drug screening
TRANSCRIPT
1
Student: 黃德偉 5-Year Impact factor : 3.231
Instructor: 楊智惠教授 PubMed ID: 18358729
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.03.004 ISSN: 0968-0896
Impact factor:2.951
2
Outline • Introduction
• FRET TripleHelicalPeptides substrate assay (fTHP)
• Primary HTS assay
• Secondary HTS assay
• Compound analysis
3
Introduction• Osteoarthritis (OA) is an age-related debilitating disease affecting more than 80% of people over the age of 75.
• Cartilage destruction associated with OA has been shown to be due to increased catabolism rather than decreased synthesis.
• However, Matrix MetalloProtease (MMP) family has several members that can cleave collagen.
4
Introduction• Proteases with potential roles in OA include MMP-1,MMP-13, and members of the a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs.
• MMP-13 is believed to be the more prominent collagenase than MMP-1 in OA.
• Goal of OA researchers is the design of selective MMP-13 inhibitors.
5
Introduction• Established using FRET substrates with Mca as fluorophore and Dnp as quencher
• Triple Helical Peptides(THP) substrates identify unique MMP-13 inhibitors due to distinct conformational features that interact with secondary binding sites found within MMPs.
Adopted from : Biomol.Chem.2010;8,1237-1258
6
Introduction• Can be utilized for the identification of non-active site-binding inhibitors.
• Exosites have been shown to represent unique opportunities for the design of selective inhibitors
• Initial clinical trials with MMP inhibitors were disappointing, with one of the problematic features being a lack of selectivity.
• Selective exosite-binding inhibitors for MMP-13 could represent a potential next generation in metalloproteinase therapeutics for OA.
7
FRET THP substrate assay(fTHP)
Mca(7-methoxycoumarin-4-yl)acetyl
Dnp 2,4-dinitrophenyl
Cleave by MMP-family
Signal detected
Adopted from Eurogentec
8
Primary HTS campaign to identify inhibitors of MMP-13
S/B : 2.4 ± 0.04 (n = 52 plates)
Average Z′-factor :0.82 ± 0.06
10
MMP-13 primary HTS campaign scattergram
The negative inhibition scatter is attributed to the substrate fluorophore (7-methoxycoumarin) excitation wavelength, making the primary HTS campaign assay prone to the interference from fluorescent compoundsFigure 2. MMP-13 primary HTS campaign scattergram. Graphed are the percent
inhibition values for every well tested in the primary HTS campaign.
11
Primary HTS assay frequency distribution analysis
Fig3. (A) with fluorescent artifacts
Mean inhibition value of 0.833% ± 0.031 (R2 = 0.990; n = 64,928)
Fluorescent compounds within the screening file.
12
Primary HTS assay frequency distribution analysis
Fig3. (B) without the fluorescent artifacts
Mean inhibition value of 0.835% ± 0.026 (R2 = 0.993; n = 59,470)
13
Identify inhibitors of MMP-13 within the large subset of autofluorescent compounds found in the primary HTS campaign
14
Secondary screen of MMP-13 inhibitorsTable 3.Compounds examined in the secondary screen
• An RP-HPLC based secondary screen was performed on 30 of these compounds.
• one single-stranded (Knight fSSP) • one triple-helical (fTHP-15)
Result• Compounds C, R, V, W, A′, C′ best
inhibitors • Compounds J and L were better
inhibitors against the SSP substrate• Compound Q was a better inhibitor
against the THP substrate.
25 in
hibited
MMP-13 a
ctivi
ty
15
Structure similarity
Figure 5 Bioactivity clustering (structure–activity analysis) of 42 compounds tested in dose–response experiment for non-fluorescent compounds. Results from a cheminformatics tool contained within the PubChem website are shown.
Red arrow indicates columns containing MMP-13 primary HTS and dose–response experiment results.
Figure 4 Inhibition of MMP-13 by 30 different compounds, as monitored by RP-HPLC and fluorescence spectroscopy. The change in RP-HPLC peak areas or relative fluorescence units for 10 nM MMP-13 hydrolysis of 10 μM fTHP-15 or 5 μM Knight fSSP was monitored
17
Relative percent activity of MMPs in the presence of 100 μ M inhibitorInhibitor MMP-1 MMP-2 MMP-3 MMP-8 MMP-9 MMP-12 MMP-13C 25 7 63 2 14 2 4 Broad spectrumE 47 49 96 50 27 21 35 ExceptionH 96 100 100 100 100 100 36 Effective against MMP- 8&13M 85 19 96 34 27 33 35 Effective against MMP-13Q 94 100 96 80 99 100 62 Effective against MMP-2&13R 27 17 87 8 3 1 14T 68 100 75 32 100 75 45 Based onV 91 0 43 10 0 0 15 1.Relative level of inhibition
W 98 47 97 80 66 72 25 2.Uniqueness of substrate profile
X 93 100 92 94 100 92 42A′ 96 73 95 36 75 64 35C′ 88 80 90 100 81 94 44
12 subset of MMP-13 inhibitor for counter screening
18MVC
E R5,5-disubstitutedpyrimidine-2,4,6-triones
General class MMP inhibitors.
Bind to MMP active site Zn2+
19
Similar
X ThiazolopyrimidineMMP-13 selective inhibitor
Q WWarner-Lambert pyrimidinediones
similar+
Effective against MMP-13 triple-helical peptidase activity compared with MMP-13 single-stranded peptidase activity
21
References• Pictures sources : Wikipedia, Eurogentec, Biomol.Chem
• J. Liquid Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 26 (2003), pp. 2225–2254
• Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med., 4 (1993), pp. 197–250
• Osteoarthr. Cartilage, 11 (2003), pp. 801–809
• Arthritis Res., 4 (2002), pp. 157–164
• Expert Opin. Ther. Patents, 15 (2005), pp. 253–269
• Biochemistry, 40 (2001), pp. 5795–5803