heavy-ion collisions at rhic ~search for quark gluon plasma~ takao sakaguchi brookhaven national...
TRANSCRIPT
Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC~Search for Quark Gluon Plasma~
Takao SakaguchiBrookhaven National Laboratory
米国ブルックヘブン国立研究所 坂口貴男
Outline of talk•Motivation of Quark Gluon Plasma Search•Accelerator and detectors•Dynamics and Global feature of Heavy ion collisions•Hard scattering as a new probe•Direct Photon, Jet and Heavy Quark results•Summary and Future
Why do we carry out Heavy Ion Collisions?
Why Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP) ?• Believe it or not!
• It existed in the early universe.
• Understanding fundamental QCD problem• Quark confinement• Origin of proton (hadron) Mas
s• Both questions rely on l ow
Q2 region, where s(Q2)>1
• QGP is a phase where bare strong interaction plays significant role• Quarks and gluons are free fr
om hadron “bag”• Study dynamical behavior of s
trongly interacting system
STAR Solenoidal field
Large Solid Angle TrackingTPC’s, Si-Vertex Tracking
RICH, EM Cal, TOF
Measurements of Hadronic observables using a large acceptance spectrometer
Event-by-event analyses of global observables, hadronic spectra and jets
PHENIXAxial Field
High Resolution & Rates2 Central Arms, 2 Forward Arms TEC, RICH, EM Cal, Si, TOF, -ID
Leptons, Photons, and Hadrons in selected solid angles (especially muons)
Simultaneous detection of phase transition phenomena (e– coincidences)
PHOBOS“Table-top” 2 Arm Spectrometer Magnet,
Si -Strips, Si Multiplicity Rings, TOF
Low pt charged hadronsMultiplicity in 4 & Particle Correlations
Ring Counters
Paddle Trigger Counter
Spectrometer
TOF
Octagon+Vertex
BRAHMS2 Spectrometers - fixed target geometryMagnets, Tracking Chambers, TOF, RICH
Inclusive particle production over a large rapidity and pt range
RHIC at BNLLong Island, New York
Run started in 2000. Around 6 months running every year. Statistics aka PHENIX experiment.
Species s1/2 [GeV ] Ldt Ntot (sampled) Data Size
Au+Au 130 1 b-1 10M 3 TB
Au+Au 200 265 b-1 1.8G 120 TB
Au+Au 63 9.1 b-1 58M 4 TB
p+p 200 0.5 pb-1 10G 50 TB
d+Au 200 2.74 nb-1 5.5G 46 TB
Cu+Cu 200 3.06 nb-1 1.1G
Cu+Cu 63 0.16 nb-1
•First Heavy Ion collider•3.83 km circumference•106 ns bunch crossing•Top Energy:
•500 GeV for p+p•200 GeV for Au+Au
•Luminosity•Au+Au: 2 x 1026 cm-2 s-
1
• p+p : 2 x 1032 cm-2 s-1
(polarized)
Time profile of heavy ion collisions
• Gold ions “pass through” each other• Large-x partons fly over.• Mid-rapidity region is full of small-x gluons
• High energy heavy ion collisions = Gluonic matter collisions
• Turns into Gluon plasma
• Gluon -> quark + anti-quark -> QGP
• Cooling QGP -> Mixed phase -> Hadronic stage
• Global Feature• Energy density: 5.7GeV/fm3 @ Au+Au sNN
=200GeV (ref. LQCD: reaches plateau at 2-3GeV/fm3)
• Temperature T=178MeV (Threshold)
Gluon Plasma QGP phase Mixed phase Hadronization + Expansion
P1
P2
x1P1
x2P2
c
d
C
faA (x1) D cC /
fbB (x2) D dD /
td
ijdˆ
X
• Hard scattering process well described by NLO pQCD calculation at high Q2
• Unique Signature at high energy: Hard scattering cross-section is large• Jet and Direct photon• Heavy Quark production: Charm(onium), Bottom(onium)
• Cross section in A+B collisions = TAB(b) p+p collisions• TAB(b): Overlap integral of nuclear profile functions Number of binary collision
s• =AB• Can be calculated by Geometrical description of Nucleus
view along beam axislooking from top
New probe to HEHIC: Hard scattering
In A+B collisions---In A+B collisions---TTABAB Scaling Scaling
Centrality 0% (Central)
Centrality 100% (peripheral)
Proportional to number of participated nucleons
A B
AB
Next-to-Leading Order (NLO)
Leading Order (LO)
Calibrating Hard scattering• High pT Direct photon in Au
+Au at sNN=200GeV• Electromagnetic probes brin
g out information on the stage it is emitted
• Direct access to hard scattering (pT>4GeV/c)
• Yellow bands show error due to three different cut-off scale of NLO pQCD scaled by number of binary collisions (Ncoll)
• NLO pQCD agrees very well with measurement• First measurement of hard s
cattered direct photon in heavy ion collisions! PHENIX, nucl-ex/0503003
Hard scattering cross-section in nucleus-nucleus collisions has been calibrated
X.-N., Wang, PRC 58 (1998)2321
Energy loss =Yield suppress
0 without energy loss
0 with energy loss
Yie
ld [
GeV
-1c]
pT [GeV/c]
coneRFragmentation:
hadron
parton
pz
p
Jet as a probe of dense mediumJet as a probe of dense medium• Parton may change its momentum in hot dense medium
• Energy loss through Gluon radiation, etc.• Reconstruction of Jet in Au+Au is impossible
• Trigger Leading particle of Jet• Angle correlation, Energy, momentum, etc. may reflect Jet kinematics
pT [GeV/c]
0-10% Centrality(Central)
High pT Identified hadron spectra(I)
• Produced in initial hard scattering process•Should scale with Ncoll if no additional process exists
• In peripheral Au+Au collisions, yield is consistent with p+p collisions scaled by Ncoll
• In Central Au+Au collisions, yield is significantly lower than p+p•Energy loss of hard scattered parton in hot and dense medium?
PHENIX, PRL91, 072301 (2003)
70-80% Centrality(peripheral)
pT [GeV/c]
sNN=200GeV
High pT Identified hadron spectra(II)• Nuclear Modification Factor: RAA
• Ratio of per-collision-yield to p+p• Hard scattering only: ratio is 1
• Peripheral Au+Au, Minimum bias d+Au: = 1• Central Au+Au: << 1
• Is suppression due to final state interaction?• Au+Au Direct photon: RAA= 1• Suppression is final state effe
ct• Energy loss of parton
in hot dense medium
• Medium expands in longitudinal direction as well?• Suppression at high rapidity regio
n• Answer is Yes!
pp
AA
AAAA
dpd
T
dpNd
R
3
3
3
3
200
GeV
0
R AA /R
dA
d+Au Minimum bias
Au+Au Peripheral
Au+Au CentralBRAHMS, PRL91, 072305 (2003)
PHENIX, PRL91, 072301 (2003) PHENIX, PRL91, 072303 (2003)
away
near
Col
limat
edre
gion
away
Modification of away side Jet• Correlation of back-to-back jets t
hrough high pT hadrons
• Trigger leading high pT (4<pT<6) hadrons• Angle correlation of lower pT (2<pT<tr
ig) particles with triggered hadrons• Near side: In Same Cone of leading• Away side: In Cone of associated jet
• p+p and peripheral Au+Au:• Near side yield = Away side yield
• Central Au+Au: away side particles suppressed. • Energy loss of away side Jet• Near side jet produced almost at su
rface of medium Histogram: p+p, Black Points: Au+AuBlue Line: Mixed background
Au + Au central
Au + Au peripheral
Trigger particles sit at 0.
STAR PRL90, 082302 (2003)
Near(Trigger) Side Away Side
Even lower pT associated particles (1.0<pT<2.5)
Strong Modification of away-side Jet observed!Dawn of Jet tomography
(Folded into 0-)
hep-ph/0411315Casalderrey-Solana,Shuryak,Teaney
Wake effect or “sonic boom”
hep-ph/0411341Armesto,Salgado,Wiedemann
Correlations of Jets with flowing medium
Where is away side Jet ?Interpretation..
W. Holtzmann for PHENIX, WWND, 2005
Heavy Quark(onium)• Charm or bottom produced in hard scatt
ering process
• Energy loss of light quark is mostly due to gluon radiation (analogous to Bremsstrahlung)• How about heavier quarks? Collisional en
ergy loss? • Charmonium in hot dense medium will b
e:• Suppressed due to dissociation (debye s
creening)• Enhanced due to coalescence of c-cbar
D mesons
, ’,
Large Q value needed (>≈3GeV)
pQCD should work better!
Perturbative Vacuum
cc
Color Screening
cc
J/ (M=3.1GeV/c2)
•PHENIX•Single electron measurements in p+p, d+Au, Au+Au sNN = 130,200,62.4 GeV
•STAR•Direct D mesons hadronic decay channels in d+Au
•D0K•D±K•D*±D0
•Single electron measurements in p+p, d+Au
Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 192303 (2002)
Single heavy quark measurement•Experimentally observe the decay products of Heavy Flavor particles (e.g. D-mesons)
•Hadronic decay channels DKD00
•Semi-leptonic decays De() Ke
Meson D±,D0
Mass 1869(1865) GeV
BR D0 --> K+- (3.85 ± 0.10) %
BR D --> e+ +X 17.2(6.7) %
BR D --> ++X 6.6 %
Single electron Result• Strong modification of the spectral sha
pe in Au+Au is observed at high pT
• Statistics insufficient to quantify centrality dependence
• Possibility of different energy loss mechanism?
T. Tabaru for PHENIX, ICPAQGP05, 2005
PHENIX PRELIMINARY
RAA of Integrated CS (2.5<pT<5.0 GeV/c).
AAAA
AB pp
dNR
T d
y2 x2 y2 x2
2cos2 vx
y
p
patan
dN/d=v0/(2)+v2cos(2) /+…
Where is suppressed Charm?
• Particles boosted by pressure gradients in collision area• Elliptic shape turns into
anisotropic flow• Positive flow(v2) = Collective motion with
expanding system
= Hint of equilibrium
• Energy loss of charm implies interaction of charm with the medium
• Charm participate in collective motion!
STAR, nucl-ex/0411007, Theory curves from:Greco, Ko, Rapp: Phys. Lett. B595 (2004) 202
Strong indication of “quark level” early equilibrium
R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter, J. Rafelski, Phys Rev C 63, 054905Plasma Coalescence Model
Binary Scaling
Stat.ModelAndronic et al nucl-th/0303036
Absorption (Nuclear + QGP) + final-state coalescence
Absorption (Nuclear + QGP)L. Grandchamp, R. Rapp, Nucl Phys A709, 415; Phys Lett B 523, 60
y = 1.0
y = 4.0
Phys.Rev.C69, 014901,2004 Not enough statistics to make definitive conclusions
Charmonium resultsFirst J/ ->ee measurement in heavy ion collisions!
J/->ee
Au+Au sNN=200GeV
Summary• Hard scattering (pQCD) as new probe for NpQCD QGP
• Cross section is significantly large at RHIC. Calculable by pQCD• Calibrated by Direct photon
• First measurement in high energy heavy ion collisions
• Jet modification• High pT particle yield (fragment of Jet) suppression in central Au+Au collisions
• Hot dense medium expanding both transverse and longitudinal direction• Away side jet is strongly modified
• Hint of Charm suppression and flow in Au+Au collisions• Needs more statistics to conclude
• High Statistics Run4 Au+Au data is now in analysis• 10 times statistics: ~ 1.5G events accumulated• Thermal radiation on top of pQCD photon -> Direct emission from QGP• 700 J/ ’s expected -> precise measurement of charmonium• Complemented by Run5 Cu+Cu data on system size dependence
• Hard scattering will be even more powerful probe at LHC
Future Outlook
RHIC Collaborations
STARSTAR