e.sun academic award presentation (jan 2016)

22
Galit Shmueli 徐徐徐 Tsing Hua Distinguished Professor Analytics Humanity Innovation E. Sun Bank Academic Award

Upload: galit-shmueli

Post on 14-Feb-2017

414 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Galit Shmueli 徐茉莉Tsing Hua Distinguished Professor

AnalyticsHumanityInnovation

E. Sun Bank Academic Award

Page 2: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

The End of Competitive Advantage Rita McGrath (Columbia U)

Taipei 15/12/2015

“Banking must re-invent itself” 玉山金控總經理/黃男州

Page 3: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

“Statistics must re-invent itself"

Page 4: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Research in Data Analytics‘Entrepreneurial’

statistical & data mining modeling (for today’s problems)

Interdisciplinary modeling

Statistical StrategyTo Explain or To Predict?Information QualityRegression with Big Data

Page 5: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

ONE-WAY MIRRORS IN ONLINE DATING A Randomized Field Experiment

Management Science, forthcoming

A TREE-BASED APPROACH FOR ADDRESSING SELF-SELECTION IN IMPACT STUDIES WITH BIG DATA

MIS Quarterly, forthcoming

Page 6: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

A Tree-Based Approach for Addressing Self-selection in Impact Studies with Big Data

Inbal Yahav Galit Shmueli Deepa ManiBar Ilan University National Tsing Hua U Indian School of Business Israel Taiwan India

Page 7: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Self Selection: The Challenge• Large impact studies

of an intervention• Individuals/firms

choose which group to join

How to identify and adjust for self-selection?

Page 8: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Current Methods: Challenges with Big Data1. Matching leads to severe data loss

2. Suffer from “data dredging”

3. Do not identify variables that drive the selection

4. Assume constant intervention effect

5. Sequential nature is computationally costly

6. Requires user to specify form of selection model

Page 9: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Our Tree-Based Approach: Use a data mining algorithm in a novel way!

Flexible non-parametric selection model

Automated detection of unbalanced variables

Easy to interpret, transparent, visual

Applicable to binary, polytomous, continuous intervention

Useful in Big Data context

Identify heterogeneous effects

Page 10: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Example: Impact of training on financial gains

Experiment: USA govt program randomly assigned eligible candidates to training program• Goal: increase future earnings• Results (LaLonde, 1986) :

Groups statistically equal in terms of demographic & pre-train earnings

Average Training Effect = $1794 (p<0.004)

Page 11: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Tree reveals… High-School Matters!

LaLonde’s naïve approach (experiment)

Tree approachHS dropout

(n=348)HS degree

(n=97)Not trained (n=260) $4554 $4,495 $4,855Trained (n=185) $6349 $5,649 $8,047

Training effect

$1794(p=0.004)

$1,154(p=0.063)

$3,192(p=0.015)

Overall: $1598 (p=0.017)

no yes

High school degree

Page 12: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

ONE WAY MIRRORS IN ONLINE DATINGA Randomized Field Experiment

Ravi Bapna, University of MinnesotaJui Ramaprasad, Mcgill UniversityGalit Shmueli, National Tsing Hua

UniversityAkhmed Umyarov, University of

Minnesota

Page 13: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Online Dating

46

of the single population in the US uses online dating to find a partner (Gelles 2011)

%

Page 14: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

14/20Online Dating Website

Page 15: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

15/20Non-anonymous Browsing (Default)

Profile Visit

Recent visitor:

Page 16: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

16/20Anonymous Browsing

Profile Visit

Recent visitor:

NONE

Page 17: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

17/20Research Question (in simple words)

How does anonymous browsing affect user behavior?

… and matching?

Page 18: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Formal Research Question

what is the relative causal effect of social inhibitions on search preferences vs. social inhibitions of contact initiation in dating markets?

given known gender asymmetries, how does this effect differ for men vs. women?

Page 19: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

19/20

Randomized Field Experiment on Large Online Dating Website

50,000 users receive gift of anonymous browsing

Page 20: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

20/20Results

Users treated with anonymity

become disinhibited view more profiles, view more same-sex and interracial mates

get less matcheslose ability to leave a weak signal - especially harmful for women!

Page 21: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)

Role of anonymity and importance of WEAK SIGNAL

in online platforms

Page 22: E.SUN Academic Award presentation (Jan 2016)