il26-presentationstoryboard presentation design delivery 5 storyboard...

Xavier DÉFAGO (professor)

Tokyo Institute of Technology School of Computing

Presentation

Presentation

What For ?

プレゼンの目的

3

アイデアを

伝わる

プレゼンの作成Identify the

Build an Argument

Form the Story storyboard

Design

Deliver 4

Context Needs Problem

Key Idea AN5/Di19

AN4/Di18

AN3/Di17

AN2/Di16

AN1/Di15

AN0/Di14

An7 An6 An5 An4 An3 An2 An1 An0

100n

100n220µF

1000µF

1000µF 1000µF

47µF

78R05

1k

-

プレゼンの作成Storyboard

Presentation Design

Delivery

5

Storyboard

書くことは混乱した頭を整理するための作業

基本は紙とペン

ポンチ絵を描いてストーリーを作る

細かい作業はあとまわし。まずはスライドの構造を作る。

Presentation ComponentsOverview “What is the presentation about ?” give motivating example state your message

13

Problem Statement

Contribution

Related Work

Assessment

Conclusion

Overview

Presentation Components

Related Work “What did other do so far ?” explain related results

14

Problem Statement

Contribution

Related Work

Assessment

Conclusion

Overview


Problem Statement define your problem state your message

15

Problem Statement

Contribution

Related Work

Assessment

Conclusion

Overview


Contribution present your methodology present your main results

16

Problem Statement

Contribution

Related Work

Assessment

Conclusion

Overview


Assessment evaluate your results analyze

17

Problem Statement

Contribution

Related Work

Assessment

Conclusion

Overview


Conclusion summarize your results state your message

18

Problem Statement

Contribution

Related Work

Assessment

Conclusion

Overview

Presentation Design

スライド×デザイン

伝わる⇒

ウーム，わかる．がんばっているのはわかる

でも，なんと言っていいか，声も出ない

Signal/Noise 比

Noise趣旨の理解に無用な要素

Signal趣旨の理解に有益な要素

Q1: 何がノイズ？

Q1の分析SN比の改善 (1) 枠線×3の除去 (2) グリッドライン×3の除去 (3) 背景色の一致主張の強化色の変更（韓国に注目）凡例，% → 棒グラフのラベル工夫できる点は残っている？

Q2: 何がノイズ？

Q2の分析枠の除去（３箇所）円グラフ: 3D → 2D，縁取り除去，凡例→ラベル標題: 下線除去アイコン除去，会議名縮小

まだ残っている問題点パイの陰と塗り潰し色

Q2: ノイズを列挙しよう

Q2: 改善案背景除去枠除去（標題，グラフ領域）グラフ：3D → 2D，色の除去，注目色，ラベルの表示位置，2007 → ’07，目盛り除去，軸除去

除去ばかり → 削ることで生れる価値 (Short/Simple/Legible)

Signal / Noise

30

このスライドは例外として使います。大切なことを伝いたい時にはやはり長い文章を書いても、実際に伝う情報はかなり少いので、ほとんど無いと考えても同然。なので、違う方法が必要かもしれません。実際、残念ながら、８割の学生がその何も役立たずスライドを書いています。

Signal / Noise

31


Signal / Noise

32


Signal / Noise長い文書少い情報８割の学生

33

Signal / Noise

34

長い文章

少い情報⇒

Signal / Noise

35

Signal / Noise

36

Signal / Noise

37

Contrast

38

私の研究がとても大切






Contrast

39

私の研究が大切












Color Size Font

Contrast (Color)

40

HSV color model

Contrast (Color)

41

Contrast Contrast Contrast





Contrast (Color)

42

Contrast Contrast Contrast Contrast Contrast





Contrast (Color)

43






Contrast (Color)

44






Contrast (Color)

45






Contrast (Color)

46






Data Representation

Signal / Noise

51

Signal / Noise

52

Signal / Noise

53

Guidelines for ChartsMin. Effort for Reader most important aspect how much effort to understand?

Example legend box direct labeling axes labels •eg., “Daily CPU usage” include units •eg., “CPU [seconds]”

54

System Load

Response T

ime

A

B

C

System LoadR

esponse T

ime

B

A

C

Guidelines for ChartsUse Accepted Practice Idea: “present what people expect”

People expect: origin at (0,0) independent variable (cause) along x-axis dependent variable (effect) along y-axis linear scale scale increasing left -> right (and bottom -> top) scale divisions to be equal

55

Guidelines for ChartsAvoid Ambiguity Show coordinate axis, scale divisions, origin Identify individual curves Avoid potential source of misunderstanding

56System Load

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e

A B

Common MistakesMany Variables on One Chart saves space, but harder to read. => message lost better: three different graphs

57Number of users

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e [

ms]

Throughput

Response Time

Utilization

40

30

20

10

100

75

50

25

20

15

10

5

Utilization

[%]

Throughput

[s-1]

Too many variables

Common MistakesSymbols in Place of Text symbols => readers must search text saves writers time ... or not?! •readers skip => writer's time wasted

58λ

R µ = 1

µ = 3

µ = 2

Arrival Rate

Response

time 1 job/sec

3 jobs/sec

2 jobs/sec

Common MistakesLine Chart in Place of Column Chart joining points on line chart => intermediate values can be interpolated

59CPU type

MIPS

8000 8100 8200 8300

Pictorial GamesNonzero Origin emphasize or conceal the difference

60

2600

2625

2650

2675

2700

Mine

Yours

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Mine

Yours

Pictorial GamesDouble-Whammy Graph exaggerate impact

61

Throughput

Response time

Number of users

Pictorial GamesRandom Quant. w/o Confidence Interv. hides variability of the information

62

Mine

Yours

Mine

Yours

Pictorial GamesPictograms Scaled by Height exaggerates the difference

63

MinePerformance = 2

YoursPerformance = 1

Pictorial GamesInappropriate Cell Size in Histograms possible loss of information

64

Freq

uenc

y

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Response time [ms]

[0,2[ [2,4[ [4,6[ [6,8[ [8,10[ [10,12[

Freq

uenc

y

02468

101214161820

Response time [ms]

[0,6[ [6,12[

Pictorial GamesBroken Scales in Column Charts exaggerate difference same as nonzero origin

65

Res

pons

e tim

e [m

s]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

System

A B C D E F

8

9

10

11

12

Res

ponse

tim

e [m

s]

0

1

A B C D E F

System

Delivery

口頭

プレゼン＝あなた

Important Points

69

Be PresentBe Clear

Be ReceptiveBe Confident

Summary

SummaryGeneral presentation = communication identify the key idea

Structure make storyboard

Design signal / noise

Delivery be present & clear

71

ショートトークの好例PresentationZenの序文by Garr Reynolds

72

http://www.slideshare.net/garr/guy-kawasakis-foreword-for-presentation-zen?from_action=save

発表作成PowerPointスライドデザイン宮野公樹 (著)

73

il26-presentationstoryboard presentation design delivery 5 storyboard...

Documents