formation evaluation pete 663 - petroleum · pdf fileformation evaluation pete 663. summer...
TRANSCRIPT
PASSIVE MEASUREMENTS - SP
FORMATION EVALUATION
PETE 663
Summer 2010
Dr. David Schechter
LOG PRESENTATION - THE HEADING
• Well location• Depth references
• Well depth
• Date of log
• Casing shoe depth
• Bit size
• Mud data
– Type– Properties
– Resistivities• Max. Temperature
DRILLING DISTURBS FORMATION
• Drilling and rock crushing• Damage zone
• Mud systems and invasion• Oil based mud
• Small conductivity mud
• Shallow invasion• Thin cake
• Water based mud• Moderate to very conductive
mud• Shallow to deep invasion• Thin to thick cake
Mudcake
Invading filtrate
Damaged zone
MUD FILTRATE INVASION
Modified from J. Jensen, PETE 321 Lecture Notes
WellboreMud(Rm)
Mud Cake(Rmc)
Uninvaded Zone(Rt)
Invaded Zone (Rxo)
Uninvaded Zone(Rt)
BoreholeRm : Borehole mud resistivityRmc : Mudcake resistivity
Invaded zoneRmf : Mud filtrate resistivityRxo : Invaded zone resistivitySxo : Invaded zone water saturation
Uninvaded zoneRw : Interstitial water resistivityRt : Uninvaded zone resistivitySw : Uninvaded zone water saturation
COMMON TERMINOLOGY
PASSIVE MEASUREMENTS• Caliper• Spontaneous Potential• Gamma Ray
• Natural• Spectral
CALIPERS• Uses
• Hole volume• Mudcake (permeability)• Tool corrections• Crude lithology indicator
• Properties• Two, three, or four arms• Linked or independent
• Calipers may disagree (limitations)• Non-circular hole• Deviated wells
Two-arm caliper
actualapparent
Three-arm caliper
actualapparent
arm
arm
CALIPER INTERPRETATION• Hole volumes
• In general, more arms give better accuracy• Two arms < 100% error• Three arms < 20% error
• Mud cake• If dcaliper < dbit
• hmc = (dbit - dcaliper)/2
• Lithology• Shales may indicate borehole enlargement• Spikey curve may indicate fractures
SP – DEFINITION• SP is a natural occurring electrical potential relative to a surface potential measured in the borehole mud
• Potentials are created by chemically induced electric current
• The potential of the surface reference must remain constant
USES OF SP
1. Determine values of formation water resistivity
2. Identify permeable zones
3. Qualitative indication of shale content
4. Define bed boundaries
5. Well-to-well correlation
SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL (SP)
• Uses• Correlation• Lithology• Shaliness indicator• Depositional environment
indicator
• Properties• Measures formation voltage• Passive measurement
Ransom, PFE
++++----++++
-12mV
+59mV
-71mV
POROUS,PERMEABLE
BED
SHALE
SHALE
• One electrode
• Insulators on either side
• Surface ground electrode – at a stable potential
THE SP TOOL
SHALE
SHALE
SAND
SP PRINCIPLES• Must have water-based mud• Mud--formation water
salinity difference causes battery effect
• Battery effect components• Electrochemical
• Liquid Junction Potential, Ej
• In permeable region• Anions more mobile than cations• Membrane Effect, Em
• Shale acts as membrane• Repels anions / passes cations
• Electrokinetic (Streaming)• Usually minor, disregarded
Electrochemical Effect
Membrane effect
SAND
SHALE
FlushedZone
Less SaltyWater
VirginZone
SaltyWater
Membrane effect
VirginZone
+++++
ORIGIN OF SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL
The electrochemical potential sensed in the borehole is generated by the sum of two potentials known as the membrane potential and Em and the liquid junction potential Ej.
Ec = Em + Ej
LIQUID JUNCTION POTENTIAL
A liquid junction potential develops when a concentrated salt solution (formation water ) is in direct contact with a diluted salt solution (fresh mud filtrate)
The net effect of more positive ions in formation water and more negative ions in mud filtrate creates potential difference.
MEMBRANE POTENTIAL, Em
Created when a shale is introduced between a concentrated salt solution(formation water) and a diluted salt solution (fresh mud filtrate)
SP CURRENTSNote:
Reverse SP occurs when formation water is fresher than mud filtrate
TYPICAL SP RESPONSES – BASED ON THE
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN Rw and Rmf.
5. Rmf << Rw - Amplitude large and positive
4 . Rmf < Rw - Amplitude positive but not large
3. Rmf = Rw - No SP deflection
2. Rmf > Rw - Amplitude negative but not large
1. Rmf >> Rw - Amplitude large and negative
REV
ERSE
D S
PN
OR
MA
L SP
1
2
3
4
5
(+)
(-)
STATIC SP (SSP)
If it were possible to prevent SP currents from flowing and measure the potential of mud this would provide a value for the SSP
Conditions where the SSP is recorded directly:
1. Thick zones
2. Clean (no shale) zones
3. Only water – bearing zones
4. Permeable zones
SELECTING A 100% WATER SATURATED ZONE
Low resistivity suggesting a water bearing formation
Low GR response and high SP deflection
SELECTING A SHALE BASE LINE
Shale base line is the SP response across a thick shale or several shale intervals
Sandstone baseline
20mV
- 110 mV
PSEUDO- STATIC SP (PSP)
• Presence of shale in the formation will reduce the static SP
• Shale lattice will slow the migration of chlorine ions and assist the flow of sodium ions, decreasing Ej
• This reduces SSP to a pseudo-static value, PSP
• The volume of shale can be calculated:
Vsh = 1- (PSP)/(SSP)
EXAMPLE PROBLEM
SP RESPONSEIN THINBEDS
USING THE SP EQUATION FORRw DETERMIMATION - CLASSICAL METHOD
1. Determine formation temperature
2. Find Rmf at formation temperature
3. Convert Rmf at formation temperature to Rmfe value
4. Compute Rmfe / Rwe ratio from the SP
5. Compute the Rwe
6. Convert Rwe at formation temperature to Rw
USING THE SP EQUATION FOR Rw
To determine Rw, we must know:1. Formation Temp, Tf
• Actual temp reading or• BHT and geotherm
gradient• Chart GEN-2 (H) GEN-6
(S)2. Rmf at Tf
• Actual measurement or• Correct surface Rmf• Chart GEN-5 (H) GEN-9
(S)• or Arp’s equation• R1(T1 + 7) = R2(T2 + 7) (T ºF)
• R1(T1 + 21.5) = R2(T2 + 21.5) (T ºC)
3. Essp• SP log
A
Original sample: Rw = 0.1 ohm-m@ 150F;What is Rw at formation temperature (Tf),which is 250F?
Rw = 0.058 ohm-m
0.1 ohm-m, 150
0.58 ohm-m, 250
1
2
43
H, GEN-5
THE SP EQUATION - 1
• Define Essp = (Esp)max
• We assume:
• From electrochemical theory:
where Tf = formation temp, deg Faw = formation water activityamf = mud filtrate activityEssp = max SP deflection, mV
)/(log)460(133.0 10 mfwfssp aaTE +−=
)( mlssp EEE +≈
-20mV+
- 80 mV
- 60 mV
Shale
CleanSand
-20 mV
ShalySand
SandyShale
Shale
Essp
Shale Baseline
B
THE SP EQUATION - 2• Difficult to measure activities• Substitute resistivities for activities
• For small salinities, a = 1/R– For fresh mud filtrate, assume– Rmfe = Rmf or– Rmfe = 0.85Rmf (Schlumberger)
• For high salinities– Correction needed– Use Chart SP-2 (Schlumberger)– Use Chart SP-3 (Halliburton)
)/(log)273(24.0
)/(log)460(133.0
10
10
wemfefssp
wemfefssp
RRTE
RRTE
+−=
+−=
Rw or Rmf
Rw
eor
Rm
fe
C
EXAMPLE• Determine Rmf @Tf (Arp’s Eq.)
– 5.6(11+21.5)/(33+21.5) = 3.3Ωm
• Apply SP equation– -50 = -0.24(33+273)log(3.3/Rwe)– Rwe = 0.68– Chart SP-2 gives Rw = 1.3 ohm-m
(See next page)
D
10mV-|↔|+
Rmf = 5.6Ωm @ 11º CTf = 33º C
• Determine Essp– Shale base line– Maximum deflection line
– Calculate deflection -50mV
Rarely known
Usually use charts, instead
Rw or Rmf
Rw
eor
Rm
fe
Rwe=0.68
Rw = 1.3
F
PROBLEMThe SP deflection is –60 mV across a thick, water-
bearing, clean zone. The value of Rmf at that temperature of 100° F is 0.5 ohm-m.
Determine Rw at the same temperature (100° F)
Rw from SP: Classical Method First, we determine the Rmfe (effective Rmf), since
the resistivity is not an accurate determination of the ion activity that produces the SP.
Rw ESTIMATION FROM Rwe
Rmfe = 0.45 ohm-m at 100° F.
Figure 9-13 in the manual.
1. Determine Rmfe
0.5,100F
0.45 ohm-m
Rmf, 0.5 ohm-m
2. Determine Rwe from
Rmfe
Figure 9-14of your manual
Rmfe/Rwe = 7. Therefore,
Rwe=0.45 ohm-m/7=0.064 ohm-m at 100° F
Rw ESTIMATION FROM SSP
60, 1007
SSP
(Rwe=0.064 ohm-m at 100°F)
3. Finally, determine Rw
• Using Figure 9-13 of your text again, we determine Rw=0.10 ohm-m at 100° F
• Here, Rw<Rmf. This problem illustrates the fact that if Rw<Rmf, SP deflection is negative (0.1<0.45 ohm-m)
(Normal SP)
Rw ESTIMATION FROM Rwe
0.064 mV
0.064, 100F
THE SILVA-BASSIOUNI METHOD
Figure 9-16 of your text.
Rw ESTIMATION FROM Rwe
For the same problem as before, ie Rmf=0.5 ohmm at 100° F, determine Rw if the SP deflection is –60 mV.
We see Rw=0.1 ohm-m, as shown with the classical method.
Figure 9-16 of your text
145 mV – 60 mV = 85mV
COMPARISON OF THE CLASSICAL AND SILVA-BASSIOUNI METHOD
• The classical method requires 3 steps for the determination of Rw.
• The Silva Bassiouni method combines Fig 9-13 and 9-14 into one chart ( Fig 9-16 ) and gives you the same value of Rw. Hence it is easier to use.
FACTORS AFFECTING THE SP RESPONSE
• Hydrocarbons: reduce the SP deflection• Shaliness: reduces the SP deflection• Bed thickness: thin beds do not develop a full SP
deflection• Permeability: low permeability zones will have a very
high invasion diameter, so it may be impossible to read the Junction Potential, hence SP readings may be low
OTHER SP ISSUES
• Shaliness
• Environmental– Uses curve shape
• Permeabilityindication– POOR perm predictor
• SP value & polaritydepend on salinity contrast
sspspsh EEV /1−=SSP = -K log Rmfe
Rwe
Rmf = Rw Rmf <RwSALINE MUD
Rmf >RwFRESH MUD
ZONATION• Zonation - Defines intervals of similar properties• Purpose
• Well-to-well correlation• Evaluation of specific intervals
• Criteria• Lithology• Fluids• Porosity and permeability
• Begin with coarse zonation• Typically
• Well-to-well correlation 20 - 100 ft• Detail evaluation 10 ft thick or more
• Easy lithologies first, e.g., shales• Refine
• More subtle lithology changes• Fluids in porous, perm intervals• Depends on measurements available
PASSIVE LOG CORRELATION
• GR, SP, and CAL• Often correlate• Different
measurements• Different reasons
• Correlation helps• GR instead of SP in
oil base mud• Easier detection of
shales• Facilitates “zonation”
SUMMARY• Drilling process affects formation
• Alters rock near wellbore• Invasion
• Passive logs respond to borehole, formation, and fluids• Caliper
• Simple measurement• Care needed when interpreting and
comparing caliper• SP
• Needs water based mud• Estimates Rw
EXTRA SLIDES FOLLOW
MEMBRANE POTENTIAL
LIQUID JUNCTION SP
LIQUID JUNCTION EFFECTS