identification of molecules linked to low filtration … of molecules linked to low filtration...
TRANSCRIPT
Identification of molecules linked to
low filtration performances.
Examples of malting barleys tested at
pilot plant level.
EBC Brewing Science Group 10th Technical meeting
Vienna – September 2014
Marc SCHMITT
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 2
Context of the study
Justification : Mash & beer filtration problems are of importance for barley to beer chain
Aims : Identification of molecules linked with low filtration performances
Study of behaviour during malting & brewing
Industrial strategy : Improve filtration conditions
Reduce enzymes utilization
Expected results : Optimised mash and beer filtration conditions
Looking for tools to improve barley selection
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 4
Outline
Focus on malting barley homologation (France)
Molecules of interest : Presentation
Materials & methods used
Samples production, analytical plan & results Some examples of samples used
Impact of process
Conclusions & perspectives
Malting barley varieties homologation
• Registering on french catalog
• TAV, DHS, techno barley
• Malting barley List
• Quality index (malt)
• Pre-validation technological
• Functional index
Yield Sieving ; proteins ; SW
Malt : Extract ; enzymes ; proteins
Malt : Fermentability ; Functionalities
Extract, friability, diastasic power, viscosity, beta-glucans, etc…
Modification, attenuation, FAN, a-amylase, tepral filtration, etc…
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 5
Malting barley varieties homologation
• Technological validation
• Pilot tests Tests CBMO
• Commercial and industrial observation
• Maltsters & brewers
Barley to beer : Looking for big troubles
Agronomical development
Industrial productions
Industrial validations
Preferred variety
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 6
BRASSEURS DE FRANCE - 25, boulevard Malesherbes - 75008 PARIS - TEL. 01 42 66 29 27 - FAX. 01 42 66 07 66 - [email protected]
MALTEURS DE FRANCE- 66, rue de La Boétie - 75008 PARIS - TEL. 01 43 59 44 93 - FAX. : 01 43 59 46 02 – [email protected]
GESINE / RGT PLANET / PRUNELLA
Step 2
Juin
2014
Step 1 AMISTAR / VOYEL
BEATRIX / SEBASTIAN VANESSA ESTEREL / PASSEREL
CALYPSO
ODYSSEY / OVERTURE / TRAVELER
KWS AURELIA / PIONIER / SANETTE / STYLE
BELLINI / CONCERTO /NFC TIPPLE PRESTIGE/SUNSHINE
EXPLORER /GRACE / KWS IRINA / ZEPPELIN SALAMANDRE
ARTURIO / AZUREL
CASINO / ETINCEL / ISOCEL
More than 15 000 ha
Less than15 000 ha
Limited use
In commercial and industrial observation: Step 1 : Varieties which have successfully passed the IFBM pilot tests and subjected to industrial tests in order to check that all functional Malting and Brewing expectations are fulfilled. This period should allow commercial development of the variety Step 2 :Varieties under industrial tests in order to check that all functional Malting and Brewing expectations are fulfilled. They must be multiplied over 150 hectares and must have an interest for a maltster and a brewer. Admitted in technological validation : New registered varieties on Brewery orientation list of CTPS and proposed by CBMO to IFBM pilot tests. Limited use : Variety adapted to certain specifications which commercial output has to be secured.
LIST OF PREFERRED VARIETIES of MALTEURS DE FRANCE and BRASSEURS DE FRANCE
MALTING BARLEY - CROP 2015
SPRING BARLEY WINTER BARLEY
2 ROWS 6 ROWS
VARIETIES IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL OBSERVATION
VARIETIES ADMITTED IN TECHNOLOGICAL VALIDATION
PREFERRED VARIETIES
SY TEPEE
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 7
Malting barley varieties homologation
System is made to keep only the better lines…
Important to detect possible problems linked to a cultivar
Filtration problems are only detected at pilot plant level
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 8
Functional qualities of malt Looking for relevant tools to improve knowledge &
database collection
Barley breeders are looking for tests to improve barley selection Detection of “problems” as early as possible
Providing more specific definitions of required specifications
EBC congress mash : Mashing profile…
Increasing gap with results observed in current industrial practices
=> Lack of informations in EBC congress wort IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 9
Non starchy polysaccharides :
linked with filtration problems…
Aleurone layer
Husks
Arabinoxylans
6 to 10 % dm
Starchy endosperm
b-glucans
3 to 5 % dm
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 10
Water retention
Hydrogen bonds
Formation of viscous solutions & gels
Wort viscosity
Wort turbidity
Filtration problems
Consequences
Properties
Introduction
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 12
Principle :
Colorimetric reaction with phloroglucinol
Reaction with hexoses & pentoses
Quantification of xylose after acid hydrolysis
Measurement :
Differences of absorbancy
(510 & 552 nm)
ARAX content determination
Wort or extract
Wort hydrolysis
Colorimetric
reaction
Xylose content
ARAX content
Revision of the method for better accuracy IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 13
Why ?
Need to have more informations
How ?
Precipitation of HMW arax
Principle :
Precipitation with 1-propanol
Quantification
HMW-ARAX content determination
Precipitation with
1-propanol
Centrifugation
Concentration of
precipitate
Hydrolysis
Quantification of
arabinoxylans
(Adapted from
Novozymes, J. Obrecht, 2012
&
INRA Nantes, L. Saulnier, 2012)
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 14
Why ?
Need to have more informations
Principle : (MEBAK 2.5.5)
Thermal treatment
Quantification
Beta-glucan “gel” content
10 mL
wort
10 mL
wort
E1 E2
Water bath 15 min x 80°C
20°C
Centrifuge, 20 min, 3500g
Supernatent
Quantification of soluble β-Glucans
(EBC 8.13.2)
Procedure Calculation E1 [mg/L] - E2 [mg/L] = β-GG [mg/L]
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 15
Steric exclusion chromatography
Injection
Small
molecules
Separation
according size of
molecules
Solvant
Sample
Cavités
poreuses
Detection
Retention time
Big
molecules
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 16
HPSEC : research &
identification of molecules linked
with viscosity & filtration
problems
Steric exclusion chromatography with triple detection
Equipment
1 2 3
Light diffusion signal
Viscosity signal
Refractometric signal
Study
Study of interesting samples from IFBM pilot plant
With & without filtration problems
Study of brewing (& malting) conditions
« Tepral » brewing & filtration system
Analyses :
HPSEC
Wort viscosity
b-glucans & arabinoxylans
… IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 18
Malting pilot plant test
Steeping : 600 kg of inox cylindro vessel with aeration and temperature management
Germination : 2 saladins vessels, 70 cm
Kilning : simple desk electric energy and air flow variation
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 19
Pilot plant brewing
20 hl & automatised
cereal cooker & mash tun
Lauter tun
Brew Kettle
Whirlpool
Fermenter of 20 hl
Propagator
Beer filtration: Filtrox frame
Bottling : CARBOFILL IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 20
Brewing conditions
Malt throw = 300 kg (± 5)
Water = 850 kg
pH = 5.4+/- 0.1
Pilot plant brewing
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
0 15 30 45 60 75 90
Time (min)
Tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
50°C
64°C
74°C
78°C
Wort gravity :
12°P end of boiling
Lauter tun load :
170 kg/m2
Fermentation :
Pitching : 17 +/- 2 M – O2 : 8 ppm
T° : 12 – 14°C
P : 0.5 – 1.0 bar
Boiling : 60’
Evaporation : 6%
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 21
Computerized mashing system
57 g fine gring & 200 ml water
Mash-in temperature : 50°C (15 min)
Rests temperatures : 63 & 75°C (15 min)
Mash filtration speed (1 bar pressure)
Sparging with 200 ml water at 75°C
Sparging filtration speed (1.5 bar pressure)
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
0 20 40 60 80
Time (min)
Te
mp
era
ture
(°C
)
Filtration
Computerized mashing system
57 g fine gring & 200 ml water
Mash-in temperature : 50°C (15 min)
Rests temperatures : 63 & 75°C (15 min)
Mash filtration speed (1 bar pressure)
Sparging with 200 ml water at 75°C
Sparging filtration speed (1.5 bar pressure)
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
0 20 40 60 80
Time (min)
Te
mp
era
ture
(°C
)
Filtration
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
0 20 40 60 80
Time (min)
Te
mp
era
ture
(°C
)
FiltrationFiltration
Laboratory scale :Tepral filtration system
Mash-in : 45, 50, 55 & 60°C
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 22
Tepral filtration system
Tepral filtration :
Registered parameters : • Filtration speed
• Time to filter 350 g of wort
• Filtration duration
• Sparging speed
Test used in Fonctional Index calculation IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 23
Study : analytical plan
Malt (600 kg pilot plant)
Pilot brew (20 hl)
Process control (all steps)
- Malt analyses
- Tepral filtration - ≠ mash-in t°
- …
Analyses on tepral wort
bGL
- ARAX
- FAN
- Soluble N
- etc IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 24
Study
13/09/2014 25
Interesting available samples :
CBMO malts :
Batches Mash filtration Beer filtration
Cargo 1 LL K
Cargo 2 K K
Cargo 3 LL L
CARGO
ATLANTICK Atlantick 2 K LL
SY TEPEE SY Tepee 2 J K
EXPLORER Explorer 3 J K
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 25
Example of pilot brew
CARGO : 6RW Observations CARGO 3
Brewing :
Saccharification (min) 15
Wort + sparging filtration duration (min) 189
Time to filter 450 kg (min) 50
Weight filtered before raking (Kg) 1002
Raking during filtration 0
Raking during sparging 0-6-9
Wort aspect hazy + floaters
Yield end boiling / throw (%DM) 74,0
Sediments - Whirlpool (ml/l) 70
Fermentation :
% attenuation / FA at 7 days (%) 100,0
Diketons at cooling (mg/l) 0,42
Cooling day 8
Observations CARGO 3
Beer filtration :
Nomber of filtrations 1
DP end filtration 1 (kg/cm2) 1,0
Flow end filtration 1 (hl/h) 10,0
Volume filtered (hl) 15,5
Filtration duration (min) 90
Yeast before filtration (millions cell/ml) 5,5
Temperature before filtration (°C) -1,8
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 26
Example of pilot brew
ATLANTICK : 6RW Observations ATLANTICK 2
Brewing :
Saccharification (min) 15
Wort + sparging filtration duration (min) 157
Time to filter 450 kg (min) 41
Weight filtered before raking (Kg) 1455
Raking during filtration 0
Raking during sparging 0-0-3
Wort aspect hazy + floaters
Yield end boiling / throw (%DM) 74,4
Sediments - Whirlpool (ml/l) 80
Fermentation :
% attenuation / FA at 7 days (%) 99,00
Diketons at cooling (mg/l) 0,23
Cooling day 8
Observations ATLANTICK 2
Beer filtration :
Nomber of filtrations 1
DP end filtration 1 (kg/cm2) 2,0
Flow end filtration 1 (hl/h) 4,2
Volume filtered (hl) 14,3
Filtration duration (min) 110
Yeast before filtration (millions cell/ml) 1,5
Temperature before filtration (°C) -2,0
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 27
Example of pilot brew
SY TEPEE : 2RW
Observations SY TEPEE 2
Brewing :
Saccharification (min) 15
Wort + sparging filtration duration (min) 154
Time to filter 450 kg (min) 42
Weight filtered before raking (Kg) 1940
Raking during filtration 0
Raking during sparging 0-0-1
Wort aspect hazy + floaters
Yield end boiling / throw (%DM) 75,7
Sediments - Whirlpool (ml/l) 100
Fermentation :
% attenuation / FA at 7 days (%) 97,9
Diketons at cooling (mg/l) 0,41
Cooling day 8
Observations SY TEPEE 2
Beer filtration :
Nomber of filtrations 1
DP end filtration 1 (kg/cm2) 0,6
Flow end filtration 1 (hl/h) 10,0
Volume filtered (hl) 16,1
Filtration duration (min) 95
Yeast before filtration (millions cell/ml) 4,8
Temperature before filtration (°C) -1,8
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 28
Example of pilot brew
EXPLORER : 2RS Observations EXPLORER 3
Brewing :
Saccharification (min) 15
Wort + sparging filtration duration (min) 155
Time to filter 450 kg (min) 42
Weight filtered before raking (Kg) 1924
Raking during filtration 0
Raking during sparging 0-0-1
Wort aspect hazy + floaters
Yield end boiling / throw (%DM) 74,8
Sediments - Whirlpool (ml/l) 190
Fermentation :
% attenuation / FA at 7 days (%) 97,9
Diketons at cooling (mg/l) 0,18
Cooling day 8
Observations EXPLORER 3
Beer filtration :
Nomber of filtrations 1
DP end filtration 1 (kg/cm2) 0,7
Flow end filtration 1 (hl/h) 10,1
Volume filtered (hl) 16,1
Filtration duration (min) 95
Yeast before filtration (millions cell/ml) 5,6
Temperature before filtration (°C) -2,0
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 29
Study – Results Tepral filtration with ≠ mash-in temperatures :
Friabilité
Beta
glucanesViscosité
Protéines
solublesIK
CARGO1 67 362 1,75 3,29 30
CARGO2 68 303 1,70 3,70 35
CARGO3 67 330 1,71 4,40 40
Filtration speed
Beta-glucans
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 30
Study – Results Tepral filtration with ≠ mash-in temperatures :
Friabilité
Beta
glucanesViscosité
Protéines
solublesIK
CARGO1 67 362 1,75 3,29 30
CARGO2 68 303 1,70 3,70 35
CARGO3 67 330 1,71 4,40 40
Filtration speed
Viscosity
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 31
Study – Results Tepral filtration with ≠ mash-in temperatures :
Solubles & HMW Arax
Filtration speed
Arax
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 32
Study – Results
13/09/2014 Titre 33
Tepral filtration with ≠ mash-in temperatures :
Filtration speed
Viscosity
Study – Results Tepral filtration with ≠ mash-in temperatures :
Solubles & HMW Arax
Filtration speed
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 34
Study – Results Tepral filtration with ≠ mash-in temperatures :
b-GG…
Only CARGO worts present significant content of b-GG… b-glucans content with mash-in temperature
b-GG content with mash-in temperature
Mash-in t° CARGO1 CARGO2 CARGO3 ATLANTICK2 SY TEPPE2 EXPLORER3
45°C 26 22 32 3 1 16
50°C 27 15 28 0 2 2
55°C 24 19 22 0 2 0
60°C 15 9 12 2 2 10
Beta glucans gel (mg/l)
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 35
Malt batches tested showed big differences for their filtration performances
Malt batches (varieties) tested didn’t have the same sensitivity to the mash-in temperature
Filtrations properties are linked to solubles polysaccharides
b-GG seems to be related with mash filtration problems
content with mash-in temperature
Solubles arax of HMW seems to be related with beer filtration problems
no clear relation with mash-in temperature (ARAX)
Great correlation between filtration parameters & HMW NSPS
Study : First Conclusions
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 41
Study – HPSEC Results
Teprals worts T 45°C
Cargo 1
Cargo 3
Atlantick 2
Explorer 3
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 45
Study – HPSEC Results
Teprals worts T 50°C
Cargo 1
Cargo 3
Atlantick 2
Explorer 3
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 46
Study – HPSEC Results
Teprals worts T 55°C
Cargo 1
Cargo 3
Explorer 3
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 47
Study – HPSEC Results
Cargo 1
Atlantick 2
Teprals worts T 63°C
HPSEC profile in accordance with analyses & previous tests :
peak at 26-27 min : arax
peak at 30-32 min : beta-glucans IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 48
Study – HPSEC Results
Barley EXPLORER
Malt EXPLORER
LRGP - CNRS
Wort EXPLORER
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 49
Study – HPSEC Results
Interpretation : Comparison of profiles
Integration of peaks with significant informations
Calculation of some parameters :
Average size of molecules
Average intrinsic viscosity of molecules
Average concentration of molecules
LRGP - CNRS
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 50
Study – HPSEC Results
Atlantick Cargo Explorer
Mean molecular weight (kDa) 54,7 49,7 43,9
Intrisec viscosity 0,29 0,39 0,14
Concentration (g.L-1
) 2,19 3,31 2,49
Mean molecular weight (kDa) 103,2 74,0 137,0
Intrisec viscosity 0,20 0,21 0,12
Concentration (g.L-1) 2,48 2,06 1,63
Barley
Malt
Summary of results :
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 51
Conclusions : Barleys, Malts & worts showed different profiles
Varieties analysed showed different profiles
Molecules produced during malting process showed various properties with HPSEC (MW, IV, CC)
HPSEC Conclusions
Perspectives : Identification of concerned molecules with help of enzymes
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 52
Conclusions
Conclusions & hypotheses
Atlantick Cargo Explorer SY Tepee
Beta glucansSolubles ++ +++ + -
beta-GG - + - -
Solubles ARAXTotal ++ +++ + ++
Arax HPM + + - -
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 53
Conclusions & perspectives
Conclusions : Developped technics are of interest
Tepral filtration give interesting informations (vs EBC wort)
Filtrations properties are linked to solubles polysaccharides (in the observed samples) :
b-GG seems to be related with mash filtration problems
Solubles arax of HMW seems to be related with beer filtration problems (same observation in recent samples)
HMW NSPS are related to filtration performances
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 54
Conclusions & perspectives
Perspectives : Collection of informations to go on
Study of samples with “other” problems :
Linked to proteins (data not shown)
Study of enzymes & their activities…
Are differences observed due to :
Different or more / less active enzymes ?
Fine barley grain structure…
Are differences observed due to different barley grain composition & structure ?
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 55
Contact : IFBM
Marc SCHMITT [email protected]
IFBM / EBC BSG WIEN / September 2014 56
Thanks to the support of :
Malteurs de France
&
Brasseurs de France
Thank you for your attention