gemara notes 47
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Gemara Notes p. 47
דף ס עמוד א
![Page 2: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
When a fire goes forth and burnsOne is חייב for…
![Page 3: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
thorns
![Page 4: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
a stack of grain
![Page 5: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
the standing grain
![Page 6: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
the field
![Page 7: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
If one lit a fire that consumed the wood, stones or earth
of another, he is חייב.
This is learned from the פסוק:
י �ש כ א א! צ! יםת! �צ אה ק& צ( לומ* כ. א0 נ1 יש ו( �ד או ג*
ה מ* ק* ה ה. ד1 ש* תאו ה. ר א1 �ע ב( מ. ם ה. ל! ש. ם י( ל! ש.
ה ר* ע! ב( :ה.If a fire goes out and finds thorns, and a stack of grain
or the standing grain or the field is consumed, the one
who lit the fire must pay
![Page 8: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Why did the Torah need to write four examples?What is the purpose of each term?
![Page 9: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
If the פסוק would have written only:
If a fire goes out and finds thorns, he is חייב
I would have thought… he would only be חייב for thorns because they are usually burned and he probably wasn't careful about them, but if a stack of grain burned, I would have thought he is פטור because it must have been an אונס
![Page 10: Gemara Notes 47](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082416/559287c91a28ab4e468b46fa/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
If the פסוק would have written only:
If a fire goes out and finds the stack of grain, he is חייב
I would have thought… he would only be חייב for the stack because it is a substantial loss, but if thorns are burned, I would have thought he is פטור because the loss is minimal