hsc-ssp view of dust obscured...
TRANSCRIPT
Tohru Nagao, Michael A. Strauss, Masaru Kajisawa, Tomo Goto, Masa Imanishi, and the HSC-DOGs team
Yoshiki TOBA (鳥羽 儀樹) (Ehime Univ. => ASIAA )
Toba et al. 2015, PASJ, 67, 86
Toba et al. 2016b, in prep.
銀河進化研究会2016 2016.06.02
HSC-SSP view of Dust Obscured Galaxies
Tohru Nagao, Michael A. Strauss, Masaru Kajisawa, Tomo Goto, Masa Imanishi, and the HSC-DOGs team
Yoshiki TOBA (鳥羽 儀樹) (Ehime Univ. => ASIAA )
Toba et al. 2015, PASJ, 67, 86
Toba et al. 2016b, in prep.
銀河進化研究会2016 2016.06.02
HSC-SSP view of Dust Obscured Galaxies
IR Luminosity Function
IR Luminosity Density
Auto Correlation Function
Toba+15
Toba+16b in prep.
Introduction
What are Dust Obscured Galaxies (DOGs)?
Dogs are obscured by blanket..
犬
狗
dog3
hund
cane
σκυλί
perrohond
собака
cãochien
Dust Obscured GalaxiesIntroductionStatistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
R - [24] ≥ 7.5 (AB mag)
~ ULIRGs
• An optically faint but IR bright objects.
• Most DOGs are u l t ra-luminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs: LIR ≥ 1012 Lsun).
flux (24 µm) [mJy]1 100.1
8
654
7
9
R -
[24
] (A
B m
ag)
Calanog+13
DOGs criterion
z = 1.99 ± 0.45
Dey+08
z ~ 2
• Confirmed from follow-up observations (NIR and MIR spectroscopy).
4
Bump DOGs
PL DOGs
Two types of DOGs
Introduction
Power-Law (PL) DOGs
• They show a rising power-law SED, which indicates an AGN activity.
AGN-dominated DOGs
Bump DOGs
• They show a rest-frame 1.6 µm “bump” in their SEDs.
• They also show strong PAH emission.,which indicates a SF activity.
SF-dominated DOGs
Dey+085
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
IR bright DOGs PL DOGs
Introduction
6
≃
Dey+08
flux (24 µm) [mJy]0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0P
L D
OG
s fr
acti
on
[%]
80
60
40
20
0
100IR-bright DOGs
100
10
1.0 0.60.8flux (24 µm) [mJy]
0.4
Num
ber
/deg
2
Dey+08
• The fraction of PL DOGs (i.e., AGN-dominated DOGs) increases with increasing MIR flux.
• IR-bright DOGs are expected to be AGN dominated DOGs.
• The number densities of DOGs decreases with increasing MIR flux., which means IR-bright DOGs are very low.
• It requires a large area survey.
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
What are the DOGs?
Introduction
7
Bump DOGs・ PL DOGs
IR bright DOGs PL DOGs AGN-dominated DOGs
IR-bright, optically faint obj. z~2
≃≃
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Narayanan+10
Importance of DOGs
Introduction
9
24/R = 260 24/R = 177 24/R = 845 24/R = 1016 24/R = 115
② ③ ④ ⑤①
① ⑤0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Time (Gyr)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
24
/R F
lux
Rati
o a
t z=
2
MDM
=6x1012
M 1:1 Merger
Bump Source
Submm Flux
Peak SFR
Peak BH Accretion
24/R
flux
rat
io a
t z=
2
Time [Gyr]
←Peak BH accretion
←PLDOGs phase
③④②
Growing-up phase!?
←Peak BH accretion
←PLDOGs phase
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Narayanan+10
Importance of DOGs
Introduction
9
24/R = 260 24/R = 177 24/R = 845 24/R = 1016 24/R = 115
② ③ ④ ⑤①
① ⑤0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Time (Gyr)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
24
/R F
lux
Rati
o a
t z=
2
MDM
=6x1012
M 1:1 Merger
Bump Source
Submm Flux
Peak SFR
Peak BH Accretion
24/R
flux
rat
io a
t z=
2
Time [Gyr]
←Peak BH accretion
←PLDOGs phase
③④②
Growing-up phase!?
←Peak BH accretion
←PLDOGs phase
IR-bright DOGs could constitute a key population for understanding the co-evolution of
galaxies and SMBHs.
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Purpose of this study
Introduction
10
(2) Investigating their photometric and statistical properties
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
(1) Search for IR-bright DOGs based on the HSC with VIKING and WISE
Purpose of this study
Introduction
10
HSC+WISE(Final status)
COSMOS
SWIRE (XMM/Chandra)
NDWFS
CDF/E-CDFS/EGS
E-CDFS
GOODS-N
GOODS-S
This study (Toba+15)
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Toba+15 Toba+16
HSC, VIKING, and WISE
Data and Analysis
12
bandlimiting mag (5σ、2″)
Total number of objects
HSC S14A_0
i ~2616,392,815
HSC S14A_0 y ~24
16,392,815
VIKING DR1
Z 23.1
14,773,385VIKING
DR1
Y 22.3
14,773,385VIKING
DR1 J 22.1 14,773,385VIKING
DR1H 21.5
14,773,385VIKING
DR1
Ks 21.2
14,773,385
ALLWISE
3.4 19.6
747,634,026ALLWISE4.6 19.3
747,634,026ALLWISE12 16.4
747,634,026ALLWISE
22 14.5
747,634,026D
ec
RA
14h40 14h30 14h20 14h10
4
2
0
-2
VIKING DR1
HSC S14A_0
GAMA 14hr field (~10 deg2)
※ AB mag
We used those bands to search for IR-bright DOGs
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
R.A.
Dec
l.
Sample Selection
Data and Analysis
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
13
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Sample Selection
Data and Analysis
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
13
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
30″
30″multiple counterpart
WISEHSC
A search radius
Sample Selection
Data and Analysis
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
13
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Sample Selection
Data and Analysis
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
Create the clean subsample①
Clean HSCi-selected catalog
Clean VIKINGKs-selected catalog
Clean WISE22 µm-selected
catalog
13
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
Clean HSCi-selected catalog
Clean VIKINGKs-selected catalog
Clean WISE22 µm-selected
catalog
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
Clean HSCi-selected catalog
Clean VIKINGKs-selected catalog
Clean WISE22 µm-selected
catalog
②
③HSC-VIKING sample (×0.0005)
DOGs sample (Bussmann et al. 2012)HSC-VIKING sample (×0.0005)
1.2
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
②
③
⑤
④
Clean WISE22 µm-selected
catalog
HSC-WISE DOGs (48)HSC-WISE non-DOGs (159)
!"#$%&'#"()&*+%#,''-**.&"$--/0123415/6
7%+,*)8/9:9;<=>?@;-*A+*B-'B&C%+-9:989DEF9
97+$G'-*,*&,'%#',)$&,'%BB*)9%#9H)(*7+$G'-*,*&,'%#'.$,&C'%BB*)9%#9H)(*
DEF7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'*-G*9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'#$,()$,*-'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'&)'&*B,*)9%#9J$+#*
7+$G'7+$G#'.%I*+'A$-9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&!"-*+'7+(I'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*7+$G'&*B,)"%-'#-##'7+$G#9%#9J$+#*
K@L@EM9FN9/9/O1PP21256
@B9,C*9MDQD9/O9)*G%"B9R
0P415O2 ST=
.)%U)=*&9:989UN
.)%U)=*&:9J)$!*=*,@F9
ST=
K@L@EM9#$!.+*42O1450
ST=
99<=>9#$!.+*0184O16P8
<=>?K@L@EM9#$!.+*
ST=
5213/8
ST=
9999DVVW@=TPOP102O18409
XO'#$,:989XO'&&'!$.:989
*I,'7+G9:98
ST=
99W@=T9#$!.+*31O231338
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9W@=T″
ST=
<=>?W@=T9FUM#O5
ST=
48P
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
@B9,C*9"Y*)+$.9)*G%"B9X%,C9K@L@EMR
ST=
/P51804
>)"##?!$,&C9X%,C9K@L@EM″
/122321O/O1/6O
Z#..T))[%,#9:989
DEF
②
③
⑤
④
Clean WISE22 µm-selected
catalog
HSC-WISE DOGs (48)HSC-WISE non-DOGs (159)
48 IR-bright DOGs were selected
Type Classification (PL /Bump)
Data and Analysis
K-band excess EKs
Ks-band excess
EKs > 3: Bump DOGs
EKs < 3: PL DOGs
16
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Results and Discussions
Photometric and Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
17
• Spectral Energy Distributions • IR Luminosity Function • IR Luminosity Density
SEDs for PL and Bump DOGs
Results and Discussions
18
individualaverage
individualaverage
PL DOGs (31) Bump DOGs (17)PL (31) Bump (17)
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
SEDs for PL and Bump DOGs
Results and Discussions
About 65% of our DOGs sample were classified as PL DOGs
18
individualaverage
individualaverage
PL DOGs (31) Bump DOGs (17)PL (31) Bump (17)
35%65%
PL DOGs Bump DOGs
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Total IR luminosity function
19
Results and Discussions
Assuming that the redshift distribution for our DOG sample is Gaussian (z= 1.99 ± 0.45; Dey et al. 2008)
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
z = 1.99 ± 0.45
Dey+08
Total IR luminosity function
19
Results and Discussions
Assuming that the redshift distribution for our DOG sample is Gaussian (z= 1.99 ± 0.45; Dey et al. 2008)
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Melbourne+12
LIR/νLν (24µm) = 6.5 ± 1.4
Total IR luminosity function
19
Results and Discussions
Assuming that the redshift distribution for our DOG sample is Gaussian (z= 1.99 ± 0.45; Dey et al. 2008)
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Calanog et al. 2013
This work (18 IR luminous DOGs)
Newly constrained by our study
Total IR luminosity function
19
Results and Discussions
Assuming that the redshift distribution for our DOG sample is Gaussian (z= 1.99 ± 0.45; Dey et al. 2008)
Statistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Calanog et al. 2013
This work (18 IR luminous DOGs)
Newly constrained by our study
The shape of LF can be fitted well by double-power law.
Total IR luminosity density ρIR
20
Results and DiscussionsStatistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Murphy et al. 2011 (M11)This work (DOGs)This work (IR-bright DOGs)
AGNs (M11)ULIRGs (M11)
Dey et al. 2008
Newly constrained by our study
Total IR luminosity density ρIR
20
Results and DiscussionsStatistical properties of IR-bright DOGs
Murphy et al. 2011 (M11)This work (DOGs)This work (IR-bright DOGs)
AGNs (M11)ULIRGs (M11)
Dey et al. 2008
Newly constrained by our study
The contribution of ρIR (IR-bright DOGs) to that of other populations;
ρIR (ULIRGs @z~2): > 9%ρIR (All DOGs @ z~2): > 15%
Current Status of DOGs search
21
Clustering properties of IR-bright DOGs discovered by HSC S15B and ALLWISE
Search for IR-bright DOGs based on latest dataset
Toba, Nagao, Kajisawa et al. in prep.
Field Selection -5/7 fields~
Current Status of studies on DOGs
22
Clustering properties of IR-brightDOGs
XMM
WIDE-12
VVDS
GAMA09GAMA15
Random pointsDOGs 1411 IR-bright DOGs were selected
Spatial Distribution of DOGs
23
Clustering properties of IR-brightDOGs Current Status of studies on DOGs
GAMA09 GAMA15
XMM-LSSWIDE12
Strong
Weak
Clu
ster
ing
Str
eng
th
Brodwin+08SMGs (Blain+04)QSOs at 2.0 < z < 2.5 (Shen+09)
?
Auto Correlation Function of DOGs
24
β = 0.9 (Brodwin+08)
ACF: ω(θ) = Aω θ-β
Clustering properties of IR-brightDOGs Current Status of studies on DOGs
Aω = 11.3 ± 3.72
Spatial Distribution of DOGs
25
Clustering properties of IR-brightDOGs Current Status of studies on DOGs
GAMA09 GAMA15
XMM-LSSWIDE12
Strong
Weak
Clu
ster
ing
Str
eng
th
Brodwin+08SMGs (Blain+04)QSOs at 2.0 < z < 2.5 (Shen+09)
Newly constrained by our studyThis work
Spatial Distribution of DOGs
25
Clustering properties of IR-brightDOGs Current Status of studies on DOGs
GAMA09 GAMA15
XMM-LSSWIDE12
Strong
Weak
Clu
ster
ing
Str
eng
th
Brodwin+08SMGs (Blain+04)QSOs at 2.0 < z < 2.5 (Shen+09)
Newly constrained by our studyThis work
IR-bright DOGs could be clustered strongly
Summary
Summary
1. We newly discovered 48 DOGs based on the HSC, VIKING, and WISE data.
2. Assuming that the redshift distribution for our DOGs sample (z = 1.99 ± 0.45), we derived the space density of them. The IR LF including data obtained from the literature is fitted well by a double-power law.
3. We also derived lower limit of IR LD for our sample, and its contributions to the ρIR (ULURGs) and ρIR (All DOGs) are >9%, and >15%, respectively
4. The clustering analysis of 1,411 DOGs discovered by latest dataset could indicates that they are strongly clustered.
26
銀河進化研究会2016