healthy campus 2010 midcourse review university mission objectives top 10 health impediments to...

Healthy Campus 2010Midcourse Review

University Mission Objectives

Top 10 Health Impediments to Academic Performance

ACHA-NCHA 2000-2007 Trends and Healthy Campus 2010 Midcourse Review 2

Contents

Percent of Target Achieved Bar Chart for Objectives

Pair of Slides for the Objectives Healthy Campus 2010 Line chart for ethnicities

Data Set Percent of Target Achieved

Calculation


University Learning Mission Objectives

Health Impediments to Academic Performance

Target Setting Method: Better than the best by ethnicity.Target Setting Method: Better than the best by ethnicity.



Health Impediments to Academic Performance

NCHA data: N = ~17,000 to 46,000/yr, HIAP = Health Impediment to Academic Performance

9 away from target 1 toward target


Percent of Targeted Change AchievedLow Grade on exam/project, course, took incomplete/dropped



Percent of Targeted Change AchievedTook Incomplete or Dropped Course




Stress 2000 Baseline: 28.7% 2007: 34.1% 2010 Target: 25%



Cold/Flu/Sore Throat 2000 Baseline: 21.5% 2007: 27.1% 2010 Target: 12%



Sleep Difficulties 2000 Baseline: 20.7% 2007: 26.1% 2010 Target: 16%



Concern for Troubled Family Member/Friend

2000 Baseline: 16.4% 2007: 19% 2010 Target: 12%



Relationship Difficulties 2000 Baseline: 15.1% 2007: 16.4% 2010 Target: 12%



Depression 2000 Baseline: 11.3% 2007: 16.3% 2010 Target: 7.5%



Internet / Computer Games 2000 Baseline: 8.9% 2007: 16.3% 2010 Target: 6%



Death of Family Member / Friend 2000 Baseline: 7.9% 2007: 9.4% 2010 Target: 6%



Sinus Infection / Strep Throat 2000 Baseline: 7.8% 2007: 8.8% 2010 Target: 6%



Alcohol 2000 Baseline: 7.9% 2007: 7.7% 2010 Target: 2.5%


ACHA-NCHA Data Sets

Frequency Percent

Spring 2000 16024 4.6

Spring 2001 16813 4.8

Spring 2002 28258 8.1

Spring 2003 19497 5.6

Spring 2004 47202 13.5

Spring 2005 54111 15.5

Spring 2006 94806 27.2

Spring 2007 71860 20.6

Total 348571 100.0


Percent of Targeted Change Achieved

Calculation (most recent value – baseline )/(2010

target - baseline) Met or exceeded target

100% or greater (positive percent) Movement toward target

>0% to 99% of targeted change Moved away from target

Negative percent (i.e., -60%)

Contact Information

Jim Grizzell, MBA, MA, CHES, ACSM-HFS [email protected], [email protected] (909) 856-3350


healthy campus 2010 midcourse review university mission objectives top 10 health impediments to...

Documents