gdr-petitions a sunken treasure for social and historical sciences? · 2013-07-23 · 18.07.2013...
TRANSCRIPT
GDR-Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and Historical Sciences?
Dr. Marian Krawietz Lehrstuhl für Methoden der Empirischen Sozialforschung Komplex 3, Haus 1, Raum 1.23 August-Bebel-Str. 89, 14482 Potsdam E-Mail: [email protected]
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 1
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 2
The contribution is a part of a DFG-project proposal, which Ulrich Kohler and Marian Krawietz are developing at the Chair for Methods in Empirical Sciences in Potsdam. The key question of the contribution is, if GDR-Petitions are a sunken treasure for the Social and Historical Science and if yes, how they can be implemented into nowadays research. 1. Introduction into GDR-Petitions
2. Which research problems could be examined with GDR-Petitions?
3. How to recover petitions` statistics? Introduction to the sample concept. 4. Potential outcomes illustrated via petitions’ statistics of the city county
Potsdam 1969-1989. 5. Summary
Preface
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 3
Every citizen had the right to adress petitions to the representation of the people (Constitution of the GDR, Art. 3. paragraph 4 from 1949).
Petitions were an instrument to apply complaints directly to the administrative level.
Communication via petitions on different levels: citizen state citizen nationally-owned enterprises (VEB) institution institution employee employer
From 1953 the administrative practice was formalized, how administration has to deal with petitions. They included rules how to classify incoming petitions
new statistical source: Petitions‘ Statistics.
1. Framework - Material
1.1. Petitions in the former GDR
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 4
Controversial discussion about function and value of petitions: on the one hand: efficient instrument for informal conflict accomplishment participatory element in the dictatorial GDR system on the other hand: as instrument to ensure nepotistic relationships miserable supstitute for the disestablished administrative tribunals instrument for dictatorship stabilisation
1. Framework - Material
1.2 The qualitative „caliber“ of petitions (I)
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 5
Beyond all dispute
Nearly every second full ager in the GDR wrote one petition in his life time.
petitions are a source of extreme wide range
Petitions are close to real life experience. They express benchmarks of an expected life normality.
petitions as an indicator of life quality
Express a petition can be interpret as an act of „rational choice“ compatibility to actual theoretical approaches
1. Framework - Material
1.2 The qualitative „caliber“ of petitions (II)
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 6
original petitions are mostly deleted (kassiert)
exceptional special stocks (not part of the project) petitions to the secret police (placed in BStU) petitions to the privy council (Staatsraat 1985-1990) petitions to the council of ministers (Ministerrat)
no existing basic population of original petitions, which could be used for a sample concept.
During research, we found the above mentioned interesting source Petitions‘ Statistics.
1. Framework - Material
1.3 Situation in the Archives
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 7
petitions` statistics were a governmental instrument to classify and count incoming petitions
the classification contained e.g.: energy, living conditions, leisure time, environment protection, agriculture, forestry, traffic and news
on the basis of these categories monthly and yearly statistical reports were published for intern purpose on all administrative levels
The original (and mostly deleted) petitions we find today as classified groups in the Petitions‘ Statistics .
Advantageous situation in the archives: Petitions‘ statistics can be found nearly completely in the Eastern German district and/or national archives.
1. Framework - Material
1.4 Petitions‘ Statistics (I)
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 8
less variance then original petitions scientist has to deal with GDR-classifications problem of statistic falsification and data validation extreme administrative effort to collect, classify and „solve“ petitions´
claims proof of data validity approaches to validate data still open
1. Framework - Material
1.4 Petitions‘ Statistics (II) – Qualitative Aspects
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 9
Bis 1968
Ab 1969
1. Framework - Material
1.4 Petitions‘ Statistics (III) – Material
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 10
As regard to research on petitions and petitions’ statistics:
historical contextualization of petitions is widely done contextualisation and reconstruction of petitions` statistics is missing Work with petitions` statistics extends the research field about petitions
As regard to research on life quality in the former GDR:
life quality is an under investigated field of research (Lebensweiseforschung) petitions‘ statistics help to illuminate the GDR-society under life quality aspects
As regard to data: official GDR-statistics offers only partly useful data „heritage“ of GDR Social-Sciences seems hardly useful for representative
research recovering petitions‘ statistics helps to improve the data situation
2. Current state of research 2.1 For which research questions petitions‘ statistics could be usefull?
15 administrative regions split in
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 11
Quelle: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/DDR_Verwaltung2.png, 12.06.13 15:00
city counties rural counties
22 1952 194
23 1953
24 1954
1956 193
23 1957 192
22 1958
23 1961
1965 191
25 1967
26 1969
27 1974
1988 189
26 1990
GDR-Census 1971 und 1981
sample criterias
• density of the counties • age distribution in the
counties • information about the
economical alignment (codification of the occupation)
• region • border-zone areas • urban influence
Sample plan, which defines, which counties will be selected national/district Archives digitalize the data Work in progress …
3. How to make Petitions´ Statistics usable:
3.1. The Polling concept
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 12
50
000
10
000
015
000
0
10
00
20
00
30
00
40
00
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990Jahr
Eingaben insgesamt
Wohnungswesen
Fitted values
Fitted values
Staatsrat Fitted values
Gesamtaufkommen, Wohnungswesen Staatsratseingaben '70-'89
Eingabenaufkommen Rat der Stadt Potsdam
4. Outlock
4.1 Potential Outcomes (I)
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 13
050
10
015
0
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990Jahr
Umweltschutz
Wasserwirtschaft/-schutz
Erholungswesen
Fitted values
Fitted values
Fitted values
Umweltschutz, Wasserwirtschaft/-Schutz, Erholungswesen '70-'89
Eingabenaufkommen Rat der Stadt Potsdam
4. Outlock
4.2 Potential Outcomes
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and
Historical Sciences? 14
Original Petitions not capable Petitions` Statistics seem to be an interesting alternative, because
… they seem good documented/archived … have a systematic format … seems to have a good data validity … can be examined under aspects of rational choice
Problems:
complex and costly sample concept research is “captured” in GDR-Logic hard to deconstruct and contextualize the administrative ratio, in
which petitions` statistic were produced
5. Summary: GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social and Historical Sciences?
18.07.2013 GDR Petitions – A sunken treasure for Social
and Historical Sciences? 15
Thank You
for Your Attention