fourthredd+surveysummaryresultsnov jan(2012)

8/3/2019 FourthREDD+SurveySummaryResultsNov Jan(2012)

1/231 of 23

Aggregated REDD+ Governance Survey 4

1. Please specify the sector to which you belong:

Response

Percent

Response

Count

Environmental 57.4% 31

Social 1.9% 1

Economic 1.9% 1

Government 22.2% 12

Secretariat, or other institutionalcomponent

3.7% 2

Other 13.0% 7

If 'other' please specify10

answered question 54

skipped question 5

2. Please indicate your region

Response

Percent

Response

Count

Global North 31.5% 17

Global South 68.5% 37


skipped question 5


2/232 of 23

3. This question concerns the level of inclusiveness of REDD+. Q3: Do you think REDD+ isinclusive of your interests? What rating would you give?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+ 15.4%(8)

28.8%(15)

40.4%(21)

13.5%(7)

1.9% (1) 3.42 52

UN-REDD16.3%

(8)36.7%

(18)

32.7%

(16)

12.2%

(6)2.0% (1) 3.53 49

FCPF20.8%

(10)27.1%

(13)

25.0%

(12)

25.0%

(12)2.1% (1) 3.40 48

FIP 8.7% (4)23.9%

(11)37.0%

(17)

26.1%

(12)4.3% (2) 3.07 46

REDD+ Partnership20.0%

(10)

22.0%

(11)34.0%

(17)

22.0%

(11)2.0% (1) 3.36 50

Please add comments if you want to. Remember to specify WHICH mechanism you are talking about

(UNFCCC-REDD+, or UN-REDD, or FCPF, or REDD+ Partnership). You can talk about all or any of the

five, just be clear which one you mean.10


skipped question 5


3/233 of 23

4. This question concerns the degree to which REDD+ treats all interests equally. Q4: Doyou think REDD+ treats all interests equally? What rating would you give?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+ 7.7% (4) 26.9%(14)

42.3%(22)

19.2%(10)

3.8% (2) 3.15 52

UN-REDD10.0%

(5)

30.0%

(15)42.0%

(21)

18.0%

(9)0.0% (0) 3.32 50

FCPF 4.4% (2)24.4%

(11)44.4%

(20)

22.2%

(10)4.4% (2) 3.02 45

FIP 2.3% (1)13.6%

(6)50.0%

(22)

29.5%

(13)4.5% (2) 2.80 44

REDD+ Partnership 8.5% (4)27.7%

(13)42.6%

(20)

17.0%

(8)4.3% (2) 3.19 47





skipped question 6


4/234 of 23

5. This question concerns the amount of resources provided to you by any of themechanisms to participate in REDD+ programmes and projects. 'Resources' meansmoney for travel or hotel costs or per diem expenses, or technical assistance, or otherkinds of support. Q5: What level of resources does REDD+ provide for you to participate?What rating would you give?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+ 4.3% (2) 6.5% (3)32.6%

(15)

17.4%

(8)39.1%

(18)2.20 46

UN-REDD 4.2% (2)12.5%

(6)

22.9%

(11)

18.8%

(9)41.7%

(20)2.19 48

FCPF 0.0% (0)11.4%

(5)

20.5%

(9)

15.9%

(7)

52.3%

(23)1.91 44

FIP 2.4% (1)12.2%

(5)

14.6%

(6)

19.5%

(8)51.2%

(21)1.95 41


(6)

26.7%

(12)

13.3%

(6)44.4%

(20)2.16 45





skipped question 7


5/235 of 23

6. This question concerns the extent to which the various institutional elementsassociated with REDD+ act in an accountable manner. Q6: Do you think the variousinstitutional elements in which you participate are accountable in their dealings with youregarding the REDD+ process? What rating would you give?

Very

high High Medium LowVery

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+ 8.7% (4)19.6%

(9)45.7%

(21)

13.0%

(6)

13.0%

(6)2.98 46

UN-REDD10.4%

(5)

16.7%

(8)45.8%

(22)

16.7%

(8)

10.4%

(5)3.00 48

FCPF 8.9% (4)24.4%

(11)40.0%

(18)8.9% (4)

17.8%

(8)2.98 45

FIP 2.6% (1)17.9%

(7)43.6%

(17)

17.9%

(7)

17.9%

(7)2.69 39


(5)48.9%

(22)

20.0%

(9)

13.3%

(6)2.78 45





skipped question 6


6/236 of 23

7. This question concerns the extent to which the various institutional elementsassociated with REDD+ act in a transparent manner. Q7: Do you think the variousinstitutional elements in which you participate are transparent in their dealings with youregarding the REDD+ process? What rating would you give?

Very


low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+12.5%

(6)

22.9%

(11)39.6%

(19)

18.8%

(9)6.3% (3) 3.17 48

UN-REDD14.9%

(7)

19.1%

(9)46.8%

(22)

14.9%

(7)4.3% (2) 3.26 47

FCPF 6.5% (3)26.1%

(12)39.1%

(18)

21.7%

(10)6.5% (3) 3.04 46

FIP 5.0% (2)15.0%

(6)45.0%

(18)

27.5%

(11)7.5% (3) 2.83 40


(5)

22.2%

(10)37.8%

(17)

22.2%

(10)6.7% (3) 3.09 45





skipped question 5


7/237 of 23

8. This question concerns the level of democracy in the various REDD+ processes. Q8:Do you consider the REDD+ processes in which you participate to act in a democraticmanner? What rating would you give?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+12.8%

(6)

21.3%

(10)38.3%

(18)

23.4%

(11)4.3% (2) 3.15 47

UN-REDD10.6%

(5)

25.5%

(12)44.7%

(21)

14.9%

(7)4.3% (2) 3.23 47

FCPF11.1%

(5)

26.7%

(12)37.8%

(17)

13.3%

(6)

11.1%

(5)3.13 45

FIP 5.4% (2)10.8%

(4)48.6%

(18)

24.3%

(9)

10.8%

(4) 2.76 37


(5)

23.3%

(10)37.2%

(16)

18.6%

(8)9.3% (4) 3.09 43





skipped question 5


8/238 of 23

9. This question concerns the making of agreements within REDD+ . Q9: Do you considerthe making of agreements in REDD+ to be effective? What rating would you give?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+ 11.1%(5)

15.6%(7)

31.1%(14)

31.1%(14)

11.1%(5)

2.84 45

UN-REDD10.9%

(5)

17.4%

(8)39.1%

(18)

26.1%

(12)6.5% (3) 3.00 46

FCPF 6.8% (3)27.3%

(12)31.8%

(14)

22.7%

(10)

11.4%

(5)2.95 44

FIP 2.6% (1)17.9%

(7)41.0%

(16)

25.6%

(10)

12.8%

(5)2.72 39


(8)31.0%

(13)

28.6%

(12)

14.3%

(6)2.76 42





skipped question 6


9/239 of 23

10. This question concerns the way in which disputes are settled within REDD+. Q10: Doyou consider the settling of disputes in REDD+ to be effective? What rating would yougive?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+ 4.3% (2)13.0%

(6)52.2%

(24)

17.4%

(8)

13.0%

(6)2.78 46

UN-REDD 6.4% (3)21.3%

(10)44.7%

(21)

19.1%

(9)8.5% (4) 2.98 47

FCPF 6.7% (3)26.7%

(12)35.6%

(16)

22.2%

(10)8.9% (4) 3.00 45

FIP 5.6% (2) 8.3% (3)44.4%

(16)

33.3%

(12) 8.3% (3) 2.69 36


(10)31.0%

(13)

28.6%

(12)

11.9%

(5)2.81 42





skipped question 7


10/2310 of 23

11. This question concerns the degree to which you think REDD+ will contribute tochanging the behaviour that leads to deforestation and forest degradation in developingcountries. Q11: Do you think REDD+ will contribute to changing the behaviour that leadsto deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries? What rating would yougive?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+12.5%

(6)

29.2%

(14)39.6%

(19)

12.5%

(6)6.3% (3) 3.29 48

UN-REDD12.2%

(6)34.7%

(17)

28.6%

(14)

20.4%

(10)4.1% (2) 3.31 49

FCPF10.9%

(5)

26.1%

(12)

30.4%

(14)

23.9%

(11)8.7% (4) 3.07 46

FIP11.9%

(5)

23.8%

(10)33.3%

(14)

21.4%

(9)9.5% (4) 3.07 42


(6)28.3%

(13)

21.7%

(10)

26.1%

(12)

10.9%

(5)3.07 46





skipped question 6


11/2311 of 23

12. This question concerns the degree to which you think REDD+ will help solve theproblem of deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. Q12: Do youthink REDD+ will help solve the problem of deforestation and forest degradation indeveloping countries? What rating would you give?

Very


low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+16.7%

(8)35.4%

(17)

27.1%

(13)

16.7%

(8)4.2% (2) 3.44 48

UN-REDD14.6%

(7)35.4%

(17)

31.3%

(15)

10.4%

(5)8.3% (4) 3.38 48

FCPF11.1%

(5)

26.7%

(12)37.8%

(17)

13.3%

(6)

11.1%

(5)3.13 45

FIP 9.5% (4)31.0%

(13)35.7%

(15)

14.3%

(6)9.5% (4) 3.17 42


(6)29.5%

(13)

22.7%

(10)

20.5%

(9)

13.6%

(6)3.09 44





skipped question 6


12/2312 of 23

13. This question concerns the durability of REDD+. 'Durability' here means long- lasting,resilient, flexible and adaptable. Q13: Do you consider REDD+ will be durable? Whatrating would you give?

Very

highHigh Medium Low

Very

low

Rating

Average

Response

Count

UNFCCC-REDD+14.3%

(7)

28.6%

(14)34.7%

(17)

14.3%

(7)8.2% (4) 3.27 49

UN-REDD12.5%

(6)35.4%

(17)

29.2%

(14)

16.7%

(8)6.3% (3) 3.31 48

FCPF 9.1% (4)31.8%

(14)

29.5%

(13)

20.5%

(9)9.1% (4) 3.11 44

FIP 7.1% (3)28.6%

(12)35.7%

(15)

16.7%

(7)

11.9%

(5) 3.02 42


(6)28.9%

(13)

24.4%

(11)

20.0%

(9)

13.3%

(6)3.09 45





skipped question 6

14. Is there anything else you would like to say?

Response

Count

11


skipped question 48


13/2313 of 23

Page 2, Q1. Please specify the sector to which you belong:

1 sustainable rural development [NGO] Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM

2 Indigenous women [NGO] Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 Environment Management Authority under Government Jan 14, 2012 1:22 AM

4 Civil society organization [NGO] Jan 3, 2012 6:44 PM5 Indigenous sector [NGO] Dec 21, 2011 8:10 AM

6 Private sector Dec 13, 2011 5:26 PM

7 development [NGO] Dec 13, 2011 2:22 AM

8 Non Governmental Organization [NGO] Dec 12, 2011 10:30 PM

9 Hindu kush himalayan Region [NGO] Nov 22, 2011 6:15 PM

10 Policy research Nov 22, 2011 4:36 PM


14/2314 of 23

Page 2, Q3. This question concerns the level of inclusiveness of REDD+.

Q3: Do you think REDD+ is inclusive of your interests?

What rating would you give?

1 UN-REDD enables VNGOs to participate in discussions on REDD+mechanism, however the development and implementation of REDD+ is stillvery much dominated by INGOs, with not enough focus on the benefits ofworking with local partners. FCPF and FIP mechanisms funnel through theGovernment, there would be benefit to ensuring VNGOs and their localknowledge is captured through partnerships and discussion forums.

Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM

2 The women don't know how to distinguish between these separate entities.We hope we have identified the right ones. Each has offered to includewomen to apply as delegates to various conferences and workshops

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 I work with the Congo Basin Forest partnersdhip and we work with all theseprocesses.

Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM

4 We at the initial phase of the UN - REDD readiness programme. We arebeing slow in getting the ball rolling mainly because of the minimalunderstanding of REDD process itself and the need for country-wideawareness.

Jan 3, 2012 1:26 PM

5 It is understood that all these programmes are here to allow industrialisedcountries to continue their high level of pollution and trying to get developingcountries with high forest cover and indigenous peoples to take theresponsibility and limiting their participation in the global conversation andtheir livelihoods without us fully understanding what these are all about andhow we could be impacted from all.

Dec 21, 2011 8:10 AM

6 Government is yet to participate in the UN-REDD in order to articulate herinterests under the National REDD+ Programme.

Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

7 The R+P is still suffereing from the dip in process and value for participantsand its future must be in doubt.

Dec 16, 2011 7:49 AM

8 I am more familiar with FCPF, which include SESA. Dec 13, 2011 5:26 PM

9 Transparency is essential for establishing credibility and legitimacy. In thisrespect the UNFCCC but also the WB funds rank higher than UN REDD.

Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

10 I'm not sure of what you want to realize from me but what I feel is that theprocesses to contain emissions from deforestation and forest degradationthrough global instruments like UNFCCC, UN-REDD or FCPF are taking toolong while deforestation rates especially in poor countries like those in AfricaSouth of the Sahara are increasing. These global mechanisms areconsidered sources of financial incentives but but so far the concentration ison undertaking studies and pilot projects while deforestation and forestdegradation is at large. There is need to move fast through these globalmechanisms to provide money that could be used at the grassroots level toenhance conservation through sustainable forest management and enhancecarbon stocks by making more trees alive than seeing them dead.

Nov 20, 2011 3:05 PM


15/2315 of 23

Page 2, Q4. This question concerns the degree to which REDD+ treats all interests equally.

Q4: Do you think REDD+ treats all interests equally?


1 We don't know from the position if distance and lack of communication to ourorganisations. This is probably due to technology limitation and not thoughany fault of the org.

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

2 UNFCCC-REDD+and UN-REDD, FCPF are very active here in the CongoBasin

Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM

3 I my view its not a question whether all interests are treated equally.UNFCCC is the convention on Climate Change and REDD+ is aboutreducing emissions or enhancing removals in order to mitigate climatechange. This does not mean that REDD+ don't have to take many differentinterest into account but not necessary on a equal level.

Dec 20, 2011 11:13 PM

4 Government is yet to participate in the UN-REDD in order to articulate herinterests under the National REDD+ Programme. Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

5 Difficult question to answer. Not sure if all interests can be treated equally -UNREDD and FCPF are making a big effort for their processes to beinclusive and make the input count.

Dec 16, 2011 7:49 AM

6 I am not clear, what does it mean the intersts mean. Dec 13, 2011 5:26 PM

7 The FIP followed a very bizarre methodology to select the first set ofrecipient countries. The idea was to follow a "scientific" process, which wasnot convincing at all, full of holes and discretion. The selection of recipientcountries is hence not convincing. Neither is the decision driven by powerfuldonors (in particular Norway) to exclude ECA and the transition countriesfrom the fund.

Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

8 REDD+ partnership didnt want at the begining to allow the participation ofcivil society. Nowadays civil society can be there but are the last to be ableto talk in meetings.

Nov 23, 2011 1:48 AM

9 I am closely working on FCPF and UNFCCC REDD+ Nov 22, 2011 6:15 PM


16/2316 of 23

Page 2, Q5. This question concerns the amount of resources provided to you by any of the mechanisms toparticipate in REDD+ programmes and projects.

'Resources' means money for travel or hotel costs or per diem expenses, or technical assistance, or otherkinds of support.

Q5: What level of resources d...

1 Funding from remote villages to represent indigenous communities is alwaysvery expensive and fails to meet a lot if incidental costs if internal domestictravel that makes even applying to attend training and representative orparticipatory activities prohibitive. Add to that the cost of visas and latenessof offers reaching the women due to limited access to communication.

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

2 I don,t benefit money froom these processes Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM

3 Non has funded my participation Dec 21, 2011 12:02 AM

4 Coming from a developed country I am paid for by my governmant. Dec 20, 2011 11:13 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

6 None - we're a secretariat. Dec 16, 2011 7:49 AM

7 not relevant to me Dec 13, 2011 12:23 PM

8 Indeed, there is no funds for it in what I am doing though I would appreciateto get this support.

Nov 22, 2011 6:36 PM

Page 2, Q6. This question concerns the extent to which the various institutional elements associated with

REDD+ act in an accountable manner.

Q6: Do you think the various institutional elements in which you participate are accountable in their dealingswith you regarding the REDD+ process?

What rating ...

1 Don't know Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

2 FCP supports many countries to set up their Rediness processses. Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

4 The questions seem to differ only in nuances. A bit repetetive. Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

5 UN REDD has a very "funny" way of building guidelines. They "call" regionalconsultations to meetings in very expensive hotels to a group of people whoare presented elements of the "guides". Interesting how they promote FPICand not even conduct appropriate "consultation" processes for the design oftheir tools to promote safeguards for REDD+. FIP in most of the countrieshave not yet begun - difficult to assess. The agenda for the REDD+partnership is so simple that not sure if you can compare with the others.

Nov 23, 2011 1:48 AM


17/2317 of 23

Page 2, Q7. This question concerns the extent to which the various institutional elements associated withREDD+ act in a transparent manner.

Q7: Do you think the various institutional elements in which you participate are transparent in their dealingswith you regarding the REDD+ process?

What rating w...

1 Dont know Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM2 The leven, of implication in the countries is not the same and some countries

are nor awrae of the transparent way to access to the moneyJan 3, 2012 8:15 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

4 see comment above Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

Page 2, Q8. This question concerns the level of democracy in the various REDD+ processes.

Q8: Do you consider the REDD+ processes in which you participate to act in a democratic manner?


1 Dont know Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

2 I think that it is difficult ta all these processes to be really democratic intheir way of work

Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

4 FIP has not started yet Nov 23, 2011 1:48 AM


18/2318 of 23

Page 2, Q9. This question concerns the making of agreements within REDD+ .

Q9: Do you consider the making of agreements in REDD+ to be effective?


1 The awareness we carry out from anything we gain by contact with any/all ofthese org and their program's is helpful. Our communities. Are veryinterested and responsive to our work in climate change, food security, riskreduction etc. please keep it coming. We are having some effect on theground and welcome any support.

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

2 REDD Dec 21, 2011 12:02 AM

3 I understand the question as being about the making of an agreement andnot about whether the agreement is effective.

Dec 20, 2011 11:13 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

5 Again a tricky question - what are the agreements referred to? If you meanthe process they are all effective i.e. they implement their plans but maybeyou are really asking about efficiency - all need to tighten up.

Dec 16, 2011 7:49 AM

6 Not sure what agreements are meant here. Contracts under the FIP or FCPFare binding and effective; whether they lead to a reduction in emissions is adifferent question. A UNFCCC agreement on REDD facilitates emissionreductions, it does not generate emission reductions per se.

Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

7 UNFCCC REDD+ is eventually compliance based forest carbon in climatechange mitigation.

Nov 22, 2011 6:15 PM

Page 2, Q10. This question concerns the way in which disputes are settled within REDD+.

Q10: Do you consider the settling of disputes in REDD+ to be effective?


1 Have not had experience of this so have chosen the middle option so as notskew results, I would have left it blank but could not complete the survey if Idid, I suggest having a N/A or unsure/unknown category in future surveys.

Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM

2 Don't know and not aware of the internal politics between theseorganisations.

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 The way the disputes are settled could be improved. Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

5 There are no dispute settlement mechanisms dedicated to REDD+. Normallydisputes are settled in negotiations. An additional feature is the InspectionPanel of the WB.

Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM


19/2319 of 23

Page 2, Q10. This question concerns the way in which disputes are settled within REDD+.

Q10: Do you consider the settling of disputes in REDD+ to be effective?


6 REDD+ partnership does not have to deal with disputes on REDD Nov 23, 2011 1:48 AM

Page 2, Q11. This question concerns the degree to which you think REDD+ will contribute to changing thebehaviour that leads to deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries.

Q11: Do you think REDD+ will contribute to changing the behaviour that leads to deforestation and forestdegradation ...

1 My response assumes the many of the current issues are resolved in termsof BDS, monitoring etc, however, issues around high transaction costs, topheavy cost of project implementation etc mean that the likelihood of successremains fairly low.

Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM

2 Nobody is helping us to get through to our own clansmen to stop clearing ourforests or at least to take replanting seriously

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 In general, the contribution of these processes to change the behaviour willbe very low because there no ownership by the key stakeholders.

Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM

4 This will only allow for land grabs as private investors will want to ensurethatthey are compensated for the otherwise loss of forests while indigenouspeoples are still seeking recognition of their traditionally occupied lands andresources.

Dec 21, 2011 8:10 AM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

6 Depends on the national implementation of REDD+. International incentivescan facilitate but not replace national engagement.

Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

7 Behavior changes is most likely if financial incentives will flow to forestadjacent local communities and the indigenous peoples thereby enablingthem to reduce their high dependence on forest resources (providingalternative livelihoods options and building their capacity to manage andutilize available resources on a sustainable basis). This is important withoutpredictable financial flows REDD+ may remain on paper but with little impacton ground and people may not change their behavior.

Nov 20, 2011 3:05 PM


20/2320 of 23

Page 2, Q12. This question concerns the degree to which you think REDD+ will help solve the problem ofdeforestation and forest degradation in developing countries.

Q12: Do you think REDD+ will help solve the problem of deforestation and forest degradation in developingcountries?

What rating would you ...

1 as above Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM2 If education and awareness could come directly to communities rather than

just individual participants returning from distant conferences we might getmore results. Why not partner our orbs to come in teams and work with uson the ground?

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 The contribution of these processes to reduce the deforestation and thedegradation will be very low because the access to the "REDD money " isstill complicated

Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM

4 the different initiatives will help solve the problem but the problem will not be100% solved

Dec 20, 2011 11:13 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

6 UNREDD, FIP and FCPF are changing actual performance - the others arelargely discussion fora. There is a need for exchange of views but I am notsure of the value of a process centered on discussion.

Dec 16, 2011 7:49 AM

7 See comment to question11. Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

8 REDD+ partnership is just a plataform of exchange - not sure if they can becompared to the other mechanisms for this question

Nov 23, 2011 1:48 AM

9 Besides UNFCCC REDD+ others are just for facilitating REDD+ readinessprocess.

Nov 22, 2011 6:15 PM

10 I feel through global REDD+ mechanisms and with clear financial incentivesthe forest dependent communities and the indigenous people will takeappropriate actions to conserve the forests. Currently deforestation andforest degradation are taking their tall because many people in rural areasare poor and have nothing else to make a living or earn some cash exceptrelying heavily on forest resources available within the vicinity. It isanticipated that if viable alternative for livelihoods will be made available tothem it is most likely to see some great changes in the way they use thenatural resources especially the forests and woodlands. We should expectsome positive changes but we need to move fast to make more trees alivethan dead.

Nov 20, 2011 3:05 PM


21/2321 of 23

Page 2, Q13. This question concerns the durability of REDD+.'Durability' here means long-lasting, resilient, flexible and adaptable.

Q13: Do you consider REDD+ will be durable?


1 If a successful REDD+ program is implemented with a market mechanism forfunding linked to carbon trading the market should be self-sustaining. Again,this rests on a large 'if'. At this point the FCPF funding seems to provide onlyminor additional benefit. It is unclear how exactly this mechanism and FIPwill operate.

Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM

2 Hope so Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 In the current design in which drivers have not been sufficiently addressed itis high unlikely.

Jan 14, 2012 1:07 AM

4 It is difficult to know the future of REDD+ processes Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM


Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

6 How should we know at this point? Dec 13, 2011 3:49 AM

7 None Nov 23, 2011 1:10 AM

8 yes it is most likely to be durable as long as financial flows through bilateral,multilateral or carbon trading markets will remain predictable and sustainableand beneficial to the local communities and indigenous peoples.

Nov 20, 2011 3:05 PM


22/2322 of 23


23/23

Page 2, Q14. Is there anything else you would like to say?

1 My experience is largely with the UN-REDD program, UNFCCC and REDD+Partnerships I have heard of but not been involved in. I have spoken with theWorld Bank about FCPF and FIP and feel that these processes also will nothave much relevance from the perspective of a VNGO (as they tend to focuson VN Gov).

Jan 15, 2012 4:51 PM

2 I have tried three times tO complete this survey on line but due to power cutoffs and signal problems have been interrupted and the efforts shut downmid completion. I do not know if you received any partial attempts fromBougainville but we have tried since Nov and do apologise. I am trying thislast effort from the domestic terminal in POM. Hope it gets through. Thanks.

Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM

3 no Jan 4, 2012 7:32 PM

4 I think it will be relvant to waork on the ownership of these processes beforewe go ahead

Jan 3, 2012 8:15 PM

5 Effective coordination of all the mechanisms at both global and nationallevels is key for a full implementation of REDD+ on the ground.

Dec 20, 2011 11:12 PM

6 I am not so much familiar with all mechanism Dec 13, 2011 5:26 PM

7 REDD+ Programmes in developing countries in Africa especially Tanzania tosucceed, there needs to be a community oriented performance basedREDD model that will depend on the government recognizing communityrights to directly access REDD revenues generated from reduceddeforestation on village lands. Prioritizing in the improvement of governanceis a very intergral part of the readiness activitiesof REDD+. Communitiesshould take a lead in advocacting for issues that are pertinen it to theirlivelihoods if given the right package of awareness in the process of makinginformed decisions.

Dec 12, 2011 10:30 PM

8 None Nov 23, 2011 1:10 AM9 All five approach of REDD+ are not equally in operation in the country. So, I

may be biased on which I mostly involving.Nov 22, 2011 6:15 PM

10 UN-REDD- its a good programme if undertaken with inclusion ofgrassroot people

Nov 22, 2011 4:19 PM

11 When the discussions and negotiations on REDD+ plus started in 2007(December in Bali, Indonesia) poor countries like Tanzania had great hopesthat within a near future local communities especially those adjacentcommunities would benefit from forest conservation efforts (result based).This hinged on the fact that some financing was forth coming through

REDD+ however, this high expectation is fading away simply because it istaking long to see some money flowing to the intended beneficiaries. We arenot sure if the global agreement will be reached in Durban, South Africa.Without a solid global agreement we are likely to see REDD+ not an effectivemechanism to help save the forests and other biodiversity resources.

Nov 20, 2011 3:05 PM

fourthredd+surveysummaryresultsnov jan(2012)

Documents