grazzini-rucki v knutson feb 18 letter ecf 43-1 13-cv-02477 michelle macdonald minnesota

8/12/2019 Grazzini-Rucki v Knutson Feb 18 Letter ECF 43-1 13-CV-02477 Michelle MacDonald Minnesota

1/3

CASE 0:13-cv-02477-SRN-JSM Document 43-1 Filed 04/03/14 Page 1 of 3

F 18 2014

udge Su an R chard Ne sWa!en E Burge F d ra Bui d g

d U S. C urth u e31 N rth R Str tSt Pau Mi ta55101

: Sa r Gr zz ni-Ruck , e al v a L K a ;C u File V 77(SRN/JSM

D ar Judge Ne n

Ma ng& DI

S r S\Y S P ul, MNM 222-

Fa: 222 2

I a writing eha f f ai ti i the a ve att r and in c uncti wy ur c r Lynn H de n Ja uary 27 2014a e i quiri g a t upp e ting the rec

D nda t s ti n t di i u udg ent are a ed n the c a fi u i i s. F wing the Janua10 ti , De nda t's att ey ethea uyse p vid d add ti na vid ce f a c ear a s nce f urisdicti n a wA davit of DavidK1 /s , wh re e attach d artia tra cri t f the c d cu dy tria prev

Th sig cance that De nda t w a davit ad it t ve a ean ra warra t r search and sei re f P ainti s att ey's ca era a d phn uch thi g a an ra warrant i g r can uri prud c adv 4 tha e d ent t the M e ta a d Federa C n tit ti n Thi is a c

h ri , a d th a davit a d tran cri t i n w avai a r y ur r vi w

N urisdicti eans i unities here is unity r such n udicHoppe v. Klapper ch 224Mi . 224 (1947)

The ew evid nce c n that the tria that c nc ud d n S t2 wa t a udiciaact ut acts u d r c aw, r ating the18 USC198 civi ghts acti .

I additi De nda t has pr vide additi a ev de ce f i pr per a sigu i g f c t s y De da t t add t the f avit in u rt f dt di i s

W are r qu ti g t su e e t the rec rd w th i ant new evid ce ac ( ) a ence f uri di i , a d n udicia act i r qu sting tha

oi.D1 the M ti t Dis iss y the tip f the iceberg as disc very has t ee a) e di g di p itiv ti

: e' lt n t

u J: Saint P ul & S b bs+ 06So R be S r tt W S Paul,MN 55 8+ O e (65 0A" ' Mim1eapol s & S bu rbs + 3 Edinborough Way-Suite 550 + Edin ,M N 55435 + Of ce: (952) 746-42 3. \CJ N m S II wa e ' & S 1 O gs6351 C ix Tr l+ S i hv .M 5508 + O ce 651) 45555 9


2/3


And below there is more e idence that the September5 phone all, resultant September 7 20 2order the trial that oncluded on September2 20 and the ustody o der of No ember 25 ( led rst as an a tached to the motion to dis iss here) were not judicbut acts without jurisdiction under color of law relating the8 983civil rights a tion

We are w ting this letter to requests a motion to supplement the reco d with i oe idence keeping in nd that this isw houbene t of dis overy because De ndanti ediately led a mot on to dismiss/summa1 judgment:

. Additional evidence of improper assignments, and the usu ing of co les is a Noti e, dated une 28 20 No judicial o cer assigned" This an be added toa davits in s pport of denying the motion to dismiss t is more idenusur ing ou les which signies no jurisdi tion or im unity

2 addition on January 24 20 4De ndant t ough is a o ey Ale hea Huy p ovidedan f davit of Da id Knutson along with a partial t ansc pt f thcustody trial, September2 20 3 See De ndant s A da it, attac ng trans ripPlainti has repeatedly requested the transcripts w ch has not been provhereto re.

The De ndant Da id nutson s swo A da it is sig i ant as to the ab jurisdiction and e idence of non udicial a Vor admi strati e acts, r wis no judicial i m uni y De ndant states he pro ided verbal permission and seizure, ontra y toHoppe, as ited in our Memo ndum

4 The A da it, and trans ripts, con rm De ndant s role in the a est of Plaat o ey which he cla ns no responsibility r and h s role in demandiobje tion the child custody t ia ontinue, even though hildren are missinis absent and Mother s a to ey is under arrest and in the jurisdiction of deputies

5 T is onduct a ot possibly be onsidered judicial acts r which there is

6. The hild stody order gene ate d a er the custody trial No ember 25 was rstattached to the De ndant's A da it in support of is motion to dismiss N 2 There s m re e iden e the custody order was generated to use as an Exthe de se of the deral lawsuit against De ndant, and not r proper pu

The Depu y Sheri s Gonder and Melton testi ed on Janua 2 20 4andon med the De ndant's v rbal p rmiss on to search the camera/phone

De ndant e of the Plain i s a o ey s ond tion ie andcuDe ndant verbally ordered sheri s, re n her to omplete the chi d usto


3/3


l so id li , d w houtPl int 'Thele t mo y of depuli r t sD dant, a dis a a a p

Du ingt e o anumy ,a torn ey s Ell o oklo a d provid dD dm 'allom y, a H ,w t pnp vork, w cM H se a$ wd c d. s ign ant o e o Sept mb r 5, 201nd ordS tcmb 17 20 w cPla n 'c s ot jud ci ac b a m str v

c ab entj sd ct on.

Ru kic ld a ont e f sh gm d ex lo ed ldr fb of ' s i tl u dy.T e ws n c F g t y

a 01 shopping b g ' rgo,NmthD l . T e cu t f mR kc d av la le fo d ion.

J A s , Def ndant's ori y mguP i i y wx l i lSt tCo ap a a g dU .S re eC I a it W i Cer o ,l Nov m a able e e

A oDefe d ' u m f he J dges r , d o p u d m b l t v bd a

A soD d s o gu C mi l in 10 B a d J d ci lt d , e d a s t of uch o l i tsa labln el a

p eq u t h h sa d ona v d b a n d t u o ndi over d e oDe da pe d gmo on,o b d to eO

grazzini-rucki v knutson feb 18 letter ecf 43-1 13-cv-02477 michelle macdonald minnesota

Documents