energy best mix for road transportation in indonesia
TRANSCRIPT
UGMToyota/TMMIN/TMAP-EM
PT PertaminaMizuho Information & Research Institute
16 December 2013
UGMToyota/TMMIN/TMAP-EM
PT PertaminaMizuho Information & Research Institute
16 December 2013
Energy Best Mix for Road Transportation in Indonesia
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1971
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
百万
バレル
/日
百万
バレル
/日
百万
バレル
/日
百万
バレル
/日
� It is only a transportation sector which oil demand increases greatly.� The number of the car ownership is a huge expansion in ASEAN.� It is necessary to make a `Energy Best Mix in Transp ort Sector` to
reduce the fuel consumption, CO2 etc.
Oil Demand and Vehicle Population
Transportation
Domestic/ business use
Industry
Power Generation
Petrochemistry
(出典)(出典)(出典)(出典)IEA
Oil demand according to usage Vehicle population
0
100
200
300
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2050
(Million)
ASEAN
0
2
4
6
8
10
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Indonesia(thousand)
3
Energy Supply/Demand in Indonesia
�Indonesia depended on Import Oil since 2004. �Well balanced Energy Mix is promoted.�Quite high New and Renewable Energy share is targeted in 2025.
Oil
Coal
Gas
GeothermalHydro Power
2006
Oil
CoalGas
NRE 17%
NRE: New and Renewable Energy
2025 Target
Bio Fuel : 5%Biomass,Nuclear,hydro/Solar/Wind:5%Geothermal: 5%Liquefaction Coal: 2%
What should be done to achieve the policy target?
Supply
Demand
Gap
Oil Supply/Demand in Indonesia
4
Expansion of Our Activity (Transport Sector)
Finally, it is necessary to make theASEAN energy grid .
1st Step
�Making the Model�Study in Indonesia
2nd Step
�Study in each countryin ASEAN
3rd Step
�Study of ASEAN Energy Best Mix�ASEAN Energy Grid
It is necessary to study about the optimum energy mix in each country .
Energy situation is quite different in each country .
Make the model and execute the studyin Indonesia .
5
Energy Best Mix in Indonesia
TargetMinimization of Energy consumption , CO2 emission and Fiscal expenditure (include investment in infrastructure).
Best Energy Balance Scenario
Vehicle population, Travel distance, FE etc.
Gasoline/Diesel fuel/CNG/Bio rate
Infrastructure cost, Subsidy etc.
Making the Model �Develop the model which examine the influence of fuel. *Base is IEA/SMP model
�A peculiar condition on each country is used
6
INDONESIAN OIL PRODUCTION
Business as usualOn-going projectsOld fieldsCepu Block
OptimizationMarginal fieldsNew fieldsNew potential
Annu
al Oi
l Pro
ducti
on
(thou
snad
sof b
arre
ls)
Indon
esian
Minis
try of
Energ
y & M
ineral
Resou
rces
7
Fossil Fuel 2009 2010 Annual Production
Yearsd
Oila,b 7.99 BBO 7.76 MBO 0.345 BBO 14Gasa,c 159TSCF 157 TSCF 3.23 TSCF 22Coalb 125 BT 126.2 BT 327 MT 49
NATIONAL ENERGY POTENTIAL
a BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2011b Indonesian Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resourcesc BP Migasd 7% annual increase of energy consumption
Limited reserves requires measures to extend resource
availibility
Energy mix
8
Model
9
�Model development�Mode:::: Passenger car, Freight car
→ Passenger Car, Bus, Truck, Motorcycle�Fuel:::: Gasoline, Diesel, CNG, Biofuel�Period:::: Present - 2030�Output:::: Energy consumption, WtoW CO2 emission,
Cost evaluation (expense by government by subsidy, infra cost, …)�Base model:::: IEA/SMP model ※※※※SMP: Sustainable Mobility Project
MODEL DESCRIPTION
10
�IEA SMP model�Calculation Method :::: ASIF
Activity(km/year)
Structure(mode and
vehicle type)
Intensity(fuel efficiency)
Fuel type(gasoline, diesel…)
×××× ×××× ××××
====
Fuel use CO2 emission
Length a vehicle runs
Length a vehicle runs
By car, by rail, by bus, ...
By car, by rail, by bus, ...
Fuel efficiency(ℓ/km))))
Fuel efficiency(ℓ/km))))
Gasoline, Diesel, CNG ...((((gCO2/ℓ))))Gasoline, Diesel, CNG ...((((gCO2/ℓ))))
Energy consumption ((((ℓ))))CO2 emission ((((gCO2))))
Energy consumption ((((ℓ))))CO2 emission ((((gCO2))))
MODEL DESCRIPTION
11
�Cost evaluationFor cost evaluation, expense such as subsidy, infr astructure building and
maintenance cost are taken into account. In this stu dy we focused on expense
by government.
� Subsidy :::: Gasoline, Diesel, Ethanol, Biodiesel
� Infrastructure building: Gasoline station, CNG stat ion,
Renovation cost for biofuel supply
�Maintenance: Gasoline station, CNG station
� Benefit loss: benefit loss due to domestic CNG usage instead of LNG Export
�CNG kit distribution :::: Subsidy for remodeling for CNG usage
MODEL DESCRIPTION
12
AREA BASED ENERGY MIX SCENARIO
13
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT PROJECTION
14
POPULATION PROJECTION
Regional population data projection beyond 2010 based on IEEJ (2011)
1999-2010
2010-2020
2020-2030
Sumatra 1.4% 1.1% 1.0%
Java 0.9% 0.7% 0.4%
Kalimantan 1.6% 1.3% 1.1%
Sulawesi 1.2% 0.9% 0.7%
Nusa Tenggara
1.2% 0.9% 0.7%
Papua 2.5% 2.4% 2.2%
15
INCOME AND VEHICLE OWNERSHIP
16
Scenarios
17
SCENARIO 0 : BAU SCENARIO
� Biofuel mixture follows Ministry of Energy Regulations
� No CNG vehicles� No vehicles utilizing new fuel efficient technologies
� Fuel subsidy maintained at 2013 level
18
Validation of Model CalculationsBAU SCENARIO
Cost of Fuel SubsidiesLiters Consumed
19
BAU SCENARIO
Jenis Sektor 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2025
Transportasi PSO 0% 0.5% 1% 2% 5% 20%
Transportasi Non-PSO 1% 1% 2% 5% 10% 20%
Jenis Sektor 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2025
Transportasi PSO 10% 10% 10% 20% 20% 25%
Transportasi Non-PSO 3% 10% 10% 20% 20% 25%
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No, 25 Year 2013on the Revision of Regulation No. 32 Year 2008 conc erning
The Provision, Utilization and Commerce of Biofuels as Alternative Fuels
Mandatory Biodiesel Usage
Mandatory Bioethanol Usage
20
BAU SCENARIOEnergy Consumption based on Vehicle Type
100 billion liters by 2030!!
21
Energy Consumption based on Fuel TypeBAU SCENARIO
100 billion liters by 2030!!
22
BAU SCENARIOCO2 emissions based on Vehicle Type
23
Projected Annual Transportation Energy Costs(exc. Infrastructure costs)
BAU SCENARIO
24
Subsidy for Biodiesel
Subsidy for Diesel
Subsidy for Gasoline
TOTAL : 4,772,186 billion IDR
Station cost and maintenance
Total costs 2005 � 2030BAU SCENARIO
Subsidy for ethanol
25
SCENARIO 1 : SUBSIDY WITHDRAWAL
� No CNG vehicles
� Biofuel mixture follows Ministry of Energy Regulations� Gradual fuel subsidy withdrawal with zero fossil fuel subsidy at 2020
� Biofuel subsidy maintained at 2013 levels
� No vehicles utilizing new fuel efficient technologies
26
SUBSIDY WITHDRAWAL SCENARIOProjected Annual Transportation Energy Costs (exc. Infrastructure costs)
Reduction of subsidies reduces annual cost significantly
However …• Dependency on imported oil
remains a problem• High oil based fuel price will
be a burden on consumers
Subs
idy W
ithdr
awal
BAU
27
Subsidy for Biodiesel
Subsidy for Diesel
Subsidy for Gasoline
TOTAL : 1,789,770 billion IDR
Subsidy for Ethanol
Station cost and maintenance
Total costs 2005 � 2030
Removal of subsidies may allow accelerated development of infrastructure for alternative fuel types (i.e. CNG)
SUBSIDY WITHDRAWAL SCENARIO
28
� Sale of new fuel efficient technology cars up to 55% of cars sold in 2025
� Sale of new CNG four wheeled vehicles begins at 0.5% of annual vehicle sales in 2016 up to 45% of vehicles sold in 2030
SCENARIO 2: ENERGY MIX SCENARIO� Biofuel timeline according to Ministry of Energy regulations
� Subsidies assumed to be maintained at 2013 level
� The initial 0.5% CNG vehicles sold (around 4500 vehicles) assumes initial adoption only by taxi companies and public transport
29
ENERGY MIX SCENARIOEnergy consumption
Mix
BAU
Introduction of CNG and fuel efficient vehicles results in a 3 % decrease of energy consumption by 2030
Measures must be taken to hold back increase of energy consumptione.g. vehicle retirement initiatives
• Energy consumption remains high
• Low number of CNG vehicles means consumption of gasoline/diesel still high
Gasoline consumed by fuel efficient vehicles
30
Mix
BAU
Projected Annual Transportation Energy Costs(exc. Infrastructure costs)
ENERGY MIX SCENARIO
By 2030, an annual cost reduction of 3% has been achieved
31
Subsidy for Biodiesel
Subsidy for DieselSubsidy for Gasoline
TOTAL : 4,812,123 billion IDR
Subsidy for Ethanol
CNG station cost
ENERGY MIX SCENARIOBAU Subsidy
Withdrawal Energy Mix
32
EFFECT OF RETIREMENT
Energy consumptionCar/truck/bus retirement can potentially hold back the increase of energy consumption by 20% in 2030
However, due to no motorcycle retirement, energy consumption by motorcycles remains high
A retirement scheme for ALL VEHICLE TYPES should be
adopted
Lower energy consumption will extend lifetime of resources
Cars retired after 19 years
A possible scenario with cars retired after 19 years of service
Retir
emen
t BA
U
33
Conclusion
34
CONCLUSIONTargetMinimization of Energy consumption, CO2 emission and Fiscal expenditure (include investment in infrastructure).
Achieved by energy mix scenario in 2030� Annual energy consumption decreased by 3 %� Annual CO2 emissions unchanged
� Annual cost reduced by 3% , Total cost relatively unchanged
Due to CNG and fuel efficient technology being introduced only via new car sales, Old low efficiency vehicles remain and thus still consume large amounts of energy.
The dominant numbers of old vehicles still consume a large amount of gasoline and diesel fuel which in turn retains the large subsidy cost
Measures to reduce energy consumption and cost must consider presence of old vehicles
Achieved by subsidy withdrawal scenario by 2030� Annual cost decreased by 87 %� Total cost decreased by 63 %
35
RECOMMENDATIONS
� Biofuel usage must be continually pursued with adequate subsidy to reduce oil dependency
� Older vehicles can only use lower content biofuels (below E10/B7)�Availability of both low and high content biofuels should be considered
� If fuel subsidy is removed, freed budget may be allocated for alternative fuel infrastructure (CNG infrastructure) or to subsidize CNG conversion kits to increase feasibility of the CNG alternative and to build road infrastructure to reduce traffic congestion especially in big cities.
Measures to reduce energy consumption and cost must consider presence of old vehicles
� To improve overall vehicle population, old vehicles must then :� Retired via regulatory requirements (can reduce energy consumption by 23%) to be
replaced by fuel efficient vehicles
36
FUTURE WORK
� Construct vehicle retirement model for varying degrees of retirement� Consumer behavior study to observe policies that
may improve alternative fuel adoption� Include effects of congestion on fuel consumption
(will result in different fuel economy for congested cities)
Thank you