Bank

s well as qual

been conside

asis of qualita

, Managem

ierarchy mode

n Equity(Fin

iness per em

redit deposit

There are n

DFC Bank &

dinaryation

ortant

sent a

more

m the

nnual

-based

n the

ia and

ful ineed to

cision

mplex

ucture

, with

airs of

re are

rchers

or the

itative

ed for

ive &

ent &

l. The

ancial

loyee

Ratio

sub-

AXIS


3/7

eturn on

quity

Profita

Step :1 Th

Step: 2 P

consistency

A pair wi

elements

that ranges

After dev

respect to

matrix is c

later used

criteria sh

make sure

CR = CI/

& RI stan

value n. I

comparisoPair wise cGoal

CG

CA

L

P

M

Total

Return

Assets

ility

decision hiera

air wise comp

ratio.

se compariso

ith respect to

from equally

loping a pair

criteria & for

arried out & b

o get the corr

uld be equal t

that the origin

I, where CI st

s for Random

CR> 0.10),

ns.mparison of c

CG

1

3

3

3

3

12

on

Capital

Capital

Adequacy

rchy is formul

arison of each

is the proce

another eleme

preferred to ex

wise compari

each alternati

y averaging th

sponding rati

o 1. Consisten

al preference r

ands for consi

Index. To kn

then we are n

riterias (TablCA

0.33

1

0.67

0.67

0.67

3.34

Rat

$%&

$*+,

dequacy

ratio

ted with goals,

element with

ss of compar

nt (the goal) i

tremely prefe

sons matrix f

ves with resp

values in ea

g of each alte

cy ratio (CR)

atings were co

stency Index,

ow the value

ot consistent

1)L

0.33

1.5

1

3

2

7.5

ing & Choo

C

'(),%+*

Liqui

Alt

criteria, sub c

each at each

ing the relati

n the level ab

red.

r each criteri

ct to sub- crit

h row the rese

rnative. The su

is calculated.

nsistent.

I is calculate

f RI, we look

enough then

P

0.3

1.5

0.3

1

2

4.8

sing the bes

riterias 5

-('+*

'(),%+* -$*+

dity

rnatives

! "#

iteria & altern

level, Normal

e importance

ve. The Pair-

a with respec

erias , the p

archers get P

m of priority

he purpose o

d by using Ex

up at the Ran

he researcher

t bank

Corporate

!!

atives.

ization Proced

, preference o

ise Comparis

t to goal, eac

rocedure of n

iority Vector

ector value o

calculating c

cel Matrix Mu

dom indices t

s need to go

M

0.33

1.5

0.5

0.5

1

3.83

Governance

#

ure & calcula

r likelihood

ons uses Saat

sub-criteria

rmalization o

r weights whi

each criteria

nsistency rati

ltiplication Fu

ble & it depe

back and revi

Priority Ve

0.0783

0.2969

0.1609

0.2420

0.2828

1

C.R = 0.

-,.+*

)(-

(/)0,1(

Ma

ion of

f two

scale

s with

f each

ch are

sub

o is to

nction

ds on

se the

ctor

1

5

2%+3(%

)(-

(/)0,1

nagement

%

(


4/7

Note: - C

ManagemThe resea

researcher

have been

most over

preferencePair wise c

Pr

Note:- RO

The resear

Profitabilit

researcher

original prPair wise

Ca

Cre

The resea

Liquidity

by researc

that originPair wise c

M

Note:- BThe resea

respect to

employee

and since iPair wise c

Table 5Corporate

Governance

ICICI

HDFC

AXIS

Total

All three

no sub

decided th

HDFC ban

The consis

Table 6

for Corpor

ntchers have c

have mode

assigned. Pri

other criteria

ratings weremparison of s

ofitability

ROE

ROA

Total

E for Return o

chers have co

y criteria. Pri

. The consist

eference ratinomparison ofiquidity

sh Deposit

it Deposit

Total

chers have c

riteria. Priorit

ers. The cons

al preference rmparison of s

nagementBPE

PPE

Total

E for Busines

rchers have co

Management

ratio, so it is

t is less than 0mparison of a

alternatives a

criteria for co

at HDFC is

k has the hig

tency ratio is

te Governanc

mpared all th

rately preferre

rity vector va

s. The cons

onsistent.ub- criterias o

n equity& RO

pared the su

ority vector

ncy ratio is 0

s were consistsub- criterias

C

mpared the s

y vector value

istency ratio i

atings were co ub- criterias o

s per employe

mpared the su

criteria. Prio

ore preferred

.10 it proves tlternatives

CICI

1

2

3

6

e compared w

rporate gover

qually to mo

est value of p

.06 and since

e, CA for Ca

e five criteria

d capital ade

lue of capital

istency ratio

f profitability (ROE

1

2.5

3.5

A for Return o

criterias i.e.

alue of RO

which shows

ent.f Liquidity (Tash Deposit

1

2

3

ub criterias i

of credit depo

s 0 which sho

nsistentf Management

BPE1

0.4

1.4

e ratio & PPE

b criterias i.e

ity vector va

by researche

at original pr

HDF

0.5

1

0.6

2.1

ith each other

ance so they

erately prefe

iority vector f

it is less than

pital Adequac

s with each

quacy over c

adequacy is t

is 0.05 whi

Table 2)

n Assets

Return on equ

is more tha

erfect consist

ble 3)

.e. Cash dep

sit ratio is mo

s Perfect con

(Table 4).

for profit per

. Business per

ue of Busine

s. The consist

ference rating

C

with respect t

are compa

red over ICI

or corporate g

0.10 it proves

! "#

y, L for Liqu

ther with res

rporate gover

e highest , s

h is less tha

ROA

0.4

1

1.4

ity ratio & Re

n ROE, so it

ency and sinc

redit Deposit

0.5

1

1.5

sit ratio & c

re than Cash d

sistency and s

PPE2.5

1

3.5

employee rati

employee rati

ss per emplo

ency ratio is

s were consist

AXIS

0.33

1.5

1

2.83

the corporat

red with crite

CI Bank so a

overnance, so

that original

!!

idity, P for P

ect to the go

ance ,so a va

capital adeq

n 0.10 which

urn on Assets

is more pref

it is less tha

edit deposit r

eposit ratio, s

ince it is les

oo & profit per

ee ratio is

which shows

nt.

governance c

ria. For instan

value of (1/2)

it is the best b

reference rati

#

ofitability &

al. For instan

ue of (1/3) i.

acy is preferr

shows that o

Priority Vector

0.28571

0.71429

1

C.R =0

ratio with res

erred than R

n 0.10 it prov

Priority Vector

0.33333

0.66667

1

C.R= 0

atio with res

it is more pr

s than 0.10 it

Priority Vector0.71429

0.28571

1

C.R =0

employee rati

ore than pro

Perfect consi

Priority Vector

0.17123

0.4414

0.38737

1

C.R = 0.06

riteria, since t

ce researcher

i.e. 0.5 is ass

ank for this cr

gs are consist

M for

e, the

. 0.33

ed the

riginal

ect to

E by

s that

ect to

ferred

roves

o with

it per

stency

ere is

have

igned.

iteria .

nt.


5/7

Capital

AdequacyICICI

HDFC

AXIS

Total

All three a

one sub

ICICI is

same man

for Capital

0.10 it pr

Table 7

Cash deposit

ICIHDF

AXI

Tot

All three

Researche

assigned

bank has t

consistencTable 8

Credit deposit r

ICICI

HDFC

AXIS

Total

All three

Researche

similarly

the highes

consistencTable 9

Return on As

ICICI

HDFC

AXIS

Total

All three

Researche

similarly b

the highes

consistencTable 10

Return on eq

ICICI

HDFC

lternatives are

riteria i.e Cap

Moderately p

er values ha

Adequacy ,

ves that origin

ratio

IC

S

l

alternatives a

s have decide

similarly by

e highest val

ratio is 0.02

tio

alternatives a

s have decide

y using the sc

t value of pri

ratio is 0.05

sets

alternatives ar

s have decide

y using the sc

t value of pri

ratio is 0.00

uity

CICI1

0.67

0.33

1

compared wit

ital adequacy

referred over

e assigned fo

o it is the best

al preference

ICICI

11.6

3

5.6

re compared

that AXIS B

using the scal

e of priority

and since it i

ICICI

1

0.2

0.2

1.4

re compared

d that ICICI B

ale in the sam

ority vector f

and since it i

ICICI

1

1.8

1

3.8

e compared

d that AXIS

ale in the sam

rity vector fo

and since it

ICICI

1

3

HDF1.5

1

0.3

2.8

h each other

atio so they

Axis bank so

rest of the c

bank for this

atings were c

HDF

0.61

3

4.6

with each ot

ank is Moder

in the same

ector for cas

less than 0.1

HDF

5

1

0.5

6.5

with each ot

ank is Stron

e manner val

r Credit dep

s less than 0.1

HDF

0.5

1

0.7

2.3

ith each othe

ank is Equa

manner val

r Return on

is less than 0.1

HDF

0.3

1

C

ith respect to

are compared

a value of 3

mparisons. IC

criteria .The c

onsistent.

C

er with resp

ately preferre

anner values

deposit ratio,

it proves that

C

er with resp

ly preferred

ues have assi

sit ratio , so

it proves th

C

r with respec

lly preferred

es have assig

ssets ratio ,

0 it proves th

C

! "#

AXIS3

3

1

7

the Capital a

with respect t

is assigned.&

ICI bank has

onsistency rati

AXIS

0.330.33

1

1.66

ct to the su

over ICICI

have assigne

so it is the b

original prefe

AXIS

5

2

1

8

ct to the sub

over HDFC

ned for rest o

it is the best

t original pref

AXIS

1

1.3

1

3.3

t to the sub

over ICICI b

ned for rest of

o it is the be

at original pre

AXIS

0.25

0.33

!!

equacy criteri

it . Research

similarly by u

he highest val

o is 0.01 and

criteria i.e.

ank so a valu

for rest of th

st bank for th

rence ratings

criteria i.e.

ank so a valu

the comparis

bank for this

erence ratings

Pri

riteria ie Ret

ank so a valu

the comparis

st bank for thi

erence ratings

#

Priority Vector

0.48648

0.37194

0.14158

1

C.R =0.01

, since there i

rs have decid

sing the scale

ue of priority

since it is les

Priority Vector

0.171240.23398

0.59479

1

C.R =0.02

Cash deposit

e of (1/3) i.e.

e comparisons

is sub-criterio

ere consistent

Priority Vector

0.70284

0.18223

0.11493

1

C.R =0.05

redit deposit

of 5 is assig

ons. ICICI ba

sub-criterion

were consiste

rity Vector

0.26775

0.43289

0.29936

1

C.R =0.008rn on Assets

of 1 is assig

ns. HDFC ba

s sub-criterio

were consist

Priority Vector

0.12005

0.27154

s only

d that

in the

vector

s than

ratio.

.33 is

. Axis

n. The

.

ratio.

ned.&

k has

.The

nt.

ratio.

ned &

nk has

.The

nt.


6/7

AXIS

Total

All three a

bank has t

.The consiTable 11

Profit peemploye

ICICI

HDFC

AXIS

Total

All three

Researche

similarly bhighest val

it is less thTable 12

Business pemploye

ICICI

HDFC

AXIS

Total

All three a

Researche

.Axis ban

criteria. T

consistentStep 3: Cal

After calc

Weight (p

Global we

Weight ( p

Lastly by

highest valCalculatio

Criteri

CorporaGoverna

Capital Ade

Liquidit

lternatives ar

he highest val

stency ratio is

r

0.

1.

lternatives ar

s have decide

y using the scue of priority

an 0.10 it pro

erICI

lternatives are

s have decide

has the high

e consistency

culation of Glo

lation of Con

iority vector

ight value . Fo

riority vector

dding the glo

ue will have tof Global wei

Loc

wei

tece

0.0

quacy 0.2

y 0.1

4

8

compared wi

ue of priority

0.06 and since

ICICI

1

0.25

333333

583333

compared w

d that AXIS B

le in the samevector for Pro

es that origina

I

1

0.33

3

4.33

compared wit

d that HDFC

st value of pr

ratio is 0.06

bal weights &

sistency ratio

alue) of each

r each alternat

alue) of each

al weight of

e highest ratihts (Table 13)

al

ht

Sub- cri

8

7

Capit

Adequ

Rati

1Cash D

Rati

3

4.3

h each other

vector for Ret

it is less tha

HDF

4

1

2

7

ith each other

ank is Mode

manner valueit per employ

l preference ra

HDF

3

1

4

8

h each other

ank is Mod

iority vector f

nd since it i

ating of Alter

or each pair

sub- criteria

ives global we

alternative wit

ach alternativ

g & will be c

teria Loc

weig

al

acy

o

-

posito

0.3

ith respect t

urn on equity

0.10 it prove

C

with respect

ately preferre

s have assignee, so it is the

tings were co

C

ith respect to

erately preferr

or Businessp

s less than 0.1

atives

ise comparis

ith its paren

ights value ha

h that of Glob

for each sub

nsidered as th

l

ht

Global w

0.07

0.29

0.05

! "#

1

1.58

the sub crite

ratio, so it is

s that original

AXIS

3

0.5

1

4.5

to the sub cri

over ICICI

d for rest of test bank. The

sistent.

AXIS

0.33

0.25

1

1.58

the sub criteri

ed over ICI

r employee ,

0 it proves th

n matrix. Res

ts criterias p

ve to be deter

al weight valu

criteria / crit

e best bank

eight Alter

ICH

A

IC

H

A

ICH

A

!!

ia i.e. Return

he best bank

preference rati

eria i.e Profit

bank so a valu

e comparisonsconsistency r

a i.e. Business

I bank so a v

so it is the be

at original pre

earchers have

riority vector

ined. So we

calculated ab

rias the alter

atives L

Pri

ICIFC

IS

00

0

ICI

FC

IS

0

0

0

ICIFC

IS

0.1

0.2

0.6

#

0.60841

1C.R = 0.06

on equity rati

or this sub-cr

ngs were cons

Priority Vector

0.62322

0.13729

0.23949

1

C.R = 0.02

per employee

e of 3 is assig

. ICICI banktio is 0.02 an

Priority Vector

0.27216

0.11970

0.60814

1

C.R = 0.06

per Employe

lue of 3 is as

st bank for thi

ference rating

multiplied the

alue in order

multiplied the

ove.

native which

cal

ority

Global

.17

.44

.39

0.0.

0.

.49

.37

.14

0.

0.11

0.0

3

0.

0.01

0.03

Axis

iterion

istent.

ratio.

ned &

as thesince

ratio.

signed

s sub-

were

Local

to get

Local

as the

Priority

133343

304

147

1

2

09

22

19


7/7

Profitability

Managem

Table 14A (Banks)

ICICI

HDFC

AXIS

A-Alterna

For each

have the h

Axis Bank

ConclusThe Resea

hierarchy

best in the

Bank & la

Referen

1) Dejan eUniversity of2) Javalgi, R

of consumer

3) Jeff Kunz,

4)Khwanruth

Environment5) Maggie C.

international

6) Saaty, T.

7) Tihomir

informatics,

0.2

ent0.2

CG

0.0133 0.

0.0343 0.

0.0304 0.

ives, CDR- C

lternative we

ighest rating f

& lastly HDF

onrchers are able

tructure base

criterias & s

stly by HDFC

es

huli, Tihomir HZagreb, Croatia.jshekhar G., Ar

ank selection de

2010, The Analyt

ai Bunruamkaew,

l Sciences, Univ.Y. Tama, V.M.

ournal of manag

., 2008, Multicri t

unjak, Drago Ja

niversity of Zagr

Credit D

Rati

2Return onAssets

ReturnEqui

2 Busines

Emplo

Profit

Emplo

A

CDR

.147 0.009

.111 0.012

.042 0.031

sh deposit rati

add the value

llowed by oth

C Bank.

to identify th

on AHP mo

ub-criterias.

Bank.

njak, Nina Begiacost, Robert L.

isions, Journal of

ic Hierarchy Proc

2012 ,How to do

rsity of Tsukubaao Tummala,200

ment science, Eas

ria Decision Mak

kovevi, 2001,

eb.

posit

o 0.67

0.71

onty

0.2

s Per

yee0.71

Per

yee

0.2

L

Cr DR

0.0755

0.0194

0.0161

o & Cr DR- C

horizontally

er banks. ICI

objectives, c

el. Also On t

ICICI bank h

evi, 2011, Com

osseini, Jamshid

Business Resear

ss, Eagle City H

AHP Analysis in

1,: An application

tern Michigan Un

ing: The Analytic

AHP based mod

0.10

0.17

0.070

0.200

0.081

ROE

0.008

0.019

0.043

redit Deposit

& get the tot

I Bank has th

iteria & sub c

e basis of the

s the highest

parison of a Ban

C,1989, Using th

h, Vol 19, Issue 1

ll Location Optio

Excel , Division

of the AHP in v

iversity.

Hierarchy Proces

l for bank perfo

! "#

IC

HA

ICICI

HA

2ICH

A

2ICH

A

9

IC

H

A

P

ROA

0.046

0.074

0.052

atio

l values. The

e highest total

iterias releva

model we are

verall total, i

k's Financial Rati

e analytic hierarc

, pp. 33-49,

ns Task Force

of Spatial Inform

ndor selection of

s, RWS Publicati

rmance evaluatio

!!

ICI

FCIS 0.

0.

0.

FCIs

00

ICIFC

IS

0.1

0.2

0.6

ICIFC

IS

0.2

0.1

0.6

ICI

FC

IS

0.6

0.1

0.2

M

BPE

0.0541

0.0244

0.1221

bank having t

, and the high

nt for rating th

able to analy

s rated the bes

ios Using the An

hy process for ba

tion Science ,Gr

a telecommunica

ns, 4922 Ellswort

n and rating, Fac

#

7

18

15

0.075

0.019

0.016

.27

.43

.3

0.046

0.07

0.052

1

0.008

0.019

0.043

1

0.05

0.02

0.122

0.051

0.011

0.02

PPE

0.0507 0.

0.0114 0.

0.0196 0.

he highest tot

st rank, follo

e banks & dev

e which bank

t followed by

lytic Hierarchy

k management:

duate School of

ions system, Om

h Ave., Pittsburg

ulty of organizat

5

4

1

otal

4036

3053

3571

al will

ed by

elop a

is the

AXIS

rocess,

nalysis

ife and

ga The

,

ion and

0

0

0

drharshpurohi mansi mathur

Documents