ik hee ryu , hun yang, david s. kang, jin kuk kim bs clean vision eye center

11
Comparison of the Topographic Optical Zone After LASIK for Myopic Astigmatism With 2 Excimer Laser Platforms Ik Hee Ryu, Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin Kuk Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this e- poster.

Upload: sasson

Post on 24-Feb-2016

59 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparison of the Topographic Optical Zone After LASIK for Myopic Astigmatism With 2 Excimer Laser Platforms. Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin Kuk Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

Comparison of the Topographic Optical Zone After LASIK for Myopic Astigma-tism With 2 Excimer Laser Platforms

Ik Hee Ryu, Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin Kuk KimBS Clean Vision Eye center

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster.

Page 2: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

• By technical advance in excimer laser platform, pro-grammed ablation zone gains it’s maximal boundary▫ Night vision symptoms such as halo and glare due to

larger scopotic pupil in relation of ablated corneal optical zone being dramatically decreased

• Different manufacturer produce a variety of laser plat-forms, yielding various degree of effective optical zone zone under identical ablation zone and parameters▫ Several papers previously reported a difference between

intended ablation zone and actual effective optical zone regardless of excimer laser platforms

Page 3: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

Purpose• In our study

▫Two types of excimer laser : Allegretto-Q 400 Hz & Schwind Amaris being used

▫Comparison after laser refractive surgery in ablation parameters (short & long axis, abla-tion area) between two platforms

▫Investigating preoperative parameters relation to postoperative optical zone

Page 4: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

Patients & Methods• Between Feb. to Mar., 2010, 99 patients (198 eyes) with fem-

tosecond laser-assisted LASIK enrolled; retropective study un-dergone▫ Allegretto group: 50 patients (100 eyes)▫ Amaris group : 49 patients (98 eyes) ▫ Identical programmed ablation zone of 6.5 mm applied to all

cases of LASIK regardless of laser platforms • After certain period of time (mean: 19.4 days), topographic

measurements performed▫ Short and long axis of optical zone identified on the topography

were measured▫ Area of optical zone was calculated via short/long axis

Page 5: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

• Measurement of optical zone▫ Short and long axis identified as an imaginary line connecting

the boundary margin at least 1 diopter difference from the center

▫ Optical zone being elliptical in all cases, short and long axis can be identified

• Area of Optical zone▫ Area = ∏ × long axis × short axis/4

• Contributing factors▫ Investigate to identify statistical correlation between optical

zone and preoperative sphere, cylinder, sphere-cylinder ratio, keratometric value (K1, K2, mean K)

▫ Statistical comparison by spearman correlation (SPSS 12.0 ver.)

Page 6: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

Long axis

Short axis

Page 7: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

ResultsAllegretto Amaris

Short axis (mm) 4.58 ± 0.40 4.21 ± 0.49 p=0.031*

Long axis (mm) 5.23 ± 0.40 4.93 ± 0.48 p=0.039*

Area (mm2) 18.89 ± 2.65 16.37 ± 2.83 p=0.652

*: statistically significant

Page 8: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

Allegretto groupSpearman Correlation Coefficients, N = 100Pre_Sph Pre_Cyl Pre_SE Pre_SC_ratio Pre_K1 Pre_K2

Short axis 0.3489 0.8270 0.3858 0.9082 0.6573 0.9046

Long axis 0.0358 0.0008 0.1307 <.0001 0.8276 0.1516

Area 0.5049 0.0557 0.6999 0.0065 0.9252 0.3780

Spearman Correlation Coefficients, N = 98Pre_Sph Pre_Cyl Pre_SE Pre_SC_ratio Pre_K1 Pre_K2

Short axis 0.1109 0.1232 0.1002 0.1348 0.5203 0.4967Long axis <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 0.0021 0.0792Area 0.0004 0.2312 0.0016 0.0893 0.0280 0.0918

Amaris group

Pre: preoperative; sph: spherical; cyl: cylinder; SE: spherical equivalent; SC: sphero-cylinder ratio; K1: lower K value; K2: higer K valuered blanks: statistically significant

Page 9: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

Conclusions• Topographical optical zone

▫Diameters (long and short axis) A statistical significance in Allegretto group In short and long axis, longer diameter observed

▫Calculated area of optical zone Larger in Allegretto group, but not statistically signifi-

cant• No linear correlation between preoperative pa-

rameters and optical zone in both diameters and calculated area regardless of laser platforms

Page 10: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

• Allegretto group▫ Correlation with diameters (long/short axis)

Preoperative spherical/cylindrical amount, sphero-cylinder ra-tio affecting long axis

▫ Correlation with area Preoperative sphero-cylindrical ratio affects caculated area of

optical zone• Amaris group

▫ Correlation with diameters (long/short axis) Preoperative spherical/cylindrical amount, spherical equiva-

lent, sphero-cylinder ratio and flatter K-value affecting long axis

▫ Correlation with area Preoperative spherical amount, spherical equivalent and falt-

ter K-value affects caculated area of optical zone

Page 11: Ik Hee Ryu , Hun Yang, David S. Kang, Jin  Kuk  Kim BS Clean Vision Eye center

• Under the identical circumstances, different optical zone in diameters and area was ob-served with different types of laser platforms

• To reduce night vision complaints such as glare and halo, preoperative refractive errors, pupil size, corneal thickness and keratometric value must be considered for selecting a proper laser platform and ablation zone