evaluation of earthquake resistance of non-ductile reinforced concrete building located in...
DESCRIPTION
This study emphasized to investigate the earthquake force resistance of non-ductile reinforced concrete building which constructed in Thailand. The 3-story RC building was adopted to evaluate the earthquake resistance capacity when it subjected to earthquake force. A 3-story RC building is assumed to locate in three intensity levels of Thailand’s hazard area, surveillance zone, first zone and second zone. The RC frame was modeled as a two-dimensional. The moment-rotation relationship consists of yielding moment, capping moment and capping rotation obtained in plastic hinge model are determined from Ibarra and Krawinkler (2005). The capacity curve indicated that the 3-story RC building remains elastic behavior when the earthquake force regarded as base shear subjected to the building not more than 16000 kilogram forces and it can resist the maximum base shear in inelastic range around 19000 kilogram forces before collapse. When the building subjected to the earthquake forces from three intensity levels of Thailand’s hazard area, although the global behavior the building remain elastic but also the damage due to concrete crushing and/or rebar yielding are occurred in local behavior of beam and column.TRANSCRIPT
-
2556
-
EVALUATION OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE OF NON-DUCTILE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
LOCATED IN THAILANDS HAZARD AREA
TEWA BUETTNER
BUNSIRI PERMSUWAN
This thesis is part of the Bachelor of Engineering course. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
Burapha University 2013
-
II
3 3 1 2 3 (pushover analysis) 3 3 (.. 2550) 3 1 15224.48 4.74 2 14315.26 4.34 7837.67 2.35 3 19688.38 18.73 3 3 3 : , , ,
,
-
III
Abstract
This study emphasized to investigate the earthquake force resistance of non-ductile reinforced concrete building which constructed in Thailand. The 3-story RC building was adopted to evaluate the earthquake resistance capacity when it subjected to earthquake force. A 3-story RC building is assumed to locate in three intensity levels of Thailands hazard area, surveillance zone, first zone and second zone. The RC frame was modeled as a two-dimensional. The moment-rotation relationship consists of yielding moment, capping moment and capping rotation obtained in plastic hinge model are determined from Ibarra and Krawinkler (2005). The capacity curve indicated that the 3-story RC building remains elastic behavior when the earthquake force regarded as base shear subjected to the building not more than 16000 kilogram forces and it can resist the maximum base shear in inelastic range around 19000 kilogram forces before collapse. When the building subjected to the earthquake forces from three intensity levels of Thailands hazard area, although the global behavior the building remain elastic but also the damage due to concrete crushing and/or rebar yielding are occurred in local behavior of beam and column. Keywords : Nonlinear static procedure, pushover analysis, plastic hinge, Thailands hazard
area
-
IV
. . .
-
V
..................................................................................................................... ............... II Abstract..................................................................................................................................... III ..................................................................................................................... IV ....................................................................................................................................... V .................................................................................................................................. VII ............................................................................................................................. X 1 1.1 .................................................................................. 1 1.2 ..................................................................................... 2 1.3 .................................................................................................. 2 1.4 .................................................................................... 2 2 2.1 ................................................. 3 2.2 Plastic hinge............................................................................... 4 2.3 Sway mechanism 9 2.4 Capacity design................................................ 10 2.5 Flexural Over-strength.......................................................................................... 14 2.6 ......................... 15 2.7 ..... 22 2.8 ............. 29 2.9 ................................................................................................. 37
-
VI
()
3 3.1 ....................................................................................... 39 3.2 ............................................................................................ 47 3.3 ............................................................................ 55 4 4.1 .................................. 61 4.2 ..... 65 4.3 1............ 68 4.4 2............ 71 5 5.1 ................................................................................................... 74 5.2 ....................................................................................................... 75 ......................................................................................................................... 76 ......................................................................................................................... 77 . Moment Chord rotation.................... 79 . ............... 89 ...................................................................................................... 94
-
VII
2.1 1 ............ 4 2.2 ......................................................................................... 5 2.3 . 6 2.4 .............................. 7 2.5 plastic hinge........ 8 2.6 .......... 11 2.7 ........ 11 2.8 Beam sidesway mechanism Column sidesway mechanism 12 2.9 ............................................................ 12 2.10 ... .................. 16 2.11 - ......................................... 17 2.12 Bauschinger ......................................................... 17 2.13 R-5 ( l/d = 2.75)............................. 18 2.15 19 2.16 ................................................................................. 20 2.17 .................................................................. 21 2.18 -...................... 21 2.19 .......................................... 22 2.20 .................................................. 27 3.1 3 ................................................................................................... 40 3.2 1................................................................................................ 41 3.3 ............................................................................................ 42 3.4 2................................................................................................ 43 3.5 3................................................................................................ 44 3.6 ........................................................................................ 45 3.7 ............................................................................ 46
-
VIII
()
3.8 ............................................................................. 46 3.9 ....................................................................... 47 3.10 SD30............................................. 48 3.11 SR24............................................. 49 3.12 GB3.................................................................................. 50 3.13 B2..................................................................................... 50 3.14 B4..................................................................................... 51 3.15 - 2......................................................... 51 3.16 2 - 3............................................................. 52 3.17 3-...................................................... 53 3.18 .............................................................. 53 3.19 ................................................................... 54 3.20 ............................................... 54 3.21 Dead load................................................... 55 3.22 Live load.................................................... 56 3.23 Super Impose Dead load............................ 56 3.24 ....... 59 3.25 1............... 60 3.26 2............... 60 4.1 .............................................................................. 62 4.2 ............................................................ 64 4.4 ....................................... 65 4.5 ........................................ 66 4.6 ....................... 67 4.7 1............................................... 68 4.8 1................................................ 69 4.9 1............................... 70
-
IX
()
4.10 2................................................ 71 4.11 2................................................. 72 4.12 2................................ 73
-
X
2.1 ..................................... 14 3.1 ............................... 57 3.2 (Base Shear)...................................................................................... 57 3.3 58 3.4 58 1 3.5 59 2
-
1
1.1 17 2538
() 2537 5.1 25 50 12 2538 7 - 250
(.. 2550) Pushover Analysis
-
2
1.2 -
-
1.3 - 3 2
-
- 1 2 (..2550)
- Frame 2 - Pushover Analysis SAP2000 V.15.0.0
1.4 - 3
- 3
- 3
-
2
2.1
(Ground motion) (Damping) (Elastic Response Spectrum) 2.1 1 (Elastic)
-
4
2.1 1
(Elastic) (Inelastic) ( )
2.2 Plastic hinge
-
5
(Ductility ratio) 2.2
my
(2.1)
m ()
y
2.2
(Flexural mode) plastic hinge 2.3
-
6
2.3 2 2.2.1 A
Fe (Kinetic Energy) (absorb) (Potential energy) 2.4
2.2.2 B
= Fi Fe (absorb)
-
7
(dissipate) (Plastic hinge) 2.5 plastic hinge
2.4 ( : , : )
2.2 plastic
hinge (Curvature ductility) 2.5
m
y
(2.2)
()
1
3 / 1 0.5 /1
p pl l l l
(2.3)
plastic hinge l
plastic hinge
-
8
0.08 0.15p b yl d fl ( MPa , 1 ) (2.4)
2.5 plastic hinge plastic hinge (Ductile flexural yielding) crushing (shear failure) (bond pull-out failure) crushing plastic hinge (Cyclic loops) 2.5 1 2.5 - (Elasto-plastic)
-
9
2.3 Sway mechanism
2.6 2.7 plastic hinge
plastic hinge 3 plastic hinge 2 2.8 plastic hinge Beam sidesway mechanism Beam hinge mechanism plastic hinge Column sidesway mechanism Column hinge mechanism
Beam sidesway mechanism plastic hinge Column sidesway mechanism plastic hinge plastic hinge column sidesway mechanism (curvature ductility) beam sway mechanism beam sway mechanism beam sidesway mechanism
Column sidesway mechanism soft-story mechanism beam sidesway mechanism plastic hinge capacity design approach
-
10
2.4 Capacity design plastic hinge
plastic hinge - (Weak beam-strong column)
2.4.1 1 (Design flexural capacity
strength reduction factor ) ( 2.6 2.7)
2.4.2 2
plastic hinge plastic hinge ACI 2.9 Capacity design method Prof. Paulay, Pristley and Park Canturbury
1 2
2
n n ue
M M W L
LV
(2.5)
1nM 2nM uW L
-
11
2.6 2.7
-
12
2.8 Beam sidesway mechanism Column sidesway mechanism
2.9
2.4.3 3
plastic hinge ACI (Special moment resisting frame)
-
13
6
5c gM M
(2.6)
cM
gM
c gM M (2.7)
2.4.4 4
(Confinement) (Buckling) ACI
2.4.5 5 plastic hinge
plastic hinge -
-
14
2.5 Flexural Over-strength plastic hinge
flexural over-strength flexural over-strength ( ) nominal strength ( )
0 0 nM M (2.8) over-strength factor
plastic hinge
2.5.1 SR24, SD30, SD40 1 2.1
Steel grade
(ksc) (ksc) AIT
% SR24 2,400 3,600 50 SD30 3,000 3,870 29 SD40 4,000 4,800 20
2.5.2 (T-beam action)
2.5.3 strain hardening 2.5.4 (confinement)
-
15
2.6 2.6.1
(a/d) a/d (flexure-dominated beams) a/d (Shear-dominated beams)
- (Flexure-dominated beams) 2.10 ... a/d = 4.5
(stiffness) 5 stiffness reload Bauschinger effect 2.11 2.12 buckling
- (Shear-dominated beams) 2.13 2.14 ...
a/d =2.75 ( R-5) a/d = 4.41 ( R-6) R-5 R-6 R-5 R-6 stiffness reload R-6 R-5 stiffness reload
-
16
2.15 () 15d Sliding shear failure a/d
2.10 ...
-
17
2.11 -
2.12 Bauschinger
-
18
2.13 R-5 ( l/d = 2.75)
2.14 R-6 ( l/d = 4.46)
-
19
2.15 2.6.2
crush P- effect
-
20
2.16
2.6.3
() unbalanced moment unbalancedmoment unbalanced moment 16
1 2 j y ys sV A f A f H (2.9)
joint shear failure joint shear failure 90 2.17 (Bond failure) (slip)
-
21
bond pull-outfailure joint shear failure bond pull-out failure 2.18 joint shear failure bond pull-out failure capacity design -
2.17
2.18 -
-
22
2.7 (nM )
yM , y , /c yM M , ,cap pl , pc , , c c capping
/c yM M pc sK cK ,/ /s e y cap pl c y yK K M M M ( / ) /c e y pc c yK K M M yM cM capping hysteretic strength hysteretic stiffness
2.19
- nyM M
u s udk
-
23
(equivalent rectangular stress distribution) Whitney 0.85 'cf 1c
1 uk d 1 0.85 280'c kscf (2.10)
1' 280
0.85 0.0570
cf
280 560'cksc kscf (2.11)
1 0.65 560'c kscf (2.12) sf s sE yf sE
=
0.85 'c s sabf A f (2.13)
0.85 '
s s
c
A f
f ba (2.14)
( nM )
T C ( udj ) 2
ad
T
-
24
2
n u s s
aT j d A f dM
(2.15)
C
2
0.85 'n u ca
C j d ab dM f
(2.16)
( Modulus of Rupture : 2.0 'r cff kg/cm
2) (section uncracked) (strain distribution) a 2.14 2.15 2.16 nM
1 0.59'
sn s s
c
fM A f d
f
2 1 0.59
'
cs
c
ff
fbd
(2.17)
sAbd
bd (yielding failure) s y sf
yf ( 5600 kg/cm2 ACI ...) 2.14 2.15 s yf f
0.85 ' 0.85 '
ys s
c c
fA fd
f b fa
cm (2.18)
-
25
2
n u s y
aT j d A f dM
kg-cm (2.19)
1 0.59'
y
n s y
c
fA f d
fM
kg-cm (2.20)
2 1 0.59'
y
n y
c
ff
fM bd
kg-cm (2.21)
n s y uf j dM A 2n ubdM R kg-cm (2.22)
1 0.59'
y
u
c
f
fj
1 0.59'
y
u y
c
ff
fR
(crushing failure) u 0.003 mm/mm sf s y
= 0.85 'c s sab A ff = s sE bd (2.23)
1 1 uc k da
/s u d c c (2.21)
1/ 0.85 'u s cE fm 2 0
u um k mk
2
2 2u
m mmpk
(2.24)
-
26
uc k d s (2.23) (2.15) (balanced failure) u = 0.003 mm/mm s = y s yf f
b b
b ( balanced steel ratio )
bc 0.003u mm/mm s y
/
0.003
y s b
b
f E d c
c
0.003
0.003b
y
s
df
E
c
10.003
0.003b
y
s
df
E
a
10.85 ' 0.003
0.003 /
cb
y y s
f
f f E
(2.25)
62.04 10sE kg/kg
10.85 ' 6,120
6,120
cb
y y
f
f f
(2.26)
2
bn s y
aA f dM
2 1 0.59
'
y
n b y b
c
fM bd f
f
kg-cm (2.27)
-
27
-
Interaction Diagram
eh ,
0.85 '
y
c
fm
f , tm 2.20 nP
n nM Pe (2.28)
2.20
-
28
pc
1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40 ) 0.10vpc sh (2.29) v ( / ' )g cP A f
sh
cM
0.01 '/ (1.25)(0.89) (0.91) units c
c fv
c yM M (2.30) ,( / ' )sh y w cf f v ( / ' )g cP A f 'cf MPa
unitc 1 'cf yf MPa 6.9 ksi y yield ,
, , ,y y f y b y s (2.31) ,y f yield ,y b yield ,y s yield ,cap pl ,cap pl plastic rotation capacity
0.01 ' 0.10.43 10.0
, 0.12(1 0.55 )(0.16) (0.02 40 ) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)units c nc f Sv
cap pl sl sha (2.32)
-
29
sla = 1
sla = 0
v ( / ' )g cP A f
nS 'cf
sh ,cap pl
unitc 1 'cf yf MPa 6.9 ksi
2.8 .. 2550 5 (3) .. 2522 8 (3) .. 2522 ( 3) .. 2543 29 32 33 41 42 43 1 49 (.. 2540) .. 2522 2 1
-
30
2 3 (1) 1 () () () () () () () () () (2) 2 () () () ()
-
31
() () () () () 4 3 (Limited Ductility) 6 (.. 2527) .. 2522 5 6 6
-
32
(1)
V = ZIKCSW
V Z 7 I 8 K C 11 S 12 W 25 (2) ()
Ft = 0.07 TV
Ft 0.25 V T 0.7 Ft 0 ()
1
( )t x xx n
i i
i
V F w hF
wh
tF xF x
-
33
T 10
V ,x iw w x i ,x ih h x i
i = 1 x = 1
1
n
i i
i
wh
1 n
n 7 (Z) 1 0.19 2 0.38 8 (I)
I
(1) 3 (2) (3)
1.50 1.25 1.00
-
34
9 (K) K
(1) (Shear Wall) (Braced Frame) (2) (Ductile Moment-Resisting Frame) (3) () 25 () () (Rigidity) (4) K C 0.12 0.25 () (1) (2) (3) (4)
1.33
0.67
0.80
2.5
1.0
10 (T) (1)
0.09 nhTD
-
35
(2)
T = 0.10 N
nh
D N 11 (C)
1C =
15 T
0.12 0.12 12 (S)
S (1) (2) (3) (4)
1.0 1.2 1.5 2.5
(Shale) 60 60
-
36
9 (Undrained Shear Strength) 24 (2,400 ) 9 C S 0.14 0.14 0.26 0.26 13 (Story Drift) 6 (1) (2) 0.5 14 : 49 (.. 2540) .. 2522
-
37
2.9 Krawinkler Seneviratna (1998) 2, 5, 10, 20, 30 40 2 8 4 ( Northridge) 9 FEMA 273 5 5 5 Williams Albermani (2003) 3, 6, 10 (Nonlinear Static Procedure, NSP) FEMA 356 MPA NL RHA FEMA 356 MPA MPA FEMA 356 NL RHA Chintanapakdee Chopra (2003) 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 18 1, 1.5, 2, 4 6 20 MPA NL RHA
-
38
MPA NL RHA 2 3 NL RHA MPA 30 (Response Spectrum Analysis , RSA) (Elastic) (Underrestimate) ()
-
3
3
SAP2000 1 2 ..2550
3.1 3.1.1
- 3 12.85 m - 200 kg./m.2
- ACI 318-89
- 10 cm - 3 GB3, B2 B4 0.20.4m 3.6
- 3 - 2 0.30.3m 2- 3 0.250.25m 3 - 0.20.2m 3.7
-
40
3.1 3
-
41
3.2 1
-
42
3.3
-
43
3.4 2
-
44
3.5 3
-
45
3.6
-
46
3.7
3.8
-
47
3.1.2 - 210 kg/cm2
- 2 SR24 SD30 2,400 kg/cm2 3,000 kg/cm2
3.2 3.2.1
3.9
-
48
3.10 SD30
-
49
3.11 SR24
-
50
\ 3.2.2 ( Section Properties) - (Frame Properties)
3.12 GB3
3.13 B2
-
51
3.14 B4
3.15 - 2
-
52
3.16 2 - 3
-
53
3.17 3-
3.18
-
54
3.2.3 (hinge Properties)
3.19
3.20
-
55
3.3 3.3.1 200 kg/m2 3.21 , 3.22 3.23
3.21 Dead load
-
56
3.22 Live load
3.23 Super Impose Dead load
-
57
3.3.2 ..2550
- 3.1 ( W )
(kg)
3,168 2,304 11,520 0 116 17,108
3 6,600 2,304 11,520 4,800 240 25,464 2 6,600 2,304 11,520 4,800 375 25,599
5,808 2,304 11,520 4,800 476 24,908 1 5,808 2,304 11,520 4,800 476 24,908
117,987 (Base Shear)
V ZIKCSW 3.2 (Base Shear)
zone Z I K C S W(kg) V(kg) 0.19 1 1 0.12 1.2 117987 3138
1 0.19 1 1 0.12 2.5 117987 5829 2 0.38 1 1 0.12 1 117987 5380
-
58
-
1
( )t x xx n
i i
i
V F w hF
wh
3.3 ( xF )
( )xh m ( )xw kg x xh w ( )tF kg ( )V kg ( )xF kg
11.65 17,108 199,308 0 3,266 971 3 8.65 25,464 220,264 0 3,266 1,074 2 5.65 25,599 144,634 0 3,266 705
2.95 24,908 73,479 0 3,266 358 1 0.25 24,908 6,227 0 3,266 30
3.4 ( xF ) 1
( )xh m ( )xw kg x xh w ( )tF kg ( )V kg ( )xF kg 11.65 17,108 199,308 0 6,066 1,804
3 8.65 25,464 220,264 0 6,066 1,994 2 5.65 25,599 144,634 0 6,066 1,309
2.95 24,908 73,479 0 6,066 665 1 0.25 24,908 6,227 0 6,066 56
-
59
3.5 ( xF ) 2
3.24
( )xh m ( )xw kg x xh w ( )tF kg ( )V kg ( )xF kg 11.65 17,108 199,308 0 5,599 1,655
3 8.65 25,464 220,264 0 5,599 1,840 2 5.65 25,599 144,634 0 5,599 1,208
2.95 24,908 73,479 0 5,599 614 1 0.25 24,908 6,227 0 5,599 52
-
60
3.25 1
3.26 2
-
4
1 2 Pushover Analysis (Capacity Curve)
4.1 4.1.1 (Capacity curve) 4.1 19,688.38 kgf
18.73 cm 1 15,224.48 kgf 4.74 cm 2 14,315.26 kgf 4.34 cm 7,837.67 kgf 2.35 cm
-
62
4.1
4.1.2 ( Plastic hinges mechanism )
- Yield (Y) - Immediate Occupancy (IO)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Base
Reac
tion (
kgf)
Displacement (cm)
Pushover Curve
1
2
(2.35,7837.67)
(4.34,14315.26) (4.74,15224.48) ()
()
() ()
-
63
- Life Safety (LS) 75%
- Collapse Prevention (CP) 90%
- Failure (F)
4.1 4.2 4.48 cm () 14,766.41 kgf 1 Y IO 2 IO 3 Y Elastic
6.73 cm () 17,898.18 kgf 1 2 Y IO 3 IO Yield Elastic
18.73 cm () 19,688.38 kgf 1 3 Y IO LS F 2 IO LS Y 1 IO LS 2 IO Inelastic
23.92 cm () 19,428.76 kgf 1 Y IO F 2 LS F 3 IO Y 1 IO , LS F Y 2 IO Inelastic
-
64
() ()
() ()
Yield Immediate Occupancy Live Safety Collapse Prevention Failure
4.2
-
65
4.2 4.2.1 (Capacity curve) 1 2 3 30 kg 358 kg 705 kg 1,074 kg 971 kg 4.4 7,837.67 kgf 2.35 cm 4.5
4.4
-
66
4.5
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Base
Reac
tion (
kgf)
Displacement (cm)
Pushover Curve
(2.35,7837.67)
-
67
4.2.2 (Plastic hinges mechanism) 4.5 4.6 () 1 2 3 Y IO
() ()
() ()
Yield Immediate Occupancy Live Safety Collapse Prevention Failure
4.6
-
68
4.3 1 4.3.1 (Capacity Curve)
1 1 2 3 56 kg 665 kg 1,309 kg 1,994 kg 1,804 kg 4.7 15,224.48 kgf 4.74 cm 4.8
4.7 1
-
69
4.8 1
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Base
Reac
tion (
kgf)
Displacement (cm)
Pushover Curve
1 (4.74,15224.48)
-
70
4.2.2 (Plastic hinges mechanism) 4.8 4.9
() 1 2 3 Y IO
() ()
() ()
Yield Immediate Occupancy Live Safety Collapse Prevention Failure
4.9 1
-
71
4.4 2 4.4.1 (Capacity Curve)
2 1 2 3 52 kg 614 kg 1,208 kg 1,840 kg 1,665 kg 4.10 14,315.26 kgf 4.34 cm 4.11
4.10 2
-
72
4.11 2
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Base
Reac
tion (
kgf)
Displacement (cm)
Pushover Curve
2
(4.34,14315.26)
-
73
4.4.2 (Plastic hinges mechanism) 4.11 4.12
() 1 2 3 Y IO
() ()
() ()
Yield Immediate Occupancy Live Safety Collapse Prevention Failure
4.12 2
-
5
3 Pushover Analysis
5.1 5.1.1 (Earthquake intensity)
- 1 (Base Shear) 5,829 kgf
- 2 (Base Shear) 5,380 kgf
- (Base Shear) 3,138 kgf
1
5.1.2 (Performance of reinforced concrete frames)
- 19,688.38 kgf 18.73 cm
- 1 15,224.48 kgf 4.74 cm
- 2 14,315.26 kgf 4.34 cm
- 7,837.67 kgf 2.35 cm
1 2
-
75
5.1.3 ( Plastic hinges mechanism ) - 1 2 1 2 3 Yield (Y) Immediate Occupancy (IO)
5.2 - 1 2
-
- (S) (S)
- (..2550)
-
[1.] , .. 2550 [2.] , , .. 2546 [3.] , , 2541 [4.] , , 5 .. 2554 [5.] Curtis B Haselton and Gregory G. Deierlein, Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforce Concrete Moment Frame Buildings, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, 2007
-
77
1. 82/3 5 20260 E-mail [email protected] 2. 90 11 27260 E-mail [email protected]
-
.
Moment Chord rotation
-
80
Moment Chord rotation
GB3 ( Single reinforcement )
b = 20 cm , h = 40 cm , d = 36.3 cm , 'd = 3.7 cm , 1 = 0.85
'cf = 210 kg/cm2 210 9.81 20.6
100
Mpa
yf = 3,000 kg/cm2 3,000 9.81 294.3
100
Mpa
22 0.64 0.0014
20 20
shsh
A
sb
23 1.23.39
4sA
cm2 ,
22 1.2' 2.26
4sA
cm2
0.85 'cC f ba 0.85 210 20 a
s yT A f 3.39 3000 10,170 kg
T C ; 101700.85 210 20
a
= 2.85 cm
2n
aM T d
2.8510170 36.32
354,679 kg-cm
3,547 3547 kg-m
0.9 3,547y nM M = 3,192 kg-m
3,192 9.81
1,000yM
31.32 kN-m
-
81
'g c
Pv
A f 0
20 40 210
= 0 ; 0P kg
0.01 '1.25 (0.89) (0.91) unit c
c fvc
y
M
M
0 0.01(1)(20.6)31.32 1.25 (0.89) (0.91)cM = 38.39 kN-m
cM = 38.39 1,000
9.81
= 3,914 kg-m
,cap pl
0.01 ' 0.010.43 10.0
, 0.12(1 0.55 )(0.16) (0.02 40 ) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)units c nc f sv
cap pl sl sha
0 0.43 0.01(1)(20.6) 0.01(21.44) 10.0(0.0078)0.12(1 0.55(1))(0.16) (0.02 40(0.0014) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)
0.0237 redians
pc
1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40 ) 0.10vpc sh
0 1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40(0.0014)) 0.10
0.0549 redians 0.10
,cap pl pc = 0.0237 + 0.0549 = 0.0786 redians
1 Moment Chord rotation GB3
Point Moment ( kg-m ) Chord rotation ( redians ) A 0 0 B 3,192 0 C 3,914 0.0237 D 0 0.0786 E 0 0.0786
-
82
B2 ( Double reinforcement )
b = 20 cm , h = 40 cm , d = 36.1 cm , 'd = 3.9 cm , 1 = 0.85
'cf = 210 kg/cm2 210 9.81 20.6
100
Mpa
yf = 3,000 kg/cm2 3,000 9.81 294.3
100
Mpa
22 0.64 0.0014
20 20
shsh
A
sb
22 1.64.02
4sA
cm2 ,
22 1.6' 4.02
4sA
cm2
1
6,120 '
1.7 '
s s y
c
A A fR
f b
6,120 4.02 4.02 3,000
1.7 210 20 0.85
= 2.07
1
6,120 ' '
0.85 '
s
c
d A
f b
6,120 3.9 4.02
0.85 210 20 0.85
= 31.62
2c R R 22.07 2.07 31.62 = 3.92 cm
1a c = 0.853.92 = 3.33 cm
'' 0.003s s
c df E
c
63.92 3.9 0.003 2.04 103.92
= 31.22 kg/cm2
0.85 ' ' '( ')2
n c s s
aM f ba d A f d d
3.330.85 210 20 3.33 36.1 4.02 31.22 36.1 3.92
413,408 kg-cm
4,134 kg-m
-
83
0.9 4,134y nM M = 3,721 kg-m
3,721 9.81
1,000yM
36.50 kN-m
'g c
Pv
A f 0
20 40 210
= 0 ; 0P kg
0.01 '1.25 (0.89) (0.91) unit c
c fvc
y
M
M
0 0.01(1)(20.6)36.50 1.25 (0.89) (0.91)cM = 44.75 kN-m
cM = 44.75 1,000
9.81
= 4,561 kg-m
,cap pl
0.01 ' 0.010.43 10.0
, 0.12(1 0.55 )(0.16) (0.02 40 ) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)units c nc f sv
cap pl sl sha
0 0.43 0.01(1)(20.6) 0.01(21.44) 10.0(0.0111)0.12(1 0.55(1))(0.16) (0.02 40(0.0014) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)
0.0243 redians
pc
1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40 ) 0.10vpc sh
0 1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40(0.0014)) 0.10
0.0549 redians 0.10
,cap pl pc = 0.0243 + 0.0549 = 0.0792 redians
-
84
2 Moment Chord rotation B2
Point Moment ( kg-m ) Chord rotation ( redians ) A 0 0 B 3,721 0 C 4,561 0.0243 D 0 0.0792 E 0 0.0792
C5A
b = 20 cm , h = 20 cm , d = 20 3.9 = 16.1 cm , 'd = 3.9 cm
'cf = 210 kg/cm2 210 9.81 20.6
100
Mpa
yf = 3,000 kg/cm2 3,000 9.81 294.3
100
Mpa
22 0.64 0.0014
20 20
shsh
A
sb
1
0.003
0.003b
y
s
da k
f
E
6
0.85 0.003 16.1
30000.003
2.04 10
= 9.18 cm
0.85 'b b cP a f b = 9.180.8521020 = 32,773 kg
0.85 ' '( ')2
'
bc b y s
b
b
af a b d f A d d
eP
29.180.85 210 9.18 20 16.1 3,000 2 1.6 (16.1 3.9)2 4
'32,773
be
-
85
'be = 16 cm
( ')'
2b b
d de e
16.1 3.916
2
= 9.9 cm
0.85 '
y
c
fm
f 3,000
0.85 210
= 16.8
9.9
20
e
h = 0.495
24 1.64
20 16.1
= 0.025
16.8 0.025m = 0.42
0.495eh , 0.336m 1
1
0.43
3
-
86
1 0.43'
n
c
P
bhf
nP = 0.432020210 = 36,120 kg
n nM Pe = 36,1200.099 = 3,576 kg-m
y nM M = 0.93,576 = 3,218 kg-m
3,218 9.81
1,000yM
= 31.57 kN-m
9,589
' 20 20 210g c
Pv
A f
= 0.11 ; 9,859P kg
0.01 '1.25 (0.89) (0.91) unit c
c fvc
y
M
M
0.11 0.01(1)(20.6)31.57 1.25 (0.85) (0.91)cM = 38.21 kN-m
cM = 38.21 1,000
9.81
= 3,895 kg-m
,cap pl
0.01 ' 0.010.43 10.0
, 0.12(1 0.55 )(0.16) (0.02 40 ) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)units c nc f sv
cap pl sl sha
0.11 0.43 0.01(1)(20.6) 0.01(21.44) 10.0(0.025)0.12(1 0.55(1))(0.16) (0.02 40(0.0014) (0.54) (0.66) (2.27)
0.0223 redians
pc
1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40 ) 0.10vpc sh
0.11 1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40(0.0014)) 0.10
0.0374 redians 0.10
-
87
,cap pl pc = 0.0223 + 0.0374 = 0.0597 redians
3 Moment Chord rotation C5A
Point Moment ( kg-m ) Chord rotation ( redians ) A 0 0 B 3,218 0 C 3,895 0.0223 D 0 0.0597 E 0 0.0597
4 yM , y , cM , ,cap pl , ,cap pl pl
Column yM
(kg-m) y
(radians) cM
(kg-m) ,cap pl
(radians) ,cap pl pl
(radians) GB3 3,192 0 3,914 0.0237 0.0786 B2 3,721 0 4,561 0.0243 0.0792 B4 6,773 0 8,304 0.0257 0.0806
-
88
5 yM , y , cM , ,cap pl , ,cap pl pl
Column yM
(kg-m) y
(radians) cM
(kg-m) ,cap pl
(radians) ,cap pl pl
(radians) C5-A 3,218 0 3,895 0.0223 0.0597 C5-B 3,218 0 3,828 0.0169 0.0391 C5-C 3,218 0 3,868 0.0200 0.0504 C5-D 3,218 0 3,904 0.0230 0.0629 C4-A 6,233 0 7,468 0.0174 0.0407 C4-B 6,233 0 7,361 0.0138 0.0289 C4-C 6,233 0 7,421 0.0157 0.0350 C4-D 6,233 0 7,421 0.0157 0.0350 C3-A 7,709 0 9,212 0.0267 0.0674 C3-B 7,709 0 9,084 0.0214 0.0482 C3-C 7,709 0 9,159 0.0243 0.0585 C3-D 7,709 0 9,255 0.0287 0.0755 C2-A 7,709 0 9,116 0.0226 0.0524 C2-B 7,709 0 8,979 0.0178 0.0368 C2-C1 7,709 0 9,148 0.0239 0.0569 C2-C2 7,709 0 9,137 0.0235 0.0554 C2-D 7,709 0 9,223 0.0272 0.0693 C1-A 7,709 0 9,010 0.0188 0.0398 C1-B 7,709 0 8,844 0.0140 0.0261 C1-C 7,709 0 9,021 0.0192 0.0410 C1-D 7,709 0 9,159 0.0243 0.0585
-
.
-
90
(Base Shear)
V ZIKCSW
- ( Z ) Z = 0.19 1 Z = 0.19 2 Z = 0.38
- ( I ) I = 1.00
- ( K ) K = 1.00
- ( C )
( T )
0.09 nhTD
0.09 11.650.30
12.00T s
1
C = 15 T
1C = 0.122
15 0.30
0.12 0.12 C = 0.12
-
91
- ( S ) S = 1.2 1 S = 2.5 2 S = 1.0
- (W)
6 ( W )
(kg)
3,168 2,304 11,520 0 116 17,108
3 6,600 2,304 11,520 4,800 240 25,464 2 6,600 2,304 11,520 4,800 375 25,599
5,808 2,304 11,520 4,800 476 24,908 1 5,808 2,304 11,520 4,800 476 24,908
117,987
V ZIKCSW 7 (Base Shear)
zone Z I K C S W(kg) V(kg) 0.19 1 1 0.12 1.2 117987 3138
1 0.19 1 1 0.12 2.5 117987 5829 2 0.38 1 1 0.12 1 117987 5380
-
92
0.07 tF TV tF 0.25V T 0.7 tF 0 tF = 0 ( T = 0.3 < 0.7 )
- ( xF )
1
( )t x xx n
i i
i
V F w hF
wh
8 ( xF )
( )xh m ( )xw kg x xh w ( )tF kg ( )V kg ( )xF kg
11.65 17,108 199,308 0 3,266 971 3 8.65 25,464 220,264 0 3,266 1,074 2 5.65 25,599 144,634 0 3,266 705
2.95 24,908 73,479 0 3,266 358 1 0.25 24,908 6,227 0 3,266 30
-
93
9 ( xF ) 1
10 ( xF ) 2
( )xh m ( )xw kg x xh w ( )tF kg ( )V kg ( )xF kg 11.65 17,108 199,308 0 6,066 1,804
3 8.65 25,464 220,264 0 6,066 1,994 2 5.65 25,599 144,634 0 6,066 1,309
2.95 24,908 73,479 0 6,066 665 1 0.25 24,908 6,227 0 6,066 56
( )xh m ( )xw kg x xh w ( )tF kg ( )V kg ( )xF kg 11.65 17,108 199,308 0 5,599 1,655
3 8.65 25,464 220,264 0 5,599 1,840 2 5.65 25,599 144,634 0 5,599 1,208
2.95 24,908 73,479 0 5,599 614 1 0.25 24,908 6,227 0 5,599 52
-
EVALUATION OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE OF NON-DUCTILE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING LOCATED IN THAILANDS HAZARD
AREA
.
3 3 1 2 3 (pushover analysis) 3 3 (.. 2550) 3 1 15224.48 4.74 2 14315.26 4.34 7837.67 2.35 3 19688.38 18.73 3 3
-
95
3
Abstract This study emphasized to investigate the earthquake force resistance of non-ductile
reinforced concrete building which constructed in Thailand. The 3-story RC building was adopted to evaluate the earthquake resistance capacity when it subjected to earthquake force. A 3-story RC building is assumed to locate in three intensity levels of Thailands hazard area, surveillance zone, first zone and second zone. The RC frame was modeled as a two-dimensional. The moment-rotation relationship consists of yielding moment, capping moment and capping rotation obtained in plastic hinge model are determined from Ibarra and Krawinkler (2005). The capacity curve indicated that the 3-story RC building remains elastic behavior when the earthquake force regarded as base shear subjected to the building not more than 16000 kilogram forces and it can resist the maximum base shear in inelastic range around 19000 kilogram forces before collapse. When the building subjected to the earthquake forces from three intensity levels of Thailands hazard area, although the global behavior the building remain elastic but also the damage due to concrete crushing and/or rebar yielding are occurred in local behavior of beam and column.
-
96
1.)
17 2538 () 2537 5.1 25 50 12 2538 7 - 250
( . . 2550) Pushover Analysis
2.)
3 SAP2000 1 2 ..2550
-
97
2.1 3 12.85 m 200 kg./m.2 ACI 318-89 10 cm
2.2
2.2.1 yM , y ,
/c yM M , ,cap pl , pc , , c pc
1.02(0.76)(0.031) (0.02 40 ) 0.10vpc sh
cM 0.01 '
/ (1.25)(0.89) (0.91) units cc fv
c yM M y
, , ,y y f y b y s ,cap pl
0.43
,
0.01 ' 0.1 10.0
0.12(1 0.55 )(0.16) (0.02 40 )
(0.54) (0.66) (2.27)units c n
v
cap pl sl sh
c f S
a
-
98
2.2.2 ..2550
- (Base Shear)
V ZIKCSW -
1
( )t x xx n
i i
i
V F w hF
wh
3.) 3.1
19,688.38 kgf 18.73 cm 1 15,224.48 kgf 4.74 cm 2 14,315.26 kgf 4.34 cm
7,837.67 kgf 2.35 cm
3.2 (Plastic hinges mechanism )
4.48 cm () 14,766.41 kgf 1 Y IO 2 IO 3 Y Elastic
6.73 cm ()
-
99
17,898.18 kgf 1 2 Y IO 3 IO Yield Elastic
18.73 cm () 19,688.38 kgf 1 3 Y IO LS F 2 IO LS Y 1 IO LS 2 IO Inelastic
23.92 cm () 19,428.76 kgf 1 Y IO F 2 LS F 3 IO Y 1 IO , LS F Y 2 IO Inelastic
()
()
()
-
100
()
3.3 () 1 2 3 Y IO
3.4 1
() 1 2 3 Y IO
1 3.5 2
() 1 2 3 Y IO
-
101
2
4) 4.1 (Earthquake intensity) 1 4.2 (Performance of
reinforced concrete frames) 1 2 4.3 ( Plastic hinges mechanism )
5) - 1 2
-
- (S) (S)
-
102
- (..2550)
[1.] , .. 2550 [2.] , , .. 2546 [3.] , , 2541 [4.] , , 5 .. 2554 [5.] Curtis B Haselton and Gregory G. Deierlein, Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforce Concrete Moment Frame Buildings, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, 2007
1).pdf2).pdf3).pdf4).pdf5).pdf6).pdf7) 1.pdf8) 2.pdf9) 3.pdf10) 4.pdf11) 5.pdf12).pdf13).pdf14)().pdf15)().pdf16)(1).pdf17)(2).pdf