gm jan mac2010

PP16376/08/2010(025385) For Internal Circulation Only 只供內部傳閱 Jan- Mac 2010 Vol 1

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE PARTY

Re-strategisingRRReeee-s-s-sttttttrraaaaateteteteteteggiiissssiiinnnnngggggggggRe-strategisingPg5

Pg8

Pg10

Pg14

熱門話題：民聯好戲陸續來?

Hot topics : What’s next?

特別報導：鄧章耀戳破民聯謊言！

Special Report : Chang Yeow takes on Liew

G 聚焦：津貼：給或不給？

G- Focus : Subsidy: Yes Or No?

新思潮：重布棋局放眼未來

New Thoughts : Re-strategising for the future

cover02.indd 1 4/21/2010 12:57:18 AM

282726

030405081012141718202224

Gerakan Matters 民意 2

“Gerakan Matters” would like to invite members to send in your views. Please send your feedbacks to [email protected]《民意》欢迎任何意见或投

稿，请电邮或致函至《民意》联络处。

Editorial B

oard编

辑部

Publicity, Information & Communication Bureau Chairman宣传、资讯及通讯局主任

Teng Chang Yeow 邓章耀

Editor-in-Chief总编辑

Khaw Veon Szu 许文思

Editor主编

Neoh Ghee Yea 梁仪雅

Asst. Editor副主编

Anthony Chew 周福寿

Chan Yoke Lin 陈奕莲

Sub Editor助编

Poh Ai Leng 蒲爱玲

How Han Kee 侯涵琪

Melvin Chin Wee Loon 陈伟伦

Layout & Design美术编辑

Dragon Tan 陈龙

Disclaimer 负责声明

The publisher, PGRM, and its editors cannot be held responsible for any errors and consequences arising from the use of information contained in this magazine.

负责声明：马来西亚民政运动(PGRM)不为本刊内容的准确性

和完整性承担任何保证责任。

Contact 联络处

Contents

目錄

Foreword: A Note from the Vice President of Gerakan副主席的话

Selected Statements精选文告

Hot Topic热门话题

Special Report特别报导

G-FocusG聚焦

Face to Face领袖专访

New Thoughts新思潮

Column & Blog我们的声音

States’ Highlights“州”记

Activities活动报报看

Pemuda新生代空间

G-saysG主张

HQ Staff Lineup总部职员阵容

Representatives in Government 国州政府党代表阵容

Ideology理念

Add: Level 5, Tower 1, Menara PGRM, No 6 & 8, Jalan Pudu Ulu, Cheras 56100 Kuala Lumpur Tel: 03-9287 6868 Fax: 03-9287 8866

www.gerakan.org.my

http://twitter.com/gerakanmalaysia

http://tinyurl.com/yfxpkf4http://tinyurl.com/ykpp97p

Published by: Parti Gerakan Rakyat MalaysiaLevel 5, Tower 1, Menara PGRM, No 6 & 8, Jalan Pudu Ulu, Cheras 56100 Kuala Lumpur

Printed by: SWAN Printing Sdn BhdLot 5249, Jalan BS7/1, Kawasan Perindustrian Bukit Serdang, 43300 Seri Kembangan, Selangor.

atter02.indd 1 4/21/2010 1:05:29 AM


副主席的話Foreword: A Note from the Vice President of Gerakan

P a r t i G e r a k a n Ra kya t Ma l ays i a (PGRM) began as an opposition party.

As a par ty tha t a d v o c a t e s a n d c h a m p i o n s f o r a multi-ethnic society, P G R M w o n t h e support and trust of the people during the General Elections i n 1 9 6 9 w i t h a handsome majority

which enabled the party to form the Penang State Government.

It was not at all easy for Parti Gerakan which has won the Penang State Government in the midst of poli t ical instabil i ty and economic recession to govern and lead the state. PGRM faced a lot of challenges in its effort to improve the livelihood of the people who were severely affected by the political instability and economic recession.

The founding leaders in Parti Gerakan realised that in order to transform Penang from a fishing village to a modern city, it cannot work alone, but have to work hand in hand with the Federal Government which has the resources to help to spearhead Penang’s economy. Thus, PGRM allied itself with other political parties to form the National Front in 1974.

Thereafter, the Gerakan-led Penang State Government under Chief Minister Dr (now Tun) Lim Chong Eu together with the Federal Government embarked on a visionary policy

and strategic plan to develop Penang from a sleepy hollow into the country’s pioneer first industrialised state which eventually became well-known as the Silicon Valley of the East. When Dr (now Tan Sri) Koh Tsu Koon took over the reign of Penang two (2) decades later, he continued to lead and develop Penang ever more aggressively with the state recording high growth rates even during recessionary years.

However, at the same time when the party’s focus on economic development in the State of Penang, in specific, and in the country, in general, was very successful, Parti Gerakan suffered a severe setback in its political achievements. Having focused all its time, energy and effort in developing the state and the country, the party has neglected its very own political survival. Over the last three (3) decades, its political independence in the National Front was slowly eroding away, while its multi-racial ideology within its own party was almost lost.

With little political independence left, the party finds it an uphill task indeed to influence other race base component parties in the coalition to practise politics which is more encompassing for the benefit of all Malaysians regardless of race, religion and creed. This is made worst by the fact that the main component party in the National Front is becoming more and more arrogant and abusive.

Hence, inspite of the strong foundation laid for the robust development of Penang and the overall significant improvements in the livelihood of its people as well as all the hard

work being put in to continuously improve, enhance and upgrade the economic, social, safety, educational, cultural aspects of Penang, Parti Gerakan was completely wiped out of Penang in the General Elections in March 2008.

Nevertheless, despite of its complete lost in

Penang and some losses in other states, Parti Gerakan is not giving up and is continuing, in fact, stepping up its efforts to encourage its colleagues in the National Front to join forces with the party to build a better Malaysia for all and not just a selected few.

Parti Gerakan will, without fear or favour, fight vehemently against the politics of racism and religious extremism. It is committed to s t r i ve on to promote and ach ieve understanding and harmony in our multi-racial country which belongs to all of us.

At this most difficult time, we must have the utmost commitment, dedication, devotion and determination to advocate and champion for multi-racial politics for a multi-racial Malaysia. Now is the best time for us to revisit the founding spirit of the party and to reinforce ourselves with the founding ideologies and building a healthy and progressive political environment for the nation.

I therefore strongly urge our members to stay on the course, to be focused and not to be swayed. I believe that this difficult and challenging period in the political struggle and survival of our party may be our best opportunity yet to rebuild and map out the future direction and course of our party to be even more relevant than before and now.

Seeing light in the tunnelNational Vice President Sdr Teng Hock Nan

民政黨是從一個不折不扣的反對黨起

家。身為一個標榜著多元種族的鬥爭精神

和目標的政黨，民政黨在1969年的全國

大選中，獲得人民的支持和信任，贏取多

數的州議席，成立檳州政府。

民政黨在檳州執政的初期，面對了州內

很多的民生問題、政局的動蕩和經濟不景

的嚴竣考驗。面對以上的棘手問題，為了

使檳州人民能擺脫這些生活上的壓力，並

把檳城從一個漁村轉型為現代化的城市，

民政黨於1974年和其他政黨聯盟，組織

國陣，通過國陣向聯邦政府尋求資源協

助。

成為國陣的一分子的這30多年裡，無可

否認的，在民政黨為骨幹的檳州政府，以

計劃和前瞻性的管理下，再加上聯邦政府

的全力配合和支持，檳州在林蒼佑醫生同

志和許子根博士同志的領導下，成功為檳

州帶來具歷史意義的經濟轉型、人文發展

和社會穩定。

然而，在這些驕人的政績裡，成為國陣

一分子的民政黨，似乎在一定的程度上，

漸漸的被視為失去了她的獨立和多元種族

的特色。在一個以單元種族為根基的政黨

為主的國陣大家庭裡，這些年以來，民政

黨面對著相對艱辛的政治任務和考驗，尤

其在於如何有效的影響友黨，以超越種族

為考量的思維來推動國家的建設和人文的

發展。

308的政治海嘯，是民政黨創黨以來，

所面對到的最嚴重的打擊。在這個艱難的

時刻，正是時候讓民政黨果敢的以堅定的

意志來推動多元種族政治。這也是一個絕

佳的時機，讓我們能更深刻的意識到回歸

到創黨精神、加強黨員對黨的理念認同和

推動健康政治文化的必要。

民政黨必須大膽打擊種族和宗教極端主

義的抬頭，並積極促使溫和和中庸的多元

種族主義得以鞏固，那麼，一個馬來西亞

的歡融和公平合理的社會才能夠實現。

只要我們秉承“在哪裡跌倒，便從哪裡

爬起來＂的精神，逆機便是契機！

絕處逢生

全國副主席丁福南醫生

mattr3.indd 1 4/21/2010 1:38:38 AM


精選文告Selected Statements

Timbalan Presiden Gerakan Datuk Chang Ko Youn mengutuk kenyataan “perkauman” yang dikeluarkan oleh Nasir Safar dan menegaskan bahawa beliau harus meminta maaf kepada seluruh rakyat Malaysia.

“Walaupun beliau telah berundur dari jawatan beliau, tetapi sebagai pegawai khas kepada Perdana Menteri, Nasir juga perlu meminta maaf kepada rakyat umum. Apa yang diperkatakan oleh beliau adalah tidak bertanggungjawab, boleh memecahbelahkan perpaduan kaum, bersifat jahil dan menjijikkan serta bertentangan dengan semangat 1Malaysia yang digagaskan oleh Perdana Menteri.”

Chang berkata kenyataan Nasir yang berbau “perkauman” bukan sahaja mencabar semangat 1Malaysia yang digagaskan oleh Perdana Menteri, bahkan juga mengejutkan seluruh negara, khususnya ketika perpaduan dan keharmonian kaum sedang menghadapi ujian getir yang paling mencabar.

Beliau berkata akhir-akhir ini, beberapa insiden di dalam negara boleh menyebabkan rakyat hilang kewarnaan dan menjurus kepada tindakan yang tidak rasional.

Chang berkata rakyat kini bercakap mengenai ketidakadilan dan golongan tertentu boleh digesa untuk menyelurkan kenyataan atau melakukan sesuatu yang bodoh, sekaligus menjejas ketenteraman dan kesepakatan.

“Set iap rakyat harus bertenang, berfikiran rasional, berwaspada dan jangan terperangkap oleh golongan yang tidak berprinsip yang mengambil kesempatan untuk mencapai objektif politik mereka.”

“Gerakan memuji Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak mengambil t i ndakan pan tas l ag i t epa t un tuk melucutkan jawatan Nasir. Pegawai seumpama Nasir tidak harus berada dalam perkhidmatan awam 1Malaysia. Ini menunjukkan Najib bersikap serius dalam menangani isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan keharmonian kaum.”

Nasir harus meminta maaf kepada semua rakyat Malaysia, Gerakan

¿º¢÷ «¨ÉòÐ Á§Äº¢Â÷¸Ç¢¼õ ÁýÉ¢ôÒ §¸ð¸§ÅñÎõ - ¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý

¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ ¼ò§¾¡ º¡í §¸¡ ÔùÉ¢ý Àò¾¢Ã¢¨¸ «È¢ì¨¸

À¢ôÃÅÃ¢ 3, 2010

¿º¢Ã¢ý «Åº¢ÂÁüÈ «È¢ì¨¸ ÌÈ¢òÐ ¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý ¸ðº¢Â¢ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ ¼ò§¾¡ º¡í

§¸¡ Ôùý º¡ÊÉ¡÷. «¨ÉòÐ Á§Äº¢Â÷¸Ç¢¼õ «Å÷ ÁýÉ¢ôÒ §¸ð¸§ÅñÎõ ±ýÚ

¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ §¸ðÎì¦¸¡ñ¼¡÷.

“¿º¢÷ Ã¡ƒ¢É¡Á¡ ¦ºö¾¢Õó¾¡Öõ, À¢Ã¾ÁÃ¢ý º¢ÈôÒ «¾¢¸¡Ã¢ ±ýÈ Ó¨ÈÂ¢ø «Å÷

À¸¢Ãí¸ ÁýÉ¢ôÒ §¸ð¸§ÅñÎõ. «Å÷ ÜÈ¢Â Å¡÷ò¨¾¸û ¦À¡ÚôÀüÈ ´ýÚ.

À¢Ã¢Å¢¨É¨ÂÔõ ¦ÅÚôÒ½÷¨ÅÔõ ²üÀÎò¾ìÜÊÂ¨Å. À¢Ã¾ÁÃ¢ý ´§Ã Á§Äº¢Â¡

¯½÷¨Å «Å÷ «ôÀð¼Á¡¸ Á£Ú¸¢È¡÷.”

¿º¢Ã¢ý ÁÉ¨¾ ¸¡ÂôÀÎòÐõ þÉÅ¡¾Á¡É ÜüÚ À¢Ã¾ÁÃ¢ý 1 Á§Äº¢Â¡ ¯½÷×ìÌ

ºÅ¡¨Ä ²üÀÎò¾¢ÔûÇÐ. «§¾¡Î ¿¡ðÊø «¾¢÷îº¢¨Â ²üÀÎò¾¢ÔûÇÐ. ¿ÁÐ

´üÚ¨ÁÔõ þÉ þ½ì¸Óõ ÀÄò¾ ÀÃ¢§º¡¾¨ÉìÌ ¯ðÀðÎûÇ þì¸¡Äì¸ð¼ò¾¢ø þó¿¢¨Ä

²üÀðÎûÇÐ.

¿¡ðÊý «ñ¨ÁÂ ºõÀÅí¸û Áì¸û ¾í¸Ç¢ý ¿¢¾¡Éò¨¾ þÆóÐ ¬§Åºõ

¦¸¡ûÇ ¨ÅòÐÅ¢Îõ. Áì¸û ¸ðÎÀ¡ð¨¼ «Åº¢Âõ ¸¨¼ôÀ¢Êì¸§ÅñÎõ. ¾í¸Ç¢ý

¦º¡øÄ¢Öõ ¦ºÂÄ¢Öõ ¸ñ½¢Âõ ¸¡ì¸§ÅñÎõ ±ýÚ ¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ ¼ò§¾¡

º¡í §¸¡ Ôùý ÅÄ¢ÔÚò¾¢É¡÷.

Áì¸û ºÃ¢Â¡¸§Å¡ «øÄÐ ¾ÅÈ¡¸§Å¡ «¿£¾¢¨Â ÀüÈ¢ §ÀÍÅ÷. ¾ÅÈ¡¸

ÅÆ¢¿¼ò¾ôÀð¼Å÷¸û ã¼ò¾ÉÁ¡¸ §Àº§Å¡ «øÄÐ ¿¼ì¸§Å¡ ÓüÀÎÅ÷. þ¾É¡ø

´üÚ¨ÁÔõ «¨Á¾¢Ôõ º£÷Ì¨Ä¸¢ÈÐ ±ýÚ ¼ò§¾¡ º¡í ¦¾Ã¢Å¢ò¾¡÷.

´ù¦Å¡ÕÅÕõ «Åº¢Âõ «¨Á¾¢Â¡¸ þÕì¸§ÅñÎõ. ºÃ¢Â¡É ÁÉ¿¢¨ÄÂ¢ø ¸ÅÉÁ¡¸

¦ºÂøÀ¼§ÅñÎõ. ¾í¸Ç¢ý «Ãº¢Âø §¿¡ì¸í¸¨Ç º¡¾¢ìÌõ Å¨¸Â¢ø ¿¢¨Ä¨Á¨Â

¾í¸ÙìÌ º¡¾¸Á¡ì¸¢¦¸¡ûÇ Å¢ÕõÒõ ¿ÂÅïº¸ÁüÈÅ÷¸Ç¢ý Å¨ÄÂ¢ø

Å¢ØóÐÅ¢¼ìÜ¼¡Ð.

¿º¢¨Ã ¾ÉÐ À¾Å¢Â¢Ä¢ÕóÐ «¸üÚÅ¾üÌ ÐÃ¢¾Á¡É ¾¢ð¼Åð¼Á¡É ¿¼ÅÊì¨¸ ±Îò¾

À¢Ã¾Á÷ ¼ò§¾¡ ƒ ¿ƒ£ô Ðý Ãº¡ì¨¸ ¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý À¡Ã¡ðÎ¸¢ÈÐ. ¿ƒ£ôÀ¢ý 1 Á§Äº¢Â¡

«ÃÍ §º¨ÅÂ¢ø ¿º¢÷ §À¡ýÈ «¾¢¸¡Ã¢¸ÙìÌ þ¼Á¢ø¨Ä. þó¾ ÓÊ× ¿ƒ£ôÀ¢ý 1

Á§Äº¢Â¡ «ÏÌÓ¨ÈìÌ ²üÈ ´ýÚ. þÉ þ½ì¸õ ¦¾¡¼÷À¢Ä¡É Å¢Å¸¡Ãí¸ÙìÌ

¾£÷× ¸¡ñÀ¾¢ø ¿ƒ£ô Á¢¸×õ ¾¢¼Á¡¸ þÕì¸¢È¡÷ ±ýÀ¾¨ÉÔõ þÐ ±ÎòÐì¸¡ðÎ¸¢ÈÐ.



À¢ôÃÅÃ¢ 3, 2010



¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ §¸ðÎì¦¸¡ñ¼¡÷.




¯½÷¨Å «Å÷ «ôÀð¼Á¡¸ Á£Ú¸¢È¡÷.”




²üÀðÎûÇÐ.



















À¢ôÃÅÃ¢ 3, 2010



¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ §¸ðÎì¦¸¡ñ¼¡÷.




¯½÷¨Å «Å÷ «ôÀð¼Á¡¸ Á£Ú¸¢È¡÷.”




²üÀðÎûÇÐ.



















À¢ôÃÅÃ¢ 3, 2010



¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý Ð¨½ò¾¨ÄÅ÷ §¸ðÎì¦¸¡ñ¼¡÷.




¯½÷¨Å «Å÷ «ôÀð¼Á¡¸ Á£Ú¸¢È¡÷.”




²üÀðÎûÇÐ.

















Kenyataan akhbar oleh Timbalan Presiden Gerakan Datuk Chang Ko Youn Feb 3, 2010


熱門話題Hot Topic

It is no secret that the cooperation of DAP-PKR-PAS, in short PR, is based on marriage of convenience and they are united by their hatred against BN.

There is no love among the 3 partners who are exploiting

each other’s strength and the bandage is not permanent as their ideological differences and goals are world apart.It does not come as a surprise when the crack appears in PKR first which plays the role of middleman linking DAP and PAS together. PKR members are a mixture of all kinds; they are ex-UMNO, MCA, GERAKAN, MIC.

DAP members or anyone who can’t get along in their parties can

opt to join PKR to further their political agenda and objectives. With these complicated and divergent members having different

political objectives and beliefs the leadership of PKR can’t formulate a common stand on many national issues.

On the contrary, PKR has been opportunistic and exploitative seizing on any issue that will damage the image and credibility of BN.But, some members can’t tolerate Anwar’stactic and gimmick and he is seen as pandering to DAP and PAS for his ultimate ambition to be the Prime Minister of Malaysia at all cost.

Its members feel that the party is being turned into a machinery to serve

the interest and objective of one person only at the expense of party’s unity, future and ideology if there is any.

Thus, you can see its members are deserting PKR one by one as there

is nothing to cement them together ideologically. They leave on different grounds as we have seen the reasons advanced by the independent MPs.Some are upset by Anwar’s submission to DAP’s will and some are disgusted by his stance on the usage of “Allah’ and the position of the Malays rightly or wrongly. That only goes to prove their lack of cohesion and understanding which inchoate policy will certainly break up PR eventually.

槟州联委会主席丁福南同志

槟州民联成员党上演的“闹剧＂只属“冰山一角＂。这也显示民联各成员党已有了“裂痕＂，这情况与民联在2008年执政槟州后，行动党和公正党领导层之间出现严重分裂如出一辙。他们的结盟只是一个为了各自利益而达成，主要为迎合党领袖的政治目的，而非是为了党或人民的利益。

人民會從峇央峇鲁国会议员拿督斯里再林公开攻击槟州首长林冠英霸权的事項上看穿他们的真面目。

槟城政府是“一人政府＂是众所周知的事，表面上，这机构推崇了CAT宗旨，但事实上它却推行另一个CAT即抱怨，责难和扭曲政策，是个独裁和专制的管理方式。

为了槟城和人民的利益，槟州“一人政府＂应该诚实及具有信用，为槟州争取更多的投资和发展，而不是为了赢取人民的支持，而喊出空洞的口号，或成立一些没有功能的行政理事会或委员会。

PKR is in a mess, as its leaders, notably MPs and State Assemblymen, start to quit from the party, one by one.

The party is embroiled with internal strife, bickering and accusations of “little Napoleons” controlling the party and wanting to get rid of leaders who are not in their good books.

So far, seven leaders have left. According to them, more leaders will

be leaving PKR.

What’s next?

It is no secret that the cooperation of DAP-PKR-PAS, in short PR, is based on marriage of convenience and they are

There is no love among the 3 partners who are exploiting each other’s strength and the bandage is not permanent as their ideological differences and goals are world apart.It does not come as a surprise when the crack appears in PKR first which plays the role of middleman linking DAP and PAS together. PKR members are a mixture of all kinds; they are ex-UMNO, MCA,

DAP members or anyone who can’t get along in their parties can opt to join PKR to further their political agenda and objectives.

With these complicated and divergent members having different political objectives and beliefs the leadership of PKR can’t formulate a

On the contrary, PKR has been opportunistic and exploitative seizing on any issue that will damage the image and credibility of BN.But, some

PKR is in a mess, as its leaders, notably MPs and State Assemblymen, start to quit from the party, one by one.

The party is embroiled with internal strife, bickering and accusations of “little Napoleons” controlling the party and wanting to get rid of leaders who are not in their good books.

So far, seven leaders have left. According to them, more leaders will be leaving PKR.

What’s next?

Penang Gerakan chairman Sdr Teng Hock Nan

The row within Pakatan Rakyat in Penang is “a tip of the iceberg. There are signs of the coalition “cracking”. The simmering feud between DAP and PKR leaders has been existing since they formed the state government after the general elections in 2008.

Their coalition is a marriage of convenience to suit the

purposes of their leaders and not of the party let alone the people.

The public attacks by Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Hashim against Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng are showing their true colours.

It is common knowledge that the Penang government is

a one-man government which ostensibly promotes “CAT” (complaining, accusing and twisting) in a dictatorial and autocratic way.

For the sake of the people and Penang, the state one-

man government should sincerely and truthfully get more investments & developments, instead of banking on hollow slogans, forming unproductive committees or councils and playing on the sentiments of the people.

Perak Gerakan chairman Sdr Chang Ko Youn

霹雳州联委会主席郑可扬同志

行动党、公正党及回教党之间是因为利益而结合关系早已不是秘密。在民联的合作关系里，他们是因对国阵的憎恨而结合的乌合之众。3党之间并没有真诚的关系存在，他们的结合只是互相利用。他们之间缺乏共同的政治理念和目标，因此这种因利益而结合的关系并不会长久。

所以我对公正党目前发生的内讧一点都不惊讶，因为公正党一开始也仅是扮演“拉线人＂的角色，充当行动党与回教党的中间人；而且公正党的党员不少也是前巫统、马华、民政党及国大党的成员。

民主行动党党员或任何人，只要无法继续与原生党共进退，都可以加入公正党来继续自己的政治议程及目的。

公正党党员政治背景复杂，他们没有共同的政治目标，导致领导层无法

在全国课题上拥有鲜明的立场。相反的，公正党也可利用这些模糊的立场，在许多课题上断章取义，以图破坏国阵的形象和名誉。可是，公正党有部分党员，却无法忍受安华不惜一切迎合行动党及回教党的手段和政治花招，以促成他当我国首相的野心。

这些不满的党员感觉到，安华正在牺牲党的团结、未来和理想的机制，

只是为了成全他一个人的政治意图和目标。因此，您可以看到，该党许多党员因无法认同党作法而一个个的离开。他们以不同理由离开，不过，我们已经从独立国会议员的身上看到了有关的原由。

有些人不满安华对行动党的屈服，有些是因为公正党对“阿拉＂和马来

人的课题没有鲜明的立场，而产生反感。这些都只能证明，公正党并没有凝聚力，也缺乏团结和谅解的方针，所以最终导致内部出现分裂。

公正黨最新一輪的退黨風自去年10月29日掀起，繼巴生港口州議員巴魯希山退黨並宣佈成為獨立議員後，該黨陸續又有7名具影響力的領袖退出。據這些退黨領袖，這股退黨風還會持續下去，未來會有更多議員或領袖退出公正黨。

這些議員及領袖退黨的理由綜合起來只有兩個：1)不滿檳州首席部長過於霸權及獨裁；2)不滿公正黨在阿拉課題上的立場與表現。

民聯好戲陸續來？

mattr5.indd 1 4/21/2010 1:42:32 AM


熱門話題Hot Topic

兩大導火線，公正黨！PKR’s mess, leaders quitting!

“我出任副首長職時常被一些人攻擊，他們對這職位虎視眈眈。公正黨給我很大壓力，至於安華在逼我辭職時所做的承諾，現在已不重要了，我退黨是因為我堅持原則。” (摘自:星洲日报，28/2/2010)

“916變天计划失败已动摇我的决心，308的胜利並没用在回教徒、人民与宗教的斗争上，反而成为政治斗争的场域。内斗愈演愈烈，使我這名受“阿拉”委托的国会议员，无法完成己任。我雖曾向党内反映意见，惟却不见任何回应与改变。”（摘自：独立新闻在线，3/3/2010）

Bagan Serai MP Mohsin Fadzli Samsuri霹雳峇眼色海国会议员慕辛法兹利

Quit Date/退党日期: 3/3/2010

Reason/退党原因

1)Disappointed with Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) handling of issues, especially over the use of word “Allah”.2)Has not been able to perform his duties well due to sabotage and internal problems in the party. 1)无法忍受民聯的作法如一再攻击国家体制如君主立宪、司法制度及当权者的行為，甚至允准让‘阿拉’成为多神崇拜字眼。2)对公正党的斗争方向与理念失去信心，因该党已乖离原有的斗争路线。

“The trust and confi dence that I have placed in PKR’s and Pakatan Rakyat’s struggle especially in restoring the special position of Islam has faded with the latest development in the party. I have raised these issues and questions through internal party channels, but no action or positive step was taken.”(Source: Malaysianinsider,3/3/2010)

Former Penang Deputy Chief Minister I Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin槟州前第一副首长法鲁斯


Reason/退党原因

1)Forced to quit DPM post by PKR.2)PKR failed to make a good stand on Allah issue and to defend the party’s political power in Penang.3)Disappointed with Penang government’s performance.

Bayan Baru MP Zahrain Hashim峇央峇魯区国会议员再林

Quit Date/退党日期:12/2/2010

Reason/退党原因

1)Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng is “chauvinistic, arrogant and communistic.” 2)Disappointed with Lim’s administrative-style. Disillusioned with PKR and Pakatan Rakyat.

1)不滿林冠英的“獨裁、沙文主義及共產黨思想。＂2)对公正党乖离创党目标感到失望。

“Pakatan will not last long. It is people like Lim Guan Eng who will destroy Pakatan Rakyat. Today’s PKR and Pakatan Rakyat are a far cry from practicing the pure struggle of ‘reformasi’ which de facto PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim, himself a friend of 30 years, invited me to join.”(Source: Malaysiakini, 12 Feb 2010)

1)不滿公正黨在辭第一首長職事項上對他“逼宮” 。2)对公正党在“阿拉”课题上的立场感到失望。3)檳州政府的言論和表現令人失望，違反他的參政原則。

“I have been monitoring every article, announcement, and press statements on Allah issue.”“I am very saddened by the stand taken by Pakatan Rakyat leaders which is very loose, in that they cannot even defend something so basic. And that broke my patience.” (Source: The star, 28/2/2010)

MohammadFairus Khairuddin法鲁斯

Badrul Hisham Abdullah巴鲁希山

Kedah state assemblyperson Tan Wei Shu announced his resignation from PKR at a press conference in Kuala Lumpur.

The Bakar Arang representative is the latest in a series elected representatives to have quit PKR since February.

He is also the second Kedah PKR state assemblyperson to defect, since Lunas assemblyperson Muhammad Radzhi Salleh defected last year in the run-up to the Permatang Pasir by-election.

(Source: Malaysiakini, 15/4/2010)

前吉打州行政议员兼峇甲亚兰区州议员陈暐树于2010年4月15日宣布退党。他声称，本身是因

为不满被党领袖所耍弄，才宣布退党。

陈暐树是因为在3月的吉打州民联州行政议会改组中被除名，而心生不满。他原本在州行政议

会中掌管华人、环境及交通事务，并由公正党西塘区州议员陈楚江所取代。

陈暐树也是至今第二位退党的公正党吉打州议员，鲁乃州议员莫哈末拉兹早前在槟州峇东巴

西州席补选时，也突然宣布退党，成为支持首相纳吉的独立议员。

(摘自：当今大马，15/4/2010)

Latest Update!

最新消息

Salehuddin Hashim沙拉胡丁

6-7.indd 2 4/21/2010 10:53:17 AM

兩大導火線，公正黨！PKR’s mess, leaders quitting!

“自大選執政以來，林冠英傲慢無禮的態度，簡直把檳州公正黨華裔議員當狗看待，並經常把小事政治化，而且不接受他人的批評，企圖將檳州政府成為他個人的政府。我看不到黨領導層對解決黨內問題的決心及毅力。為了達到“布城＂目標，安華會不惜代價，包括犧牲黨和黨員的尊嚴。＂(摘自：星洲日报，31/1/2010)

Nibong Tebal MP Tan Tee Beng 高渊区国会议员陈智铭


Reason/退党原因

1) Condemns Penang Chief Minister’s problematic leadership. 2)Anwar ignoring PKR’s internal problems because Anwar is obsessed with taking over Putrajaya.

1)不满林冠英傲慢無礼、独裁、政治化所有课题、把槟州公正党的华裔议员当狗看、企图將槟州政府成為他个人的政府。2)不满安华为了达致个人的布城目标而牺牲公正党和党员。

“I failed to see Anwar acting to rectify the situation. Instead, Anwar is obsessed with taking over Putrajaya. The personal attacks on me are an attempt to divert attention from the real problems in Penang, which is (chief minister) Lim Guan Eng’s problematic leadership. He wants to turn the Penang government into his family business.”(Source: Malaysiakini, 1 March 2010)

“916變天计划失败已动摇我的决心，308的胜利並没用在回教徒、人民与宗教的斗争上，反而成为政治斗争的场域。内斗愈演愈烈，使我這名受“阿拉”委托的国会议员，无法完成己任。我雖曾向党内反映意见，惟却不见任何回应与改变。”（摘自：独立新闻在线，3/3/2010）

1)Disappointed with Pakatan Rakyat’s (PR) handling of issues, especially over the use of word “Allah”.2)Has not been able to perform his duties well due to sabotage and internal problems in the party. 1)无法忍受民聯的作法如一再攻击国家体制如君主立宪、司法制度及当权者的行為，甚至允准让‘阿拉’成为多神崇拜字眼。2)对公正党的斗争方向与理念失去信心，因该党已乖离原有的斗争路线。

“The trust and confidence that I have placed in PKR’s and Pakatan Rakyat’s struggle especially in restoring the special position of Islam has faded with the latest development in the party. I have raised these issues and questions through internal party channels, but no action or positive step was taken.”(Source: Malaysianinsider,3/3/2010)

“我是为党讲话，如果受到对付是残忍的，而公正党也不再公正了。林冠英不喜欢被批评，并将我們标签成国阵代理人。我本身不要攻击行动党，只觉得林冠英若依然故我，必成拖累民联的包袱。＂ (摘自：新闻独立在线，12/2/2010)

Bayan Baru MP Zahrain Hashim峇央峇魯区国会议员再林

Quit Date/退党日期:12/2/2010

Reason/退党原因

1)Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng is “chauvinistic, arrogant and communistic.” 2)Disappointed with Lim’s administrative-style. Disillusioned with PKR and Pakatan Rakyat.

1)不滿林冠英的“獨裁、沙文主義及共產黨思想。＂2)对公正党乖离创党目标感到失望。

“Pakatan will not last long. It is people like Lim Guan Eng who will destroy Pakatan Rakyat. Today’s PKR and Pakatan Rakyat are a far cry from practicing the pure struggle of ‘reformasi’ which de facto PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim, himself a friend of 30 years, invited me to join.”(Source: Malaysiakini, 12 Feb 2010)

“对公正党领导层我已失去信任，所以我选择退党。我是民选议员，不会遵从雪州大臣卡立的要求辞职。”（摘自：光华日报，29/10/2010）

Port Klang assemblyman Badrul Hisham Abdullah巴生港口州议员巴鲁希山


Reason/退党原因

1)Certain party leaders wanted him to quit his state seat. 2)Lost faith in the leadership of Selangor MB Khalid Ramli and PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

1)公正党一些领袖要他辞去州议席一职。2)对公正党领袖失去信心

“I will not resign as assemblyman; I was elected by the people and not appointed by the Mentri Besar of Selangor.”“Since March 2008, allocations to my constituency were channeled to the Mentri Besar’s political secretary Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad who had set up a service centre in Port Klang.” (Source: The Star, 29 Oct 2009)

Tan Tee Beng陈智铭

MohsinFadzli Samsuri慕辛法兹利

Zahrain Hashim再林

Kedah state assemblyperson Tan Wei Shu announced his resignation from PKR at a press conference in Kuala Lumpur.

The Bakar Arang representative is the latest in a series elected representatives to have quit PKR since February.

He is also the second Kedah PKR state assemblyperson to defect, since Lunas assemblyperson Muhammad Radzhi Salleh defected last year in the run-up to the Permatang Pasir by-election.

(Source: Malaysiakini, 15/4/2010)

前吉打州行政议员兼峇甲亚兰区州议员陈暐树于2010年4月15日宣布退党。他声称，本身是因

为不满被党领袖所耍弄，才宣布退党。

陈暐树是因为在3月的吉打州民联州行政议会改组中被除名，而心生不满。他原本在州行政议

会中掌管华人、环境及交通事务，并由公正党西塘区州议员陈楚江所取代。

陈暐树也是至今第二位退党的公正党吉打州议员，鲁乃州议员莫哈末拉兹早前在槟州峇东巴

西州席补选时，也突然宣布退党，成为支持首相纳吉的独立议员。

(摘自：当今大马，15/4/2010)

“公正党最后只会剩下“企图骑劫党＂的人，即社会主义、信仰自由主义的非政府组织者以及朋党。不要以为退党者都没有｀烈火莫熄＇精神，现在大聲談人权和民主的人，在1999年时他们在哪里？＂ (摘自：当今大马，1/3/2010)

Former PKR secretary-general Datuk Salehuddin Hashim公正党前总秘书沙拉胡丁


Reason/退党原因

1)PKR has been hijacked by certain groups of members.

1)公正党已经被社会主义者、信仰自由主义的非政府组织者以及朋党所骑劫。

“There will be allegations that those who left the party are imperfections, as if those who remain in the party are perfect specimen of human beings. This is not a party for one or two people, not a private limited company or a family party.” (Source: The Malaysian Insider, 3 March 2010)

地震大


高渊区国会议员陈智铭

6-7.indd 3 4/21/2010 1:52:43 AM


uncivilized political culture

特別報導Special Report

总秘书邓章耀同志大爆料，在3月13日的“非谈不可：KPI大比拼－变天2周

年，槟城越变越好？＂政治辩论会上，以3大实例逐一的戳破槟州民联政府的

政治谎言！

当晚邓章耀同志以“一夫当关之势＂，面对主持人、点评人及对手的唇枪

舌战攻击之际，邓同志仍沉住情绪，逐一作出反击，力数民联不是。

大爆料：木蔻山宪报遥遥无期槟州政府迟迟未将木蔻山发布宪报，是因为有集团接洽州政府，表示有意

发展木蔻山。在民政执政时已完成提呈木蔻山为宪报的程序，只是等待州政

府将木蔻山放入宪报内并列为保护区，如此一来木蔻山就列为永久森林，不

允许发展，若要发展也仅是限制性发展。

“但是，从民联政府执政至今，木蔻山仍未宪报成为保护区，经查悉原来

是有集团接洽州政府建议要发展木蔻山。州政府曾说，木蔻山将在2009年列

为宪报成为保护区，但是至今仍不见木蔻山被列为保护区；若州政府认为木

蔻山发展会为槟城带来经济成长，就应该对外公布，但州政府没有做到。＂

大爆料：拒中央推荐的州秘书人选槟州政府口口声声表示中央拒绝配合州政府，然而在前任槟州秘书荣休

后，中央政府历史性上首次推荐两个华裔槟州秘书人选予槟民联政府，但槟

民联政府却不要接受两名华裔名字的人选。

“他们反而指定要再那拉欣担任州秘书一职，而联邦政府最后也妥协，委

任州政府指定的人选来担任州秘书一职。＂

大爆料：州预算案内并没制度化的拨款民联州政府并没有在州预算案内阐明制度化拨款给独中、国民型中小学、

教会学校及淡小，反而是列在首长署及州秘书署下，所以根本所谓的“制度

化拨款＂并没有“制度＂！

“民联政府一直声称是首个制度化拨款予独中、国民型中小学、教会学校

及淡小的州属，不过，若没有在州预算案中阐明这事项，根本不算是制度化

拨款；其实民政执政时，也是一样从首长署拨款予各校！＂

“Chang Yeow takes on Liew”针对刘镇东指控民联面对中央政府刁难一事，邓章耀同志又以

事实马上反驳并推翻对方的说法。

邓章耀透露，第九大马计划的拨款就未被拦截，升旗山和第二

大桥计划也照跑，而第十大马计划也有待列出项目。

“公务员体制的问题，民政党执政时也一样面对公务员问题，

所以民联不可当成借口；而且100令吉回馈金计划如果没有政府机

构配合，试问如何实行？＂

同时，刘镇东也被邓章耀以“民联总是一再把“过错归前朝，

贡献是今朝＂挂口中，试问合作从何谈起？＂来反驳他所提出朝

野应该合作的建议而语塞。邓章耀同志也提醒说，槟州在许子根

领导下的14个年头有盈余，仅4年赤字，唯未大肆宣传。

推翻中央刁難說法

1

2

3

1.木蔻山宪报遥遥无期

2.拒中央推荐的州秘书人选

3.州预算案内并没制度化拨款

汇整自：《光华日报》及《当今大马》图片：《光华日报》及《南洋商报》提供

檳州民聯三大謊言

3大實例，鄧章耀民聯謊言！

邓章耀同志抨击，槟州政府的公开招标只公开招标的“答案＂（承包商），

而并没有公开整个招标过程的细节；但是人民要的是政府公开整个招标过程

的程序及细节，而并非答案。

“民政党执政槟州时已推行公开招标计划，而招标结果是由州秘书为首的委

员会开会决定。反观，现在是由林冠英来决定公开招标的一切结果，这会否

导致结果出现偏差？＂

同时，他也透露升旗山缆车系统提升计划多次进行公开招标，是因为林冠英

不满得标的公司，而屡次公开招标，以让属意的公司得标。

另外，邓章耀也指出，槟州政府大事宣扬槟州外资在2008年取得102亿令吉

收入，不过2009年外

资只有20亿令吉时

州政府却没有对外

公布。虽然经济衰退

是全球性问题，国内

各州属都面对经济衰

退，但吉州外资跌幅

度只有52%，而槟州

却达到80%，这显示

其他州属能成功在逆

境以最高优惠吸引外

资，而槟城却无法做

到。

檳州“能力、問責、透明＂施政方針是假象


Is Penang getting any better since 2008? The people voted for a change of the Penang state government in the

2008 General Elections, hoping that it would bring new vitality, progress, and improvements to their quality of life.

Unfortunately, two years later, things are not getting better. There is

no continuation of development plan. Almost everything in the state is a standstill.Admittedly the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) state government has done well to “pull wool over the people’s eye with their clever publicity stunts and dramatic shows. Nevertheless the truth will prevail and their “ugly heads” will be exposed.

Political scientist Wong Chin Huat, who was present at the debate,

concurred that the PR state government was good at acting in serial episodes.

Wong added that Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia (PGRM) and its

president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon were not good at “acting”. “Things which needed to be said out, they didn’t say so. This is one reason, the party did badly in the 2008 General Elections,” said Wong.

On March 13, Gerakan secretary-general Teng Chang Yeow took on

the Chief Minister’s policy adviser and Bukit Bendera MP Liew Chin Tong in a political debate hosted by NTV7. The topic of the debate in Mandarin was Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Competition: Change in two years, Penang gets better?”

Liew was floored to the ground by Teng who came with facts and figures.

Liew had no answers to Teng’s line of attack. Many in the audience gave approval ratings to Teng who showed his skillfulness, forcefulness and articulation on matters concerning the people and Penang.Here Gerakan4u reproduced some of their keypoints.

Teng stressed that when BN was in power, it also faced many obstacles

and challenges. “Therefore, regardless of which party is in power, every effort must be made to develop Penang. The state cannot afford to remain behind in terms of development and progress,” he said, to applause from members of the audience.Teng said the previous BN government was very keen in promoting environmental protection and Penang became the first state in Peninsular Malaysia, to have two state parks, as well as a National Park.In his usual hard-hitting, no nonsense address, Teng put forth his arguments in a frank and direct way.“

The PR state government even showed a lack of urgency on such an important matter to gazette Pulau Jerejak as a Forest Reserve as it did not want to further restrict the development plans. I understand that a consortium had earlier approached the state government on a proposal to develop Pulau Jerejak. Is this the reason for the delay in the gazettement. The state government should give an explanation.”

“Also, the PR state government has been telling the whole world that it has institutionalised allocations to schools.“But when I repeatedly checked the 2009 and 2010 Penang budgets, I couldn’t find any specific funding allocated for schools. So, I can only presume that such allocations announced by PR state government are included in the expenditure under the Chief Minister and State Secretary Office. So, how can the PR government call the allocation “institutional funds”? This is nothing new. Theirs is just a continuation of what the previous BN administration had been doing.”

Liew criticised the federal government, saying there is “one country two systems” policy, including unfair funding to Penang and non-

cooperation of civil servants.“This is the reason the PR state government could not perform well.” When Teng challenged Liew to give specific examples, Liew evaded the question and went on to dwell on some other trivial matters. Teng then said the federal government had continued to fulfill its commitment under the Ninth Malaysia Plan to the Penang State

Government for the past two years, and to complete infrastructure development and other projects. Referring to the issue of uncooperative civil servants raised by Liew, Teng said if there was no co-operation, how come the state government

is able to implement various programnes such as senior citizens’ rewards program, no plastic bags campaign, etc.?

“Chang Yeow takes on Liew”针对刘镇东指控民联面对中央政府刁难一事，邓章耀同志又以

事实马上反驳并推翻对方的说法。

邓章耀透露，第九大马计划的拨款就未被拦截，升旗山和第二

大桥计划也照跑，而第十大马计划也有待列出项目。

“公务员体制的问题，民政党执政时也一样面对公务员问题，

所以民联不可当成借口；而且100令吉回馈金计划如果没有政府机

构配合，试问如何实行？＂

同时，刘镇东也被邓章耀以“民联总是一再把“过错归前朝，

贡献是今朝＂挂口中，试问合作从何谈起？＂来反驳他所提出朝

野应该合作的建议而语塞。邓章耀同志也提醒说，槟州在许子根

领导下的14个年头有盈余，仅4年赤字，唯未大肆宣传。

汇整自：《光华日报》及《当今大马》图片：《光华日报》及《南洋商报》提供

戳破3大實例，鄧章耀民聯謊言！




聚焦 -FocusG

津贴需要还是不需要？哪些领域的津贴应该取消哪些

又应该保留呢？取消津贴又会对民生带来怎样的影响？

我国的津贴制度实行了多年，有无必要检讨甚至重组？

津贴对政府是一种负担，然而对低收入群却是一种辅

助。早前首相宣布重组我国津贴制度，社会各界人士对

这个宣布纷纷提出看法。津贴，应不应该？就听听我们

怎么说，他们又怎样说！

Subsidy : Yes Or No? 津貼：給或不給？Should subsidy remain or not? Which kind of subsidy

should be retained and which one should be abolished? How far will the people be affected by the abolition of subsidy? Do we need to review our subsidy system after it has been practiced for a long time?

Subsidy is a burden to the government, yet it is a need for the low income group. The PM said the government will reassess the subsidy system.

Subsidy needed or not needed? Let’s see what we and the others have said:

Wanita Chief and Domestic Trade, Cooperative and Consumerism Ministry Deputy Minister Sdri Tan Lian Hoe

1)The Government has good intentions in wanting to remove its sugar subsidy. Government will l isten to people before remove the sugar subsidy, people need to think wise the advantage and the disadvantage of sugar subsidy. 2)It’s not about the money, but the rising rate of Malaysians getting diabetes, obesity, cancer and other diseases related to the high intake of sugar.

3)The Government gives a lot of subsidy, as much as RM720mil annually, but is it bringing any good or causing something bad to people’s health?

妇女组主席兼贸消部副部长

陈莲花同志

1)政府欲取消白糖津貼的事，還是要聽取民意，而人民須想清楚到底這項津貼是好是壞。

2)政府津貼白糖看來不但沒有帶來任何好處，相反地帶來許多疾病。

3)政府提供津貼的原意是希望減輕人民負擔，為人民帶來好處，但白糖卻會損害人民健康，帶來各種疾病。因此，人民應認真想想是否應呼吁政府取消或減少白糖津貼？

Cost effects1.Subsidy leads to corruption and promoting monopoly in the market. 2.Participants are of the view that the government should move away from merely making short-term planning, and not to distort the truth by justifying national policies with mere rhetoric. It is important for the government to recognize the fact that Malaysians today are better informed, and better educated. 3.Subsidy tends to lead to smuggling of goods to neighboring countries, besides port ray ing Malaysia as adopting a macro fiscal policy that is not prudent, not practicing good governance and not in accordance with a stable financial system.

They said

1 ) C r o s s - c u t t i n g s u b s i d i e s intentionally create a market that is not real, because the prices are then fake. This creates a host of other problems. 2)In the case of gas, it appears as though Petronas’s subsidies are meant to be cross-cutt ing. Subsidies do not only go to natural gas for vehicles such as taxis, and the fishing sector, they also go to the power sector and other large consumers.3)In a subsidized environment, people cannot factor in true market prices when they make daily lifestyle decisions. For example, people continue to buy big cars.4)When subsidies are cross-cutting, they tend to benefit larger companies rather than the deserving poor. This could lead to irregularities in how subsidies are disbursed if there is a lack of transparency.5)I believe that a balance can be struck between lifting subsidies and helping the poor. Subsidies could be more targeted at the poor by using per capita income as the main eligibility criteria.6)If we want to subsidize certain business sectors, we can structure incentives such that they are given only to businesses that perform.

大马水源与能源消费人协会总秘书彼亚拉帕卡兰

1)交叉性的补贴是当局刻意制造不真实市场的手法，因为当时的价格是属于“假＂价格。这将会制造更多的问题。2)在拥有补贴的情况下，人民无法确知有关物

品的真正市价，以作为日常的开销估计。举例说，人民因此而继续购买大房车。3)如果补贴是交叉性的，有关受惠的往往是大

公司，而贪穷者将被抛在一旁。尤其在缺乏透明度的运作下，将很容易产生津贴被滥用或官员终饱私囊的问题。4)我相信，取消了补贴制反而会对穷人有利，

政府可以把所省下的款额用在补助穷人的工作上，比如把目标锁定在增加穷人的人均收入等。5)如果我们要补贴一些商业领域，我们可以通

过奖掖的桇构去进行，在这架构下，只有表现良好企业才能享有补贴。

Water and Energy Consumer Association of Malaysia secretary-general Piarapakaran Subramaniam

We said 我们说

Sdr Mah Siew Keong

1)The government’s decision to scrap the proposed tiered fuel subsidy plan, saying that shows the government has taken into account the people’s views and feedback.2)The government should now have more intensive and extensive consultation with all the stake holders in formulating new strategies to restructure subsidised fuel scheme.3)The setting up of a Subsidy Rationalisation Laboratory is also a good move. However, the study of the subsidy mechanism must be based on the people’s interest as any changes to the subsidy would impact on the people first.4)Introduction of new policy or scheme should also look into the sustainability of such subsidy scheme in the long run and its impact on the overall competitiveness and health of the nation economic well-being.

马袖强同志

1)政府放弃重组新燃料津贴机制的决定是明智之举，也是政府听取民意的一个具体行动。2)政府现在应广泛咨询各相关人士，另草拟一套更有效与可行的燃料津贴新机制。3)政府通过首相署设立一个“津贴合理化＂实验室，重新检讨国内的一切津贴措施，包括燃油津贴的作法，相信是一个好的开始。然而这个实验室，其研究及考虑的对像一定要以民意为先，因为一旦津贴制有所变动，受影响最大的仍是人民。4)新的津贴机制或政策必须考量到该机制的永续性，即该津贴机制长期对国家整体经济的竞争力及正成长率的影响。

Outcome of a “Roundtable discussion on Subsidy:Getting the System Right , ” organized by Gerakan.

Proposals1.Need to plug leakages in the implementation of government policies.2.The country and its leaders must have courage, conviction and political will to amend the current system, for a better Malaysia, for all Malaysians. 3.Subsidy is to help the deserving group, in a fair and efficient manner and reach target groups.4.A smart-subsidy scheme can be put in place while the government makes every effort to phase out subsidy.5.The government must make efforts for a gradual rise in wages so that the people can cushion the higher costs of living in the near future.6.We should also look into other commitments under the WTO membership, under other free-trade agreements; which will also necessitate our gradual lifting of subsidies. 7.Any subsidy system in place must be workable, reasonable, and able to eliminate the burden of the low-income households.

民政黨津貼圓桌會議總結津贴的影响 1。津贴导致腐败和市场垄断。 2。参与者皆认为，政府不应该再推行短期政

策，也不该以为国家政策辩护的方式来扭曲事实。最重要的是，政府要认清现今的大马人民已获得更好的教育，以及能从各方面获取资讯的事实。 3。津贴也是往往导致津贴物品走私到邻国的

主因，这反映了大马采取了不明智的宏观财政政策，也没有良好施政以及没有一致性的稳定金融体系。



Is Penang getting any better since 2008? The people voted for a change of the Penang state government in the 2008

General Elections, hoping that it would bring new vitality, progress, and improvements to their quality of life.

Unfortunately, two years later, things are not getting better. There is no

continuation of development plan. Almost everything in the state is a standstill. Admittedly the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) state government has done well to “pull

wool over the people’s eye with their clever publicity stunts and dramatic shows. Nevertheless the truth will prevail and their “ugly heads” will be exposed.

Political scientist Wong Chin Huat, who was present at the debate, concurred

that the PR state government was good at acting in serial episodes. Wong added that Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia (PGRM) and its president Tan

Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon were not good at “acting”. “Things which needed to be said out, they didn’t say so. This is one reason, the party did badly in the 2008 General Elections,” said Ong.

On March 13, Gerakan secretary-general Teng Chang Yeow took on the Chief

Minister’s policy adviser and Bukit Bendera MP Liew Chin Tong in a political debate hosted by NTV7. The topic of the debate in Mandarin was Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Competition: Change in two years, Penang gets better?”

Liew was floored to the ground by Teng who came with facts and figures. Liew

had no answers to Teng’s line of attack. Many in the audience gave approval ratings to Teng who showed his skillfulness, forcefulness and articulation on matters concerning the people and Penang.

Here Gerakan4u reproduced some of their keypoints. Teng stressed that when BN was in power, it also faced many obstacles and

challenges. “Therefore, regardless of which party is in power, every effort must be made to

develop Penang. The state cannot afford to remain behind in terms of development and progress,” he said, to applause from members of the audience.

Teng said the previous BN government was very keen in promoting

environmental protection and Penang became the first state in Peninsular Malaysia, to have two state parks, as well as a National Park.In his usual hard-hitting, no nonsense address, Teng put forth his arguments in a frank and direct way.

“The PR state government even showed a lack of urgency on such an important

matter to gazette Pulau Jerejak as a Forest Reserve as it did not want to further restrict the development plans. I understand that a consortium had earlier approached the state government on a proposal to develop Pulau Jerejak. Is this the reason for the delay in the gazettement. The state government should give an explanation.”

“Also, the PR state government has been telling the whole world that it has

institutionalised allocations to schools. “But when I repeatedly checked the 2009 and 2010 Penang budgets, I couldn’

t find any specific funding allocated for schools. So, I can only presume that such allocations announced by PR state government are included in the expenditure under the Chief Minister and State Secretary Office. So, how can the PR government call the allocation “institutional funds”? This is nothing new. Theirs is just a continuation of what the previous BN administration had been doing.”

Liew criticised the federal government, saying there is “one country two systems” policy, including unfair funding to Penang and non-cooperation of civil

servants.“This is the reason the PR state government could not perform well.” When Teng challenged Liew to give specific examples, Liew evaded the question and went on to dwell on some other trivial matters. Teng then said the federal government had continued to fulfill its commitment under the Ninth Malaysia Plan to the Penang State Government for the past

two years, and to complete infrastructure development and other projects. Referring to the issue of uncooperative civil servants raised by Liew, Teng said if there was no co-operation, how come the state government is able to

implement various programnes such as senior citizens’ rewards program, no plastic bags campaign, etc.?

Subsidy : Yes Or No? 津貼：給或不給？

1)There are different kinds of subsidies. We must make a distinction between government subsidies for the poor, and subsidies that are meant to promote and develop domestic enterprises. 2)Subsidies are necessary for both helping the poor and to nurture certain domestic sectors. Otherwise, we will be too dependent on multi-national companies which might not operate in the rakyat’s best interest. 3)In the case of oil and gas, it appears as though Petronas’s subsidies are meant to be cross-cutting. Subsidies do not only go to natural gas for vehicles such as taxis, and the fishing sector, but they also go to the power sector and other large consumers.

马来亚大学教授依姆特仁斯博士

1)津贴可分为多种，包括政府的补贴是让穷人受惠，及有助于促进和发展国内企业的。2)我认为，政府所给予的补贴或津贴，应该是能兼顾扶贫及国家各领域发展的。否

则，国人将会过度依赖于所谓的大企业或跨国公司，而这些公司可能无法带给人民最佳的利益。3)在天然氣津貼的課題上，有關補貼是來自國油公司，目前，這補貼是屬於交叉性的。我認為，這項補貼不應只照顧到車輛，德士及漁業者，也應該讓能源領域和廣泛的消費者受惠。

Cost effects1.Subsidy leads to corruption and promoting monopoly in the market. 2.Participants are of the view that the government should move away from merely making short-term planning, and not to distort the truth by justifying national policies with mere rhetoric. It is important for the government to recognize the fact that Malaysians today are better informed, and better educated. 3.Subsidy tends to lead to smuggling of goods to neighboring countries, besides port ray ing Malaysia as adopting a macro fiscal policy that is not prudent, not practicing good governance and not in accordance with a stable financial system.

他们说They said

Universiti Malaya’s Prof Dr Edmund Terence Gomez

1 ) C r o s s - c u t t i n g s u b s i d i e s intentionally create a market that is not real, because the prices are then fake. This creates a host of other problems. 2)In the case of gas, it appears as though Petronas’s subsidies are meant to be cross-cutt ing. Subsidies do not only go to natural gas for vehicles such as taxis, and the fishing sector, they also go to the power sector and other large consumers.3)In a subsidized environment, people cannot factor in true market prices when they make daily lifestyle decisions. For example, people continue to buy big cars.4)When subsidies are cross-cutting, they tend to benefit larger companies rather than the deserving poor. This could lead to irregularities in how subsidies are disbursed if there is a lack of transparency.5)I believe that a balance can be struck between lifting subsidies and helping the poor. Subsidies could be more targeted at the poor by using per capita income as the main eligibility criteria.6)If we want to subsidize certain business sectors, we can structure incentives such that they are given only to businesses that perform.

大马水源与能源消费人协会总秘书彼亚拉帕卡兰

1)交叉性的补贴是当局刻意制造不真实市场的手法，因为当时的价格是属于“假＂价格。这将会制造更多的问题。2)在拥有补贴的情况下，人民无法确知有关物

品的真正市价，以作为日常的开销估计。举例说，人民因此而继续购买大房车。3)如果补贴是交叉性的，有关受惠的往往是大

公司，而贪穷者将被抛在一旁。尤其在缺乏透明度的运作下，将很容易产生津贴被滥用或官员终饱私囊的问题。4)我相信，取消了补贴制反而会对穷人有利，

政府可以把所省下的款额用在补助穷人的工作上，比如把目标锁定在增加穷人的人均收入等。5)如果我们要补贴一些商业领域，我们可以通

过奖掖的桇构去进行，在这架构下，只有表现良好企业才能享有补贴。

Water and Energy Consumer Association of Malaysia secretary-general Piarapakaran Subramaniam

1)I am not against subsidies in general, but that subsidies must be given more sensibility. As it is, with fuel subsidies, the people who benefit the most are the people who use the most fuel.

2)Therefore, when fuel prices skyrocketed in June 2008, the rich were ultimately able to absorb the shock. The Malaysian government subsidizes fuel, but in the 1980s and 1990s, they did not subsidize the growing public transport sector.

3)With huge capital costs and potentially good long-term effects, public transport was actually the sector that needed subsidies. Income for taxpayers could be used to subsidize healthcare for the poor. There are positive side-effects to keep people with lower income healthy.

新加坡国民大学副教授保罗巴特博士

1)普遍上我并不反对补贴制度，但是补贴的给予必须是具有理智的。比如在燃油补贴的事项上，那些使用更多燃油者反而得到更多的补贴。2)因此，当燃油价格在2008年6月高涨时，富有者所受的影响反而更少。大马政府

在1980及1990年开始提供燃油补贴，但是却没有增加补贴予公共交通领域。3)在巨额及具有长远潜能的情况下，公共交通其实更需要燃油补贴。政府可以把纳

税人的税收用在补贴穷人医药保健工作上，这将可以兼顾到低收入者的健康。

Asst Prof Dr Paul Barter of the National University of Singapore

马袖强同志

1)政府放弃重组新燃料津贴机制的决定是明智之举，也是政府听取民意的一个具体行动。2)政府现在应广泛咨询各相关人士，另草拟一套更有效与可行的燃料津贴新机制。3)政府通过首相署设立一个“津贴合理化＂实验室，重新检讨国内的一切津贴措施，包括燃油津贴的作法，相信是一个好的开始。然而这个实验室，其研究及考虑的对像一定要以民意为先，因为一旦津贴制有所变动，受影响最大的仍是人民。4)新的津贴机制或政策必须考量到该机制的永续性，即该津贴机制长期对国家整体经济的竞争力及正成长率的影响。

Proposals1.Need to plug leakages in the implementation of government policies.2.The country and its leaders must have courage, conviction and political will to amend the current system, for a better Malaysia, for all Malaysians. 3.Subsidy is to help the deserving group, in a fair and efficient manner and reach target groups.4.A smart-subsidy scheme can be put in place while the government makes every effort to phase out subsidy.5.The government must make efforts for a gradual rise in wages so that the people can cushion the higher costs of living in the near future.6.We should also look into other commitments under the WTO membership, under other free-trade agreements; which will also necessitate our gradual lifting of subsidies. 7.Any subsidy system in place must be workable, reasonable, and able to eliminate the burden of the low-income households.

民政黨津貼圓桌會議總結津贴的影响 1。津贴导致腐败和市场垄断。 2。参与者皆认为，政府不应该再推行短期政

策，也不该以为国家政策辩护的方式来扭曲事实。最重要的是，政府要认清现今的大马人民已获得更好的教育，以及能从各方面获取资讯的事实。 3。津贴也是往往导致津贴物品走私到邻国的

主因，这反映了大马采取了不明智的宏观财政政策，也没有良好施政以及没有一致性的稳定金融体系。

建议 1。需要弥补政府政策执行上的偏差。 2。国家和领导人必须具备勇气、信念和政治意愿，修订现有的制度，为所有马来西亚人塑

造更好的大马。 3。津贴的宗旨是为了帮助特定的组群，以能通过公平和有效的方式，让相关的社群受惠。 4。应以精明津贴取代政府已取消的津贴。 5。政府必须努力逐步提高人民的工资，以便能减轻将来人民在高消费环境的生活负担。 6。我们还必须研究世贸组织的其他成员在其他自由贸易协定的承诺，我们也需要逐步取消

这方面的津贴。 7。任何的津贴制度必须是可行、合理的，并能消除低收入家庭的负担。




領袖專訪Face to Face

Name : Raymond Tan Shu KiahDesignation: National Vice President 姓名：陈树杰党职：全国副主席

Political CareerSince 1994: State Assemblyman for DUN N.46 Tanjung Papat, Sandakan, Sabah.2002–2008:Deputy President, Parti Maju Sabah (SAPP)2009–now:National Vice President, Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia

政治路程1994年至今：丹绒巴拔区州议员2002-2008：沙巴进步党署理主席2009至今：民政党副主席

Raymond Tan, a name known by Sabahans for 15 years but a new face to us. We recognize his contribution to Sabah from his records, but how about his views on Gerakan and even on politics? Let’s find out!

Q: Why did saudara choose to join Gerakan?A: Gerakan is an important component party of BN, the ruling Party. I have served as an elected BN ADUN in Tanjung Papat since 1994. I have never agreed that SAPP should leave BN. SAPP, as any component party of BN, represented BN in the last General Election with the BN Manifesto only. We were bound by the mandate given to us as BN representatives by the people who voted for us. When the President announced that SAPP was leaving BN on 17 Sept 2008, myself and other colleagues were put into a difficult position of how could we remain in BN.

In the ensuing months that followed, there were many political developments including the change of the Gerakan leadership and also the change of the PM. We didn’t join the Opposition parties and/or leaders or associate with them. Gerakan with the new leadership demonstrated its commitment to work with the PM in the process of “change” in BN and true in its service for the people. We want to be part of that process and Gerakan offered us a safe “home” irrespective of race or religion. The Gerakan President has given me a lot of encouragement and a strong belief that BN is always with the people and BN has to deliver what BN has promised.

Q: In your view, how will your joining of Gerakan help to better serve the Sabahans?A: Actually, it is Gerakan giving me a platform to serve the people, and not I giving Gerakan a service platform in Sabah.

With this platform I can serve the people without fear and favour of what we need to do and how to made Gerakan popular among Sabahans. The “Satu hati” slogan and “1Malaysia” concept make bearing the same which have to be accepted and supported by Sabahans.

People in Sabah want leaders who are sincere in their cause, working hard for the betterment of the people. People’s expectation have changed and people want leaders who are capable of meeting the challenges and provide a fair and just Government.

Q: Do you regret having lost the Sabah Deputy Chief Minister post after joining Gerakan?A: No. There were calls from Chinese leaders from BN component parties like LDP, PBS, MCA and native political leaders of UPKO that I was not “qualified” to serve as DCM when SAPP left BN. They all supported SAPP’s proposition that I should not have any posts in the State Government. LDP wanted the posts of DCM and Assistant Minister. They got the posts now. The CM has made other changes in a Cabinet reshuffle.

Q: Obviously, after your joining, Sabah Gerakan has been strengthened and expanded, do you have any specific plan to help advocate Gerakan’s political ideologies which are very consistent with the concept of 1Malaysia?A: Gerakan has a clear mission to serve the people and has an important role to play in the BN government to bring about changes in the administration.

Gerakan’s “Satu Hati” is mirrored in the concept of 1Malaysia. People in Sabah want to live in peace and harmony. As a role model for the country, Gerakan in Sabah will have to aggressively champion this cause.

Serving people does not require the number of positions in the Government, but we need to look at the role of party in the Government. My challenges are how to be a part of the party and how to play my role well, through the party platform and make our party ideology work. Lastly, my mission is to make Sabahans accept Gerakan.

Raymond : I don’t regret having lost the DCM postGerakan gives me a platform to perform 陳樹傑：不後悔失去副首長職反獲平台繼續服務


Untitled-9 2 4/21/2010 1:58:37 AM


陈树杰同志，在沙巴政坛早已耳熟能详的名字。在

去年5月5日他联同区锦华同志，一起加入民政党。对

于陈树杰，过去我们看到他对沙巴的贡献，如今成为

我们的一份子后，他对党的看法如何？他的政治见解

又如何？

问：请问在退出沙巴进步党后，什么原因让您选择

了民政党？

答：民政党对国阵而言，是一个举足轻重的成员

党。我自1994年就打着国阵的旗帜上阵丹绒巴拔并当

选为州议员，所以我无法认同沙巴进步党退出国阵一

事。

沙巴进步党身为国阵成员党之一，在上届大选代表

国阵、以国阵的竞选宣言出阵，而我们是以国阵候选

身份受到人民委托。因此当沙巴进步党主席在去年8

月17日宣布退出国阵时，我与其它同志当时是陷入两

难的窘局，尤其是如何继续留在国阵为民服务。

在接着的几个月，政局起了变化，包括民政党换了

一批新领导层及新首相上任。我并没有考虑过档反对

党，即使他们有游说我，但因为我看到民政党的新领

导层展示了他们要与首相一起“改变＂国阵的决心和

意愿，而且也是真心的为民服务，所以我要成为民政

党的一份子，一起进行这场革新，继续在政坛及政府

机关扮演我的角色。

况且民政党给了我一个不分种族与宗教的“安全的

家＂。党主席更是不时的给我鼓励及信念，那就是：

国阵永远与民同在，国阵有兑现他们的诺言。

问：随着您的加入，党将如何服务沙巴人民？

答：其实，应该说是党给我服务人民的平台，而不

是我给党平台去服务沙巴人民。

有了民政党的这个平台，我更无后顾之忧的去履行

/兑现我对沙巴选民的承诺，同时也让沙巴人民更认

识民政党，尤其是党的“万众一心＂和“一个马来西

亚＂其实是肩负一样的目标，而这个目标是已获得沙

巴人民的认可与肯定。

此外，沙巴人民的期望已经有所改变，他们要的是

一个勇于接受挑战并且不懈的为他们争取权益的领

袖，以打造一个公平和平等的政府。

问：加入民政党，却令你失去副首席部长一职，您

是否后悔？

答：从未后悔！

在我未加入民政党之前，的确是有不少国阵华基成

员党，如沙巴自由民主党、沙巴团结党、马华及民统

等认为，既然沙巴进步党退出国阵，我就失去担任副

首长的资格，同时他们也支持沙巴进步党的建议说我

不应该在州政府有任何的官职。而沙巴自由民主党最

后也争取到副首长及部长助理一职，而首长也在内阁

方面做出适当的调整。

问：沙巴民政党在您的加入后更加壮大了，您有何

计划去落实党的政治理念，尤其是“一个马来西亚＂

方面的目标。

答：民政党和我都有共同的目标。民政党很清楚知

道自己服务人民的目标以及在对改革国阵方面的重要

角色。而且民政党的“万众一心＂和“一个马来西

亚＂是有异曲同工之妙。沙巴人民追求和谐，这是全

国的楷模，因此这是沙巴民政必须积极朝向的目标。

服务人民不应该在于官职的多寡，而是胥视他在政

府内所能扮演的角色。我的其中挑战就是如何在党内

扮演我的角色，如何通过党这个平台，把党理念化为

行动的落实它，并让沙巴人民接受民政党。

Raymond : I don’t regret having lost the DCM postGerakan gives me a platform to perform 陳樹傑：不後悔失去副首長職反獲平台繼續服務


Untitled-9 3 4/21/2010 1:59:39 AM



新思潮New Thoughts











Liew was floored to the ground by

Teng who came with facts and figures. Liew had no answers to Teng’s line of attack. Many in the audience gave approval ratings to Teng who showed his skillfulness, forcefulness and articulation on matters concerning the people and Penang.

Here Gerakan4u reproduced some

of their keypoints. Teng stressed that when BN was in

power, it also faced many obstacles and challenges.

“Therefore, regardless of which

party is in power, every effort must be made to develop Penang. The state cannot afford to remain behind in terms of development and progress,” he said, to applause from members of the audience.

Te n g s a i d t h e p r e v i o u s B N

g o v e r n m e n t w a s v e r y k e e n i n promoting environmental protection and Penang became the first state in Peninsular Malaysia, to have two state parks, as well as a National Park.In

his usual hard-hitting, no nonsense address, Teng put forth his arguments in a frank and direct way.

“The PR state government even showed a lack of urgency on such an important matter to gazette Pulau Jerejak as a Forest Reserve as it did not want to

further restrict the development plans. I understand that a consortium had earlier approached the state government on a proposal to develop Pulau Jerejak. Is this the reason for the delay in the gazettement. The state government should give an explanation.”

“Also, the PR state government has been telling the whole world that it has institutionalised allocations to schools. “But when I repeatedly checked the 2009 and 2010 Penang budgets, I couldn’t find any specific funding allocated for schools. So, I can only presume that

such allocations announced by PR state government are included in the expenditure under the Chief Minister and State Secretary Office. So, how can the PR government call the allocation “institutional funds”? This is nothing new. Theirs is just a continuation of what the previous BN administration had been doing.”





“We are rebuilding our home bases in Penang, Perak, Selangor. I decided to take up a position in the federal government so that we can start to play this role,” he said, adding that Penang remains Gerakan’s most important base.

In an interview with The Edge Financial Daily, Dr Koh talks about challenges ahead for the party, its ups and downs, and efforts to revitalize and rejuvenate.

In the last one year, we’ve increased the number of assemblymen from four to seven — two independents from Sabah and one from Pahang. These three are not “katak” (frogs) in the normal definition.

The two from Sabah left SAPP, because of principles after the party quit BN, and remained as independents for quite a long period. The one in Pahang had left MCA even before the election and contested as

an independent.

But we are proud that we are now getting thousands of members in Sabah and a lot in Pahang. In a way, we are expanding faster in other states than our three home bases. That’s why we recently amended our constitution to increase the maximum number of branches under a division from 18 to 24.

Dr Koh, who is also Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of National Unity and Key Performance, said playing as an opposition in Penang, Selangor and Perak was not simple as the party did not have any representative in the state assemblies.

We can do it through press statements or working with NGOs. We cannot sit there and do nothing or theorising. That’s why in Gerakan FT, some of them have gone into environmental work while others have

taken up on issues. For us to be noisy, some of us feel very

unnatural. It’s okay for me to debate with Lim Guan Eng but to get me to go on the streets and demonstrate or be noisy over every issue, I say “Hey! That’s not quite right”.

Some of our younger people are taking it up, in Penang especially. In Penang, we are nurturing a group of young people to engage in issues and people again. But it will definitely take a while.

Our youth and other leaders in Penang have started doing their dut ies as an opposition and have started to criticise the government. My latest point was during Chinese New Year, I advised Lim Guan Eng to start governing and stop politicking.

If we go into election tomorrow, realistically, it’s going to be quite an uphill battle although I wouldn’t go as far as Tun Dr Lim Keng Yaik to say it is impossible. But let this be

a “mission impossible” and make it very exciting. The movie Mission Impossible wouldn’t be so exciting if it was not so impossible!

Dr Koh said the 2008 political tsunami hit Gerakan hardest because all its seats were in the urban and semi-urban areas. We were reduced from a party of 10 MPs and 30 state assemblymen to two MPs and four state assemblymen. Those of us who could not accept the reality left or went into inactivity.

Most of our leaders have devoted a lot of their time to contribute or work in government positions. Some who were very used to working with the government jumped over and they were welcomed (by the other side) because they were well-trained.

In the past, we had over 100 municipal and district councillors and hundreds of JKKK members, (but) suddenly most of them had nothing to do. Some of them even felt angry with the leadership, at BN and the government.

We are not as visible as before. In the past, when our YBs went to dinner functions, they would be seated at the head table and be requested to give a speech. Now, they are seated at No 4 table, just enough to interact, and listen to opposition YBs attack us, not being able to answer.

It is now more stable compared to a year ago and we are getting our feet back on the ground.

To a question as how Gerakan is going to come back in politics, Dr Koh said “If we are in politics for position, then without position there is no more role in politics. But we are in politics for idealism, for wanting to serve and to be an opposition in Penang in (itself) is a big adjustment after playing the leading role in government for 39 years. We have to tell the members that there is still meaningful life in politics.”

He said he perhaps, he needed to learn how to better manage divergent views and feelings of party members. But, I will not do anything that is against my principles and personal character.

On how he felt to be criticised openly by his predecessor and sifu, Dr Koh said his Confucian upbringing at home and in school taught me to

respect his elders and to take criticism in stride.

What more when we have a leader, and an elder, who has led the party for 28 years, who built up the party from its regional base confined to Penang to a nation-wide party with the third largest number of elected representatives (both MPs and state assemblymen in total) within the Barisan Nasional until 2008. Both Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu and Tun Dr Lim Keng Yaik deserve our respect.

On CAT (competency, accountability, transparency) slogan, giving money, etc, by the PR government in Penang, Dr Koh said BN could match them, except for giving money directly to the people which we did not do (other than in welfare cases).

As for CAT governance, we’ve actually been practising it. The Penang Water Corporation is the best-run water corporation with the cheapest water tariff and yet it made the most profit. When we were listed nine years ago, the company immediately qualified for the Main Board of Bursa Malaysia.

The state government kept 55% and 10% by Penang Water Corporation, 10% by EPF, 25% for the general public and water consumers. That was sharing. And I resisted many attempts by big companies wanting to privatise the company. What we did not do was to make it a fanfare. We announced, stated the principle and maybe it was a bit boring.

In terms of the state’s finances, when I first became CM, the state reserve was only RM50 million. By the time I left, it was RM400 million. Other than a few years in my 18 years as CM, Penang (state budget) turned deficit into surplus. Now that he (Lim Guan Eng) has two years of (turning) deficit into surplus, he’s talking like he’s the only (one) doing it.

There was also a call to replace me as the Penang Water Corporation (PBA) chairman on allegations that I was prejudiced as the PBA’s top management was overwhelmingly dominated by Chinese. I responded with a rational explanation of historical legacy and meritocracy.

Re-strategising for the future, Dr KohReproduced from The Edge Financial Daily

“ Gerakan has re-strategising itself to

play a role, a more effective role, at

both federal and state levels following

its dismal showing in the 2008 General

Elections.

”


新思潮New Thoughts

他说，为了让槟城、霹雳及雪兰莪能够恢复士气，他毅然接下部长职，以部长职作为重新开跑的起点。不过他强调，槟州仍然是党的重要堡垒和核心。

在与《The Edge Financial Daily》的专访过程中，许子根同志分析了党的未来挑战、党起起落落的政途以及将来如何恢复党士气及活力的工作。

他透露，在过去的一年，党已经从4个州议席增加至7个州议席：2名是沙巴独立人士及1名来自彭亨的独立人士，而这3名加入民政党大家庭的新党员都不是政治青蛙。

“该2名沙巴州议员陈树杰和区锦华是基于无法认同沙巴进步党退出国阵的原因，而选择了民政党；而彭亨的新党员何业嘉则一早就退出马华，甚至在上届大选是以独立人士竞选受到人民委托。＂

许子根同志对于能够吸引了逾千名沙巴同志及彭亨同志加入民政党感到骄傲，证明了我们党能够在3大核心州以外的州属迅速扩大版图。

同时也是肩负首相署部长(团结事务及绩效管理)的党主席指出，要在槟城、雪兰莪及霹雳扮演反对党的角色不易，因为党在该3州是没有任何一个议席。

“因此我们只能透过发文告或者与非政府组织合作来履行反对党的角色。我们不能坐以待毙或着满口理论而已；这也是为何民政党直辖区及其它区会已经积极的展开环保的工作。＂

他不讳言，要民政党扮演喧闹式的角色，我们的一些人会认为那是一种娇作。

“所以你要我跟林冠英辩论我没有问题，但是如果你要我上街示威，我只能对你说：嘿，那不是正确的管道！＂

同时，他说，槟城领袖及民青团已经开始执行了反对党的工作，甚至他本身也已经开始对槟州政策弊端作出批评。

他坦言，如果明天是大选，这将会是很严峻的考验，但是他不敢说如敦林敬益所言般不可能。

“我们就把它当作一项不可能任务，然后将它变成很有挑战性！就如电影“不可能任务＂，如果没有了哪个挑战的因素，那就不是“不可能任务＂了。＂

许子根同志说，2008的政治海啸卷走民政党所有在城市及半城市的议席；我们从拥有10个国会议席、30个州议席减至2个国会议席和4个州议席。哪些无法接受事实的前同志选择退党或者进入“冬眠＂状态。

他表示，多数的领袖依然忠诚付出他们的时间来为党及其官职作贡献，而一些过去哪些对政府行政工作熟悉的前党员则跳槽，基于经验丰富他们也受到敌对党的欢迎。

他吐露，在过去我们有逾百名的市县议员及上百名的乡村发展委员会，可是杀那间他们突然失去一切，因此一些就怨气于领导层、国阵及政府。

“我们也已经不似以往般受到瞩目。昔日，当我们的人民代议士出席宴会，通常都是被安排在主桌，而且还被邀请上台致词；但是今日，他们被安排坐普通桌，就是哪种刚好可以与主办单位交流、听敌对党在台上攻击我们，但是却没有给机会我们去反驳的位置。＂

不过，他说比较于1年前，目前的情况好多了，而且我们也逐渐获得民间的反应。

询及民政党如何再回到政坛上，许同志说，如果我们是为了议席而从政，那么没了议席也就失去了角色；但是我们是为了政治理念、是为了服务以及在槟城执政了39年后要当反对党，是一个大调整。不过，我还是要告诉党员，我们的政治生涯还有很多意义。

“或许我需要学习如何处理党内的歧见及党员的感受。但是我绝对不会作出任何违背于我的原则及性格的事情。＂

至于他如何面对前任党主席兼“师父＂敦林

敬益较早前的喊话，熏陶于儒家思想的家庭及正规教育的许同志还是秉持尊师重道的态度来看待。

“拥有一个资深的前辈领袖：一个带领了党28年、一个将当初根基只在槟城而后扩大至全国，并将民政党发展成为在国阵内第3多人民代议士的党(国会及州议员的总人数)直到2008年，敦林苍佑及敦林敬益是值得获得我们的尊敬。＂

针对槟民联政府的CAT(能力、问责、透明)口号、100令吉回馈金等，许子根重申，国阵是能够配合他们，除了派钱给人民(包括其他的福利案件)。这是我党绝对不会去进行的政治手法。

他说，CAT的施政方针，其实民政党很早就已经贯彻。举例，槟城供水机构就提供了全马最便宜的水费而且同时间又有利润。当槟供水机构在9年前上市时，槟州供水控股有限公司马上获得在大马交易所主板上市。

在上市后，州政府掌握55% 股权、供水机构掌握10%股权，10%股权属公积金局、25%公开给广大的水供用户。这就是分享，在这方面，我被许多大公司抵制，他们很想我们私营化这公司。我们没有做到的就是在这事件上大事铺张。“我们只是照实的做出宣布，这可能会让人觉得沉闷。＂

许同志透露，在州财务方面，在他开始当首席部长时，州的储备金只是5000万令吉，而在他离开时，有关储备金已高达4亿令吉。

“在我做首长这18年来，槟州的财政预算案除了有几年是出现赤字，其他的年份都是有盈余的。但现在，林冠英指他只花了2年的时间，就把槟州财政转亏为盈，而且其说法，好像只有他一个人可以做到这一点。＂

他继说，也有人打电话来说，我在槟州供水机构主席职被取代是对的，因为我身为该机构的高层，却太过于偏重于华人职员的重用。我的反应是，历史遗留下来的和任人唯贤，是一项合理的解释。

重布棋局放眼未來

整理自：《The Edge Financial Daily》

“ 民政党在308后，已重布棋

局，以在中央或州属扮演更

具影响力的角色。

＂


我們的聲音Column & Blog

One Step Forward & Three Steps BackBy: Lim Si Pin, Gerakan Vice president & Youth chief

The very Anti-Thesis of 1Malaysia … if there’s such a thing, we are beginning to wonder!

It takes years to build up goodwill, trust and a harmonious relationship. And all it takes is another ‘Special Officer’ to break all of that … in a couple of seconds!Nasir Safar must be one of the ‘least’ educated special officers from the PM’s Office. Never one to make any sense and now that he had opened his ‘golden’ mouth, the gems just came spilling out. And its not very nice to hear though!

When PM took pains to visit the Thaipusam event in Batu Caves, we thought it was such a good gesture that we followed him to also see for ourselves the great turnout and atmosphere at the age-old Hindu Temple. It was also touted as the second time in the history of Malaysia that a PM took the trouble to come visit for himself the great majority of Indian people in this country and how they celebrated one of the grandest festival in South East Asia. His father was the first to do it.

Even Al-Jazeera covered the event for a full 10 minutes in their Night News Report, giving full coverage to the Indian Descendents in Malaysia and how the festival has come to be regarded as a annual crowd puller for tourism in Malaysia.

Then came a week later, a Special Officer took a great big hammer and shattered all of that. Calling Indian Malaysians ‘pendatang’ and Chinese Malaysian Ladies ‘whores’.

What is becoming of this country, al l of us have eyes to see. After 52 years of Independence, we still have this kind of derogatory remarks being hurled at each other. What was Nasir Safar trying to prove? That he was the almighty officer from the PMO and that nobody could touch him, even if he

had said it in good faith. This was the excuse (partial statement below) the PMO could cock-up, and that we are suppose to accept it and feel that everything is OK.

In a prompt reaction to what had happened, the PM’s Office quickly sent out a statement yesterday evening – “Nasir Safar, the special officer to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, who stirred a hornet’s nest with his stinging ‘racist’ remarks will resign. The remarks allegedly made by Nasir in Malacca today do not in any way reflect the views of the prime minister. Nasir never intended to make any derogatory remarks. He spoke at length on the contributions made by all races in developing the country. Nevertheless, Nasir apologises for any offence caused and in light of this, will tender his resignation.”

Resign for what? He should be kept longer in the PMO so that the Pakatan Rakyat coalition has got a better chance to pave the “Path to Putrajaya”, faster. I think we should start a petition campaign to reinstate this ‘illustrious’ officer from the PMO. Better still, give him a TanSri next year (because he’s already a Dato) for making it clear that the real Ketuanan Melayu concept needs a damn good Ambassador, and he’s the man for the job!Some say during the period from 2002-2008, this country was ruled by an institution called the “4th Floor Boys”. This were a smart group of young professionals who could outdo and out-argue anybody of this country and they veil a considerable amount of power in the weak hands of the 5th PM. Now comes another breed of animals who are standing-skin-close, advising and breathing the same air as the PM … people like Nasir Safar. I just wish that the PM knows what he is doing,

including the minutest family background, and psychological profiles of each and every one of his Political Secretaries and Special Officers. We cannot afford to get the equation wrong aga in and usher in another group of ‘new’ 4th floor boys.

A s a p o i n t o f r e f l e c t i o n , w e (especially Indian and Chinese of this country) shouldn’t be perturb by what has been said. If some lowly-officer can create such a stir in our sentiments just by saying something like that, how easily are we ’manipulatable’ by others whom have got deeper and more sinister intentions than this.We should learn to sieve through the substantial and unsubstantial remarks that comes our way. Are we so weak that we also have the siege-mentality of one other race (of this country) that will continue to haunt us? Mention the word ‘pendatang’, all the Chinese and Indians of this country will just go berserck (berserk)! When are we able to hear that ‘loaded word’ and not be disturb nor affected by it?

Nay … we should remian (remain) strong and steadfast in trying to build a truly Bangsa Malaysia, 1Malaysia, Middle Malaysia, Malaysian Malaysia … brother any more slogans?InsyaTuhan (I believe not gazetted, but if it is, please tell me), we shall live to see our children enjoy a harmonious country for the future.

Source: Reproduced from his blog: limsipin.com, 3/2/2010

又再是一幕舉劍的猴子戲！這回，不再是以

往我們見慣的臉孔。今天的主角變成了馬來土

著權威組織（Perkasa）的依不拉欣阿里。

Perkasa是剛足齡的組織，依不拉欣阿里則

是主席。在大事慶祝的首屆代表大會上，有人

高喊捍衛馬來人、馬來王室和回教的權益和地

位。主人家依不拉欣阿里惟恐大會悶壞了賓

客，索性豁出去上演自認英雄風範的三步曲

--亮劍、舉劍、吻劍的戲碼。唉，麻木的劇

情，要說英雄，倒不如形容狗熊更為貼切。

在麻木中，這回觀眾卻帶著氣憤的情緒。因

為，前首相敦馬哈迪醫生為他站台。這彷彿是

一齣三流的電影，邀請了一位近乎過氣的影

星，試圖締造創票房的佳績。

依不拉欣阿里是國會議員。在這君主立憲的

民主國家裡，他獲得人民的支持，在國會擁有

平台。照理來說，他可以通過文明的方式，爭

取他所認為對或應該做的事情。但他卻選擇

了，成立所謂的非政府組織，扮演了極端、激

進的民族英雄，向各方開炮。好像是整個馬來

西亞的民間組織、政黨或個人，都得罪了他。

他要尊崇自己的宗教地位固然無不妥；他要

保衛自己的族群權益也無可厚非；他要捍衛馬

來王室地位也是名正言順。這幾個環節，根

本就是白紙黑字的在憲法裡闡明了。除此之

外，更收錄在讓我們倒背也如流的5大國家原

則（Rukunegara）裡。都什麼時代了？！世

界已經沒有邊疆了，每個國家都努力的在團

結國民，放下成見，異中求同，面對全球化的

衝擊和改變。然而，

馬來西亞還有一位國

會議員，躲在極端種

族思維的井底，做他

種族英雄的春夢。毕

竟，这片国土的许多

角落，还躲藏着和依不拉欣阿里一样思维的极

端分子。对于这类心怀政治议程的人物，让我

们同心协力，用文明的民主方式教训他们。

當人民逐漸成熟，踏上跨越種族，開往文明

的列車時，回頭一看，車窗外卻還留下了一些

人，依不拉欣阿里和為他亮劍、舉劍、吻劍而

歡呼的支持者，作繭自縛，顯然的，他們和文

明嚴重脫軌了！

轉載自：中国報《四方城》，4/2/2010

他接不上文明的軌道文：涂仲仪

槟州宣传、资讯及通讯局秘书



“州＂記States’ Highlights

Q1: Two years have passed, has Kedah changed under the PR state government?

A1: There is practically not much change in the state under PAS-dominated Pakatan Rakyat state government except for the restrictive policy against development like the 50% Bumiputra Housing Policy. Almost all the present development projects in the state are those initiated by the previous BN led government.

The p resen t PR government on ly continues everything the same from the previous administration, any failure or outcry in the state will be blamed on the previous administration. Credit will be claimed if there are no outstanding problems. There is now more emphasis on religious development.

Q2: As PAS dominates the Kedah government, do we see any Islamic policies? How are the responses from people on those policies?

A2: The present PR government has introduced a number of controversial Islamic measures in line with the Islamic State policy. The notable one is the demolition of the only pig abattoir in Alor Setar. Other new policies include the strict dress code for female models in advertisement and encouraging the use of Jawi in signboards. Recently, there is a proposal to separate women and men when they visit tourist spots such as hot springs in Kedah. PAS has always evaded giving answers when asked by non-Muslims regarding the new policies.

Q3: What do you think of these changes by Kedah state government? Do you think there is a need to review the policies?

A3: The PR government should review the anti-development policy such as the 50% Bumiputra Housing Policy and its decision to disallow swapping of land titles. Under previous BN administration, Malays reserve land in urban areas was allowed to swap with the same size of freehold title in the rural area .But the new decision of the PR government has curtailed housing development in the state,

as paddy land will not be allowed to be converted for development. So practically no new development project has been approved. And there is no clear policy about development. This has caused a drop of revenue for the state. All the down line under housing development has been affected.

Q4: How can Gerakan play its role in the future?

A4: Kedah Gerakan has adopted a closer-to-people approach to regain the confidence of voters towards BN. Gerakan Kedah wants to retain Derga state seat, retake the Sidam state seat and help BN to regain the other lost grounds. Serving the needy and having direct contact with the people is very important. Gerakan will explain to the people to be more alert with state issues which will have direct bearing on their daily life. We will tell the people not to be too engrossed with national issues. Gerakan Kedah has the role to explain to the people about 1Malaysia concept introduced by the PM. Gerakan Kedah is aware the people needs a transparent, efficiency and liberal government. There is no other approach other than hard work.

1.吉打州民聯政府已執政了2年，請問吉打州這2年來起了怎樣的變化，有關的變化是正面還是負面的居多？

答1：吉打州在回教黨的執政下，兩年來幾乎沒有任何的發展與改變，但是不利人民的政策如50%土著固打房屋政策卻被推行了，目前州內所有已被發展的計劃，都是前國陣政府所留下的。現有的回教黨政府，只是延續前朝政府所推行的計劃，唯一改變的，是新政府增加了很多回教化的政策，而且只要是稍有表現，回教黨政府就會大事宣傳及搶功勞。

2.請問，在回教黨執政下，吉打州是否曾经建议或已经推行回教化的施政，這些政策在民間引起了怎樣的反應？

答2：吉打州回教黨政府在上台後，的確有推行多項具爭議性，而且只有在回教國家才會推行的回教化措施。我可以舉出幾個州政府曾经建议推行回教政策的例子，如摧毀州

內唯一宰豬場、廣告牌上的女模須戴頭巾、鼓勵商號或招牌寫上爪夷文；此外州务大臣也曾建议在乌鲁乐贡温泉旅遊勝地，划分男女區等。而且，對於非回教徒的不滿，回教黨都採取迴避或不理會的態度。

3.您覺得吉打州民聯政府所推行的哪些政策，是應該重新被檢討的？

答3：是的，政府有必須重新檢討多項對人民不利的政策，包括開吉州房屋發展倒車的50%土著固打房屋政策及土地權轉移的政策。在國陣執政時，吉打州的土地條規，可讓人民，用郊區同樣大小的永久地契土地交換位於市區的馬來保留地。但是，新政府卻不讓人民把稻田轉換，以作其他用途，這已進一步削弱了吉打州的房屋發展。

在過去兩年來，州內沒有任何新的房屋發展計劃被批准，同時政府也沒有任何明確的房屋發展政策。這情況已導致吉打州的收入大大減少，而所有涉及房屋發展的下遊工業

都受到打擊。4：吉打州民政黨在未來將繼續扮演怎麼樣的角色？

答4：吉打州民政黨將會通過更親民的政策與方式以重新贏回人民對國陣的支持。在來屆大選，吉打州民政黨不止要保住德卡區州議席，也要重新奪回西塘區議席。我們也會協助國陣奪回在2008年3月8號時失去的所有議席。

服務所需及直接與人民聯繫是非常重要的，民政黨將會把焦點放在向人民解釋吉打州課題的工作上，讓吉打州人民不要因為全國性的課題而影響投票取向。我們也會向吉打州人民解釋由首相所提出的一個大馬政策。

吉打州民政黨很清楚人民是需要一個透明、高效率及開明的政府，而要重新贏取人民的支持，除了努力就沒有其他方法了。

執政兩年，吉打發展停滯吉打州联委会主席谢顺海同志剖析吉打政府行政

Almost a standstill for Kedah after 2 years

Kedah Gerakan chairman Sdr Cheah Soon Hai speaks to Gerakan Matters













Liew was fl oored to the ground by Teng who came with facts and fi gures. Liew






environmental protection and Penang became the fi rst state in Peninsular Malaysia, to have two state parks, as well as a National Park.In his usual hard-hitting, no nonsense address, Teng put forth his arguments in a frank and direct way.





t find any specific funding allocated for schools. So, I can only presume that such allocations announced by PR state government are included in the expenditure under the Chief Minister and State Secretary Offi ce. So, how can the PR government call the allocation “institutional funds”? This is nothing new. Theirs is just a continuation of what the previous BN administration had been doing.”


servants.“This is the reason the PR state government could not perform well.” When Teng challenged Liew to give specifi c examples, Liew evaded the question and went on to dwell on some other trivial matters. Teng then said the federal government had continued to fulfi ll its commitment under the Ninth Malaysia Plan to the Penang State Government for the past



Q1: Two years have passed, has Kedah changed under the PR state government?

A1: There is practically not much change in the state under PAS-dominated Pakatan Rakyat state government except for the restrictive policy against development like the 50% Bumiputra Housing Policy. Almost all the present development projects in the state are those initiated by the previous BN led government.

The p resen t PR government on ly continues everything the same from the previous administration, any failure or outcry in the state will be blamed on the previous administration. Credit will be claimed if there are no outstanding problems. There is now more emphasis on religious development.

Q2: As PAS dominates the Kedah government, do we see any Islamic policies? How are the responses from people on those policies?

A2: The present PR government has introduced a number of controversial Islamic measures in line with the Islamic State policy. The notable one is the demolition of the only pig abattoir in Alor Setar. Other new policies include the strict dress code for female models in advertisement and encouraging the use of Jawi in signboards. Recently, there is a proposal to separate women and men when they visit tourist spots such as hot springs in Kedah. PAS has always evaded giving answers when asked by non-Muslims regarding the new policies.

Q3: What do you think of these changes by Kedah state government? Do you think there is a need to review the policies?

A3: The PR government should review the anti-development policy such as the 50% Bumiputra Housing Policy and its decision to disallow swapping of land titles. Under previous BN administration, Malays reserve land in urban areas was allowed to swap with the same size of freehold title in the rural area .But the new decision of the PR government has curtailed housing development in the state,

as paddy land will not be allowed to be converted for development. So practically no new development project has been approved. And there is no clear policy about development. This has caused a drop of revenue for the state. All the down line under housing development has been affected.

Q4: How can Gerakan play its role in the future?

A4: Kedah Gerakan has adopted a closer-to-people approach to regain the confi dence of voters towards BN. Gerakan Kedah wants to retain Derga state seat, retake the Sidam state seat and help BN to regain the other lost grounds. Serving the needy and having direct contact with the people is very important. Gerakan will explain to the people to be more alert with state issues which will have direct bearing on their daily life. We will tell the people not to be too engrossed with national issues. Gerakan Kedah has the role to explain to the people about 1Malaysia concept introduced by the PM. Gerakan Kedah is aware the people needs a transparent, efficiency and liberal government. There is no other approach other than hard work.

1.吉打州民聯政府已執政了2年，請問吉打州這2年來起了怎樣的變化，有關的變化是正面還是負面的居多？

答1：吉打州在回教黨的執政下，兩年來幾乎沒有任何的發展與改變，但是不利人民的政策如50%土著固打房屋政策卻被推行了，目前州內所有已被發展的計劃，都是前國陣政府所留下的。現有的回教黨政府，只是延續前朝政府所推行的計劃，唯一改變的，是新政府增加了很多回教化的政策，而且只要是稍有表現，回教黨政府就會大事宣傳及搶功勞。

2.請問，在回教黨執政下，吉打州是否曾经建议或已经推行回教化的施政，這些政策在民間引起了怎樣的反應？

答2：吉打州回教黨政府在上台後，的確有推行多項具爭議性，而且只有在回教國家才會推行的回教化措施。我可以舉出幾個州政府曾经建议推行回教政策的例子，如摧毀州

內唯一宰豬場、廣告牌上的女模須戴頭巾、鼓勵商號或招牌寫上爪夷文；此外州务大臣也曾建议在乌鲁乐贡温泉旅遊勝地，划分男女區等。而且，對於非回教徒的不滿，回教黨都採取迴避或不理會的態度。

3.您覺得吉打州民聯政府所推行的哪些政策，是應該重新被檢討的？

答3：是的，政府有必須重新檢討多項對人民不利的政策，包括開吉州房屋發展倒車的50%土著固打房屋政策及土地權轉移的政策。在國陣執政時，吉打州的土地條規，可讓人民，用郊區同樣大小的永久地契土地交換位於市區的馬來保留地。但是，新政府卻不讓人民把稻田轉換，以作其他用途，這已進一步削弱了吉打州的房屋發展。

在過去兩年來，州內沒有任何新的房屋發展計劃被批准，同時政府也沒有任何明確的房屋發展政策。這情況已導致吉打州的收入大大減少，而所有涉及房屋發展的下遊工業

都受到打擊。4：吉打州民政黨在未來將繼續扮演怎麼樣的角色？

答4：吉打州民政黨將會通過更親民的政策與方式以重新贏回人民對國陣的支持。在來屆大選，吉打州民政黨不止要保住德卡區州議席，也要重新奪回西塘區議席。我們也會協助國陣奪回在2008年3月8號時失去的所有議席。

服務所需及直接與人民聯繫是非常重要的，民政黨將會把焦點放在向人民解釋吉打州課題的工作上，讓吉打州人民不要因為全國性的課題而影響投票取向。我們也會向吉打州人民解釋由首相所提出的一個大馬政策。

吉打州民政黨很清楚人民是需要一個透明、高效率及開明的政府，而要重新贏取人民的支持，除了努力就沒有其他方法了。

Gerakan Negeri Sembilan bersiap sedia menghadapi pilihanraya yang akan datang. Gerakan N.Sembilan telah mendirikan jawatankuasa pilihanraya untuk menyiapkan bakal calon pada pilihanraya yang akan datang.

Pengerusi N.Sembilan Sdr Chang Khee Choong menyatakan bahawa jawatankuasa tersebut telah mengenal pasti bakal calon. Bakal calon-calon serta pegawai daerah BN akan turun padang untuk memberi perkhidmatan kepada rakyat demi membolehkan rakyat membiasakan dir i dengan mereka.

Mengenai PR yang berniat untuk

merampas kuasa di N.Sembilan, beliau menyifatkan tindakan tersebut adalah slogan semata-mata dan ini juga merupakan taktik PR di mana Anwar juga berbohong kepada rakyat bahawa beliau akan berjaya merampas kuasa kerajaan pusat dan seterusnya menjadi PM pada 16 September 2008.

“Taktik ini adalah untuk menambat hat i ahl i -ahl i dan menipu rakyat. Memandangkan keadaan sekarang, PR tidak mungkin dapat merampas kuasa di N.Sembilan.”

Sdr Chang juga berkata, rakyat sekarang beria- ia dengan sistem dualisme. Ini merupakan faktor Pakatan

mendapat peluang pada 8 Mac 2008. Sehubungan itu, beliau menyeru parti komponen BN mestilah bersatu hati, merancang strategi jangka panjang , dan berubah supaya mendapat sokongan rakyat semula.

B e l i a u j u g a b e r h a r a p r a k y a t menyokong konsep “1Malaysia” yang disarankan oleh Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

“Sejajar dengan perubahan ini , d i h a r a p a g e n s i k e r a j a a n d a p a t mengurus pentadbirannya dengan adil dan saksama,agar rakyat dapat merasai kejujuran kerajaan untuk membawa perubahan.”

Gerakan Negeri Sembilan bersiap sedia menghadapi pilihanraya, kata Sdr Chang

森州民政党成立大选委员会，全体同

志进入备战状态，随时迎战下届大选！

民政党森美兰州联委会主席郑启宗同

志透露，他说自去年大选后，森美兰州

联委会也成立大选委员会，预先鉴定下

届大选候选人，这些准候选人及国阵县

市议员就一直在民间积极走动，与选民

保持良好密切关系，并也深入的去了解

及解决地方上的民生问题，重新塑造国

阵的新形象及品牌，以在来届大选获得

选民的支持。

对于民联矢言要在來屆大选夺取森州

的执政权，他认为,这个只是民联的政

治口号，就像安华两年前的916变天谎

言，或下届大选打入中央执政，当首相

一样，只是一场政治手段，目的是为了

欺骗选民，拉拢党员的忠心。

“其实照目前的情势来看，民联要成

功夺取森州的机率并不高。＂

询及我国的新政局，他说经过上届

308大选的洗礼，我国选民已趋向两线

制的选择。在308大选时，让民联趁虚

而入，这也是在国阵执政半世纪，面对

的最严峻的考验。

不过他吁请国阵成员党必须认清政治

现实，有鉴于此，各成员党必须联手一

致，作出长远性的策略调整与改变，以

挽回民心。

他也希望国人支持及配合首相纳吉的

“一个马来西亚＂概念，通过这项改革

持续进行，确保各政府机关在执行政策

时，公平合理对待全民，让各族感受到

政府的改革诚意。

鄭啟宗：森美蘭信心滿滿

迎來届大選！

Temuramah dengan Pengerusi N. Sembilan Sdr Chang Khee Choong


mattr1819aa.indd 3 4/21/2010 2:02:33 AM

Kota Kinabalu. Gerakan Sabah’s Chairman, Datuk Gordon Leong led a delegation of 20 youth members participated in the blood donation campaign organized by Taiwan Tzu Chi in Likas on 14th March 2010. However, only 15 of them qualified to donate at this campaign. Sdr. Tan Wen Gio bleeding for a good course.



活動報報看Activities

DATE EVENTS2/2/ 2010 Round tab le D iscuss ion on

Subsidy: Getting the System Right.

14/2/2010 Gerakan Chinese New Year Open House 2010.

3 /3/ 2010 C e n t r a l E c o n o m i c B u r e a u meeting with the Unit Head of Malaysia Pig Farmer Association.

12/3/ 2010 C e n t r a l E c o n o m i c B u r e a u organized and took par t in the dialogue between Chief secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Vegetable Grower Association of Malaysia.

26/3/2010 PGRM SME Bureau visits Dev Terengganu.

Date Events8/2/2010 BN Wanita National Meeting

attended by Sdri Tan Lian Hoe, Sdri Jayanthi Devi Balaguru and Sdri Cheong Mun Moy and a visit to Sungai Way.

14/2/2010 Wanita and Pemuda jointly organized the PGRM Chinese New Year Open House.Wanita and Pemuda jointly organized the PGRM Chinese New Year Open House.

27/2/2010 Wani ta Nat ional members attended the Chinese New Year Open House organized by Wanita Ledang Division. Attended by Menteri Besar of Johor.

5/3/2010 Invitation to form Puteri BN. Sdri Janice Law represented Gerakan Beliawanis attended the meeting. Wanita Gerakan gave feedback and suggestion t h a t t h e A J K B N P u t e r i be sha red among a l l t he component parties.

8/3/2010 Wanita Gerakan supported the 90 Days Maternity Leave Campaign in Conjunction with International Women’s Day organized by NUBE.

13/3/2010 Wanita National Committee meeting was held in Negeri Sembilan.

16/3/2010 Memorandum – Recognizing the Party’s Constitution was submitted to President by the Wanita Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia.

Activities Calendar 活动表

Activities Calendar WANITA GERAKAN 活动表

龍騰虎躍迎新春民政團拜歡滿堂Gerakan Celebrating Chinese New Year Open House 2010

Melaka

Sabah

A gotong royong activity in DUN Bachang by JKKB Malim and Ahli Majlis Hang Tuah Jaya

Gerakan Melaka State together with JKKB Malim Committees posing for a group photograph after presenting hampers and red packet to 220 Elderly Citizens in DUN Bachang during the 2010 CNY celebration.

Gerakan Melaka presenting a cheque as a contribution to the newly formed ‘Kumpulan Kompang Taman Pasir Putih’ in DUN Bachang by UMNO Youth Pasir Putih to purchase kompangs.

Kota Kinabalu. Gerakan Sabah Open House at Grand Ballroom STAR. The Chief Minister of Sabah and invitees performing ‘Lau Sang’.

12/3: Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Dalam Negeri = ..

HQ

HQ

Perak Sabah


mattr2021.indd 2 4/21/2010 2:07:20 AM

Kota Kinabalu. Gerakan Sabah’s Chairman, Datuk Gordon Leong led a delegation of 20 youth members participated in the blood donation campaign organized by Taiwan Tzu Chi in Likas on 14th March 2010. However, only 15 of them qualifi ed to donate at this campaign. Sdr. Tan Wen Gio bleeding for a good course.

uncivilized political cultureDATE EVENTS2/2/ 2010 Round tab le D iscuss ion on

Subsidy: Getting the System Right.

14/2/2010 Gerakan Chinese New Year Open House 2010.

3 /3/ 2010 C e n t r a l E c o n o m i c B u r e a u meeting with the Unit Head of Malaysia Pig Farmer Association.

12/3/ 2010 C e n t r a l E c o n o m i c B u r e a u organized and took par t in the dialogue between Chief secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Vegetable Grower Association of Malaysia.

15-19/32010

ACCCIM Trade and Investment Mission to Myanmar at Yangon.

17/3/2010 Lahore Chamber of Commerce & Industry Business Matching with 35 businesses from Pakistan.

26/3/2010 PGRM SME Bureau visits Dev Terengganu.

Melaka Perak

Sabah

A gotong royong activity in DUN Bachang by JKKB Malim and Ahli Majlis Hang Tuah Jaya

Gerakan Melaka State together with JKKB Malim Committees posing for a group photograph after presenting hampers and red packet to 220 Elderly Citizens in DUN Bachang during the 2010 CNY celebration.

Gerakan Melaka presenting a cheque as a contribution to the newly formed ‘Kumpulan Kompang Taman Pasir Putih’ in DUN Bachang by UMNO Youth Pasir Putih to purchase kompangs.

Chang Ko Youn handed over the land title documents to the Sungai Siput farmers

Sdr Chang Ko Youn attending “How to be A Smart Consumer” Talk.

Celebrating Chinese New Year.

Kota Kinabalu. Gerakan Sabah Open House at Grand Ballroom STAR. The Chief Minister of Sabah and invitees performing ‘Lau Sang’.

Papar : Gerakan Sabah Youth Movemen t dona ted bu i l d i ng material to families of Mr. Loidin Mudahan and Mr. Ephen Matajim in Kg. Sabindil, Papar, whereby their houses were razed down during the pre-dawn fire. The building material was handled over to the affected families Sdr. Alexander Chee and being witnessed by Sdr. Chang Shui Kiong and Sdr. Norbert Chin in early February.

Kota Kinabalu,Sandakan. Members of Gerakan National SME Development Bureau led by Tan Sri Dato’ Soong Siew Hoong and Sabah SME Bureau Chairman, Sdr. Wong Choon Seng has made a factory visit in Sandakan. The delegation also consisted of state and national youth leaders. The visit was hosted by Mr. Yap Kok Ming, President of Sabah FEIA.

12/3: Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Dalam Negeri = ..




新生代空間Pemuda

(Kuala Lumpur)Gerakan Youth today submitted a memorandum containing five proposals to the government to improve BTN (Biro Tata Negara) programmes to be in line with the spirit of 1Malaysia. Youth chief Lim Si Pin handed over the memorandum to the Prime Minister ’s Special Officer Mr Ravin Ponniah at the Prime Minister’s Department in Putrajaya. Also present was Youth Secretary-General Dr Dominic Lau.

Gerakan Youth has suggested five ways, including forming a special working committee to re-evaluate the format and content of the courses, to improve the Biro Tata Negara ( BTN ) programmes to be in-

line with the spirit of 1Malaysia.Gerakan Youth has proposed the special

working committee should be headed by the chief secretary to the government and comprises other high ranking government offi cers and academicians from the various races and backgrounds.

T h e o t h e r s u g g e s t i o n s i n t h e memorandum include hiring more non-Malay lecturers and BTN officers to bring the courses in line with the 1Malaysia concept; and ensuring that the contents of the BTN courses are based on the Federal Constitution, Rukun Negara, Wawasan 2020, Visi Negara and 1Malaysia.

Gerakan Youth also suggest that BTN

should be renamed as Biro1Malaysia to suit Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib (Abdul Razak’s) wishes to uphold the spirit and the values of 1Malaysia.

Source: Klik4Malaysia.com 2010.03.09

（吉隆坡）民青團總團長林時彬與總秘書劉華才博士，今日（週二，3月9日）前往布城呈交備忘錄，提5大建議改進國家幹訓局，由首相特別助理拉溫博尼爾接領。

林時彬指出，國家幹訓局肩負著團結全民的重大責任，但是當局近期頻頻被人投訴有乖離了原先設立的宗旨，被部份偏激種族主義講師利用來灌輸極端的種族主義思想，這是令人遺憾的。

“自國家幹訓局遭人投訴說出現弊病起，民青團就非常關注這課題，皆因這課題攸

關人民的團結，尤其是青年，所以各界都不可對此事掉以輕心。＂他也透露，民青團過去數次通過媒體，一而再的表明在這課題的立場及呼吁政府必須徹底改革國家幹訓局，恢復其本來的宗旨。

“週二，我們把我們的聲音化為具體行動，呈交備忘錄予首相，提出5大建議，以履行青年對建國的責任。＂

林時彬指出，在備忘錄中，民青團建議政府成立一個以政府首席秘書長為首，成員涵蓋了相關政府高官和各族的學術界及

文化界代表的特別工作委員會，檢討國家幹訓局的課程與呈現模式。此外，國家幹訓局的講師與管理層也應該來自各種族，這才能體現“一個馬來西亞＂的精神與本色。

他也說，國家干訓局的形象有必要更新，因此民青團建議用“一個大馬局＂來取代國家幹訓局，這樣不但符合了首相提倡的一個馬來西亞的精神和價值觀外，也能給人全新的感覺。

摘自：星洲日報 2010.03.09

民青團坐言起行備忘錄呈首相 5大建議改進幹訓局

line with the spirit of 1Malaysia.line with the spirit of 1Malaysia. should be renamed as Biro1Malaysia to should be renamed as Biro1Malaysia to

Gerakan Youthwalked the talk!

“Green Offi ce” TalkSMI/SME Forum, Sungai Siput, Perak

Interstate Debate Competition( P e m u d a N e g e r i Sembilan VS Pemuda P.Pinang)

Media Visit ( P e m u d a N e g e r i ( P e m u d a N e g e r i Sembilan VS Pemuda Sembilan VS Pemuda ( P e m u d a N e g e r i Sembilan VS Pemuda ( P e m u d a N e g e r i ( P e m u d a N e g e r i Sembilan VS Pemuda ( P e m u d a N e g e r i Sembilan VS Pemuda P.Pinang)P.Pinang)

（吉隆坡）民青團總團長林時彬與總秘書劉華才博士，今日（週二，3月9日）前往布城呈交備忘錄，提5大建議改進國家幹訓局，由首相特別助理拉溫博尼爾接領。

林時彬指出，國家幹訓局肩負著團結全民的重大責任，但是當局近期頻頻被人投訴有乖離了原先設立的宗旨，被部份偏激種族主義講師利用來灌輸極端的種族主義思想，這是令人遺憾的。

“自國家幹訓局遭人投訴說出現弊病起，民青團就非常關注這課題，皆因這課題攸

關人民的團結，尤其是青年，所以各界都不可對此事掉以輕心。＂他也透露，民青團過去數次通過媒體，一而再的表明在這課題的立場及呼吁政府必須徹底改革國家幹訓局，恢復其本來的宗旨。

“週二，我們把我們的聲音化為具體行動，呈交備忘錄予首相，提出5大建議，以履行青年對建國的責任。＂

林時彬指出，在備忘錄中，民青團建議政府成立一個以政府首席秘書長為首，成員涵蓋了相關政府高官和各族的學術界及

文化界代表的特別工作委員會，檢討國家幹訓局的課程與呈現模式。此外，國家幹訓局的講師與管理層也應該來自各種族，這才能體現“一個馬來西亞＂的精神與本色。

他也說，國家干訓局的形象有必要更新，因此民青團建議用“一個大馬局＂來取代國家幹訓局，這樣不但符合了首相提倡的一個馬來西亞的精神和價值觀外，也能給人全新的感覺。

摘自：星洲日報 2010.03.09












Liew was floored to the ground by Teng who came with facts and figures. Liew






environmental protection and Penang became the first state in Peninsular Malaysia, to have two state parks, as well as a National Park.In his usual hard-hitting, no nonsense address, Teng put forth his arguments in a frank and direct way.





t find any specific funding allocated for schools. So, I can only presume that such allocations announced by PR state government are included in the expenditure under the Chief Minister and State Secretary Office. So, how can the PR government call the allocation “institutional funds”? This is nothing new. Theirs is just a continuation of what the previous BN administration had been doing.”





2010Pemuda Activities Report

January

• Perak Youth VS Sabah Youth in Sabah• WPKL Youth VS Johor Youth• Kedah Youth VS Selangor Youth• Kelantan Youth VS Pahang Youth

Jan - March

9 Sdr Lim Si Pin, Sdr Liang Teck Meng, Sdr Ong Khang Woon and Sdr Dr Dominic Lau attended Johor Youth SLC meeting in Johor.

11 Sdr Dr Dominic Lau interviewed by AI fm on KPI issue.21 Sdr Lim Si Pin, Sdr Dr Dominic Lau and Sdr Andy Yong

attended Melaka and Negeri Sembilan Youth SLC Meeting.

26 Sdr Lim Si Pin interviewed by TV 3.27 Sdr Dr Dominic Lau interviewed by NTV 7.29 Sdr Dr Dominic represented Pemuda National to attend

Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia’s Thaipusam chariot procession in Jalan Ipoh.

February 7 SMI/SME Talk organized by Pemuda National jointly

with Perak Youth and Sungai Siput Utara in Sungai Sipit. Officiated by Sdr Dato Chang Ko Youn, Deputy President National PGRM.

14 Pemuda & Beliawanis co organized Chinese New Year Open House 2010 at PGRM HQ, Dewan Wawasan.

21 Sdr Lim Si Pin, National Youth Chairman held Chinese New Year Open House in his Batu Constituency and attended by the main body, Pemuda and Wanita CC members at HGH Convention Centre, Sentul.

22 Sdr Lim Si Pin. Sdr David Ang, Sdr Dr Dominic Lau and Sdr Lim Keh Ho attended MCA Youth Chinese New Year Open House.

24 Pemuda National visited Nanyang Siang Pau.25 Pemuda National visited Oriental Daily.26 Sdr Dr Dominic Lau attended Chinese New Year

Open House organized by 8 Major Chinese Youth Organizations.

March3 Pemuda National Visited Sin Chew Daily.4 Pemuda National Visited China Press.9 Sdr Lim Si Pin and Sdr Dr Dominic Lau

handed over a memorandum on the BTN issue from National Youth PGRM to the Prime Minister ‘s Department .

13 Pemuda Nat ional and the Tzu Chi Association organized a “Green Office Talk” officiated by Sdr Dato’ Mah Siew Keong, Vice President PGRM.

13 Pemuda National 9th CC Meeting at 2pm in PGRM HQ.

20 Interstate Debate competition between Negeri Sembilan Youth and Penang Youth in Negeri Sembilan.

3 Pemuda National Visited Sin Chew Daily.4 Pemuda National Visited China Press.9 Sdr Lim Si Pin and Sdr Dr Dominic Lau

handed over a memorandum on the BTN issue from National Youth PGRM to the Prime Minister ‘s Department .

13 Pemuda Nat ional and the Tzu Chi Association organized a “Green Office Talk” officiated by Sdr Dato’ Mah Siew Keong, Vice President PGRM.

13 Pemuda National 9th CC Meeting at 2pm in PGRM HQ.

20 Interstate Debate competition between Negeri Sembilan Youth and Penang Youth in Negeri Sembilan.

Upcoming Activity Interstate Debate Competition

Thaipusam 2010

Sdr Lim SI Pin’s Batu Division Chinese New Year Open House

MCA Youth Chinese New Year Open House 2010




G主張says

Our Stand 我們的主張

Urged all Malaysians to participate in the effort to tackle climate change and fight global warming, which is harming our environment.

“ Gerakan is committed to Green Agenda and will work closely with non-government organisations to initiate the green concrete action to achieve tangible results.

~Sdr Koh Tsu Koon~

民政党参与这个“地球一小时＂行动也是符合了该党朝向“绿党＂议程的努力方向。除此之外，民政党也会与环保组织保持紧密的关系，希望能够一起打造一个绿色大马。

“ 地球暖化情况已日趋严重，而抗暖的动作是需要全球人类一起参与，这样才能达到保护我们的大地之母。我希望大马人民在这方面能够不分彼此，一起努力抗暖和环保！＂

~许子根同志~

26/3/2010

On Earth Hour

Urged the government to undertake aggressive and effective national road shows to educate and explain the Goods and Service Tax (GST) immediately. And government should look into the timing of the official introduction of the GST.

“ In order to convince and win over the people’s support for the intro-duction of GST, the government must ensure two things: First, putting in place a more simplified, efficient and transparent business-friendly tax collection mechanism; and secondly, stop revenue leakages and wastage by spending the GST collection on improving the public transportation.

~Sdr Mah Siew Keong ~

敦促政府立即展开积极和有效的全国巡回展览，以讲解及宣传即将实行的消费税细节，也认为政府应该探讨适合的日期才正式实行消费税。

“ 为了让民众对即将实行消费税的措施有所信服，政府必须确保两个事项：第一，拟定一套简单、有效和透明度，且方便营商的征收税务管理机制；第二，防止税收流失和浪费，消费税收入应用来改善公共交通，教育和医疗保健。

~马袖强同志~

30/1/2010On GST

Welcomed the government’s decision to allow the return of speakers corners in public universities, saying “it is a vote of confidence in our undergraduates’ maturity, ac-countability and confidence.” Added our undergraduates must be allowed to voice their ideas, views and vision freely but responsibly.

“ It is a great step to cultivate entrepreneur, creative and innovative spirit amongst our future generation. Youths, especially college and university students, should be allowed to talk on subjects concerning the society at large, so as to widen their scope of knowledge.

~Sdr Lim Si Pin~

欢迎政府允许我国大专重新设立“言论角落＂的决定，并称这是政府对大专生的成熟度、责任感及信心投了强而有力的信任票。

“ 言论角落＂会是一个让学生针对各项课题发表本身看法的最佳平台，这也将有助栽培我国下一代勇于开拓新视野、创意及革新能力与精神。我们应该允许年轻人尤其是大专生自由，但负责任的抒发他们对社会各项课题的看法，进而扩大他们的视野。

~林时彬同志~

15/1/2010

On Speaker’s Corner

8/1/2010

On The fire-bombed attack on three churches

Said the government should seek a commitment from all parties in-volved, including religious scholars and experts, and find a solution to the issue as quickly as possible.

“ We are disappointed that some people have become too emotional and used the Allah issue to commit violent acts. We urge the government to take quick action to nab the culprits involved.

~Sdr Chang Ko Youn ~

阿拉字眼风波升级为暴力事件，这是令人感到失望，为此政府务必加速寻策解决，与当局、宗教界学者及专家共同寻出一个都被接受的方案，以免我国长久以来的宗教和睦遭到破坏。

“ 宗教一直都是敏感课题，因此更需要谨慎的处理，当局者应该顾及其他人的看法与感受，这才是我们需要秉持的态度。

~郑可扬同志~


mattr2425.indd 2 4/21/2010 2:13:35 AM


Our Stand 我們的主張

Said the Human Resources Ministry should have more holis-tic approach to help job-seekers secure employment, govern-ment should address the mismatch between market and our graduates.

“ Hopes the ministry would work together with other minis-tries to address the perennial problem of marketability of our graduates.

~Sdr Ng Keong Chye ~呼吁人力资源部应该寻求更全面及完善的方法，而不是仅开办大马就业中心，来协助求职者找到合适的工作。政府应迅速解决我国教育体系结构的缺陷，以便我国的大学毕业生或中学毕业生在离校后，都具备了必要的知识和技巧，更重要的是培育他们正确的处事与工作态度和信心。

“ 虽然我们同意在全国开设越多的大马就业中心帮助求职者，但我们更希望该部将与其他政府部门合作，共同解决我国毕业生长期面对就业的问题。

~黄恭才同志~

22/3/2010

On JobsMalaysia centres

Said efficient energy usage meant using less energy to provide the same level of energy service.

“ This move (stopping the use of traditional light bulbs by Janu-ary 2014) by the government to save power may not be a ma-jor step but it is a good initiative to reduce energy,” he said in a statement, adding that energy efficiency had proved to be a cost-effective strategy for building economies.

~Sdr Cheah Soon Hai~指出节能的意思是使用更少的能源，也能达到一般的能源水平。

“ 政府这项决定（政府决定在2014年1月开始停止使用传统灯泡）可能对节能来说不是一个重大步骤，但它确实是一个大推动力。而且节能的效益已证明是经济成本建设的有效战略。

~谢顺海同志~

19/3/2010

On energy-saving

Said it was better to have more consultations and discussions with the Orang Asli before the proposed amendments to the Orang Asli Act 1954 were tabled in Parliament in June.

“ Every community has a niche in Malaysia and it is only fair and just to have their say on issues affecting the respective community

~Sdr Asharuddin~

表示在1954年原住民法令未被修正之前，政府需事先与原住民作出协商。有关修正案预定在今年6月提呈给国会通过。

“ 在马来西亚，每个社群都应该获得良好的安置，因此唯有听取受影响者的意愿后才执行政策，才是最公平及合理的政策。

~阿沙鲁汀同志~

18/3/2010

On Orang Asli Act

Said the implementation on sex education should be carried out in phases in secondary schools first and then primary schools.

“ Teachers should be given adequate and proper training before the policy is implemented. Besides teachers, parents also have an impor-tant role to see to it that their children have the right knowledge on sex.

~Sdri Ng Siew Lai ~

呼吁教育部在落实此项政策时，应该采取渐进的方式，分阶段的进行。性教育的其中课程纲要，是应该让学生必须对自己的生理结构了解、让学生知道偷吃禁果后所面对的风险与问题、被人性侵犯后如何处理等。

“ 教师的专业培训是性教育的首决条件，例如从生命科学角度来教导这项教育，否则将让性教育课程带来负面影响。此外，家长也是有必要了解如何教导孩子这方面的教育，与学校互相配合，如此一来，才不会灌输错误的知识。

~吴秀丽同志~

15/3/2010

On Sex Education

Hoped the government will walk the talk to ensure that government scholarships are given based on merits, irrespective of race or “who you know”. The implementation of the policy should be transparent, especially the selection criteria, should be strictly adhered to by the relevant authorities.

“ The subjectivity and ambiguity in the scoring of non-academic criteria like co-curriculum, background, interview performance etc must be reduced to uphold transparency and accountability.

~Sdr Lau Chin Hoon ~

期望政府坐言起行，在奖学金遴选制度上是以绩效作为准绳，并不分种族或基于“认识谁？＂。只有实行更加公平和透明的制度，才能鼓励更多的大学毕业生返回大马为自己的国家服务。

“ 非学术的条件如课外活动、背景、申请者面试表现等，这些都必须简化以确保透明度及责任度。

~刘清分同志~

24/3/2010

On National Scholarship

8/1/2010

The fire-bombed attack on three churches


mattr2425.indd 3 4/21/2010 2:14:28 AM


總部職員陣容HQ Staff line up

Aini B Asa’at Office Assistant (Administration)

Chan Yook Mooi Executive Secretary (Membership)

Gideon Chiong Executive Secretary (Economic Bureau/ Education Bureau/ SME Devp. Unit)

Chong Sim FoongCatherineExecutive Secretary ( W o m e n W i n g / P u b l i c H e a l t h & Social Devp.)

Chow Yuan Keong RaymondGeneral Clerk (Membership)

Joseph Solomon Dorai Executive Secretary (LifeMember Council)

K. Kalanithi Officer (MembershipMembership Card)

K. Valiyammai Officer (MembershipNew Application)

Liew Pah Mooi Officer(ROS, Administration)

Loh Choon Yin Executive Secretary (Finance/Personnel/Alex Lee Award/TELS)

Loo Yim Ping Executive Secretary (Administration/Training Bureau)

Low Sheut ThengAssistant Executive Secretary(Account/ Alex Lee Award/ ELS GovernAdministrationAffairs Bureau)

Low Wai KuenAssistant Executive Secretary (Administration/TELS/Human Right &Law Bureau/National Unity)

ManimaranExecutive Secretary(Youth Wing /Environment Bureau/Publicity Bureau)

Ooi Seok TingKatherine Deputy Chief Administrator CumExecutive Secretary (Administration/IT/Political Bureau/International Relation Unit)

Wong Yuen MoiClerk (Membership-Subscription & Transfer)

Yong Ah Ying Tea Lady (Administration)


Gerakan Representatives in Government

Name: Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu KoonDesignation: National President 姓名：丹斯里许子根博士党职：全国主席

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (National Unity and Performance Management)首相署部长（团结事务及绩效管理）

Tanjung Papat, Sabah沙巴山打根丹绒巴拔区Name: Datuk Raymond Tan Shu KiahDesignation:National Vice President姓名：拿督陈树杰党职：全国副主席

Sabah Infrastructure Development Minister沙巴企业发展部部长

Gerik ,Perak 霹雳宜力区Name: Dato’ Tan Lian HoeDesignation:National Vice President and Wanita Chief姓名：拿督陈莲花党职：全国副主席兼妇女组主席

Deputy Minister of Domestic Trade, Co-operatives And Consumerism 国内贸易、合作社及消费部副部长 Name: A Kohilan Pillay

Designation:National Vice President姓名：柯希南党职：全国副主席

Deputy Foreign Affairs Ministers Senator外交部副部长

Member of Parliament 国會議員

Simpang Renggam ,Johor 柔佛新邦令金区Name: Liang Teck Meng姓名：梁德明党职：民青团全国副主席

Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri 州議員

Derga ,Kedah

吉打德卡区

Name: Dr. Cheah Soon Hai

姓名：谢顺海医生

Ketari , Pahang

彭亨吉打里区

Name: Dr. Ng Keong Chye

姓名：黄恭才医生

Tanah Rata ,Pahang

彭亨丹那拉打区

Name: Ho Yip Kap

姓名：何业嘉

Pemanis , Johor

柔佛柏马尼斯区

Name: Lau Chin Hoon

姓名：刘清分

Bukit Batu , Johor

柔佛武吉巴都区

Name: Cheong Chin Liang

姓名：张震亮

Elopura , Sabah

沙巴依罗普拉区

Name: Au Kam Wah

姓名：区锦华

State Exco 州行政議員

27.indd 1 4/21/2010 11:01:20 AM

8

2

9

1Kestabilan Politik Parti Gerakan adalah komited dalam mengekalkan Sistem Raja Berperlembagaan dan Demokrasi.

Pendirian Ideologi Parti Gerakan atas Pelbagai IsuPendirian Ideologi Parti Gerakan atas Pelbagai Isu

1Berperlembagaan dan Demokrasi.

Hak Asasi ManusiaParti Gerakan adalah komited terhadap perlindungan dan pengembangan hak-hak asasi manusia dan kebebasan asasi seperti yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan Ma-laysia, Piagam Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (Bab 10, Artikel 62) dan Deklarasi Sejagat Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia 1948.1948.

3Kebebasan untuk Merealisasikan Potensi IndividuParti Gerakan percaya kepada liberalisasi, pendemokrasian dan penswastaan yang berterusan dalam bidang pendidikan, khususnya pada peringkat pengajian tinggi, tetapi juga ber-pendirian bahawa usaha kerajaan dalam bidang ini tidak patut dikurangkan.dikurangkan.

4Kepercayaan kepada Sistem Pasaran Bebas tetapi dengan perlindungan kerajaan terhadap rakyat yang miskinParti Gerakan berpendapat bahawa mekanisme pasaran bebas masih merupakan alat yang paling berkesan dalam pengagihan sumber kekayaan. Akan tetapi, pasaran dan kerajaan masing-masing mempunyai peranan yang saling membantu dan memperkasa sesama sendiri. Penekanan haruslah kepada pem-bangunan suatu pasaran yang mesra rakyat di mana pasaran berkhidmat kepada rakyat dan bukan sebaliknya.berkhidmat kepada rakyat dan bukan sebaliknya.

6

5

7Peranan Wanita dalam Pembangunan NegaraParti Gerakan akan mengambil segala langkah yang wajar un-tuk memastikan kemajuan dan pembangunan yang menyeluruh bagi semua kaum wanita di Malaysia, agar menjamin mereka dapat menggunakan hak serta mengecapi faedah hak asasi manusia dan kebebasan asasi atas dasar kesamarataan dengan kaum lelaki di Malaysia.kaum lelaki di Malaysia.

Integrasi BudayaParti Gerakan berpegang teguh kepada pendiriannya terdahulu sebagaimana yang termaktub dalam Memorandumnya berke-naan dengan Kebudayaan yang mana nilai-nilai dan kepercay-aan adalah lebih mustahak daripada bentuk atau format. Parti Gerakan percaya bahawa kaedah dan pendekatan yang terbaik dalam isu kebudayaan adalah mengenal pasti nilai-nilai asas yang sama dalam kebudayaan semua kaum sambil membenar-kan kepelbagaian bentuk kebudayaan berbilang kaum.

Menentang Budaya Politik WangParti Gerakan menentang politik wang untuk menghindari kro-nisme, penyimpangan dalam pelaksanaan dasar, masalah ra-suah dan pengongkongan semangat perusahaan. Parti Gerakan berpendirian teguh bahawa politik tidak boleh diperniagakan.

Perlindungan Alam SekitarParti Gerakan berpegang teguh kepada konsep pembangunan mampan. Dasar-dasar yang dilaksanakan oleh sektor kerajaan dan swasta mestilah mesra alam sekitar.6dan swasta mestilah mesra alam sekitar.6dan swasta mestilah mesra alam sekitar.6

¿£Êò¾ ¿¢¨ÄÂ¡É ÅÇ÷îº¢ìÌ ¦¸Ã¡ì¸¡ý ¸ðº¢ ¾ÉÐ Àí¸Ç¢ô¨À

ÅÆíÌ¸¢ÈÐ. «Ãº¡í¸ò Ð¨ÈÔõ ¾É¢Â¡÷ Ð¨ÈÔõ §Áü¦¸¡ûÙõ

¦¸¡û¨¸

¾¢ð¼í¸û «Åº¢Âõ ÍüÚÝÆÖìÌ À¡¾¢ôÒ ²üÀÎò¾¡¾ Å¨¸Â¢ø þÕì¸

§ÅñÎõ.



¦¸¡û¨¸


§ÅñÎõ.



¦¸¡û¨¸


§ÅñÎõ.



¦¸¡û¨¸


§ÅñÎõ.



¦¸¡û¨¸


§ÅñÎõ.

Masyarakat yang Adil dan SaksamaParti Gerakan adalah komited dalam membentuk sebuah ma-syarakat yang adil dan saksama. Ini adalah untuk memastikan hasil pembangunan pada bila-bila masa sekalipun tidak akan hanya dikuasai oleh golongan minoriti sedangkan golongan majoriti ketinggalan dalam penderitaan miskin papa. majoriti ketinggalan dalam penderitaan miskin papa.

gm jan mac2010

Documents