environment leadership - dartmouth.educushman/courses/engs171/xerox.pdf · xerox corporation agenda...
TRANSCRIPT
XEROXEnvironment Leadership
Anne StocumEnvironment, Health & Safety
Xerox Corporation
Agenda
Xerox Business
Areas of Concern & ProgressSome examples
Toward Sustainability
Xerox is the global leader in the document management business, offering the most innovative array of document products, services and solutions in the industry.
Markets:• High End Production Printing • Networked Offices• Services
•Primary Technologies:•Electrophotography = Xerography•Inkjet - Solid, Liquid
•Print, Copy, Scan, Fax•Supplies (Paper, Toner Cartridges)•Software Solutions
•Photo-optics•Materials•Electronics (Digital) Architecture
What is Xerography?
Webster’s Definition:A process for copying graphic matter by the action of light
on an electrically charged photoconductive insulating surfacein which the latent image is developed with a resinous powder.
XeroXero--graphygraphy = = DryDry--Writing (Greek)Writing (Greek)
The Xerographic Process
Photoreceptor
•Safety of particulates (toner)
•Hazardous materials usage and emissions
•Waste reduction
•Energy Efficiency
•End of life disposition
•Safety of particulates (toner)
•Hazardous materials usage and emissions
•Waste reduction
•Energy Efficiency
•End of life disposition
Areas of Concern
...Most Common to the I.T. Industry
Toner Safety (Particulates)Safety of Toner Questioned in 1979
Near-Term Actions (1979 - 1982)
Identified and eliminated mutagens from carbon black
Set quality standard for carbon black suppliers
U.S. EPA: What are chronic
health effects of Xerox toners?
Long-Term Initiative (1983 - Today)
Xerox Health Studies− To understand chronic
effects of toner inhalation (particulates)
Toner SafetyXerox Health Studies
Mortality Study
Employee Health Study
Rodent Inhalation Study
0
5
10
15
mg/m3
OSHADutchXerox
Workplace ExposureLimits Lowered in 1988
Major Finding No evidence of chronic health effects
due to toner exposure.
Major Benefit Health studies provide a strong basis for the protection of Xerox employees and customers
Xerox: Industry BenchmarkTotal Dust 1/6th OSHA Limit
Resp. Dust 1/12th OSHA Limit
Total Dust Respirable Dust
(Cohort size 35,000) (~7500 employees)
Toner SafetyColor, Small Particles
Xerox’s Core Business over the next 5 years will continue to rely on “mmaarrkkss onon ppaappeerr”
Chemical TonersTechnology Advance - - a new process to
manufacture toners
Chemical TonersTechnology Advance - - a new process to
manufacture toners
•Higher quality color images
•Less energy intensive to produce and use
•Less material / image
Benefits:
•Smaller particle size (5 um)
•New materials
Concerns
New Toxicology Methods
Employed
•Safety of particulates (toner)
Hazardous materials usage and emissions
•Waste reduction
•Energy Efficiency
•End of life disposition
•Safety of particulates (toner)
Hazardous materials usage and emissions
•Waste reduction
•Energy Efficiency
•End of life disposition
Areas of Concern
...Most Common to the I.T. Industry
Material Restrictions / BansAn Increasing Challenge
Res
tric
ted/
Ban
ned
Mat
eria
l
1975 1985 1995 2000 2005
ozoneozone
ozone-depleting substances
some chlorinated solventsNi/Cd batteriessome pigmentscarbon blackvolatile organicsheavy metals (packaging)arsenic
ozone-depleting substances
some chlorinated solventsNi/Cd batteriessome pigmentscarbon blackvolatile organicsheavy metals (packaging)arsenic
polyvinyl chloridepersistent &bioaccumulativechemicalsazo dyesendocrine disruptors?more chlorinated solventssmall particles
polyvinyl chloridepersistent &bioaccumulativechemicalsazo dyesendocrine disruptors?more chlorinated solventssmall particles
asbestosPCBsasbestosPCBs
BannedRegulated
leadhalogenated flameretardantsmercurycadmiumhexavalent chromiumselenium
leadhalogenated flameretardantsmercurycadmiumhexavalent chromiumselenium
Bans/Restrictions Affect:
Electronics Plastic EnclosuresBatteries PackagingImaging Manufacturing Materials Processes
Eco-EfficiencyReduce Hazardous Materials
Replace Metal Alloy Photoreceptors with Organic Photoreceptors (1981 - 1990)
•Selenium, Arsenic •Health concerns•Waste issues
•Selenium, Arsenic •Health concerns•Waste issues
•Eliminated arsenic•Reduced selenium use by >99.5%
•Eliminated arsenic•Reduced selenium use by >99.5%
•Technology advantage•Safe materials •Safe disposal
•Technology advantage•Safe materials •Safe disposal
Eco-EfficiencyReduce Hazardous Materials
Replace Metal Alloy Photoreceptors with Organic Photoreceptors (1981 - 1990)
- Dicholoromethane Exposure limits reduced
- Emissions reduced by 96% since 1991
- Search for substitute unsuccessful
- Dicholoromethane Exposure limits reduced
- Emissions reduced by 96% since 1991
- Search for substitute unsuccessful
Organic Photoreceptor Tradeoff
Dichloromethane: • Organic solvent carrier in manufacturing process• Identified as possible human carcinogen in 1986
Dichloromethane: • Organic solvent carrier in manufacturing process• Identified as possible human carcinogen in 1986
0
400
800
1200
'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00
96% reduction in MeCl2 emissions
Thousands of Lbs Emitted to Air
•Safety of particulates (toner)
•Hazardous materials usage and emissions
Waste reduction
•Energy Efficiency
•End of life disposition
•Safety of particulates (toner)
•Hazardous materials usage and emissions
Waste reduction
•Energy Efficiency
•End of life disposition
Areas of Concern
...Most Common to the I.T. Industry
Xerox ApproachEnvironmental Leadership
Product Safety & Occupational Health
EnvironmentalLeadership
Environmental Awareness
1960’s 1960’s -- 1970’s1970’s 2000’s2000’s
Compliance with
Regulations
Xerox Standards
Applied Worldwide
Most Stringent Regulatory & Consensus Standards Adopted
Comprehensive Policy
Xerox Program Evolved with Growing Environmental Awareness
1980’s 1980’s -- 1990’s1990’s
Waste-free products manufactured in waste-free factories to enable customers’ waste-free workplaces
Xerox Waste Free Goal
Life CycleView
End of Life ManagementEnd of Life
Management
Design and Build
Design and Build
Customer Use
Customer Use
….Introduced in early 1990’s
Waste-free products manufactured in waste-free factories to enable customers’ waste-free workplaces
Waste Free Goal
• Minimal use of hazardous substances
• Low plant emissions • Efficient use of energy
and materials• Parts reuse• Equipment
remanufacture
• Minimal use of hazardous substances
• Low plant emissions • Efficient use of energy
and materials• Parts reuse• Equipment
remanufacture
• Energy efficiency
• Low machine emissions
• Paper-saving features
• Return programs for supplies
• Equipment takeback
• Energy efficiency
• Low machine emissions
• Paper-saving features
• Return programs for supplies
• Equipment takeback• Equipment and parts
recovery
• Materials recycling
• Equipment and parts recovery
• Materials recycling
SupplierRelationships
SupplierRelationships
Life CycleView
End of Life ManagementEnd of Life
Management
Design and Build
Design and Build
Customer Use
Customer Use
Air Emission ReductionsU.S. Toxics Release Inventory
(000’s lbs)
0400800
12001600
'91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '00
Product Energy EfficiencyXerox Energy Star products
enable 600,000 tons of avoided CO2 emissions
160 Million lbs waste diverted from landfill
Waste Free GoalBenefits
1990 2000
55%
Dust1990 2000
70%
Ozone
Reductions in product chemical emissions
Life CycleView
End of Life ManagementEnd of Life
Management
Design and Build
Design and Build
Customer Use
Customer Use
0
80
160
2000
Supplies
Equipment
Remanufacturing & Recycling
80% Recycle RateNon-hazardous Solid Waste
0
25
50
75
100
'90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00
92%
• Energy efficiency
• Low machine emissions
• Paper-saving features
• Return programs for supplies
• Equipment takeback
• Energy efficiency
• Low machine emissions
• Paper-saving features
• Return programs for supplies
• Equipment takeback
Waste-free products manufactured in waste-free factories to enable customers’ waste-free workplaces
Waste Free Goal
• Minimal use of hazardous substances
• Low plant emissions • Efficient use of energy
and materials• Parts reuse• Equipment
remanufacture
• Minimal use of hazardous substances
• Low plant emissions • Efficient use of energy
and materials• Parts reuse• Equipment
remanufacture
• Equipment and parts recovery
• Materials recycling
• Equipment and parts recovery
• Materials recycling
SupplierRelationships
SupplierRelationships
Life CycleView
End of Life ManagementEnd of Life
Management
Design and Build
Design and Build
Customer Use
Customer Use
Energy ManagementOpportunities
Power Modes:
•RUN•STANDBY•LOW POWER•SLEEP•OFF - Auto Off •OFF - Switch Off
• Machine enters energy saving modes automatically
• Machine in these modes 80% of time
• Machines must “warm-up” to be ready to run
ENERGY STAR Program
EPA and Industry work together to set criteria (since 1993)
Internationally recognized and accepted
Common procurement requirement (market incentive)
Typical Office Copier
1990 2000
80%
5034 Document Centre 432DC • Consumes up to 80 % less energy than comparable
1990 model
• While providing increased functionality
ENERGY STAROffice Equipment Results
Worldwide:Xerox ENERGY STAR equipment - 2000
•Avoided 600,000 tons Carbon Dioxideemissions
•Energy saved could light 650,000 U.S. houses for a year
Xerox ENERGY STAR MachinesAnnual Energy Savings (MwH)
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Climate change debate & energy “crisis” Increasing pressure for energy efficient products
• Growing international pressure for stricter ENERGY STAR criteria
– 66% stricter criteria in 2003 compared to 1999 levels
– No more “grandfathering”
Energy Star TrendPrinters
0
20
40
60
80
1999 2000 2003
Wat
ts in
Sle
ep M
ode
0-1010*2020-3030-44>44
Beyond Today’s Energy Star• U.S. and European public sector will demand “most” energy efficient
Technology Challenges:
•Energy management of complex systems (digital, networked, multifunction)
•Fast recovery times from energy-saving modes•Fuser technologies important - rapid heating
The Xerographic Process
Photoreceptor
Energy ManagementProcurement Challenges
2001 E.O. 13221
Buy Lowest “Standby” Power
Issues with Lowest “Standby” Power• Not necessary for products already managed under ENERGY STAR program
• Adds another energy criterion for procurement --- potentially confusing
• Could eliminate from consideration products that meet ENERGY STAR criteria
Federal Government
Automatic energy saving modes Manual OFF Switch
1999 E.O. 13123
Buy ENERGY STAR Equipment
• Energy efficiency
• Low machine emissions
• Paper-saving features
• Return programs for supplies
• Equipment takeback
• Energy efficiency
• Low machine emissions
• Paper-saving features
• Return programs for supplies
• Equipment takeback
Waste-free products manufactured in waste-free factories to enable customers’ waste-free workplaces
Waste Free Goal
• Minimal use of hazardous substances
• Low plant emissions • Efficient use of energy
and materials• Parts reuse• Equipment
remanufacture
• Minimal use of hazardous substances
• Low plant emissions • Efficient use of energy
and materials• Parts reuse• Equipment
remanufacture
• Equipment and parts recovery
• Materials recycling
• Equipment and parts recovery
• Materials recycling
SupplierRelationships
SupplierRelationships
Life CycleView
End of Life ManagementEnd of Life
Management
Design and Build
Design and Build
Customer Use
Customer Use
Waste Free GoalParts Reuse and Equipment Remanufacturing
Document Centre 220
“newly manufactured”
Document Centre 440
Conversion
“Factory Produced New Model”
Document Centre 220
“remanufactured”
raw materials
Waste to landfill
GOAL = 0%
equipment remanu-factured
parts made with recycled materials
parts strip,
repair, & reuse
equipment conversion
finished new
products
partsfabrication
Reuse/Recycle Process
suppliers Xerox
recyclingcenter
Goal: optimize financial and environmental benefits...
• Design tools
Designing for RemanufactureIncorporating reuse/recycle into product design
Life cycle costs
Extended life of parts
Easy disassembly
Part reusability
Material recyclability
Key Considerations Implementation
• Design requirements
Reman &DisposalCoding
Reman &DisposalCoding
MaterialGuides
MaterialGuides Product
Life CycleCost Model
Product Life Cycle
Cost Model
• Mandatory review in product development process
• Training
Designing for Product ConversionExtending the concept of remanufacture
Variant 3
Variant 1
Variant 2
Common engine
40 - 60%recycled content60+% recycledSp
eed
or
Func
tion
Time
• Platform design• Parts commonality• Good predictability
of field returns
Product Conversion
• Limitation: product life in the market place
CleanSheet X
RemanX
70 - 90%Reused parts: 0%
Product Remanufacture
Integrating “Remanufacture” with New Build
Teardown/strip
Staging
Sort
Clean
Reprocess
End-of-life machines
Machine frames
PartsAssemble
frameBuild
subassemblies
New parts
Machine assembly
Quality testing
New parts
New or “reman” machines
Document Centre 220
Document Centre 440
Advances in Cleaning TechnologyKey Enabler of Remanufacture/Reuse
199319881970 1998
Traditional solvent-based
cleaning
Traditional solvent-based
cleaningCO2
blastingCO2
blastingAutomated
CO2 blastingAutomated
CO2 blastingNon-
hazardousterpines
Non-hazardousterpines
Eliminate hazardous waste
Reduce cleaning time
Increase part recovery rates
…reduced cost and environmental impact
Evolution of Xerox Part Cleaning Technology
Results
Determine signature for new parts -- an acceptable range for noise, heat, vibration during use
Returned parts with consistent signatures are processed for reuse
Technology - Predicting Part ReliabilityKey Enabler of Remanufacture/Reuse
Xerox Signature Analysis
The Same High Standard for All ProductsEquivalent specifications for reliability, quality and appearanceSame quality assurance processSame guarantees and service agreementsSame performance
Key EnablersFull integration of remanufacture and manufactureTechnologies for predicting part reliabilityBusiness teams assume full responsibility throughout product development process
Ensuring Customer Satisfaction
Supplies: 16M lbs.
Equipment: 142M lbs.
Total:
158,000,000 lbs.
Xerox “Remanufacture” ResultsProgress Towards Waste-Free
More than 1 billion pounds of waste diverted from landfills since 1990Nearly 160 million pounds in 2000
Cost savings of several hundred million dollars annually
ChallengesProduct Delivery and Market Issues
Markets for remanufactured productsMarket acceptance developing slowlyGovernment purchasing is key
New technology increases obsolescence rateCost-effective “recycling” of equipment and materialsInfrastructure development
Need to develop cost-effective regional recyclers (i.e., disassemblers) for products
Partnerships requiredSome industry wideAlliances with suppliers
Recycled/remanufactured content...
Is integral to most Public Sector environmental procurement policies
BUT is often restricted by specifications in U.S. (state/local), Europe and Brazil
A
B
C
D
E
ChallengesProcurement Restrictions
25 States restrict products with used parts
2 states require 100% “virgin new”
EH&S Corporate Policy (updated in 1991)
For All Stakeholders
Protection from unacceptable risk takes priority over economic
considerations
For All Stakeholders
Protection from unacceptable risk takes priority over economic
considerations
For all Operations
Safeguard health, protect the environment &
conserve resources
For all Operations
Safeguard health, protect the environment &
conserve resources
For all Products
Optimize resource utilization & minimize environmental impact
For all Products
Optimize resource utilization & minimize environmental impact
Xerox ApproachGuiding Principles
Commitment to the protection of the environment and the health and safety of its employees, customers and neighbors
Commitment to the protection of the environment and the health and safety of its employees, customers and neighbors
EH&S Corporate Policy (updated in 1991)
Xerox ApproachDeployment
Strategic Goals and Initiatives
Safe Workplace
Eco-Efficiency
Safe Products
Customer Environmental
Satisfaction
HealthyWorkforce
EH&S Standards(applied worldwide)
MaterialsProducts
Remediation
Envirom’tlManage-mentOperations
Integrate EH&S into Product Development Process
DefineProductPlatform & Technology
Deliver Product
Market & Product Strategy
Toward Sustainability
Waste Free Goal
Evolution of Xerox Environmental Leadership Program
Eco-Efficiency
Remediation1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Business Value
Material Safety
2010
Paper BasedPaper Based
“Old” Industrial Economy“Old” Industrial Economy “New” Knowledge-based Economy“New” Knowledge-based Economy
Toward SustainabilityNew Ways of Doing Business
•Decentralized
•On demand
•Customized
•Reusable
•Decentralized
•On demand
•Customized
•Reusable
Reduced• Paper use • Waste•Energy Use • Inventory
Reduced• Paper use • Waste•Energy Use • Inventory
Xerox’s Core Business…Helping Customers Manage and Deliver Information Effectively
Electronic paperElectronic paper
Digital InformationDigital Information
BookBook--inin--TimeTimeFlowportFlowport
DocuShareDocuShare
• Energy intensive
• Polluting
• Natural resource depletion
• Energy intensive
• Polluting
• Natural resource depletion