experimental study of contact dermatitis due to alstroemeria in guinea pigs

1
Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 39, 82–100 Copyright C Munksgaard 1998 Printed in Denmark . All rights reserved ISSN 0105-1873 Short Communications Experimental study of contact dermatitis due to alstroemeria in guinea pigs K H 1 ,S O 1 ,C -N W 1 ,Y A 2 A U 1 1 Department of Hygiene, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 2-2-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan, 2 Ginkyo College of Medical Science, 1-6-2 Okubo, Kumamoto 860-0083, Japan Key words: guinea pig maximization test; alstroemeria; Alstroemeria; a-methylene-g-butyrolactone; a-MBL; contact allergens; allergic contact dermatitis.C Munksgaard, 1998. Contact allergy from handling alstroemeria (Alstroe- meria) has been widely observed in horticulturalists and florists (1–5). a-methylene-g-butyrolactone (a-MBL) has been shown to be the causative agent (6, 7). In the pres- ent study, delayed-type contact dermatitis due to alstroe- meria was evaluated using the guinea pig maximization test (GMT) (8), and the intensity of allergic reactions was investigated by quantifying the contents of a-MBL in different parts of alstroemeria by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (9). Irritation was found when 0.5 or 1.0 W/W% a-MBL in physiological saline (phys S) was applied to unsensi- tized female guinea pig skin. Original extracts pre- pared by the method of Christensen (9) from flowers and leaves of alstroemeria and 5-fold diluted solution also showed irritation on the animals’ skin. To detect delayed-type allergy due to alstroemeria, 1.0 W/W% a- MBL in physS was applied to guinea pigs for induc- tion and 0.1 W/W% a-MBL physS as challenge in the GMT. 5-fold diluted solutions of flower, leaf and stem extracts were also applied to the animals for induction and 10-fold diluted solutions of these extracts as chal- lenge in the GMT. Delayed-type allergy to alstroemer- ia was observed in both GMTs (Table 1). Maximiza- tion grading was performed 24 h after challenge in the test. Both a-MBL in physS and the diluted original Table 1. Allergenicity of water extracts of Alstroemeria Wilhelmina in the GMT Induction Challenge Challenge results material material 24 h 48 h 72 h a-MBL a-MBL 12/12 12/12 10/12 control a-MBL 0/12 0/12 0/12 flowers flowers 11/12 8/12 6/12 control flowers 0/12 0/12 0/12 leaves leaves 9/12 5/12 3/12 control leaves 0/12 0/12 0/12 stems stems 9/12 8/12 3/12 control stems 0/12 0/12 0/12 extracts from the flowers induced extreme reactions and the extracts of leaves and stems induced strong re- action. Flowers showed the highest concentration of a-MBL (1.230.13; mean1SD; mg/g-wet, nΩ5), while leaves contained the lowest concentration and stems the middle, in the extracts prepared freshly by water extrac- tion. In conclusion, not only irritation but also sensitiza- tion was observed in guinea pig skin exposed to extracts from alstroemeria. Determination of a-MBL is a useful method of estimating the allergic contact dermatitis risk from alstroemeria. References 1. Van Ketel W G, Verspyck Mijnnssen G A, Neering H. Con- tact eczema from alstroemeria. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1: 323–324. 2. Marks J G. Allergic contact dermatitis to alstroemeria. Arch Dermatol 1988: 124: 914–916. 3. Thiboutot D M, Hamory B H, Marks J G. Dermatoses among floral shop workers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990: 22: 54–58. 4. Wilkinson J D, Rycroft R J G. Contact dermatitis. In: Champion R H, Burton J L, Ebling F J G (eds): Textbook of dermatology , 5th edition. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1992: 611–715. 5. Bruynzeel D P. Bulb dermatitis. Dermatological problems in the flower bulb industries. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 70–77. 6. Slob A. Tulip allergens in alstroemeria and some other lili- florae. Phytochemistry 1973: 12: 811–815. 7. Slob A, Jekel B, Jong B D. On the occurrence of tuliposides in the liliflorae. Phytochemistry 1975: 14: 1997–2005. 8. Magnusson B, Klingman A M. The identification of con- tact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximiza- tion test. J Invest Dermatol 1969: 52: 268–276. 9. Christensen L P, Kristiansen K. A simple HPLC method for the isolation and quantification of the allergens tulipo- side A and tulipalin A in Alstroemeria. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 199–203.

Upload: koichi-harada

Post on 21-Jul-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Experimental study of contact dermatitis due to alstroemeria in guinea pigs

Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 39, 82–100 Copyright C Munksgaard 1998Printed in Denmark . All rights reserved

ISSN 0105-1873

Short CommunicationsExperimental study of contact dermatitis due to alstroemeria in guinea pigs

K H1, S O1, C-N W1, Y A2 A U1

1Department of Hygiene, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 2-2-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-0811, Japan,2Ginkyo College of Medical Science, 1-6-2 Okubo, Kumamoto 860-0083, Japan

Key words: guinea pig maximization test; alstroemeria; Alstroemeria; a-methylene-g-butyrolactone; a-MBL; contactallergens; allergic contact dermatitis.C Munksgaard, 1998.

Contact allergy from handling alstroemeria (Alstroe-meria) has been widely observed in horticulturalists andflorists (1–5). a-methylene-g-butyrolactone (a-MBL) hasbeen shown to be the causative agent (6, 7). In the pres-ent study, delayed-type contact dermatitis due to alstroe-meria was evaluated using the guinea pig maximizationtest (GMT) (8), and the intensity of allergic reactionswas investigated by quantifying the contents of a-MBLin different parts of alstroemeria by high-performanceliquid chromatography (HPLC) (9).

Irritation was found when 0.5 or 1.0 W/W% a-MBLin physiological saline (phys S) was applied to unsensi-tized female guinea pig skin. Original extracts pre-pared by the method of Christensen (9) from flowersand leaves of alstroemeria and 5-fold diluted solutionalso showed irritation on the animals’ skin. To detectdelayed-type allergy due to alstroemeria, 1.0 W/W% a-MBL in physS was applied to guinea pigs for induc-tion and 0.1 W/W% a-MBL physS as challenge in theGMT. 5-fold diluted solutions of flower, leaf and stemextracts were also applied to the animals for inductionand 10-fold diluted solutions of these extracts as chal-lenge in the GMT. Delayed-type allergy to alstroemer-ia was observed in both GMTs (Table 1). Maximiza-tion grading was performed 24 h after challenge in thetest. Both a-MBL in physS and the diluted original

Table 1. Allergenicity of water extracts of AlstroemeriaWilhelmina in the GMT

Induction Challenge Challenge resultsmaterial material 24 h 48 h 72 h

a-MBL a-MBL 12/12 12/12 10/12control a-MBL 0/12 0/12 0/12

flowers flowers 11/12 8/12 6/12control flowers 0/12 0/12 0/12

leaves leaves 9/12 5/12 3/12control leaves 0/12 0/12 0/12

stems stems 9/12 8/12 3/12control stems 0/12 0/12 0/12

extracts from the flowers induced extreme reactionsand the extracts of leaves and stems induced strong re-action.

Flowers showed the highest concentration of a-MBL(1.23∫0.13; mean∫1SD; mg/g-wet, nΩ5), while leavescontained the lowest concentration and stems themiddle, in the extracts prepared freshly by water extrac-tion.

In conclusion, not only irritation but also sensitiza-tion was observed in guinea pig skin exposed to extractsfrom alstroemeria. Determination of a-MBL is a usefulmethod of estimating the allergic contact dermatitis riskfrom alstroemeria.

References1. Van Ketel W G, Verspyck Mijnnssen G A, Neering H. Con-

tact eczema from alstroemeria. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1:323–324.

2. Marks J G. Allergic contact dermatitis to alstroemeria.Arch Dermatol 1988: 124: 914–916.

3. Thiboutot D M, Hamory B H, Marks J G. Dermatosesamong floral shop workers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990: 22:54–58.

4. Wilkinson J D, Rycroft R J G. Contact dermatitis. In:Champion R H, Burton J L, Ebling F J G (eds): Textbookof dermatology, 5th edition. London: Blackwell ScientificPublications. 1992: 611–715.

5. Bruynzeel D P. Bulb dermatitis. Dermatological problemsin the flower bulb industries. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37:70–77.

6. Slob A. Tulip allergens in alstroemeria and some other lili-florae. Phytochemistry 1973: 12: 811–815.

7. Slob A, Jekel B, Jong B D. On the occurrence of tuliposidesin the liliflorae. Phytochemistry 1975: 14: 1997–2005.

8. Magnusson B, Klingman A M. The identification of con-tact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximiza-tion test. J Invest Dermatol 1969: 52: 268–276.

9. Christensen L P, Kristiansen K. A simple HPLC methodfor the isolation and quantification of the allergens tulipo-side A and tulipalin A in Alstroemeria. Contact Dermatitis1995: 32: 199–203.