figure 3-1: east fork san jacinto river sampling map · 2012. 4. 26. · table 3-1: east fork san...
TRANSCRIPT
Figure 3-1: East Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Map
Table 3-1: East Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Results
Station Description Station Type
Station Mile
Sample Date
Sample Time
E. coli (cfu/100mL)
Flow Est. (cfs)
Flow* Severity
Temp (C)
Cond (μS/cm)
Total Cl2 (mg/L)
EFSJ02 Jenkins Rd main stem 64.1 1-Nov-07 16:40 230 < 0.1 2 17.6 275 n/a EFSJ01 FM 945 main stem 53.6 1-Nov-07 15:44 360 < 0.5 3 17.0 348 n/a 17431 SH 150 main stem 50.1 1-Nov-07 17:14 116 < 0.5 2 18.5 329 n/a 11237 FM 945 main stem 33.9 1-Nov-07 17:38 655 10 3 17.7 131 n/a
EFSJ04 SH 150 tributary 30.3 1-Nov-07 14:55 655 < 1 3 17.6 265 n/a EFSJ03 Shell Oil Rd tributary 30.3 1-Nov-07 14:20 991 12.9 3 17.6 94 n/a 11238 SH 105 main stem 25.2 1-Nov-07 17:20 727 27 3 19.0 129 n/a
EFSJ05 Cleveland WWTP 25.1 2-Nov-07 12:32 2 0.74 n/a 25.8 695 n/a 14242 US 59 main stem 21.5 1-Nov-07 16:55 460 30 3 19.2 144 n/a 11236 FM 2090 main stem 13.3 1-Nov-07 16:20 16 37 3 18.4 148 n/a 11235 FM 1485 main stem 6.5 1-Nov-07 15:40 1227 40 3 19.1 147 n/a
1123
5, F
M 1
485
1123
6, F
M 2
090
1424
2, U
S 59
EFSJ
05, C
leve
land
11
238,
SH
105
EFS
J03,
She
ll O
il R
dE
FSJ0
4, S
H 1
50
1123
7, F
M 9
45
1743
1, S
H 1
50EFS
J01,
FM
945
EFSJ
02, J
enki
ns R
d
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.0
River Station (mile)
E co
li (c
fu/1
00m
L)
Main StemTributaryWWTP
(Lk Houston)
Figure 3-2: East Fork San Jacinto River Bacteria Results Profile
EFSJ
02, J
enki
ns R
d
EFSJ
01, F
M 9
45
1743
1, S
H 1
50
1123
7, F
M 9
45
EFSJ
04, S
H 1
50
EFSJ
03, S
hell
Oil
Rd
1123
8, S
H 1
05EF
SJ05
, Cle
vela
nd
1424
2, U
S 59
1123
6, F
M 2
090
1123
5, F
M 1
485
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTP ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(Lk Houston)
Figure 3-3: East Fork San Jacinto River Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 4-1: West Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Map
Table 4-1: West Fork San Jacinto River Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
11250 FM 2854 main stem 33.1 7-Nov-07 10:48 144 4.7 2 16.0 255 0 WFSJ03 Honea Egypt Rd Lake Crk 28.2 7-Nov-07 15:20 250 5.4 3 18.2 197 0 11245 IH 45 main stem 25.0 7-Nov-07 14:50 39 20 3 19.6 755 0.1 16626 SH 75 Stwts Crk 24.5 7-Nov-07 11:40 34 1 2 15.4 277 0 16624 SH 242 main stem 18.6 7-Nov-07 10:32 230 25 3 18.5 646 0 16635 SH 242 Crystal Crk 18.2 7-Nov-07 10:50 13 2.6 3 18.0 655 0
WFSJ01 Sleepy Hollow tributary 13.9 7-Nov-07 10:05 14 n/a 3 17.6 290 0 WFSJ02 Riley Fuzzel tributary 6.4 7-Nov-07 9:15 86 n/a 2 17.5 990 0 13611 McCoy Lane main stem 5.1 7-Nov-07 8:15 13 58 3 16.6 637 0
1125
0 , F
M 2
854
WFS
J03
, Hon
ea E
gypt
Rd
1124
5 , I
H 4
516
626
, SH
Loo
p 33
6
1662
4 , S
H 2
4216
635
, SH
242
WFS
J01
, Sle
epy
Hol
low
WFS
J02
, Rile
y Fu
zzel
1361
1 , P
orte
r Hei
ghts
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemTributary
(Lk Houston)
Figure 4-2: West Fork San Jacinto River Bacteria Results Profile
1361
1 , M
cCoy
Lan
e
WFS
J02
, Rile
y Fu
zzel
WFS
J01
, Sle
epy
Hol
low16
635
, SH
242
1662
4 , S
H 2
42
1662
6 , S
H L
oop
336
1124
5 , I
H 4
5
WFS
J03
, Hon
ea E
gypt
Rd
1125
0 , F
M 2
854
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(Lk Houston)
Figure 4-3: West Fork San Jacinto River Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 4-4: Crystal Creek Sampling Map
Table 4-2: Crystal Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
CRC03 SH 105 main stem 11.6 7-Nov-07 9:25 152 1.1 3 14.7 420 0.04 CRC02 FM 1484 main stem 8.2 7-Nov-07 12:20 27 1.3 2 15.2 383 0 15804 FM 3083 main stem 6.6 7-Nov-07 11:38 91 1.4 3 16.3 363 0 CRC01 SH 105 tributary 6.4 7-Nov-07 9:50 21 0 1 15.5 265 n/a 15805 FM 3083 tributary 6.4 7-Nov-07 11:50 86 0.9 3 15.0 2130 0.25 11181 FM 1314 main stem 2.9 7-Nov-07 11:12 107 2.5 3 16.5 660 0 16635 SH 242 main stem 0.7 7-Nov-07 10:50 13 2.6 3 18.0 655 0
CR
C03
, S
H 1
05
CR
C02
, FM
148
4
1580
4 , F
M 3
083
CR
C01
, S
H 1
0515
805
, FM
308
3
1118
1 , F
M 1
314
1663
5 , S
H 2
42
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemTributary
(West Fork)
Figure 4-5: Crystal Creek Bacteria Results Profile
1663
5 , S
H 2
42
1118
1 , F
M 1
314
1580
5 , F
M 3
083
CR
C01
, SH
105
1580
4 , F
M 3
083
CR
C02
, FM
148
4
CR
C03
, SH
105
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
1
2
3
4
5Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(West Fork)
Figure 4-6: Crystal Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 4-7: Stewarts Creek Sampling Map
Table 4-3: Stewarts Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
STC04 SH 75 main stem 12.7 7-Nov-07 7:50 11 < 0.1 3 16.6 118 n/a STC03 FM 3083 main stem 9.5 7-Nov-07 8:15 93 0.2 3 14.2 148 0
STC03B FM 3083 main stem 9.5 7-Nov-07 8:25 24 0.2 3 14.2 148 n/a STC05 FM 3083 tributary 8.5 7-Nov-07 8:40 7 < 0.1 3 14.1 139 n/a STC02 N Loop 336 main stem 8.3 7-Nov-07 8:55 18 0.8 3 14.7 173 0 STC01 SH 105 main stem 6.3 7-Nov-07 10:16 67 1 3 15.2 196 n/a 11178 Silverdale Dr main stem 5.1 7-Nov-07 11:54 19 1 3 16.9 215 n/a 16626 S Loop 336 main stem 3.3 7-Nov-07 11:40 34 1 2 15.4 277 0
STC
04 ,
SH 7
5
STC
03 ,
FM 3
083
STC
03B
, FM
308
3
STC
05 ,
FM 3
083
STC
02 ,
N L
oop
336
STC
01 ,
SH 1
05
1117
8 , S
ilver
dale
Dr
1662
6 , S
Loo
p 33
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0
River Station (mile)
E co
li (c
fu/1
00m
L)Main StemTributary
(West Fork)
Figure 4-8: Stewarts Creek Bacteria Results Profile
1662
6 , S
Loo
p 33
6
1117
8 , S
ilver
dale
Dr
STC
01 ,
SH 1
05
STC
02 ,
N L
oop
336
STC
05 ,
FM 3
083
STC
03 ,
FM 3
083
STC
04 ,
SH 7
5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(West Fork)
Figure 4-9: Stewarts Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 5-1: Spring Creek Sampling Map
Table 5-1: Spring Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
SC01 Murrell Rd main stem 53.8 8-Nov-07 10:08 7 0.2 2 15.8 232 n/a SC07 Glenmont Estates tributary 48.6 8-Nov-07 9:34 43 0.5 3 14.8 295 n/a 11323 Decker Prairie Rd main stem 45.1 8-Nov-07 9:05 42 < 2 3 15.3 240 0 SC03 Cypress Rosehill tributary 43.6 8-Nov-07 8:45 18 0.3 2 14.4 607 0 11314 SH 249 main stem 39.6 8-Nov-07 12:46 2800 < 5 3 18.4 280 0.04 SC02 Neidigk Lake Outfall tributary 36.6 8-Nov-07 13:05 3 < 5 3 20.0 262 0 17489 Kuykendahl Rd main stem 28.8 8-Nov-07 10:33 53 14 3 16.8 360 n/a 11185 Gosling Rd Willow Crk 21.6 8-Nov-07 9:00 < 1 5.7 3 16.6 860 0.8 11313 IH 45 main stem 16.8 8-Nov-07 8:25 210 27 3 15.7 545 n/a 11312 Riley Fuzzel Rd main stem 13.1 8-Nov-07 7:55 330 30 3 16.5 575 n/a
1131
2, R
iley
Fuzz
el R
d
1131
3, IH
45
1118
5, G
oslin
g R
d
1748
9, K
uyke
ndah
l Rd
SC
02, N
eidg
t Lak
e O
utfa
ll
1131
4, S
H 2
49
SC
03, C
ypre
ss R
oseh
ill11
323,
Dec
ker P
rairi
e R
d
SC07
, Gle
nmon
t Est
ates
SC01
, Mur
rell
Rd
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemTributary
2800 cfu/100mL
(Lk Houston)
Figure 5-2: Spring Creek Bacteria Results Profile
1131
3, IH
45
1131
3, IH
45
1118
5, G
oslin
g R
d
1748
9, K
uyke
ndah
l Rd
SC
02, N
eidg
t Lak
e O
utfa
ll
1131
4, S
H 2
49
SC
03, C
ypre
ss R
oseh
ill11
323,
Dec
ker P
rairi
e R
d
SC
07, G
lenm
ont E
stat
es
SC
01, M
urre
ll R
d
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS
/cm
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(Lk Houston)
Figure 5-3: Spring Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 5-4: Upper Panther Branch Sampling Map
Table 5-2: Upper Panther Branch Sampling Results Station Code Description Station Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
UPB02 FM 1488 main stem 3.5 7-Nov-07 16:30 5 < 0.1 2 18.1 257 n/a UPB03 Green Bridge Dr main stem 1.9 7-Nov-07 16:15 64 0.1 2 16.9 280 n/a 16629 above WWTP main stem 0.3 7-Nov-07 15:35 171 0.1 1 17.7 327 0.04 UPB04 Woodlands WWTP 0.2 7-Nov-07 15:50 106 5.6 n/a 23.1 948 0.04 16630 below WWTP main stem 0.2 7-Nov-07 16:00 78 5.7 3 23.6 912 n/a UPB05 Old Egypt Center WWTP 0.0 7-Nov-07 15:55 < 1 0.09 n/a 21.5 1545 > 3.5 UPB01 Kuykendahl Rd Bear Branch 0.0 7-Nov-07 16:25 9 0.2 2 19.7 278 n/a 16631 Research Forest Bear Branch 0.0 7-Nov-07 15:05 79 0.2 3 18.5 353 0.04 16632 Gosling Rd main stem -0.4 7-Nov-07 14:40 66 6 3 23.4 847 0.06
UP
B02,
FM
148
8
UP
B03
, Gre
en B
ridge
Dr 16
629,
abo
ve W
WTP
UP
B04
, Woo
dlan
ds16
630,
bel
ow W
WTP
UP
B01,
Kuy
kend
ahl R
d16
631,
Res
earc
h Fo
rest
1663
2, G
oslin
g R
d
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemTributaryWWTP
(Bear Branch)
Figure 5-5: Upper Panther Branch Bacteria Results Profile
UP
B02
, FM
148
8
UP
B03
, Gre
en B
ridge
Dr
1662
9, a
bove
WW
TPU
PB
04, W
oodl
ands
1663
0, b
elow
WW
TPU
PB
01, K
uyke
ndah
l Rd
1663
1, R
esea
rch
Fore
st
1663
2, G
oslin
g R
d
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS
/cm
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTPMain Stem Flow
(Bear Branch)
Figure 5-6: Upper Panther Branch Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 5-7: Willow Creek Sampling Map
Table 5-3: Willow Creek Sampling Results
Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
WC05 Cypress Rosehill main stem 17.8 8-Nov-07 10:36 < 1 0 1 16.2 192 n/a WC04 Telge Rd main stem 15.4 8-Nov-07 10:56 6 0 1 18.8 199 n/a WC03 SH 249 main stem 12.8 8-Nov-07 11:55 31 < 0.1 2 19.0 198 0.08 WC07 Tomball WWTP 11.8 8-Nov-07 12:12 1 1.1 3 23.4 856 0.08 16426 Huffsmith Kohrville main stem 10.5 8-Nov-07 13:34 4 2 3 20.1 810 0.04 WC02 FM 2920 main stem 7.8 8-Nov-07 11:50 18 2 3 17.5 840 0 WC09 Dowdell WWTP 6.7 8-Nov-07 11:30 1 0.38 n/a 24.0 1310 2 WC01 Kuykendahl Rd main stem 5.5 8-Nov-07 10:55 104 3.4 3 17.5 785 0.1 WC06 W Rayford Rd tributary 5.4 8-Nov-07 10:05 26 < 2 3 19.1 1040 n/a WC08 Northhampton WWTP 1.7 8-Nov-07 9:27 < 1 0.65 3 22.8 964 > 3.5 11185 Gosling Rd main stem 1.4 8-Nov-07 9:00 < 1 5.7 3 16.6 860 0.8
WC
05, C
ypre
ss R
oseh
ill
WC
04, T
elge
Rd W
C03
, SH
249
WC
07, T
omba
ll
1642
6, H
uffs
mith
Koh
rville
WC
02, F
M 2
920
WC
09, D
owde
ll
WC
01, K
uyke
ndah
l Rd
WC
06, W
Ray
ford
Rd
WC
08, N
orth
ham
pton
1118
5, G
oslin
g R
d
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.018.020.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemTributaryWWTP
(Spring Crk)
Figure 5-8: Willow Creek Bacteria Results Profile
WC
05, C
ypre
ss R
oseh
ill
WC
04, T
elge
Rd
WC
03, S
H 2
49
WC
07, T
omba
ll
1642
6, H
uffs
mith
Koh
rville
WC
02, F
M 2
920
WC
09, D
owde
ll
WC
01, K
uyke
ndah
l Rd
WC
06, W
Ray
ford
Rd WC
08, N
orth
ham
pton
1118
5, G
oslin
g R
d
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.018.020.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityWWTPTributaryMain Stem Flow
(Spring Crk)
Figure 5-9: Willow Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 6-1: Cypress Creek Sampling Map
Table 6-1: Cypress Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
CYC04 Mathis Rd main stem 56.9 9-Nov-07 9:05 25 < 0.1 1 18.2 495 n/a CYC01 Mathis Rd tributary 51.4 9-Nov-07 9:15 56 < 0.1 1 19.1 144 n/a CYC02 Hebet Rd main stem 49.8 9-Nov-07 9:35 7 < 0.1 1 19.9 205 n/a CYC03 Katy Hockley main stem 41.4 9-Nov-07 9:55 21 < 0.1 1 19.9 283 n/a 11333 House Hahl Rd main stem 35.5 9-Nov-07 10:30 28 < 5 3 20.4 940 n/a 14159 Kluge Rd Little Cy Crk 27.8 9-Nov-07 14:45 1 3.2 3 23.8 830 0.35 11332 Grant Rd main stem 25.7 9-Nov-07 10:46 17 30 3 19.0 751 n/a 17496 Cypress Crk Dr Faulkey G 23.6 9-Nov-07 11:06 34 1.7 3 20.6 770 0.04 11331 SH 249 main stem 22.5 9-Nov-07 10:19 12 33 3 20.1 770 0.04 CYC0A Louetta Rd tributary 21.5 9-Nov-07 9:55 936 0.4 3 22.4 522 n/a 11330 Steubner-Airline main stem 17.3 9-Nov-07 9:30 154 36 3 19.5 830 n/a 17481 Spg Crk Oaks Dr Spring G 16.0 8-Nov-07 15:18 320 1 3 20.9 1060 n/a 11328 IH 45 main stem 9.9 9-Nov-07 8:08 85 42 3 19.3 841 0.04 11324 Cypresswood Dr main stem 2.0 9-Nov-07 8:47 49 48 3 19.3 808 n/a
1132
4, C
ypre
ssw
ood
Dr
1132
8, IH
45
1748
1, S
pg C
rk O
aks
Dr
1133
0, S
teub
ner-
Airli
ne
1133
1, S
H 2
4917
496,
Cyp
ress
Crk
Dr
1133
2, G
rant
Rd
1415
9, K
luge
Rd
1133
3, H
ouse
Hah
l Rd
CYC
03, K
aty
Hoc
kley
CYC
02, H
ebet
Rd
CYC
01, M
athi
s R
d
CYC
04, M
athi
s R
d
CYC
0A, L
ouet
ta R
d
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0
River Station (mile)
E co
li (c
fu/1
00m
L)Main StemTributary
936
(Spring Crk)
Figure 6-2: Cypress Creek Bacteria Results Profile
1132
4, C
ypre
ssw
ood
Dr
1132
8, IH
4517
481,
Spg
Crk
Oak
s D
r
CYC
04, M
athi
s R
d
CYC
01, M
athi
s R
dC
YC02
, Heb
et R
d
CYC
03, K
aty
Hod
dey
1133
3, H
ouse
Hah
l Rd
1415
9, K
luge
Rd
1133
2, G
rant
Rd
1749
6, C
ypre
ss C
rk D
r11
331,
SH
249
CYC
0A, L
ouet
ta R
d
1133
0, S
teub
ner-
Airli
ne
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.010.020.030.040.050.060.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(Spring Crk)
Figure 6-3: Cypress Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 6-4: Faulkey Gully Sampling Map
Table 6-2: Faulkey Gully Sampling Results Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
FG01 Shaw Rd main stem 4.8 9-Nov-07 15:49 24 < 0.05 2 23.0 571 n/a FG06 NWHC MUD 15 WWTP 3.7 9-Nov-07 15:24 174 0.5 n/a 25.7 1199 0 FG02 Spring Cypress Rd main stem 3.1 9-Nov-07 15:05 125 1.2 3 22.0 975 n/a FG05 Faulkey G. MUD WWTP 1.7 9-Nov-07 12:12 300 0.94 n/a 23.5 1002 0.1 FG03 Louetta Rd main stem 1.5 9-Nov-07 11:38 8 2.2 3 22.5 740 0.04 FG0A Lkwood Forest Dr tributary 0.6 9-Nov-07 11:20 350 < 0.05 n/a 22.5 1049 0.1 17496 Lkwood Forest Dr main stem 0.5 9-Nov-07 11:06 34 n/a 3 20.6 770 0.04
1749
6, L
kwoo
d Fo
rest
Dr
FG0A
, Lkw
ood
Fore
st D
r
FG03
, Lou
etta
Rd
FG05
, Fau
lkey
G. M
UD
FG02
, Spr
ing
Cyp
ress
Rd
FG06
, NW
HC
MU
D 1
5
FG01
, Sha
w R
d
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0
River Station (mile)
E co
li (c
fu/1
00m
L)Main StemTributaryWWTP
(Cypress Crk)
Figure 6-5: Faulkey Gully Bacteria Results Profile
1749
6, L
kwoo
d Fo
rest
Dr
FG0A
, Lkw
ood
Fore
st D
r
FG03
, Lou
etta
Rd
FG05
, Fau
lkey
G. M
UD
FG02
, Spr
ing
Cyp
ress
Rd
FG06
, NW
HC
MU
D 1
5
FG01
, Sha
w R
d
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTPMain Stem Flow
(Cypress Crk)
Figure 6-6: Faulkey Gully Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 6-7: Spring Gully Sampling Map
Table 6-3: Spring Gully Sampling Results Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
SG09 NWHC MUD 32 WWTP 4.6 8-Nov-07 15:55 718 0.64 n/a 20.8 990 0.04 SG05 Pine Lakes Blvd main stem 4.5 8-Nov-07 16:10 7 0.64 2 24.4 1155 n/a SG04 Spring Cypress Rd main stem 3.5 8-Nov-07 14:36 26 0.64 3 21.5 1102 0.08 SG06 Klein Cemetary Rd tributary 3.1 8-Nov-07 14:25 691 < 0.02 2 18.4 317 n/a SG03 Fairway Oaks Dr main stem 3.0 8-Nov-07 15:39 9 0.65 3 21.9 1050 n/a SG02 Spring Cypress Rd tributary 2.1 8-Nov-07 14:51 6 0.05 2 22.7 717 0.04 SG07 Bilma WWTP WWTP 2.1 8-Nov-07 15:11 1 0.37 n/a 23.9 1037 1.8 SG01 Jester Rd tributary 2.1 8-Nov-07 15:28 28 0.41 3 23.3 1027 0.7 17481 Spring Crk Oaks Dr main stem 2.0 8-Nov-07 15:18 320 1 3 20.9 1060 n/a
SG
01, J
este
r Rd
1748
1, S
prin
g C
rk O
aks
Dr
SG07
, Bilm
a W
WTP
SG
03, F
airw
ay O
aks
Dr
SG06
, Kle
in C
emet
ary
Rd
SG04
, Spr
ing
Cyp
ress
Rd
SG05
, Pin
e La
kes
Blvd
SG09
, NW
HC
MU
D 3
2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
River Station (mile)
E co
li (c
fu/1
00m
L)
Main StemTributaryWWTP
(Cypress Crk)
Figure 6-8: Spring Gully Bacteria Results Profile
SG01
, Jes
ter R
d17
481,
Spr
ing
Crk
Oak
s D
r
SG07
, Bilm
a W
WTP
SG03
, Fai
rway
Oak
s D
r
SG06
, Kle
in C
emet
ary
RdSG
04, S
prin
g C
ypre
ss R
d
SG05
, Pin
e La
kes
Blvd
SG09
, NW
HC
MU
D 3
2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTPMain Stem Flow
(Cypress Crk)
Figure 6-9: Spring Gully Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 6-10: Little Cypress Creek Sampling Map
Table 6-4: Little Cypress Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
LCC01 Bauer Rd main stem 14.4 9-Nov-07 11:10 27 0.31 2 20.0 741 0 LCC02 Mueschke Rd main stem 9.6 9-Nov-07 11:35 25 < 0.1 2 20.4 185 0 LCC03 Rosehill Rd main stem 7.3 9-Nov-07 12:00 14 0.5 2 20.2 147 n/a LCC04 Spring Cypress Rd main stem 3.5 9-Nov-07 12:15 32 1.9 3 21.5 431 n/a LCC05 NWHC MUD 5 WWTP 2.9 9-Nov-07 12:35 8 0.66 3 26.2 1050 1.7 LCC06 Grant Rd PUD WWTP 1.8 9-Nov-07 13:36 < 1 0.31 2 25.6 741 2 LCC07 HC MUD 36 WWTP 1.7 9-Nov-07 15:10 < 1 0.31 3 26.8 1275 > 3.5 14159 Kluge Rd main stem 1.4 9-Nov-07 14:45 1 3.2 3 23.8 830 0.35
LCC
07, H
C M
UD
36
1415
9, K
luge
Rd
LCC
06, G
rant
Rd
PUD
LCC
05, N
WH
C M
UD
5
LCC
04, S
prin
g C
ypre
ss R
d
LCC
03, R
oseh
ill R
d
LCC
02, M
uesc
hke
Rd
LCC
01, B
auer
Rd
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.0
River Station (mile)
E co
li (c
fu/1
00m
L)
Main StemWWTP
(Cypress Crk)
Figure 6-11: Little Cypress Creek Bacteria Results Profile
LCC
07, H
C M
UD
36
1415
9, K
luge
Rd
LCC
06, G
rant
Rd
PUD
LCC
05, N
WH
C M
UD
5
LCC
04, S
prin
g C
ypre
ss R
d
LCC
03, R
oseh
ill R
d
LCC
02, M
uesc
hke
Rd
LCC
01, B
auer
Rd
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityWWTPMain Stem Flow
(Cypress Crk)
Figure 6-12: Little Cypress Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 8-1: Caney Creek Sampling Map
Table 8-1: Caney Creek Sampling Results Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
CC02 FM 1097 main stem 41.0 2-Nov-07 9:38 17 0.5 2 16.4 392 n/a 14241 SH 105 main stem 27.6 2-Nov-07 10:45 36 9.5 3 17.5 96 n/a 11335 FM 2090 main stem 20.2 2-Nov-07 13:10 18 11.5 3 18.6 98 n/a CC05 Conroe ISD WWTP 20.2 2-Nov-07 13:20 2500 0.12 n/a 22.0 925 0.200 CC03 SH 242 tributary 10.5 2-Nov-07 9:25 127 < 1 1 16.2 168 0.000 CC06 Lone Star Ranch WWTP 9.8 2-Nov-07 15:15 19 0.32 n/a 24.6 840 > 3.500 CC01 FM 1485 tributary 9.8 2-Nov-07 9:45 570 0.9 2 16.6 302 0.000 11334 FM 1485 main stem 6.2 2-Nov-07 10:30 99 17 3 17.2 123 0.150 CC0A New Caney MUD WWTP 4.9 2-Nov-07 16:10 25 0.72 n/a 23.2 640 0.415 CC04 SH 494 tributary 0.7 2-Nov-07 10:55 150 n/a 1 19.0 207 n/a
CC
02, F
M 1
097
1424
1, S
H 1
05
1133
5, F
M 2
090
CC
05, C
onro
e IS
D
CC
03, S
H 2
42
CC
06, L
one
Sta
r Ran
ch
CC
01, F
M 1
485
1133
4, F
M 1
485
CC
0A, N
ew C
aney
MU
D
CC
04, S
H 4
94
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemTributaryWWTP
2500 cfu/100mL
(Lk Houston)
Figure 8-2: Caney Creek Bacteria Results Profile
CC
04, S
H 4
94
CC
0A, N
ew C
aney
MU
D11
334,
FM
148
5CC
01, F
M 1
485
CC
06, L
one
Sta
r Ran
ch
CC
03, S
H 2
42
CC
05, C
onro
e IS
D11
335,
FM
209
0
1424
1, S
H 1
05CC
02, F
M 1
097
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.0
River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS
/cm
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Fl
ow (c
fs)
Main Stem ConductivityTributary ConductivityWWTP ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(Lk Houston)
Figure 8-3: Caney Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile
Figure 9-1: Peach Creek Sampling Map
Table 9-1: Peach Creek Sampling Results
Station Code Description Station
Type Station
Mile Sample
Date Sample
Time E. coli
(cfu/100mL) Flow Est.
(cfs) Flow*
Severity Temp
(C) Cond
(μS/cm) Total Cl2 (mg/L)
PC01 FM 3081 main stem 33.1 2-Nov-07 10:11 191 9.4 3 16.9 47 n/a 11338 SH 105 main stem 19.4 2-Nov-07 11:05 240 12.8 3 16.2 46 n/a 16625 Old Hwy 105 main stem 18.1 2-Nov-07 11:35 132 13.4 3 16.9 47 n/a 11337 FM 2090 main stem 9.4 2-Nov-07 12:50 250 16 3 17.5 66 n/a PC02 MC MUD #16 WWTP 5.7 2-Nov-07 16:35 2 0.62 n/a 22.5 505 2.8 PC04 Woodbranch WWTP 4.3 2-Nov-07 17:15 > 20000 0.34 n/a 23.1 765 0.04 PC0A Roman Forest WWTP 4.0 2-Nov-07 17:20 1 0.25 n/a 24.0 786 2.5 11336 FM 1485 main stem 2.3 2-Nov-07 11:25 95 18 3 17.5 102 n/a 17746 Lk Houston Park main stem 1.6 2-Nov-07 12:10 117 18 3 18.3 106 n/a
PC
01, F
M 3
081
1133
8, S
H 1
05
1662
5, O
ld H
wy
105 11
337,
FM
209
0
PC
02, M
C M
UD
#16
PC04
, Woo
dbra
nch
PC
0A, R
oman
For
est
1133
6, F
M 1
485
1774
6, L
k H
oust
on P
ark
0
100
200
300
400
500
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0River Station (mile)
E c
oli (
cfu/
100m
L)
Main StemWWTP
>20,000 cfu/100mL
(Caney Crk)
Figure 9-2: Peach Creek Bacteria Results Profile
1774
6, L
k H
oust
on P
ark
1133
6, F
M 1
485
PC
0A, R
oman
For
est
PC
04, W
oodb
ranc
h
PC
02, M
C M
UD
#16
1133
7, F
M 2
090
1662
5, O
ld H
wy
105
1133
8, S
H 1
05
PC01
, FM
308
1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0.05.010.015.020.025.030.035.0River Station (mile)
Con
duct
ivity
(uS/
cm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Flow
(cfs
)Main Stem ConductivityWWTP ConductivityMain Stem Flow
(Caney Crk)
Figure 9-3: Peach Creek Conductivity and Flow Results Profile