infrared studies of single-crystal la_2−x,sr_xcuo_4−δ and yba_2cu_3o_7−δ

6
Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 403 Infrared studies of single-crystal La 2 _,SrxCuO 4 -b and YBa 2 Cu 3 07-6 A. C. Nichol, F. L. Pratt, W. Hayes, C. Chen, B. E. Watts, and B. M. Wanklyn Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK Received September 27, 1988; accepted November 29, 1988 Polarized infrared reflectance measurements are reported for crystals of La2s-SrxCuO4-6 and YBa2Cu30 7 -6. Free- carrier reflectance is observed in the copper oxide planes, and strong phonons are observed in the perpendicular direction. The interpretation of the infrared optical properties is discussed. INTRODUCTION The high-T, superconductors La 2 _Sr.CuO4-b (LSCO) (x 0.15) and YBa 2 Cu30 7 -6 (YBCO) have been studied inten- sively by using a wide range of techniques. Studies by infra- red reflection spectroscopy have sought first to verify the existence of a superconducting energy gap and second to investigate general electronic excitations of these materials. The lack of large crystals suitable for infrared studies has been a problem, and the majority of measurements have been made on polycrystalline samples. However, correct analysis of polycrystalline measurements must take into ac- count the anisotropy of the crystallites, and the necessary information can be obtained only from single-crystal mea- surements. In this paper we present infrared reflectance measurements on single crystals and discuss the information that can be obtained regarding the electronic structure from such measurements. This investigation is primarily concerned with the elec- tronic properties of the normal state, although some mea- surements of the temperature dependence of the reflectance of superconducting YBCOare briefly discussed. The start- ing point for discussion of the optical properties is a dielec- tric function of the simple Drude form for free carriers: E(X) = e - W 2 /O(W + iy), (1) where cp is the unscreened plasma frequency, which is relat- ed to the carrier density n and effective mass m* by cop 2 = ne2/(f0M*); y is the scattering rate; and E is the background dielectric constant due to high-energy electronic excitations. There may be departures from Eq. (1) because of many-body effects, but it may still be used to describe the dielectric function if up and y are permitted to be frequency depen- dent. Additional contributions to E(w) from a possible inter- band transition, eib(co), and from phonons, Eph(W), may be added to the right-hand side of Eq. (1) in the form of Lorentz- ian oscillators: Eib(CO) = [b 2 /(Wib 2 - 2 - iC07b)], (2a) Eph(W) = E [n'/(wn 2 - W2 - iY)], (2b) n where Qib represents the oscillator strength of the interband transition; Wib is the center frequency; Yib is the width; and for the phonons, , 0, and y, represent the TO frequency, the oscillator strength, and the width, respectively. EXPERIMENT The single crystals were obtained by flux growth, CuO flux for LSCO' and CuO/BaO flux for YBCO. 2 The largest LSCO crystals had dimensions as great as several millime- ters in each direction, whereas the YBCO crystals were al- ways smaller, the largest being in the form of ab-oriented plates -1.5 mm square and -50 Atm thick. For the far- infrared measurements (20-500 cm-') an RIIC Beckman FS720 Fourier-transform interferometer was used in con- junction with a helium-cooled composite bolometer. In the middle-infrared region (400-4300 cm-') a Perkin-Elmer 1710 Fourier-transform spectrometer was used, and for the range 4000-30 000 cm-1 a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 9 grating spectrometer was used. For low-temperature measure- ments, samples were held in an Oxford Instruments continu- ous-flow cryostat, and the reflectivity was obtained by nor- malizing to an Al or brass reference mirror held in the cryo- stat along with the sample. A Specac beam condenser was used in conjunction with suitable polarizers to measure the polarized reflectance. The angle of incidence was in the region 15° to -300, depending on the measuring system. Absolute values for the reflectance were difficult to obtain; this is due primarily to the small size and variable surface quality of the crystals. This uncertainty in the absolute value was taken into account in the fitting procedures by using a normalizing factor to optimize the fit. For the large LSCO crystals, the normalizing correction was only a few percent, whereas for the smaller YBCO crystals it could be several tens of percent. The measured anisotropy and fre- quency dependence of the reflectance would not, however, be affected by uncertainty in the absolute-reflectance mag- nitude. The La-Sr ratio was determined by electron-probe micro- analysis; 0 contents were not determined. Orientation of crystals and confirmation of the structure were determined by x-ray diffraction. Superconducting transition tempera- tures for the singlecrystals were determined by the Meissner effect; the main flux exclusion occurred at -8 K for the 0740-3224/89/030403-06$02.00 1989 Optical Society of America Nichol et al.

Upload: b-m

Post on 08-Oct-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 403

Infrared studies of single-crystal La2_,SrxCuO4-b andYBa2Cu307-6

A. C. Nichol, F. L. Pratt, W. Hayes, C. Chen, B. E. Watts, and B. M. Wanklyn

Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK

Received September 27, 1988; accepted November 29, 1988

Polarized infrared reflectance measurements are reported for crystals of La2s-SrxCuO4-6 and YBa2Cu30 7 -6. Free-carrier reflectance is observed in the copper oxide planes, and strong phonons are observed in the perpendiculardirection. The interpretation of the infrared optical properties is discussed.

INTRODUCTION

The high-T, superconductors La2 _Sr.CuO4-b (LSCO) (x0.15) and YBa 2Cu30 7 -6 (YBCO) have been studied inten-sively by using a wide range of techniques. Studies by infra-red reflection spectroscopy have sought first to verify theexistence of a superconducting energy gap and second toinvestigate general electronic excitations of these materials.The lack of large crystals suitable for infrared studies hasbeen a problem, and the majority of measurements havebeen made on polycrystalline samples. However, correctanalysis of polycrystalline measurements must take into ac-count the anisotropy of the crystallites, and the necessaryinformation can be obtained only from single-crystal mea-surements. In this paper we present infrared reflectancemeasurements on single crystals and discuss the informationthat can be obtained regarding the electronic structure fromsuch measurements.

This investigation is primarily concerned with the elec-tronic properties of the normal state, although some mea-surements of the temperature dependence of the reflectanceof superconducting YBCO are briefly discussed. The start-ing point for discussion of the optical properties is a dielec-tric function of the simple Drude form for free carriers:

E(X) = e - W 2/O(W + iy), (1)

where cp is the unscreened plasma frequency, which is relat-ed to the carrier density n and effective mass m* by cop2 =ne2/(f0M*); y is the scattering rate; and E is the backgrounddielectric constant due to high-energy electronic excitations.There may be departures from Eq. (1) because of many-bodyeffects, but it may still be used to describe the dielectricfunction if up and y are permitted to be frequency depen-dent. Additional contributions to E(w) from a possible inter-band transition, eib(co), and from phonons, Eph(W), may beadded to the right-hand side of Eq. (1) in the form of Lorentz-ian oscillators:

Eib(CO) = [b 2/(Wib2 - 2 - iC07b)], (2a)

Eph(W) = E [n'/(wn 2- W2 - iY)], (2b)

n

where Qib represents the oscillator strength of the interband

transition; Wib is the center frequency; Yib is the width; andfor the phonons, , 0, and y, represent the TO frequency,the oscillator strength, and the width, respectively.

EXPERIMENT

The single crystals were obtained by flux growth, CuO fluxfor LSCO' and CuO/BaO flux for YBCO.2 The largestLSCO crystals had dimensions as great as several millime-ters in each direction, whereas the YBCO crystals were al-ways smaller, the largest being in the form of ab-orientedplates -1.5 mm square and -50 Atm thick. For the far-infrared measurements (20-500 cm-') an RIIC BeckmanFS720 Fourier-transform interferometer was used in con-junction with a helium-cooled composite bolometer. In themiddle-infrared region (400-4300 cm-') a Perkin-Elmer1710 Fourier-transform spectrometer was used, and for therange 4000-30 000 cm-1 a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 9 gratingspectrometer was used. For low-temperature measure-ments, samples were held in an Oxford Instruments continu-ous-flow cryostat, and the reflectivity was obtained by nor-malizing to an Al or brass reference mirror held in the cryo-stat along with the sample. A Specac beam condenser wasused in conjunction with suitable polarizers to measure thepolarized reflectance. The angle of incidence was in theregion 15° to -300, depending on the measuring system.Absolute values for the reflectance were difficult to obtain;this is due primarily to the small size and variable surfacequality of the crystals. This uncertainty in the absolutevalue was taken into account in the fitting procedures byusing a normalizing factor to optimize the fit. For the largeLSCO crystals, the normalizing correction was only a fewpercent, whereas for the smaller YBCO crystals it could beseveral tens of percent. The measured anisotropy and fre-quency dependence of the reflectance would not, however,be affected by uncertainty in the absolute-reflectance mag-nitude.

The La-Sr ratio was determined by electron-probe micro-analysis; 0 contents were not determined. Orientation ofcrystals and confirmation of the structure were determinedby x-ray diffraction. Superconducting transition tempera-tures for the single crystals were determined by the Meissnereffect; the main flux exclusion occurred at -8 K for the

0740-3224/89/030403-06$02.00 (© 1989 Optical Society of America

Nichol et al.

404 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989

LSCO crystals and at -65 K for the YBCO crystals. Theserelatively low transition temperatures indicate a low 0 con-tent in the bulk of the crystals.

Measurements were made both on original as-grown crys-tal faces and on cut and polished faces for the LSCO crystals;the YBCO crystals were too small and fragile for such sur-face treatment. Two effects on the reflectance were ob-served as a result of polishing:

(1) Where a large plasma reflectance was seen on theoriginal surface, a lower plasma frequency was observed onpolishing down into the bulk of the crystal; this indicatesthat 0 only penetrated a thin surface layer in the annealingprocess.

(2) Polishing was also found to reduce frequency-depen-dent scattering due to a rough surface; such scattering typi-cally reduced the observed reflectance by -50% at 4000cm'.

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

C)

a:

La 2 _.SrCuO4-5 REFLECTANCE

The lattice structure of the high-T, superconductors sug-gests that the electronic properties will be highly aniso-tropic, and hence an anisotropic reflectance is expected.Such reflectance anisotropy has been reported in single crys-tals of both the related compound La2NiO4 (Ref. 3) and alsoin La2CuO4 ,4 and anisotropy has been assumed in the reflec-tance analysis of polycrystalline LSCO.5 -7

A direct measurement at room temperature of the reflec-tance anisotropy of the ac face of a single crystal of LSCO,which had been aligned, cut, and polished, is shown in Figs.1(a) and 1(b). For radiation polarized perpendicularly to c,the reflectance is dominated by free carriers; weak phononfeatures observed here appear to be due to incomplete rejec-tion of the strong c-polarized phonons. The reflectance canbe fitted in the region above 1000 cm-' by a highly dampedDrude term. No 0 annealing had been carried out on the

100

90

00

a:

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

00 200 400 600 800 1000

Wave number

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

00

100

90

80

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Wave number

70

0C

a:

60

50

40

30

20

10

01000 2000 3000 4000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Wave number Wave number

Fig. 1. The infrared reflectance of an aligned, cut, and polished crystal of LSCO at 300 K for an ac face with E Ic and E | a (a) in the region be-low 1000 cm', (b) in the region 400-4300 cm-1. (c) A Drude model fit to the ac-face reflectance with E a, fitted in the region 1000-4300 cml,and (d) reflectance of an ab face with E II a.

0D0

a:

(b)

Elc

ElkcI,-

(d)

. . . . . . .

Nichol et al.

Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 405

Table 1. Electron and Phonon Parameters Consistent with the Observed Reflectance of Single-Crystal LSCO

Drude Parameters Phonon Parameters Interband ParametersWP CWn 'Yn n COib 'Yib Qib

Face (Polarization) (cm-l) (cm-') E (cm') (cm-') (cm-') (cm-,) (cm'1) (cm-')

ac (E||c) - - 3 232 60 750(polished) 505 45 250 - - -

ac (E ll a) 7.6X103 1.5X104 3 - - -

(polished)ab (E |l a), 7.6X 103 1.1X10 4 4 - - - 3.5X103 7.0X103 4.5X 103

(polished)ab (E |l a) 2.0X10 4 1.0X10 4 4 - - -

(unpolished)ab (E ll a) 4.6X 103 8 X 102 4 - - - 3.5X103 1.0 X 103 5.5 X 103

(unpolished,heat treated)

crystal after polishing, and the plasma frequency and carrierconcentration are consequently quite low (see Table 1). Atfrequencies below 1000 cm-' the reflectance is higher thanexpected from the Drude fit to the reflectance at higherfrequencies [Fig. 1(c)].

For radiation polarized in the c direction, the reflectanceis typical of an insulator and is dominated by phonons.There are two strong c-polarized phonons, and their fre-quencies and widths as obtained from Kramers-Kroniganalysis of the reflectance are listed in Table 1. Thesephonons correspond to the c-axis phonons reported at 240and 501 cm-' in single-crystal La2 CuO4 ,4 which result fromin-phase and out-of-phase motion of successive 0 layers.The reflectance up to 4300 cm-' is shown both for an ac face[Fig. 1(b)] and an ab face [Fig. 1(d)]. The ab-face reflec-tance has vibrational structure visible, which is not presentfor E I c on the ac face [Fig. 1(b)]; we suggest that thesephonons are due to the presence of insulating regions on theab face.

For c polarization there is no indication of any absorptionnear 0.5 eV (-4000 cm-'); previous measurements on poly-crystalline material have indicated a broad electronic ab-sorption at this energy, which appeared to be correlated withthe carrier concentration.8 The only evidence for this ab-sorption band is in the ab reflectance [Fig. 1(d)], where itcould explain the relatively high reflectance near 4000 cm-';however, the mode has to be broad to give the featurelessreflectance seen in this region (see Table 1). The reflec-tance for the ac face with polarization E I c shows no sign ofthis mode.

Further information on the properties of the 0.5-eV modeis obtained from a study of the effect on the ab-face reflec-tance of annealing at 900'C in air for 180 h (Fig. 2). Thefree-carrier plasma frequency is observed to shift to lowerfrequency while a strong-reflectance feature appears near0.5 eV. At the same time, phonon structure in the form ofdips in the reflectance appears in the spectrum near 500 and1000 cm-'; these dips are the result of absorption in a semi-transparent insulating layer that has formed on the surfaceof the crystal. These results suggest that the 0.5-eV modemay not be related directly to free carriers but rather may beassociated with an insulating region in the sample, probablyhighly 0 deficient, which forms on exposed ab-oriented crys-tal surfaces (a similar heat treatment in flowing 02 gave noindication of any reflectance feature at 0.5 eV).

A broad absorption peak near 0.5 eV has also been ob-served as a result of photoexcitation of La 2CuO 4-6 at 2.6 eV,9

and so this mode has been observed in several differentexperiments. However, there is no conclusive evidence atpresent that it is an intrinsic excitation of the carriers re-sponsible for the superconductivity, and we suspect that it isin fact a transition associated with an extrinsic state in theenergy gap of insulating regions in the sample. The pres-ence of unscreened phonon structure in the ab reflectance[Fig. 1(d)] offers clear evidence that such regions exist. Fur-ther studies are required to settle this question.

YBa2Cu 3O7- REFLECTANCE

The reflectance of the ab face of a YBCO crystal at roomtemperature is shown in Fig. 3, both before and after anneal-ing in 0. Before annealing [Fig. 3, curve (a)] phonons arevisible in the reflectance as well as interference fringes,which indicates the relatively low absorption in the insulat-

100

80

a)

0

60

40

20

00 1000 2000 3000 4000

Wave number

Fig. 2. Reflectance of an unpolished ab face of LSCO crystal at 300K; dotted curve, as grown; solid curve, after 180 h at 900°C in air.

. . . . . . . . .

Nichol et al.

406 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

a)

30

20

10

00 1000 2000 3000 4000

Wave number

Fig. 3. Infrared reflectance of a single crystal of YBCO at 300 K foran ab face: curve (a), before annealing; curve (b), after annealingfor 4 days at 600'C in 02. [The spectrum of curve (b) is considera-bly more noisy than that of curve (a)].

100

90

80

70

a,

C

.)a)

a:

60

50

40

30

20

10

00 4000 8000 12000 16000

Wave numberFig. 4. Reflectance at 300 K of an ab face of an O-annealed YBCOcrystal in the range 400-16 000 cm-' together with a Drude fit to thereflectance.

Table 2. Electron and Phonon Parameters Consistentwith the Observed Reflectance of Single-Crystal

YBCO

Drude Parameters Phonon ParametersFace Cp C Wn 'Yn On

(Polarization) (cm-') (cm-') (cm-') (cm-') (cm-')

ab (E 11 alE 1l b) 1.7 X 104 4.8 X 10' 3.5 - - -

ab (Ela/El 1b) - - - 594 25 330(unannealed)

ing state. After annealing [Fig. 3 curve (b)], the phonons arescreened by free carriers, and there is a pronounced free-carrier reflectance. The reflectance in the annealed crystalover the range 400-16 000 cm-' is shown in Fig. 4 togetherwith a Drude fit (see Table 2); the Drude parameters arecomparable with those reported by Schlesinger et al.10 forsuperconducting single-crystal YBCO. Departures fromDrude reflectance are seen near 10 000 cm-', possibly be-cause of interband transitions. Although we have used aDrude model to fit the ab reflectance, we note that it is alsopossible to fit the YBCO reflectance with a combination ofinterband and lower-frequency intraband terms in the di-electric function, as suggested by Tanner et al." The pro-posed interband term would have to be broad compared withits center frequency, and such a term would essentially beindistinguishable from a second Drude contribution to thedielectric function. Because of the broad nature of the re-flectance features it is difficult to distinguish between theabove interpretations.

TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OFREFLECTANCE

A number of workers have looked for the presence of anenergy gap in the infrared by looking at the ratio of reflec-tance above and below the superconducting transition bothin LSCO12-18 and in YBCO.6"l", 9-24 An increase in low-frequency reflectance is generally observed in the supercon-ducting state, but the reflectance does not increase to unityas would be expected below an energy gap, according toMattis-Bardeen electrodynamics. 25 This could be the re-sult of a reduced overall reflectance due to surface rough-ness, but such effects tend not to be important at frequenciesbelow approximately 500 cm-'. One approach to explainingthis behavior is to assume that only part of the surface of thesample becomes superconducting because of inhomogeneity.A reduced reflectance change also follows from consider-ation of the effective dielectric function of the polycrystal-line surface modeled by using the effective-medium approxi-mation26 27; the small reflectance change occurs because thereflectance of ab-oriented crystallites is already high, andany increased reflectance due to the onset of superconduc-tivity can only bring about a small fractional change in theoverall reflectance. At the same time, the frequencies andwidths of the phonon modes may also be temperature depen-dent, giving rise to substantial changes in the observed re-flectivity. Another source of reflectance change on goinginto the superconducting state, proposed by Bonn et a.,17results from a zero crossing of the real part of the dielectricfunction because of the superconducting plasma responseand is not directly related to excitation across the supercon-ducting energy gap.

The temperature dependence of the reflectance of the abface of a superconducting YBCO crystal (T - 70 K) wasstudied down to 14 K in the region 400-4300 cm-'. Nosignificant changes could be observed in the reflectance inthis region; the stability of the experiment was such thatreflectance changes of >1% in the region of 500 cm-' wouldbe observable. This result is in contrast to a previouslyreported reflectance increase of -4% near 500 cm-', fromjust above to well below T, in crystals with T - 92 K.'0"'

r_

. . . . . . . . .

Nichol et al.

(a)

Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989/J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 407

DISCUSSION

Departures from Drude fits to the middle-infrared region(>1000 cm-') are seen on going to lower frequencies (<1000cm'1), particularly for LSCO [Fig. 1(c)], which indicate thatmore than a single Drude term is required in the dielectricfunction. The term dominating the region above 1000 cm-'may take the form of either a Drude term with a largescattering rate or a broad interband transition. The plasmafrequencies we observe after 0 annealing give carrier con-centrations of 3.4 X 1021 cm-3 for YBCO and 4.5 X 1021 cm3

for LSCO if the effective mass is taken as m* me. Thecarrier density for YBCO is comparable with that obtainedwhen a hole concentration of 1-26 (6 0.1) per cell (4.6 X1021 cm'3) is assumed, whereas for LSCO one hole per Sratom would give a carrier density of 1.6 X 1021 cm- 3 in theabsence of 0 vacancies. The greater than expected plasmafrequency observed in LSCO may result from a low effectivemass for the carriers, or alternatively there may be a largecontribution from carriers excited from lower-lying bands.

Band-structure calculations on YBCO 283

2 have suggestedthe existence of interband transitions that depend on thedistribution of the bridging 0, and Chui et al.32 have sug-gested that the optical conductivity between 0.1 and 1 eV isentirely due to these transitions. This would explain thedependence on 0 content and the lack of temperature de-pendence of the optical properties in this region. The infra-red optical properties of LSCO are similar to those of YBCO,but band-structure calculations for LSCO in its fully oxy-genated form333 do not give any indication of suitablebands, which could explain the optical properties in terms ofinterband transitions. However,' O vacancies in LSCOmight be expected to have electronic transitions similar tothose discussed for YBCO. Theoretical and experimentalstudies of the effect of 0 vacancies on the optical propertieswould be a useful area for further investigation.

An alternative viewpoint is to consider that the regionabove -1000 cm-' is associated with free carriers rather thaninterband excitations. The difference between the tem-perature-dependent properties of the carriers at zero fre-quency and their temperature-independent properties atoptical frequencies can be explained by a scattering rate thatis temperature dependent at low frequencies but that in-creases with frequency until saturation is reached. Thissaturation occurs somewhere in the infrared where the meanfree path becomes comparable with the lattice spacing.This type of scattering would be expected in a two-dimen-sional square lattice near half-band filling,34 and it has beenused to describe the far-infrared properties of polycrystal-line LSCO27 and YBCO16 as well as the mixed valence com-pound CePd3.35 The frequency-dependent scattering im-plies an effective mass enhancement at low frequencies.

CONCLUSION

We have presented measurements of the polarized reflec-tance spectra for crystals of both LSCO and YBCO materi-als. These measurements give direct confirmation of thelarge degree of anisotropy in the dielectric function of thesematerials. Evidence has been presented indicating that the0.5-eV mode in LSCO may be associated with 0-deficientsample regions. Broad electronic absorption is observed inthe infrared in both LSCO and YBCO. This absorption

either may be the result of 0-related interband excitation ormay be due to free-carrier intraband excitation for which thecarriers have a frequency-dependent scattering rate. It isdifficult to distinguish between these explanations in theYBCO case because the carrier density is directly correlatedwith the 0 content in that material. In LSCO, however, it ispossible to change the carrier concentration through the Srcontent and to vary the 0 content independently to a certainextent. Thus LSCO would appear to be the more suitablesystem for further studies aimed at separating free-carrierand 0-related contributions to the optical properties. Fur-ther measurements on single crystals will be needed to es-tablish in detail the transition from dc to infrared frequen-cies and to separate the various contributions to the infraredproperties.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to thank P. Haycock and P. Thomas for x-rayorientation of the crystals, A. J. de Groot and G. P. Rapsonfor Meissner measurements, and the United Kingdom Sci-ence and Engineering Research Council for support of thisresearch.

REFERENCES

1. C. Chen, B. E. Watts, B. M. Wanklyn, P. Thomas, and P. W.Haycock, J. Cryst. Growth 91, 659 (1988).

2. B. M. Wanklyn, C. Chen, B. E. Watts, P. Haycock, F. L. Pratt, P.A. J. deGroot, and G. P. Rapson, Solid State Commun. 66, 441(1988).

3. J. M. Bassat, P. Odier, and F. Gervais, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7126(1987).

4. F. Gervais, P. Echegut, J. M. Bassat, and P. Odier, Phys. Rev. B37, 9364 (1988).

5. J. Orenstein, G. A. Thomas, D. H. Rapkine, C. G. Bethea, B. F.Levine, R. J. Cava, E. A. Rietman, and D. W. Johnson, Jr., Phys.Rev. B 36, 729 (1987)..

6. Z. Schlesinger, R. T. Collins, M. W. Shafer, and E. M. Engler,Phys. Rev. B 36, 5275 (1987).

7. G. L. Doll, J. Steinbeck, G. Dresselhaus, M. S. Dresselhaus, A. J.Strauss, and H. J. Zeiger, Phys. Rev. B 36, 8884 (1987).

8. J. Orenstein, G. A. Thomas, D. H. Rapkine, C. G. Bethea, B. F.Levine, B. Batlogg, R. J. Cava, D. W. Johnson, Jr., and E. A.Rietman, Phys. Rev. B 36, 8892 (1987).

9. Y. H. Kim, A. J. Heeger, L. Acedo, G. Stucky, and F. Wudl,Phys. Rev. B 36, 7252 (1987).

10. Z. Schlesinger, R. T. Collins, D. L. Kaiser, and F. Holzberg,Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1958 (1987).

11. D. B. Tanner, S. L. Herr, K. Kamaras, C. D. Porter, T. Timusk,D. Bonn, J. D. Garrett, J. E. Greedan, C. V. Stager, M. Reedy, S.Etemad, and S.-W. Chan, presented at the International Con-ference on Science and Technology of Synthetic Metals, SantaFe, N.M., June 1988.

12. U. Walter, M. S. Sherwin, A. Stacy, P. L. Richards, and A. Zettl,Phys. Rev. B 35, 5327 (1987).

13. P. E. Sulewski, A. J. Sievers, S. E. Russek, H. D. Hallen, D. K.Lathrop, and R. A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. B 35, 5330 (1987).

14. Z. Schlesinger, R. L. Greene, J. G. Bednorz, and K. A. Miuller,Phys. Rev. B 35, 5334 (1987).

15. Z. Schlesinger, R. T. Collins, and M. W. Shafer, Phys. Rev. B 35,7232 (1987).

16. P. E. Sulewski, T. W. Noh, J. T. McWhirter, A. J. Sievers, S. E.Russek, R. A. Buhrman, C. S. Jee, J. E. Crow, R. E. Salmon, andG. Myer, Phys. Rev. B 36, 2357 (1987).

17. D. A. Bonn, J. E. Greedan, C. V. Stager, T. Timusk, M. Doss, S.Herr, K. Kamaras, C. Porter, D. B. Tanner, J. M. Tarascon, W.R. McKinnon, and L. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. B 35, 8843 (1987).

18. M. S. Sherwin, P. L. Richards, and A. Zettl, Phys. Rev. B 37,1587 (1988).

Nichol et al.

408 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B/Vol. 6, No. 3/March 1989

19. D. A. Bonn, A. H. O'Reilly, J. E. Greedan, C. V. Stager, T.Timusk, K. Kamaras, and D. B. Tanner, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1574(1988).

20. D. A. Bonn, J. E. Greedan, C. V. Stager, T. Timusk, M. Doss, S.Herr, K. Kamaras, C. Porter, and D. B. Tanner, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 2249 (1987).

21. G. A. Thomas, H. K. Ng, A. J. Millis, R. N. Bhatt, R. J. Cava, E.A. Rietman, D. W. Johnson, Jr., G. P. Espinosa, and J. M.Vandenberg, Phys. Rev. B 36, 846 (1987).

22. L. Genzel, A. Wittlin, J. Kuhl, Hj. Mattausch, W. Bauhofer, andA. Simon, Solid State Commun. 63, 843 (1987).

23. R. T. Collins, Z. Schlesinger, R. H. Koch, R. B. Laibowitz, T. S.Plaskett, P. Freitas, W. J. Gallaher, R. L. Sandstrom, and T. R.Dinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 704 (1987).

24. A. Wittlin, L. Genzel, M. Cardona, M. Bauer, W. K6nig, E.Garcia, M. Barahona, and M. V. Cabanas, Phys. Rev. B 37, 652(1988).

25. D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958).

26. D. A. G. Bruggemann, Ann. Phys. 24, 636 (1934).27. P. E. Sulewski, T. W. Noh, J. T. McWhirter, and A. J. Sievers,

Phys. Rev. B 36, 5735 (1987).28. L. F. Mattheiss and D. R. Hamann, Solid State Commun. 63,

395 (1987).29. E. Orti, Ph. Lambin, J.-L. Bredas, J.-P. Vigneron, E. G. Der-

ouane, A. A. Lucas, and J.-M. Andre, Solid State Commun. 64,313 (1987).

30. G.-L. Zhao, Y. Xu, W. Y. Ching, and K. W. Wong, Phys. Rev. B36, 7203 (1987).

31. D. W. Bullett and W. G. Dawson, J. Phys. C 20, L853 (1987).32. S. T. Chui, R. U. Kasowski, and W. Y. Hsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61,

885 (1988).33. L. F. Mattheiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1028 (1987).34. P. A. Lee and N. Read, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2691 (1987).35. B. C. Webb, A. J. Sievers, and T. Mihalisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57,

1951 (1986).

Nichol et al.