indonesian most livable city index
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
1/53
+
IAP Indonesian Most Livable
City Index
Bernardus DjonoputroSekretaris Jenderal Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan (IAP)
Chairman
EAROPH Club Indonesia
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
2/53
+ IKATAN AHLI PERENCANAANINDONESIA
IAP merupakan satu-satunya organisasi profesi bidang perencananaanwilayah dan kota di Indonesia, memiliki cabang di 24 provinsi
Dengan Badan Sertifikasi Perencana yang merupakan lembaga independenuntuk sertifikasi profesi
Dengan jumlah planners lebih dari 3000 dan 1,200 orang diantaranyamerupakan planners bersertifikat.
Program Utama:
a. Penguatan kapasitas planner dalam perencanaan &
pembangunan nasional & daerah
b. Indonesia Most Livable City Index
Affiliated organizations:
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
3/53
+ Key Programs2007-today
Becoming more self sufficient, Positive cash flow,audited financial statements
Most Liveable City Index 2009, 2011
Active member of EAROPH
Young Planners Asia Pacific Gathering in Yogyakarta
Professional internship exchange: Malaysia, Australia
Climate change and disaster preparedness projectSTART, with
Annual Rakernas and outbound trainings
Active participant in international events: Earoph,IFHP, Isocarp, Habitat Forums, Asean, World GlobalWater Forum, Global Citie Summit, etc.
Joint co-operations with embassies and mediaorganization.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
4/53
+
Kota = (Peradaban)
For the three-quarters of Europes
population that live in cities and towns, a
good urban environment is a precondition
for a good quality of life. It seems, in part,
that over the last decade, attitudes toliving in cities have been changing. People
are no longer moving away from cities (or
have returned to them), residential
sprawl has slowed and, in a third of cities,
the population is concentrating in city
centres.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
5/53
+Tantangan Kota Masa Kini
Elemen-elemen Lingkungan untuk Kehidupan Yang Berkualitas
As the major function of cities is to provide places for people to trade, produce, communicate and live, the urban environment needs to be assessed froma very specific human perspective: to provide an agreeable place to live while minimising or balancing negative side effects. Quality of life in citiesrelies on a range of components such as social equity, income and welfare, housing, a healthy environment, social relations and education. Theenvironmental elements of good quality of life include good air quality, low noise levels, clean and sufficient water, good u rban design with sufficient andhigh-quality public and green spaces, an agreeable local climate or opportunities to adapt, and social equity. However, urban -specific data are patchy inEurope and, due to different timescales and reporting methods, are seldom directly comparable.
Tekanan Urbanisasi
Many of our cities struggle to cope with social, economic and environmental problems resulting from pressures such as overcrowding or decline, socialinequity, pollution and traffic. The environmental impacts of cities also spread well beyond their physical limits as they rely heavily on outside regions tomeet demand for energy and resources and to accommodate waste. A study of Greater London estimates that London has a footprint 300 times itsgeographical area corresponding to nearly twice the size of the entire UK.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
6/53
+
Tantangan Kota
Masa Kini
Perubahan Iklim
Climate change has the potential to influence almost all components of the urban environment and to raise new,complex challenges for the quality of urban life, health and urban biodiversity. Some cities will experience droughts andhigher temperatures. Others will experience floods. Climate change will affect many aspects of urban living from airquality to consumption patterns (e.g. energy for air conditioning). Poor urban design can aggravate the impacts ofclimate change. Soil sealing, for example, can increase the urban heat island effect. It may also increase water run-offand lack of drainage during heavy rains leading to floods. However, urban design aimed at tackling climate changecould have numerous co-benefits from improved air quality, supporting biodiversity and quality of life.
Kesempatan di Kota
The proximity of people, businesses and services associated with the very word city means there are
also huge opportunities and benefits associated with urban living especially in terms of sustainability and resource use.Already, population density in cities means shorter journeys to work and services, greater use of walking, cycling orpublic transport, and living in apartments of multi-family houses or blocks requiring less heating and less ground space
per person. As a result, urban dwellers on average consume less energy and land for living per capita than ruralresidents.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
7/53
+
Mendisain Kota untuk
Masa Depan
Designing the future
Cities are ecosystems: they are open and dynamicsystems which consume, transform and releasematerials and energy; they develop and adapt;
and they interact with humans and with otherecosystems. They must therefore be managedand protected like any other type of ecosystem.Through rethinking urban design, architecturetransport and planning, we can turn our cities andurban landscapes intourban ecosystemsat theforefront of climate change mitigation (e.g.sustainable transport, clean energy and lowconsumption) and adaptation (e.g. floating
houses, vertical gardens).
Furthermore, better urban planning will improvequality of life across the board by designing quiet,safe, clean and green urban space. It will alsocreate new employment opportunities byenhancing the market for new technologies andgreen architecture. Cities, due to theirconcentration of people and activities, matter forEurope. Also, the problems of cities cannot besolved at the local level alone. Better policyintegration and new governance, involving closerpartnership and co-ordination at local, nationaland European level, are required.
Kota adalah sebuah ekosistemyang harus selalu di kelola dan dilindungi seperti ekosistem-ekosistem lainnya.
Dengan mengembangkan cara lkitamerencana dan mendisain kota,
merancang transportasi denganlebih baik, akan memperbaikikualitas hidup keseluruhan.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
8/53
+
Indonesian Cities The
Urbanizing Phenomena
Pada tahun 2008, untuk pertama kalinyadalam sejarah peradaban Indonesia,
penduduk perkotaan melebihi pedesaan.
Hari ini, lebih dari 39 perkotaan Indonesia
berpenduduk diatas 1 juta.
Age 100+
Age 0
Di Indonesia, lebih dari 60% populasi berumur dibawah 39 tahun,
menjadikan negara yang potensial produktif.
51%urban
30%urban
2008 2030
65%urban
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
9/53
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
10/53
+
Infrastructure quality in selected Asian countries (GlobalCompetitiveness Report, 2010-2011)
Country Singapore Malaysia Thailand China Indonesia India Philippines
Roads 6.6 5.7 5.1 4.3 3.5 3.3 2.8
Railroad 5.8 4.7 3.0 4.3 3.0 4.6 1.7
Seaport 6.8 5.6 5.0 4.3 3.6 3.9 2.8
Air transport 6.9 5.9 5.9 4.4 4.6 4.6 3.6
Electricity 6.7 5.7 5.7 5.3 3.6 3.1 3.4
Score (out of 7)* 6.6 5.5 4.9 4.1 3.7 3.6 3.2
* 1 = extremely under-developed; 7 = efficient by international standards
Source: World Economic Forum, Standard Chartered Global Research
Poor infrastructure
conditions are the
main factor
preventing
Indonesia s
economy from
growing at its
potential rate of 7 -
8%.
The Global Competitiveness Report ranked Indonesia 90th among 139countries due to poor state of various aspects of its infrastructures.
Poor Infrastructure
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
11/53
+
Source: Government Medium Term Plan 2010-2014 and Bappenas
The National Development Planning Board
(Bappenas) has stated that around USD143 billion
(or 3% of GDP) will be needed for infrastructure
development in 2010-2014 in order to meet the
countrys economic growth target of 6% - 7% per
annum from 2010 - 2014.
The GapUSD143bn
USD50bn
USD93bn
Infrastructure InvestmentNeeds
State Budget FundingGap
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
12/53
+
ALPHA ++
ALPHA+
ALPHA
Alpha ++ World Cities : New York dan London.
Alpha + World Cities : Chicago, Dubai,Hongkong, Paris, Shanghai, Singapore,Sydney, Tokyo.
Alpha World Cities :
Amsterdam, Beijing,Brussels, Buenos Aires,Frankfurt, Jakarta, KualaLumpur, Los Angeles,Madrid, Mexico City, Milan,Moscow, Mumbai, San
Fransisco, Sao Paulo,Seoul, Toronto, Washington.
This means Jakarta as a megacity has a strategicpositioning & influences inglobal interaction.
The Globalization and World Cities Study
Group, Geographic Faculty, Loughboroughuniversity, UK, 2010
JAKARTA AS GLOBAL CITIES :GaWC Survey 2010
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
13/53
+Kota = TidakNyaman
Mayoritas kondisi kota-kota besar di Indonesia dinilai
tidak nyaman oleh warganya.Berdasarkan surveyyang dilakukan di 15 kota besar, diketahui bahwa
nilai rata-rata (mean) indeks kenyamanan kota
adalah 54,26. Indeks dengan persepsi tingkat
kenyamanan tertinggi di Kota Yogyakarta (66,52) dan
Kota Denpasar (63.63). Sedangkan dan persepsi
kenyamanan warga yang paling rendah adalah Kota
Medan (46,67) dan Kota Pontianak (46.92).Kota kota dengan indeks diatas ratarata adalah :
Yogyakarta, Denpasar, Makassar, Menado, Surabaya
dan Semarang. Sedangkan kota kota dengan
indeks dibawah rata-rata adalah Banjarmasin,
Batam, Jayapura, Bandung, Palembang,Palangkaraya, Jakarta, Pontianak dan Medan.
IAP Indonesian Most Livable City Index 2009/2011
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
14/53
+
Principles of Livable City :
a. The provision of basic needs (decent housing, water supply,electricity)
b. Availability of public facilities and social amenities (public transport,
city parks, religious facilities / public health facilities)c. Availability of public space to interact between communities
d. Security
e. Supports the function of economic, social and cultural of the city
f. Sanitation
LIVABLE CITYLivable Cityis a term that describe a comfortable environment and
atmosphere of the city as a place to live and work, viewed forvarious aspects of both physically (urban facilities, infrastructure,spatial planning, etc.) as well as non-physically (social relations,economic activities, etc.).
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
15/53
+IAP MOST LIVABLE CITY INDEX
Perception-based survey of the urban population, about thelivability of their city.
The results of this study is a "snapshot
MLCI IAP is the first perception-based survey index of thecitys livability and planned to be carried out annually andhopefully it will be a benchmark for quality of life in citiesthroughout Indonesia
This index also act as a feedback to stakeholders in theplanning process and urban development.
The advantages of this index: Simple, Actual, Snapshot.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
16/53
+
IAP-MLCI
Surveyed Criteria
and Livabillity
factors:
Physical aspects, including availability of Greenspace and quality of urban design
Environmental aspects: polutions, wastemanagement, cleanliness of te city
Transportation: how well the city is served bypublic transport, including quality of your roads
Public Health: availability and accessibility tohealth facilities
Public Educations: availability and accessibility ofschools and other educational facilities.
Quality and availability of city infrastructureincluding utilieits, drinking water, power, andtelecommunications.
Economic conditions, availability of work andaccessibility from home to work place
Security and safety
Neighborhood interactions, social and culturalinteractions
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
17/53
+
52,28
51,90
56,37
65,34
52,52
53,13
43,65
52,04
52,61
56,52
59,90
53,86
Only 54.17% of the population in Indonesian cities surveyed feel comfortable living in theircity. This shows that those cities are still not ideal IAP
Average Livability Index of IndonesianCities in 2009 : 54,17%
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
18/53
+
46.67
50.71
54,19
66,52
54.67
56.38
46.92
53,16
56,39
53
53
58
58
64
45.74% of the population in Indonesian cities surveyed feel ther cities are less livable.
Average Livability Index of IndonesianCities in 2011: 54.26%
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
19/53
+
MOST LIVABLE CITY INDEX 2009 & 2011
NO CITY 2009 2011
1 Yogyakarta 65,34 66.52
2 Denpasar 63.63
3 Makasar 56,52 58.46
4 Manado 59,90 56.39
5 Surabaya 53,13 56.38
6 Semarang 52,52 54.63
7 Banjarmasin 52,61 53.16
8 Batam 52.60
9 Jayapura 53,86 52.5610 Bandung 56,37 52.32
11 Palembang 52.15
12 Palangkaraya 52,04 50.86
13 Jakarta 51,90 50.71
14 Pontianak 43,65 46.92
15 Medan 52,28 46.67
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
20/53
+
Key Findings:Cities are
struggling
But there are 6 cities that are perceived asless livable compared to 2009, namelyManado (1 million), Jayapura (300,000),Bandung (2.5 million),
Palangkaraya(400,000), Jakarta (15 million),and Medan (2.1 million)
The following are key areas that the publicperceived as most important aspects indetermining livability of their city, namely :
economic(27 ,97 %)
spatial plan/urban design (19,66 %),
Availability of education facility (13,29%),
Safety and security (11,08%)
waste management (10,80%)
Livability index of Indonesiancities (mean) is at 54.26, arelatively no change
compared to the 2009 survey(54.17).
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
21/53
+ Aspect Perception (%)Physical/Urban design 28.63
Environment 34.32Security & Safety 37.09
Economy 41.84
Social & Cultural 48.91
Transportation 49.56
Public utilities 68.18
Public Health 71.03
Education 72.63
Key Findings: physicalstate of Indonesian cities
a concern
A total of 45% percent of respondentsliving in Indonesian cities todayperceived their cities as less livable.
Key areas that has the lowest scoreinclude: physical aspect,environmental aspect and security &safety.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
22/53
+
These cities are
mostly old andtraditionally-well-preserved cities,strong indigenousethnic communities,and mostly areknown as
education/universitycities rather thanindustrialized/commercial centers, aremore livable than theaverage Indonesiancities.
Key findings: some cities isjust gets better.
Cities Index Above Average :
Yogyakarta (65.34), Manado
(59.9), Makassar (56.52),Bandung (56.37) is perceived asmost livable cities, more than theaverage Indonesian cities.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
23/53
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
24/53
49%
43%
26%
30%
33%
15% 16%
30%
9%
36%
54%
12%
21%
6%
51%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
PHYSICAL ASPECTS Mean = 28,63
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
25/53
57%
28%
37%
47%
25%
37%
26%29%
19%
49%
40%
17%
30%
18%
55%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT Mean = 34,32
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
26/53
68%
56%58%
65%
49%
57%
47%
58%
35%
48% 48%
35% 35%
40%
45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
TRANSPORTATION ASPECT Mean = 49,56
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
27/53
94% 94%
79%
65%
83%
91%
81%
56%
69%72%
39%
71%
65%
58%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITY Mean = 71,03
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
28/53
98%
86%
77%
70%
92%
64%
83%
59%
83%
74%
40%
72%
64%66%
61%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
EDUCATION FACILITY Mean = 72.63
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
29/53
83% 83%
71%
60%
73%
80%79%
61%
77%
68% 67% 71%
41%
56%54%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
INFRASTRUCTURE & FACILITY Mean = 68,18
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
30/53
59%
51%
37%40%
60%
43%
39% 39%
29% 29%35%
26%
36%
31%
75%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
ECONOMY Mean = 41.84
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
31/53
59% 60%
35% 36%33%
52%56%
26%
36%
18%
42%
19%
34%
9%
40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
SECURITY & SAFETY Mean = 37,69
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
32/53
73%75%
66%
54%
41% 40%42%
50%51%
40%
45%
53%
37%
31%
36%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
SOCIAL & CULTURAL ASPECT Mean = 48,91
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
33/53
+
SNAPSHOT IS GOOD
Walaupun Indonesia memilikifenomena ekonomi yangmengagumkan, kota-kota utama di
Indonesia saat ini kesulitan untukmenjadi kota nyaman yang ideal.Hal ini membutuhkan keberanianbertindak, inovasi dan pemikiranprogresif dari para manajer kota,terutama Walikota, untuk mengambilkebijakan-kebijakan yang tegas dalampembangunan kota.
Pemimpin kota harus memilki visi,kepemimpinan dan dukungan kuat
warga untuk merealisasikanidentitas kota masa depanIndonesia: Kota yang Nyaman.
Simple and ActualSnapshot of theperceptions of urbanpopulations describedin this index shows:
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
34/53
+
SNAPSHOT ISGOOD
Kenyaman (Livability) kota adalah haksemua warga. Para manajer kota danpemerintah harus segera mengadopsikebijakan dan opendekatan yang benar
dan mumpuni.
Mandat politik di era demokrasi baru inimerupakan kesempatan emas untukmerencana, membangun danmengendalikan/mengawasi
pembangunan. Pada saat bersamaan, para warga kota
harus beradaptasi dengan pola hidupurban (bukan kampung), untukmenjadikan kota lebih nyaman.
Masa depan kota-kota Indonesia akanmenghadapi tantangan lebih besar:perlunya membangun infrastruktur danbertumbuh nya demokrasi di level lokal.
Simple and ActualSnapshot of theperceptions of urbanpopulations describedin this index shows:
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
35/53
+Tantangan bagi Kota Indonesia
Infrastruktur
KEMACETAN
BANJIR
R T H
PERUBAHAN IKLIM
DAN BENCANA
PERUMAHAN DAN
PERMUKIMAN
SAMPAH, AIR BERSIH,
LIMBAH, DAN ENERGI
Target Jumlah Penduduk
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
36/53
+
Perencanaan Kota
Berbasis Stakeholder
1. Pengelolaan Pertumbuhan(Growth Management), bukanPembangunan biasa.
2. Basis Perencanaan
Fungsional adalahMegalopolitan
3. Pergeseran Dari DiscretionarySystem Ke Regulatory System
DesignTeknis
Engineering
Dampak
LingkunganPelayananPublik
Dampak
Sosial
Produk
Rencana
RuangPerkotaan
CITIZEN
CHARTER
DesignTeknis
Engineering
Dampak
LingkunganPelayananPublik
Dampak
Sosial
Produk
Rencana
RuangPerkotaan
DesignTeknis
Engineering
Dampak
LingkunganPelayananPublik
Dampak
Sosial
Produk
Rencana
RuangPerkotaan
CITIZEN
CHARTER
Livability harus merupakan landasanukur sebagai bagian dari CitizenCharter, dengan ber fokus komitmentmanajer kota untuk melayani warganya.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
37/53
+2013 MLCI Survey Partnership Opportunity
To further enhanced the impact of this Index, IAP is puttingforward a proposal for partnership in the 2013 survey andbeyond.
Improvement to the Index includes application of morecomprehensive survey methodology in more cities.
The 2013 research will see an increase of sample in eachcities, and add the number of cities to 24.
The analysis will include ordinal utility of main aspects ofthe survey. Further analysis will also connects the priority ofeach aspect with attribute of respondents, ie. Younger/older
age group, gender, income group, etc.
Preliminary discussion to support the survey: Embassy ofDenmark, Embassy of Sweden, Austrade, KementrianLingkungan Hidup.
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
38/53
Terima Kasih
Urban community perception for all aspects
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
39/53
Urban community perception for all aspects:
> 5 Juta Jiwa
1 5 Juta Jiwa
100 rb 500 rb jiwa
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
40/53
52%
46%
69%
45%
73%
55%
89%
54%
94%
93%
97%
98%
80%
81%78%
95%
29%
55%
92%
59%
93%
91%
32%
69%
76%
77%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
YOGYAKARTA
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
41/53
46%
40%
44%
13%
48%
52%
60%
64%
92%
96%
84%
88%
100%
67%76%
88%
56%
40%
56%
60%
88%
76%
60%
76%
72%
80%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
DENPASAR
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
42/53
33%
19%
41%
34%
88%
54%
55%
34%
78%
80%
81%
73%
69%
60%
66%
89%
32%
23%
58%
35%
95%
81%
35%
53%
66%
65%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
MAKASSAR
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
43/53
32%
27%
53%
41%
82%
69%
61%
48%
69%
60%
73%
67%
41%
48%
64%
87%
23%
34%
64%
36%
100%
77%
27%
27%
39%
55%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
MENADO
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
44/53
46%
21%
42%
8%
75%
13%
63%
46%
83%
83%
92%
92%
92%
67%42%
92%
42%
58%
79%
33%
75%
91%
13%
22%
13%
30%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air BersihKualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
SURABAYA
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
45/53
13%
17%
41%
33%
78%
48%
70%
30%
100%
83%
33%
96%
91%
61%
70%
100%
30%
39%
60%
52%
74%
73%
9%
30%
26%
26%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
SEMARANG
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
46/53
18%
14%
32%
19%
63%
47%
49%
27%
81%
81%
85%
80%
42%
87%
93%
92%
28%
23%
66%
56%
89%
81%
23%
39%
17%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
BANJARMASIN
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
47/53
56%
46%
71%
40%
54%
48%
40%
40%
31%
69%
60%
63%
69%
38%
40%
71%
75%
65%
85%
40%
56%
36%
52%
64%
8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
BATAM
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
48/53
3%
14%
24%
14%
55%
31%
34%
21%
79%
59%
90%
76%
100%
45%
62%
100%
24%
14%
48%
36%
79%
82%
7%
24%
59%
57%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan UmumKualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
BANDUNG
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
49/53
43%
28%
66%
33%
60%
34%
59%
39%
72%
72%
76%
73%
43%
67%
70%
90%
16%
8%
64%
18%
81%
60%
16%
45%
12%
23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
PALEMBANG
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
50/53
60%
47%
47%
34%
53%
49%51%
39%
35%
42%
39%
40%
44%
76%
77%
73%
27%
26%
51%
42%
75%
69%
39%
54%
17%
18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan UmumKualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
PALANGKARAYA
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
51/53
15%
9%
24%
9%
54%
18%
48%
21%
73%
69%
74%
71%
79%
61%56%
86%
28%
7%
43%
19%
64%
68%
14%
34%
67%
72%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air BersihKualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
JAKARTA
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
52/53
19%
22%
30%
30%
40%
34%
37%
30%
64%
66%
64%
64%
31%
28%27%
78%
22%
15%
70%
34%
83%
64%
9%
29%
9%
30%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air BersihKualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
PONTIANAK
-
7/30/2019 Indonesian Most Livable City Index
53/53
5%
7%
21%
14%
81%
28%35%
16%
67%
49%
72%
60%
28%
53%
47%
95%
17%
14%
61%
9%
72%
53%
2%
9%
21%
26%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Kualitas Penataan Kota
Jumlah Ruang Terbuka
Kualitas Kebersihan Lingkungan
Tingkat Pencemaran Lingkungan
Ketersediaan Angkutan Umum
Kualitas Angkutan UmumKualitas Kondisi Jalan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan
Kualitas Fasilitas Kesehatan
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Pendidikan
Kualitas Fasilitas Pendidikan
Ketersediaan Energi Listrik
Ketersediaan Air Bersih
Kualitas Air Bersih
Kualitas Jaringan Telekomunikasi
Ketersediaan Lapangan Pekerjaan
Tingkat Biaya Hidup
Tingkat Aksesibilitas Tempat Kerja
Tingkat Kriminalitas
Interaksi Hubungan Antar Penduduk
Informasi Pelayanan Publik
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kaum Diffable
Perlindungan Bangunan Bersejarah
Ketersediaan Fasilitas Rekreasi
Kualitas Fasilitas Rekreasi
MEDAN