eRHIC IR CONSTRAINS FROM PHYSICS

E.C. Aschenauer

arXiv: 1212.1701

arXiv:1409.1633

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20152

REQUIREMENTS TO REALIZE THE PROGRAM

E.C. Aschenauer

Requirements from Physics:

High Luminosity ~ 1033 cm-2s-1 and higher Flexible center of mass energy 20 to 100 GeV upgradable to 140 GeV Electrons and protons/light nuclei (p, He3 or D) highly polarized Wide range of nuclear beams (D to Au, U, Pb) a wide acceptance detector with good PID (e/h and p, K, p) wide acceptance for protons from elastic reactions and neutrons from nuclear breakup

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20153

THE MODEL DETECTOR

low Q2

taggerand

luminositydetector

Hadron PID:-1<h<1: proximity focusing LiF (Aerogel)-RICH (CLEO) + TPC: dE/dx1<|h|<3: Dual-radiator RICH (Aerogel + C4F10) (modeled: LHC-b RICH-I)

Lepton-ID: -3 <h< 3: e/p 1<|h|<3: in addition Hcal response & g suppression via tracking|h|>3: ECal+Hcal response & g suppression via tracking

-4<h<4: Tracking (TPC+GEM+MAPS) MAPS: CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors

+h-h

E.C. Aschenauer

ToRoman Pots

&Zero DegreeCalorimeter

hadron beamlepton beam

Machine clear space +/- 4.5 m around IP

detector components down to 2o

Detector magnet aligned with lepton beam

backgrounds due to synchrotron and beam gas events have to

be kept at a minimum

Detector fully model in GeantHcal m-vertexEcal GEMRICH TPC

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20154 E.C. Aschenauer

eRHIC:Interaction Regionandancillary detector systems:

hadron and lepton polarimetersluminosity detectorlow Q2 taggerZDC and Roman Pot systems

all needed from the beginning

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 20155

REQUIREMENTS FROM PHYSICS ON IR

E.C. Aschenauer

Summarized at: https://wiki.bnl.gov/eic/index.php/IR_Design_Requirements

Hadron Beam:1. the detection of neutrons of nuclear break up in the outgoing

hadron beam direction location/acceptance of ZDC2. the detection of the scattered protons from exclusive and

diffractive reaction in the outgoing proton beam direction the detection of the spectator protons from 3He and Deuterium

location/acceptance of RP; 3. space for hadron and local polarimetry

Lepton Beam:4. minimize impact of detector magnetic field on lepton beam

synchrotron radiation5. space for low Q2 scattered lepton detection6. space for the luminosity monitor in the outgoing lepton beam

direction7. space for lepton polarimetry

Important

eRHIC is a high luminosity machine 1033-34 cm-2s-1

such controlling systematics becomes crucial

luminosity measurement

lepton and hadron polarization measurement

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 2015

EXCLUSIVE REACTIONS

6

Large Rapidiy Gap method

o MX system and e’ measured

o Proton dissociation backgroundo High acceptance in h for detector

two methods: to select events

Need for HCal in the forward

region

E.C. Aschenauer

Cuts: Q2>1 GeV, 0.01<y<0.85 DVCS – photon kinematics:

proton/neutron tag method

o Measurement of t o Free of p-diss backgroundo Higher MX rangeo to have high acceptance for Roman Pots / ZDC challenging IR design

Need for Roman Pots

(RP)and

Zero Degree Calorimeter

(ZDC)

detector acceptance: h>4.5

increasing Hadron Beam Energy: influences max. photon energy at fixed hphotons are boosted to negative rapidities (lepton direction)

ROMAN POT STUDY – HOW CLOSE TO THE BEAM CAN WE GO?

expected beam width calculation

from table 3-1 in design report and the attached figure obtained from Dejan of the beta function beta_x = 2014m (at z=18m) beta_y = 3465m (at z=18m) epsilon (normalized) = 0.2e-6m gamma = 270 (for 250GeV protons)

eRHIC Brainstorming Meeting, BNL, Aug. 20138

DVCS WITH A FACTOR 10 LESS LUMI

E.C. Aschenauer

10 < Q2 < 17.78 GeV2

0.1 < x < 0.158

~ 1 year for EIC-WP eRHIC

EIC-WP Plotslope generated exponential in tdipole-fit: c2/dof = 17.2

statistics for t > 0.8 basically not existent cannot distinguish exp. from dipole shape

Study by S. Fazio

remember: t ~ pt2 of the forward

going scattered proton

pt = p cosΘ acceptance in theta limited by beam acceptance and beta-fct as the beam stay clear region is defined by them

9

|t| > 0.018 GeV2

5 GeV x 100 GeV

DVCS WITH A FACTOR 10 LESS LUMI

E.C. Aschenauer

high t low buncertainty does not yet accounted thatexp. shape cannot be determined from dipole

the t dependence can be transformed to a bt dependence through a Fourier transform

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201510

IMPACT OF BEAM EMITTANCE

E.C. Aschenauer

difference in unfolded bt spectrum based on lowest t accessiblept > 300 MeV vs. 200 MeVeven higher pt cuts would be bad

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201511

KINEMATICS OF BREAKUP NEUTRONS

E.C. Aschenauer

Results from GEMINI++ for 50 GeV Au

+/-5mrad acceptance seems sufficient

Important:• For coherent VM-production rejection power of incoherent needed up to 104

ZDC detection efficiency is critical

Can we reconstruct the eA collision geometry:

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201512

LUMINOSITY MEASUREMENTConcept: Use Bremsstrahlung ep epg as reference cross section

different methods: o Bethe Heitler, QED Compton, Pair Production

Hera: reached 1-2% systematic uncertainty

Goals for Luminosity Measurement: Integrated luminosity with precision δL< 1% Measurement of relative luminosity: physics-asymmetry/10

eRHIC challenges: with 1033 cm-2s-1 one gets on average 23 bremsstrahlungs photons/bunch for proton beam A-beam Z2-dependence this will challenge single photon measurement under 0o

E.C. Aschenauer

zero degree photon calorimeterhigh rate measured energy proportional to # photons subject to synchrotron radiation

additional pair spectrometerlow rate The calorimeters are outside of the primary synchrotron radiation fan The spectrometer geometry low energy cutoff in the photon spectrum, depends on dipole field and calorimeter transverse location

LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – THE ep->epg PROCESS

Two estimates of the expected angular distrubition of Bremsstrahlung photons Bethe-Heitler calculation

DJANGOH MC simulation

relative scaling (please ignore numbers on yaxis)

Bethe-HeitlerDJANGOH

• typical angle of emission is less than 0.03mrad• though there is a

fairly long tail to the distribution

• roughly factor of 10 less than contribution from beam divergence for top energy ep collisions (see next slide)

LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – BEAM OPTICS

calculation of the angular beam divergence (in radians)

sigma_theta = angular beam divergence epsilon = (normalized) emittance (taken from table 3-1 of the

design report) gamma = lorentz factor beta* = beam optics parameter at IP (5cm taken from table 3-

1) for 20x250 GeV e+p collisions

for other beam conditions

LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – ADDITIONAL EFFECT OF BEAM STEERING

considering the added effect if the IP moves a bit and is off center look at DJANGOH ep->epg events fed into EicRoot both curves include crossing angle (10 mrad) and angular beam

divergence (0.1mrad) and a flat z vertex spread of +/- 2.5cm black has all events at (0,0) (x,y) vertex red has events with (x,y) vertex distributed flat with +/- 0.5cm note that in this definition, the electron going direction is 0

degrees

LUMINOSITY MONITOR STUDY – NEEDED APERTURE

will need roughly +/- 1 to 2 mrad of aperture for bremsstrahlung photons for lumi measurement depends strongly on beam optics, not so much on

the actual physics process do we have that much space?

I think yes in the current design (depending on exactly how far down the lumi system is installed)

EIC R&D Meeting January 201517

eRHIC: IR DESIGN

E.C. Aschenauer

e-Beam

Hadrons

synrad

Matching 16 mrad bends

“D0”

Cryostat

Cryostat

Cryostat CryostatCryostat

Cryostat

Plan View of IR Layout

10 mradcrossing

DetectorRegion

(e-beamaligned)

Philosophy: detect forward particles in the warm section between the IR magnets and Crab Cavities

ZDC

RomanPots

Design: compromises physics and machine requirements

low Q2 tagger (not to scale)

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201518

eRHIC IR

E.C. Aschenauer

Extended IR region and by pass modeled in Geant

low Q2-tagger RP

• gain acceptance with a station very far down (>40m)• still need to model this

• seems to be lost in magnet yoke

• can work with CAD to improve

-6 < θ < -5 mrad-5 < θ < -4 mrad-4 < θ < -3 mrad-3 < θ < -2 mrad-2 < θ < -1 mrad-1 < θ < 0 mrad 0 < θ < 1 mrad

e-polarimeter andluminosity detector are next to be integrated in IR andmodeled in Geant

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201519

eRHIC HADRON POLARIMETRY

Polarized hydrogen Jet Polarimeter (HJet)Source of absolute polarization (normalization for other polarimeters)Slow (low rates needs looong time to get precise measurements)

Proton-Carbon Polarimeter (pC) @ RHIC and AGS Very fast main polarization monitoring toolMeasures polarization bunch profile and lifetimeNeeds to be normalized to HJet

Local Polarimeters at Experiments sits between spin rotatorsCritical to define spin direction at experiments can use the concept of pCAll of these systems are necessary for the

proton beam polarization measurements and monitoring

E.C. Aschenauer

All the equipment is existing from RHIC with years

of operating experience

NEED to make sure the methods continue to work

eRHIC NSAC Cost Review 201520

572 nm pulsed laser laser transport system laser light polarization

measured continuously

Considerations: Measure Polarization directly at IP

overlap of bremsstrahlungs and compton photons location, where bremsstrahlung contribution is small and synchrotron radiation is minimized

Measure after / before IP need to measure at location spin is fully longitudinal or transverse

1/6 turn should rotate spin by integer number of π constrain on location

Polarimeter technology needs to allow to have precision to measure polarisation correlated to bunch #, gatling gun cathode #, colliding proton bunch #

need to still integrate electron polarimeter fully into machine lattice / IR

ELECTRON POLARIMETER

E.C. Aschenauer

Method: Compton backscattering longitudinal polarization Energy asymmetry transverse polarization position asymmetry

segmented Calorimeter to measure both components

HERA LPol:achieved systematic uncertainty 1.4%